u/Human-Economics6894

What would life be without the opportunity to make stupid decisions? (Neil Sean's gossips)

What would life be without the opportunity to make stupid decisions? (Neil Sean's gossips)

I would never make fun of the fact that Harry and Claw make bad decisions, because I have the same problem myself. But their case is truly worthy of study in psychiatry schools; after all, you might make one bad decision, or two or three... but making bad decisions every single week for over six years? That’s a lot of weeks, isn't it? 😁

MARKLE WILL SAY SORRY BUT FIRST THIS LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiQRLqgoblw

https://preview.redd.it/iu0glk5mziuh1.png?width=1217&format=png&auto=webp&s=1a4dc6ce20d58ad11fb88a7b6bad8f2512d0b885

Sean has spent many years in the scene where Claw moves. Many years. So he knows that Claw would eat one of her chocolates before actually apologizing.

Sean knows the Harkles aren't going to apologize, and he has consistently said so for a long time. The Harkles will do what they always do: if you feel offended, it's your fault.

That didn't happen.

And if it did, it wasn't that bad.

And if it was, that's not a big deal.

And if it is, that's not my fault.

And if it was, I didn't mean it.

And if I did, you deserved it.

https://preview.redd.it/y2pisvle1juh1.png?width=420&format=png&auto=webp&s=14b554509c232c745f866e5373aa2e23ec4de9a2

Claw—and Harry, too—fall into that category. They are always the victims; they are always the ones who have been wronged. They always have to be the ones receiving support because everyone is attacking them.

That makes what Ari Emanuel said—that he’s happy Claw is no longer his problem—even funnier. Because let’s be clear about one thing: Emanuel is a narcissist, and he works with narcissists all day long (because that’s what an agency like WME is: a club for narcissists).

If someone like him can't stand Claw anymore, whose fault is it?

...

...

...

Well, obviously... Ari Emanuel's!

Claw is deeply hurt by what Emanuel said.

Sean says it must be really difficult working for the Harkles. Claw is rude to the staff in ways that are truly draining, and Harry is exhausting because he believes—just like Claw—that the world MUST revolve around them.

You might scoff at this, but it is a fact that King Charles III hasn't given up hope that Harry will mature. Yet, after those 47 minutes at Highgrove, the only impression left on him was that he won't be alive for the hundred years it will take Harry to grow up. Because, looking at what happened with that masterclass, Harry definitely hasn't learned a thing.

The most annoying thing about all this is the fact that Harry thinks he is the only one who lost a loved one as a child.

I was five years old when my first grandmother died; I remember everything about that day—everything. My Aunt Leontina, who is nearly 100 years old, lost a daughter in an accident 60 years ago, and she has carried that grief with her every single day since. People here—yesterday and on other occasions—have spoken about the pain of losing a parent during childhood. Sean himself often thinks of his parents. Do any of us want to hear advice from a guy who spent 20 years with his brain cells fried from everything he smoked, consumed, and drank?

And when we consider Harry’s atrocious behavior on the very day—and at almost the exact time—the Queen passed away—the way he shouted at his father and saw fit to make demands—does Harry really have the audacity to believe he can teach anyone how to cope with something?

That attitude of Harry’s really bothers Sean. Because everything is always about Harry. He was the one who suffered through Diana’s death—not his aunts Sarah and Jane, not his brother William. Only him.

The thing is, if you compare the current video with the previous ones, Harry is giving exactly the same speech. And Sean doesn't get that: didn't he see that this was precisely the moment to turn the narrative around?

https://preview.redd.it/0z702vt95juh1.png?width=1110&format=png&auto=webp&s=17f3e1a20f016c5020cc869ff4c73c1328cb12ad

Harry and Claw also believe they have been wronged. And they have no intention of changing that narrative.

Sean has made two things clear in many videos: 1) the Harkles want the BRF to apologize to them, and 2) Sean is skeptical of much of what appears in the newspapers—having worked for several himself, he can smell when a published story doesn't quite add up.

The other day, Sean was making fun of the *Express*—which is in crisis—for resorting to publishing a story about how Claw might want to apologize. Since no one is willing to name names regarding that, it’s just "gossip."

That said, the Harkles constantly need to shift the focus with nonsense like those articles. Because Sean—who knows full well who took the pub photos—said the very day they came out that the deal only covered their arrival at the pub... not them leaving together. That image was supposed to dispel the notion that their marriage is in crisis, but the fact is that Harry looked uncomfortable and like he was being forced to do it.

https://preview.redd.it/jley8k707juh1.png?width=554&format=png&auto=webp&s=d3ebc26c1883c556161e02b64210000bd91b91ca

Well, now *People* magazine has published an article about it. And Sean says this one is actually credible, because *People* has a direct line to the Harkles, so it’s obvious that the source was the Harkles themselves.

https://preview.redd.it/kvee5qzm7juh1.png?width=388&format=png&auto=webp&s=145bf02d409616efc626fa1e4aa3530c33c823ec

https://people.com/prince-harry-meghan-markle-not-planning-apology-prince-william-kate-middleton-source-exclusive-12163162

Basically, that article says it’s nonsense for the Harkles to be planning an apology.

And according to an excellent source of Sean’s, the thing is—no, no, no—there will never be an apology from the Harkles until someone from the BRF publicly comes to Claw’s defense, admitting how hard things were for her during her time in the UK and confirming that everything she said in the Oprah interview was true.

Harry, on the other hand, has no plans to apologize either. He wants to show the world that he has changed—that both he and Claw have changed—through sheer hard work, doing good, and moving forward.

...

...

...

https://preview.redd.it/rmusojgv8juh1.png?width=630&format=png&auto=webp&s=ab5239a04931ca2b8937965369154ceeea5bbc59

That said, Sean isn't claiming the *Express* article was made up; it came from somewhere. The fact that *People* magazine dismissed it doesn't change the fact that the *Express* didn't just invent the story.

Sean says he leans toward *People*'s version of events, because it’s a fact that the Harkles will never apologize until *they*—the victims—receive an apology. Sean must be bored with this, seeing as he’s been... um, repeating the same thing for nearly three years now. Long live the evolution of the Harkles!

https://preview.redd.it/2lc6kk1p9juh1.png?width=700&format=png&auto=webp&s=8cb7865092b042eabe7783b68f99e26069212ee9

HARRY'S MELTDOWN INSISTING ON THIS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93g1NP81KGI

Sean has been consistent in this regard as well.

Harry is not mentally well. That doesn't mean he doesn't try to manipulate people and the like, but he isn't mentally well. He crumbles under the slightest pressure. And that happens because he has a low tolerance for frustration, which is a problem.

And Harry's obsession with talking yet again about how much he has suffered is unhealthy.

Right now, Harry is very frustrated because nothing has gone the way he wanted. Everything has gone wrong.

Things started off on the wrong foot the moment Harry returned to the UK. After all, the press was obviously tipped off—Harry had security—and now that they are living rent-free in a heavily guarded mansion, they have once again resorted to using paparazzi to take "spontaneous" photos; naturally, the paparazzi now want credit because they want to sell the pictures.

But none of that is benefiting Harry. Not even the fact that his uncle Spencer is exploiting his mother, Diana. The funny thing is that Spencer is reaping more benefits from it than Harry himself.

Even when Spencer has lied, and even fired shots at Anne. Now, it’s not unusual for Princess Anne to make a biting remark, but for Spencer to hold a grudge over it is... it’s just so damn stupid!

In one passage of his book, Spencer described the days leading up to Charles and Diana's wedding in 1981, including a formal meal held at Buckingham Palace in the days prior.  Spencer recalled how, to his "alarm", he was sat next to the Princess Royal and asked her how her daughter Zara Tindall's christening went. He alleged that Anne gave a "withering" response that made him feel "small", writing: "I expected her to run away with the happy topic of her baby Zara's baptism. "But instead, she stopped, looked at me witheringly, and asked, 'Tell me, how's a christening supposed to go?'"

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Take Mike Tindall, for example. In 2011, by which time he was already Anne's son-in-law, he captained the England rugby team in a match against Scotland—a nation whose rugby union has had Anne as its patron since 1986. Mike greeted the Rugby Union officials before receiving the trophy from his mother-in-law. Tindall believes that Princess Anne was clearly unimpressed with his behavior and urged him to speed up his victory lap. He added: "She was like, 'Move on, Michael.' I was like, 'Debrief over lunch tomorrow?' and she said, 'Move on, Michael.'"

https://preview.redd.it/ga7nhwj1fjuh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=3e1d8b2f67de107816df74b2ca77fc69a8cb16a0

Sean says Spencer is in desperation mode, looking for a reaction. From Anne?

https://preview.redd.it/bha3qi2egjuh1.png?width=512&format=png&auto=webp&s=249decadb724c30810497a3091ab0bbec8cc6684

Sean says it’s a terrible idea to go up against her. And I believe him, because she’s the type who shoots straight for the brain—she doesn’t leave anyone wounded.

Harry is reportedly preparing to become a professional speaker.

https://preview.redd.it/k9tjgl21hjuh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=a3012ffbd59f5deba38e42008a62f9c2256eb214

The thing is, Harry is trying to raise the cash to pay what he owes the *Daily Mail*. Sean says it’s not a matter of him staying quiet; rather, the exact amount they have to pay will be revealed on October 22. From what Sean says, it looks like the figure will exceed 25 million, so they are currently looking into the payment structure and the timing of the settlement. Sean says he has this information from a very reliable source.

That said, as always, Harry has of course made headlines... for the wrong reason.

https://preview.redd.it/tu57d0bmhjuh1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=6d1cb80c55f00b5e76b3a94c90451c7b74b198cf

Exactly—his head. Not what’s inside—we know it’s empty in there—but the fact that it looks like he has hair. That wasn't visible when Claw was opening that basket of products and Harry was standing there barefoot, wearing an old T-shirt and shorts.

https://preview.redd.it/283suj08ijuh1.png?width=1022&format=png&auto=webp&s=46a4603f21ab441fb13cdc93c166a85c40d0bb5f

Sean has been told that Harry is very sensitive about that situation—specifically, how his hair looks in photos. That is why it is quite curious that Harry appears with more hair in the MasterClass promotional photo.

https://preview.redd.it/0lmw91yjijuh1.png?width=480&format=png&auto=webp&s=396b1a05236c4d1700e558791966232da50bc0f2

Sean says people have paid more attention to that than to what Harry said. It's because that's more fun 😁😁😁

MARKLE MYSTERY IN LONDON REVEALED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urnSETh7mRk

Claw never gives up. Claw strives to be constantly in the news—even for the wrong reasons.

And Sean is right: Claw might want to tell the difficult story of how she built As Ever from scratch—which is why you have to buy her wickless candles—but then she’s dining at a five-star hotel wearing £28,000 worth of clothes.

Sean says Claw dresses that way to get attention. Claw doesn't care whether it's good or bad, as long as people are talking about her.

https://preview.redd.it/4z4e9mz4kjuh1.png?width=829&format=png&auto=webp&s=ac2143d5710ce512f98ac0a0de22b71696340bc0

Was that thing from Ralph Lauren????

Sean says that Claw is not managing to sell its products.

That’s not the case with the Claridge. Sean says the afternoon tea is excellent—expensive, but excellent. Plus, they give you a gift bag, which Sean took with him since he hadn't paid for the tea himself 🤣🤣.

The honey at that hotel comes from various places across the UK, and the current manager is marketing-savvy.

Now for the inside scoop: the day after Claw visited the hotel, a full package of "As Ever" jams and products arrived. Sean is very clear about it: jams, candles, and bookmarks—that’s what arrived at the Claridge in Mayfair. He is very specific about this. "Someone" had sent it. Could it have been a gesture of thanks for the treatment received the day before? Sean doesn't rule that out, but the fact is that Claw wants to negotiate with Claridge's to get them to carry "As Ever" products.

For those who missed the scoop: look for yesterday's post. Sean said Claw wanted to get his jam onto the breakfast tables at those places.

https://preview.redd.it/ps27gl5wljuh1.png?width=615&format=png&auto=webp&s=ed7c4c9bad0798b30a35377adf0fb7b8dfc457ec

Mind you, Sean clearly says that isn't going to happen. His point is that Claw genuinely believes she is so incredibly special that the Claridge is dying to have "As Ever" jam in its catalog.

KING'S LETTER MEANT NOTHING- CALL ME DUCHESS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K50EO-SotW4

People ask, "Why isn't KC3 saying anything?"

KC3 has just stated clearly: the Harkles are private citizens.

Why don't people get the message?

Then again, Claw doesn't get the message either. For starters: she looked awful in front of the Claridge.

https://preview.redd.it/upx4v6canjuh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=7bdcbe9b54d409a6fa617a942b43352057c34d52

Sean thinks that outfit would have looked good on Kate. I think that outfit wouldn't suit anything that's alive. Not even zombies.

Neither Harry nor Claw has a clear role in their lives. But it’s all their own fault.

Well, the thing is, Kelly McKee Zajfen came to the UK to help Claw get in touch with certain people. That was her role.

https://preview.redd.it/i7fr9yg7pjuh1.png?width=1217&format=png&auto=webp&s=b751b595423ccad2f1bb623aaeddf4ed0ff572b7

But as Sean already mentioned, the Harkles are looking for someone to support them. This brings to mind the Sussex Survivors' Club in the UK.

And the club keeps gathering more and more members.

https://preview.redd.it/llnduj2wpjuh1.png?width=771&format=png&auto=webp&s=b2bb77b70a6baf23ce79f4c466058cb9c69a3497

The thing is, no matter how much the Harkles pay to have a British assistant, their bad reputation is too widely known.

Especially because that person would have to present marketing ideas to position the "Duchess."

Yes, Claw is using the title. Sean says the Claridge's staff was instructed to call her Duchess. Several people curtsied to her.

So, the person who works for her must know how to deal with someone of that caliber.

https://preview.redd.it/gl9wd6ltqjuh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=bc2978ab396f661b3ecc5092b3778d9206a41f0b

Sean makes it clear that this piece of gossip is well and truly confirmed, as it is a widely discussed topic—specifically within marketing and image agency circles. Sean has already said that the issue goes back to before the Harkles returned to the UK. In other words, nobody wants to work for Claw.

https://preview.redd.it/qsp2f0g4rjuh1.png?width=634&format=png&auto=webp&s=c34d74b5c5cc2dd8faa2c0f4fde0b2b9589f56b4

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 6 days ago

There are people who, the moment you see them, you know you want to spend the rest of your life... without ever seeing them again. (Neil Sean's gossips)

HARRY BUSTED THE HIGHGROVE AGREEMENT VIA THIS MEGA LEAK

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaUO59zF1eE

Many people pointed out that Neil Sean had contradicted himself, as he had claimed Claw never wanted to return to the UK—yet now she is there.

The problem isn't Sean; it's Claw. Based on information from Montecito staff, Sean holds a firm belief that Claw has no desire to live in the UK. In fact, he predicted she wouldn't hesitate to stage a public appearance tied to the children's schooling or security. His insistence on this point stems from a very logical reason: Claw’s refusal to let Archie attend King Charles III’s coronation alongside Harry, citing the absurd excuse that it coincided with the boy's birthday.

https://preview.redd.it/5thgqzc0wxsh1.png?width=1264&format=png&auto=webp&s=b14ee06ed61db0a4656e36b2b9636d45bc5b8376

And Claw and Harry will have to deal with the fact that Archie will see—because he *will* see—photos of his cousins ​​there; [he’ll wonder] why he wasn’t there. That is inevitably going to happen very soon if Archie keeps attending a British school. And Sean asks: what explanation will they give? That Claw was making a lemon cake?

Sean says the Sussex children are a ticking time bomb.

Claw is angry because they’ve been—yes, almost a month—in the UK; it’s been over a month since the meeting at Highgrove, and KC3 is still ignoring them. In her anger, Claw does a lot of foolish things, the biggest being talking about that encounter at the event just to show off, without realizing that Martha Stewart would spill the beans. The agreement was "not to talk" about the matter, and Claw broke it. So, from the Palace's perspective, it’s absurd for her to be angry. But that’s typical of narcissists, isn't it?

https://preview.redd.it/tosl86oqxxsh1.png?width=921&format=png&auto=webp&s=69e754e177dc647b96251c5f24e94235aed91e22

Sean wonders if Claw has some sort of condition, because logically they could have kept a low profile, but Claw can't stand keeping a low profile.

Let’s get back to the subject Claw is most obsessed with: the photos.

Sean confirmed that photos were indeed taken—though not many—and made it clear that they featured Harry and the children; Claw was just in the way.

Claw doesn't understand why they haven't been published with a caption like "Grand Reconciliation."

Charles Spencer is another one who is going off the rails. Sean is scathing about Tina Brown: you weren't Diana's friend, because friendship cannot exist between journalism and fame—one is merely a useful tool for as long as one is needed. Yet there was Tina Brown—Diana's "friend"—with Spencer. And Spencer isn't staying silent.

Where do the two stories collide?

With the Diana documentary.

According to Sean’s source, when the Harkles were at Highgrove, King Charles III asked them about their intentions—since rumors had been circulating for a year that Harry wanted to make a documentary about his mother—and they apparently said no, that they had no skeletons in the closet, that they didn't plan to do anything, that they weren't going to do it, and so on.

Yet, not even a day later—remember, the Harkles spent just 47 minutes at Highgrove before heading to Althorp—Charles Spencer and his fourth wife were told about the Diana documentary that Harry *does* want to make.

And Charles Spencer said that Harry spoke about that documentary.

So, did the Harkles lie to KC3?

https://preview.redd.it/t6hhgv4pzxsh1.png?width=672&format=png&auto=webp&s=2b0b7f2ae7dc2a3873d4fee7c11fe5d3efdfb67a

Sean says it in a mocking tone, but the fact is, things couldn't have gone any other way. During the—I believe—two-hour journey between Highgrove and Althorp, it seems the Harkles changed their minds from "No, we’ll never make that documentary" to "Sure, we’d really love to do it."

Things are getting juicier 😈😈 because, as Sean has said, Harry hasn't managed to get anyone talking about Diana, but his uncle might be promoting the paperback edition of *Swan Song* next year—between June and August—with more revelations. In other words, Harry has... no, he doesn't have a year anymore; he has less than nine months to get that documentary ready and sold before August 31, 2027. Meanwhile, his uncle plans to keep slinging more mud at KC3. And Harry actually told that uncle about the documentary—only for the uncle to inadvertently expose the fact that Harry lied to his father. Yet again.

Sean—who has a very reliable source here 😉😉😉—says that this whole affair didn't go down well at Highgrove. It’s not that KC3 is worried about yet another documentary on Diana; there are hundreds of them. He is angry because Harry and Claw arrived at Highgrove claiming they were looking for a fresh start, a new chapter, or whatever you want to call it.

https://preview.redd.it/aey5i50k1ysh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=5db9bb633015fa1508f18443fee157cb608fd64d

And that is how the Highgrove agreement fell apart.

It was an agreement Camilla never believed the Harkles would actually honor. Staying silent, respecting the Royal Family, behaving themselves? That is why Camilla never left KC3 alone—something that really annoyed the Harkles, because Sean says that, for some reason, they wanted ten minutes alone with KC3. If the Harkles thought that in ten minutes KC3 would change the heir and make Harry the new Prince of Wales, they were sorely mistaken 🤭🤭🤭.

SUSSEX SECURITY DRAMA - POLICE NOW ADVISE THIS TO “PRIVATE CITS”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO6PsTiuUC4

Sean said that the issue that caused the Harkles to move to the UK wasn't Harry's visa. And it turned out he was right, because Harry was in NY without any issues.

Sean also said the problem wasn't money. And it seems that while they aren't Jeff Bezos, they don't shop at Walmart... yet 😈

Sean has been hinting—since he claims he cannot legally say more—that the matter involves a lawsuit filed against the Harkles by former employees. Some here have commented that this doesn't sound all that bad. However, reports that James Corden had been rude at a restaurant ended up undermining his standing in the U.S., and he, too, eventually returned to the UK. Ellen DeGeneres saw her show get cancelled. These are not good times to be rude to staff. Piecing together the gossip Sean has been doling out in dribs and drabs, he has hinted that the situation appears very ugly and that the Harkles intended to resolve it behind the scenes—which would explain that six-month stay.

But Sean has also made it clear that the fact is, we don't actually know why the Harkles returned to the UK. He has heard gossip, but the true reasons are known only to the Harkles and Markus Anderson.

Sean was already mocking the fact—more than a year ago—that Harry said he wanted his son to receive an English education, given that Harry himself was such a poor student and had complained that his own school days were miserable.

And the question is, what are the Harkles doing in the UK? Is Claw going to do some Christmas special in the Cotswolds? Because that would explain her horrible £130 Advent calendar.

Do I need a chocolate advent calendar? Ferrero Rocher

https://preview.redd.it/u4k8b2h25ysh1.png?width=348&format=png&auto=webp&s=8e9c55da560199e7841c4c664e39ab737cc09e19

https://preview.redd.it/ed2ikb0r5ysh1.png?width=320&format=png&auto=webp&s=c07780c1cdc0c7ee7af2286f2e65ceda44caf1b8

Ferrero Rocher, una expresion de buen gusto 🤭🤭🤭 If there are any Spaniards here, they'll understand. Anuncio Ferrero Rocher con Isabel Preysler (Una expresión de buen gusto)

£130 is excessively expensive for what Claw is offering. Especially since so many people deeply disliked the chocolate Claw had made; everyone said the packaging was nice, but the taste wasn't.

But the point is, Sean was right—it was only a matter of 3,2,1... before the Harkles cooked up some security issue involving the kids. Sean has made several videos mocking the fact that no paparazzi know what those children look like, since all we ever see is the backs of their heads.

What surprises Sean is that the press sided with the Harkles—it was good drama. Especially *Hello* magazine.

Sean made it clear yesterday that no one in the area or at the school found out about the matter—which is curious, given that a strange van was supposedly in the area for two hours.

That’s what Harry’s security team said... the same team that "tested" the school route in July. Smart folks—they’ve clearly never left the house in September.

https://preview.redd.it/jldgw02m7ysh1.png?width=465&format=png&auto=webp&s=8c8167fcc1982b44d24ffce56acb24db53406037

Sean says Harry should ask himself just how smart his security team is. Well, they surely have a couple more brain cells than Harry does. They actually have a job 🤣🤣🤣

The paparazzi story has been falling apart. Sean contacted not only the school but also the Gloucester police—with whom he has a very good relationship and who cover that specific area—to find out what happened. And no, there is no investigation; they just took a look into it. And it seems—please let this be true 😁😁—it seems the police told Harry to be more careful, do they want security? Then don't post things on social media. Especially considering there are many people in the area who are far more famous and haven't had issues with their children.

In other words, it seems the police have no intention of playing along. After all, aren't they private citizens? The police told Sean there was nothing concrete, and nothing came of it.

