r/SunoAI

I’ve been generating some incredible full-length tracks using Suno lately, and the audio quality is honestly blowing me away. My main goal now is to start uploading them to YouTube and TikTok to actually build an audience for the music.

The problem I’m hitting is the visual presentation. Just putting up a static image of the prompt artwork feels super lazy and doesn't get any retention on short-form feeds. But manually cutting video clips on a timeline to match the changes in the song structure takes hours, especially when trying to align scene transitions perfectly with the drops and chorus shifts.

For those of you who are successfully pushing your Suno generations to social channels, what is your workflow for the video side? Are you manually editing assets by hand, or is there a standard way to automate the visual layout so it syncs up natively with the track's rhythm and audio transients?

Would love to hear how you guys keep your production fast without losing days to video editing software.

虚ろなる救世主の残響 · 金色の傷跡

Deezer says AI music is already ~44% of all uploads now… but almost nobody is actually listening to it.

According to their latest report:

• ~75,000 AI-generated tracks are uploaded every day
• Around 2 million AI tracks per month
• AI music now makes up roughly 44% of new uploads

But the weird part is:

AI music only accounts for something like 1–3% of total streams.

And apparently a big chunk of AI-related streams get flagged as fraud or botted, so Deezer is already demonetizing a lot of it and even pushing it out of recommendations.

What really stands out is the gap between creation and attention.

We can now generate music at basically unlimited scale, but listening time hasn’t changed. So most tracks just disappear into the noise without ever being heard.

As someone who both creates and listens to AI music, I’ve also started noticing something else:

It’s getting harder to find spaces where AI music can just be shared and listened to without instant bias or dismissal.

Lately I’ve been spending more time on Suno and Musicful, just browsing the showcase section and listening to what people are making.

Some of the tracks I’ve found there are actually really good. Not “good for AI music”, just good music, period. Stuff I’d actually keep in my playlist.

I’m not a musician or producer, just someone who likes discovering music. And it honestly feels like there are a lot of good ideas getting buried under the sheer amount of uploads.

Curious how others see this:

Do you think AI music is getting easier to make, but harder to actually get heard?

I just lost like 3000 credits and probably 2 week of time.... and I just wanna make you aware of more issues with 5.5 that I just discovered the most painful way:

I am doing long instrumental tracks, 8-15mins usually. Those tracks have been made in a custom suno model with old Udio samples, some generations, some ,ashups and some covers later I got pieces I liked. For my next album I wanted to have the tracks flow into each other as I once did with an Udio album --> I added the 2 tracks then into SUNO Studio, tagged one track as the "original audio" so the BPM doesn't mess up the whole project. With a little space in between those tracks, the BPMs corrected I went into the new Editor where something happened that I still cannot explain. I was constantly working on those transitions between the tracks, many generations, many tries. After a week I was happy, went ahead and listened to the whole track - something felt very off, the sound quality sounded like the track went from a WAV to a fully damaged 56kbps MP3 sound alike thingy. First of all I thought maybe it's just the preview quality while playing it in the browser until I pulled out the original generation to compare the quality and its day and night.

I have no idea which step exactly caused that issues, not sure if it was Studio or many, many edits in the new Editor but something absolutely crapped the quality of the track to a level where I cannot even fix it anymore and this affected the sections of the track that I didn't even touch or edit!!!! Tried remastering.... it's just painful, 5.5 cannot remaster. Tried remastering into v5... forget it.

Feel free to downvote me and tell me that I prompt bad or that SUno is just an amazing tool.... I don't even care anymore. Suno was amazing until around 2 weeks before 5.5 dropped and fully killed off a 4.5 track for me that I worked so long on. I wasted too much time, put so much effort just to have something completely messed up beyond repair. I am so so so so done with Suno.... I will push through that last album as I am still bound by the yearly contract, that's it from my side. If people are really interested I might pull some samples later so you can hear it yourself what Suno did..... Feels like Suno should only be used as a one click slop generator with no editing applied to tracks.... I cannot even express how frustrated I am with having a second project destroyed by something that is beyond the power of the users.

