Im seeing reviews saying it's quite soft at 400mm and to just stick to 300mm which would be a shame, and other saying it's just that theyre not using the lens right or pixel peeping. Ive also heard that some people might have just recieved a bad copy. What are your thoughts?
Would the panaleica 100-400 be better on an olympus body?
P.S. I want to use it for wildlife and it doesn't seem like there's any lens between this and the 75-300mm. Anyone have experience comparing the 100-400 vs 75-300?