SUSSEX SECRETLY PLAN UK EXIT - WILL SHE COME BACK? LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGzN023CzPI

Sean won't say anything against Seamus because they are friends.

https://preview.redd.it/8ryu4esi9ysh1.png?width=683&format=png&auto=webp&s=cc5d391bc5cb4adc9a2814d59514c0f82ab8de2b

But the fact is that Harry was finally taking center stage. He—and he alone—was the focus. And it seems that was what Harry had been missing, to the point where he even spoke to journalists—and in high spirits, too—which took them by surprise.

In all this, Claw is the one in control. Harry doesn't mind that when he can dodge responsibility, but he does when it comes to these events.

Harry is gaining a measure of control because he is finally doing things he enjoys. In doing so, he wants to show KC3 that he is a viable asset to the monarchy. Harry doesn't understand why they don't call him; he hasn't understood it for years.

Claw doesn't want to be called upon. She wants the title, but not the job.

It seems Harry has made it clear to many people that he believes things could turn in his favor if he appears at certain events. Harry believes he is only two events away from KC3 changing his mind. That would explain the NATO situation.

No, Sean isn't saying this is new gossip; it’s the fact that Harry hinted at this during the Invictus event a couple of weeks ago.

The problem is that reality clashes with that fantasy. To begin with, there is the *Daily Mail* matter. It isn't over yet; in fact, the case looks set to conclude on October 22... provided no one appeals. And it appears that the other plaintiffs not only have no intention of appealing but are actually negotiating payment terms with the *Daily Mail*—seemingly each on their own, without informing the others.

Sean also says there are problems at As Ever.

Harry believes the UK is the place to reinvent himself, to get back on the right track... something Claw has no desire to do. She doesn't want to help him with anything. She doesn't want to get involved because the whole UK trip is only temporary. The idea was for the whole matter to be resolved by October—meaning the King would forgive them, they would become the most beloved figures, and everything would work out.

That said, the Harkles will be heading back to Montecito in a couple of weeks.

https://preview.redd.it/tv6xeqnddysh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=8257c78b9bbdedede7b73da6959e585e9a4afd4e

HARRY’S DRAMATIC U TURN OVER THIS HYPED MOVE - REASON IS REVEALED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-YrYItCTno

While Uncle Spencer keeps spouting things that aren't really shocking anyone—since he’s just rehashing a thirty-year-old story known to be untrue—Harry is hell-bent on returning to the royal fold and forcing William to accept him, even if it means doing so by sheer force.

https://preview.redd.it/7poovq0slysh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=6f4e19027077428fec69a3996e1b8524ab07c266

And he wants to make the documentary. But Harry can't find anything worth saying. He can't find anyone willing to talk about Diana, and they don't want to be part of the circus.

Harry has been jumping from one idea to another. Now he plans to do something positive regarding Diana's life... meaning he intends to overlook the secret car rides, the affairs, and so on. Who knows what he’ll want next week.

Harry might think this will convince William to get involved. He doesn't know William.

Amidst all this, Harry has commitments for Invictus that coincide with Camilla’s 80th birthday. Sean suggests the Invictus dates could have been moved, but Harry has absolutely no intention of making a gesture toward Camilla.

So, if Harry still wanted a royal family member to attend Invictus... well, that is a disastrous idea. And the truth is, Harry isn't really concerned about what happens in July, either. He is more interested in presenting Diana in a positive light—at Camilla's expense.

https://preview.redd.it/0n5rxnj6oysh1.png?width=931&format=png&auto=webp&s=693deac01b937e377489ec8722dfb6e993fb8cb0

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 14 days ago

Newspapers are the railways of lies. (Jules d'Aurevilly, Neil Sean's gossips)

Jules Barbey d'Aurevilly (1808–1889) was a French novelist, short story writer, and literary critic, known as the "dandy among dandies" and the "Constable of Letters." He exerted great influence on later authors such as Marcel Proust and Henry James.

AUTUMN CHILLS ALREADY…HAPPY FAMILIES NEVER LAST LONG WITH MARKLES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgP_PEZ6n34

This is what the quote is about.

Sean has been going hard at the BBC for quite some time, but he has also been criticizing the fact that the mainstream media doesn't bother to verify information before breaking a story. It’s gossip, sure, but sometimes the press lends it a level of credibility that isn't real.

Did they approach Fergie to write a book about Epstein and the British Royal Family? Yes.

Would they pay her a seven-figure sum? No.

https://preview.redd.it/kkl5u5r82rrh1.png?width=726&format=png&auto=webp&s=9bd5e59669637b68eb7175234548689cf3490d28

Sean has already confirmed that, yes, Fergie was indeed offered those kinds of deals... but—as Sean has previously stated (you can check past videos)—there is a major problem with Fergie: she is a huge liar. And the Epstein case would require extensive verification and evidence—things Fergie lacks.

Now, according to Sean's source, the idea behind leaking that tidbit was to divert attention from the bad press *Swan Song* has received. In other words: "Look, it could be worse—Fergie could write a book."

Now, according to Sean's source, the idea behind leaking that bit of gossip was to divert attention from the bad press *Swan Song* has received. In other words: "Look, things could be worse—Fergie could write a book."

That’s why Sean says that if the story had been true, it would have been published by the editor of *The Sun*, not the American editor. It’s just a matter of figuring out who actually planted the rumor.

https://preview.redd.it/mcxrazuc4rrh1.png?width=493&format=png&auto=webp&s=b8df86cde7283e85ed7f4924c7a05510802c33e2

The only thing Fergie can sell is salacious gossip. Nothing else.

On the other hand, there are the Harkles and Uncle Spencer. Claw—that mother so concerned about her own children—has no qualms about showing her friends' children online.

https://preview.redd.it/w01tzrhx4rrh1.png?width=387&format=png&auto=webp&s=1af69f0c9576f91fdbb4043ae76d021eab6a41e0

Uncle Spencer—the side of the family Harry most resembles genetically—has said that Harry has no issue with the book *Swan Song*. Frankly, I believe that is true; the issue lies in the conclusion. Harry has no problem with it, and neither does William, since he hasn't said anything.

Then again, how could William have any objections if he hasn't read the book? And I doubt Harry has either, because it’s 296 pages long!!! And it’s already clear that Harry can barely manage to read two.

At this point, then, when one reads nonsense like this—uttered by someone like Scoobie Dumber—no further proof is needed to know it is a lie.

https://preview.redd.it/n4psedmx5rrh1.png?width=959&format=png&auto=webp&s=e66d826315c2ed3be450ef20ad1508281f8997aa

What's up with Scobie? Is he on steroids or what?

It is more plausible that KC3 is praying for Harry to take the surname Spencer, so that the matter becomes entirely Charles Spencer's problem.

But in reality, behind the scenes, Spencer is annoyed because the Harkles haven't given truly explicit and clear support for his book *Swan Song*.

Because this isn't support.

https://preview.redd.it/g915c0iq6rrh1.png?width=633&format=png&auto=webp&s=cf2ed4aeb11dd8dc9893bd972f3d34e61d92546b

Especially when Harry is using the controversy sparked by *Swan Song* to push his idea of ​​making the documentary about Diana.

The issue here—as Sean has already mentioned several times—is that Harry faces a problem: the people he would need to speak in that documentary won't do it. Harry's other alternative is to film at Althorp. And that means he needs Charles Spencer.

And now, his uncle is angry because Harry hasn't backed him.

But, as Sean previously noted, the conflict is that Harry is caught between a rock and a hard place. He can't openly support his uncle because that would mean severing the last remaining tie he has with KC3—and he needs that connection. Yet, he doesn't want to cut ties with his uncle either, because he needs him too.

https://preview.redd.it/96c4cl8c8rrh1.png?width=554&format=png&auto=webp&s=bdee4481910ddd9b01ee141cfddb8866f1e034d5

It does seem, however, that Harry would lean towards his uncle; so it looks like the Harkles are angling for a new invitation to Althorp—and a photo with the uncle and the new aunt, something casual.

Harry

Because Claw, as always in cases like this, will keep her distance. She doesn't want to get involved in this. She might go out with Ellen, but put her title of Duchess at risk?

Whichever side Harry takes in this, it’s bad for Claw. She’s only on his side when things are going well.

WILLIAM SHOWS HIS TRUE LOYALTY & LEAVES CHARLES STUNNED - LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNAqBjrnxHQ

It seems Uncle Spencer completely failed to gauge the consequences of this book. He thought he would receive the same level of support as Diana did with Andrew Morton. He miscalculated badly because people loved Diana—which is why they believed her—but over time, a side of Diana emerged that she hadn't wanted the public to see.

Claw, the niece-in-law, is another one who has no sense of judgment. Now she doesn't want to get dragged into the Swan Song controversy... yet she has no qualms about hanging out with a public stalker like Ellen. She didn't hesitate to remain associated with Chrissy Teigen, either.

However, Sean gets the impression that behind that encounter between Claw and Ellen lies the fact that Claw is actually seeking negative criticism. She doesn't want to be in the UK, but it turns out people haven't reacted as expected; they haven't booed her. It’s worse: people have ignored her. So, Claw is trying to stir up controversy to invite criticism, hoping to tell Harry, "Look how they hate me—I can't live here."

https://preview.redd.it/rg87680mcrrh1.png?width=878&format=png&auto=webp&s=214a5363155f9441bfb1d7578b53bc4906c41efe

That wasn't Charles Spencer's aim. But the truth is, it’s hard to know what he was aiming for. Because Sean is right: he could have simply released a book featuring previously unseen photos of Diana and a few brief anecdotes. Instead, he chose a negative approach—including dragging Raine Spencer’s name through the mud all over again. Sean knew Raine—he shared a lot of details in a video dedicated to her—and it was through Raine that Diana connected with Dodi. That is why Sean strongly disagrees with Spencer reviving the "wicked stepmother" narrative; doing so ignores the fact that she was subjected to a brutal campaign against her, even though John Spencer was the one truly at fault for everything.

https://preview.redd.it/di2yggs0errh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=45e78ffede8fe6982226a36d992f68d1c3d4eb1f

But amidst all this, one thing is certain: if Charles Spencer thinks William’s silence implies agreement, then he simply doesn’t know William.

William adopted a realistic view of his parents long ago. Diana was no saint, nor was Charles a victim. And the lessons King Charles III learned from that whole experience were, in fact, a great help to William.

Spencer wanted to involve William in all of this, but William wants nothing to do with it. He has always wanted to honor Diana’s legacy while leaving behind the controversies she became embroiled in—and what his uncle did was unforgivable to him.

So, according to Sean’s sources, William has cut ties with his uncle. It seems William has no intention whatsoever of forgiving what his uncle said about KC3.

According to that source (a source linked to Camilla—so if you’ve been following these posts, you know exactly who spoke), William doesn't understand why Charles Spencer felt the need to bring up such hostility toward KC3 when the book was supposed to be about Diana. Apparently, when Spencer mentioned the book to William, he said it would be more positive and so on. So, it seems William is very disappointed.

Charles Spencer has wanted to speak with William. But William doesn't want to talk to him—especially not while he is hosting Harry and Claw. Any conversation William has with his uncle would end up in *People* magazine within hours.

There is also the fact that the guy has just married someone William doesn't know. So, any conversation William might have with his uncle would be like walking through a minefield.

It is doubtful that William will forgive his uncle. This dashes Penguin's hopes—namely, that William would read the book and agree to provide a favorable quote. No, that isn't going to happen.

In fact, it seems it won't even be profitable for Penguin to release a paperback edition of *Swan Song*.

HARRY STORMS OFF STAGE NOW WAR WITH CLINTONS - LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xpGzK2YfCA

If the year had already been disastrous for Harry, he just had to make it even worse this week.

At this point, Sean is in favor of removing the Harkles from the royal website, but he—and I agree—says that even if that happens, people will still see Harry as a royal because he has been one his whole life. In other words, even if they strip him of his title, he will always be Prince Harry.

Harry

Because "Claw" is a different story. She isn't seen as a royal, or a princess, or anything of the sort. That’s why she clings to Harry like a tick.

But while Charles Spencer—who claims descent from the Stuarts—is having trouble with the Crown (a bad idea), Harry is adding new enemies to his list.

https://preview.redd.it/tbwx6edzhrrh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=7fb15f34a49a527dd1e5e6d77b577fa414f00a6c

The Clintons.

But I don't feel sorry for the Clintons. I mean, why the hell did they invite him? Why were they treated like royalty?

https://preview.redd.it/wyja7tziirrh1.png?width=1323&format=png&auto=webp&s=6c65eae1aa2bce669e38b5a60488cd3973ba3269

Harry wants that video forgotten, erased—he wants it to be as if he were never in New York.

Harry losing control.

And yes, Harry does believe it was sabotage.

https://preview.redd.it/yeq47703jrrh1.png?width=427&format=png&auto=webp&s=0fcf9ba67407e26f8526916706ec8e15e1fe0358

https://x.com/FayeArohanui/status/2103417309658575015

That is why Harry wants the Clintons to give a public explanation of what happened.

Harry wants a big public apology.

So far, the only thing Harry has obtained is this.

https://preview.redd.it/mr9mvleulrrh1.png?width=1299&format=png&auto=webp&s=963664b4ed83479881e11838a925bf361c53ce09

For him, that isn't enough because he wants to be a speaker, and he needs that job. And everything was ruined. Because of "someone."

Harry is unable to capitalize on that situation. And it is becoming clear that Harry is a bitter man—and lazy, too, because he could have memorized the speech. Or read it. William and Kate always carry their speeches on paper to avoid precisely this sort of thing.

SUSSEX TV ATTACK ON ROYALS IN US EXPOSED ON JUST HOW IT WORKS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oW1f37Z1pEE

But anyway, in the absence of the Clintons, Harry still has Disney-ABC on his side.

https://preview.redd.it/jyqj9jerprrh1.png?width=780&format=png&auto=webp&s=4ef159382cb4a44432b4c2cdf59c36fdee759127

There’s a documentary about the Harkles and their return to the UK. And Scoobie Dumber dropped the bombshell that KC3 and Harry share an affectionate bond.

Which isn't true; KC3 keeps his distance.

Claw is angry about that because KC3 was supposed to see her in July, realize what he had lost, and apologize to her.

Sean doesn't take part in these kinds of documentaries. He hates being told what to say. He has recounted on more than one occasion that, some time ago, he was offered a spot on a program but was required to speak positively about the Harkles. Sean refused, saying he would only do so if they actually did something right.

But usually, as Sean explains, they get asked, "Do you want to take part in such-and-such a documentary?" yet the title is never revealed, because that would give away the program's slant. And in the case of *Harry & Meghan: The Return of the Prince*, it is obvious that it will be pro-Harkle.

Sean says that when he’s told he’s being sought out for his expert opinion, it’s a red flag—because that’s not the real reason. First and foremost, it’s about the paycheck; secondly, what they’re after is reach across media and social networks. Consequently, they pay accordingly—a reasonable fee based on the idea that having a specific person on screen will get their followers to tune in.

Sean makes it clear that the interview he did with Disney for this documentary was very evasive.

So, when Sean kept asking, he was told it was a documentary about the Harkles—about their return to the UK, how delighted they are to be there, their recent reunion with the King, and how everything is forgiven.

And that’s when Sean said, "No."

They pressed him again and offered him more money, but Sean said no.

He wanted to know what he was getting into, as he already runs a YouTube channel that he insists remains free—without ads or the need to purchase anything—and he wants to retain an audience that watches him because he speaks his mind freely (something he has stated on several occasions). Sean has this platform because he knows what he’s talking about, takes responsibility for his words, and doesn’t have anyone telling him what to say.

That’s why Sean doesn’t like those shows: he accepts the money, they ask him a question, he answers, and what actually airs bears no resemblance to what he said.

The versions are manipulated, since documentary production companies ultimately make whatever edits they choose.

Sean, who has a reliable source close to KC3, makes it clear that there has been nothing of note regarding Harry since July 10. No calls, no messages, nothing at all. There is no meeting planned.

Sean makes it clear that if you want to have some fun, you can watch that documentary. But it won't contain a shred of truth.

https://preview.redd.it/7jhxqycfqrrh1.png?width=736&format=png&auto=webp&s=b4beaffff8a92acfb2c19e865bbbcf1fd69cee17

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 20 days ago

Wash, rinse, repeat (Neil Sean´s gossips)

WILLIAM'S NEXT SHOCK SUSSEX MOVE LOOMS - WEBSITE LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGC2ShHt2T8

Harry is furious.

That’s nothing new.

Harry blames his brother.

And that’s nothing new, either.

Ever since 2019, Harry has been determined to blame William for everything going wrong in his life and focused on ways to bring his brother down. So, who is surprised that Harry is once again devoting energy to attacking William?

https://preview.redd.it/39s197eeyroh1.png?width=1232&format=png&auto=webp&s=74dc65448c62da990d819afe50cf5407c9c75aa5

Obviously, there's always some clueless person 🤣🤣🤣

But in all seriousness... even though this is just gossip 🤭, the fact is that Harry is absolutely convinced that William was the one behind that infamous statement in which the King refers to them as "private citizens."

And the truth is... yes, William was clearly behind that statement. Charles has already said it: William is his closest and most valued advisor.

https://preview.redd.it/dream416zroh1.png?width=700&format=png&auto=webp&s=2fd1a64994c3f38bf15771bdf45a3adac5ede1c5

But Harry views William as the villain who is a bad influence on the King. Harry truly harbors a deep disdain for older people. He believed the Queen was being poorly influenced, and now he believes the same about Charles. The Queen was perfectly lucid—very lucid. And I see Charles the same way: extraordinarily lucid. The only one being poorly influenced is Harry.

Harry doesn't see it that way; for him, it was a blow to his ego to see William and Kate at a public event, especially after poor Harry had become the object of global ridicule.

https://preview.redd.it/65j917lyzroh1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=7b26ab27f112dda88f8fc08da9408fc38d50a2f6

Harry believes William has sown discord to turn Charles against him.

That hasn't been the case. Sean has been quite emphatic in pointing out that William has been very careful about the boundaries regarding what he tells his father about this—at least in public (meaning during meetings with advisors). And what Sean’s sources keep telling him is that the most William has said lately is "I told you so." William hasn't needed to sow discord; Harry has single-handedly turned Charles against himself.

The funny thing is, if William really had such a bad influence on Charles, Harry wouldn't even appear on the royal website.

Sean has already recounted how, for over a year, Harry has been calling practically every day demanding changes to his section of the royal website. He hates the photo, he hates the biography, he hates the reference to Sentebale—he hates everything about it. Claw is angry about her photo—because her bio doesn't list her achievements—and... yes, I’m going to believe Sean on this: because there’s been no mention of her Emmy nomination.

Sean is right about one thing, though: what’s left of the Harry coverage on that site looks like a coordinated attack on the Harkles. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

https://preview.redd.it/7pu6a26k4soh1.png?width=747&format=png&auto=webp&s=0556f3fd8017e0d1f4aa860e5406a8fa37681efa

William hates one thing: having the Harkles on the royal website.

But as Sean has explained, William is at odds with certain key aides, and Charles has tried to take a Solomonic approach: not removing Harry—so as not to trigger further hysterical tantrums—while allowing William some control over the content of Harry's biography.

And William has taken the opportunity to gradually prune Harry from the website. Previously, there were more images of his work from before Claw. Today, September 10, 2026, when you search for "Prince Harry," this is what appears.

https://preview.redd.it/vjg8xd5r2soh1.png?width=1288&format=png&auto=webp&s=c733b3c7f4dd13216fab5ec93ebd8be108ca48e4

It turns out it's not Prince Harry, but Prince Henry... and then this pops up.

https://preview.redd.it/aaituhl93soh1.png?width=1219&format=png&auto=webp&s=9d5fe29207e00cb497dbd23b14937fbb150d2a00

The little that remains of the old Harry is the announcement made when he and William established the Royal Foundation.

It surprised me because Sean is saying there is still some trace of Andrew left. I thought so too—that there might still be some news about Andrew's past activities... but no, there isn't any, at least not when using the search function. I’ve already searched for "Duke of York" and "Prince Andrew." The only thing that comes up is the statement from Buckingham Palace issued when Andrew "stepped back" from his titles.

What’s the scoop? Well, William is focused on giving the royal website a major makeover.

Sean makes it clear that these things happen automatically, but William has pointed out to the King that the website needs to be adapted to improve visibility—on mobile phones and the like. A good place to start is the "Royal Family" section itself, by making it more exclusive. However, to avoid major internal controversy, William intends to keep the Harkles included—but in a section designated for "family members." After all, Harry remains Charles's son, and both he and his children are still in the line of succession. The plan is simply not to list them in the "Royal Family" section or the "Royals of the Firm" section, because that is not what they are; they are private citizens.

https://preview.redd.it/aggxtwiu6soh1.png?width=576&format=png&auto=webp&s=57a0c85b45fef90c834c7d39a5cd28c258d56f19

Sean—who makes it clear that his information comes from a 100% reliable source—indicates that this does indeed seem likely to happen in the not-too-distant future, and that any references to Harry and his children will be strictly limited: simply mentioning their titles and their place in the line of succession. Nothing more.

That said, Sean notes that we shouldn't expect this to happen tomorrow. However, this rumor shouldn't be dismissed, as there has already been a significant "pruning" of news regarding Harry prior to the "Claw" era; coverage of him has been noticeably scaled back. It’s likely still in the site's archives, though accessing them isn't easy.

SUSSEXES - TRAPPED - SOLO MEETING & CONFUSION

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VduI1AM-2oQ

However, what the press says about what Harry believes, feels, or thinks—no, Harry doesn't think, but whatever his single brain cell is doing—is not what is actually happening.

Harry left the July 10th meeting believing the King was on his side. If I were estranged from my dad—having neither seen nor spoken to him in a long time—I wouldn't feel so triumphant over a 47-minute meeting. And on that note, don't forget that Sean had a truly excellent source for this—someone very close to the situation, whose name starts with "Tom" and ends with "Parker-Bowles." Sean made it clear that the Parker-Bowleses were angry about the "Harkle" version of events, especially the attacks on Camilla. And since no one made them sign an NDA... 🤣🤣🤣

But in reality, it's not like you need many sources on this. As Sean is telling it, just look at the past a little. To the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.

King George VI initially sympathized with his older brother and had half-promised that Wallis Simpson would be granted the title of Her Royal Highness (HRH) Queen Mary (Mary Teck. mother of George and Edward), and Queen Elizabeth (later the Queen Mother) vehemently opposed Wallis, viewing the abdication as a supreme dereliction of duty.

Under intense pressure from Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth, George VI issued Letters Patent that successfully denied Wallis Simpson the HRH title, deeply outraging the Duke of Windsor.

https://preview.redd.it/vh9wp0m3bsoh1.png?width=2560&format=png&auto=webp&s=1192963fd238b22798cb675da150cba3d5040bb4

George VI’s motivation was the same as Charles’s is now: to protect not only the monarchy but also his loved ones. For George VI, his wife Elizabeth was central to his life; if Wallis was a problem, Wallis would cease to be a problem. For Charles, that person is Kate. Charles adores his daughter-in-law, and he is not going to put Claw on the same level as Kate. Not even remotely.