I redid an old jam in 5.5.

I love the new depth of emotion - but sometimes it goes alway the way to rage lol.

Any way to reel that in a bit?

So....I make Ai songs for self consumption in that I just love to create new music since Im not getting that from the current generation of music. I make it two different ways:

1. Upload music I created myself, and have Suno make it better. ALOT better. Like.....1000% better. It understand what im trying to do, matches the notes exactly, and sings with a style I tell it to, but with a expert level singing.

2. Create a prompt and lyrics, and Suno surprises me with a song. I do not control the melody or harmony directly. It decides that unlike option 1. I dont choose the notes, my prompt only describes types of instruments, singing styles, and musical influences

Now, im an amateur, and will never be an expert musician. But, Ai enables me to make (what I think) is pretty good music. But, there is the problem. In option 2, Suno made music based on existing music, and essentially copied it. IF ai music becomes more popular, the next iteration will be a copy of a copy. Then again, a copy of a copy of a copy.

Many folks here have NEVER used or owned a non digital copier in their life. A copy of a copy on a copier gets more distorted and lower quality with each iteration. It starts losing information, it gets fuzzy....just loses its soul.

Im afraid prompt based music, where the ai is trained on ai music will be just like that. Copies of copies. Originality will be gone. Nothing will feel special anymore. Everyone will have their "copy". And guess what? Nobody will give a rats ass. When they hear your prompt generated song, they will think I can easily make this too.

Will there be another new genre of music? Like rap? Or grunge? How could there be? 80s Rap music was made from the OG 70s music. Punk rock music was made by rebelling against what rock music has become. How the hell can you make punk rock music style revolutions today, with...a fucking prompt???????? You cant. Only more of the same shit. Then copied shit...and it goes downhill.

Im saying this as someone that experienced the birth of alot of new music genres. As a kid it was disco and punk, then rap hair band rock, new British invasion, goth type music, electronica like Depeche mode, then grunge, 90s punk, emo...etc...each was fascinating and organic. And reflected society.

Ok..long winded. So...how can Ai be used to not ruin music. Go with option 1. As a tool to help bring music to life. You would maybe learn a tiny bit of music theory. Learn an instrument. THEN Ai can help round out your song where you might not be as proficient. New ideas that werent learned by ai can still exist.

BUT..if we stick with option 2? Purely prompts? Music will suck. And our kids music? Will sound like your music. And that is the WORST fucking thing I can think could happen. Because if the new generation doesnt make some completely new music that I hate...then theyre doing it all wrong. (That example is because my dad hated rap, his dad probably hated rock and roll....etc..)

End of rant

Why hasn't suno approached Reddit to have that subreddit taken down? It is literally people trashing the idea of suno on every single post. It is insanity and people will mistake it for an official subreddit.

I know many of you take Suno very seriously when it comes to writing lyrics and all that, but does anyone else find themselves in a situation where the lyrics make absolutely zero sense, yet you still love the song because it’s catchy?? Some have even given me literal eargasms despite it not making any sense. 🤭

For instance, I generated an R&B/rap-sounding song that’s literally about turkey. Turkey this, turkey that. The song is chaotic and dumb, but I don’t care because it ironically sounds amazing and the vocals are so good!

I have literally 100 songs that I obviously couldn’t legitimately release (I know if I did people would be like what?…), but I enjoy listening to them anyway. It’s like my little secret lol.

Anyone else?

