u/Hopeful-Climate-3848

I suppose this is both asking and asking for an economist.

I am neither an economist nor a mathematician - just an autistic idiot that happens to be good at solving certain types of problems.

The long and short of it is that I have proven EMH to be mathematically false, weak/semi strong/strong - all empirically incorrect.

I came up with an algorithm to (significantly) beat the market over time - as you're aware considered impossible in polite society.

A few pre-emptive rebuttals to the usual slogans;

1. I am using the largest (by assets) ETFs that represent the market itself (SPY/QQQ/IWM/VTI from their inception) there are no 'factors' or 'risk' to hide behind and obviously there is no leverage involved.

2. It is not data mining, there is an underlying logic to it.

3. It's not HF.

Although strangely there is some evidence in favour of efficient pricing in my work.

I am in the UK under the yoke of dim witted EU PRIIP regulations, so I'm banned from 'just doing it myself' and it's abundantly clear that no one at any financial institution will talk to me.

The algorithm is evidently worthless to me, so it makes sense to publish it.

Whilst I appreciate there's a symbiotic relationship between academia, the promotion of EMH and the production of underperforming professional money managers - I am naively seeking a Ramanujan/Hardy situation, wherein I eventually defecate myself to death.

And it better not be more shite about how the Chinese have funny names.