u/Human-Economics6894

Harry, you flew to freedom. You left—don't you see that this return is a loud, public announcement that you failed? (Neil Sean's gossip)

Harry, you flew to freedom. You left—don't you see that this return is a loud, public announcement that you failed? (Neil Sean's gossip)

https://preview.redd.it/0psxuhkc8fkh1.png?width=1038&format=png&auto=webp&s=f8a97ec9c7591a3d944155487ff29a02cfb249f0

BACK , BROKE & BUSTED - MARKLE RETURN LATEST NEWS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLi_3mB4Lt0

Dan Wootton is right: what will happen to the chickens and the bees? How will that all play out?

Also, in today's live video, everyone there was making fun of the fact that famous Americans are returning to the UK and Harry is heading there too.

The fact is, Harry got fed up with the U.S. He got fed up with that world; he got fed up with being bored and doing nothing.

That said, a "very close friend" has offered them a place to stay while they adjust to their new surroundings.

And according to Sean, the decision wasn't made in July, but rather now, in August. It stems from a combination of factors: for starters, Harry can no longer afford the cost of the security he—in a rather unhinged way—believes he needs in the US. So, he thinks that if he moves to the UK, he’ll get that security paid for by taxpayers; he seems to believe the whole issue boils down to the fact that he wasn't living in the UK, so why would he have needed security?

Another point is his loss in the case against the *Daily Mail*. Having to pay up will sting, but what’s really distressing him is his terrible reputation in the UK. He believes he can turn that around if he’s actually there.

https://preview.redd.it/mzfzitht8fkh1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=792e272ef76542537ddf0d4d4e24629de61be892

Another aspect was the fact that Harry wanted Archie to have a British education—which is funny, given that Harry isn't exactly the best advertisement for the British education system. But it always comes back to the point that Harry believes his children must have a guaranteed position as royals. It was always a source of ridicule that he expected this while living in the US. Well, Harry believes that by being in the UK, his children will be able to secure their status as royals. So, Archie will attend a private school. Sean says Archie won't be a boarder because Harry doesn't want that, but he will attend a private school. Which is funny, because I suspect Harry expects the King to pay for it. I don't think that's going to happen.

Why is Claw okay with this? No, she isn't. The way Sean puts it, it sounds like there were major arguments in Montecito because Claw didn't want this, and Harry couldn't bring himself to do it. According to what Sean has been told, Claw has not taken this well at all; in fact, there were fights. But what choice does she have? She’s a nobody in Hollywood; no one invites her to anything. She depends on Harry. And Harry depends on regaining a royal connection.

https://preview.redd.it/w5k5jhq99fkh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=76dfbae26c742c5f29ab162a07c8897a1f4e63df

For now, Claw has at least one connection to Charles Spencer's current wife. But we already know that Claw's friendships last exactly 3, 2, 1... and just like that, the friendship is over. 🤭🤭

It's only a matter of time before Claw makes things worse.😜😜

And it seems the decision really was made in the last few days, and the King found out on Sunday.

The funny thing is that the Harkles sold this story as an exclusive... to People, The Telegraph, The Mirror, The Sun... Dan Wootton and his guests were making fun of that. Because that isn't an exclusive. That’s just the Montecito team peddling a story, as always.

At the heart of the matter, of course, is the King's illness. Harry doesn't want a repeat of what happened with the Queen; he needs to secure something while his father is still alive. That is the source of his desperation.

Now, according to Sean, the Harkles will keep the Montecito house... for the time being. They won't hold onto it in the long run. It seems Harry can no longer afford the mortgage payments on that house. That leaves the Portugal property—if it actually belongs to them—as the only thing they have. And let’s be clear: putting the Montecito house up for sale will be pure comedy, because Claw will want to sell it for $200 million, for example, simply because she lived there. In reality, they’ll be lucky to get five million for it. Other, far superior mansions have had to slash their prices drastically because the economy is in bad shape.

It seems Harry decided to return to the UK because he believes that by living here, he can reconnect—not with William; William made it clear long ago that Harry could be standing two meters away and simply not exist to him. Harry needs to reconnect with his old friends—the successful ones—and get a project off the ground that can lift the "Harkles" out of the ruin they are in. Harry doesn't see Sentebale as a problem at all. He also didn't think he would lose the case against ANL, and he took it for granted that he would have security.

https://preview.redd.it/2ndvoqcd9fkh1.png?width=750&format=png&auto=webp&s=fc351be2eac17d4941169560f9243b3e6be503de

Harry has realized he needs the royal connections he once had, so he intends to re-establish them by living in the UK.

Inside the Palace, the announcement landed like a bombshell—and an unpleasant one at that. Consequently, the Palace is on a war footing to ensure the "Harkles" receive no invitations to any royal residences. Staff and officials haven't forgotten how the Harkles treat personnel. Since the Harkles don't want spies around, they’ll likely take advantage of a "friend" (yet again) and stay there until they find something more permanent... if the plan actually works. In short, Sean says the timeline for this runs from now through December.

The fact is that this announcement is being painted as a "grand homecoming"—with claims that Harry missed his life in the UK, and so on—but the reality is that this flashy, drone-filled spectacle signals that the Californian dream was a resounding failure. This marks the dismantling of that dream and confirms it was a colossal flop.

https://preview.redd.it/bg0d8ijo8fkh1.png?width=399&format=png&auto=webp&s=1e1051f9ac70c53e0ff6aab25690033b46a2780f

In other words, Sean says no—Claw has never wanted to return to the UK. It is simply something she will have to do because she has no other choice. And now, it is Harry who is peddling a fantasy. Harry believes that returning to the UK will mean the end of his problems. He will return to the family fold, and other people will finally take charge of solving his issues... that is what Harry believes. The Montecito team told Sean they believe this will only be the start of more serious problems.

And as you know, this is a developing story; when Sean finds out more, I’ll post it here and we’ll all know more.

I know many people have been weighing in on everything and are furious with Charles because he fueled this by meeting with Harry. But guys, look at the point: they flew off to freedom, happy to no longer have to put up with the British!!!! And now they’re supposedly returning to "their home"? I wouldn't want to be Harry right now; his wife must hate him more than he can imagine, because this is a monumental humiliation.

https://preview.redd.it/sejpxlym9fkh1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=07ceeeb8a8f9e2031c0751342f98635b2e26e3be

I think that if any Brit finds out where the Harkles are, they might show up with a sign reminding them of the look on their faces when they "flew to freedom." It won't be anything like the look on their faces when they travel back.😈😈😈

SUSSEXES PLAN AN AUTUMN OF DISCONTENT FOR WILLS & CATHERINE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5Ft-3fdX3s

SUSSEXES NEXT DEVIOUS SPENCER PLAN EXPOSED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmhQ-cgDkEo

Autumn isn't shaping up well for William.

To start with, there is his uncle Charles Spencer's book about Diana. Sean’s sources at Penguin revealed that they had been asking Charles for years to speak about Diana; he finally decided the time was right, and a massive marketing campaign is planned for the book.

Penguin believes they stand to make a lot of money from that book. And all parties made sure everything was fully tied down—promotional events, book signings, and so on. Everything Harry refused to do, which is why he lost the contract for the remaining three books.

Furthermore, Charles Spencer seems to have an advantage over Harry: what he recounts in that book is backed by evidence. That was something Penguin apparently wanted to ensure.

And Sean says that in his book, Charles Spencer touches upon the part of the story where he refused to take Diana in at Althorp when her life fell apart. And yes, there will also be the matter of the speech he gave at Diana's funeral—the one that upset the Queen so much because it was unfair.

https://preview.redd.it/sxd42a79cfkh1.png?width=463&format=png&auto=webp&s=ad8b075f8daf27b1152c35e8a0d1c18c7f642d81

But Sean already explained yesterday that the book's main focus was that disastrous interview with Bashir.

Sean has never absolved Diana of blame for doing that interview. In fact, in one of these videos, Sean states that Diana was not at all shy; once she grasped the power she wielded as a celebrity, she utilized it. However, during the 1990s, Diana had spiraled into a dangerous state of resentment toward Charles—much of which, as Lady C recounted in her book on Diana (revealing that Diana spoke to her before speaking to Morton), stemmed from the fact that Charles failed to live up to the expectations Diana had for the marriage. In other words, it wasn't about anything Charles had or hadn't actually done, but rather about what Diana believed he should have done.

https://preview.redd.it/0si8vjjshfkh1.png?width=2000&format=png&auto=webp&s=f2a88dce50546f111f2ed139823487fcd486628e

It is important to keep this in mind regarding the Bashir affair, because by around 1995, things between Charles and Diana were improving. They had gone from loathing each other to maintaining a relatively cordial relationship. However, Diana was fixated on her own convictions—something the press was well aware of. Various journalists have recounted this: Diana wanted to do the interview, but many of them were reluctant because they did not view her favorably. Bashir exploited that.

That is why the whole story is so appalling. Diana couldn't verify the facts—after all, who could she turn to? Charles, who was cheating on her with the nanny? The Queen, who had ordered her to be spied on? Sean says the things Bashir told Diana were happening were truly shocking, and she didn't know who to trust because she believed what Bashir said. That is why, when Charles Spencer tried to put a stop to the matter after realizing something was amiss with Bashir's claims, Diana didn't believe him.

That manipulation is well-proven.

https://preview.redd.it/tiuuqatckfkh1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=e697902c116793ed46f5a97625ee971e117dc20e

Mind you, this doesn't absolve Charles of the things he did, either. He should have put a stop to the whole situation much sooner, but he spent more time in his office than worrying about what was happening with Diana—even though he was being warned about the direction things were taking.

William is not at all happy, as he is fed up with his mother's image being exploited. In fact, a documentary featuring previously unheard recordings of Diana is also due out in the coming months. William is—as many here and elsewhere have noted—the only one who has truly respected Diana's memory and the only one who has sought neither to profit nor to benefit from it.

Now, Sean says that the idea of ​​the documentary Harry wants to make hasn't been ruled out yet. But the problem Harry faces—and Sean has said this many times—is that he doesn't remember anything about Diana that is truly significant. It was William who was Diana's confidant; he knows things about her that have never come to light—things even Harry doesn't know. William was Diana's source of support, not Harry.

https://preview.redd.it/6eolx2b8kfkh1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=27bd3339d1c019f042e1461dd0fa7350943d3616

So now, Harry finds that his uncle is going to tell a more "official" version of certain events—a version that excludes him and from which he won't be able to benefit. In other words, he can no longer count on Charles Spencer for that documentary. But Netflix wants William. And William isn't going to lift a finger to help Harry.

Claw and Harry can't be too happy, because there's a war going on in the US to land an exclusive interview—yes, this time it's for real—with Charles Spencer. Sean says it looks like NBC has the best offer. Furthermore, Charles Spencer has long-standing ties to NBC.

William will be keeping a close eye on that.

Claw and Harry see this as an opportunity to spite William. And William must be annoyed, because he had already made arrangements for Harry's return in September... and then Harry dropped a bombshell.

Claw and Harry are now engaged in a war of attrition. They believe that the more they pester William, the sooner he will snap and end up looking like the story's ultimate villain. Harry and Claw haven't given up on wanting to use the Spencer surname, either. So the Harkles will continue to stir up conflict.

And one aspect of this campaign is that Claw and Harry are trying to deepen their relationship with Charles Spencer—and with Charles's current wife, to whom Claw was oh-so-charming and whom she gifted those expired *As Ever* products. Seriously, what kind of cheapness is that? Didn't it occur to Harry to give his uncle a truly fitting wedding gift?

https://preview.redd.it/lrj7gi7llfkh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=37096582703db051a20c9d5a5b9faa3ba377a918

The Harkles are waiting for Charles Spencer's book to come out so they can go back to leaking stories. They’ve already dropped a few, such as the claim that Camilla didn't welcome Claw with open arms. That isn't true; Camilla was courteous to two people who deserve a good slap. Both Camilla and Carole Middleton were extremely kind to Claw when she arrived in the UK; she was the rude one toward them. Now she expects them to be at her beck and call. So Claw and Harry think the time has come to play the "I've got this scoop" game again. That explains a lot about why they’ve returned to the UK; a scoop from Harry is more valuable when it comes from the UK than from Montecito.

Sean says—and let’s make no mistake about it—that it won’t be an easy autumn for William and Kate. But I believe that two people who have overcome far worse things than a couple of annoying imbeciles—and who, as everyone on Dan Wootton’s show noted, are clearly in love and extremely close—are in a much better position than the Harkles, who failed monumentally at everything and are now mired in major internal drama.

MARKLE..SECURITY ..SOMEONE BELIEVED HER..THIS IS THE TRUTH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7srgkiFOAU

The problem with the Harkles' guerrilla campaign is... well, that they are the Harkles. They are two venomous snakes, but ones born without a brain cell to their names. Consequently, the harm they cause rebounds on them twofold.

Claw loves drama... and loves to lie.

Like this.

https://preview.redd.it/cv4vu5nhlfkh1.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=e074a4d3838e67dd85e1b24668208583e9233893

Claw is lying, as always, because he never explained how he did this—or, of course, who he stole the idea from.

https://preview.redd.it/6bzql4qvlfkh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=b5a20cbcbfe4d3e2ef616772a1485e6fc8a28e12

Well, Claw is focused on annoying a lot of people. That’s why she doesn’t comb the little girl’s hair or take good photos of the boy—because she loves it when people comment on those things. Yes, she does that deliberately, because she is such a successful businesswoman that she can devote time to that.

One of the major issues the Harkles faced early this year was what happened in Australia.

They arrived in Oz convinced they were extremely popular.

No, they aren't.

And among the people who are no longer interested in the Harkles is Sofia Levin from *MasterChef Australia*, who is very annoyed with Claw.

https://preview.redd.it/910j4macnfkh1.png?width=388&format=png&auto=webp&s=d30a719c421e8dfd78475f62134c3970ce923e15

Levin pointed out that Claw had been great and all that... but it turned out Claw did nothing to promote her appearance on MasterChef, let alone acknowledge the support she was receiving from her. Levin was also annoyed because the entire episode revolved around the call Harry made.

Levin says they knew nothing about that call—the one where Harry revealed his location, the one that theoretically put his safety at risk. You’re starting to see how the Harkles are digging their own graves.

It’s contract renewal season, and Levin wants to ensure she stays on the show; that’s why she brought the matter up—to generate publicity and highlight her own work on the program. But Claw didn't exactly leave a good impression in Australia. Or in California, or anywhere else, for that matter.

However the Harkles spin it, if they actually return to the UK, it means hitting rock bottom. And the Harkles have long been stuck in a very deep cave—one they haven't emerged from at all.

https://preview.redd.it/zwfhp6luqfkh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=507e3561ed8dd428ad9ac6c7150eb608f9a503ae

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 11 hours ago

I hate gossip, unless it's really good. 😁(Neil Sean's gossip)

DIVORCE BOOK? DIANA REMEMBERED - LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=No0l1mepNDA

https://preview.redd.it/11avrv06t7kh1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=cb65b30f66e7bad37e4db522a4f7fd01088378b8

Sean says it came as a surprise to many that Charles Spencer is about to release a book about Diana

Sean says he knew that book came from Charles himself.

The other surprise is that it’s coming out now, in August. Typically, books of this kind are published in October. It makes sense: Christmas, gifts, books.

A lot of people have made fun of it being called "Swan Song" because of Spencer's habit of getting divorced and remarried 🤭🤭 Sean was the one who said it 😜😜

Over the years, Charles Spencer has kept what we might call a "low profile," aside from the issues involving his children, their weddings, and their divorces. Otherwise, he is a highly respected and entertaining author, and he has business ventures—such as his furniture line. This piece costs £21,000, but if I had the money, I’d buy it!

https://preview.redd.it/ovrnjx6zu7kh1.png?width=602&format=png&auto=webp&s=b2a60505874b125f66c3284bacb3926259227605

https://www.brightsofnettlebed.co.uk/collections/althorp-collection

It's beautiful—seriously, a beautiful collection. Very expensive, but beautiful.

Next year marks the 30th anniversary of Diana's death, and it seems Harry and Claw are still intent on that documentary about her. That makes sense of the rumor circulating on this sub today—that Harry wanted to reconcile with William because of the 30th anniversary—because Harry desperately needs William to take part in that documentary. Otherwise, it wouldn't make sense.

Now, regarding Charles Spencer, Sean makes it clear that Diana’s brother isn't exactly popular or well-liked among those who lived through that era—especially because he didn't take Diana in at Althorp. And there are many stories Charles Spencer hasn't spoken about publicly in years.

