u/Harry1T6

My review of The Other Bennet Sister

It has long been a truth universally acknowledged that a scholarly, studious, or socially awkward young woman must be transformed before she can woo suitors into asking her to prom. From Olivia Newton-John’s Sandy in “Grease” to the late-’90s teen classic “She’s All That,” the glasses must be tossed aside in lieu of contacts. The hair must come down. The sensible shoes must be replaced with six-inch, red-bottomed stilettos. Only then may she be presented to the world as beautiful, desirable, and worthy of male attention.

This familiar glow-up trope is cleverly resisted in the BBC’s adaptation (available for streaming on Amazon Prime) of Janice Hadlow’s “The Other Bennet Sister,” an imagined parallel life for Jane Austen’s most overlooked Bennet daughter, Mary. The series is not an imitation of Austen, nor does it presume to tell us what Austen really intended for her most solemn and least celebrated sister. Rather, it imagines how Mary might have found her own way through the unforgiving constraints of Regency society after a lifetime of being treated as the family disappointment. As a lover of Austen’s novels, I suspect she herself would have enjoyed it; I don’t think there can be a higher compliment.

In Austen’s original novel, Mary Bennet is remembered as little more than the pious and pedantic middle sister who meanders feebly at the piano and lacks the beauty or wit of her sisters. The BBC’s adaptation begins with that familiar figure but asks what sort of inner life might exist beneath the awkwardness.

Portrayed charmingly by Ella Bruccoleri, Mary is curious, earnest, bookish, and she is content to spend her leisure consuming tomes of nonfiction: geology, history, and whatever other volumes might shield her from a world in which she has never quite belonged. Eventually, she moves to London to live with her aunt, Mrs. Gardiner, played by Indira Varma, with precisely the sort of benevolent wisdom Austen gives her in the novel. There, Mary works as a governess and begins, at last, to grow beyond the cramped emotional confines of her trying mother’s nest.

Even Penelope Featherington, in her season of “Bridgerton,” had her hair redone in flattering curls and traded her pastel dresses for a more alluring and seductive silhouette before Colin Bridgerton finally gave her the time of day. “The Other Bennet Sister” takes a gentler and more interesting route.

A pivotal moment comes when Mrs. Gardiner takes Mary to the haberdashery and encourages her to design her own dress. Mary, having slowly mustered some confidence, channels all her wallflower eccentricity into a design she dreams up herself, blissfully indifferent to the fashions contouring society gatherings. The point is not that she will turn every head at the next masquerade ball. It is that the dress is distinctly hers, and she is not shy about it. Mrs. Gardiner does not drag Mary from her mother’s influence merely to place her in the orbit of a future husband. She gives her the freedom to develop taste, preference, and judgment of her own.

It is here that the series triumphs. Romance still matters — this is still the Jane Austen Cinematic Universe — but it is not pursued as a means to an end. Before Mary can be loved properly, she must first accept that happiness is not a privilege reserved for conventionally comelier girls. “Our happiness is in our own hands,” Mr. Collins, strongly cast here as Ryan Sampson, tells her in a poignant scene, and Mary takes the lesson to heart.

Only once she begins to believe this do suitors of substance begin to recognize her. Midway through the series, she encounters William Ryder, played by Laurie Davidson, a kind of Regency bohemian who introduces her to the idea of indulging her impulses. He is charming, unconventional, and exactly the sort of figure who might tempt a woman like Mary into mistaking libertinism for liberation. But it is ardent romantic Tom Hayward, played with endearing conviction by Dónal Finn, who truly appreciates Mary as she is.

That balance is what makes the adaptation work. Mary is not transformed into a spectacled facsimile of Elizabeth Bennet. Nor is she grafted onto some feminist iconoclast, misunderstood only because the world was too cruel to appreciate her brilliance. She remains awkward, self-serious, and frequently absurd.

In that sense, “The Other Bennet Sister” succeeds because it does not flatter its heroine by pretending she was perfect all along. It insists that imperfection is not the same thing as unworthiness. Mary Bennet does not need a makeover. She needs room to make her own choices, occasionally err, and be loved without becoming someone else.

It is not the conventional conceit of Jane Austen’s novels, but if the author of “Persuasion” and “Pride and Prejudice” were around today, I believe she would approve. The series speaks to contemporary anxieties about self-worth and reinvention while remaining close enough to Austen’s moral universe to feel like a contemporary continuation. In a culture fixated on superficial perfection — from gratuitous Botox injections to whatever deranged absurdities “LooksMaxing” entails — “The Other Bennet Sister” offers the more compelling proposition that Mary Bennet did not lack beauty so much as the freedom and confidence to become herself.

reddit.com
u/Harry1T6 — 7 days ago
▲ 28 r/wine

A Champagne Fit for Engagement

Champagne Stanisla Bonafe 07 Grand Cru 2012

Irish playwright Oscar Wilde is believed to have once remarked that “only the unimaginative can fail to find a reason for drinking Champagne.” Now, I would not consider myself unimaginative per se, but until very recently I had found it difficult to justify Champagne’s premium as the default centrepiece of celebration when my local wine region of Niagara offers such a dazzling array of high-quality traditional-method sparkling wines at considerably more democratic prices.

