u/Hammerraid

Im seeing reviews saying it's quite soft at 400mm and to just stick to 300mm which would be a shame, and other saying it's just that theyre not using the lens right or pixel peeping. Ive also heard that some people might have just recieved a bad copy. What are your thoughts?

Would the panaleica 100-400 be better on an olympus body?

P.S. I want to use it for wildlife and it doesn't seem like there's any lens between this and the 75-300mm. Anyone have experience comparing the 100-400 vs 75-300?

reddit.com
u/Hammerraid — 18 days ago
▲ 1.1k r/fujifilm

These are from emilie.hofferber (ig) and i think somewhere she mentions to underexpose/overexpose and touch it up in post.

However, I would like to shoot this style straight from camera (or even if its just close enough). Notably the flatter (?) look where the colours aren't as saturated (?) but fit into that bubble gum sky look with the purples, pinks and oranges

Im guessing these images would be overexposed in this case

Apologies for the noob language, im still new to cameras

u/Hammerraid — 20 days ago