The book is being released under a deal with Penguin Random House. Yes, the very same one—the publisher behind *Spare* and millions of other books. Sean says no—it wasn’t a multi-million-dollar deal; in fact, it’s an agreement based on sales and includes a potential paperback edition—something Harry always refused regarding *Spare*, a stance Sean never understood, given that paperback editions account for the highest volume of book sales.

The agreement also entails Charles Spencer promoting the book on TV shows and likely making his own documentary. This means that Charles Spencer is not collaborating with Harry on the documentary his nephew wants to make about Diana.

That said, Sean states that Charles Spencer’s motivation behind the book is to ensure the Martin Bashir affair is not forgotten. In this regard, Sean has previously recounted that William never understood why Harry did not join in—given that he and his uncle were united in wanting the BBC to take action against Bashir, knowing the underhanded tactics Bashir had used against Diana. Furthermore, a few months ago, Sean reported that William and Charles Spencer were maintaining their stance against Bashir; neither absolves Diana of having spoken out, but both agree that Bashir fueled her paranoia. And both demand that the BBC accept the need to hold people accountable for what happened during that interview—which, once the conditions under which it was conducted came to light around 2014–2015, marked the beginning of the BBC's decline.

https://preview.redd.it/yq46yo0cy7kh1.png?width=634&format=png&auto=webp&s=62916b836b35c45bec79ec7a54dc28a23a3cbe2c

And Sean agrees, because Bashir triggered a series of bad decisions on Diana's part—the worst being giving up the security she had been offered. In that sense, it is a story of "what ifs."

Sean makes it clear that Penguin didn't pay for this book, nor did they provide an advance for a vague one. In other words, Charles Spencer must have shared some truly worthwhile gossip.

According to Sean, there are many controversial elements, and an agreement has already been reached with a newspaper to publish some of these controversial details. However, Sean notes that a significant part of the book focuses on the Bashir affair.

Sean spoke with Charles Spencer, who naturally told him that he would face criticism from all sides. He is aware of this—he knows he will face a lot of backlash—but he believes it is better to tell his own version of events rather than letting others continue to do so, and then let the public decide.

One thing Sean is certain of is that Charles Spencer wouldn't risk speaking ill of Diana, given how many people still love her. Consequently, she will be portrayed in a very positive light.

We'll see what comes of that when we have the first updates.

MARKLE’S LILY & ARCHIE - THIS DID NOT GO TO PLAN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5PfhhpSFjY

https://preview.redd.it/cn56j4k308kh1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=b248623ad34a75bfd8fd3a2d9f6147db506f79fb

And we remain in Altorph.

Sean already mentioned a few days ago that there was some annoyance at Althorp, as they had expected the visit to remain private. Sean also stated that Charles Spencer did not reprimand his nephew but was not happy about the visit.

And it’s become an unpleasant problem because people visiting Altorph for the summer keep asking about the Harkles—what they’re like, where they stayed... like I said, unpleasant.

That same path now.

Well, behind that image lies Claw—Claw and her sick obsession with the cameras. If it isn't her, it has to be "her" children.

This matter has to do with Netflix. Do you remember when Netflix kicked the Harkles out?... Oh, right, they didn't kick them out—how did we come to believe that? That’s what Sean says. He says we shouldn't be ridiculous—how could we think that? They still have a right-of-first-refusal contract.

Hey, Sean is being sarcastic; he always makes fun of that contract.

The thing is, Sean has already said that if there’s one thing Netflix still wants, it’s the documentary about Diana. There are conditions, though—starting with the requirement that Harry line up people who knew Diana but haven't spoken about her publicly. Harry wanted his wife—the "reincarnated Diana"—to play a major role, and Netflix basically said, "Yeah, right—when pigs fly." That’s why there’s been so much conflict behind the scenes over this.

Sean points out that Diana wouldn't have liked that documentary. I don't think so. But I do think Harry has a huge problem. Because Diana had terrible taste in people, meaning certain figures who are currently ostracized—like the "cancelled" Michael Barrymore—could speak about her.

https://preview.redd.it/jqjn7fva38kh1.png?width=2046&format=png&auto=webp&s=07b934078784ea10e1124aa2a862c28a4117de4f

And with good reason, he has been cancelled. He was a very popular presenter in the 1990s, but he was gay (bear in mind the era), an alcoholic, and a drug addict. However, the biggest and most serious controversy of Michael Barrymore's life occurred on March 31, 2001, when Stuart Lubbock was found dead in the swimming pool at his home following a party involving drugs and alcohol—an incident that destroyed his career in British television. In the wake of the shocking death, the party came under intense scrutiny when experts discovered that Lubbock’s blood-alcohol level was three times the legal limit for driving, alongside high levels of cocaine and amphetamines, including ecstasy. Barrymore was arrested as a suspect in 2007 but was later released without formal charges due to a lack of direct evidence linking him to the homicide. Years later, the presenter sued the police for wrongful arrest and won compensation for damage to his reputation.

I think I’ve made it clear why Harry has a problem with the people who knew Diana and who would actually want to speak in that documentary.

The other problem is that Harry wants to focus the documentary on the idea that "my mother was a saint whom everyone adored." In other words, featuring only people who speak well of Diana and speaking only positively about her. And no, that’s not what Netflix wants; Netflix wants gossip!!!!

https://preview.redd.it/h2ahdi9v48kh1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=de5fd42f80fe7687fdc8f1e4dcee86f4df4293d3

And Harry's stance is really absurd, because what did he actually do in his docuseries? Exactly that—he dished the dirt. That’s why people watched it, and that’s why they didn’t watch *Polo* or *With Love*. It’s about the sensationalism—sensationalism sells, and gossip sells. No one wants to see optimistic content featuring Claw and Harry.

So, if there’s no juicy gossip, Netflix won’t want that documentary. But the Harkles aren’t worried, because they think Paramount or Disney will be interested.

Spoiler: that’s not true.

So, really, they only have Netflix. And Netflix wants gossip—and no, Harry’s recollections won’t cut it, because Netflix is ​​already wise to the little duke’s selective memory.

https://preview.redd.it/l5j1tcuz58kh1.png?width=245&format=png&auto=webp&s=cddb4fe2b4f90b2e8411a5dd65b5fe31649a54ef

Netflix wants controversy; it wants sensationalist headlines. And the problem for Harry is that fewer and fewer people want to attack Diana's memory.

Starting with her own brother, Charles Spencer.

MARKLE SAYS NO & HARRY WEAKLY CRUMBLES YET AGAIN.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EH_PYuPjS2M

It’s amazing how the Harkles ruin everything they touch. Everything—absolutely everything—goes wrong.

The Harkles had a golden opportunity to prove they had matured back in July, when the King devoted 47 minutes to them. What did the Harkles do? They ruined everything with their gossip and those silly articles they publish to keep themselves in the media spotlight.

Like that article where Harry supposedly intends to return to the UK more often because he misses his family and wants to see them more.

Those journalists in that WhatsApp group repeated the story without even looking into the matter a little. After all, which family does Harry intend to visit? No one in the British Royal Family wanted to see him in July—except the King. And I say "except the King" because Camilla didn't want to see Harry; she was there for Charles, not for Harry.

And that explains much of the frustration felt by the Harkles that is reflected in those articles. Because they had started out with the idea that it would indeed be a grand reunion—that other members of the Royal Family, starting with William and Kate, would go to see the Sussex children. The Harkles took it for granted that this would happen, because they thought they could exploit the good hearts of Charles and, above all, Kate.

So the Harkles took it for granted that everything would be forgiven by July and that they could announce their grand return to the royal fold to the world.

https://preview.redd.it/9fwt4v0nb8kh1.png?width=790&format=png&auto=webp&s=aa330d7c1bcb26b067e09078b1d9782dd9e5182f

So, the original statement was that the Harkles—both of them—would return to the UK at least four or five times a year. You know: Trooping, certain major ceremonies, and so on. For those events.

However, according to the person who wrote that article—which wasn't Claw—Harry *does* miss his family. But Claw is absolutely furious following her return from the UK. She is furious because they didn't get the photo they needed, and furious because that meeting has been completely forgotten, meaning they can't sell a reconciliation story that clearly never happened. She is also angry because she followed the King's demands to the letter, yet he has done nothing to acknowledge that effort. And, of course, regarding the monarch's statement that everything is forgiven and everyone will move forward: Claw had been counting on that, yet a month has passed without the King showing any sign that the meeting actually mattered to him.

Claw thought that if they at least had the photo of KC3 with her and the children, Netflix would call her back, and people would buy more jams.

https://preview.redd.it/1u3weombd8kh1.png?width=342&format=png&auto=webp&s=84e3f5b512f566081b36bd8d7e380f331e3c5151

A match made in heaven: Harry and Claw are two assholes. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Harry, on the other hand, actually wants to follow through this time on going to the UK more often. And no, it’s not a sign of divorce; it’s a sign that he’s bored.

https://preview.redd.it/ln8n3n9sd8kh1.png?width=335&format=png&auto=webp&s=4478f000f93a239a2d9f4154f3daf821470210a5

Sean had already mentioned this—I think it was around the time Harry was going around ringing people's doorbells. Back then, Harry wanted to get back together with his old friends and hit the bars again—basically doing exactly what they used to do in 2010. Sean heard this from a reliable source; I believe the gossip came up last September, because the source couldn't understand why Harry seemed stuck in the past, while his friends had already matured and weren't interested in doing those things anymore.

Harry is bored. That’s all that’s going on with him right now. And Claw doesn’t want to join him—in anything.

She would only be willing to travel to the UK again if there is a public photo with Charles, William, and Kate. If there isn't one, then she does not want to travel to the UK.

Something the British greatly appreciate.

https://preview.redd.it/ivehkb86f8kh1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=b15b66d538f9eb56af512e3294aae1d076aaf200

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 1 day ago

The difference between false memories and true ones is the same as with jewels: it is always the false ones that appear more real, the most brilliant. (Salvador Dalí, Neil Sean's gossip)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htwbyWaXWCo

Sean thinks it’s high time the mainstream media stopped publishing stories about the Harkles. And let’s be clear: that’s true. Because, as I posted yesterday, we’re seeing ridiculous articles claiming Claw is being "vindicated"—yet when you actually read them, it’s just one absurd statement after another.

But Sean's point is that the Markles have been "Markled."

In this instance—regarding this piece of gossip—Sean frames it as something monumentally absurd. Especially considering that *The Telegraph* saw fit to publish the article.

https://preview.redd.it/12t1so5cr0kh1.png?width=1307&format=png&auto=webp&s=b98cc0043f5e34d5d40dc2c957caaadd19912bbf

No. Absolutely not. And Sean has been saying in several videos, "Why doesn't anyone ask Meghan if she can prove that?" No, nobody asked for proof, even though everyone knows that story is absurd.

Just like the claim that the "As Ever" website has supposedly had more traffic than the royal websites.

https://preview.redd.it/fm79ilf7s0kh1.png?width=1233&format=png&auto=webp&s=c3e625bc79ecf38a8059db95d79a190bcef69bec

I saw the headline in the Express and laughed for hours.

https://preview.redd.it/o3nhi1uks0kh1.png?width=659&format=png&auto=webp&s=4e9c393d0ba644028cdc9616deaae6ceae596fd3

Meghan Markle’s brand had more online visitors to its website than King Charles’s Highgrove shop website had last month, it has been revealed. The Duchess of Sussex, who launched her lifestyle brand As Ever last year, seems to be thriving in the business world.

This is because, since it launched last year, it has had a number of successful product launches, including complete sell-outs. It now appears that Meghan’s brand is also doing well in terms of its website traffic, receiving more views than King Charles III's Highgrove Gardens shop. This does not mean that As Ever got more sales than the Highgrove shop, but it does mean more people viewed the website.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/2239130/meghan-markle-king-charles-win

Because a couple of days later, it was followed by this opinion piece.

https://preview.redd.it/sw1qyd02t0kh1.png?width=635&format=png&auto=webp&s=a7c67cc47ac044864f71da6a5bde867f224c8ebe

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/2239343/meghan-markle-trump-card-king-charles

It has been suggested that data means Meghan Markle has a "trump card" over the King. This is because the Duchess of Sussex's lifestyle brand As Ever had more online visitors to its website than that the webpage for King Charles’s Highgrove shop last month. In July, Meghan's company recorded its lowest monthly web traffic of 2026, with 126,655 visits, data from Similarweb suggested, according to Newsweek. Its six-month average was 176,677 visits.

Meanwhile, the monarch's Highgrove store website got around 48,326 visits in the same month. Its six-month average is 56,574. This works out at the King's site getting nearly 40% of the views Meghan's got.

Looking at it objectively, the whole thing would be something to celebrate... except, as Toms points out, Claw has been promoting her site and products for months. Every day there are (terrible) photos and (even worse) videos about it.

Because, as Toms rightly points out, You'd expect a heck of a lot more visitors to her website as a result.

The King, meanwhile, has done none of this for his shop.

In other words, KC3 doesn't need to go into a frenzy promoting what's sold at Highgrove: people just visit the website and buy the products—and this happens year-round, because the site maintains a steady stream of visitors. Claw makes those awful videos (what on earth was that pink cake? It looked horrible!!), and people go to the website... and that’s it. After all, how many sales does Claw actually make?

Sean scoffs at that—after all, who comes up with headlines like that? Especially when you compare the good taste of the Highgrove website to Claw’s. The only complaint Sean has is that Highgrove’s prices are very high, though whenever he has bought something, the quality was excellent. The same cannot be said for Claw’s products.

Claw looks like what it is—in Sean’s view, a struggling, poorly executed venture—and that defines the whole thing.

Especially because of something Sean has never understood about Claw:

The fact that she can't charge for the images.

https://preview.redd.it/871byuyiv0kh1.png?width=498&format=png&auto=webp&s=36e292cb12ba0671cf4f6c79d5c822ca1522d5e6

Because she doesn't put copyright notices on her photos, they get published without anyone having to pay her. Sean has already criticized this—so when will Claw listen to the advice given by people who actually know about marketing?

So yes, the As Ever website had more visits than Highgrove, but no, it hasn't generated more sales. So no, it’s not a winning hand.

COST HIM DEAR ..HARRY’S NEXT HUGE MISTAKE REVEALED AFTER TANTRUM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykh8UxN4x6M

We still don't know what has happened in the case against ANL. Sean says we will find out this week.

https://preview.redd.it/x29wa3wkw0kh1.png?width=447&format=png&auto=webp&s=34805f97005ad6a9dad7133e7c288f8fb4524d39

In other words, we still have to wait for the outcome of Harry facing off against one of the world's largest news agencies, Associated Newspapers Limited.

Frankly, Harry can spout nonsense about missing his family or wanting to return to London as often as he likes. Neither of those things is going to happen.

Except that Harry has now realized the British press has no qualms about exposing his sordid behavior, precisely because he attacked freedom of speech.

And we return to the previous point: Harry never listens to advice—especially good advice. After all, Harry always believed there would be someone to handle that. These days, the prevailing view in opinion pieces about the Harkles is that the Palace did a great job cleaning up Harry's messes.

Sean and I agree on this: the Palace did a great job, above all, of keeping Harry's stupidity in check. Now, without that control, it is evident that he is very stupid. Especially because Harry opens his mouth.

https://preview.redd.it/tj4onirky0kh1.png?width=399&format=png&auto=webp&s=9607f1f2f0af2a631f80d988afa1b75b047b102b

That is so true—seriously, it is an absolute truth. Especially in Harry's case.

But nothing with Harry is normal. Not with him, nor with Claw. Sean says the press never hounded Claw because, in fact, it was Claw’s team that tipped them off that she would be outside Kensington—after she had already walked the streets for hours without anyone noticing her.

https://preview.redd.it/9z6ekl6ez0kh1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=4edef28027bb0bb6dc0e018164b48a6fbc690beb

Alright, take your seats and enjoy the popcorn. Because things are about to get good.

Seriously, this gossip is good.

https://preview.redd.it/3sbdyaxyz0kh1.png?width=200&format=png&auto=webp&s=e184de34269cc8d6b10ce7ac334c51e5d82e2934

It looks like we will indeed get news about the Sentebale case in September. And it won't be good for Harry at all. I mean, if Harry thinks his image can't get any more tarnished, he’d better brace himself.

Sean says he has managed to access part of the Sentebale case file. I wouldn't believe it was possible if not for the fact that Sean was spot-on regarding the ANL case.

And based on that, Sean says that what Harry said—that nonsense about him not giving Sentebale money, as if Sentebale wanted it—isn't the heart of the matter. "When you look at the documentation, you can see part of the problem of how Dr Sophie Chandauka felt they were losing sight of what the charity was about and not just rocking up and suddenly making a polo series or episode."