But having recently gotten engaged (I would avoid consulting Wilde too closely on that institution), it felt obligatory to venture into the deeper trenches of the vaunted cool-climate region of northern France, and splurge on something more regal than our reliable Cave Spring Blanc de Blancs — a bottle which, at 30% the price of Louis Roederer, delivers something like 80% of the experience. In most circumstances, this kind of math is persuasive. But if there was ever a need to spend the big bucks on Champagne, this was it.

Under such pretenses, I went searching for something more interesting than the generic offerings of the major Champagne houses and eventually settled on La Maison Stanislas Bonafé, a boutique, terroir-focused producer founded by the former French equestrian whose name appears on the label. Bonafé apprenticed at several Champagne houses before establishing his own maison in 2010, and the bottle I ended up with was his 07 Grand Cru Cuvée, from the 2012 vintage. A blend drawn from seven Grand Cru villages and one that more than lives up to the designation.

At fourteen years old, the wine arrives with considerable maturity, immediately apparent in the glass. The colour is pale to medium gold. The rear label indicates a 2012 harvest and a 2023 disgorgement, meaning the wine spent more than 11 years aging on its lees — ample time to develop a personality analogous to John Candy; it is generous and unmistakably eager to please.

On the nose, it bursts with pronounced aromatic intensity, exuding the classic autolytic and malolactic markers of serious bubbly. A gentle swirl evokes freshly buttered brioche toast. But where this bottle distinguishes itself from many of the Champagnes I have tried is in the more complex, mature register beneath the bread. Candied orange peel, beeswax, honey, dried fig, and hazelnut, all integrated gracefully into the wine’s broader profile.

On the palate, the Stanislas Bonafé is a palpable indulgence, with a creamy, persistent mousse and an opulent range of flavours: lemon, baked apple, peach, apricot, candied citrus peel, honey, dried fig, toast, brioche, and hazelnut. The texture is rich and rounded, but generous acidity keeps the wine lifted and elegant.

This is unmistakably outstanding Champagne, and not an experience easily replicated by the traditional-method sparkling wines from other regions I have explored. I remain a fervent advocate for Ontario sparkling wine, but this was a welcome confirmation that Champagne’s reputation rests on more than mere marketing and brand recognition.

It is drinking beautifully now and paired perfectly with my decadent assortment of Miss Vickie’s potato chips and creamy mac and cheese. On Champagne, Wilde may have been right after all…

u/Harry1T6 — 13 days ago
▲ 15 r/wine

As an ardent evangelist for Ontario wines, I am always searching for new producers and bottles to rave about — partly from genuine conviction and partly because nothing delights me more than hearing skeptics concede that Niagara can compete with the best of them.

My latest discovery is a Riesling from winemaker Charles Baker. Also associated with Stratus Vineyards in Niagara-on-the-Lake, Baker has been crafting high-quality Riesling since 2005. The 2021 vintage from his beloved Picone Vineyard in Vinemount Ridge, perched along the edge of the Niagara Escarpment and further inland from Lake Ontario in West Niagara, is no exception.

Pale lemon in colour, the wine bursts from the glass with such aromatic intensity that even a modest swirl can feel like pressing your ear against a loudspeaker to hear a record — it is unmistakably loud. Before you even raise the glass to your nose, there is already a bouquet of classic petrol, citrus fruit, lemon, lime, nectarine, and orange peel presenting itself with great poise. There is also a delicate stone-fruit quality — underripe white peach, and even a hint of tropical, pineapple — giving the wine an impressive range of fruit character across the spectrum.

Beneath all that exuberant fruit lies a bright mineral component, something like wet stones or cool pebbles beneath a mountain stream, along with a delicate floral embellishment redolent of elderflower. This is not a shy wine.

On the palate, the wine is dry, with the slightest hint of residual sugar. The flavour profile largely mirrors the nose: citrus, stone fruit, minerality, and that floral lift. Most importantly, the wine’s generous gamut of complexity is braced by mouth-puckering acidity, ensuring fine balance across its structural components.

For a 2021 vintage, it still feels remarkably alive and youthful, with enough acidity and concentration to age comfortably for another decade. It could sit quite happily in your cellar, developing deeper petrol, honeyed citrus, and more savoury complexity with time — assuming, of course, you can muster the monastic discipline required not to drink it immediately. This is no easy feat.

Finally, the wine has outstanding flavour intensity, evidenced by how easy it is to write and rave about it. The best wines really are the ones that make the wine writer’s job the easiest. In this case, the aromas are so pronounced and sharp that even a lifelong cocaine addict’s benighted nose would have little difficulty identifying them.

All of these delightful flavours linger long on the palate. Though I have long since finished the bottle, I can still taste its quality — and can feel the irritation of not having another one close at hand. This is Ontario Riesling at its most persuasive. It is highly aromatic, precise, minerally expressive, and more than capable of making Niagara skeptics look foolish.

u/Harry1T6 — 24 days ago