That isn't how Harry sees things. Harry didn't realize that his plan had failed on that day, July 10th. Because yes, the King had agreed to see him, but Harry brought the children along. And Sean has already recounted the details: KC3 didn't spend much time with the children, because he spoke with Harry in private first... Harry, KC3 and Camilla.

https://preview.redd.it/5opszp9fcsoh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=8f5a33603d089169efb6c9df2b0403803ad4785b

Charles spent very little time with the invisible children, and far less with Claw.

At that meeting, as Sean has already recounted, Harry sounded Charles out by telling him he had no problem "collaborating" with the Firm. Sean has already said that Charles heard what Harry had to say but didn't respond to it. What he *did* do was ask about their plans regarding Thomas Markle. And Sean has recounted that when the Harkles told him they had none—that they weren't going to see him—Charles was not at all pleased. Sean makes it clear that the gossip comes from a very reliable source. Charles couldn't believe that Harry—the son he had raised—could be so cold and calculating.

Charles must have looked at him like this.

https://preview.redd.it/bvquh8mkdsoh1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=e13396850bcf7d310cf0f0be9f9d37c50db414b1

So, Charles was well aware when the Harkles announced their move that things were definitely going wrong. And yes, the matter had been under discussion since April, according to Sean's sources. Sean had already stated that the Australian tour was intended to show the BRF that the Harkles could handle that kind of work. No, they can't do it.

Claw resisted as much as she could because she doesn't want to be in the UK. She wants the photo—the photo is enough for her; she doesn't care about the true narrative—she just wants a photo and to invent stories about it. But wanting to be on the balcony? No—not after the last time when, if you watch the video, Andrew and Anne relegated the Harkles to the corner. Claw doesn't want that.

So, what do the Harkles want? We know that even they don't know. But the fact is, they needed at least an invitation to Balmoral. According to Sean, Harry even called the Palace to get that invitation. It didn't happen.

Nor did it happen that William showed up at Highgrove. Indeed, Sean reaffirms that Harry was convinced William would appear at Highgrove to meet the "invisible ones."

Harry thought William would come with his children to meet their cousins—that it would be a family reunion. Harry cannot believe that William does not want to meet the Sussex children. Harry cannot accept that William still refuses to pick up the photos of the Sussex children that Harry left for him.

So, Harry views William as a major thorn in his side. Harry cannot accept the fact that, now that he is in the UK, there still hasn't been a family meeting where he can state what he wants to do within the British Royal Family.

https://preview.redd.it/docbzkayfsoh1.jpg?width=512&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fbb3bd922af78d62c7d50169457b50b6ff39da0e

Sean says Harry has stated that this move is part of a 15-year plan. Inside the Palace, the view is that it will last 15 minutes. 🤣🤣🤣

Especially because Claw is furious about what is happening. She sees that things are turning out worse than she expected, but if she leaves for the U.S. just as the children are starting school, how will that affect her image?

Sean says let's not kid ourselves: this really is a family at war. But it has all been caused by the Harkles.

SUSSEX CRUSHING BLOW HAPPENED AFTER THIS BOMBSHELL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mQ_Pho2kmU

Sean is right about this: Harry has spent so much time in therapy that he no longer knows his own mind.

Going to therapy hasn't done Harry any good. And that’s because Harry only listens to what he wants to hear.

And as further proof, consider this: a box as big as Noah's Ark.

Harry was absolutely convinced that the Australian tour would be a success and that they would win back their large fan base there.

Sean puts it this way: a fan base that the Harkles ignored for years.

Harry believed that his mere presence there would be enough for people to rally around him. That didn't happen. And it didn't happen because the vast majority of Australians seemed to clearly see that the Harkles are not royals, but rather two private citizens. After all, wasn't that trip—a private one—undertaken in that capacity?

https://preview.redd.it/bkhv3ocfisoh1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=62fffed61a3aad6d76b37f780c52094533660a57

The major setback for Harry in Australia is that the local Invictus organization decided to cut ties with him. Harry failed to grasp the gravity of the situation, just as he fails to see the reality of the situation with the Invictus committee in Birmingham. He does not even truly appreciate the seriousness of what happened regarding Uganda and Invictus.

Because—and Sean is stating this with great confidence, so it seems he has a reliable source, and by "reliable source" I mean not just at the Palace but inside Downing Street—the statement issued by Uganda regarding its decision not to participate in the Invictus Games is linked to King Charles III’s decision to have absolutely no involvement—zero—with Invictus unless there are radical changes within the organization.

Now, Sean points out that the controversies over whether the King would participate or not—and all that rubbish in the articles—were precisely a red flag for Uganda. It is not in the interest of the Ugandan government (a dictatorship) to get dragged into such a controversy; if they have to take a side, it is better to play it safe. If the King isn't appearing at Invictus, why be part of the Harkles' circus?

And part of those changes is that Claw has no business being there.

Invictus was created by William, and the Royal Foundation—supported by Kate, Charles, and the Queen—was established to give Harry something to do. There is no place there for Claw; she played no role in its creation, nor has she had any involvement in it.

Sean says the King might still send a video... no, it’s not that Sean is contradicting himself. The point is that Sean notes there is real work being done with veterans at Invictus; he’s annoyed that Harry is ruining it all, but the veterans aren't to blame for that. So, KC3 could take those people into consideration. But that’s Sean’s opinion. The rumor he heard is that there is zero chance—not a single royal will set foot in Birmingham in July 2027.

And it’s all the Harkles' fault. It is not wise to be linked to the Harkles.

SECURITY, DIVA & A KITCHEN DRAMA REEMERGES..LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0hA9DxirTw

Claw doesn't care about *Invictus*. Claw doesn't care how the situation affects Harry—or doesn't.

What really irks Claw is that things coming out of Australia keep getting worse.

What was Claw aiming for by going on MasterChef?

https://preview.redd.it/rif0nrxinsoh1.png?width=755&format=png&auto=webp&s=d4bb916210e3c5b2428ca6b8e7c6850fc9cff239

....

....

....

Oh, I get it now!

Sean mentioned that the call seemed like a security threat. I didn't quite understand it at the time, but now I do. The thing is, the MasterChef judges didn't know about the call, though the production team did; they wanted Harry to appear and taste some dishes. But Harry didn't want to go because he was trying to redefine his image. So, they agreed that Harry would call, but he wasn't calling because he didn't want to. Consequently, when this staff member brought the phone to Claw, the judges thought Claw was receiving a security alert.

That is what Sofia Levin, one of the MasterChef judges, said.

https://preview.redd.it/37sfyioipsoh1.png?width=387&format=png&auto=webp&s=62ff0df8a6d8d9d2ddce89eac33ee18307fa394e

What Sean criticizes is that when Harry made that call, Claw should have highlighted what Harry was doing and asked veterans to salute. But no: everything always has to revolve around Claw.

So they played along with Claw on that show, without realizing that Claw was talking about her and that everything revolved around her... back when Harry was with veterans.

That is precisely what Invictus Australia saw. And it is something that Invictus Uganda saw.

https://preview.redd.it/xa03r54dqsoh1.png?width=717&format=png&auto=webp&s=9d601b5b549bb6997426ff0bbb55384e2f489f86

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 1 month ago

‘Manners make the man. Manners, manners, manners, manners, manners.’ (Meghan Markle)

Do you remember it? That phrase she said to Archie...

Meghan, my dear, you’re going to have to take your own advice.

Following the Lord Chamberlain's statement, the Harkles are private citizens.

Yes, but they hold noble titles... ah, but that makes them aristocrats. The main difference between a royal (royalty) and an aristocrat (nobility) lies in sovereignty and proximity to the throne. While royals belong to the family that holds the position of Head of State by right of direct succession, aristocrats are individuals who hold titles granted by the Crown but possess no dynastic rights. To put it simply, the relationship between the two is hierarchical: all high-ranking royals hold aristocratic titles, yet the vast majority of aristocrats are not royals.

Upon losing their status as active royals and having their "His/Her Royal Highness" (HRH) styles placed in abeyance, official protocol dictates that they are no longer entitled to the traditional courtesies—such as bowing, formal titles, and institutional precedence—accorded to a working royal. Although royal protocol is optional for the general public in the United Kingdom, the distinctions are very pronounced within formal settings.

I mean:

Traditional Courtesy With a Working Royal With Harry and Meghan (As "private citizens")
The Bow / Curtsy Men: A nod of the head (from the neck).Women: A small curtsy bending the knees. Not applicable. Officials and citizens no longer have to bow or curtsy to them. They are greeted with a standard handshake.
Formal Spoken Address Upon introduction, they are addressed as "Your Royal Highness" and subsequently as "Sir" or "Ma'am". Not used. The palace has prohibited the use of "Your Royal Highness". They are addressed formally by their nominal titles (Duke/Duchess) or simply as "Harry and Meghan".
Precedence at Events They enter and are seated according to their rank in the line of succession to the throne. Lower-ranking members walk behind or stand waiting for the arrival of the most senior royals. They lose priority. Since they attend strictly in a personal capacity, they do not participate in official royal processions and are placed in seats designated for civilian guests or extended family.
Official Correspondence Official letters addressed to them use monarchical formulas of courtesy regulated by the Greeting a Member of The Royal Family guidelines. Aristocrats may use their family coat of arms on their private stationery or properties. However, they may not use official royal crowns or monograms that suggest they represent the government or the British Head of State. Standard civilian procedure. All correspondence is handled outside of Royal Household channels and is sent directly to their private commercial office. Limited Use of Official Insignia

Under strict royal protocol, members who do not hold the style of HRH must bow or curtsy to those who do (such as King Charles, Queen Camilla, or the Prince and Princess of Wales). As they are classified as private citizens, Harry and Meghan rank below any working member of the Crown at formal state events.

In other words, it’s not optional for TW: Harry now has to bow to Kate, because she is HRH. Harry isn't. And TW, if she runs into Kate, has to curtsy.

How can you find this out? There are two ways:

1. The Royal Family’s official website (Guide section). The only direct, public, written reference managed by the palace is found in the information section of the British Royal Family’s official website (Royal.uk). It formally outlines standard protocol under the heading "Greeting a Member of The Royal Family," briefly explaining how to perform a nod or a bow/curtsey and how to use titles (Your Royal Highness, Sir, or Ma'am).

https://www.royal.uk/encyclopedia/greeting-a-member-of-the-royal-family

2. Traditional Guides to the Nobility (Debrett's) For everything the Palace does not publicly disclose, the British aristocracy and institutions turn to the historic guide to etiquette known as Debrett's (*Peerage & Baronetage*). For centuries, this private organization has formally recorded the forms of address for the nobility, the exact order of precedence, and the nuances of British court etiquette, serving as the unofficial reference manual for diplomats and event planners.

https://debretts.com/royal-family/addressing-the-royal-family/

Outside the United Kingdom, protocol becomes much more complex because foreign governments are not legally bound to follow the directives of King Charles III's office, although they generally choose to respect them out of diplomatic courtesy.

1. Diplomatic Status and "Quasi-Official Visits":

As Harkles are considered "private citizens" by the British Crown, their charitable or commercial trips do not constitute official State visits. This means that: There is no representation from the United Kingdom; local British embassies do not organize their itineraries, host official receptions in their honor, or act as liaisons with host-country authorities.

If a foreign government (as occurred during their visits to Nigeria or Colombia) chooses to welcome them with red-carpet honors or state-provided security, it does so entirely on its own initiative. The host country bears the financial cost and decides—based on its own protocols—whether to treat them as international dignitaries or as high-profile celebrities.

2. Written forms of address and invitations outside the Commonwealth.

In the international and diplomatic spheres outside the Commonwealth, the nuances of British aristocracy are often simplified: foreign organizers and heads of state typically address them—both verbally and in writing—using only their formal titles: Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.

As they are not subject to the direct jurisdiction of London-based palace protocols, it is common at foundation events or international galas in places like the United States for presenters—whether by custom or at the decision of the Sussexes' own team—to continue omitting the "private citizen" label and instead focus on their image as global public figures.

3. Bowing abroad.

International protocol dictates that no citizen of a republic (such as the United States, France, or most Latin American countries) is obliged to bow to a member of foreign nobility or royalty. Given that Harry and Meghan operate internationally in a personal and private capacity, the standard global greeting is strictly a handshake or the conventional social greeting of the country they are visiting.

When a noble decides to bypass protocol and forgo the mandatory bow or curtsy to the King or a high-ranking royal, no legal offense is committed, nor is there any criminal penalty. The last British law allowing for physical punishment or imprisonment for showing disrespect to the monarch at court became obsolete centuries ago. However, in practice—and within the exclusive circles of British high society and politics—the consequences are strictly social, institutional, and reputational:

1. Social "Freezing Out" (The Cold Shoulder). The most immediate consequence is isolation within the court. The noble who commits the slight stops receiving invitations to key events such as: diplomatic receptions and state dinners; exclusive Buckingham Palace garden parties; and semi-official events of the aristocratic social season (such as the races at Ascot).

2. Loss of Royal Favor and Patronage. Nobles often compete for the monarch's favor to secure honorary appointments or to gain royal support for their charitable foundations. A snub of this nature ensures that the palace revokes or denies any royal patronage, directly damaging the prestige and influence of that noble's family.

3. The Lord Chamberlain’s Filter: The Lord Chamberlain’s Office is responsible for organizing the court’s schedule. If an aristocrat deliberately breaches protocol, the office simply strikes them from the preferred seating lists for future State events (such as royal weddings, funerals, or the State Opening of Parliament), relegating them to the background or excluding them entirely.

4. Press Scandal: In the United Kingdom, tabloids and royal experts scrutinize every interaction using high-definition cameras. A failure to bow immediately becomes a national headline, labeling the noble as "rude," "rebellious," or "anti-British," which places immense public pressure on their family and business interests.

thecut.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 1 month ago

Forewarned is forearmed (Neil Sean's gossips)

FUMING BEHIND THE SCENES - THIS IS WHAT STARTED IT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwW7aElkZd8

Sean has made it clear that there is a more significant picture that led KC3 to put a stop to the Harkles.

It is not just the fact that the working members—such as the Gloucesters, Anne, William himself, and Sophie—all deserve respect; something the Harkles have failed to show them.

This has a lot to do with what happened in Canada, Australia, Nigeria, and Ukraine.

Sean touches on the issue of security. In all those places where the Harkles have gone on what the press calls "pseudo-royal" tours, they were provided with a certain level of security.

Amidst all this, Australia was the final straw.

For one thing, the tour wasn't even well-organized, but the truly distasteful part was that the whole thing was a tawdry cosplay of royalty. Sean points to the infamous visit to the Royal Children's Hospital.

https://preview.redd.it/quq4cno5rdoh1.png?width=387&format=png&auto=webp&s=2232228528d22299cc6ee679bf9a4fbf89b15440

Dan Wootton said about that, what Meghan allegedly said before entering the hospital. “Let’s make this quick,” a source at the hospital quoted her as saying. Once the couple entered the foyer, “the acting started,” said Wootton.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDcUy1Mjvm0

Neil Sean is now saying, "Yes, that happened." Because, what's more, it seems that Claw—who loves the cameras—never pays attention to what those cameras are recording.

Sean puts it more bluntly: Claw is interested in the attention, but when she gets bored, she starts hitting Harry on the back to leave—because that’s it, enough is enough; they’ve already got the photo.

Claw doesn't realize that everything he's doing is being recorded, and there's no mistaking that.

Harry was focused on securing Australia as the host for the next Invictus Games. Sean had already mentioned on several occasions that the organization's Australian branch was upset with Harry because the Australian government had threatened to withdraw funding from the foundation. The Australian government ultimately did so. They later reversed the decision, but only because the Australian organization took action to make it happen; they received no help from Harry. He believed everything would be resolved simply by his divine presence.

Well, it seems his divine presence was not only useless but also a major reason why Invictus lost those funds.

Sean also recalls that Claw arrived late to Invictus Canada because he was "looking after his kids" and left early because he had to go "look after his kids."

Now, let’s also remember that the Invictus committee in Birmingham told Harry—to his face—that they wanted "real royals." This has been reported not only by Sean but also by Rebecca English, Richard Eden, Dan Wootton, and others.

So, the Harkles are supposedly in the Cotswolds (Sean said they’re actually in Northamptonshire, but we’re supposed to believe they’re in the Cotswolds) while being funded or supported by a millionaire "friend." I think Sean was asking yesterday, "Where is my millionaire friend?" because he’s never had friends that generous... or are they not actually generous? No, Sean makes it clear that such a thing doesn't exist. That "friend" is going to cash in on this "help."

https://preview.redd.it/fih8h7e7vdoh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=ac2338a7cbbb830bf8e1acd0c96ec3bb1aa3b2a3

Nothing comes from nothing. This is the deal. It’s really a world of murky money. Somebody wants something somewhere

Sean has said that the path the Harkles are on is not only sketchy but has already been traversed by two other people.

https://preview.redd.it/4p5x9x51wdoh1.png?width=250&format=png&auto=webp&s=92936c6c90d2cd98ddf47a69aff643d2518a6422

Sean has said the difference is that Edward was Edward VIII—a king—and a king who abdicated. That always carries a certain sensational appeal. Harry is nothing like that. And Wallis had great class and style; Claw doesn't.

When you don't have money, you can gain access to certain areas in exchange for certain things. That is what happened with this interview for *Life* magazine, which was very well paid.

https://preview.redd.it/4r0mbahmwdoh1.png?width=480&format=png&auto=webp&s=06faf3bfbbe0aa6823272e8d5f57e08335ef6697

That said, it’s not that the Harkles lack money; the matter seems to be more complicated than that.

Sean already said yesterday that the Lord Chamberlain's letter was specifically intended to make it clear that if they want to pay the Harkles, it must be understood that the payment is to them personally, and they should not expect anything from the Royal Family.

But there is an underlying issue here, too. Because Sean is right: if a celebrity aligns themselves with a particular organization, it is to gain visibility, because they have an agenda, or to boost their own image. Pure altruism is rare. And those organizations pay for that. The BRF wants to avoid getting dragged into those controversies.

With this, King Charles III wanted to make it clear where his focus lies: protecting William and Kate from controversies like those stirred up by the Harkles—scandals very similar to the ones caused by Andrew that have created conflict for the British Royal Family. Charles is making it clear right now that Harry’s mess is Harry’s mess, and that the Royal Family has nothing to do with it.

Especially since not only is the Sentebale matter likely to surface this month, but so is the situation regarding Archewell.

And making it clear to the Labour government that if they provide security for the Harkles, that is Labour's problem. Don't drag the Royal Family into it.

That has gone down terribly in the Sussex camp. Because Harry believed—oh, God!—but yes, it seems Harry believed, and Claw did too, that the King was now on their side and shared the Harkles' point of view.

https://preview.redd.it/720n2pi73eoh1.png?width=667&format=png&auto=webp&s=16ca668b31ba6fd0ab3f26f9aafa4c43309f7219

Where did they get that idea? I don't know, but they believe it. Or they used to believe it.

Now that KC3 has made the Harkles' status clear—demoting them not just from their royal standing, but from VIPs to mere, common peasants—what does Claw plan to do? After all, Harry remains Charles's son; that bond hasn't been severed. Yet, the chances of the Harkles appearing on the balcony again have once more dropped to virtually nil.

MARRIAGE TEXTS TEARS & THIS REFUSAL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s87yuWMKriU

I agree with Sean here: Is Meghan Markle an empowered woman?

https://preview.redd.it/9gp99ynz4eoh1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=eb5a8cfd7c5a13cbc1ff0d78977049f19d7e705c

When you see her constantly glued to Harry—with her claws always on him—and constantly crying (there is an entire chapter in *Spare* about her crying), what emerges is a manipulative woman, not an empowered one.

She tries to play a strong woman... but she does a terrible job of it.

It’s simple: she is incapable of facing anything. When things get tough, she simply ignores them and runs away. We’ve never seen Claw face anything. She doesn’t even tolerate comments on her Instagram. She always pushes Harry to defend her.

When she has a problem, Harry always has to be there. When Harry has problems, Claw is never around.

https://preview.redd.it/vclmvh4z6eoh1.png?width=387&format=png&auto=webp&s=9aeb68e0d35c9f17cf16ce76e7b55de02c20f7ff

And that is exactly what happened yesterday. Harry took this photo before the Palace sent out that statement. So, Harry didn't know that yesterday he had gone from being a royal and a public figure to a private citizen.

I'm sorry, but that brings out my worst side—pure schadenfreude 🤣🤣

https://preview.redd.it/3t8de1ma7eoh1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=f49a4400824917a48e6493b1e145f8c550248cd6

Harry was in that studio. What was he doing there? Recording something. Sean doesn't know yet. But then, Harry wrote his name on the whiteboard. And Sean says that was it. That it was a really disappointing visit.

Doing what some celebrities do, not what a true royal does.

But the thing is, Harry appeared alone for that visit. He should have gone with Claw. Yes, it was supposed to be a joint appearance because—you know—George was starting at Eton that day, so they had to steal the spotlight.

But Harry showed up alone. Why? He never explained. What the source *did* tell Sean was that Harry’s phone kept receiving text messages. They didn't know what the messages were about, but Harry’s expression would change every time he looked at them. It seems Harry wasn't the first to see the message from the Lord Chamberlain—Claw saw it first, and Harry found out about it while he was on that visit.

Sean says Harry wasn't exactly happy about making that visit alone, but while there, they found out he was taking care of some paperwork. Sean doesn't know anything beyond that.

What Sean *does* suspect is that Claw will stay in the UK at least until October—until the "invisible children's" first break. After that, they’ll head to California or wherever else. Because by then, I imagine Claw will have had a few hundred hysterical fits.

But what they thought they had yesterday, they no longer have: a genuine association with the BRF. No, that is gone, meaning that working with them now lacks the very thing that made them attractive. Consequently, there is no great scramble to work with them.

Claw feels that the agenda Harry sold him is very different from the agenda they actually have now.

So now Claw is set on not living in the UK. She thinks they could move to Australia, because they were treated very warmly there.

https://preview.redd.it/20w2kyo6beoh1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=29b01b7e77a4d50bd9a4855431451079b8db5ce9

Claw sees that nothing is going according to plan. The King's official missive has left her bewildered, and she simply does not want to show her face in public.

Not only is it not a match made in heaven, but she is also a coward.

MARKLE'S "SURPRISE" FOR GEORGE & BUCKINGHAM PALACE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nm5eJdEG1Jg

That said, did the Palace expect such a dirty trick? Yes, they did. William knew that Harry and Claw would do anything to ruin George’s first day at Eton.

https://preview.redd.it/fyzdyjlndeoh1.png?width=480&format=png&auto=webp&s=47ec0741b8bb4013abaa7a90921e724151847b28

https://preview.redd.it/wqpx2f9udeoh1.png?width=399&format=png&auto=webp&s=9f894d5e47613a59268c1c00540196f1d7166a3e

For Harry, in particular, it was something he personally wanted to spoil for George.