This aligns very well with what Tom Bower recounted in his book *Betrayal*. Search this sub, because some of us "sinners" shared what Bower revealed about the situation at Sentebale—details that matched what Neil Sean was reporting in his videos when the story broke in 2025.

https://preview.redd.it/zbkhhv9l11kh1.png?width=782&format=png&auto=webp&s=f541315b1d4f1ce3d2359bb58f8eb0103aa3e44a

According to Sean, things are looking so bad for Harry in that case that, even during the days he spent in London in July, he received advice from a high-ranking official at the Palace. It seems Harry was advised to reach an agreement with Chandauka and admit he was in the wrong. However, that advice was given off the record and in a personal capacity. Sean doesn't say it was KC3 who gave that advice; it appears to have come from Clive Alderton. If that is true, the situation is even worse than what Bower described—and what Bower described was already pretty ugly.

Sean also points out that if we think the story about Charlotte Griffiths’ pill was the worst thing that newspaper had, we are mistaken; in fact, he notes that there are more stories up their sleeve.

So, Sean suggests that the Sentebale affair could prove very costly for Harry, simply because he is incapable of keeping his mouth shut. That absurd claim about not giving money to Sentebale was just as idiotic as the time Harry accused Judge Nicklin of being a "cover-up artist."

It is costly in financial terms, because as the case stands, it looks like Chandauka is going to win. And it is costly in terms of image, because many people have criticized what Harry announced as big news. It came across as petty; it came across as mean-spirited.

Sean thinks this could be strike three for Harry.

https://preview.redd.it/hlx3k1td31kh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=94f0cbbd88d3efef89c2058f67e0d68e2344336e

And yeah, Sean is right; I also thought of the Boy George song with that "Mistake No. 3" thing.

🎼Make mistake number three (yeah)

Make mistake number three

Make mistake number three (yeah)

And make mistake number three

Mistake number🎼

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtGgtSoWV6w

I don't agree with many things Boy George has done or said, but I love Culture Club.

SUSSEXES VERY PUBLIC SWIPE & ATTACK ON WILLS & CATHERINE EXPOSED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AKogtFNk_c

Sean points out that the heart of the conflict is a battle between brothers.

And no, Sean isn't suggesting that William is firing back at Harry or that there is any crossfire. William has moved on with his life.

The problem is that Harry needed William's guidance. It was William who involved Harry in positive endeavors—such as the Royal Foundation or Heads Together. William realized that the path taken by Diana and Charles—using their position to do something positive—was the right one, and he has followed that path. William knows it isn't always a bed of roses, but it remains a positive thing.

And so, the debacle began when William left Harry to his own devices in 2019 by removing him from the Royal Foundation. By then, Harry already had "the Claw" by his side, fueling the envy he felt with remarks suggesting he deserved the same slice of the pie as William—that he could do the same things William did.

Sean doesn't single out Claw as *the* culprit. Harry harbored those latent thoughts... it’s just that his empty head couldn't figure out how to actually carry out acts like William's.

https://preview.redd.it/6eitic0c61kh1.png?width=1183&format=png&auto=webp&s=d505ff0d40e3e660bb522f4b67667d3f85a914ec

Sean says that not only William, but also KC3 and many others did a lot to help Harry achieve a period of stability. But "Claw" had to come along, and—being the narcissist she is—she targeted Harry's vulnerabilities: his hair loss, his inevitable aging, and so on. Claw sold Harry the story that she could handle everything.

https://preview.redd.it/xr76sjuy61kh1.png?width=1287&format=png&auto=webp&s=6ab77c25553f2a37d94750b92e4bc709148ae35a

Sean says that headline didn't just come from that infamous WhatsApp group of journalists linked to the Harkles, but that the goal was to attack William.

And we know the Harkles won't stop with that nonsense.

https://preview.redd.it/m5kxg75d71kh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=47226995e6afb08cdfa49b91976903b3064f7a0e

Sean reiterates what he—and we here on this sub—have said: did Harry meet with his family? No, he met with the King and Camilla; no one else in the BRF wanted to see him. And a 47-minute meeting is nothing to write home about.

And the reason for that headline is something Sean has already shared: Harry is furious because William not only refused to budge but has shown not the slightest interest in meeting the Sussex children. None at all.

In fact, Sean has said—and now reiterates—that Harry does not understand why William does not allow George, Charlotte, and Louis to meet their Sussex cousins.

Guys, don't wear yourselves out; we could line up one by one to explain it to him, and he still wouldn't want to understand.

The point is that Harry is playing his last card: the children. The "Invisikids" are still just children. And that is all Harry has left to try to worm his way back into the Royal Family. Well, that didn't happen. The children didn't succeed in making William interested in seeing Harry. William doesn't even want to see photos of those children.

So, what will Harry do? Persist. And he wants to insist that George, Charlotte, and Louis see their cousins.

https://preview.redd.it/rdl2zu5z81kh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=ba2a5ae6e08d2a2d7b3c4b3776a53e17d288ca4c

On the other hand, Claw is insisting as well.

About what?

Oh, she wants copies of the photos taken at Highgrove because, supposedly, the "invisikids" have been asking about them.

....

....

....

https://preview.redd.it/a30wq65c91kh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=8e167f6a7bbcd6e9d6bf2c9a6c25832d80d5f22f

I can't—seriously, I can't deal with this. I mean, I know Neil Sean didn't just make it up for clicks, because no one would invent something so absurd. But I want to believe he made it up, because it is just too absurd.

And I know Sean didn't make this up, because he’s right about what he says. Do any of you remember who you took photos with when you were seven? Did any of you, at age seven, even know who you were being photographed with? Except for those clueless people who didn't understand a thing about what happened in July. Those kids are in for a rude awakening when they hit their teens.

Sean says that Harry wanting to return to the UK is a threat to William and Kate: "You might ignore us, but we are going to come back."

https://preview.redd.it/nxwou6e8a1kh1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=864890ac2346b675596a4d4c336b2799d5be1c40

Now, Sean says "we," but in reality, it’s just Harry—not Claw; Claw only made the trip for the photos, and she wants them. She needs them. And she did get some—like in Altorph, though it seems things didn't go so well with the Spencers there. Sean says that behind the scenes, there is disappointment regarding the Harkles' behavior.

And Sean says it isn't even Harry—that it was just a headline generated to stir up controversy involving the Waleses, portraying William as the villain standing in the way of the "good son" Harry and the King.

So, Harry is using unscrupulous journalists to manipulate the public through the press. Wasn't that exactly what Harry complained about in his lawsuits against the press—the lies they told about him?

https://preview.redd.it/0qggaq64c1kh1.png?width=476&format=png&auto=webp&s=b437c82fa69d674f8440ee5b36c7f19e8ae0605a

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 2 days ago

This really is exhausting (Neil Sean's gossip)

INVICTUS PILE PRESSURE & THIS IS HARRY’S & MARKLE'S ANSWER

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6xJ3V_xzu8

Honestly, I thought it was a joke.

So Harry announced he wasn't going to collaborate with Sentebale? Sorry, but didn't he leave the organization last year? What is the point of that announcement if he stepped down a year ago and isn't wanted at Sentebale?

Now I understand some of the comments. I thought it was old news.

But why give money to Elephants and not to Invictus? What is it that Harry doesn't grasp—that Invictus needs 25 million?

When has Harry donated money to Invictus?

I mean, the only thing Harry did in July was... what exactly did he do for Invictus? Nothing. Because Alison Hammond wasn't there with him that Friday for *his* sake; she was there because ITV wants to acquire the broadcasting rights for the 2027 Games. Harry hasn't done anything for Invictus.

Harry could have had Sharon Osbourne on his side, after all... were it not for the fact that she was ruthless in her criticism of the Harkles. Now, Harry is capable of overlooking that and has tried to get in touch with her. But it looks like he’s got the wrong number again 🤣

https://preview.redd.it/7wfbugk0ytjh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=8da57fddb36433d8ef21ce73741eab9020780791

Now, since Invictus needs 25 million—but Harry isn't going to donate a penny—he is trying to put together a professional video to attract donors.

Sean says he hasn't filmed it yet, but it's something Harry should have done... a year ago. 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

Harry would be doing it now, but out of desperation. After all, who does he have to support him? Not the Kardashians, not Sharon Osbourne. Not even Elton anymore. It could be James Corden, but who would care?

It seems the person she managed to connect with was *American Idol* Alum Pia Toscano, whom she met at David Foster's gala.

You don't know who that is either? Oh, what a relief! Because I have no clue. I mean, she's someone from *American Idol*... Wait, is that show still on?

It looks like the person he hooked up with was Pia Toscano—someone he met at David Foster's gala.

You know what's funny? That woman was actually at the 2024 Viña Festival. AHHH, the lady who sang with Andrea Bocelli! I didn't even notice; I was too busy looking at Matteo Bocelli. 🤭🤭

https://preview.redd.it/q6vq1gx4ytjh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=149e9dcd1a9ceb033ffcf535591804fdb28f549f

It was to the woman that Claw blurted out a ridiculous line, purely to show off.

https://preview.redd.it/0bo9zft7ytjh1.png?width=168&format=png&auto=webp&s=4027e375c8449d7c7fee60d17d5515ff41a52513

Uh-huh, yeah—was it wonderful for you when you said you had a miscarriage and preeclampsia?

Harry also hopes that David Foster will help him recruit other singers to participate in Invictus.

And the complication—since the matter is still in the early stages—is that Harry apparently wouldn't mind if Katharine McPhee appeared in that video supporting the Invictus Games.

Why would she do it?

Sean says that Harry has suddenly realized Invictus might be what saves his reputation from the whole Sentebale and ANL disaster. Yes, that may be, but who will save Harry from the disaster that is African Parks?

The bottom line is that the Invictus mess is no longer something Harry can ignore, yet—as always—he believes it can be resolved with just a couple of measures. An increasing number of reporters are saying that, at this rate, it looks like the 2027 Games won't happen.

SUSSEX BOMBSHELL DROPPED TO KING ON UK VISIT LEFT SHOCKED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-_I37aNkiI

Well, Harry is supposedly planning to travel to the UK every three months.

But why is he announcing it? No one has told him he can't travel; in fact, behind the whole unpleasant saga surrounding Philip and the Queen's final days lies the fact that Harry and Claw traveled all over the place during the pandemic—except to the UK. They’ve been traveling for years—except to the UK. Now, all of a sudden, Harry wants to travel there every three months—ostensibly to see his family.

Let's see... which family? The one that hasn't made the slightest gesture to see you in years? The family that has never offered you a room? The one that didn't want to see you last time, even though you said you were coming with your children? That family?

https://preview.redd.it/jnhtumu9ytjh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=127858633e1c32f6c68db574d8fe2910a96b75e2

If Harry thinks doing that will guarantee him something, he hasn't understood a thing. If Charles leaves him an inheritance, he’ll have to pay the applicable tax; there’s no escaping that. And if he expects Charles to give him money—well, wasn't it Harry himself who said Charles only gave him money if he worked? Oh God, I swear I cried when I read that in Spare.

https://preview.redd.it/7u3qd9gcytjh1.png?width=336&format=png&auto=webp&s=b263bab8d202d4d7742977f538472694052c5e74

Harry fails to grasp that if he were to approach William, William would give him an "I told you so" look. After all, William warned Harry to take his time getting to know Claw and to see if she truly wanted that royal life. There’s an article circulating where a "source" claims Harry was angry because Kate had plenty of time to prepare for royal life, whereas Claw didn't. I still can't quite wrap my head around that, seeing as no one forced Harry to marry a woman he barely knew. And William had warned him. But things go in one of Harry's ears and straight out the other—and very quickly, too—because there’s absolutely nothing inside that skull 😜😜😜

Harry and Claw believe they followed the rules back in July. So why hasn't the King released the photos taken at Highgrove? Because yes, there were photos: a photo of the King and Camilla with the Sussexes, and a separate photo of the King with the two children. Don't argue about the source; Sean has already revealed who his source is, and it is a very good one.

But... ah!!! I missed this kind of gossip; yesterday's wasn't that good! 😁

Well, it turns out there was an argument. And at two of the places they visited. The Harkles wanted to know what the future held for them. And it seems... oh, boy, I really hope this is what happened... but it looks like the King threw the way they’ve treated Thomas Markle right in the Harkles' faces.

And the Harkles, it seems—Sean says he phrases everything that way, like "allegedly," to avoid legal issues—let it be known that they have absolutely no intention of contacting Thomas Markle, either now or in the future.

To Charles, what the Harkles say and do makes no sense. What kind of empathy is that? Especially when Charles sees the great relationship William has with the Middleton family.

So, the situation has become quite complicated. Because the Harkles have absolutely no intention of contacting anyone except Charles.

I wonder why it's only with him. How curious. 😏😏

https://preview.redd.it/vix1aknoytjh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=87060676126288ecd9b7a56cd7c08b8d1d68d0d9

WILLIAM - MAKE YOUR MIND UP & FAST HARRY- WILLIAM HAVING ZERO NONSENSE THIS TIME

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6gSQImNML4

Supposedly, Harry and Claw had such a good time in the UK that Harry plans to return more often... next year.

Wait a minute. So there’s no invitation to Balmoral—not even for Christmas?

https://preview.redd.it/l8tmb8kiytjh1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=9a4d504547fb95ddb426622aa5a690ac92b0a270

Yeah, I’m just as surprised as Renault was to find an illegal casino in Rick’s bar. What a surprise. 😏😏

And Harry intends to see his family more because he suddenly realized he missed them.

https://preview.redd.it/2u8em1nkytjh1.png?width=250&format=png&auto=webp&s=1df08600e1e1227cf6ea5b48baa11ec5a9e34828

And Sean comes back with "I don't want to be unpleasant, but..."—it's actually a great story, because when you think about it, this is a couple that has literally failed across the board; things have gone wrong on every level, and even something as simple as a red carpet falls apart.

https://preview.redd.it/9lamy3jmytjh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=7c0da076a6edef9947f23df99a036eea11cafd78

The kings of chaos. Wherever the Harkles go, something happens. Sean says the Harkles can't live without drama. That benefits David Foster, because he’s received free publicity.

The problem is that Martha Stewart caused harm. And let's be realistic: Martha knew what she was saying, and that’s why she said it. It’s been—what, two weeks?—or something like that, and Martha hasn't retracted her statement. Foster made an irrelevant statement that nobody really cared about. Martha hasn't backed down. So, what is Claw doing now?

https://preview.redd.it/m0rqg9bqytjh1.png?width=365&format=png&auto=webp&s=3461006999d9f6d3103395071fa7d3615d83d725

That's right—crying to Harry. Sean says that, at this point, he's surprised that trick still works on Harry. It's incredible; how does Harry not get tired of the same drama?

Right. You’ve probably realized by now, haven’t you? The month has already passed. Which one? Ah, Harry had 28 days to give notice that he was returning to London and to ask that a room be prepared for him at Buckingham Palace or St. James’s Palace. Harry was due back on September 13th for the WellChild Awards, and it is currently August 16th. The 28-day window has already closed.

And Sean has said he learned that Harry hasn't given any notice that he intends to stay in one of those rooms.

So, once again, Harry is hoping that by not giving advance notice, he’ll finally end up staying at Windsor. He wants to stay there, where William and Kate are. And he hopes that—just by chance—he’ll be out for a walk and, oops!, he’ll run into William.

https://preview.redd.it/iz3ck2mwztjh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=51d93fc15fe85cac97202f1b2477248267bdebf3

Last time, back in July, the Palace took the precaution of repeatedly asking Harry whether or not he accepted the room being offered. In other words, the Palace is well aware that Harry didn't want to let them know simply because he didn't feel like it—there was no other reason. So, they did it again this time to ensure Harry wouldn't make a scene like he did in July.

https://preview.redd.it/ac1ehi6k0ujh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=0a004ca401babb24d5ff49171508fb3964a4ee0c

William is aware of the situation, so he is consulting with senior officials to make decisions and avoid another spectacle from the Harkles.

That said, it is fairly certain that "Claw" won't be showing up in September—a relief for everyone. And that’s because she doesn't want to be around when the Sentebale case looks set to blow up. Oh, right—the UK legal year is opening. Claw knows she is at the center of the controversy, so she’ll keep her distance, leaving Harry alone once again—yes, yet again.

https://preview.redd.it/gorxfd4b1ujh1.jpg?width=654&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=619e282b3ba3af1585330d7e68cdf0cf81debfd5

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 3 days ago

Meghan 'vindicated' as secret palace move bypasses William and Kate (The Express)

https://archive.ph/hcdLs

Meghan Markle is feeling "vindicated" after a major palace move bypassed Prince William and Princess Catherine, an insider has said. The 41-year-old travelled to the UK last month, joining Prince Harry and their two children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, on a visit to meet with King Charles. The meeting was reportedly held in private at Highgrove House.

