



LLM labs are optimizing for sounding intelligent instead of actually being intelligent?
If you've gone through r/Anthropic or other Opus 5 heavy subs you'll be well aware of the verbosity slop that Claude's most recent upgrades have created. It'll easily spend around half or more of a response writing poetry while only 1 point out of 6 is actually valid or relevant to the question you asked. (see image 1)
There's also the phenomenon I noticed where every frontier LLM (Claude, Grok, GPT, Gemini) repeatedly and aggressively uses the word "classic" (see images 2, 3, 4) even especially in situations where it (A) doesn't apply to the problem at all, or (B) is actually not even a 'classic' fix.
It'll then backpedal immediately and cycle to a different solution when called out.
My initial thought was, why do LLMs always find everything "classic" and then get it wrong anyway?
Putting two and two together, as of Q3 2026, the situation reads that LLM labs are changing their tactic away from actual sound development of frontier intelligence toward the illusion of sounding intelligent.
That's why we are having situations where people willingly downgrade from Claude 5 models to 4.6 or 4.7 because the "pseudo-sophisticated" shorthanded alien language has become too unbearable or friction-heavy for ordinary human comprehension or even engineering use cases.
What are your thoughts?