u/Harpers_Ferry

I'm not arguing for or against subjective morality.

We have multiple competing moral frameworks, that do have a lot of crossover, but also quite a few divergences. Even within a particular moral framework, individual interpretations of those frameworks render them concepts that we appeal to but often diverge from. Because this is the case, if morality is not objective, it is ultimately subjective. And if it's subjective, we have to use terms like the commonly used "human flourishing" or "harm reduction"/"less suffering" but what counts as flourishing, harm, or suffering also differ person to person. So we'd be better off coming to agreement about suffering or flourishing instead, and appealing to those, not Morality.