I have a question regarding original lyrics and copyright, and I'd love to hear your thoughts or if anyone has looked deep into how this works in practice. I write my own original lyrics and recently used them to generate several songs on Suno. Here is the catch: I only officially registered the copyright for these lyrics after I had already generated the songs on the platform. This means that, technically, the earliest official "timestamp" of these lyrics existing is on Suno's servers, prior to my official copyright registration date. My concern is: Could Suno, in a hypothetical bad-faith scenario, use this timestamp discrepancy to claim that the lyrics were generated by their AI, or claim some sort of ownership over them? I know their ToS states that we own our inputs, but I'm wondering if this timeline creates a loophole. The "prior art" is technically on their database first. Has anyone else been in this situation, or does anyone with a better understanding of their ToS and copyright law know how protected we actually are in this specific scenario? Thanks in advance!

Like title says, I want to hear your best/favorite dubstep. Suno only please I don't have Spotify. I'll post mine in the comments.

A little song for Usopp with a deep, raspy voice and a lot of swagger.

So I have a hard time coming up with lyrics for my songs, I'll have a starting point, but get stumped on how to continue it, does anyone have any app suggestions that could help me with that, I only have 1 good song I've made that my friends have actually said they like.

I'm sure most here that use Suno AI are aware of a modest voice cloning feature they introduced (as kind of a 'disguised' feature imo). Essentially, you can create "voices" on the app that you can select to be emulated as the artist voice for whatever track you're creating. This is only accessible via desktop (at the time of writing), so if you've been using Suno from your phone, you're not gonna see it.

Even though they call the feature 'voices', it basically mandates that you provide your own voice (or at least that individual must be present) because there is a "verification" process that you must complete after your submission where you're required to say a randomly generated phrase they give you. So, in essence, Suno is asking for you the creator to lend your own voice.

Through experimentation, I figured the way to generate the best results is for someone to take a track they've recorded (personally), then isolate the vocal stems (their part) and upload that to Suno as the 'sample' (make sure its the raw vocals). Then, complete the verification process. Afterward, upload the full song (stems & all) and select the new voice you created to accompany it. Then paste all of the actual lyrics to that song in the lyrics box. Then tune your settings for the "weird", "style" and "audio" accordingly. I'd recommend tuning weird between 20-30; closer to 30 for more creativity. Then leaving "style" at 50 and pushing "audio" up to 50 to ensure the final output track doesn't deviate too much from your original.

When you complete this process, you should have the Suno version of the song with your voice.

Now - let me temper expectations for a second. Will it sound exactly like you? No. You'll notice the differences. But it will sound enough like you to where you should be able to send it to someone you know and expect them to respond back asking, "Is this you??". Is that good enough for most of ya'll? Probably not. That's not the point of why I'm writing this though.

My point is that this is where that feature is right NOW. It won't remain stagnant. I know for a fact it won't. The pace at which AI research is receiving funding and accelerating is face melting. There are constant improvements in the "speech to text", "speech to speech" and "text to speech" sector of NLP. Look at how many different model generations Suno has released in just the last year alone. I'm saying all that to say...if things head toward where I think they're gonna head...I believe the voice cloning feature will get good enough to where it legitimately does sound like you got in the booth and recorded it yourself. Or at least the average ear won't be able to discern the difference.

And that's gonna be the inflection point. Why? Because pushback gets a hell of a lot harder. At that point, its (if you choose) your own lyrics, your own prompt alongside your own reference track accompanied by your actual voice. The only part the AI is really playing is polishing it up, mastering & engineering it on a level previously only available to engineers. Pay attention to that last sentence. This is a benefit professional musicians get everyday. The only thing AI is doing at that point is democratizing that access.

That now becomes music you could credibly perform. Why not? Its your lyrics and your voice. It doesn't need to sound the exact same way live as it does when you're in the studio. You guys have been to concerts. Does your favorite artist's live performances EVER sound exactly like it does in the studio? You don't give a fuck. You're there to have fun and sing along and watch them perform it. Why wouldn't it be the same for you? Unless you're someone with zero singing ability whatsoever but you've managed to transform a track that has you hitting Adele-esque runs, I doubt your AI track has anything in it you can't solidly perform yourself in a way where it basically hits the same.