The meeting was seemingly held without permission from William and Catherine, which, according to Heat Magazine, likely "boosted Meghan's confidence". An insider told the publication: "It’s becoming increasingly clear they don’t need William and Kate’s approval, which has really boosted Meghan’s confidence. The fact that Charles is working so hard to put this rift in the past and lay the groundwork for their future – not just for Harry and Meghan, but for their children – is hugely satisfying."

*The insider added: "*Both Meghan and Harry believe that both William and Kate went out of their way to make life as difficult as possible for them and tried to block a reconciliation at every turn. Ultimately, they failed, so Meghan and Harry feel vindicated. That being said, they would still very much like to have a better relationship with William and Kate, but even if that never happens, they believe they and their children now have a place within the family."

Did anyone tell Meghan that Highgrove House already belongs to William? That the King leases the house to William? That Charles held that meeting after speaking with William?

So, William and Kate are the ones who have prevented a reconciliation? When did Harry actually want that? Only now, when his life has gone off a cliff. He didn't consider that when he badmouthed Camilla, did he?

And Charles isn't going to disown his son Harry. But Meghan perhaps hasn't grasped that no one in the British Royal Family wants to meet her children. So, what is their place in a family that has no interest in seeing them?

express.co.uk
u/Human-Economics6894 — 4 days ago

We cannot solve problems by using the same thinking methods we used when we created them. (Albert Einstein, Neil Sean's gossip)

https://preview.redd.it/w4kguaaxemjh1.png?width=1329&format=png&auto=webp&s=a9e1381df2a90d75b6bde6b65197dac2bc038160

MARKLE MELTDOWN, HARRY’S DESPERATE MOVE & NOW THIS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHy-lUrD5O8

2025 wasn't a good year for the Harkles.

2026 has been one disaster after another.

It is remarkable how easily the Harkles manage to get into trouble; the moment they open their mouths, they ruin their lives.

Recent days have seen the failure of Cookie Queens (including the fact that Markle doesn't even remember what her favorite cookie was), Martha Stewart, and David Foster.

And next week, on Monday, we will find out what happens regarding the legal costs of the ANL case. But if they thought that would put an end to the Harkles, they are mistaken, because more and more noise is being made about Sentebale.

But above all, Claw remembers nothing. She focuses only on the projects currently in the works; past ones have ceased to exist. That is how *As Ever* is fading away, just as *40x40* did—and the podcasts, and so on.

The problem is that there are people like Neil Sean who not only have a good memory but also a YouTube channel.

Because if you were to look for the interview Jamie Kern Lima did with Claw, it turns out it has been disappearing. Just like the interview Oprah did, or the one with Bloomberg. They are vanishing as if they had never happened.

https://preview.redd.it/clrjrhx0hmjh1.png?width=2890&format=png&auto=webp&s=d24486ca55b46d0310aaa164c19bed57d82109a7

And now, all attention has shifted to an episode of Jamie's podcast about "Identifying a Narcissist."

Darling, you had a classic narcissist right in front of you and didn't realize it.

But Sean is right: Kern has interviewed a lot of people, so that doesn't necessarily have to refer to Claw.

Sean says that in the world Kern moves in—and the one he moves in himself—it is hard to tell who is truly a narcissist because everyone craves fame. So, Kern could have been referring to many people in his circle, not just Claw. But Sean also points out that Kern has been somewhat out of the loop regarding Claw; something happened behind the scenes there. Claw's eternal problem: something is always going on behind the scenes.

Claw could use some good publicity for its jam—or rather, its spread. Sean says the latest one—blackberry—is overpriced considering how runny it is. He’s not the only one saying so; others on social media feel the same way. Sure, Claw gets publicity, and yes, people have bought the jam, but clearly, the products aren't selling well enough to clear out the inventory.

And Sean says that one of the major problems *As Ever* is facing is that Netflix has dropped the brand. Once Netflix dropped it, many celebrities lost interest in what Claw sends out. Yes, she still sends them her products, but no one posts about them on social media. Why promote a product that faces harsh criticism—risking one's own image in the process—and do it for free, to boot?

But Harry decided to ignore that—to ignore the financial losses As Ever has incurred. He is looking at his cousin James. Having finished school and now entering university, James decided not to take a gap year.

He is set to enroll at the Royal Agricultural University in Gloucestershire, founded in 1845 as the first agricultural university in the English-speaking world. This news follows the revelation that, over the summer, the Earl of Wessex had been doing farm work at the Sandringham estate—one of the Windsor properties that is not part of the Crown Estate. And no, it is not a random decision. Estate management is one of the most important lessons Charles III learned during his long tenure as Prince of Wales. Over the course of decades, he professionalized the Duchy of Cornwall, modernized it, made it profitable, and transformed it into a European model of sustainable agriculture, conservation, and territorial development.

https://preview.redd.it/ac5vyc4jlmjh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=ee1883adb0e4a7f5f24041f8a736890f2d953f6a

And then there’s Savannah Phillips—15 years old and another potential successor. She is another young woman who stays out of controversy; her father keeps a low profile, and she is one of Charlotte’s most beloved "cousins." In other words, in a couple of years, Louise, James, Savannah, and George will all be ready to work for the Firm. There is no room for Harry in that setup.

https://preview.redd.it/atfi5vhpmmjh1.png?width=387&format=png&auto=webp&s=fd09b4b15718972109aee2925a5fc330fe71b3d6

Harry never understood that the British Royal Family’s problem isn't a lack of people. It isn't like Japan, which is facing a very serious crisis within its royal family. It is a matter of not being a burden on the public purse. The Royal Family does have potentially useful members—and Harry has never been either useful or indispensable within that group

Now, Sean thinks the coming days will be interesting for George, who will be on his own at Eton for several days of the week, while the Wales household will have to deal with the teenager. William has already said they’ve had their fair share of that 🤭🤭

And that hurts Harry. It’s not a matter of ignoring that it’s all his fault—he doesn’t see it that way, but it is. Yet, one cannot ignore the fact that Harry is only just realizing he had an extended family—people he could turn to—and now he only has Claw. And that is the worst part of all. Harry sees his irrelevance becoming increasingly apparent—even to Claw. He matters only when he is useful to her; whenever she can replace him, she does.

But the hardest thing for Harry is the fact that he is not only irrelevant to the British Royal Family, but is also treated as such. Harry has railed against Camilla in the rudest ways possible, yet each time he finds her even more firmly entrenched. She is indispensable; he is not.

And Harry does not understand why his complaints about her fail to produce the effect he expects. Don't even bother trying; he doesn't want to understand. He simply sees that things are not turning out in his favor.

Especially because nothing he has said against Camilla has undermined the relationship she has with William and Kate. They have grown much closer over the years, regularly getting together for dinner, conversation, and outings.

And the most unpleasant thing for Harry in all this is that Camilla didn't take the bait. She was very kind and cordial toward Harry and Claw in July. Harry had expected something else, but instead, he encountered a Camilla against whom he couldn't find fault.

https://preview.redd.it/s5dvq5hzymjh1.png?width=1380&format=png&auto=webp&s=6b74bf1a658c214d7fbbfca8ba61267c89b46eb5

And Harry is increasingly realizing that the July meeting was a huge mistake. The criticisms leveled at Camilla run up against the fact that she is an intelligent woman. She wasn't there to exact revenge on Harry, but to support KC3—and that is exactly what she did. So yes, she was kind and cordial.

Sean makes it clear that the source of the gossip starts with "Tom" and ends with "Parker-Bowles."

So, Harry is now considering the idea that he should try to win Camilla over. After all, if Camilla accepts him, Charles will accept him—and eventually, William and Kate will too. But that isn't going to happen. Not only because Camilla hasn't forgotten what Harry said, but because the idiot failed to realize he had already missed his chance. Harry and "Claw" should have apologized to Camilla. But neither of them did. And neither of them did because they had attacked her fully aware of what they were doing. So, an apology now would ring hollow.

https://preview.redd.it/c2rgtz0txmjh1.jpg?width=1024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0643cefc5f1371a02e7331767787d184635cb559

And so, Harry gets dragged wherever it suits Claw. And every time they go out, it’s a disaster. Sean says it’s pure comedy; not even AI could conjure up the kind of mess the Harkles create—like what happened with that chase in New York. Sean says he spoke to the NYPD chief, who told him such a chase was impossible—something Sean knows firsthand, since taking the subway is faster in New York.

https://preview.redd.it/vuhtqaxkqmjh1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=b8eab8844085ddf4d87fa6d93ccadbe9fc227c2a

It’s like Santiago, Chile, at certain times of day: you might be packed in like a sardine on the subway for about 20 minutes... but that beats spending four hours stuck in a traffic jam 😭😭😭 And you’d actually be happy it was only four hours, considering that a few weeks ago, people were stuck for six hours in one part of Santiago. I mean, that’s the equivalent of three round trips to Valparaíso—longer than the time it takes to get to Coquimbo!! 😭😭

But when Harry goes alone, those things never happen. Other things do happen—because Harry opens his mouth—but never those kinds of absurd and totally impossible situations.

Harry traveled to New York for the *Time* magazine event. At this point, it is so ridiculous for the Harkles to keep pretending they are actually being honored with awards for something.

And several people were surprised that Claw didn't go. I mean, the flight and accommodation were free. She didn't go because only Harry could deliver the speech for that award. There was no room for her; she wouldn't be able to speak.

https://preview.redd.it/t60j9u4dsmjh1.png?width=399&format=png&auto=webp&s=30ffbd5b7d1f9947c6ec2bd210f6bbadc3930a46

The real story behind that piece of gossip—and what surprised Sean at the time—was that Harry didn't insist on Claw joining him on stage. This is a recent development; since late last year, Harry has relaxed the requirement that Claw must accompany him whenever he is invited to appear.

Claw didn't want to go under those conditions—she needs to be wanted, to be allowed to speak—and the organizers, knowing this, apparently made Harry sign an agreement stating that *he* would give a speech. Him, and only him.

Something that is also happening at Invictus.

MARKLE MYSTERY REVEALED ....LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4ppAgFVAgw

AHHH!!! Now I understand the mockery Nicole Kidman faced on various sites.

https://preview.redd.it/dqd3cpphzmjh1.png?width=399&format=png&auto=webp&s=1a4be9dad6e3e0ab6b66d70b04d5fa8dd4226e92

Kidman looks unrecognizable in a new photoshoot for British Vogue magazine.She says she learned how to apply makeup from trans friends.

No, I can't comment on that because I'm in shock. 😱😱😱😱😱😱

Sean, who has moved in those circles, says that what Kidman said is nonsense. It is simply a matter of ticking a box—showing up with a story while doing a promotional tour.

But that’s Hollywood for you—a fake and hypocritical world.

David Foster and his current wife, Katharine McPhee, are not friends with the Harkles. They have a relationship, but friends? No.

Foster used the Harkles; the Harkles are royals for hire.

That said, both started at the same point.

https://preview.redd.it/nap0h0tx0njh1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=0043e055506e764c1bcaf1977b974698b945824f

And both of them married rich guys—though McPhee married a genuine millionaire, who took an interest in her because, besides being young and beautiful, she is talented. Regardless of other, less flattering opinions, she has talent.

Claw... Claw married Harry. And that’s where her biography ends.

https://preview.redd.it/37qlha3w1njh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=ce341a2059abf23edc698ebe11da50badccdedf9

According to Sean's version of events, McPhee has no interest in playing up the idea that she and Claw are close friends. This is because she never forgave Claw for not taking the time to see her in the musical *Waitress*. Claw was dating Harry at the time and could have helped her "great friend" out, but she chose not to. Now that the "great friend" has become much more powerful, Claw wants to pretend they are close, but it is nothing more than a typical Hollywood relationship.

Foster has never given money to As Ever, right? And he hasn't received any of the boxes either, has he? That would work in Claw's favor. Adam Levine performed at Foster's foundation... but he never responded to Claw, who tried to get in touch with him.

That’s how the world Claw loves so much works. That’s why it’s hard to spot a narcissist in that crowd—because so many of them are one. 🤭🤭

Just a bit of gossip for today, because the rest is political or about Buckingham Palace. Poor Sean—he just can't wrap his head around the fact that they don't want to go live in that palace. And he’s certainly not a liberal—there’s no doubt about that—so that’s all for today.

https://preview.redd.it/9p746udv3njh1.png?width=501&format=png&auto=webp&s=27baf1f7b744b2fa7fd833b49653a0b194e9795d

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 4 days ago

They demand sincerity but get offended if you tell them the truth. So, what am I supposed to do: offend you with sincerity or lie to you out of politeness? (Anonymous, Neil Sean's gossip)

Some are like Harry and have a bad memory.

Others, like Sean—unfortunately for Harry—have a YouTube channel 🤭😈

https://preview.redd.it/xwvaw9smafjh1.png?width=1325&format=png&auto=webp&s=773aff4aa03b39625574cc65850fda302e5ecdbb

WALLIS , THE DUKE & BILLY- THIS YOU DON'T KNOW

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUP3IYarTZY

https://preview.redd.it/mg60l09abfjh1.png?width=1325&format=png&auto=webp&s=02c34f3d3aeebc7b7d5a6c3c1d54b2395f8ab002

As Sean was involved in the theater world and performed in various productions—both in London and on Broadway—he was able to meet many people.

Among them was Backstairs Billy.

https://preview.redd.it/tonybxutbfjh1.png?width=596&format=png&auto=webp&s=938e639c725a5f0124607f0e804237dc8428c3d0

William Tallon—known as Billy Tallon or "Backstairs Billy"—was a butler who worked for the British Royal Family and served as a member of the Queen Mother's staff at Clarence House in London. He began working for the Royal Family at the age of fifteen, dedicating fifty-one years of continuous service to them. He became the Queen Mother's closest aide, confidant, and page; she famously adored his flamboyant style and the gin cocktails he prepared for her exactly to her liking.

He was a highly controversial figure with a very extravagant life. I do not have the space here to discuss all those controversies.

https://preview.redd.it/l3ec5zczcfjh1.png?width=679&format=png&auto=webp&s=50f7f4aec683acc1b1fc671f99844f2eeb095209

Well, he was a friend of Sean's.

He met him at a theater event, as Sean worked in the West End and Tallon loved that world. He was a storyteller—entertaining and elegant. At the time, Sean didn't know the significance of the nickname "Backstairs Billy," which referred to the man who pulled all the strings at the Queen Mother's Clarence House.

Sean met him after "Backstairs Billy's" sad departure from the Palace. And it was indeed sad, as he learned he had been fired from a journalist ( https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/apr/02/queenmother.monarchy ).

It is a story that Princess Margaret's former employees also experienced. The Palace can be very brutal.

When Sean met him, Billy was also—let’s say—a "widower," because his partner of 30 years, Reginald Wilcock, had passed away a couple of years before the Queen. I’m not being sarcastic; while "widower" is a formal marital status, I’m using the term in an emotional sense.

Billy spent much of his final years in coffee shops because he felt very lonely. And since he was no longer with people to whom he owed loyalty, he told stories—some, Sean said, likely more embellished than others.

Sean was on his way to an audition for a musical about Wallis and Edward, and he mentioned it to Billy. Billy then told him the backstory of Philip and Wallis.

The Queen Mother was a formidable woman. She wasn't someone you’d want to cross. She was a person who could be very kind, but also very tough. A bit like Kate—that backbone of steel.

And, as I mentioned to you yesterday, the Queen and Philip did not have the best of relationships. To her, Philip was not the ideal man for her daughter. And they argued about many things, because both had strong personalities and were firm in their decisions, and both held great influence over Elizabeth.

But the person the Queen Mother always viewed as the worst of the lot was Wallis. The Queen Mother could not put the past behind her; she could not forgive the bad influence Wallis had on Edward—an influence that led to the abdication and everything that followed. Consequently, she did not want Wallis staying at Buckingham Palace when she had to travel to the UK for her husband's funeral.

https://preview.redd.it/pqr24v3xifjh1.png?width=487&format=png&auto=webp&s=b2e6a0c1b4c9caa1f6bfd1a664816bbf4fb29164

Then Philip stepped in. Once again, they clashed fiercely—just as they had over the issue of Elizabeth’s coronation, the first to be televised. The Queen Mother and Mary of Teck had opposed the broadcast, but Philip insisted on it. He won that battle.

