Research
Why do so many established platforms struggle to move to Web3 architectures? (student researcher, looking for real-world perspectives)
I'm a Master's student researching why established digital platforms (marketplaces, social/community platforms, fintech intermediaries) so often fail when they try to migrate toward Web3 models, while native protocols like Uniswap thrive.
Two well-known examples keep coming up: Reddit's Community Points (shut down after a couple of years) versus protocol-native projects that never had a legacy business to restructure.
From the literature, I keep running into a few candidate explanations:
- Incumbents need an 18-36 month cultural shift that many don't fund or tolerate
- Leadership fluent in only business OR only crypto, but not both
- Revenue models built on capturing value, which clash with distributing it to users/token holders
- Regulatory uncertainty (e.g. MiCA in the EU) acting as an excuse more than a cause
I'd really like to hear from people who have seen this from the inside (building, advising, or evaluating such projects):
Which of these actually matters most in practice, and which are overrated?
Is there a factor missing that you've seen make or break a transition?
Can you think of a counter-example of an established company that did it well?
To be transparent: this feeds into my thesis (supervised by Prof. Romain Gandia, IAE Savoie Mont Blanc). I'm not selling anything, and I'll anonymise anything I use. If I'd like to quote a comment, I'll ask for permission in the thread first.
Thanks!