Because 1) George got into Eton the proper way—meaning he apparently had no trouble with his grades, and his grandfather the King didn't have to pull any strings, unlike what his grandmother the Queen had to do for Harry—and 2) because George is the one who displaced Harry from the great honor of being the "spare." William no longer needs a spare; he has his own son.

So, the Lord Chamberlain's letter yesterday wasn't sent by chance. We all know that. That was the poisonous malice that keeps the British monarchy alive. Did the Harkles want front-page headlines? Yesterday, they got them.

https://preview.redd.it/fmf6vkv1ceoh1.png?width=798&format=png&auto=webp&s=e7e0929b823f9421abf3a382f57da742b06a5e2e

But Claw and Harry don't learn their lesson.

Because while George was entering Eton and officially becoming a teenager, the Harkles were telling the press that they were surprised by the King's letter.

In other words, they’re being told they are private citizens and that the risk of losing their titles is real, yet Claw is hell-bent on keeping the spotlight on herself—and on Harry, too.

The Harkles couldn't wait to issue statements through their spokesperson expressing surprise and claiming they would have liked to discuss the King's letter beforehand. They had to do it just as George was starting at Eton. This is precisely the kind of attitude that has led the King to publicly declare—and this is the interesting part—to the UK and the Commonwealth that the Harkles are not royals.

I don't think George minds much about not making the front pages. The poor boy was quite flushed when he greeted the headmaster of Eton yesterday, but he looked like a happy boy heading to the same school his father attended. They were even dressed alike to emphasize that—that George was following in William's footsteps—with the difference being that George has parents who love each other.

But the Harkles definitely wanted to ruin George's day—and yesterday, even more so; they wanted revenge. The Harkles have neither compassion nor empathy.

I have no doubt that George will do infinitely better at Eton than Harry did... and better than Julio did at school 🤣🤣

https://preview.redd.it/si0albhbgeoh1.png?width=320&format=png&auto=webp&s=deeb038c7ef3f7f26aa93827f73b0a2376868269

But what a great honor for Eton to have on its roll of honor not only William or Leopold III of Belgium, but also George—one of the very few potential heirs to have played a prominent role in the coronation of one of his predecessors.

https://preview.redd.it/9uttybbugeoh1.png?width=768&format=png&auto=webp&s=f09af94284d73b7ca424cdf49b06e0541846ae2c

I don't know if you realize it, but George is already in the history books. And not like his uncle—the one who ended up in the third row, hidden behind the huge feather on Princess Anne's hat. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

https://preview.redd.it/6s27uqolheoh1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=c1389dfc59f4b9183855d34b536f8d50b5673941

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 1 month ago

The couple said they were denied the chance to clarify several points in his unprecedented announcement which described them as ‘private citizens’, not working royals. (Daily Mail)

From the whole Daily Mail article that a sinner already posted here (Team Sussex hit back again in royal letter row as they claim they did not have enough time to 'clarify' points before Palace released it to public https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16113973/Kings-royal-letter-row-intensifies-Team-Sussex-say-did-not-time-clarify-points-released-public.html ) that phrase I don't understand.

What is it that they need to clarify? There is nothing to clarify. They aren't royals. There is no need to pay them homage just because they hold a noble title; they are private citizens. What is there to clarify?

The decision was made by the King. It is not open to consultation; Harry seems not to grasp his position: he is subject to the King's will. If the King does not want him as a working royal and does not intend to accord him royal status, his duty as a duke is to bow his head and acquiesce. Not to argue. He is in no position to argue.

For Harry’s team to claim that the letter was released just as RAVEC was about to review his security arrangements makes it sound as though Harry was leveraging his status as the King’s son to sway not only a RAVEC decision but a ruling by the British courts. He is not a working royal; in reality, he is no longer a royal at all. He is a private citizen, and his security is his own responsibility. That is something he was told not only back in 2020 but also by four judges between 2024 and 2025.

I am truly struck by the level of brazenness—but above all, the level of stupidity—shown by Harry. I’m not surprised by TW; she has proven herself to be a deeply ignorant person. But Harry ought to know better, because it was explained to him—and this isn't gossip, it’s a fact; it was explained to him step by step, multiple times. What is wrong with that man?

I could understand it if he were, I don’t know, Charles’s unacknowledged son demanding his right to be recognized. That would make sense. But Harry is demanding the privileges of a job he walked away from.

And now, instead of understanding the message—which is very clear (obey)—what does he do? He complains! Unbelievable.

https://preview.redd.it/7e9qf8jyiboh1.png?width=1002&format=png&auto=webp&s=c23daf74e510b06053dcb49d3a87dd98c5c7629e

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 1 month ago

For every mystery, someone somewhere knows the answer. Perhaps that person is watching tonight, perhaps it is you. (Robert Stack, Neil Sean's gossips)

https://preview.redd.it/gdszrzau5enh1.png?width=3840&format=png&auto=webp&s=847fbfef3ed69ec8866f6cdd8fe1ff8b82ad1143

A lot of stuff about the Harkles ought to show up in a new version of this show 🤣🤣

NOT QUITE LIVING IN THE UK AT ALL RIGHT MARKLE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFIrwvmAlzQ

Let’s start with something many of us—Sean included—were wondering: did Harry really manage to convince Claw to move back to the UK? Sean didn't think it was possible, and several people here criticized him for lacking reliable sources, given that he had spent weeks saying Claw flatly refused to even travel to the UK again. And then, all of a sudden, she had agreed to move.

Well, no, Claw didn't agree to move.

The matter is more... complex? No, it’s actually absurd.

Sean already stated his position on the visa issue in a video yesterday; he suggests that the trouble Harry is in isn't about the visa, but rather about money. The Harkles' business dealings are very opaque. And I agree with that point of view. What is happening has more to do with the Harkles' wallet than with the visa.

But the thing is, Harry returned to the UK... Well, actually, it turns out he hasn't really returned to the UK.

The fact is, Claw has absolutely no intention of leaving California. She doesn't want to live in the UK because she knows there's no way her image will improve. She’s waiting to see if anything changes, but she won't do anything about it herself. So, Harry and Claw are looking at an arrangement where he spends the week in the UK—or rather, he stays in the UK, but not in the Cotswolds; instead, he'd be somewhere in the surrounding area (it seems Harry finally realized he's loathed in the Cotswolds 🤣🤣🤣)—and then spends the weekend outside the UK.

No, Sean isn't making it up; it's a piece of gossip someone on the staff told him. That doesn't mean it's actually going to happen, though. But that person told him they would be spending their weekends in Portugal.

The word is that they could have a quieter life in Portugal.

https://preview.redd.it/6w2so7xs8enh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=cd7c517197175973f5c7cf821d578ecf44eff34d

I’d really like to know what to think, but I can’t. Because Sean is right: according to the gossip he heard, nobody in Portugal actually knows where they are... even though Claw always leaves a trail. She does it because she loves having people look for her and find her. But the thing is, they’re pretending to be in Portugal to keep up the lifestyle they had in California—you know, the beach, the sun, that sort of thing.

https://preview.redd.it/94m5xnn59enh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=f0be1011db1b35d9d964ec6607fcd4c9e1787a5f

According to Sean's source, that is how Harry persuaded Claw to go along with all of this.

That said, Sean claims the real issue is that Harry wants time for himself. He is hoping for lucrative opportunities to open up in the UK—because California is a no-go now. Especially given what Trump has said; and incidentally, it’s not just Trump’s opinion—it seems this is one of those rare instances where Hollywood liberals and Trump actually agree: the Harkles are toxic.

Harry believes he will receive offers in the UK, and he lets Claw continue with her "As Ever" venture so she has something to occupy her time—since he has nothing going on. Meanwhile, Harry is trying to rebuild his image and regain his popularity.

Claw does not want to leave California or the US; nothing else matters to her. Consequently, she has no intention of leaving California except on weekends—when the children are home—since they are in school during the week. So, Claw and Harry will spend their weekends in Portugal, far from the UK, during a period that—according to this source—Claw views as a very difficult six to nine months for her sanity.

https://preview.redd.it/jmyi2lrfaenh1.png?width=300&format=png&auto=webp&s=6b4115b7681e5e4f3fbc48d55cfad2ce7f1ae004

Are she trying to play the "I can't take it anymore, I can't go on, I'm going to commit sui***" card again???????????????? 😲😲😲😲😲😲😲

Before anyone criticizes Sean: he’s just sharing some gossip he heard from Montecito. And he’s sharing it because he doesn’t understand at what exact moment Claw went from "I hate the UK" to "Sure, H—I’ll live in the middle of a rainy swamp if you ask me to."

Regarding the matter of Harry having to leave the UK, Sean is already convinced it was all about the money. But the situation with Claw is very strange—especially considering she’s already making all sorts of excuses: security, Kate, the rain, the sun... The story Sean told is wild, but Claw is certainly capable of getting Harry to agree to something like that, leaving him to deal with the problems back in the UK all on his own once again.

In other words, it seems the situation remains that Claw will only live in the UK again once she is crowned Queen of England.

https://preview.redd.it/rn70wqlacenh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=f6e49cb466cba632fc937402ae79e32b352d1976

The British would become a communist republic before putting up with that 🤣🤣🤣🤣

MARKLE SECRET UK FILMING - THIS IS THE PLAN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HG0Aza7jBk

Sean hasn't felt any schadenfreude over Claw's failure and the poor promotion for *As Ever*. What Sean always criticizes is that Claw had excellent advisors and the backing of Netflix, yet she wouldn't listen to anyone but herself. Failure was inevitable for that reason: because Claw refused to accept that making videos and the like isn't easy. Sean has said it many times: he has been learning as he goes, and even he still makes mistakes.

So, Sean isn't mocking the failure itself, but rather the poor—and repeatedly poor—execution. Because, even though there is a certain professional touch to the soft look and the lighting, there’s Claw with dead flowers in a vase... what does that mean? What does she sell?

Well, Claw supposedly wants to have his own screening room, and apparently, they’d be filming in London.

Right, Sean has connections in that world, so he knows the company that was contacted to set up a recording studio at a property. Mind you, this isn't just for Claw; it would be for Harry, too. He makes a lot of videos.

https://preview.redd.it/75giwif9fenh1.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=064e0e115b11265b0ab1d72fe5ebc2d421a79ac1

Sean says Harry wants to improve the quality of the videos he’ll be making to get his message across—he wants them to look better, rather than looking like they were "filmed in some hostage zone in the Middle East or something like that"... that’s what Sean said 😂😂😂

And it seems the Harkles intend to do one-on-one interviews—something like... not podcasts, but... videocasts? I don't know, but something along those lines.

On top of that, there would be green screens involved, so Sean believes the Harkles will produce that documentary about Diana on their own. Harry seems dead set on it now.

For Claw, however, there is a problem she hadn't considered. She thought the hard part was staying in someone else's mansion. It wasn't. The hard part is that the area—near the Cotswolds—has a zero-tolerance policy for paparazzi and drones.

So, Claw realizes she won't be able to go to parking lots for those outings. She figures that if she has to spend a few days in the UK, she’ll focus on making cooking videos—though she wouldn't actually be cooking; she’d just be offering tips.

The idea is to create content to secure sponsorships and perks—capitalizing on any worthwhile speeches Harry might give, and producing videos Claw could potentially sell to Paramount or Hulu. But Sean doesn't expect anything worthwhile to come out of it. 😂😂

NO WAY OUT FOR MARKLES & THIS DISASTER

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BC1DCNkOX44

If Claw thinks that making videos and pitching them to Netflix will make her the Queen of the place again, it seems she didn't understand that she was kicked out and isn't wanted there.

So much so that when Town & Country asked Theo James—the star (yes, he really is the star, unlike Claw in *Suits*) of The Gentlemen—about the possibility of a former royal joining the series, he said, "Yes, 'Fergie' is joining. She’ll play my love interest." Immediately after the joke, he was far more direct regarding Claw appearing in the show: "I don't think that will happen; it was mostly just a lot of empty talk," he stated.

https://preview.redd.it/pu8gn7opienh1.png?width=780&format=png&auto=webp&s=1fee648677c5542d7771eda4c8710833f8be3705

I mean, Guy Ritchie capitalized on the buzz to get people interested in the series... but actually hiring that terrible, bottom-rate actress who plays Claw? No.

Sean knows firsthand just how ugly things can get in the television world. He wrote a radio play and submitted it to a company, which in turn presented it to BBC Radio; the BBC gave a blunt response—"We like it, but we don't like *him*"—referring to Sean. And all because Sean—if you watch his channel—dedicates at least one video a day to criticizing the BBC.

The first-look deals the Harkles supposedly have with Netflix are really just a way to source ideas, not to buy the finished product. In any case, Sean gets the impression that "Claw" doesn't even have an idea in mind right now 😈😈

Sean has already said that the Harkles have a knack for attracting publicity. Not for their own benefit, but for others'.

That’s why Netflix still has a connection to the Harkles—because they might still need them as "executive producers," purely for the sake of publicity. The latest news on the matter was that the Harkles are developing a film adaptation of the war memoir *No Way Out* for Netflix through their production company, Archewell Productions.

But that door is closing, too. Because the Harkles simply have a knack for generating negativity; they provoke a strong backlash among so many people. It’s funny when you think about it: the Harkles are the only ones who manage to get Republicans and Democrats, Argentines and Brazilians, atheists and Catholics, and republicans and monarchists to agree on one thing—that they are toxic.

So, there is no interest in pursuing what the Harkles are aiming to do. And that became clear with the Cookie Queens situation.

And also because Netflix doesn't want Zoom meetings. And Harry seems too arrogant to realize that he should have fought harder and worked harder.

MARKLE, THE EMAIL & THIS LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyFkI3o23nA

Sean says it has been a long time since he attended a glamorous premiere. In fact, at the most recent ones he has covered, he didn't recognize the cast members of the series or movies—something that has happened to other reporters as well. Consequently, it has become standard practice to hand out a list of potential interviewees so reporters know that some of them are reality TV stars.

The premiere of *The Gentlemen* took place in London.

https://preview.redd.it/r5hj1dqcsenh1.png?width=387&format=png&auto=webp&s=6bc1cf34a192fa4615148510ceff66467c1d2983

Sean knows Guy Ritchie, so he was one of the few people who thought to ask Ritchie’s office whether or not there was any truth to the idea of ​​having Claw on the show.

As it turns out, a few weeks ago, Ritchie’s production office received a call and an email regarding the possibility of featuring Claw on the series. They treated it as a joke because the email didn't come from an affiliated agency or WME; no one took it seriously. However, someone in the office realized it was a good way to generate publicity. Sean had already mentioned that Ritchie had no idea about the matter but was capitalizing on the situation.

Sean clarifies that this doesn't mean they wouldn't call Claw in the future—purely for the sake of publicity.

That said, what Theo James said—after years of merely serving as a handsome prop in series and movies, he is finally getting the chance to show he can actually act—made headlines around the world. So, you can guess what’s happening with Claw.

https://preview.redd.it/4z5eujmcuenh1.png?width=660&format=png&auto=webp&s=364c6e901929bea5ba546b0920d1327d10d6e1c9

Claw is crying because the people involved in the series simply aren't interested in her at all. And Claw's team is furious that people were so insincere at the premiere, claiming they didn't know where that story came from, when in fact Ritchie's office had done the most to spread the rumor.

That is why Claw is angry—because the narrative spiraled out of her control. And she hates that: losing control. Claw feels used, especially by Netflix.

Right, because she isn't using Gloria Steinem's death to her own advantage at all 😏😏😏. But nothing goes the way Claw wants; even though she was initially happy to be mentioned in *Deadline* and *The Hollywood Reporter* amidst the *The Gentlemen* buzz, the fact is that it was Ritchie and his series that truly benefited—even securing a third season and a massive surge in viewership. The only thing Claw actually got out of it was being called an "actress."

Since she isn't one, she should see it as an achievement 🤣🤣🤭

https://preview.redd.it/122u21xfvenh1.png?width=406&format=png&auto=webp&s=27c47fa55bf03f5ea8360de4117ef912dcc019d8

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 1 month ago

Meghan Markle 'wants peace' with Princess Kate under 1 condition (Daily Express)

https://archive.ph/1sUhm

The royal sister-in-laws could perhaps bury the hatchet on terms Meghan wants to dictate, according to a source.

Boomerang royals Meghan Markle and Prince Harry might have returned to the UK, but the Duchess of Sussex will only build bridges with her sister-in-law, Catherine, on one condition, a source claims. The Sussexes and their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, returned to the UK last week to begin a new life after six years living in the US.

The family is said to be settling in the UK for an “extended period” of time amid speculation about how long they will stay and where they will live, with the Cotswolds being suggested as the most likely destination. Being back in Britain will throw Meghan and Harry's relationship with Prince William and his wife, Catherine, in the spotlight, as the two couples have reportedly drifted apart while the Sussexes were away in California.

According to the National Examiner, Meghan, 45, would like to heal the rift with her sister-in-law Catherine, 44, but "not if it means she has to beg".

The source added that "Meghan isn't going to grovel to anybody, least of all Kate" and that the Duchess had "very strong boundaries" to protect herself from traumatic experiences.

First: Who told Claw that Kate even wants to see her?

Second: Does Claw intend to keep up the story that Kate made her cry?

Third: Kate doesn't need Claw. Not at all. Kate is a star in her own right, and William knows he is the lucky one to have her by his side. Claw is "Harry's wife." Without Harry, she is nobody.

So Claw can rest easy: Kate doesn't want to see her. She isn't interested in even having her around. Claw doesn't even have to bother begging Kate for anything, because for Kate, Claw doesn't exist.

express.co.uk
u/Human-Economics6894 — 1 month ago

If I were a rich man (Topol, Fiddler On The Roof, Neil Sean's gossips)

https://preview.redd.it/t21wfukm37nh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=0b1bb002da31e80fc82fd03bf80415275cc9465e

https://preview.redd.it/vvoe74z6w6nh1.png?width=3649&format=png&auto=webp&s=d58e77f6f4a7c6eefa3bba77efef8664da438b55

I don't know why I put Topol. It's just that, out of the millions of songs in musicals, that one is automatically Topol singing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBHZFYpQ6nc

🎼I'd see my wife, my Golde, looking like a rich man's wife
With a proper double-chin
Supervising meals to her heart's delight
I see her putting on airs and strutting like a peacock
Oy, what a happy mood she's in
Screaming at the servants, day and night🎼

If that looks like Claw to you guys... it does to me too 🤭😜

ALWAYS ME ! MARKLE EXPLODES HARRY GETS IT - UK QUIVERS LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xykNIylLA40

Trump had a few words for the Harkles.

Asked in the White House about his reaction to the departure from the US of Harry and Claw, Trump said: “I’m happy about it. I was not a fan.” Trump believes the couple had treated the monarchy with “great disrespect” and if he was in the Royal Family he “would not have taken them back”.

The issue here isn't whether or not they agree with Trump. It’s the fact that—wasn't Claw supposedly considering a diplomatic career? But she doesn't understand that such a path requires playing the soft power game. And she proved to be utterly mediocre.

Claw's complete inability to understand how things work was reflected in 2019, when Trump paid a state visit to the UK.

https://preview.redd.it/q7ubevp3y6nh1.png?width=2000&format=png&auto=webp&s=4c7b216af586d8664779f3fbead351a6500eaeb7

Claw’s utter inability to understand how things work was evident in 2019 when Trump paid a state visit to the UK.

It turns out that a few days earlier, *The Sun* had interviewed Trump in the Oval Office and mentioned that, back in 2016—during an appearance on *The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore*—Meghan Markle (then an actress on *Suits* and, by 2019, Harry’s wife) had called Trump "misogynistic" and "divisive," adding that she was considering moving to Canada if he won the election.

After expressing his hope that the new mom (Claw had just given birth to Archie) was "doing well," Trump added that he didn't know Markle had spoken out against him. "I didn't know that," he said. "No, I didn't know she was so nasty."

https://people.com/politics/trump-denies-calling-meghan-markle-nasty/

There was quite a stir over that, because Trump also called Hillary Clinton "nasty".

That is why Claw caused such a huge scene when Trump visited in 2019. Harry was supposed to attend that State Banquet; he couldn't go because Claw stopped him. He was expected to stand in solidarity with her. Even when the Queen herself asked Claw to realize that she should at least put in an appearance for about 15 minutes, Claw refused.

Sean says the Queen seems to have been genuinely angry with the Harkles because Harry didn't show up for the private lunch hosted for Trump that day—nor did he attend the viewing at the Art Gallery, which displayed items from the Royal Collection of great historical significance to the United States. It happened because the Queen threw out an "Are you coming?" that apparently didn't sound like a grandmother speaking, but rather like what she was: the Queen.

The point of this story, for me, is the fact that being a royal really isn't as easy as people think. There are privileges, but damn, when duty weighs on you, it’s a heavy burden. Claw decided not to fulfill his duty, which was a rude thing to do.

Am I making excuses for Trump? No. But I’ve learned—I swear, the hard way—that often you have to keep your eye on the priority, and simply act as if you haven’t heard certain things, because they aren’t worth giving any weight to.

The fact that Trump was rude does not excuse Claw for being rude. Rudeness should not be met with rudeness. And keep that in mind, because it is precisely the reason that has most effectively closed the doors on Harry—preventing him from even setting foot in Windsor.

After all, Trump has remained quite clear about his opinion of the Harkles over the years. And Harry came to Claw’s defense, being openly rude to Trump at a time when he failed to grasp not only that he shouldn't have done so, but that his position was hanging by a thread. It still hangs by a thread.

She has kept her mouth shut, but has constantly pushed Harry to speak out against Trump. How does she do it? As always, by crying.

https://preview.redd.it/qsrfrapo27nh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=e3ff19102b1e399fb0368cd11db0c4b098b810cb

As far as Claw is concerned, Trump is to blame for the fact that *As Ever* wasn't a massive success. Claw views it as Trump sabotaging her, and she’ll likely play that card again now that *As Ever* has gone belly-up. The question is: why *should* he help her? She was rude to him, and Harry was rude to him, too. If Claw were truly smart, she’d play both sides—staying in good with both God and the Devil.

https://preview.redd.it/1afa2uvn37nh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=ad576e5e1d0c4c07b9b147184462a9c389975fbc

But Claw lives in a world where she remembers every slight, no matter how trivial. Which is silly.

Harry is whipping up a word salad for a statement against Trump—all because she cried. Again. He married her; that’s his punishment.

HARRY & THAT 'VISA' PROBLEM - THIS IS WHAT IS HAPPENING

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KuqDARQZ_o

Harry really ought to realize that the best thing he can do is hole up in some remote UK village and not leave for the next 15 years. After all, just because he’s back in the UK doesn’t mean his visa issue is resolved.

But Sean is right: there’s no point pretending we don’t know Harry didn’t fill out that application—and even if he had, he would have told the truth. Besides, did what he said even matter? I mean, how many Vegas parties did he have to throw for the US to realize he was really good at drinking and doing drugs?

If Harry lived in the US despite his well-known public background, it was because Biden and Trump turned a blind eye to his situation. Pursuing the matter further won't change that.