Now, regarding Wallis, Philip intervened in the face of strong opposition to her staying at Buckingham Palace. Philip was certainly no fan of Wallis—quite the opposite; on that point, he agreed with his mother-in-law. Yet, Philip made it clear that personal feelings aside, Edward had been King—abdicated, yes, but King nonetheless—and Wallis was his widow. So, she had to be accorded the respect due a king's widow.

Billy told Sean that the original plan was to put Wallis up at a hotel favored by the royals: The Goring. However, Philip felt that wouldn't look right; according to what Billy told Sean, it was also Philip’s idea for Elizabeth to visit Edward before he died.

So Sean asked Billy who was really calling the shots behind the scenes. And Billy, very politely, told him that behind the scenes, the Duke of Edinburgh did far more than people realized at the time. He made the major decisions, and Elizabeth carried them out.

Including the picture I posted of the Queen, Wallis, and the Queen Mother. That image was very difficult for them, but the Duke spoke with them—and especially with his wife—telling her, "That is what is expected of you."

It was very difficult for the Queen Mother to make that gesture, because she could never forgive the fact that all the stress caused by the situation Edward created over Wallis had destroyed her husband's health. Of course, she will never accept the fact that King George's death was largely caused by his smoking habit. But apart from that, the fact is that she saw that Philip was right. Painfully right.

Ultimately, although the Queen Mother and Philip never got along, they shared certain things in common: a deep love for Elizabeth and the heavy burden of upholding the monarchy. And Billy told Sean that Philip was focused on that—on always being his wife's rock and defending the monarchy.

But the arguments between Philip and the Queen Mother never ended, because the years 2001–2002 were to mark the Queen's Silver Jubilee—and Philip and the Queen Mother wanted different things. Someone mentioned in a book that the Queen Mother's passing brought Elizabeth a sense of relief, as she sometimes felt caught in the middle. Just like in many families 🤭

I highly doubt there would be such a generous gesture toward Claw if Harry were to pass away first.

https://preview.redd.it/e2la8h6mmfjh1.png?width=1334&format=png&auto=webp&s=0d4adabc6dcadeba3f1b386ec4fbf7748d8bdb01

HARRY, THAT VISA & THIS IMAGE MEANS HE IS FINISHED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmT-IwUCoSQ

By now, Harry practically has permanent residency in the Earth's core; after all, it’s impossible for anyone to have a grave dug as deep as his.

And this is where it comes down to Harry, because he leveled a series of accusations against his family and many other people in *Spare*. Yet none of that is as serious as slipping a pill to a woman he had barely met that very night.

And the dirty laundry keeps coming out.

This is worse than what happened with the visa. But let’s not overlook the fact that the visa issue is serious. Because, from any perspective, Harry is absolutely terrified of his application coming to light. Why? What is in there that he doesn't want known? Harry might claim, "It's private." Okay, sure, it is private, but that argument—coming from someone who dedicated a whole chapter to his "Mr. Happy"—sounds pretty ridiculous.

https://preview.redd.it/laoe8vr8ofjh1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=62e642c04d924db733f4a51a68d4a991677d26f5

So, we find out what happens with Harry when he uses the Elizabeth Arden cream, but not about his visa?

I can't get over having read that. I could easily read Harry's visa documents, but I still can't believe what I read in *Spare*.

https://preview.redd.it/umsujywiofjh1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=5bce895d9cf6e4b9e38507c11492ddd6411bf921

Harry doesn't realize what he's doing because he's too busy envying what William has.

In fact, I think Claw was misled by Harry, in the sense that he always made it appear as though he had more money than he actually did. Saving has never been part of Harry's vocabulary; he used to squander money, and I believe Claw thought he was a millionaire. It must have been a rude awakening to discover he wasn't. That doesn't stop her from spending Harry's money, but he wasn't the millionaire she thought he was. And Sean points out the same thing in this video: that Claw thought she would have millions to spend every month. That wasn't the case. She did spend a lot of money, but she shouldn't have.

But Harry couldn't bear the fact that he would always have less than William. In fact, Harry wanted a slice of the Duchy of Cornwall.

https://preview.redd.it/vpln6wr2qfjh1.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=b7c0dffd133859f5cce801e8f4fc406220dbdd87

Learning Mexican Spanish.

The term "fresa" is one of the most popular Mexicanisms; it is used to describe a person—usually young—who belongs to an upper social class or who adopts behaviors, idioms, and a lifestyle that project an image of wealth and status.

A Harry. 🤣🤣🤣

Claw doesn't understand that much of what she thinks Harry might inherit, he won't; it will pass to George and his children—assuming the monarchy still exists.

But anyway, that doesn't matter to Harry right now. It will matter when it's too late, but for the moment, his priority was preventing his visa application from being made public. And Sean says that, however you look at it, that reflects poorly on the British Royal Family, because Harry drags the family's reputation down simply by virtue of being the King's son.

And Sean says it is quite a coincidence that this news appears just when the visa issue is causing annoyance.

https://preview.redd.it/gknfoec0sfjh1.png?width=1021&format=png&auto=webp&s=a94f1d21419bb7f37b76fb779f4396a5698b5792

https://www.gbnews.com/royal/prince-harry-award-ceremony-travalyst

Prince Harry's sustainable travel organisation, Travalyst, has been shortlisted for the Skift IDEA Awards 2026, competing in the Travel Technology and Sustainability Tech categories.

The Skift IDEA Awards are the travel industry's leading global awards honouring achievements in design, creativity, and innovation. The nomination for Harry's company was confirmed on Monday evening.

Had any of you heard of this? I hadn't, and Sean has no idea where that came from either.

The thing is, it’s just another distraction. Because the question is: what is Harry afraid of that makes him not want his visa to be made public?

Harry could do the honorable and decent thing and...

No, I’m not going to write that. Sean is a good person if he still believes the words "Harry" and "honorable and decent" can go in the same sentence.

What does this have to do with Charlotte Griffiths' story about the pill?

Well, aside from a statement from his unnamed "spokesperson" claiming the object wasn't a pill but a Tic Tac, Harry hasn't called his lawyers to threaten the Mail or Griffiths over that story. That’s curious, especially to Sean—who actually did receive legal threats for saying Australian taxpayers would foot the bill for the Harkles' security (a claim he repeated several times in March and April). And Sean didn't care one bit. 🤣🤣🤣

Now, Sean says that Harry has claimed he doesn't remember. Harry can't say he doesn't remember!!!, because the idiot blurted out that it was a "tic-tac." In other words, he remembers the incident. And he remembers Griffiths. But the danger for Harry—and it seems his lawyers have already told him this—is that he’s better off ignoring the matter, because this won't be a case of "he said, she said," but rather "he said, she has evidence, and there are witnesses."

Yes, Sean says there are witnesses in Griffiths' favor.

Regarding the visa, Sean thinks the problem is that Harry doesn't remember any of the paperwork because he didn't handle it himself—someone else did—and right now, the matter doesn't concern him much because he has protection. By virtue of being Charles's son. For the time being—as long as Charles is alive.

But however you look at it, it’s a disgrace.

FAKERY EXPOSED- IS ANYTHING REAL WITH MARKLE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfblT5GCmsA

These words do go together:

Fake and Meghan Markle.

No one is surprised anymore by how closely linked those words are, because Claw lies and lies and lies.

Sean is already intrigued: does she do that without realizing it, or to stir up controversy? They aren't sure—sometimes it's one, sometimes the other. It's Clawland!!!!

Claw lives for publicity. She lives for it. And Claw is always smiling, always with the camera in front of her. Without the cameras, the mask slips. But in front of them, she smiles.

Sean says these images are real. Not good—real.

https://preview.redd.it/9si8jyypwfjh1.png?width=304&format=png&auto=webp&s=49897175a4115aa7ede6995e0fdf7ab4de0f2fc9

Sean says that seeing Claw dressed in a vest and rain boots in the summer is real. There is a reason for the clothes she wears in those videos. He doesn't say it's a good reason 🤣🤣 or that it makes sense to post a video of her dressed like that in the middle of summer. Claw is there to sell clothes—in that "360-degree turn" Martha mentioned: going from a third-rate influencer to a third-rate influencer.

It is not true that Lil'D is a budding Fellini.

https://preview.redd.it/wca3221xwfjh1.png?width=335&format=png&auto=webp&s=c00c6d21b4d739068fbe9671b7a0f08f8aca72ff

That was recorded with a camera on a tripod—something easy to deduce from the height of the image. It looks like the girl just pressed a button. A Montecito staff member told Sean that. And even so, it took about five takes 🤭

The photos are blatantly fake. In fact, the scoop came from a staff member who is on the verge of jumping out of a plane without a parachute. That person is reaching the end of their rope regarding the whole photo situation—because it’s endless, and every single one requires Photoshop or flipping the image; basically, it’s more work than a Marvel movie.

https://preview.redd.it/fvceevsnyfjh1.png?width=399&format=png&auto=webp&s=beaec0be4c2c2da7a40ea05232c9adce49f90a0f

They have that freelancer handling the digital Photoshop work. Claw doesn't do it herself; she brings someone in to make those adjustments because she knows the photos will be published and scrutinized in minute detail.

Michael Pavano really mocked that yesterday!

https://preview.redd.it/qutbun4dzfjh1.png?width=399&format=png&auto=webp&s=15c84d99873e9299023595ae3f036343c6bd99ff

Because all of that serves to distract attention from the real problems and negative stories.

Nothing is real in the world of Harkleland.

https://preview.redd.it/hu32mpbozfjh1.png?width=399&format=png&auto=webp&s=1ed8ecf6c7454cb7cdcf0e97d1405a90329b9efe

Not even these photos from Disneyland. They were all digitized, retouched, cropped...

Raise your hand if you are surprised.

...

...

...

Yes, I'm sitting here waiting. Does anyone want tea while we wait?

https://preview.redd.it/z0tck5060gjh1.png?width=556&format=png&auto=webp&s=0a468f26f557a4d2809977154e95727daec40ae7

WILLIAM KNEW & MARTHA TOO MARKLE PLAYS INTO THEIR HANDS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqopbhP40FE

William knew Claw was Claw from the very beginning. Sean recounted that during that infamous polo match—where Claw was dangling something we’ll call Archie, though we hope it wasn’t anything living—she was very eager to see what was going on in the trunk of William’s car.

https://preview.redd.it/qfmcrycs0gjh1.png?width=512&format=png&auto=webp&s=59552aca1ca330d52151d078b0a3c0fe8eb6f42e

To William, Claw is an opportunist. Claw was desperate for publicity, for being the center of attention.

To William, Claw is an opportunist. Claw craved publicity and loved being the center of attention. William noticed that Claw took short, dainty steps during her first Christmas walk because she wanted to capture the cameras' full attention.

https://preview.redd.it/9d9r03k71gjh1.png?width=1879&format=png&auto=webp&s=56fe34e332d2f0bbb1a9a34b12f43e07712db47e

She wanted to displace William and Kate; she wanted to be globally famous.

And she is famous... for the wrong reasons.

Now, the Foster incident has gone down in the record as "Claw, the woman who can't let go of the microphone." But the Stewart incident hasn't played out that way, because everyone believes Claw *did* speak about the meeting with the King, even though she knew full well she shouldn't have. And Claw knows that what Martha said was detrimental to Harry's aim of connecting with the King.

Neither of them would admit that the need to reconnect wouldn't have arisen if they hadn't both made terrible decisions. She drove a wedge between Harry and his family, though Sean maintains that this doesn't absolve Harry of anything. They are both bad people; they both handled things poorly.

And Claw knows that Martha wasn't confused at all. And the worst part is that she knows Charles and William are well aware that Martha is neither lying nor confused.

The real issue here isn't whether or not Harry reconciles with his father; Claw doesn't care about that. The problem is that nothing—absolutely nothing—validates the Sussex children's status as prince and princess. They appear that way on the royal website, but just as they appeared, they could disappear. There isn't a single photo of the King with those children. There is no photo of a reconciliation. And because of Martha Stewart, Charles is now deeply disappointed by how indiscreet the Harkles are.

Claw is angry with Martha because she knows no one will want to take her back in—even though she behaved herself... for half an hour. She claims she did nothing wrong. But that is not the King's opinion; to this day, he has not invited the Harkles to Balmoral, whereas it is known that Andrew will visit once the King is no longer there.

Now, the question is: will there be an invitation for Christmas?

Mind you, in the middle of the gossip, Sean says Claw liked Altorph and apparently *did* cosplay as Diana there. Sean says he doesn't have all the details yet, but that alone has me going, "Whaaaaat????"

https://preview.redd.it/04niltek4gjh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=cae366f687b8c37ad4679ec6f50e9bae4b31b3be

https://preview.redd.it/afxtjf0m4gjh1.png?width=1036&format=png&auto=webp&s=844b6ce26a02087920021af26933324fab9296f1

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 5 days ago

If you don't have anything good to say about anyone, come and sit next to me. (Alice Roosevelt Longworth, Neil Sean's gossip)

https://preview.redd.it/pgkdzjah68jh1.png?width=651&format=png&auto=webp&s=48a7f1e8a4caa7122690ebde158d4d2af7a90c72

Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884–1980) was the eldest daughter of U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt. Known as "Princess Alice," she was a popular and rebellious icon of the era, famous for her sharp wit, her influential political life in Washington, and her style that defied traditional social norms.

https://preview.redd.it/26qap08n68jh1.png?width=1328&format=png&auto=webp&s=ad9e1dd5d4ce8346b939adbd3fadea82d59e0fb4

DUCHESS & THE DUKE " COULD NOT STAND HER" THE STORY YOU DON'T KNOW"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cvw9MF9QkX0

Sean has always said that Prince Philip is one of his favorite royals. He is also a big fan of Princess Anne, as he shares that same style of dry, direct humor.

https://preview.redd.it/y68fr3b978jh1.png?width=596&format=png&auto=webp&s=107b8d6f13adce439557e1764db531f7e17cc6bf

Sean recounts that when he was working at The Goring Hotel, he met the Prince at an event—not as a reporter, but apparently while serving as a maître d' or something similar. He got into trouble for failing to secure a table for Michael Heseltine—Margaret Thatcher's then-Secretary of State—who, according to Sean, was particularly rude on that occasion, snapping, "Do you know who I am?" And Sean, being young, shot back: "That's irrelevant. I'm asking you: do you have a table booked?" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Someone at the hotel noticed that, and when Heseltine went to the bathroom, Sean almost got fired over it. 🤣🤣

Sean says there is a big difference between saying you "met" someone and actually knowing them. He notes that people often tell him, "Oh, you spent the day with the King," when he is reporting for certain channels. No, Sean makes it clear that you spend the day behind a barrier—you film something—but you don't have a Tête-à-tête (one-on-one conversation)

Some reporters don't make that distinction and speak as if they know the royals just because they went on a tour with them. Sean says it isn't glamorous at all—not even when they go on tours—because you have to stand for hours.

At that event, Sean had to step in for the master of ceremonies. This didn't worry him, as he was accustomed to being around crowds thanks to his family's background in theater; he was happy to help out the master of ceremonies, who was feeling unwell. Sean was wearing a red jacket over a white suit, and people remarked, "Oh, he's a theatrical"—a phrase he loves.

https://preview.redd.it/tsh2jpfmb8jh1.png?width=335&format=png&auto=webp&s=5068568f3d540173c04697bdd7027aca046f7b37

That is how he ended up serving as the master of ceremonies for the event, and that is how he came to have a long conversation with Philip.

Sean recalls that it was an event attended by various politicians but also by many figures from the entertainment world whom he already knew through his parents and grandfather—among them Michael Caine and Terence Stamp. Sean then had the task of introducing Philip, who gave a brief speech and, as is customary at such events, went around greeting the staff, showing great kindness.

One thing that always struck me about Philip was that he was always more direct and less accommodating—especially with political figures. He wasn't like that with ordinary people; he was always kind to them. But with politicians or journalists, Philip was sharp as a razor.

Sean was surprised that Philip had found out he had to step in for the master of ceremonies, but Philip congratulated him, and they talked about theater and such. And Philip advised Sean not to drop his Northern accent—since Sean had mentioned that those events required a more monotonous tone—and Sean was flattered that Philip encouraged him to keep his natural voice and was perceptive enough to notice it in the first place.

Years later, Sean performed before him and the Queen at various events.

