u/Heavy_Plan7527

6 months of UGC, month by month breakdown (followers + income)

6 months of UGC, month by month breakdown (followers + income)

I started doing UGC for around 6 months now after I graduated. I didn't apply for any 9-5 right away and decided to try making money online first (I was right lol) and here's how my first 6 months of UGC went

Month 1: 0 followers, $0

I opened a brand new UGC instagram profile from scratch and the first thing I tried was Fiverr where I spent a good chunk of the month browsing and pitching, but got absolutely nothing out of it. Complete waste of time honestly, I just set up my Instagram with a UGC-focused bio and email, filmed a few sample videos with products I already owned, mostly skincare, put together a basic Canva portfolio and that’s it

Month 2: 1,984 followers, $0

I started to watch some videos on Youtube and I watched I think all the videos about UGC In that moment i switched strategy completely and started posting 2 reels a day, like skincare, morning routines, OOTDs. I grew to almost 2K followers just from being consistent. I have no client yet but the account was finally starting to look real, which is what I needed before pitching anyone seriously

Month 3: 2,300 followers, $650

Kept growing and forgot about Fiver and I closed my first deal with a cosmetics and skincare brand on sideshift. I closed 10 videos at $65 flat fee each, so $650 total plus a ton of free product lol. Maybe low rate but I didn't care, I finally had real client work and a real portfolio.

Month 4: 3,495 followers, $1,450

Flat fees crept up to the $65-80 range, but the bigger change was a brand offering me a CPM structure on top of the base fee, meaning they'd pay me $1 for every 1,000 views the video got. A couple videos hit around 80K views each so I started seeing actual performance bonuses on top of the flat, and started making good money from this.

Month 5: 8,460 followers, $3,200

Best month so far. I finally understood how to make hooks that actually work, and one video (not even a promo, just organic content UNFORTUNATELY!!) hit 1M views. That single video brought in 2,500 new followers on its own. With that traction I was able to raise my rates across the board, in fact one brand paid $200 flat plus a $1.70 CPM and that video hit 500K views, so that one deal alone paid out over $1,050. Never happened before and it changed my whole approach to pricing

Month 6: 10K+ followers, $5,500

Crossed 10K and everything shifted, a lot of brands started sliding into my DMs with sponsorship offers instead of me chasing them. I started monetizing stories with affiliate links too, but the real income was still coming from CPM campaigns. What made me realize that this job was not just a hype but a business over time, was closing few 6 month contracts with brands. This means a minimum video commitments per month plus the variable CPM on top, so now I have a guaranteed base income for the next 6 months with upside depending on performance.

Everyone (also me 6 months ago) think you need a huge following to make real money from content. You really don't, UGC model works completely differently from influencer marketing, brands pay for the content itself and the performance it drives, nobody cares about ur followers. It still takes time to figure out what works but if you actually enjoy filming and creating, it's worth trying.

u/Heavy_Plan7527 — 3 days ago

I want to share an interesting case study and know what the community thinks about it. Well, Picsart was facing a problem that a lot of apps are running into, the ad campaigns are getting more expensive across Meta and google, CPMs are rising and downloads are staying flat.

Sponsoring a product like Picsart is especially tricky with static creatives, since it's not intuitive to explain and it's hard to show the actual use case. Instead of burning money on creatives with high CPMs, they decided to scale distribution volume by running a UGC campaign through Sideshift. They brought in a huge number of creators and focused the content on showing the product actually being used, like a stunning photo getting retouched or an interesting app feature in action, and that's what made the content go viral.

They flooded TikTok with content, some videos went viral, others performed normally, but the result was mass distribution across both TikTok and Instagram. After 6 months they got:

  • 185M total views
  • 13,500 posts published
  • $400k total spend so $2.16 CPM
  • Top 10-25 App Store for 5 consecutive months

The $2.16 CPM is the key metric because for a mobile app campaigns on Meta hovers around $8-14 CPM depending on targeting.

So thanks to this UGC campaign, they saved a lot of money and growth organically

What made it work was:

1. Product-Focused videos: The hook was always the editing moment, the before/after, the transformation, so they focused on a good feature

2. Go with the gut: 13,500 posts over 6 months is roughly 72 posts per day You can't get there with a curated influencer approach. Lots of the success of this was driven by the creativity of the creators itself and good idea sourcing processes

3. Mass distribution: High volume... Really really high. By the law of large numbers, out of a huge amount of content, some of it is bound to go viral.

Source: https://sideshift.app/casestudies/picsart

u/Heavy_Plan7527 — 22 days ago
▲ 208 r/jobs

I only found out because a company I was interviewing with told me something felt “off” after they spoke to my previous manager. This is someone I worked for over a year, delivered on everything, stayed late when needed, never caused issues. We didn’t end on great terms, but nothing that would justify trying to block me from getting another job.

At first I was just confused. Then it hit me how unfair it is that one person can basically shape how others see you without you even being in the room. No context, no chance to respond, just their version of you.

What bothers me the most is that it makes you question everything. Was I actually bad and didn’t realize it, or is this just someone being bitter? And either way, I’m the one paying for it.

I know I’m not the only one this has happened to. References are supposed to help, not become a personal weapon. Just needed to get this off my chest because it genuinely messed with my head.

reddit.com
u/Heavy_Plan7527 — 22 days ago

I spent the last few weeks actually testing these instead of just reading landing pages, because the space has gotten crowded and most roundups feel like they were written by someone who never opened the product.

I run support ops for a mid-size SaaS, around 3k active users, so the ticket volume isn't our main problem. The problem is repetitive questions that eat agent time, users who drop off before getting an answer, and handoffs that lose context halfway through.

I tought (wrongly) that an AI chatbot would immediately deflect tickets. Some tools created more work because they escalated too aggressively or hallucinated product-specific answers. That forced me to actually think about what each tool is good at.

Chatbase: Best for teams that want a trained assistant without an engineering team This one ended up higher on my list than I expected, you can build a chatbot trained directly on your own content docs, PDFs, URLs, help center articles and it stays on topic because it only answers from what you fed it. No hallucinated pricing, no wrong feature descriptions

Intercom Fin: Very good for in-product support tied to user context. It's good when support needs to reflect what the user has actually done inside the product. The downside is that you're paying Intercom prices for the full platform whether you use it or not.

Zendesk AI: Reccomended for large teams with existing Zendesk infrastructure, adds intelligent routing, sentiment detection, suggested replies. Makes a mature support operation smarter, if you're starting from scratch maybe is not good for u

Freshdesk Freddy: for early stage teams that want something simple, it covers the basics auto assignment, suggested replies, FAQ deflection. It’s reliable and affordable, nothing crazy

Tidio: Very good for ecommerce-adjacent SaaS or small teams Strong live chat base with AI layered on top. Good if your users expect fast real time responses and you have a small team covering multiple channels.

Your team maybe dont need a sophisticated AI agent. An Ai Agents should handles the repetitive 60% of questions accurately so humans can focus on the 40% that actually require judgment.

reddit.com
u/Heavy_Plan7527 — 24 days ago