Sean doesn't believe Harry's problem was really about the visa. Nor does he buy a recent headline claiming Harry doesn't want to stay near Althorp because it was Diana's home and brings up too many painful memories.

Sean puts it simply:

"Oh, grow up!"

https://preview.redd.it/vxxd48la67nh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=dca302ec35ee0431e3b6ff95510ee3678837a47f

Sean says no, that isn't the reason. It seems the stay with Uncle Charles didn't go as well as Harry wanted people to believe.

Regarding the visa, Sean says he isn't downplaying the seriousness of the document—because it is serious. But the fact remains that Harry is not an ordinary citizen. And whether we like it or not, that’s just how things work.

Because that’s how power works.

Now, Sean recounts a rumor that circulated a few years back. An old Hollywood urban legend claimed that Clark Gable was driving the car involved in a 1933 hit-and-run accident that killed actor Raul Roulien. MGM studio head Louis B. Mayer allegedly covered it up and conspired with the local prosecutor to have a lower-ranking executive take the blame, in exchange for a lifelong position on the payroll at a higher salary. A compliant press kept the story quiet.

It’s not that Sean claims the story is true, but that was the rumor circulating back then—and the truth is, it hasn't changed even now, nearly a hundred years later. Because, while it might not involve Gable specifically, the dark side of Hollywood is a very murky place.

Nothing changes.

Sean says he starts from the premise that Harry didn't fill in anything, because Harry isn't interested in doing so—just as he isn't concerned about perjury in court or the lies he told in *Spare*. Harry has no scruples; he doesn't stop to consider whether what he is doing is wrong. Sean says he doubts Harry will face any consequences regarding the visa issue.

Sean says the visa is the least of Harry's problems. That wasn't the reason he returned to the UK.

MARKLE REVENGE NOTCHES UP EVEN HIGHER IN THIS DAMNING PLOT SETBACK

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97roM0cLkqc

We will find out sooner or later why Harry came back. But in the meantime, the situation with the Harkles is very murky and unclear.

That is why Harry's former friends are happy to be just that—former friends.

It also seems like Jessica Mulroney is playing up the "so you dumped me? Too bad" angle. Mulroney is launching a lifestyle brand for "women in the middle of transition."

https://preview.redd.it/k8bbpm32e7nh1.png?width=634&format=png&auto=webp&s=8de7eb6818c87de83a191c818c006a4fd39000ee

The difference is that this operates as a membership-based community.

The other difference is that Jessica still moves in high-society circles. Unlike Claw, Jessica actually cared about her brand and took the time to launch it properly.

She has observed what successful people do, so she plans to host live events for her products, test them in front of the audience, and not block comments—doing exactly everything that Claw has refused to do.

Ultimately, if Jessica succeeds, it will be a success where Claw failed.

But there are similarities. Because it looks like Jessica is going to sell candles... but she has a wick tester 🤣🤣🤣🤣

FERGIE & MARKLE ROYAL DOWNFALL PLAN! LATEST INSIDER NEWS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2HM_i5_fco

Sean says Harry and Claw are cut from the same cloth. And I’ve realized that’s true. The Harkles—both of them—are going to stick to their story, no matter what happens.

Take the whole "unconscious bias" thing. Sean doesn't get the idea of ​​being around someone you dislike... No, Sean says, "You either like someone or you don't." He says that’s because he’s a Northerner. And honestly, yesterday we got a huge dose of Sean in "I don't want to be mean, but..." mode 🤣🤣🤣🤣 When Sean is in one of those moods, he goes straight for the jugular.

That’s why even he loses patience with the Harkles—especially given the stories they tell, which not only make no sense but are outright lies. That’s why Sean is on William’s side: you have to stay away from the Harkles. They’re bad news.

But the Harkles love word salad.

Although, in Harry's defense, I don't think he uses nonsensical expressions just to sound smart. I think he has no idea what he's saying because he's never used a dictionary 😈😈

https://preview.redd.it/0r4te0ppi7nh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=c80fe5fea91edb4d95823e83b4479189b90c4a21

And as if the BRF hadn't had enough of disastrous comebacks, here she comes again.

https://preview.redd.it/t7c5z882j7nh1.png?width=580&format=png&auto=webp&s=152876aa7c7cc0d8743fac62c6d7e855320182eb

Sean has worked with Fergie; he has said that while he got to meet her when she was being charming, she can be terrible otherwise. He recounted a story about a fellow publicist who met her at a café; the publicist was wearing a linen suit, and Fergie’s opening question to her was, "Don't you have an iron?" That was how Fergie introduced herself. Sean says his friend—who is from Staffordshire—shot back, "Yes, but no iron in the world could smooth out all the problems with your disastrous public relations."

https://preview.redd.it/vjzgts9rj7nh1.png?width=656&format=png&auto=webp&s=611b5f50831c1eb080ac2c11b5edb2ad8f3685d4

Sean had already mentioned that before—how his friend had taken off after the way Fergie showed up while he was talking about the matter of Fergie’s money, another great mystery for the British Royal Family.

The press is saying that Claw and Fergie are going to team up to attack the BRF.

No, Fergie won't be teaming up with Claw. That’s because Fergie can’t stand Claw; they never got along. Sean knows this because an *Access Hollywood* reporter—it seems it was Kit Hoover—who interviewed Fergie a few years ago (in 2023) mentioned that she had asked not to be asked about Claw. And behind the scenes, Fergie explained why: she called the Harkles "bad news" and said she wanted nothing to do with them.

That’s where that remark Fergie made came from: that she barely knew Claw, and that she hadn’t taught him how to bow.

Sean says that, in Claw's defense, Fergie is also far from the truth...

I don't know how saying Fergie is just as much of a liar as Claw counts as a "defense" 😄😄😄😄

But the fact is, Fergie has absolutely no relationship with the Harkles. In fact, Harry has no relationship with Beatrice and Eugenie. They are angry with Harry because he didn't support them.

They’ve realized that Harry and Claw only expect support but never offer it to anyone else. And they don't want to get mixed up in the Harkle circus—especially now that Eugenie has a baby at home. They don't want to be dragged into it.

As for Fergie, if she wants an interview, she’ll have to spill something about the Harkles. She doesn’t really want to do it, but if she does have to reveal something, it will be against the Harkles, not in their favor.

https://preview.redd.it/y9zmk37yl7nh1.png?width=728&format=png&auto=webp&s=dbdb5b3d891a0b019ff5d05a513d5e01336a7e14

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 1 month ago

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle sending children to ritzy $35K-a-year prep school (Page Six)

It’s not that I believe it’s true. Page Six isn't exactly an outlet that actually has sources.

But it is curious how, for the past two weeks, the only thing we’ve read about the Harkles is how much money they’ll spend on a house, how much they’ll spend on the children’s school... followed by complaints that they don’t have security.

https://pagesix.com/2026/09/02/royal-family/prince-harry-meghan-markle-sending-children-to-ritzy-35k-a-year-prep-school/

https://archive.is/atWG9

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s two children will attend a posh UK prep school with a hefty tuition fee.

Prince Archie, 7, and Princess Lilibet, 5, will be students at a private school that costs more than $35,000 a year, Page Six can exclusively reveal.

The ritzy institution features several state-of-the-art amenities like an indoor swimming pool, a fitness center, expansive grass playing fields and multiple AstroTurf sports pitches. It also has river access for boating and kayaking.

Additionally, the campus has art studios, a cooking room, multiple science labs, a large theater and a music and performing arts center featuring practice rooms, classrooms, rehearsal spaces, a recital hall and a beautiful garden.

Pupils also have access to a gourmet dining hall that serves breakfast, lunch, and supper with a variety of intricate dishes including falafel and slow-roasted lamb shoulder.

Page Six has decided not to name the school for privacy reasons.

Page Six exclusively reported that the Sussexes dropped a staggering six figures to charter a private jet across the pond for the big move. They landed at Birmingham Airport at lunchtime last Wednesday.

Sources also told Page Six that the As Ever founder, 45, and Harry, 41, enlisted British hedge fund billionaire Ian Wace to help them financially with their relocation. It is not believed that he is funding their entire stay.

The Marshall Wace LLP CEO is worth $1.2 billion.

There is a problem with that figure, however: 1) $35,000 ...dollars, not pounds. $35,000 is roughly equivalent to £26,500. By UK standards, $35,000 a year is not considered expensive for a school. In fact, it falls well below the average cost of private education in that country.

  • Day schools: The national average for non-boarding students is around £22,500 to £23,000 per year (approximately $30,000 USD).
  • boarding school: The national average cost of a private boarding school in the UK ranges from approximately £42,500 to £54,000 per year (roughly $55,000 to $70,000 USD). Elite schools like the Eton College you mentioned exceed $80,000 USD per year.
  1. It’s not a luxury school. Not even an expensive one. It’s pretty standard, even considering what it supposedly offers. Bedford School, Monmouth School, Shiplake College—they all offer those same things, and they aren't that expensive.

I’m not looking into the school; I’m not interested in that. What strikes me is why the Harkles are allowing things like this to be published—flaunting such lavish spending that sounds so... vulgar? No, it sounds "nouveau riche"... Yes, vulgar too.

But the absurd thing is the situation itself.

"Look at us: we can charter a private jet to transport just four people. And we pay for a very, very expensive school—which isn't actually expensive, but we’ll pretend it is."

Why are they flaunting their money like this? I don't get it. To make people envious? Someone who only owns a timeshare in Portugal doesn't make me envious. To show off success? Success isn't demonstrated by showing off—after all, what is evident needs no explanation. (Juan Gabriel) To provoke William? William isn't interested in that. The Royal Family knows that if the Harkles were truly successful, they wouldn't have returned to the UK.

What are they after? What do you all think?

u/Human-Economics6894 — 1 month ago

When a woman is forced to confess a fault of her own, she immediately believes herself to have become a victim. (Etienne Rey, Neil Sean's gossips)

This quote by the French writer Etienne Rey (1879–1965) highlights a cynical view of human defense mechanisms and the ego in moments of responsibility.

At this point, one can only view the Harkles cynically, because they themselves have taken things to a level of brazenness that I do not recall having a parallel.

SUSSEX SLITHER TO MAKE WALES'S LIFE VERY CRUEL INDEED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ9LvjZvrck

One of the things the Harkles can't stand about William and Kate is that they simply ignore them. And not just since 2020; they’ve been ignoring them for a long time before that.

https://preview.redd.it/361mi6sqqsmh1.png?width=631&format=png&auto=webp&s=28974609c4eb4a0dfa7033bfa12e315a120492af

In *Revenge*, Tom Bower recounted how Claw was obsessively driven to know what the Cambridges were doing—to know everything. Around 2024, Neil Sean dedicated several *By Royal Appointment* segments to Claw’s obsession with getting William alone, and how she could not bear the fact that he kept avoiding her. Back then, I still thought Sean was exaggerating a bit... but no, not at all. In fact, Robert Jobson confirmed everything Sean had said, albeit in a toned-down version. But yes, "Claw" had an unhealthy obsession with William—one that was well-known at the Palace.

And we know that Harry has spent years in despair because William has already buried the relationship and has no intention of visiting that grave.

So, for William and Kate, having the Harkles in the UK is a real headache—because the Harkles have never stopped trying to upstage the working royals.

It drove the Harkles crazy that William and Kate kept their schedule so restricted—a strategy that caused the Harkles to do a huge number of stupid things.

https://preview.redd.it/0x0v3skassmh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=3c679c7d4199d807cadff7b7ebdbcdcafb51051a

Claw didn't even have the good sense to realize that promoting an apple spread on the day Dolly Parton's passing was announced was a bad idea—a very bad one, because Dolly has a massive fan base that won't buy that jam for that very reason. But Claw always believes—because that’s how she sees things—that people (meaning us) want to know more about her and see her, and that her speeches are interesting and moving.

https://preview.redd.it/r68qro5yssmh1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=3b032c8ac2a723e49a0637509a6989a5b6ee9397

Whenever he can, Sean mocks what happened on MasterChef—you know, "Oh, Claw was so nice, she was so charming." Sean says, "She’s a former actress; it’s no big deal." Sean dedicated a video to talking about people he met while working at Al Fayed’s radio station—he met George Michael, Madonna, Dolly Parton, Michael Jackson... So, who is Meghan Markle? She’s just the woman who married someone from the British Royal Family who has disgraced himself. Oh, and Sean goes, "I don't want to be mean, but..." 🤭🤭🤭

In all of this, Claw decided to follow the money rather than Thomas Markle, proving that she is a woman devoid of compassion. That won't change when she eventually gives her version of what Thomas may or may not have done to her; she fails to see that if she drops a bombshell on the matter, public opinion won't view her as a victim, but rather as someone who took being despicable to a whole new level.

If you missed Neil Sean’s previous videos and are wondering why the Royal Family isn't doing anything about Thomas, it is because they aren't entirely clear on what is actually going on. However, the issue hasn't been forgotten. According to a reliable source cited by Sean, King Charles III confronted the Harkles during the July meeting regarding Thomas and what their intentions were. Charles did not like the answer: the Harkles have no desire to reach out to Thomas. Sean also reported that Charles Spencer apparently asked them the same question—not for the first time. When Thomas Markle underwent an amputation, Sean learned from a reliable source that William and KC3 were horrified by the behavior of both—but especially Harry—and by their dismissive attitude. So, Claw doesn't seem to realize that the fact she has a "version" of events is by no means a sign that she holds the winning hand. Quite the opposite.

William and King Charles III are fed up with Harry and his failure to grasp that he is out of the fold. They find it exhausting to keep reminding him: "You left, you stepped down, you are out." Now it’s about Remembrance Sunday: Harry is already playing the "I was a soldier" card to try and worm his way into the event. It is incredible that Harry doesn't understand it isn't "his" event; it is a commemoration of the real soldiers who died defending the UK—not "Bunker Boy."

But William is worried that the Harkles will target Kate’s Christmas event, because he knows they are determined to boycott it if they don’t get an invitation. It’s obvious—both to Sean and to us—that the Harkles will once again play the "olive branch" card, talking about how Christmas is for family, and all that. That’s where I think William is a good person; if someone from the press were to ask me, "Would you invite Meghan to your home for Christmas?" I’d say, "Did she invite her father, Thomas?"

Claw wants to attend Kate’s event and steal the spotlight. Even without an invitation, she is determined to upstage the occasion—a tall order, especially since Sean has let slip that something is going on with the Diana Awards. The foundation organizes in-person galas and fundraisers, and this season’s exclusive event is planned for the luxurious Raffles London at The OWO, located in the historic Old War Office building in Whitehall, London. Claw wants to tag along with Harry to that event... though it seems that once news of her interest got out, table sales took a nosedive.

There might be some morbid curiosity, but not enough to actually raise money. Especially since Harry has never contributed a dime.

FREELOADING FERGIE , ROYAL LODGE & MILLIONS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30Vq2iFAm_8

Sean doesn't understand how anyone can help the Harkles...

Or Fergie.

No millionaire has ever helped him. Or me, either 😭😭😭

Well, it looks like Fergie might be able to return to Royal Lodge... provided she can manage the rent.

Because, yes, Royal Lodge is apparently being rented out for £400,000 a year. But take note: there is also the cost of maintenance—and everything that entails—to consider. A countess—or someone of that ilk—once mentioned that people would say to her, "Oh, you live in a castle," while she would reflect on the fact that people have no idea what it’s actually like to live in one of those houses. It is incredibly expensive.

There are several buildings in the Windsor area that are leased out. Royal Lodge is now joining that list, and KC3 wants that rental income.

Frogmore Cottage is another property being considered for lease, and Harry sees this as his opportunity to return to Windsor by renting it.

https://preview.redd.it/kl1ap65z1tmh1.png?width=1908&format=png&auto=webp&s=bcd37b60b68157a4d39d58aabf6b3eab96c59f60

It seems Harry forgets the fact that he was kicked out precisely for not paying his rent.

https://preview.redd.it/cly7xno52tmh1.png?width=245&format=png&auto=webp&s=66a3160ecf4110699714fc5ac1bad9f7ef5cd8f8

Harry believes he has found a way to return to Windsor, failing to realize that they won't lease it to him. Not to him—nothing at Windsor.

That said, Fergie has returned to the UK with plans to "tell her story."

But Sean is certain that no one will believe her; it is obvious that she lacks credibility. That isn't the point, though. The point is that Fergie thinks she can command a huge fee, when in reality, there are no TV channels right now that can afford to pay what she is asking. And if she wants a big payout, she will be required to provide documentary evidence and the like.

https://preview.redd.it/9t9z6qc33tmh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=0bf14b737bab0ec07c3b5954dc521e8aa9d71b44

And let's not forget Beatrice and Eugenie, who want to save their own skins.

There are journalists willing to conduct the interview, but they know they will have to look at what Emily Maitlis did with Andrew, and the matter is complicated. It is a huge risk.

One risk to consider is this: would anyone want their brand associated with a TV show where Fergie dishes on things that are pure, unbridled sensationalism?

And of course, there is the fact that it is an ongoing investigation, so there is a lot of risk involved in all of this.

ACTING MARKLE AFTER GUY RITCHIE THIS NOW LOOMS LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPjiYl1cmyo

Claw believes that when she appears on a red carpet, the world stands still. And Sean says that Claw is partly right: there is a lot of publicity—not always positive; in fact, often negative—but publicity nonetheless.

Guy Ritchie capitalized on all the publicity Claw gave him... she didn't.

Having Kim Kardashian lined up for *The Gentlemen* worked out well for Guy. But Sean says it wasn't all smooth sailing; Guy and his team were well aware of the harsh criticism that emerged when people thought he had hired Claw.

How did Sean find out about this? Through the movie where Claw made a cameo.

https://preview.redd.it/qhh6ncex5tmh1.png?width=399&format=png&auto=webp&s=6571b08b711cd20d2bccd7c88de8f53e1122f683

Sean has mentioned that he has someone there who gives him the scoop—or rather, the son passes the gossip on to his father, and the father tells Sean.

https://preview.redd.it/xvb4fmp46tmh1.png?width=3220&format=png&auto=webp&s=6631d717d5c5e240415a8249bd193219aa6627ed

Sean has already said that they aren't at all happy about the Claw situation. So, that cameo depended on how she actually behaved. But after the strong backlash against Guy Ritchie, they are seriously considering whether or not it's worth keeping Claw on board. It’s the same old story: publicity—it’s all about publicity.

Keep in mind that they already have a problem with Brie Larson. She is an excellent actress, but she spoke out too much and drew a lot of negative criticism. Is having Claw worth it?

The decision hasn't been made yet, but it will be the ultimate litmus test for Claw. And I suspect that if any door was left open, this cameo is going to close it.

PULLING IN TOTALLY DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS - WHO WILL CAVE IN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aa9FBS5rNdU

The Harkles are united by an all-consuming envy of William and Kate. But otherwise, Harry and Claw are facing increasing problems because they are at odds over fundamental issues.

It’s not that Harry doesn’t see things; he chooses to ignore them—he chooses to remain deluded. There is very little doubt about that. Harry has settled into the comfortable position of "out of sight, out of mind," even when things reach absurd levels. Sean recounted the story about the Beyoncé message from the Harkles' documentary; he said that no one at Netflix saw that message, and that he was told Harry hadn't seen it either.

https://preview.redd.it/ex2x1lyb8tmh1.png?width=1492&format=png&auto=webp&s=619780b4dbe1ab815817507036b81efc28d6f608

You might say, "Sean is making that up." No, Sean isn't that creative 🤣🤣, because even *he* doesn't get it—what do you mean Harry didn't see him? It’s just too absurd. But that’s what Netflix told him.

Sean says that Harry chooses not to see things. But he does see them. And he saw that Claw didn't have the connections he thought she did, nor was she really who she claimed to be.

Sean says that one of the things that shook Harry up was seeing that George was already old enough to attend Eton. That came as a blow, and Harry realized that none of that would happen for his own children. Harry decided to return to what he knew, but that was because he was beginning to grasp that Claw had misrepresented things back in 2019.

But that doesn't change the fact that Harry accepted everything that happened because he received so much during those years; he should have realized it wasn't because of his talents, yet he believed he deserved it all. That has always been his worst mistake: his own arrogance.

Sean says that Ted Sarandos would have liked to keep the Harkles close, but found it impossible, because it was impossible to convince Netflix employees to do anything for two people as arrogant and full of themselves as the Harkles.

According to Sean, what exhausted Ted Sarandos's patience was the pair's inflated sense of their own financial worth. Claw, in particular, believed she deserved far more money because she is *so* famous!

Harry then began to feel uncomfortable, as he was only at ease doing the things he used to do as a royal. So, arguments ensued.

But Sean insists that no, there won't be a divorce, because Harry is a coward and Claw is a leech.

The thing is, Harry is the one lying about how things will play out. He sold Claw on the idea that if they live in the UK, they’ll get the security they want and save three to five million a year. The lie behind that is Harry’s belief that he can secure that protection regardless of where they live later on—meaning he thinks he can keep it even if he travels to Australia or Claw goes to the US. Sean and I see it the same way: Harry doesn't have a clue.

https://preview.redd.it/z8ak59ftctmh1.png?width=1194&format=png&auto=webp&s=75deb3f8098d68b813cafe12c09f2d113a2a4346

Burnham has to go speak with the King at Balmoral. The Harry issue is bound to come up, and Sean believes that—true to form for Labour—they will try to pin the blame on the Royal Family. That would be unfair, given that King Charles III told Harry to pay for his own security. But if they want to hear Harry out, that is the government's problem.

And Burnham ought to take a stand on the matter, because Harry is being a real thorn in everyone's side about it—since he, in turn, is being pressured by that other thorn in the side, Claw.

Claw doesn't want to give anything up. Yet she once again plays the "I gave it up for you" card, knowing full well that Harry wants the marriage to work. Let's be clear: Harry has a warped idea of ​​what love is, and he will never leave Claw, because doing so would mean admitting that nothing that has happened over the past few years was worth it.

All of this is creating a lot of tension, and they are drifting apart, even though neither of them knows what to do.

The Palace is well aware of what lies behind the situation with the Harkles, and they are clear on the fact that Harry isn't exactly the sharpest tool in the shed. This makes their next moves—to put it mildly—confusing. Sean says that, so far, the Harkles have managed to keep a low profile. But that isn't by choice; it’s because "Claw" doesn't want people to know where she actually is—whether in the US or the UK. Harry, on the other hand, wants to step out and be photographed with his children; he wants to play the part of the good, devoted father.

Now, does Harry want to return to royal life? According to the press, the answer is no; Harry wants to immerse himself in English life, whereas Claw has no interest in that. But the fact remains that the whole situation is extremely murky, and William prefers to keep as much distance as possible.

https://preview.redd.it/nnykhv6nftmh1.png?width=760&format=png&auto=webp&s=46eb98eceb417230a3adf7c75eb365b873e6b985

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 1 month ago

'Nervous' Meghan fears leaving 'gilded cage' luxury UK estate to do school run with Archie and Lilibet without security

https://preview.redd.it/7w4v86wwzrmh1.png?width=934&format=png&auto=webp&s=c51f3b2a4f8849320a841fce290e64eec8ed6889

https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/40230552/meghan-fears-school-run-without-security/

THE Duchess of Sussex is nervous about doing the school run while security for her family remains unsettled, a pal says.