Sean remembers that... and the fact that he saved the skin of the company organizing the event—which he was working for at the time—without getting paid extra 🤣🤣They didn't even give him a day off, yet later they wanted him to act as master of ceremonies at weddings and things like that. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

So, it’s not that Sean was friends with the Duke—he makes it clear he wasn't—but they did establish a cordial relationship whenever they saw each other. And as Sean has recounted, he also had a connection to Margaret through the theater world and got to know people from the Palace.

That is why Sean says he learned—from a very reliable, excellent source—how Philip felt about Claw.

Sean has never believed Claw’s claim that she didn’t know who the man standing next to the Queen was when Harry introduced his girlfriend to her. He never bought it, because it was impossible for Claw not to know it was the Duke of York, given that she was a "friend" of one of his daughters.

Sean has always thought that Harry is either blind or very stupid to believe something like that.

In this regard, Sean voices what he heard during those years, 2017–2018. The Queen simply wanted everything to go smoothly. Philip, too, wanted to avoid any backlash or problems. Yet both knew that wasn't going to happen, because things had been off-track from the very beginning.

As for Philip, "Claw" tried his patience very quickly. Sean recounts that during the third meeting between the Queen and Claw, Claw wanted to know what it was like meeting JFK and Jackie Kennedy when they visited the UK.

https://preview.redd.it/aef1nll9e8jh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=39659c55ab5df0b3852d4ff034ee86542294c07f

The Queen told Philip about it, and Philip found it very strange—after all, wasn't it an odd question for someone who supposedly knew nothing about the Royal Family?

That incident and others led Philip to give Claw the nickname "DoW." Claw didn't like it, so Harry went to speak to his grandfather... seriously, just how much of an idiot is Harry? A huge idiot! Because if I had a grandfather like that, there is no way in hell I’d go complaining to him.

Because Philip—with that sharp tongue he kept active until his very last day—apparently responded to Harry’s complaint by saying something like, "If she doesn't know anything about the Duchess of Windsor... well, it’s just a nickname, you know? Another American in the family."

Claw had met her match—a bone she couldn't chew—because she later found out Philip had said, "One dates actresses, but one doesn't marry them."

Claw was furious. And all the more so because... seriously, seriously Mr. Sean? I can hardly believe it, but Sean says he knows it from a very reliable source, a former Palace employee of Claw’s: Claw was annoyed by the way Philip treated her, because she didn't hold him in very high regard.

https://preview.redd.it/oudy1h84g8jh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=300eb52b2511773c440a4463a9d4f038d0b2e388

That marked Claw’s nosedive. Because Philip—who possessed an instinct for reading people—simply decided that Claw didn’t exist for him; a trait that, unfortunately for Claw, William had inherited. He just torpedoed right through her.

And Claw knew it.

It came as no surprise to Philip that Claw chose the Rolls-Royce Wallis had used for her husband's funeral. Philip asked, "How does she know these things?" and Harry apparently told him she had researched the connections between prominent Americans and the British Royal Family—or something to that effect.

https://preview.redd.it/5gg62nc9h8jh1.png?width=200&format=png&auto=webp&s=7af1de36f99b1bd36852b64d490438ad5fb42af4

As if Philip would believe that.

The final nail in Claw's coffin was her alarming habit of taking photos. The staff was concerned but didn't dare speak up—except for Angela Kelly, who told her bluntly: "You can't do that." Claw then set out to undermine Kelly—after all, how dare a mere servant treat her that way?—but Sean says Kelly was the only staff member who laid down the rules for Claw loud and clear.

And it struck Philip as very odd that Claw wanted to take photos in the room Wallis had used during her husband's funeral.

https://preview.redd.it/q6sunwjji8jh1.png?width=683&format=png&auto=webp&s=55c804b51ece2cfa0586609c256d68d85eae64cd

That room was in Buckingham Palace. And Philip said it was strange that Claw—who knew nothing about the British Royal Family—knew those things.

So he concludes that Claw was going to cause trouble.

And Sean makes it clear that this wasn't something Philip merely "thought." It was something he said—and said in front of quite a few people, enough that Claw never stood the slightest chance of getting close to him.

Except when Claw showed too much interest in Wallis—though not in monarchs like Queen Victoria. And Philip didn't have an ounce of regard for Wallis. I think that was the only thing he and his mother-in-law agreed on. 🤭🤭🤭

We are talking about the months leading up to the wedding. The Queen gave Claw the benefit of the doubt, and Charles was delighted that Harry was getting married. Philip did neither; he disliked Claw and made no secret of it. Philip thought Claw was an attractive woman, but nothing more.

Harry turned against Philip over that. He believed Philip was sabotaging his chance at happiness.

So Philip was Claw's number one enemy. That explains a lot. It explains why Philip left Sandringham in January 2020—and made sure the press saw him leaving.

https://preview.redd.it/vp3axwiwk8jh1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=710b5ec8d8e73ca074585ab50b46211558111f05

Philip never spoke to Harry again. And if you notice, Harry has never mentioned his grandfather. Since he passed away in 2021—knowing that Harry had given that infamous interview to Oprah—Harry hasn't mentioned him once. It’s not a matter of remorse; it’s because Harry knows his grandfather held him in contempt, and he can't deal with that. Claw probably thinks she got the better of Philip, and that by refusing to use the Mountbatten-Windsor name, she is demonstrating her power over Harry. Philip is likely sneering at how absurd Claw is.

Wherever Philip is, he must be saying, "I told him so, but he wanted to be happy. Look how happy Harry is now."

https://preview.redd.it/1fsnekf0p8jh1.png?width=1380&format=png&auto=webp&s=313bd9cfa257ee8cba15a9eb9987a1badd0695c6

HARRY ONCE AGAIN PICKS UP THE TAB

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23Gvg4jDQYs

Sean says one thing you can say about Harry is that he's "a good boy."

Because "if you tell him what to do, pat him on the head, he'll do it."

https://preview.redd.it/6kwytvsep8jh1.png?width=498&format=png&auto=webp&s=234f8c32801efa34176beccbc3323a2df4675abb

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

That’s why William has had zero time for Claw from the very beginning—because he saw the manipulation she has engaged in with Harry right from the start.

And basically, Claw didn't just want a husband; she wanted a powerful husband—that’s why she married Trevor. And then she married Harry. And Harry was looking for a mother figure.

https://preview.redd.it/0phzyzenq8jh1.png?width=572&format=png&auto=webp&s=11b72a5ce47ef005ce2a0be88b23a38028aea824

Sean makes it clear to a certain segment of the press that they shouldn't underestimate him. After all, unlike various reporters, he has actually worked at events—he knows them from both the operational and organizational sides.

So, he knows this piece of gossip because he knows people who organize red-carpet events. And regarding the David Foster Foundation, the behind-the-scenes story is that Harry had to step in to save the day—but it’s not the way the press is telling it.

So, Sean is reaffirming what he said about the matter: the Fosters are not friends with the Harkles. And what infuriated Claw was that the whole business of Foster ignoring her was viewed in the same light as the incident with Sophie Chandauka—that is how people saw it on social media, as confirmation of what Chandauka had said. That made Claw furious. That is why she wanted a statement from Foster. Curiously enough, it was exactly the same thing that happened with Chandauka.

Claw is seen as a manipulator.

https://preview.redd.it/x431195os8jh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=adbf628fe5ba3d99690f4331a01268c220fea2b8

And say what you will, the images are clear: Claw wants to take control of an event that isn't hers. She wasn't even the special guest—her husband was. Yet there she is, taking charge of the situation as if she owned the stage.

https://preview.redd.it/nxv8ga5ts8jh1.png?width=306&format=png&auto=webp&s=0d3df33bfbb6dd162afd1879f11082adcc9fec17

And she has that stiff, half-smile because she always wears it when there’s a camera around.

Sean says Foster ignored Claw.

Harry pressured Foster to issue a statement on the matter. Foster did so in People magazine—a tabloid that will do whatever the Harkles say.

https://preview.redd.it/rzeb70vht8jh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=b7954afc3f52dc654e55644b4a2846e973adcc65

Why did Foster do it? Sean says it’s because he’s a good guy, but I don’t think he is—not by a long shot. But Sean adds that it was because he didn’t want to get dragged into a controversy. That, I do believe.

But this isn't going to break the streak of negativity. Because Harry had to step in and save the day—yet again. And that is what everyone sees, especially in Hollywood. Especially after seeing Claw hog the spotlight for that *Cookie Queens* documentary, even though the money invested came from Harry. In Hollywood, they see that Claw only uses Harry when it suits her; he is only useful when he's useful

HARRY WILL FIGHT WILLIAM RUTHLESSLY OVER THIS ONE REMAINING WISE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MThpmh86mQY

It was already difficult enough for Charles to deal with someone as challenging as Harry. Now, he has to contend not only with Harry but also with Claw, who shows absolutely no respect for the British Royal Family.

Claw has made this clear on many occasions—for instance, by mocking Kate’s behavior, which is more restrained because she is in the public eye. Or when she lied about Fergie teaching her how to curtsy, only to perform an extremely rude and mocking one on Netflix later on.

https://preview.redd.it/s5ajfa9tv8jh1.png?width=650&format=png&auto=webp&s=bc6aaf270b7755d0f318678bad21f5b0acad5ca1

Claw was mocking the Queen—who, fortunately, had already passed away by the time that infamous documentary aired. And Harry knew it; he knew what Claw was doing. That is why there was a flash of annoyance—though nothing more than that—yet he never stopped it, and Claw allowed it to remain in the documentary.

Sean says that Claw's intention was for the Queen to see it, so that she would know that, to Claw, she was merely Harry's "grandmother"—and not the most famous monarch since Queen Victoria and Queen Elizabeth I.

Now the Harkles are desperate to regain their place within the British Royal Family—a position they had previously walked away from. One of the things Harry wants most is 24/7 security, a requirement he himself has made impossible to fulfill due to his travels.

However, William has realized that the Harkles have chosen to ignore everything they were supposed to avoid doing under the terms of the Sandringham Agreement. It is yet another slight against the Queen, given that the agreement itself was the result of a hard-fought battle.

The Harkles cannot use the HRH title. But Claw has made sure it is known that she uses it in private.

https://preview.redd.it/3st15pqmx8jh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=6e99658aec8cb3887f7748f2be40bcb86bb12974

Claw loves being called the Duchess of Sussex, and the fact that at some events people curtsy to her and call her Princess.

As for the Harkles, what they want regarding security is for the UK to pay for their protection wherever they happen to be—not just when they visit the UK, but anywhere in the world. And Sean says that if the government grants them that, it would ease the financial burden on the Harkles.

According to an excellent source, William believes the Harkles have achieved what they wanted: to profit from the titles they hold. They always use the excuse that "anything goes," because they refuse to accept being treated differently than Fergie—so she acts just as Fergie did. "Claw" won't accept one set of rules for some and another for others.

In fact, Claw isn't interested in being on the royal website, as it hasn't driven traffic to the Harkles' own sites.

And here, I think she has a point. The royal website redirects to https://sussex.com/about/, but that site is empty; in fact, it hasn't been updated in years. Because it still alludes to Harry and his relationship with Sentebale.

https://preview.redd.it/uxhwjtjgz8jh1.png?width=762&format=png&auto=webp&s=8480f63a1f1cb43048e79bdc2d547da817feb935

In other words, if the Royal webpage isn't modified, then what good is it to Claw?

But as far as William is concerned, the Harkles got what they wanted: to profit from their titles. And the only thing left is for the government to pay for their security. The Harkles believe they’ll eventually get that, too. I doubt it.

MARKLE MEGA FLOP BUT FAR WORSE NOW BEHIND THE SCENES ALL KICKING OFF

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmugoFOlvKc

The documentary Cookie Queens, executive-produced by Harry and Claw, made $327,797 from 446 screens during its August 2026 opening weekend. It was outperformed at the U.S. box office by CatVideoFest 2026, a compilation of internet cat videos that grossed over $568,000 on fewer screens

https://preview.redd.it/83y6e7zg19jh1.png?width=1206&format=png&auto=webp&s=e9ee60c203cc75f7d174e553c40962cc06beb87f

And that is becoming a topic of conversation in Hollywood.

Especially because, how much money have the Harkles lost on Cookie Queens? Nothing. They didn't lose any money because they didn't put any money in.

And how unpleasant it was when Claw took the mic to promote the movie, only to make it all about herself. Always "Me, Me, Me."

And that is why the topic of conversation is that this documentary is one of the biggest failures in the history of cinema.

And the question is: would this documentary have worked better without Harry—and above all, without Claw? No one knows, but what is known is that they didn't put up a single cent yet are doing the promotion; Claw is doing it purely to show off, and it’s annoying when someone claims the glory without having contributed anything.

Sean says the Harkles had to do promotional work in exchange for a share of the profits—that is, if the film actually made money and recouped its costs. That isn't going to happen.

But then again, it’s not all bad for the Harkles, right? They didn't put up any money, so they didn't lose any. No, they didn't lose money. It’s worse: they’re coming across as incredibly toxic people. I mean, it’s a documentary about Girl Scouts. There are girls who would want to watch it. But that’s not how it’s playing out. And a lot of people are blaming the Harkles.

And the producers of *Close Personal Friends*—the movie in which Claw made a cameo—are concerned. They want to make money, and they don't see that happening if Claw is involved.

https://preview.redd.it/7eo9ex6859jh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=bd222f0e6bf3cde8a7a2f0299175b1e2533b93eb

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 6 days ago

RICHARD EDEN: The two telling details in my colleague's '10 years of Meghan' piece... and its painful reopening of old wounds for the 'Sussex Survivor Squad' (Daily Mail)

Neil Sean had already warned that the *Daily Mail* was going to target the Harkles by reviving the workplace bullying issue—especially since there were many people eager to share their experiences.

And sure enough: Eden shares some details about it.

https://www.dailymail.com/columnists/article-16049601/EDEN-Sarah-Vines-Meghan-LA-Sussex.html

https://archive.ph/Eou5M

To mark the Duchess of Sussex’s 45th birthday last week, my esteemed colleague Sarah Vine wrote a fascinating profile of her for The Mail on Sunday’s You magazine.

For me, the most revealing detail about the American actress who married Prince Harry came at the end of the article.

Well-connected Vine wrote: ‘If someone displeases her, they sure know about it. I was once told – this time by a friend with contacts in the Royal Household – that one day the Duchess was interviewing for staff.

‘A young girl – a perfectly harmless and nervous Sloane in her early 20s – was ushered into her presence. Meghan was sitting at her desk, reading some papers.

‘For what seemed like an eternity, she kept her eyes down, ignoring the girl completely. Then she glanced up, examined her, then went back to her work. “You can leave,” she said. And that was that.’

And in another revelation in last week's piece, Sarah Vine tells of an instance, in 2015, when Meghan berated staff at Soho House Istanbul about some kind of problem in her room, after being invited to the hotel's opening weekend.

This first anecdote may have brought back painful memories of the ‘Sussex Survivor Squad’ – that’s the nickname used by those who worked for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex since Meghan married into the Royal Family.

Some dislike talking about even their brief professional relationship with Meghan because it brings with it unwelcome flashbacks. Being ignored, as was apparently the case with the job applicant mentioned by Vine, was just one of the hazards of working for the former star of television legal drama Suits.

That was, however, a minor risk compared with other unpleasant aspects of working with the Sussexes.

Palace officials announced in 2021 that they were holding an inquiry into claims Meghan’s ‘belittling’ behaviour drove two female personal assistants out of the household and ‘undermined the confidence’ of a third.

Staff were said to have been left in tears and feeling ‘traumatised’ – some likening their condition to having post-traumatic stress. The Royal Household hired a third-party law firm to probe the claims.

The first sign that the Duke and Duchess might have trouble holding on to staff came in 2018 when I received a tip that Meghan’s personal assistant, Melissa Toubati, had quit suddenly, six months after the actress had made Harry her second husband.

‘It’s a real shock,’ a source said. ‘Why would she want to leave such a prestigious job so soon?’

Officials usually decline to discuss staffing matters, so I was taken aback when a senior Palace source paid tribute publicly: ‘Melissa is a hugely talented person. She played a pivotal role in the success of the royal wedding and will be missed by everyone in the Royal Household.’

This suggested Melissa’s colleagues were not happy with her departure. The fact she left so soon raised questions about her reasons.

It later emerged that Jason Knauf, the Sussexes’ communications secretary, had written to Simon Case, Prince William’s private secretary, in 2018 to say: ‘I am very concerned that the Duchess was able to bully two PAs out of the household in the past year. The treatment of X was totally unacceptable.

‘The Duchess seems intent on having someone in her sights. She is bullying Y and seeking to undermine her confidence. We have had report after report from people who have witnessed unacceptable behaviour towards Y.’