Once this transition happens - AI music has to be accepted. People will look at AI as just another DAW plug-in that artists use. Its a computerized enhancement. EVERY fucking artist has that. That's what those big ass mixing and mastering boards in professional studios are there for. To make that artist sound like a million bucks. Once the music reflects the creator, AI music will be accepted.

I’ve been working on a desktop app called Stem Forge Pro by DiscoramaLab

The problem I wanted to solve is something I keep running into with AI music tools: the song idea can be good, but once you export the stems and try to mix them seriously, the drums and percussion often sound weak, metallic, smeared, unstable, or just not really usable in a serious DAW session.

So instead of trying to fix everything with EQ, denoise, or transient shaping, I built a donor-based reconstruction system.

The basic idea is:

keep the original groove and timing
analyze the AI-generated drum/percussion stem
separate the main roles like kick, snare, hi-hat and percussion
repair or rebuild weak parts using cleaner donor-based source material
export cleaner raw stems that are easier to mix in a DAW

The tool can generate repaired/rebuilt outputs for different drum roles, so instead of only getting one damaged AI drum stem, you can work with more useful separated material such as kick, snare, hi-hat and percussion layers.

To be clear, the output is not meant to sound like a fully mixed, widened AI stem immediately. It is more like clean raw source material: drier, more direct, and ready for proper processing with EQ, compression, saturation, reverb, stereo work, etc.

That was intentional. I didn’t want to fake a polished mix. I wanted to give producers better source material to work with instead of trying to rescue damaged AI drum stems.

One thing I noticed during testing: it’s worth trying a few different settings on the same stem. AI stems can be very inconsistent, so sometimes the best result comes from testing a couple of variations and choosing the strongest one.

The GUI is still rough, I’ll be honest. It’s functional, but not beautiful yet. My priority was getting the engine and reconstruction quality working first. The interface can improve later.

Small note: the Mac / OSX version is not finished yet, so the first release is Windows-only for now. Mac support is on the roadmap.

For now, I’m mainly looking for feedback from people who actually export AI stems and try to finish tracks properly in a DAW.

I won’t post the link here unless the mods allow it, because I don’t want to break the self-promo rules. If anyone is genuinely interested, you can search for “Stem Forge Pro Discorama Lab” or ask me.

Do you also find drums and percussion to be one of the weakest parts of AI-generated stems?

Generating a song used to be the hard part. Now it's not. You can open basically any site, type a few words, and get something that sounds professionally produced. That gap closed faster than I expected, honestly. Suno's still ahead on pure quality in my experience, but the distance between the top tools has shrunk a lot.

So if everyone can generate a decent song, what are these companies actually competing on now?

I've been using Suno since 2023 and I keep watching their product updates, and it's pretty clear they figured this out a while ago. The Home and Explore pages aren't just for discovery. There's curated playlists, different genre sections, a community feed, bots that like and comment on tracks. It's starting to look less like a generation tool and more like a streaming platform that also lets you make songs. That's not accidental.

The Voice feature is where it gets interesting to me though. Create Music with Your Voice isn't really about the technology. I mean it is, it's impressive. First time I heard my own voice come back through a generated track I actually had to play it twice because I wasn't sure if it was working right. It was. But the product logic underneath it is: your voice is now an asset. It's yours. You trained it, it sounds like you and not the next person. That's a very different relationship with a tool than "I typed a prompt and it gave me a song."

Suddenly there's a reason to keep coming back that has nothing to do with whether the generation quality improved this month.

Other platforms are clearly watching. I've tried a few others and both Musicful and Mureka have Voice features rolling out now. Mureka's feels a bit earlier stage. Musicful's is closer. Neither has Suno's head start on the ecosystem side but they're moving.

My read is the next 12-18 months of competition isn't going to be about who has the best model. It's going to be about who gets users to build something inside the platform they don't want to leave behind. Voice is one version of that. Community is another.

Anyway this is half-formed. I've just been thinking about it while using these tools. Maybe I'm reading too much into a feature drop.