Meghan and Harry are in a secret luxury countryside location after returning to the UK.

The pair have barely left the house since arriving last week and she is said to be worried about driving Archie, seven, and Lilibet, five, to and from their prep school.

Having a regular drop-off and pick-up time increases the security risk, the friend says.

The pal added: “The school run is a tricky issue and I understand they are nervous about it.”

Critics say the pair, who gave up up royal duties to move to California in 2020, are “prisoners of their own making” by coming back without protection in place.

Sorry, but wasn't this supposed to be used in at least a couple more weeks? Is TW already using this now? Girl, you haven't even been in the UK for a week! And you're already pulling the "damsel in distress" stunt?

https://preview.redd.it/7lq0ewvk0smh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=ede392f9e526e05ea3513f2248013da068192fb9

P.S.: Could someone please help with the link shortener!!!!

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 1 month ago

A lie may fool someone else, but it tells you the truth: you're weak. (Tom Wolfe, Neil Sean's gossips)

I’ve been at this since 2019. 2019. It’s 2026 now, and I’m still just as dumbfounded by the Harkles; it’s incredible that, after all these years, they haven’t understood a thing. There is no war to win—they lost. Lie after lie—it’s beyond saving now.

THIS IS JUST NOT THE TRUTH- SUSSEXES LAWYERS, DEMANDS & MORE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Itel7FCfAA

Claw is definitely a pathological liar.

But I increasingly believe that Harry is worse than Claw, because he is a guy who simply has absolutely no control over his lies anymore.

And nothing reflects that better than his demands regarding security. From the initial claim to the appeal, it was all just one lie after another. What’s even more absurd is that Harry got angry when the Palace sent the judge detailed emails and all sorts of documents exposing the fact that he was lying blatantly. Now, as he keeps making demands, Harry has conveniently wiped from his memory the fact that he walked out on the UK, that he quit, that he is no longer a working royal, and that he is a private citizen with a noble title. That was his choice, but he doesn't see it that way.

And every complaint costs the government and the British people money. Oh yes. Because the fact that an official wastes time answering Harry's calls means British taxpayers' money is being squandered on Mr. Petulance.

https://preview.redd.it/zieyzqx4mlmh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=53f52968a15fda407907be006003a95397c040b3

Sean says that at this point, it is the government and the Home Secretary who need to put a stop to this—by saying "no, and enough with the complaints"—and by fully disclosing the costs Harry has incurred.

Harry is focused on that—focused on his own miserable, petty desires. And he doesn't see what's coming his way. Sean, who has had some insight into the Sentebale case, has been saying for quite a while that the whole thing is going to blow up in September and it won't be pretty. But since yesterday or the day before, Sean has been hinting that the African Parks saga isn't over yet. Sean had said the main question for the moment was whether Harry had been fired or had quit, but today he says something is brewing in the courts. He’s left the gossip hanging again 🤬🤬🤬, but it looks like we won't have to wait long, since the matter has had a legal dimension for quite some time.

Harry thinks he can just ignore the Sentebale situation, and that the African Parks matter isn't his problem. So, he’s focused on security because... well, what was that article where he said, "Oh, how terrible—my guards can't hit people with a baseball bat; they can only use words to keep them away"? I swear, I read just today—August 30, 2026—that a source claimed Harry was arguing exactly that. Who told Harry that’s what a bodyguard does?

https://preview.redd.it/iyu44yy5olmh1.png?width=1053&format=png&auto=webp&s=45395cbb08e0adc7cebba32b0674b82f6fea587b

It is untrue that Harry had not been informed that Al-Qaeda had allegedly threatened to kill him after he revealed he had killed 25 Taliban fighters. It is untrue because what Al-Qaeda said in 2023 itself made headlines.

PLEASE: I am not advocating for Al-Qaeda, but it is necessary for people to know what that group said and why what Harry is doing is unacceptable.

In its published magazine, *One Ummah* (Issue 8), Al-Qaeda calls on its members to exact justice for the actions of the prince, whom they refer to as "Al-Zanim." It also urges the British Crown to withdraw security and protection from Harry to "make way for Islamic hands to exact just retribution..."

Likewise, they condemn the media for focusing solely on the sexual aspects described in his biography, "as if Afghan blood commanded no respect whatsoever in this arrogant mindset."

Prince Al-Zanim’s confession that he killed twenty-five Afghan Muslims in cold blood—and that, in his eyes, they were merely chess pieces—reveals the extent of the condescension, discrimination, and penchant for criminality embedded in the genes of this type of human being.

Al-Qaeda also takes for granted that Princess Diana was murdered by the Crown, questions King Charles’s paternity, and asserts that Harry’s biography has brought about the downfall of European civilization, stating: “After his mother’s death, he believed the palace was involved in her murder, which led him to drug addiction; following his mother’s killing, his father—the King—showed him no concern whatsoever, perhaps because the King doubts his lineage and does not regard him as his son by blood. This fallen royal family and King Charles—a descendant of the Crusader leaders of history—were not the biggest losers from the public revelation of these scandals; rather, the arrogant English mindset and European civilization as a whole are the greatest losers due to what was revealed.”

https://elle.mx/celebridades/2023/02/16/al-qaeda-ordena-muerte-principe

https://www.larazon.es/gente/qaeda-ordena-asesinato-principe-harry-haber-dado-muerte-25-afganos_2023021463ebe198b670df00014d0ab5.html

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/1/6/taliban-decries-prince-harry-over-comment-on-afghan-killings

That bit about the Crusades still makes me laugh 🤣

Just to give you some examples: a Mexican publication, a Spanish one, and an Arab one. In other words, the story made headlines worldwide.

That nonsense published by that pro-Al-Qaeda outlet was just that—nonsense—because the Taliban leader at the time, Anas Haqqani, seized the opportunity to label Harry’s actions as war crimes; after all, let us not forget that the International Criminal Court has accused Taliban members of various international crimes. Therefore, it is untrue that there is a threat against Harry, as the Taliban benefit more from having him alive than in the grave.

https://www.itv.com/news/2023-01-06/senior-taliban-leader-hits-out-at-harrys-claim-he-killed-25-in-afghanistan

So much so that we should recall how furious the British military was—not with Al-Qaeda, but with Harry—because his big mouth had put British troops at risk.

Former Colonel Tim Collins said, "That is not how one behaves in the army."

Colonel Richard Kemp, a former army officer who was sent to Kabul in 2003 to take command of forces in Afghanistan, said that such comments could provide "propaganda to the enemy."

And so the list of active-duty and retired military personnel goes on—all of them telling Harry to keep his mouth shut.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-64185176

So it is an absolute lie that Harry knew nothing about this, because it was in the news even in Chile!!! And obviously, Harry received more than one very harsh letter from the military and—as Sean says—from the government as well. Sean says, how many Prime Ministers have told Harry to shut up? Let's see... 2023: Sunak, Starmer, and now Burnham.

But Harry won't shut up!!!! 😭😭😭😭

https://preview.redd.it/xn563s99ulmh1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=15a58e45dee8c004da794bf1639acbb7fd3dee54

To begin with, there is the fact that Harry complains about having to call a specific number if he runs into trouble. Last year, when Harry complained about this same issue, Sean was furious; he mentioned that a friend of his had faced a problem and they were still waiting for the police to arrive. Sean is bringing that up again now: his friend was burglarized, called the police, that person was given other numbers to call, and that was it. This matter deeply bothers Sean—especially since, if you watch his videos, he is extremely critical of the Mayor of London regarding this issue of public safety.

Sean says that at a certain social level, you are offered priority access to a specific local police station; they discuss certain precautions to take—such as installing a panic alarm—and suggest a direct number and a specific contact person.

It seems Harry missed something Neil Sean was saying, delivered in that oh-so-sweet tone of voice, right as Sean twisted the knife.

Yes, another "I don't mean to be mean, but..." moment... 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳

Sean points out something obvious: Harry intends to live in an area surrounded by high-profile people "who are equally of, if not more standing, because of their wealth and power and the positions that they hold in office, not just two people playing around at being whatever they're playing around at."

https://preview.redd.it/u4u2vt2gwlmh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=164cc038be8b7059145d40c2d669f5ce1960baf3

Sean twists the knife, "They might be related to the royals... Well, Harry, but that's it"

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Perhaps Harry did realize that in the Cotswolds, he would be the smallest fish in a very, very exclusive pond—among people who have no affection for him and, worse yet, no qualms about saying so, like Jeremy Clarkson. So, Sean says in another video today that there’s no certainty the Harkles will actually end up in the Cotswolds. It could be somewhere else. How about a farm in North Korea?

Every time Harry writes to or calls the Ministry, it costs the British taxpayer money. Every review Harry requests—and is granted—comes at the British taxpayer's expense. Mahmood knows this, yet for some reason, he is part of the government faction that believes Harry serves their interests.

The King has left the problem to the government. KC3 won't lift a finger about it. It’s a sort of "you guys caused this, so now you deal with Harry" attitude.

The funny thing is, Burnham now has to deal with a 42-year-old man who acts like a three-year-old, someone who thinks that just because he’s the King’s son, a prince of this-or-that, aand a symbol of the Crown of wherever, he’s on the same level as David Cameron, Sunak, or Liz Truss. Harry is demanding a level of security not like William's, but like a Prime Minister's—or, in fact, the level Trump has.

And if Starmer didn't realize that when he agreed to the nonsense of the review, it should be clear to Burnham by now that this is what Harry wants. The risk, then, isn't to the British Royal Family, but to the politicians. The fact that some upstart with a title thinks he’s on the same level as an elected politician—and that the Labour government is actually entertaining those complaints, isn't that a problem for Labour and its stance on the monarchy?

https://preview.redd.it/hhkh9quxylmh1.png?width=735&format=png&auto=webp&s=67db172629e8d9031a1848506ff9defa8a8c790a

Harry is being offered security, but Sean is right: it is time for the government to put a stop to this before some journalist starts tallying up the cost of every one of Harry’s complaints—incurred thanks to a government that seems to enjoy listening to him gripe.

PALACE PREPARED FOR IT ALL - SPLIT/ LIVING & STAFF LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENQ7O8dexng

https://preview.redd.it/eks6mma21mmh1.png?width=1334&format=png&auto=webp&s=2dc021ed69c2e522808a821d0eae277e9ee2a4c0

Given the highly unusual situation of the Harkles, the Palace is preparing itself. There is a countdown at the Palace to the end of the Harkles' saga, because it is utterly absurd not to see that the Harkles are in crisis.

Sean is certainly not among those who think William should perhaps consider reconciling with Harry. Sean points out that whenever he has run into William, the prince appears very self-assured; when people reach the age of 40, they know exactly what they want—and what they don't. William is focused on the monarchy and his family, and nothing stands in the way of that.

Sean makes it clear that William owes Harry nothing.

So, William is behind the Harkles' "last hurrah."

https://preview.redd.it/g8jzc0fw1mmh1.png?width=317&format=png&auto=webp&s=7038de96b347a70bab7b338ba5538674c3bf2c90

Oh, I love that movie. I recommend it 100,000%; it’s a truly excellent political satire. It was directed by some guy named John Ford. I don't think anyone knows him 😏😏😏🤭🤭

Sean revealed yesterday that Harry and Claw had a major conflict over the statement against Meta. Harry wanted Claw to announce she was leaving Instagram, but she refuses to do so because—as Sean puts it—the one thing Claw truly missed during her time as a senior royal was having social media. She clings more tightly to her Instagram than to her title of Duchess 🤣🤣🤣

Well, just as several of us said here and in newspaper comments: how did the Harkles not realize what they were saying? That bit about Claw going back and forth between the US and the UK... seriously? Leaving a 5-year-old daughter and a 7-year-old son at school all day until Saturday? Claw realized that sort of thing made her look like a bad mother. Darling, you are one—and pretending otherwise is even worse!

Now, if anyone here thought Claw was finally thinking about her children... welcome to the saga! Because no, anyone who’s been following this for a while would never believe something like that. No, Claw isn't thinking about her kids; she’s thinking about two things: 1) obviously, the bad image this projects of her, and 2) the nanny they’d had the longest decided to stay in California.

I mean, Claw is probably figuring that Harry will be left on his own in the UK and will look for a nanny.

Claw lives in the 90s; this is what she imagined.

https://preview.redd.it/qefwls615mmh1.png?width=236&format=png&auto=webp&s=abc11eb729bfe5bc5cb99ca1c1a257e8fa69b05e

Meghan, darling, "The Heather Biblow Story"

https://preview.redd.it/yyyyosr65mmh1.png?width=479&format=png&auto=webp&s=e7f6286eb653200a44e27ca95a5a6568b06332be

Oh God, another "I don't mean to be mean, but..." moment... 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳

Because it turns out that nanny... no, not Heather Biblow, but the one who was actually a nanny... decided to stay in California because she didn't want to uproot herself and make life changes over "a mere whim." Sean says this "allegedly," only to clarify later that he knows it from an excellent source.

In other words, Harry and Claw have arrived in the UK with two children who have been stripped of everyone they knew.

Now, you might scoff and say I’m exaggerating about the nanny thing. But no—it turns out Claw has been hiring staff in the US to travel to the UK as nannies. There will be another team of people looking after the children. I mean, Harry can't handle two small children on his own—some full-time dad he is. 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

And so Claw will travel back to California and then back to London—or the Cotswolds, or somewhere else.

Meanwhile, the Palace sees that the Harkles are determined to play a cloak and dagger.

The Harkles supposedly have another benefactor. Sean can't figure out where they find them, since this toxic couple always seems to have someone helping them out in their desperate moments. One thing Sean is certain of: nothing comes for free.

Sean recalls that the Duke and Duchess of Windsor had a price list—how much it cost to dance with Wallis, how much it cost to sit at David’s table... By the way, whatever happened with that dinner with the Harkles? It seems Sean was right about it being another flop, because nobody wanted to sit with Claw 🤣🤣🤣

Behind the scenes, the Palace has categorically told Sean that there won't be anything remotely resembling a grand welcome for Harry—neither from King Charles III nor, certainly, from William. There is no chance of them returning to the royal fold. Harry has been dropping hints here and there that he doesn't want to return to the royal fold... Yeah, sure.

Now, regarding the prenuptial agreement: Sean points out that Claw knows there isn't one. So, she believes she’ll walk away with millions when she divorces Harry. No—on that point, Sean is adamant: there are absolutely no millions on the horizon for Claw. In fact, Sean notes that Diana didn't really have a divorce settlement; rather, Charles gave her money to support herself while she figured out her next steps. After all, she was the mother of the heir. And within the British Royal Family, there is no personal money, because everything belongs to the Crown—meaning, to whoever holds the throne. Harry isn't going to be the monarch—or is he, Meghan?

Sean says Claw would be lucky if she were given a house—and it would be a "house," not a "mansion." She won't have anywhere near what Diana had. All she'll have is what Harry has, and it doesn't seem like Harry has that much money—otherwise, he wouldn't need benefactors to help him out, would he, Meghan?

The Palace is waiting to see how long the Harkles can keep up Claw’s back-and-forth travel between the US and the UK—especially... oh, Sean 🤣🤣!!!—as winter is coming!!!.

https://preview.redd.it/loms8pna9mmh1.png?width=790&format=png&auto=webp&s=0169850da609283a02129e702bebb9bc2a19cd3c

Sean is not talking about the airport, but "in the dim and dreary and wet and windy Costwolds".

The Palace wants to determine if Harry is the one who started that nonsense about the "Claw" back and forth, and what they hope to achieve by it. However, their actual aim remains unclear to us.

NOT WANTED ANYMORE ..BOMBSHELL LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHRDopmhThM

Sean makes it a rule not to speak beforehand with the people he interviews; he prefers to go straight into the interview. He doesn't want to be told, "Don't ask this, ask that." For Sean, it’s simply a matter of sitting down and talking. They might drop a bombshell or say something interesting—and Sean says that is the goal of an interview.

Sean says that around 2021, when the Harkles sat down with Oprah, he mentioned that they and Oprah had spoken for 42 minutes beforehand—prior to the actual interview starting. That is separate, of course, from the time spent preparing for it. He notes that he faced a lot of criticism for saying that. Sean says the same thing happened with Tom Bradby and the infamous South Africa interview.

https://preview.redd.it/6ipjt6h8bmmh1.png?width=686&format=png&auto=webp&s=601546664a12eee88999efa0c479964c2cd3dc52

Lies, lies, lies.

So, Claw is furious because Oprah is disavowing her and that 2021 interview. Because the matter of that interview had been in the works since before the wedding.

A few weeks ago, at the invitation of *Vanity Fair*, Oprah disavowed *A Million Little Pieces*. She is angry that she will be remembered for that interview, despite having done hundreds of others.

Oprah, it was worse regarding *A Million Little Pieces*.

https://preview.redd.it/tnnw9fh9cmmh1.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=dcb377121cacb0c72a01660df547df35db950126

Sean had already explained that he found out about the Oprah matter because her team requested materials from his studio. Now, Sean is adding something he had previously hinted at in another video: it turns out he knows Archbishop Welby—the man who supposedly married the "Harkles" three days earlier—and he recounted how the Queen apologized to the Archbishop, citing this as proof of just how much the Queen put up with Harry. Sean adds that he personally asked Welby if anyone (implying Oprah or the Harkles) had apologized to him for that lie, and Welby said "No." Oprah should have done so. But no, Oprah hasn't.

Sean says Oprah was after sensationalism, regardless of how cruel it might be to those involved. He says that isn't what he looks for when conducting interviews—he wants a good story. But ITV was also chasing sensationalism; after all, they charged £250,000 per commercial break. That money went to ITV and Oprah—not to the Harkles. And now "Claw" is angry because neither Oprah nor Gayle is backing her up.

https://preview.redd.it/4k1l0x9kdmmh1.png?width=336&format=png&auto=webp&s=df3ca9caaa567911e4595e846e56693d329080e5

MARKLE HARRY & THIS WOMEN WHO IS NOT LETTING GO ..LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kN5EVKNffA

Sean says he knows Camilla and has a great relationship with her son, Tom. He highlights the excellent work she has done since becoming Charles's wife. And I won't dispute that, because I've always liked her.

Claw, on the other hand, is no fan of Camilla. That doesn't cost Camilla a wink of sleep, though; she did everything she could to get along with Claw, and she has nothing to do with the fact that Claw is an unpleasant woman.

Claw wanted to know what she could gain, and from whom. She decided there was nothing to be gained from Camilla. None of this went unnoticed by the Queen. Many people within the BRF tried to get along with Claw, but she told a different story. That is why no one wants to be near Claw now.

So, Sean returns to the subject of the *Daily Mail*’s correction regarding an article about Ginger Spice and the Harkles—a correction the *Mail* issued because Geri demanded it.

And she demanded it because she is very close to Camilla.

https://preview.redd.it/16oi8d7efmmh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=d212c1976301fb58763ee39d05f4d853caa77d11

Geri supports most major causes, and Camilla has taken her along on several visits to charitable organizations—particularly those focused on reading. Geri is an author, primarily of children's books that have enjoyed moderate success.

https://preview.redd.it/srqk41fpfmmh1.png?width=1126&format=png&auto=webp&s=3e4b492c336c3b5d7112a7a1333a238e3e7b8cd0

She has worked extensively with Camilla without making a big fuss about it; she prefers to operate under the radar.

So Geri doesn't want a partnership with the Harkles—not even remotely.

Geri found out where that story came from. And given how annoyed she already is with the press over other matters, she doesn't intend to let this issue drop.

I suspect that "where it came from" starts with "Me" and ends with "ghan" 🤣🤭

SO WHO REALLY FITTED UP PRINCE GEORGE BEHIND THE SCENES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onvuEPXy0Vk

This bit of gossip will be brief because—damn—there was so much tea today, and thank goodness there was no "By Royal" today 🤭🤭

George, who is off to Hogwarts... no, Eton 🤭🤭 (though it looks as if he were heading to Hogwarts) has been spotted at the Billings & Edmonds shop.

https://preview.redd.it/6sj0rvy2hmmh1.png?width=550&format=png&auto=webp&s=162033afec7944d36760af1bd463218427281297

Billings & Edmonds is a traditional supplier with centuries of history, offering formal, elaborate uniforms for elite boarding schools such as Eton College and Harrow School. J.K. Rowling drew inspiration from this shop for "Madame Malkin's Robes for All Occasions" in Diagon Alley.

George had to go for his uniform fitting—something that is a bit intimidating. Sean says the same thing happened to young Margaret and Elizabeth; even though they were homeschooled, they were dressed just as if they were attending school.

Margaret would then go to the shop in Mayfair to have jeans made to measure.

https://preview.redd.it/6wjhs6liimmh1.png?width=2308&format=png&auto=webp&s=0e20b4022bba0739d9bcf2bf0fa638440829ae46

Sean doesn't know if the first-day photo op will take place. I think it will; it’s a major milestone for George, and even though William doesn't remember that day as being incredibly happy, I believe he’ll want to keep the tradition going.

https://preview.redd.it/1pptilsvimmh1.png?width=550&format=png&auto=webp&s=cdb528bde95742030a688f284fad81892049a02f

And hoping I don't get censored, because it's just to encourage reading 😏

https://preview.redd.it/73dgkoz6jmmh1.png?width=700&format=png&auto=webp&s=baff6bf7ceb562233802ba6c4c8e3eddb09525f0

Did anyone ever get past the cover when Fabio was on it? I don't think so 😜

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 2 months ago

I don't know—that's why I'm asking, not challenging it. Why do you think Harry says that "school placements for Archie and Lil'D weren't finalized until August"?

I don't know how the system works in the UK.

But looking at what happened with William and George, that explanation the Harkles gave their acolytes in the press sounds absurd to me.

After all, William and Kate spent over a year looking at schools for George, and his admission to Eton was decided months ago. From what I’ve gathered through comments from many parents, that’s the norm. Money or no money, the whole school thing takes a long time. And I believe enrollment generally closes at least two or three months in advance. I could be wrong here, but I’m under the impression that it has to be finalized before the holidays, right?

Why would the Sussex children only be getting a spot now, just as the school year is about to start?

Can anyone from the UK explain how the scholar system works?

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 2 months ago

'He expects an apology. He's not changed': Friends reveal Harry is 'still angry' with members of the Royal Family - and why his return to Britain is not a change of heart from Megxit (Daily Mail)

A sinner uploaded this file of the article.

I’d like to point out certain words Charlotte Griffiths uses, because it might look like an article in favor of Harry... but it isn’t.

Earlier this month, in a shock announcement, the couple revealed they would be returning to a private, non-royal home, believed to be in the Cotswolds. It is understood that their children, Archie, seven, and Lilibet, five, have been enrolled to start at a local prep school this week. But a source told The Mail on Sunday: ‘Friends who caught up with Harry were expecting to hear noises of contrition and humility.