Melissa’s departure proved to be the first of many from Harry and Meghan’s staff in years to follow.

Palace aides admitted in 2022 that a report into alleged bullying by the Duchess had effectively been buried, the findings would never be made public. Even those involved were not told the outcome.

Officials would confirm only that the exercise had concluded and ‘recommendations on our policy and procedures’ had been made.

The allegations have always been strongly denied by the Duchess, whose lawyers described them as a ‘calculated smear campaign’.

A spokesman added: ‘The Duchess is saddened by this latest attack on her character, particularly as someone who has been the target of bullying herself and is deeply committed to supporting those who have experienced pain and trauma.’

What’s interesting is that Harry and Meghan have never publicly urged the Palace to publish the report. Surely, if they want to have no further staff recruitment problems, they should do so as a matter of urgency?

https://preview.redd.it/fkcr83mxk5jh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=8c35ff5f3931e936a2d9b2706e785f5917e448ec

That’s the problem with skeletons in the closet. There aren't any closets big enough to keep them all inside.

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 7 days ago

“Men only accept change out of necessity and only see necessity during crises.” (Jean Monnet, Neil Sean's gossip)

I was a little tired yesterday, so I left the post unfinished, but I've finished it now.

BLUBBERING WRECK - HARRY NEEDS HELP & FAST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzKYjrK3BEk

Things are as unstable for Harry.

Here we go again with the "I'm not being cruel" 😈😈😈... right after dropping the line, "It seems to me he doesn't have a healthy mindset."

And Sean believes that the blow Harry suffered with the ruling in favor of the ANL is far worse than any other problem he has faced before. Because Harry has been humiliated, and no one has come to his defense.

That is why, for him, watching the video of Paul Dacre—a video Sherborne has strongly urged him to watch—is impossible. After all, how could the Daily Mail challenge him? He beat the Mirror (not true), he beat The Sun (that wasn't true either); how is it that he lost to the Daily Mail?

And Dacre drove the dagger in up to the hilt, not only with that great line, "There isn’t a laundry in the cosmos big enough to wash all the dirty linen he has aired about his own family," but also by noting: "The bitter irony is that his mother, Diana, liked the Mail. We were her paper. We took her side in her acrimonious break-up with Charles. She and I would speak and meet. The Mail’s superb royal reporter was her friend and confidante." Dacre knew Diana far better than Harry himself did, and that is something Harry—as always—knows to be true, yet cannot bear to acknowledge.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/07/07/the-mail-court-victory-complete-vindication-of-free-press/?recomm_id=fade06de-f808-47c7-a6e4-603b7d7dd3b8

https://preview.redd.it/luflryx185jh1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=1bfd64a5a57da0620d2557a5b8f41131ad069c0e

Claw, on the other hand, views the whole situation as a problem—believing the entire mess is Harry's fault. Yet, she fails to see just how deeply affected Harry is. She is particularly blind to this, given that she doesn't even realize Netflix fired her. No, she didn't part ways with Netflix; Netflix parted ways with her. Claw twisted the narrative in her own mind, so she doesn't see things as they really are. That is why she cannot truly grasp how badly Harry is struggling. She could use this to emotionally blackmail the King, but she doesn't actually realize that, rendering her incapable of supporting him. Claw is a narcissist; empathy simply isn't in her vocabulary.

So, what happened behind the scenes at the David Foster Foundation event shouldn't come as a surprise.

Harry went to that event because he had no choice. There was no way around it: Claw wanted to go, so Harry had to go too—otherwise, Claw wouldn't have been allowed in.

Then Sydnie Christmas appeared—and as Sean points out, let's not pretend she just came out of nowhere to win the 2024 season of Britain's Got Talent; she already had a career before that. Anyway, she sang a song about overcoming hardships, Tomorrow. And Sean says that Harry burst into tears and then he hugged her, moved.

https://preview.redd.it/y6h3620u75jh1.png?width=676&format=png&auto=webp&s=b68093762f93734ab490cd6b37e70da748feaf2d

Let’s be clear: Sean isn’t saying "poor Harry," but rather pointing out that Harry is once again using that tactic in public. He had already pulled the same stunt at Chatham House on July 7th—which is how he secured the meeting with the King. Now, Harry is doing it again—crying in public—hoping word gets out and King Charles III is moved enough to help him.

The person talking about that is Sydnie Christmas herself. Because Claw didn't even notice. Because it’s not about her. ( https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/prince-harry-canada-bgt-winner-37535849?int_source=nba )

And that also explains Harry's connection with David Foster. Harry feels a connection with older people who can protect and help him.

Harry, my dear, you are 42 years old!!!

Ultimately, Sean is well aware that Harry is trying to elicit pity, but that doesn't change the fact that he really does have problems and is constantly on the verge of a breakdown. The fact that this is his own fault—a consequence of both his actions and his substance use—doesn't alter the reality that Harry is in a bad way; he is sick. And he is married to a woman who cares only about herself and no one else.

MARKLE STEAMS BUT CAN HARRY SAVE THIS YET AGAIN¿ MUST BE EXHAUSTED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UnVC5z9aPs

https://preview.redd.it/tdxa2zb975jh1.png?width=597&format=png&auto=webp&s=26e54982bbc464c135ebad6db3cc66978dfcceb7

Claw lives on social media. Sean confirms this, even though Claw claims, "No, it’s white noise; I don’t read anything people say about me." That’s a lie.

But Claw isn't the only one when it comes to lying and not doing things the right way. Because the British presenter Holly Willoughby is failed in her YouTube channel, it is crashing and burning. That’s because she did exactly what Sean predicted she would: she brought the same TV-style approach to YouTube—and that just doesn't work. But the worst part is that, instead of taking responsibility, Willoughby now claims she knew nothing about things like thumbnails or click-through rates. Sean says he gets it—she came from a TV background—but why didn't she do her homework? Her channel didn't launch overnight; why didn't she take into account what that actually entailed?

Claw was paying close attention to what Holly Willoughby was doing, in order to imitate her.

And in both cases, the problem is the same: refusing to seek guidance or listen to advice. Claw squandered the team she once had, and now she can no longer hire truly experienced people. But even if she did have them, Claw would simply remain her usual self—as she is demonstrating with that absurd controversy involving Martha Stewart. Who told Claw she could go toe-to-toe with Martha? Oh, right—the director inside her own head.

And Claw is the type who throws the stone—not that she hides her hand, but rather she throws the stone and puts her husband out front to take the blows in return. Because here we go again: Harry has to step up to defend Claw.

And not just with the Martha situation, but with what’s happening with the David Foster event.

https://preview.redd.it/l8nnc19j55jh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=72c3de4b7c4b80e7f82b2477b1317bbcdf586d89

This image makes the problem clear: Foster needed free publicity, and she got it by inviting Harry to the event. The royal-for-hire. Claw was just an add-on. There is nothing more to it; Harry is there because he is KC3’s son—that’s the deal.

Claw doesn't care how Harry is doing. But she is furious that the image of David Foster ignoring her has gone viral. Now, the official story is that he didn't see her. Sean says, "It was just the three of them on the carpet—what exactly didn't you see?" 🤣🤣🤣

But the official version is that he didn't see her. However, that version was put out by Claw's team.

And she released it on Sunday because she had expected that, after the images went viral, Foster would come out and say, "No, we're best friends; there's no problem." Foster didn't do that. She wanted a definitive response, but that didn't happen on Saturday. So, she took action on Sunday—even sending an article about it to People magazine.

Which only makes matters worse, because every invitation extended to the Harkles ends in controversy. Every single one.

And until yesterday, Foster's silence was deafening. However, following Harry’s complaint—prompted by the fact that he had to step in and ask Foster to speak on behalf of his wife—Foster issued a statement to People magazine: "As the host of the David Foster and Friends Foundation event, I had already greeted our friends, the Duke and Duchess, at the entrance ten minutes before the red-carpet encounter."

"Both of them, with great kindness and generosity, gave their time and made a real effort to interact with everyone. Harry and Meghan are very good friends of mine. Anyone who witnessed it can confirm that there was no awkward moment and, certainly, no snub."

“It’s sad that certain media chose to deceive a red carpet encounter for clickbait. They turned simple ‘positioning’ to get the best photo into a hurtful lie.” ( https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/meghan-markle-david-foster-snub-37546948 )

That wasn't true; it wasn't the media. It was people on social media who commented on that matter.

But the fact is that the incident occurred on Friday the 7th, and Claw was expecting a reply from David Foster on Saturday. It didn't arrive until August 13th—almost a week later—and not in Claw's defense, but at Harry's insistence.

No one has defended Claw. No one wants to. And fewer and fewer people want to invite the Harkles, because everything always ends in controversy.

https://preview.redd.it/nsbj5f0ma5jh1.png?width=597&format=png&auto=webp&s=f255db50e501f8a8e8435f39a419aed4c94dd662

RAINE DIANA DODI & ME THE SECRETS YOU DON'T KNOW

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=886DwBOx4fs

Sean recounted on last Saturday's By Royal that he met both Dodi and Raine, Diana's stepmother, because in 1996, Al Fayed had bought a radio station.

In May 1996, Mohamed Al-Fayed bought the struggling London-based women's radio station Viva! Radio (Viva 963) for £3 million. He soon renamed the station Liberty Radio as part of an effort to build a media presence in the UK alongside his relaunch of Punch magazine.

https://preview.redd.it/7gwtvhozg5jh1.png?width=686&format=png&auto=webp&s=702beb3097ae7c40af46d3e3baa35040061a4cd3

Sean mentioned that he would run into Raine at Harrods—in the dining room and elsewhere—because she worked for Al Fayed. Al Fayed hired Raine in the 1990s as an executive for the luxury department store Harrods, serving as international director and public relations executive—a role suggested in part by Diana herself.

So, since that attracted a lot of attention, Sean released a short "By Royal" piece telling that story.

Sean said he always regretted that Raine was misunderstood, as she was a very funny woman—though she had a biting sense of humor. It was the same type of humor Diana had. Sean notes that he began working at the radio station Al Fayed had purchased... He does not intend to go into the details regarding the various allegations of sexual harassment, making it clear that the video is not about that.

So, Sean recounts how Al Fayed bought Radio Viva, a station run by women and featuring female broadcasters, among other things. Sean said he had appeared as a guest on the station—Viva—because he was working in the record industry at the time and would share gossip from that field. When Al Fayed bought the station and rebranded it as Liberty Radio, he hired him. This worked out well for Sean, as he also had a history with Harrods; back when he was taking on temporary acting jobs, he had worked there as a sales assistant—in the clothing department, not the music section (though that’s where he’d wanted to be), and also in the department selling teapots and toasters.

And Sean says he’d been behind that counter for about three days when a lady told him he looked bored and like he didn't want to be there—so Sean said, "Well, yeah," and just left. So, when Al Fayed hired him for Liberty, he didn't mention that he’d worked at Harrods 🤣🤣🤣🤣

https://preview.redd.it/7mmq1p88i5jh1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=88e19aaf0cc0fe34f0dc99accc79a0116092b7f9

So Al Fayed hired Sean, whose job was to interview people shopping at Harrods about their purchases and so on. Sean would walk around the store, seeing many famous people.

And that is how he met Raine, who also spoke with the clients. And that is how they met each other.

Sean and she chatted over coffee and tea, and Sean says it was a really pleasant experience; she even asked him where he bought his ties. At the time, Sean used to buy them at charity shops because they were high-quality and inexpensive, but Raine offered to pick some out for him at Harrods, and she ended up buying him five. Sean says he no longer has them, as they eventually wore out or got lost. Later, when he returned to the store for work, Raine asked why he wasn't wearing one of the ties she had bought; realizing she was very observant, Sean made sure to wear those ties whenever he had to go to Harrods.

Then one day, Raine was talking to Diana on the phone. Sean had met Diana before, but Raine played a key role in bringing them closer; she told Diana she was with someone very charming and wanted her to say hello, so she handed the phone over, and Sean spoke with Diana.

Sean makes it clear that Raine and Diana had their conflicts, but that things improved significantly over time. Raine made it clear to Sean that she supported Diana and what she said in Morton's book.

https://preview.redd.it/4tb6zs8me5jh1.png?width=251&format=png&auto=webp&s=a01e684ec18c7966ae2219a47d299e438f8435e9

Raine told Sean that of all the books written about Diana, Morton’s was the only one she wanted it made clear truly reflected her own words. Let us recall that Diana lied when the Palace asked her directly if she had collaborated with Morton; she said no. The Palace knew she had lied but chose not to take action against her.

Raine said she was proud of Diana, without any negativity whatsoever.

Now, Sean points out that there is a difference between Diana considering that book her definitive biography and the contents of the book actually being entirely true. They are not; Sean makes it clear that much of the material represented Diana’s version of events—her point of view—rather than the objective truth. This became evident years later during the infamous Bashir interview.

So, when reading Morton's book, you have to take it with a grain of salt.

What was Raine like? Brilliant, intelligent, funny, and captivating.

https://preview.redd.it/a1dq5n0lf5jh1.png?width=387&format=png&auto=webp&s=20847e5d68a1f78357f614b1c7f81fe1f7b41d9b

And since Raine liked Sean, she introduced him to her mother, Barbara Cartland. Sean mentioned on *By Royal* that Raine maintained her mother's style—especially her hairstyle 🤭. Back then, Sean used to wonder why she didn't change her hairstyle. But now he understands that it was her signature look and that if she changed it, people wouldn't recognize her.

For those who do not know, Barbara Cartland was an extremely famous writer who, over the course of her nearly hundred-year life, wrote more than 700 romance novels.

https://preview.redd.it/iowxzuu4g5jh1.png?width=597&format=png&auto=webp&s=06a4f41ed1548096b23475e87927b8cc849c7a4a

If you want to start with a novel, try *The Bored Bridegroom*. Considered a fan favorite, the story follows young Lucretia Hedley, who is set to marry the handsome Marquess of Merlyncourt—England’s most eligible bachelor. Fearing he will grow bored with her innocence, she decides to transform herself into a worldly, sophisticated woman, a move that plunges them both into a dangerous intrigue.

Yes, these novels follow a simple formula: girl meets boy, they fall in love, and there’s a happy ending. Bravo! But Barbara’s style was always very engaging, and the story flows beautifully, making for a very enjoyable read.

Raine and Barbara told Sean that if he was going to write about something, he should write about what he knows, because it makes it easier. And it was Raine who arranged a meeting for Sean with an editor so he could write women's fiction under a pseudonym—something very common in those years. That didn't happen with Sean, as he pursued a different path, but he always appreciated Raine's gesture.

Raine was frowned upon for working for Al Fayed after what happened with Diana, but she had no issues with the British Royal Family; she needed a job and loved the work because she didn't want to be alone. Sean says Raine used to remark that one could live in a castle, but ultimately, it was just one empty room after another.

Sean says he met Dodi while he was working at Liberty Radio, because the station's offices were located across from Harrods. He doesn't remember that part very clearly, though, because he was young and just there to do his job. Now he thinks he should have been more observant, because that was where he met people like Cher, Michael Jackson, Julia Roberts, and Richard Gere—and he actually spoke with all of them.

https://preview.redd.it/swkykki5i5jh1.png?width=183&format=png&auto=webp&s=d989b0a4330fd8f2b561080006dcb780e9f26ce9

So, by the time Sean was doing interviews, it turned out he had already spoken with those people before; in fact, that’s how he was able to have a more fluid conversation with Diana—he reminded her that they had spoken on the phone through Raine, and she remembered it.

And that is why Sean says he knows a lot of people—really, a lot of people.

https://preview.redd.it/op40ko50j5jh1.png?width=1148&format=png&auto=webp&s=82b883fc789f670237306a176ed38c7a43db8c43

And they'll probably charge for the eclipse, too 🤭🤭

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 7 days ago

Tolerance and patience are far deeper and more effective than mere indifference. (Dalai Lama, Neil Sean's gossip)

That is what King Charles believes. That is why he displays those attitudes toward Harry that bother so many people so much—that bother *us*; I’m joining the club.

I think it is time for the King to learn that patience has a limit... and its name is dignity. For enduring is not always a virtue; sometimes, it is a forgetting of oneself. Learning to stop is not surrendering; it is respecting oneself.

IS THE KING SECRETLY PROTECTING HARRY OVER THIS DRAMA?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwaxjX1mSPI

A recurring question, given Charles's past actions.

Yes, Charles was very protective of Harry in the past; he chose to overlook things Harry was doing wrong. Let any father who hasn't done the same cast the first stone. Charles made that mistake.

