u/Historical_Cut_679

I recently went through an interview process for a Commodities Structuring role at Morgan Stanley, and honestly, it was quite different from what I expected.

I had prepared extensively on topics directly related to the role, such as derivatives, risk management, and commodities markets. I spent time reviewing hedging strategies, understanding market dynamics like oil pricing and contango, and making sure I was comfortable with structuring concepts.

However, the interview took a very different direction.

Most of the questions I received were actually focused on logic and reasoning. They were more like puzzles or structured thinking exercises rather than technical finance questions.

As a result, I left the interview with the feeling that I didn’t perform as well as I could have. Not necessarily because I couldn’t solve the problems, but mainly because I wasn’t prepared for that type of questioning.

What really surprised me was how central these logic questions were. I initially thought they would only be a small part of the interview, but in reality, they made up a significant portion of it.

That being said, I’m still wondering if this is typical for this kind of role. I didn’t expect such a strong emphasis on logic questions for a structuring position in commodities.

If anyone has gone through similar interviews in structuring, trading, or commodities roles, I’d be really interested to hear your experience.

Overall, it was a great learning experience, and a reminder that preparation shouldn’t be limited to technical knowledge.

reddit.com
u/Historical_Cut_679 — 19 days ago