‘Instead, there will be no imminent mea culpa from Harry by the sounds of things. Far from it, in fact. He is still in that Oprah mindset.

‘They were agog to hear he still feels angry with members of the Royal Family, is still frustrated by the “men in grey suits” who surround his father, and still expects an apology.’

The source said: ‘Friends who have spoken to him since he returned to the UK were surprised to discover that the record has not changed one bit since 2020 and Megxit. It’s shocking and quite sad.’ It echoes what Harry said in an interview in 2023 when he said: ‘What I’d really like is some accountability. And an apology to my wife.’

The source added: ‘He certainly won’t be issuing a public apology for his actions and he’s whipped himself up all over again and Diana’s legacy is a factor in this.’

This is followed by news about The Diana Award. It looks like TW will be attending with Harry, as William has decided neither to go nor to send a video.

A spokesman for the charity said: ‘The Diana Award is at the early stages of considering how it may mark the 30th anniversary of Princess Diana’s death next year.

‘No plans have been agreed, no event has been confirmed, and no decisions have been made regarding attendance or participation.’

CG’s sources are... well, not friends, but rather acquaintances of Harry—because Harry doesn’t have "friends," only people he knows and wants to exploit. There is no doubt about that; she still moves in the same circles, so Harry can hardly claim this isn't true.

And we know it is: Harry is angry, especially with William. Neil Sean—who also has good sources—said Harry was furious because William hasn't made the slightest gesture to get to know his nephews and is blocking Harry’s access to the Wales children. Harry aims to cement his own children's status as future royals, but for that to happen, he needs them to have some contact with George, Charlotte, and Louis. The lack of such contact makes that plan impossible.

But amidst all this, there are several daggers being driven into Harry: the realization that the people he knows in the UK feel no genuine sympathy for him. And that is something he brought upon himself. Yet this lack of sympathy goes beyond people simply talking to the *Mail*; there is also no interest in reintegrating Harry into the fold—and even less so for TW. If the Harkles haven't changed, then the reasons for their isolation haven't changed either.

I think this return of Harry’s will be far more catastrophic for him than he anticipated. Seeing that everyone has moved on and is living better without him was already painful enough, but living in the same area and realizing that firsthand will be a hard blow—a well-deserved one.

archive.ph
u/Human-Economics6894 — 2 months ago

You are not responsible for all the doors another person decides to walk through. (Neil Sean's gossips)

And six years later, we’re back to square one: William has to do this, Charles has to do that—William and Charles. Harry is over 40; he’s getting on in years (not mature, just old), yet once again, everything revolves around what William and Charles have to do. It has reached a truly absurd level.

https://preview.redd.it/hl5iy9rdbemh1.png?width=1325&format=png&auto=webp&s=7c6f8fc5d87f0e96f9fbd82933a2ea915fe94550

HARRY CALLS THE PALACE AGAIN & AGAIN - MARKLE CALLS SECURITY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNcvSODH0Pw

Harry—four judges, various ministers in the UK, Canada, and the US, and the police—they’ve all told you: "No, we aren't providing you with security; pay for it yourself." Which part of that is hard for you to understand? But after six years, not only does Harry fail to understand anything, he repeats the same narrative: he is a prince, he is in the line of succession, it is his birthright—and a few days ago, he added "symbol of the Crown." Unbelievable.

Harry won't back down on that; he keeps pushing and pushing and pushing. He shows no remorse for what he has done, nor does he display a shred of feeling regarding what is happening in the UK.

Because Harry should have realized it was a terrible idea—an absolutely terrible idea—to talk about looking for a £12 million house in the Cotswolds... with a pool. A bad idea, a terrible one. July 2026 is shaping up to be the driest July on record in the UK, according to official data, due to successive heatwaves that have transformed traditionally green areas into parched, brown earth.

https://preview.redd.it/4c6heyt2oemh1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=2409bc09a77d1be6e13d20f9ec93fd249c516ec3

https://preview.redd.it/dpx7v2y3qemh1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=442fd10d2a6d1c6b6c05bf2e94f2867e8a4c0966

A two-arched stone bridge, believed to date back to the 19th century, located at the Llwyn-onn Reservoir in the Taf Fawr Valley, Merthyr Tydfil, Wales, was revealed last week due to low water levels. Photo: Matthew Horwood/Getty Images

If Harry had any idea what’s going on in the UK—where the use of garden hoses for watering has been restricted—he wouldn't be doing this. But he doesn't know that; *I* do, and I’m Chilean, yet the Prince of England doesn't! So, the fact that Harry is looking for a house with a pool has gone down really badly.

So, if Harry were to move to the Cotswolds, he wouldn't be well-received at all. And that is what has the government worried now—because they might have been somewhat inclined to provide security for Harry, were it not for the way he runs his mouth.

https://preview.redd.it/oll4fx1ooemh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=24ff114166455a3bcb889752ab7437a31fd69b1b

At the heart of the matter, the government sees that Harry has allowed it to become known he can afford a $14 million home in Montecito and a €6.3 million property in Portugal, and now wants to buy a £12 million house in the Cotswolds. So, he isn't short on funds? That means he can pay for private security.

That’s what Sean was referring to yesterday—that the Harkles ought to pay attention to what’s being published and perhaps issue a warning this time. They’ve done it for things that were actually true; is this true? So, do they have money after all? Then let them pay for their own security.

Especially since security would cost taxpayers more than 4 million pounds—even more so if Claw intends to travel to the USA and back.

That’s why Shabana Mahmood believes the Harkles should have accepted the offer to stay at Buckingham. But no, the Harkles don’t want that; they want Windsor, close to the Waleses. Sean says that if you have nothing and are offered something, it is very ungrateful to demand something more luxurious. But we are talking about the Harkles, aren't we?

That’s not to mention the fact that the Harkles themselves are their own worst enemy. Take what happened with MasterChef—Harry’s phone call—and the major security breach. Harry is supposed to be careful about who calls him... yet he ended up taking a call from someone who had Claw’s phone in hand. It was a total mess when viewed objectively, even if it was a pre-arranged call; Sean has already revealed that Harry didn't want to do it. The most absurd part of it all is that the Harkles wanted to use that call so Claw could say, "Oh, a security breach"... That didn't happen, but it remains absurd; the fact is, it was obviously a staged call—and even more so, the Harkles themselves were the ones who caused the problem. When things are done poorly, they are done very poorly.

And what’s even more absurd is that, after more than eight years, Harry—the real Harry—actually believes Claw gave up a lot for him. He genuinely believes she had a great career as an actress, that she had plenty of offers...

https://preview.redd.it/byy34hl2cemh1.png?width=220&format=png&auto=webp&s=a08907a8f8687ec1a9a062baeda2ba72000f1b4d

Yes, that's how it is.

I didn't watch *Suits*, and even I knew she was an extra who was already on her way out when she got lucky enough to meet Harry. How did Harry not do a background check on that woman? No, he didn't; he just took off with her to Africa—to the middle of nowhere—right after meeting her. Every time I read what Harry told Nicklin in court, I couldn't get the thought out of my head that he had run off to Africa with a total stranger. Harry was such a nightmare for the police! That’s why they don’t want to protect him now, even if they were forced to.

On the other hand, Claw genuinely believed Harry had more money and power than he actually did. He allowed himself to be deceived by a woman who gave him everything he wanted. She allowed herself to be deceived by the tabloids.

And neither of them realized—not even now—a fundamental truth: they both believed that possessing titles of nobility meant they could do whatever they pleased. The reality is that without a connection to the royal family, those titles are worthless.

They can't claim they didn't know this, because they’ve been warned about it for years. The fact that they’ve suddenly gone, "Oh, we’ve woken up to that fact," just shows what fools they are.

And it’s not as if Harry and Claw weren’t warned that the worst thing they could do was turn against the press. Let’s be realistic: the traditional British press uses the Harkles just as it uses Brooklyn Beckham or, currently, Fergie. But picking a fight the way the Harkles did... that was a bad idea.

Sean has never understood the way Claw sells her "As Ever" products. The videos and promotion are poor, but the strangest part of it all is that, despite having 4 million followers, sales don't reflect that. Perhaps it’s because Claw is unable to connect with them—or even empathize with them—and because she knows she is actually widely disliked.

https://preview.redd.it/snxvj0o3semh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=08c60da7490436bdb510211e1b91e0c0d2a4cb38

It's always a pleasure to see Fabio Lanzoni 😍😍😍, best actor/model and not the other way around 🤭🤭🤭

Claw believes the press is to blame for everything—that the media painted a negative picture of her. Harry feels the same way. Consequently, they have been advised to have lunch with two or three newspaper or media editors who are more sympathetic to them, in order to figure out how to steer their public image in the right direction. Holly Willoughby did something like that before launching her YouTube channel. Those outlets gave her show a glowing review... but the public felt otherwise.

Harry is completely against doing this. Harry changing his mind in 3, 2, 1... Because his team has already said that, whatever they might believe, the fact is the Harkles don't control the narrative. And they need to give this a try. But Sean says he doesn't think Claw and Harry will do it; they always think they're superior to everyone else.

That is why the general sentiment in the UK is one of gloating over what the Harkles are going through; many people believe they returned because they failed at everything. Sean already pointed this out in a past video: once a celebrity reveals their true colors, it is hard for people to change their minds.

Many people are convinced that Harry returned to the UK simply because he had nothing to do in California. And the funny thing is, Harry is letting it be known that he won't actually be doing anything in the UK—just being a full-time dad. What are the Harkles going to live on? Supposedly, on "As Ever."

According to Sean, Harry doesn't want to abandon Archewell (though I can't recall if it was Tom Sykes who said Harry cut ties with BetterUp a year ago, or the other way around). But to get it up and running again, he needs to resolve the Sentebale matter—which is going to get ugly, very ugly. It seems Harry is fighting to reach a settlement and wrap things up before everything leaks. Neither he nor his team wants this to drag on, especially after what happened with the *Daily Mail*.

Sean says the £9.5 million payment was indeed made because the insurance policy kicked in. But that doesn't change the fact that paying that amount to the *Mail* must have been painful for Harry.

Claw, on the other hand, believes in projecting the image that everything is fine. That explains the motorcade upon their arrival at the airport and the absurdity of not denying reports that they are looking for a massive, nine-bedroom, £12 million mansion in the Cotswolds. It is all a ploy to distract attention from the fact that their marriage is in deep crisis.

Harry doesn't want to be a celebrity—he is one, certainly, but he doesn't *want* to be. Consequently, he hopes to keep a relatively low profile for the time being. Claw would sooner iron her own clothes than let that happen; she is entirely focused on winning an Daytime Emmy, landing more commercial deals in the US, and never setting foot in the UK again. There is, therefore, a vast divide between them.

But Sean has been quite firm on this point: no, there will be no divorce. Claw isn't going to let go of Harry, so in a way, she is giving him a bit of space—just enough for him to end up feeling frustrated back in the UK. Claw doesn't think this is going to work out. She doesn't want to let him go.

Now Harry needs to find some charity work to do, and Claw needs to get her business off the ground.

This is based on a six-month plan. Sean’s account relies on what an excellent source told him regarding what the King knew about the matter. It turns out that in July, Harry did mention the move to the King—though not that it was happening the following week, but rather, "We’re thinking of splitting our time: six months here and six months in the US." It was just a casual remark. They didn't say anything to the King about schools. That is why the King was genuinely surprised when Harry actually moved.

Could things look any worse?

https://preview.redd.it/h1rp8qdwpemh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=69beddc7e05d936043ca3f57ee5528f979ec25cb

These past few days must have been exhausting for the British Royal Family, and to top it all off, Fergie is back, announcing that she is weighing offers for documentaries, books, and the like. The deals will come to her.

The funny thing is that one of those offers came from Newsnight.

https://preview.redd.it/i4sdbmiysemh1.png?width=480&format=png&auto=webp&s=a0d92c0484ad07c70e8b0e116ca89e63f8f88865

Exactly—the same program where Andrew spoke. Now they wanted to ask Fergie very similar questions. Fergie didn't accept the offer.

For now, Fergie hasn't caused any further stir—something the BRF is very grateful for. The person who is anything but grateful is the poor official tasked with answering Harry's calls.

https://preview.redd.it/qzk6g4zytemh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=1fbbbbdee0a0c4e178e038cba2b10760bce41538

Harry hasn't stopped calling every single day. Every one. He’s insufferable. And here’s the funny part: Sean says that on Friday, August 28th, around noon—Sean says 12:04—he was absolutely desperate to get in touch with the King.

It’s super specific about the day and time, isn't it? This doesn't sound made up; it sounds like a leak, because the reason for Harry's call was that he wanted the King to grant them another meeting with the children before they started school.

Harry and Claw wanted to fuel the idea that there really is a reconciliation. Since things went so well for them in July, there are so many photos of it.

https://preview.redd.it/2g50uje1vemh1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=35a29bf94ddb32a542f4887ce97ed1f95a86516c

The Harkles wanted to go to Balmoral for tea this weekend. By Saturday, August 29, it hadn't happened.

William hasn't changed his stance on this. And Sean agrees that William shouldn't give in to the circus.

Sean notes that Kate was particularly saddened by the death of Dolly Parton, as she had wanted to meet her when Dolly was in London a few years ago—in 2023. Dolly wasn't there for a major concert appearance, but rather in her capacity as a sincere philanthropist, donating books; she has given away more than 300 million books to children through her Imagination Library. She was in the UK for that purpose when Kate found out and invited her to Windsor for tea. However, Dolly couldn't accept the invitation because she was only there for a single day—specifically to donate books. Dolly thought she would have another chance to have tea. That chance never came.

https://preview.redd.it/4n97zhgzgemh1.png?width=410&format=png&auto=webp&s=f34b31804b1ba673839225ddb9dfda97e57e387d

MARKLE , THE PHONE CALL & THIS ERUPTION FROM HARRY LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnKCXfmrC9M

The Harkles announced when and where they would be arriving, putting on a whole show.

Sean believes that the Harkles live and breathe publicity. And the press played right into their hands, as news of the King's tour—which was far more important—was overshadowed by the Harkles.

But that doesn't change the fact that the Harkles have serious problems—especially because of "Claw." What does she believe in? What are her values? Harry at least has something; she only believes that if there’s a camera, you have to smile.

Like in this interview, where Harry actually seemed more genuinely interested in the topic of social media. Claw didn't; she was only interested in talking about herself, just herself.

https://preview.redd.it/44sflqjowemh1.png?width=980&format=png&auto=webp&s=97f1f6e2cacae5804a025c6d0aa592b484595a17

The Harkles put out a ridiculous statement this week regarding the Meta issue. Sean says the Harkles are capable of generating headlines, not money.

According to a source, Harry wants to pursue the matter against Meta.

Why, do they have something else to say?

No, not really. The problem is that Harry wanted a big sweeping gesture regarding this particular headline.

https://preview.redd.it/xgx2o3ba0fmh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=de5f3eaa1332dcf92f939c1e4f525694557fbcea

Now for the scoop: Harry’s idea was for Claw to make a big announcement stating that she was leaving Instagram.

https://preview.redd.it/7yqatslj0fmh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=91efebe09ab66f05fb7e28235d9e4ec6406dca77

That’s not a bad idea; it would be a coherent one. But is Claw coherent?

In other words, she demands that children not be monetized on social media—other people's children, not her own. Claw told Harry she wasn't going to close her Instagram because it’s a business account, not a personal one, and it exists to build awareness for her brand.

https://preview.redd.it/zf9bmvi41fmh1.png?width=539&format=png&auto=webp&s=a062deeb95e0b6267537995056b65d8173f72a6f

Furthermore, according to this source—who apparently won't be working with the Harkles anymore—Claw used a surefire argument.

Yes, crying again.

Harry gives in because he can't bear to see her cry.

But the point remains exactly the same: Claw believes in nothing, and Harry always gives in.

MARKLE’S PAL SET TO SCOOP MEGA DEAL & HERE IN THE UK - FUMING

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cG_-Hgp8uxk

I didn't remember where the image of Harry was from.

https://preview.redd.it/2p4czj7j1fmh1.png?width=620&format=png&auto=webp&s=0bb1a06ef5ce9c638f60e5630dae24afcd3aff1a

I just remembered.

https://preview.redd.it/ee8tpfbr1fmh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=0122db04cf069e8b4651d2317206e780638a8e91

That image really made me laugh—I think it was in *The Sun*. That’s like pouring tons of salt into a wide-open wound 🤭🤭🤭.

Yes, Fergie—who had been out of the public eye—is returning to the UK. And she announced it.

Sean had already mentioned that Fergie has been working with a team for some time to improve her image. She is now receiving offers, after doors had closed on her due to the Epstein scandal.

The thing is, *Loose Women* is the show Fergie was associated with until last year.

And since it’s an ITV show, it is undergoing drastic budget cuts—and *Loose Women* hasn't been spared. So, the show's panel is being revamped, and Emma Grede is set to join.

https://preview.redd.it/94ef1r8f3fmh1.png?width=770&format=png&auto=webp&s=f09b033ec472e4ad07e25c462586cddff7db0bf4

ITV believes that Emma—along with singer Anastacia—could be the person to revitalize *Loose Women*.

https://preview.redd.it/q0pihk6q3fmh1.png?width=250&format=png&auto=webp&s=584a24159e06a1dd0b026508f4bbaa7f901d6929

And, of course, the idea behind it all is that Emma might eventually bring Claw onto the panel.

What is happening with *Loose Women* isn't sitting well at ITV, because Emma doesn't come cheap—and aren't there supposed to be cutbacks? So, there is a bit of an internal turf war going on, not helped at all by the fact that ITV also intends to help polish Claw's image.

WILLIAM & THE KING SHOULD INDEED BE WORRIED ABOUT THIS LATEST DEVELOPMENT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiCXdLaSiaA

Claw and Harry are very quick to make friends—not necessarily to keep them, but certainly to make them. This is especially true of Claw; she is incredibly charming when meeting someone for the first time, particularly if that person holds some measure of power. She loves listening to someone talk—or rather, as Sean puts it, that’s a trick that works on men, not women.

And the big problem with that is that Harry and Claw never bother to find out who they are meeting with, as long as the person has money. That’s how Harry ended up at Tyler Perry’s house without knowing who he was—just one in a succession of people who have passed through the Harkles' lives without anyone really taking the trouble to look into who they actually are. Some security that is!

That is what greatly worries William and the King—the kind of associations the Harkles have.

It is like seeing the Yorks and the Dukes of Windsor all over again.

https://preview.redd.it/iio28cye6fmh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=c35d41fb5a333d52d4d9fa6fe70e7c4e268dca34

Once again, those strange and highly ill-advised connections. Because yes, there is a benefactor supporting the Harkles. It is by no means confirmed that it is Ian Wace. Sean did say, however, that Claw had been advised to get in touch with him.

William fears that, given that Harry isn't working and Claw isn't exactly a success, they are associating with unsavory people—raising the risk of another "Epstein 2.0" scandal that could end up tarnishing the British Royal Family, simply because Harry is the King's son.

Sean says that, for now, all he can say is that there will be an injection of funds for As Ever. It’s not the end of the road for that brand yet.

That will give Harry free time to... do nothing. Because right now, he isn't thinking about anything other than being a problem for the BRF.

So the British Royal Family has to make decisions regarding Harry, knowing that none of them will be to his liking—meaning this will just go on and on...

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 2 months ago

I'm every nightmare you've ever had. I'm your worst dream come true. I'm everything you ever were afraid of. (Pennywise, Neil Sean's gossip)

https://preview.redd.it/fs120u4kutlh1.png?width=701&format=png&auto=webp&s=f01a4c504e89f227c3684a1716cb3b32b320eaed

I watched the *It* miniseries before reading the book because I didn't understand why some people claimed it had given them coulrophobia. After watching the miniseries, I understood why. Something very strange happened to me: when Georgie looks at Pennywise in the storm drain, my reaction was, "Oh, a clown!" It took me a few seconds to connect the fact that it was a clown in a storm drain, because Tim Curry’s Pennywise looked just like the clowns I used to see at the circus when my parents took me as a child. Even when the incident with Georgie happened, I didn't quite process it, I mean, what did the clown actually do? I swear I didn't understand; the first time around, I thought I had misunderstood what I was seeing.

For me, the terrifying thing about Curry’s Pennywise was that he initially evoked a sense of fondness—since he was associated with positive childhood memories—yet there was this underlying feeling that something was "off." By the time the miniseries ended, I hadn't developed full-blown coulrophobia, but I no longer felt comfortable around clowns. I mean, even Ronald McDonald made me tense.

https://preview.redd.it/4v52dtw9zslh1.png?width=449&format=png&auto=webp&s=544532ac0089a2a14dc79d365864a55147e60aca

Apologies for the long-winded introduction—I’m channeling Neil Sean here 🤭🤭🤭—but the thing is, Tim Curry was one of my favorite actors because of his tremendous versatility. Drama, comedy, horror, theater, musicals... whatever role he took on, he nailed it. So, his passing really hurts; we’ve lost someone of immense talent, something we’re in short supply of these days.

https://preview.redd.it/f68vwnbx0tlh1.png?width=283&format=png&auto=webp&s=fdfeb37ca41d43dc3ee3b14c0089f79ff99a4971

My favorite Curry is the one who plays Wadsworth. Clue is one of those movies I watch many times a year—I love it!

FINALLY THIS STAR PUTS THE BOOT INTO MARKLE & MORE UK RETURN LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMHAfQz4V-g

William was so happy having that toxic person thousands of miles away... and then that toxic person had to come back to the UK, along with the toxic partner.

https://preview.redd.it/1fr3ue6hyslh1.png?width=590&format=png&auto=webp&s=0d082333d599b520dfcf57b4ae0b52f3c552027f

Pennywise has returned to the town.

But unlike Curry—who made headlines because so many of us feel the pain of his loss and gratitude for his good work—the Harkles only generate negative headlines.

The funny thing is, others are reaping the benefits.

Guy Ritchie’s series *The Gentlemen*—which was flying a bit under the radar due to the sheer volume of shows out there—got a massive boost thanks to Claw’s silly claim that she was slated to appear in a third season... a season that hadn't even been greenlit yet. But now, thanks to the surge in viewership, that season is actually happening—only Claw won't be playing the "sexy" woman she was supposedly cast to be... stop laughing already!!!! Yes, seriously, that was supposed to be her role... okay, fine, go ahead and laugh—I’m laughing too 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Now it’s come out that Maya Jama has been hired for the third season. It doesn't matter if you don't know who she is; she's clearly a sexy woman.

https://preview.redd.it/npziz0x93tlh1.png?width=980&format=png&auto=webp&s=5e3e04b2697066f6c56900bab4f37af48518f7ca

Guy is going to capitalize on the speculation about whether Claw will appear in the third season—since it would be idiotic not to—so he’s going to play the "oh, yeah, maybe, let me think about it" game in public.

