u/GunFunZS

I live in between Lincoln and Summitview & between 40th and 16th. I recently moved to this neighborhood.

We took with us Verizon wireless internet and it really sucks here. In my prior neighborhood it was not particularly fast but it wasn't slow enough to cause problems. My understanding is that the they don't technically offer the service in this neighborhood but if it works whatever.

I like the business model of Advanced internet but I don't believe they get reception in this neighborhood either. For reference, their prices never go up because obviously the acceptable performance numbers go up over time and they guarantee bandwidth minimums not "up to x"... So they're pricing and output seems more than fair.

I'm guessing that the easy answer for performance is going to be spectrum but my wife really really really hates the company and how persistent they are with marketing after you have their service and how they often try to change your package after the fact, and raise prices on services that are now obsolete levels of performance after a few years.

What else is there? Give me your experience with the different alternatives please. I want to hear the good and the bad. As well as the cost per performance tier. We are not super power users we just want to be able to stream a couple of shows and have a couple of phones web browsing at the same time.

So the federal government is currently suing the city of Denver over its AWB.

Here's a link to the complaint.

https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1439466/dl

Colorado is in the 10th circuit. This would not immediately apply to Washington, but would potentially create a circuit split depending on the ruling.

More importantly the federal government is for once on our side of the actual main issue.

It does have a lot of cope, about AR-15s are okay because they aren't like cannons... Which still misses the core point of the 2A, and even of the Miller decision. We are allowed to have anything that we think might be useful for personal defense national defense or general military use. Arguing that something is like what the military uses is an argument under the Second amendment in favor of civilian ownership not against it.

Edit to add that it appears nagr and the doj are also suing Colorado State over its 15 round mag ban. This is an excellent sign. https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1439591/dl

Lawsuit at quick reading appears to be functionally identical. Somebody who's paying more attention may notice distinguishing factors but it seems to me that these cases are designed to be merged.