u/Guilty_Road6428

Landfall without Land Tutors? - The Necrobloom
▲ 2 r/EDH

Landfall without Land Tutors? - The Necrobloom

Do you think building a landfall deck without Land Tutors is reasonable to tone down power level? I'm talking specifically about omitting any type of card with the text "search your library" for a land. So no Fetch Lands, no Sac lands, no Nature's Lore, no Rampant Growth, no Sakura Tribe Elder. I don't want to shuffle my deck even once.

More specifically, I am looking to build a Necrobloom deck. I know that all of the above are great in the deck and loop with the Necroblooms Dredge ability. However my playgroup usually plays at bracket 2, with only a few decks really breaking into bracket 3. Most decklists I see for Necrobloom have it sitting at a 4 (or powerful 3 at worst), and are very expensive due to all of the requisite fetch lands, surveil lands, etc.

I'm imagining it like this:
-Incredibly consistent curve with 40-42 lands
- [[Crucible of Worlds]] type of effects to play lands from graveyard
- [[Azusa, Lost but Seeking]] type of effects to play more than one land per turn
- [[Splendid Reclamation]] type of effects to create many landfall triggers later in games when I have a set up board. [[Famished Worldsire]] comes to mind.
- In lieu of traditional ramp [[Dredger's Insight]] or [[Grapple With The Past]] type of effects. My thinking is these will fill my graveyard and let me search for specific creatures or spells to keep since I can Dredge up any lands via Necrobloom
-Triomes, Surveil Lands, and other taped fetch-able lands lose value since I won't be fetching them, but I have not decided if they are worth omitting altogether

Do you think this would reasonably tone down power level, or do you think it goes too far and nueters what the deck wants to do (loop sacrifice lands for multiple land triggers). Do you have any card recomendations that you think would help this deck? My goal is ultimately a bracket 3, so I will be including [[Field of The Dead]] but not [[Glacial Chasm]] (since I personally think that makes an unfun play pattern at a bracket 3 table).

I've included a Moxfield link below. This is less a decklist and more me smashing together a list of cards I've considered for this idea that I'll need to whittle down later. Thank you all!

https://moxfield.com/decks/cczSnRTpvUOqYJt25ttXSA

u/Guilty_Road6428 — 9 days ago