But that’s not going to happen, because someone stepped in to stir up a little trouble.

https://preview.redd.it/8qwbfrhl5tlh1.png?width=979&format=png&auto=webp&s=5fb08df4ccbe6a05836f0694d461c0299899c23b

Sir David Beckham.

He is friends with Guy Ritchie. Even working with him on the King Arthur movie.

https://preview.redd.it/4sy4cgxt5tlh1.png?width=554&format=png&auto=webp&s=531e4ad036b19458fa963864f70c9ea0267c5ade

According to Sean, it seems that after the Claw mess, David told Guy, "No, not that one. Don't you dare."

David is adopting William's strategy: cutting ties with anyone not on his side. And Guy isn't an idiot, what matters more, Claw or David? David, definitely David.

And for the record: Guy is friends with William and Kate; in fact, he was invited to their 2011 wedding. Who is more important—them or the Harkles? I mean, imagine Guy saying, "Oh, it's so hard to choose between the Harkles and the Beckhams-Wales"... No, that only happens in the Harkles' minds.

Okay, Pennywise arrived in the city with the person who carries his bag and the aliens. They arrived in a private plane a Birmingham Airport.

Sean says they ended up there because the journey between Birmingham Airport (BHX) and Northamptonshire takes about 50 to 60 minutes by train, car, or bus.

https://preview.redd.it/yy8o73pg6tlh1.png?width=2000&format=png&auto=webp&s=89c9f94256a9d75d1f82ac2d5a9f9b8ab9e16662

Northamptonshire? But that’s not the Cotswolds. No. But Sean says that’s the area where the Harkles are staying now—not the Cotswolds, but Northamptonshire. And that’s all he’ll say for legal reasons.

Presumably, they’ll look for a home in the Cotswolds later on.

https://preview.redd.it/o0kcd2fr9tlh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=2acbaae9403b8cf04587aece01c93e0aacd81469

Everything about "Eggxit" is strange (yes, the whole affair has already been dubbed that, following the abandonment of the chickens). 🐔🐔🐔

Because it was a private jet, the press only found out because the Harkles tipped them off. How lovely, they never change their concept of privacy. 🤭🤭

The private plane of "a good friend".

But now the Harkles want to cash in on the first photo of themselves in the UK. So, they’ll strike a deal with a paparazzo to give them the "exclusive," which will then be sold to a newspaper... although I think that’s what Sean would do. The Harkles aren't that shrewd.

MARKLE SURE IS NO BRAINS ON THIS SHAMBLES - LATEST NEWS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AMGw4B5Kcc

Right now, it is becoming increasingly difficult for television—and even streaming services—to produce high-quality series.

There are series galore, but high-quality ones? Few and far between.

That is why Sean cannot fathom how Claw squandered such a massive opportunity given to her by Netflix.

Sean has said it before: there are no limits to Claw's stupidity.

The funny thing is that Claw keeps harping on about that cooking nonsense, even though the trend has already passed—especially when it involves rich people cooking. Unless you're Paris Hilton—who laughs at herself—the rest of us are looking for a show that helps us prepare meals on a limited budget. Rising cost of living, after all.

https://preview.redd.it/2h0b04fmhtlh1.png?width=557&format=png&auto=webp&s=011ee2a2ee9336cba480a3525383f397bef56049

Claw lives in a fantasy world where she’ll always have millions as long as she stays married to Harry. Or unless she lands another sucker. I don't think that's going to happen anymore, though.

The Harkles have returned to the UK, and in the absence of fanfare, they announced their return themselves.

For today, the Coldstream Guards were far more occupied paying an emotional tribute to Dolly Parton in the vicinity of Buckingham Palace.

https://preview.redd.it/r315tunpitlh1.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=f28646acabdaa126c84d823073ab8f245b473a28

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/q2pInVla26w

Honestly, it was really lovely and very professional—they must have rehearsed it at night.

Martha, on the other hand, now has the opportunity to shine on Netflix. Once again—since she already had that chance with *Martha* in 2024, where she recounted her rise, fall, and resurrection (the kind of story Netflix loves)

https://preview.redd.it/ydhrwzxfjtlh1.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=38a293779797f1e4d60c37ea6c077c51bdf8a537

She is returning to Netflix with *Martha Cooks*. Available starting August 25, 2026, the show features her demonstrating recipes and culinary techniques, filmed at her farm in Bedford.

https://preview.redd.it/b9o19wewjtlh1.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=5304c8772e243df1b72f848e1b5a93739a193375

The thing is, Martha DOES KNOW HOW TO COOK!!!

Ah, Claw in action!!!! 😄😄😄😄

https://preview.redd.it/1xz9a6x6ktlh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=f9841e56940c59d1693952b7cb02cc762225e3b2

Poor knife, poor onion. 😭😭

Martha will do everything Netflix told Claw to do: cook, promote, and do it all from her home.

So when Martha succeeds, it will be a blow to Claw, because Martha will be succeeding at the very thing Claw thought she could do better. Yet Martha survived a major scandal—not just staying afloat but shining again—while acting like just as arrogant an idiot as Claw. Martha is a truly shrewd woman. It will become evident that her success stems precisely from *not* being Claw. That will further bury Claw—and any chance of Netflix reconsidering its stance.

HARRY’S SECRET & DRAMATIC CHANGE OVER THIS WAS INSPIRED BY WHO & WHAT NEXT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suYLknGNBWU

News broke a few days ago that Charles Spencer’s book about Diana, *Swan Songs*, is about to hit the shelves.

Charles wasn't exactly thrilled by the Harkles' visit. But Harry is Diana’s son... and so is William. Sean always remarks on how odd it is that people forget William was Diana’s son, too.

Harry doesn’t see it that way. He feels like Diana’s only son, which is why he wants to prove it by reviving the idea of ​​making a documentary about her—an idea he’s revisiting after seeing the interest generated by Charles Spencer’s book.

https://preview.redd.it/8fnfzm8botlh1.png?width=1273&format=png&auto=webp&s=45b09c9a0cef041bf992dd7bec2e75a1892642b5

But Sean points out—and I think he’s right—that the interest lies in the fact that Charles Spencer was actually present at many events in Diana’s life. He was there, and he remembers them. Whether his memory is accurate or not is another matter. But Harry... what does Harry remember? He might recall something, but not enough for a documentary. So we’re back to the main point: the person Harry needs is William. And William isn’t going to open his mouth. In fact, he has already forbidden the use of photos featuring himself.

Harry faces the problem that the people who knew Diana either do not want to speak with him or are dead. And those who *do* want to are lesser figures.

Sean suggests there was another path open to Harry: working further on the books contracted with Penguin, but doing so in a more positive way—sharing more anecdotes about his grandparents or cousins, things like that. But no; Harry chose the path of playing the victim and complaining. And of lies.

Sean says he doesn't know if Charles Spencer showed the book draft to William and Harry first. Sean says Charles has a good heart... I doubt it; he has too many conflicts with his nephews to believe that. But he wouldn't want to get into trouble by offending them... I do believe that part; I don't think Charles Spencer would want to offend William.

That said, it seems Harry intends—if the documentary doesn't work out—to speak for a book about "his" version of his mom...

...

...

...

Oh, no! No, no, no, no. Don't count on me to read that. No. I have nightmares about Freud because of Harry's Oedipus complex. No.

https://preview.redd.it/nhlxp1zhotlh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=ba1fe53ce400338640248bc2f049db8578323414

I do want to read Charles Spencer's book. But if one by Harry were to come out...I still haven't recovered from the trauma of Spare. No, don't count on me to read that

https://preview.redd.it/t0oft11qotlh1.png?width=4000&format=png&auto=webp&s=ef006b9c52f7aa38bf91641f497e07ffba652863

HERE’S THE DEAL..THE BEGINNING OF THE END …LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJzJUcq689U

🎼Is this the end of the beginning?
Or the beginning of the end?
Losing control or are you winning?
Is your life real or just pretend?🎼

https://preview.redd.it/kia7da7kptlh1.png?width=399&format=png&auto=webp&s=455d94f5caa0fd40475743fb4059461c8621cb35

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0W91FrTlYk&list=RDo0W91FrTlYk&start_radio=1

One Tim Curry, one Dolly, one Ozzy

Sean says that if this is the beginning of the end, it wouldn't be a problem for Claw—it would be the second time she’s ditched a husband. But for Harry, it would be the first time he’s been the husband who got ditched.

The Harkles have sold the "great love story" narrative, including "Claw's" infamous claim that she and Harry had actually married three days earlier and that the official ceremony was just for show.

I didn't know—and I think this is the first time Sean has mentioned it—that the Queen apologized to the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, about that. The Queen was far too tolerant of those two cockroaches.

The Harkles lie, and lie, and lie, and lie. The problem is that the lies come to light. They don't see it that way; they think things get forgotten. No, Harkles—things don't get forgotten.

But the fact is, if the Harkles don't have drama, they create it.

Especially with the staff.

Sean says that, in general, members of the BRF treat their staff with great respect because they view them as an extension of themselves. As William told Claw: "They help us; they aren't servants." Claw, as we already know, is a witch in high heels.

When William confronted Claw about how she treated the staff, she got angry because he pointed his finger in her face... she did not change her attitude toward the staff.

Sean says Claw has made almost all of Diana's plays. Except one.

https://preview.redd.it/c8poalgistlh1.png?width=736&format=png&auto=webp&s=f0a15b1cc9f2f1425bce124a1fbc15d24ca5bc19

Crying in public

Not crying in front of a camera, Claw has done that, pretending to cry, just like Diana did. But in public, Claw always keeps that crazy smile on her face, because she believes that makes people see her as strong.

But the fact is that this is going to change in the coming months, because there are indeed serious problems in that marriage. It starts with the fact that she gets very excited about something at first, only to abandon it later. Harry, on the other hand, takes a long time to get excited about anything, so he struggles to keep up with her pace. That causes frustration for Harry.

There are money issues, but in that couple, only Claw really knows anything about finances. Sean says he can't even find a way to explain that Harry knows absolutely nothing about money.

An added complication is that Harry was desperate to return to the UK; he was eager to do so. It’s a bit absurd, because it’s as if Harry doesn’t grasp that *he* was the one who walked away—yet he views himself as having been exiled.

Harry and Claw spin the story that they came back for the sake of the children and their education. That’s not true. Sean says that while the visa issue played a part in the return, the bottom line is that Harry got a taste of Claw’s lifestyle and didn’t like it, and she got a taste of Harry’s and didn’t like it either.

So now they find themselves at odds. And Sean—ever the gentleman—says it all comes down to whether money and power will keep Claw with Harry. A polite way of talking about a gold digger 🤭🤭🤭

https://preview.redd.it/qcnrbjgrutlh1.jpg?width=399&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e1c30a3b2b658d64415ed2d1e1656bc3afdde3c4

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 2 months ago

I’m not offended by all the dumb blonde jokes because I know I’m not dumb – and I’m not blonde either. (Dolly Parton, Neil Sean's gossip)

https://preview.redd.it/guhsj7qfrllh1.png?width=746&format=png&auto=webp&s=94d177ec899f7129cd58100d05235a0d4e8fb335

First Bonnie Tyler, now Dolly.

I suppose the Harkles will say something, because they always jump on any moderately popular bandwagon. But Harry—Harry especially—won't understand at all why so many people are mourning Dolly's death. Perhaps because he doesn't understand the way Dolly lived.

“You have to work at being happy. Some people work at being miserable. If I wake up in the morning and don’t feel great or things are not great, I try to think about what I can do to make things work better, rather than just falling into that deep hole, because then you just go deeper and deeper.”

Movies, songs, her philanthropy... Dolly truly made history. But this is how I’ll remember her. Dolly to the very end.

https://preview.redd.it/tgjn841ntllh1.png?width=736&format=png&auto=webp&s=4f0428c45e712d144378b46d3748643beb11652d

MARKLE, MARTHA THE KING & WHO IS CONFUSED NOW ABOUT UK RETURN CHAT?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3v5Jkp0OzUg

Here is another example of someone who carved out her own place in history:

Martha Stewart.

Meanwhile, Harry will go down in history as the King's scatterbrained second son. But at least his name will appear in a book somewhere, whereas Claw is, right now, merely "Harry's wife."

A lying and insolent wife. What an insult to a woman who actually has millions of dollars.

For Claw to say that Martha was confused was extremely rude. And another one of her lies.

Ah, right—she didn't say that; an assistant did. Claw never says anything. Claw always finds ways to dodge the blame.

https://preview.redd.it/yk5zg2s86mlh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=973c2af59b42dfdb20183ecc0b613e2553cd1f74

But—as is now known to many who didn't realize it before—Sean knows a lot of people. A huge number. The other day, he spoke about his connection to Omar Sharif. Now, he had anecdotes about Dolly. So, Sean did know someone who was at that event—in fact, he had already mentioned knowing two people there.

According to that source, Claw did indeed speak about the King and that visit—about how well it went—and it seems that at that event, according to the same source, Claw also spoke about the move.

Sean isn't going to reveal who the source is, but it wasn't a waiter; it was one of the guests—someone who was sitting at that table. Why doesn't Sean want to give any hints about their identity? Because Sean has already stated that Hollywood wants nothing to do with two people as toxic as the Harkles; they believe that getting involved in their drama means catching that toxicity. And yes, that is true.

https://preview.redd.it/uselk5ul6mlh1.png?width=427&format=png&auto=webp&s=c167fe554ad198ea9dfa0b0daac765d669fd867d

Sean doesn't believe the King was in the dark about it, though the situation is more complex than that. What is a fact, however, is that Harry had long wanted his children to be educated in the UK. He seems to believe this secures their status as royals—or at least Archie's. And Sean isn't lying; he had been sharing this kind of gossip for quite some time—in fact, Harry really wanted his son to attend Eton. It will depend on what happens next and, of course, whether Harry still has the money to afford that school.

Sean’s source says that the matter didn’t come to light because the people at the event were surprised by Claw’s "vivacity" while speaking—it was a very open conversation, even though she had only been asked, "So, how was your vacation?" According to the source, there was suspicion regarding what Claw was doing; knowing it had been a private visit, they didn't want to put themselves in the line of fire. They suspected that Claw was doing this precisely to accuse someone of being against her.

https://preview.redd.it/4rsnw7hv7mlh1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=323a32fe14c00d5c42e0ac3531ae24564df00866

You might think that sounds like some Sherlock Holmes-style conspiracy theory. But it’s not—and I agree with Sean on this: it’s neither the first nor the millionth time the Harkles have played that game. Especially Claw. I mean, look at how they tried to blame Meredith Maines for the "Photogate" incident with the Kardashians, even though Maines didn't even know what had happened. That’s the Harkles' game of manufacturing controversy.

So, the controversy involving Martha was hypocritical, cruel, and offensive, because Claw did exactly what she was told not to do—since she cannot forgive the King for not releasing the images of the Invisikids. And that is why many in Hollywood are happy to see the Harkles clear off.

MINISTER WARNED & ADVISED THIS ABOUT SUSSEXES DEMANDS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdRReikdCxc

Sean says a video of Harry talking about climate change popped up on his social media. Sean says it doesn't look recent to him, and he doesn't understand why it appeared.

https://preview.redd.it/0pk56inxxllh1.png?width=778&format=png&auto=webp&s=a93e39886eb8f4ea44722f2a553d864573dbd30b

Harry and Claw are returning to the UK and putting together their show. The feeling among many people is that this whole thing is a sham.

The problem for Harry is that this isn't positive—not in his case. Especially when the negative headlines are *very* negative.

Like how Labour MPs want Harry to be provided with taxpayer-funded security.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2026/08/22/badenoch-expects-harry-and-meghan-to-receive-taxpayer-funde/

I think the Labour Party is making a huge mistake if they intend to use Harry as a distraction. It is one thing for many of us to take the time to follow this saga—because, honestly, there isn't much else to watch on TV 🤭🤭—but quite another for people to forget their own real-life problems. And when someone like Dame Emily Thornberry—a prominent Labour MP who chairs the Foreign Affairs Select Committee—declares that “We must remember that [the Duke of Sussex] has contributed to this country through his public service and his heroism. He is the King’s son and has contributed a great deal to our country through public service, which puts him and his family at risk,” it comes across as very off-putting to many people.

Seeing a certain political faction say things like that makes 1) what Richard Eden and Neil Sean said—that Labour wants to use Harry against the monarchy—very credible; if he doesn't realize that and understand that his own head will roll too, then he is a complete idiot; and 2) it serves as a distraction.

The terrible thing about this is completely ignoring British public opinion and the fact that Harry and Claw offended the British people. It is as if a certain political faction genuinely believes the whole affair is just a squabble between brothers. Meanwhile, the Labour Party forgets that Harry owes the public purse at least a couple of million pounds. After all, did Harry actually pay up after losing his security case?

For the government, Harry is a problem. They might be able to ignore what the public thinks about "Harry and Meghan," but they cannot ignore what four judges have said. I mean, just imagine the government providing 24/7 security after nearly five years of legal battles.

Harry believes that if he returns to the UK, the obstacle preventing him from receiving taxpayer-funded security will be removed; once that is secured, he could undertake the same journey he made in 2020—going to Canada (a Commonwealth nation) and then to the US—while retaining that security. Harry neither knows nor cares about the IPP issue; he simply wants to cement his status as the "King's son"—a narrative that is gaining traction within a certain segment of the Labour Party.

Shabana Mahmood climbed the political ladder, and she, as Sean recounted, was very proud to have a personal letter from Harry; she still has it framed in her office. She was prepared to provide Harry with security. Sean said that the rebellion against this came from within the officials themselves and the police.

However, Shabana Mahmood sees herself as a future Prime Minister, so she has been advised by her team that if she does communicate with Harry, she should keep it vague and imprecise. She has also been told to avoid any private meetings with Harry—especially in her office—because he would likely tip off the paparazzi, and a photo of him arriving at the Home Office would send a very bad signal.

https://preview.redd.it/o4xs61rb8mlh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=5e4d8a4255322651674bcf5df294179ebbda0e7d

Behind the scenes, things are difficult because Harry isn't backing down, and Mahmood fears that if anything were to happen to Harry—or anyone else in the Sussex family—it would create another problem for the government.

But that is just one aspect of the controversy. After all, if Harry feels such a strong need for that security—enough to keep pushing the issue the way he does—then why did he move to the UK? It seems stupid to move to such an unsafe place, doesn't it?

Sean is adamant that Harry has the money to pay for that security. The problem isn't how much money Harry has right now; the problem is that no new money is coming in. He doesn't have the funds to replenish what he has spent.

SECRETS THE SUSSEXES ARE HIDING AHEAD OF UK RETURN…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMfUYusbuik

Some people claim that Netflix and Guy Ritchie used the Harkles to promote the series *The Gentlemen*. No, that wasn't the case. The Harkles themselves floated that nonsense, likely because they had run into Guy at some event a couple of years back. But it wasn't an idea that came from Netflix or Guy. Did they capitalize on it? It would have been idiotic not to. But they didn't instigate it, because Netflix has no desire to maintain contact with those toxic individuals.

It was embarrassing that *The Hollywood Reporter* or *Deadline* bought into that story. Especially since they know it’s a lie that Claw was an actress or that she walked away from a successful career; only Harry believes that.

https://preview.redd.it/b4lacgxh6mlh1.png?width=384&format=png&auto=webp&s=609c839a1db1dd0cd7f1bb1d65b56b198cb0aca2

The person who actually faced a negative issue was Geri Halliwell.

https://preview.redd.it/6qeyeytg8mlh1.png?width=401&format=png&auto=webp&s=7793012357c0859bbb3f8bed163d69cb86324f48

The story went that the Harkles had lunched with her and her husband and that the couple was "advising" them on their return to the UK. False. Geri and her husband quickly got their lawyers involved, and the *Daily Mail*—where the story first appeared—retracted it. No, that never happened.

Like Cameron Diaz never actually had lunch with the Harkles. They ran into each other at the entrance of a restaurant, but Cameron didn't even recognize them.

https://preview.redd.it/eux3hcx04mlh1.png?width=683&format=png&auto=webp&s=ba8b78924c3df0b949a400b137f171128e7d3436

Why did Geri put a stop to this?

For a simple reason: Victoria Beckham. Geri is friends with her and David. There is already enough drama with Elton playing both sides—between Brooklyn and the Beckhams—without Geri associating herself with the Harkles. Geri has already dealt with enough toxicity from her husband; the last thing she needs is to get mixed up with the king and queen of toxicity.

But Geri did something very curious: first she—or rather, her legal team—contacted Harry’s team to have them deny the story. But the Harkles didn’t do it. So, they moved on to demanding that the media deny it.

So, Claw doesn't have a good friend in Geri; instead, she has someone who wants to keep their distance from her.

It’s a different story in other cases. In other instances, people actually want the Harkles—or, in this case, Claw—involved. It seems there are negotiations underway for the *Strictly Come Dancing* Christmas special—a one-off show. Claw might like the idea, as it would allow her to do charity work. Sean asks, "Will she do it?" and answers "No," yet rumors are circulating that the show's producers have offered it to her.

Saturday Kitchen is another program interested in Claw. That had already been rumored a while back. This Morning is also negotiating with the Harkles.

Sean isn't saying this will definitely happen; rather, he is citing it as an example of the kind of offers the Harkles are actually receiving. Not major TV series, nor huge paychecks for exclusives—just a simple appearance on a show that needs to boost its ratings. Nothing more.

https://preview.redd.it/vathguyz6mlh1.jpg?width=900&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bab149350b922c7c40558dd7b92a5a0ef2a8f418

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 2 months ago

Why the Cotswolds?

I’m not focusing on the arrogance of Harry and Claw moving to a so-called neighborhood for millionaires.

Rather, I’m referring to the fact that Harry intends to secure his title and those of his children.

So, wouldn't it have been the most sensible thing to go live in Sussex?

I mean, do you want to win people over? Go to Sussex! Aren't you the Duke of Sussex? Don't you want your son to inherit the title?

It crossed my mind yesterday because William actually lived in Wales. He and Kate lived in a country house on the Isle of Anglesey, in northwest Wales, between 2010 and 2013. And William visits Wales regularly. Harry has never spent more than five minutes in Sussex. Right now, it would have been a huge PR win for the Duke of Sussex to go live in Sussex—for his son to get to know the area his father’s title comes from.

But no, the Harkles are going to be in one of the most expensive areas of the UK. A pastry costs between £6 and £12, a pint of beer between £5 and £6.70, a main course at a pub runs from £16 to £25+, and a Sunday roast ranges from £18 to £35. The Harkles are going to live in a millionaire's enclave without owning a home of their own and without any clarity regarding their income... Instead of making a bold move by going to live in Sussex.

Sorry, I know this doesn't add anything to the discussion, but I’m just struck by how snobbish and superficial the Harkles are—and even more so by the fact that there are people who still defend them or think it’s worth bringing them back into the royal fold. They have an obvious way to improve their image... and they don't use it!!!!

It must be terrible for anyone working in marketing to end up with the Harkles as clients.

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 2 months ago