u/Harder_than_calculus

This is a megathread for daily discussion. Please remember to be respectful and follow the rules in your discourse.

This is a megathread for daily discussion. Please remember to be respectful and follow the rules in your discourse.

At the risk of further scrutiny for being the “pro-Patrick” subreddit — these are no longer allowed.

I’ve discussed them with an admin of Reddit and they are considered harassment and doxxing by their standards. Sorry, but we’re not gonna risk losing this sub over these.

Please report it if you see screenshots.

I'm a mod of the largest community where discussion about the Lindsay Clancy trial takes place. Today, some people sleuthed out the husband's Reddit account through pullpush io and now everybody is posting screenshots of his posts and comments.

I have no way to verify they're real but they seem authentic in that they were his.

Some users are messaging us to remove them because it's "doxxing" but I'm torn on whether it is or not. He's a very public person now and none of it contains PII but it is linking his real life to the account.

I just don't know if I should allow them or remove them? Hoping for some advice.

Hey everyone,

Starting today, we're introducing a minimum account requirement to help cut down on troll accounts, throwaways used to spread misinformation, and low-effort spam.

Posts/comments will be automatically removed only if an account meets BOTH of the following:

• Younger than 30 days, AND
• Less than 100 combined karma

In other words, if your account clears either the age threshold or the karma threshold, you're fine. This only filters out accounts that are brand new and essentially karma-less.

If your post/comment gets removed and can prove you're a good contributor with your history then reach out to us via ModMail and we can set you up to still be able to post if you don't meet these requirements.

New rule and implementation will be up and active shortly.

— Mod team

Hey everyone,

This case touches on real difficult topics: postpartum psychosis, maternal mental health, how the legal system handles cases like this, and gender dynamics in how these cases get discussed and prosecuted. We want this to be a place to discuss these issues.

What we don't want is what we've been seeing more of lately: memes, one liners, and comments that exist just to insult a gender or group instead of saying anything real. Comments like "typical ___ women" or "this is why men are ___" aren't commentary. They don't add to the discussion and they make this sub worse.

So here's the new rule:

No Bigotry or Sexism. Discussion of gender, race, mental health, and related disparities is very welcome because it's an important conversation and we think it's a reality in this case. However slurs, dehumanizing language, or blanket insults targeting a gender, race, or other group are not.

What this looks like in practice:

Allowed: "Would a male father in this situation would have been treated the same way by the courts?"

Allowed: "Black women are tried and sentenced more harshly than white women in similar cases."

Not allowed: "Of course a woman did this, they're all unstable white Karens."

Not allowed: Memes or images whose whole point is mocking a gender or group and that's it.

We're not trying to shut down hard conversations. We're trying to keep them conversations.

Mods have the discretion to decide whether it's removed or not.

Thanks,

Dux Deaths Mod Team

As of 10:20am local time the JURY IS DEADLOCKED and we DO NOT know what they’re deadlocked on.

Quick FAQ:

What happened? On Tuesday (day 4 of jury deliberations), the jury told Judge Sullivan they couldn't reach a unanimous verdict. He sent them back to keep deliberating.

How many times can the judge send them back? No set limit. It's up to the judge's discretion how long to keep pushing before declaring a mistrial.

What's the "Tuey-Rodriguez" instruction? Massachusetts's version of the national "Allen charge" which are extra instructions a judge can give to nudge a deadlocked jury toward a verdict. Sullivan hasn't used it yet. Click here for more information.

If it ends in a mistrial? Prosecutors then decide whether to retry the case, drop the case, or offer a plea deal.

This will be the Megathread for TRIAL DAY 25. The jury is deliberating.

Please remember to be respectful in your discourse below.

You can watch the full coverage on Court TV, the Associated Press, or Law & Crime Trials.

If you say Patrick, I swear to father bob.

If you believe she’s NGRI and people are being weird then I will remove comments admonishing your belief. Hopefully you can feel free to post without scrutiny.

I think she’s guilty. For me, it’s the fact that Lindsay made Patrick leave to go pick up the food and meds. Specifically, her saying she didn’t want him to leave because she was scared and mapped it because she wanted him to hurry back completely contradicts this.

That Lindsay is consistently inconsistent in her retelling of the events that day. It basically means nothing because it has been different with every single person she's told the story to.

What else am I missing?

This will be the thread for trial day 16.

Please remember to be respectful in your discourse below.

You can watch the full coverage on Court TV.

I’m just curious what people think of his analyses on LC specifically. So far, he’s come out with two.

I used to really like his content on other trials but once we kind of became a shill and hopped on the Epstein bandwagon, I got sick of him and I wonder if his opinions are compromised a bit.

Edit: This video is actually really decent. I posted this before watching it in full.

Hey everyone.

We're updating and clarifying one of our sub rules.

We're expanding the existing "No Patrick Clancy Killed the Children Speculation" rule to be more specific. Going forward, the new rule is "No Patrick Clancy Conspiracies" and this covers any baseless theories about Patrick Clancy, including:

• Claims that he killed the children
• Claims that he SA'd the children
• Claims that he cheated on Lindsay
• Posts arguing against or "debunking" these claims
• Third party posts from other sources admonishing the claims

If your post or comment touches on any of the above, it will be removed regardless of which "side" it argues. Repeated violations will lead to further moderation action.

We know this case draws a lot of strong opinions, and we appreciate everyone helping keep discussion focused on what's actually known. If something changes and new evidence is made available, we'll revisit this.

20:53 is the time mark and this was right before they recessed after the autopsy testimony.

For anybody who missed it. During today’s testimony, Big Red made a comment to the judge about how the commonwealth got picked up on hot mic saying “shut her up”.

Update:
Here's the video where Reddinton accused the defense: https://youtu.be/e4OtRLjIzEY?si=NqXnoiZ-aVTN7gDA

I think you can actually hear Patrick’s screams in this.

I was scrolling Facebook and saw a post by a reporter stating that. Sheesh where the heck have I been. Can anybody verify this?

Possible TW:

I miss a time when holidays were actually exciting and something to look forward to. Food was the last thing on my mind. I dread them now because I can’t stop thinking about food. I spend hours and hours stressing about holidays and outings and trying to control every little thing so I don’t “lose” control.

I kept overriding my disordered thinking and challenging it and ended up overeating in defiance this weekend and the guilt is dreadful. I just wanna cry and lock myself up for the next month. I know it’s not the solution but the guilt is so immense that I just want to throw every disordered habit at it to make it go away. Alas I know I have to just soldier on. There was a time when I didn’t know what this guilt felt like and was so blissfully unaware. Didn’t think twice about my body. I really miss that. I miss that girl.

This post is really all over the place. I’m just feeling horrible right now and thought maybe a message into the abyss would help.