But has Charles done that now? No. Because Charles sees—and is fully aware—that Harry wants to sink himself. He wants to do it. And Charles did everything to prevent it, without Harry realizing that that is what Charles has been trying to do.

So no, Charles hasn't lifted a finger regarding Harry's visa. Actually, that’s not entirely true; Charles did do something—and there is legal evidence of it: once he became king, he ordered that all of Harry’s documents, belongings, and clothes be sent to Montecito. The Palace informed Justice Fancourt of this in 2023 during the case against The Sun.

That is a matter for Harry, the US government, and the UK government. In other words, the ones who need to clarify the situation are Biden, Trudeau, Trump, and Boris Johnson. Harry holds a passport—one not issued by the Palace—and for years, the visa application process has been handled by Harry himself through consulates or embassies.

Any proof of that?

You have it: Charles found out about certain trips Harry took to Ukraine or Colombia through the press. If the Palace handled that documentation, the Palace would know about those trips. Does Harry want the Palace to know? No.

That is why Harry is angry with Charles—because Charles has let Harry hang himself with his own problems. But as Sean says, Harry is ungrateful; after all, were it not for the simple fact of being Charles's son, he would have none of what he has now.

And Harry is so ungrateful that even when Charles has extended a hand to him, he spits on it and continues his attacks.

https://preview.redd.it/s6onwjsjnuih1.jpg?width=512&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d102b912f0fccece2a4da3579ab65c2132f03ffe

That’s why, when Paul Dacre—or now Sean, in this video—treats him like a "petulant child," they aren't doing it in a "oh, poor little kid" sort of way, but rather thinking, "God, this moron still acts like he’s three years old."

Harry only wants Charles around when Charles does what he wants. When Charles doesn't, Harry spouts outrageous things—and he does so because he suddenly takes an interest in giving interviews to accuse Charles.

And after all that, Harry wants his children to see their wealthy grandfather, the King. Out of pure affection

https://preview.redd.it/pf9rtc6fnuih1.png?width=254&format=png&auto=webp&s=0f9ef5e3ef4951c15d822a5606347f10a93717d8

That said, based on what Sean points out, I am increasingly convinced that Harry’s major trauma wasn't about Diana—it was about Chelsy. Throughout all the years of his legal battles against the press, Chelsy was the one thing we heard about most. Harry rarely mentioned his wife, and only occasionally played the "Diana card," but Chelsy was the recurring theme. Harry is convinced that, were it not for the press, he would have married Chelsy. Sean has already made it clear in previous videos that this was never the actual issue. He reiterated this point recently: yesterday, Sean was discussing Harry’s plans to turn Buckingham Palace into a nightclub. Sean mentioned hearing that rumor back in the 2000s, but Chelsy had to live through it firsthand—and that was one of the many reasons she ultimately broke up with Harry.

Chelsy lost patience with Harry. Cressida did too. A long list of women did. William lost patience with Harry. Kate did as well; the Queen lost hers too. Philip stopped speaking to Harry, perhaps as early as late 2019. And the list goes on.

Only two people still have any patience left for him: Charles and Trump. And Trump is being tolerant of Harry out of regard for Charles.

Sean mentioned that in another video about the visa, citing his political sources in the US. Trump doesn't have an ounce of regard for the Claw. But as for Harry... hmm, it’s not that he likes him—he actually holds him in contempt—but he does appreciate Charles, Camilla, William, and Kate; so, as long as he can, he’ll keep the guy in the US... much to the misfortune of Californians.

https://preview.redd.it/hvbcpmngnuih1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=f46592a16a2e1ef68d04f5ada3ffa2953a0729b2

So, the decision to withhold Harry's visa documents was Trump's decision. It was not a request made by Charles. And let’s be very clear here: even if Charles had wanted to ask for something like that—and even if he had wanted to make such a request privately, just between himself and Trump—it would have been impossible in practice. Because the Heritage Foundation has not backed down in its demand to see what Harry disclosed on his visa application; consequently, sooner or later, if Charles had said anything, it would have inevitably come to light.

Why? Because even though it might seem like a minor matter, it remains an issue between states—between allies, actually—and Harry’s situation could be the source of many greater problems. It is a relief for me not to have to get into politics, but I have mentioned before that if Harry held a diplomatic visa, it would be a huge scandal. So Charles, playing a game of chess, has kept his mouth firmly shut, and Trump has made a complicated decision. And perhaps Trump views keeping Harry in the U.S. as a gesture toward his ally, the UK. The fact is that Trump made that decision without any intervention from Charles.

However, Harry doesn't realize he ought to be grateful. Because—let’s be clear—the documents are being withheld... for now. But does that mean it’s forever? No, it’s "for now." For this year, at least; there’s no telling what will happen next year.

But Harry doesn't realize how lucky he is. Perhaps someday he will, but as always, it will be too late.

https://preview.redd.it/8l34731inuih1.png?width=1041&format=png&auto=webp&s=f7bf655f2b84eafa8255cd72a1dd6b4e8c489cae

I WARNED YOU MARKLE - NEW MAIL DRAMA SET TO EXPLODE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0n3Ia_Dpmc0

Bit by bit, Sarah Vine’s article—in which she recounted how "lovely" Claw was in Istanbul in 2015 (yes, sarcasm; read the article: https://www.dailymail.com/lifestyle/article-16026991/For-mistakes-dont-think-fair-hold-Meghan-solely-responsible-shambles-followed-SARAH-VINE-Harry-Meghans-decade-drama.html )

Sean had already said—last year and especially at the start of 2026—that the Daily Mail was keeping some cards up its sleeve to play against the Harkles, and that it intended to use them, because it wanted blood.

Well, the story about the pill by Charlotte Griffiths was pure, malicious spite. And the *Mail* wasn't content with just plunging the dagger into Harry's gut once; it twisted the knife by republishing the story. So, anyone who didn't read it on Wednesday, July 8th, ended up reading it a couple of days ago.

And then there was Sarah Vine's story about "Claw" being totally rude and demanding a more generously filled gift bag.

Remember the girls' weekend in Australia—which was actually just a couple of hours? This was the gift bag Claw gave out.

https://preview.redd.it/hd4az6ppnuih1.png?width=590&format=png&auto=webp&s=f3d3864b0341a12b8b088fdbe67a399ecbc62019

At the end of the evening, attendees received canvas tote bags featuring the brand's logo, filled with a mix of wellness products and everyday items. Inside was a $21 tin of edible flowers from the As Ever, alongside a Tri-Peptide Lip Butter Glaze balm available at Coles. Claw’s own product line also made an appearance in the form of a leather bookmark inscribed with "Hold That Thought," which retails online for $28.

Sean had a friend at that event, and she told him that the kindest thing said about the matter was "stingy." 🤣🤣🤣

The *Mail* is moving a bit slowly on this, though, because they don't yet know how much the plaintiffs will have to pay—that will be revealed on Monday. But after that, the Harkles ought to be worried.

Because the press in general is out for the Harkles' blood. Sean says make no mistake: it’s one thing to give them coverage for the clicks, but quite another to actually like them. Aside from ITV, there isn't much love for the Harkles in those quarters.

Above all, the main source of anger is that the press was very kind to the Harkles from 2017–2018 through 2019. Then, things slowly began to turn against them. And now, looking at what happened with Martha Stewart, it is no longer just the British press; the US media is also turning against the Harkles. There is no interest in interviewing them—after all, what is the point if they are just going to lie?

https://preview.redd.it/ouwtevztnuih1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=5acec834394d98adaaf2f17d3bcd5a495a1a9bef

In case you don't know him, that is José José, a very famous Mexican singer-songwriter. And the lyrics go: 🎼"Lies, it's all lies / Things people say."🎼 It's from his song "40 y 20." ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a38-zNC1zJg )

Sean says the word in the U.S. press is that many outlets have grown fed up with the fact that Claw, in particular, says nothing and there is no real story there. There are controversies, sure, but a story? No. And besides, what Claw or Harry say are lies.

The Harkles see those stories and strike back—like what happened with Martha Stewart. But the *Daily Mail* situation is a "hot potato" that could burn Claw if she decides to open her mouth.

Because behind the Vine story lies the fact that Claw comes across as rude and a bully. Sean is letting it be implied that the *Mail* might go down that path—the path of revealing what happened with the "Sussex Survivors." Sean has already stated that the NDAs in their case have expired; the legal time limit has passed. And the *Mail* has been gradually dropping hints about it. The *Mail*, *The Sun*, the *Telegraph*... they all want to spill the beans on the Harkles, but they’re waiting until after August 17th. They aren't idiots; they aren't Harry.

https://preview.redd.it/w68xsc1xnuih1.png?width=1194&format=png&auto=webp&s=9b79e688b4ba455413651437c931b3fa708a86a7

As Sean recounted—and as it turned out, is indeed happening—people have reached out to those media outlets to share their stories. Take, for instance, the photographer who was at the Fiji market and saw an aide in tears. That rumor about a staff member crying was one of the first to circulate back in 2019 regarding the disaster that was that Australian tour. But Rebecca English eventually revealed that she had been there and witnessed the situation firsthand. Now, another person has also come forward as a witness. And Sean noted that there are even more people—some with sworn statements in hand—sharing their accounts.

Sean says the worst thing about Sarah Vine's article is that it came out in August—a month when celebrities and royals are off duty. So, the *Mail*'s malice lay in publishing it knowing it would find an audience. And it has. Now the issue is spreading to social media. "Claw" was a stalker before Harry, and she has been one since.

https://preview.redd.it/yxrj99t2ouih1.png?width=3464&format=png&auto=webp&s=4e68e7d9199b057a866097dfa0b394ef81378c0f

None of this is going away. In fact, things will come to light that the Harkles won't be happy about.

But it will make us happy, though. 😁

MARKLE VS MARTHA - GUESTS SPEAK YET KING CHARLES NOW GETS THE BLAME

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LciM3sSd1Y4

Claw is... ughhh! Exhausting. Because it’s not enough for her to try and pick a fight with Martha Stewart; now she’s trying to blame the King for the problem.

So, Claw was supposedly at a charity event where she ran into Martha Stewart, and at that event, Claw talked about her "vacation" in the UK and how she had just returned from the Palace. That’s what Martha said in an interview with *People* magazine, adding that Claw went from actress to princess to lifestyle guru. No, Martha isn't fond of Claw, but she’s much classier when she throws shade 🤭🤭.

Meanwhile, over at "Celebitchy," Kaiser reports that" the host/hostess of the dinner party went to People Magazine and also pushed back on Martha, saying: “I sat next to Meghan at the dinner party, and this account of what happened is simply untrue. Meghan didn’t talk about her European vacation other than to say the family had a great time. Meghan has always been a fan of Martha’s and enjoyed getting to meet her briefly at the dinner.” My interpretation of all of this is kind of different than most people. Like, I thought Martha was downright bragging about being in the same space as Meghan – Martha clearly couldn’t wait to gossip about it with People Mag, and she spilled her tea like a nosy busybody (which is what she is). Meghan would have shrugged it off, except that Martha included that bit about “I know she was talking about” her UK visit. Meghan has seen comments like this blow up a million times before, so her people pushed back quickly, and possibly even contacted the dinner party host and asked them to go to People. "

For those new here: Kaiser is someone—a cockroach (with apologies to cockroaches)—who worships Claw and Harry and spouts the most outrageous nonsense imaginable. He is the Bible of the Sussex Squad.

So, please excuse me for not posting the link to that comment. Even mentioning that specimen feels wrong to me, but I’m doing it so you have an idea of ​​the direction things are taking.

Kaiser refers to this article.

https://preview.redd.it/z38s9vq5nuih1.png?width=1129&format=png&auto=webp&s=b95c63f4e223f9f366a38062272d251699c1aa15

https://people.com/martha-stewarts-account-dinner-party-meghan-markle-is-simply-untrue-source-12036583

Note: Kaiser says "the host/hostess of the dinner party." No, *People* says "a source who hosted the event "

The funny thing is, we still don't know what event that was. 🤣🤣🤣

Sean states—not as gossip, but as fact—that at least two people have confirmed Claw was there and did indeed speak about the visit to the King. These are people Sean tracked down who were actually present. That is why I reiterate: do not underestimate Sean—he knows a lot of people.

That said, Sean points out that he isn't part of the Squad, so people shouldn't attack him; however, "in defense" of Claw, she didn't bring up the matter spontaneously—she was asked about it. In fact, he says that two specific people asked her.

But Sean—and forgive me, but he doesn't state this very clearly in order to protect his sources—points out that the question wasn't "So, how was your vacation in the UK?" because the answer would have been, "Oh, very good; I had a great time." The question was about the Highgrove meeting. And Sean says that Claw answered that question, but was dying to share details about the meeting.

Sean makes another interesting point: many of those present don't want to get involved in the matter. And they don't want to because Claw is toxic—and when someone is toxic, it's best to keep your distance.

Claw was desperate for it to be known that she had been with the King. So, she did speak about the matter.

The "gossip" Sean heard from the Montecito team is that Claw is furious about how the meeting turned out because she had a completely different idea of ​​how things would go. For starters, she thought there would be official photos.

Claw believes the King could have avoided all this backstabbing and rumor-mongering had he issued a statement clarifying that it was not a private visit, but rather that he was hosting the Duke and Duchess of Sussex at his private residence—describing it as a very pleasant visit, the details of which would remain private. That is what Claw believes Charles should have done.

https://preview.redd.it/06uibormpuih1.png?width=220&format=png&auto=webp&s=d4a7e574ba088e0f2e79c872674cdd98da3b09dc

The King stated that it was a private visit. And Claw is furious about it, because, on top of that, she had to see a certain photo displayed prominently.

https://preview.redd.it/diu9yhmxpuih1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=d342f4ca55fb8928926c4f45fa6643efde332cc6

Claw wanted a photo like that—with her, her children, and the King—published in all the media. And the King didn't give it to her. And strictly speaking, there isn't a single photo of the King with the Sussex children. Not a single photo that Claw can boast about or use.

What infuriates Claw the most is the fact that the King met with Harry and the children and then simply moved on. In other words, for the King, it was just another meeting—one of many. That is why she is angry, according to Sean’s sources: because it was as if the King had met with the stable hand. In fact, I think the King holds the stable hand in much higher regard, since he provides good service. Claw cannot understand why—after years of estrangement—that meeting involving her and the Sussex children is being so thoroughly ignored and undervalued.

https://preview.redd.it/8x6ec8zgruih1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=cc3fc8981c34464a7bd9c2af200683eca8a3b416

And of course, Claw isn't stupid; she knew she was invited to that event because people wanted to ask her that question. So, she spoke about that meeting.

Sean says he’s with William on this: meeting up with the Harkles was a bad idea. But if Claw thought it was going to be the Harkles' big return to the royal fold, it seems it wasn't. It was just a 47-minute meeting.

I still have one video left to do, but I'm leaving it for tomorrow because it's already late in Chile and I need to go to sleep.

https://preview.redd.it/qysq0uvjsuih1.png?width=409&format=png&auto=webp&s=35d1c8993e747fd8e4d75df707f662791cc19a48

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 8 days ago

And finally, they brought to Congress the supreme law—the famous, respected, untouchable Law of the Funnel. It was passed. Fine dining for the rich; garbage for the poor. (Pablo Neruda, Neil Sean´s gossip)

I don't know the English term for it. The "Law of the Funnel" refers to a double standard: narrow for you, wide for me.

Yesterday, Sean mentioned that he knows—through people at *People*—that the magazine didn't warn the Harkles that Martha was going to talk about Claw and what she had said at that private event. Harry is furious about it; how could *People* do that to them?

Perhaps Harry should remember this.

👇👇👇👇👇

HARRY & THE MAIL- TRIGGERED HE CAN’T BARE TO VIEW YET HER SECRETLY PLANNED THIS!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ypu2ZRWo7Z0

Sean notes that when Harry spoke to the BBC in 2025—after initially losing his lawsuit against the government regarding his security but before the appeal—he didn't bother to inform the Royal Family about the interview. Neither did the BBC.

https://preview.redd.it/fgw08ohfqmih1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=d3bae50ebecff2c309234b9b770fdef7f9691427

Sean previously recounted how he found out about the Oprah interview because they came to his shop to rent cameras. Harry hadn't informed the Royal Family back then, either.

Sean calls him a "spoiled brat." To be clear, Sean doesn't literally view him as a "child"; he has stated in several videos that it is time to remember Harry is 42 years old. When Sean uses that term in this video, he is highlighting that many people perceive Harry's actions as those of a "spoiled brat"—someone who believes "Pa" can fix everything.

Well, Sean—citing his government sources—says that Harry keeps pressing the Home Office to provide him with 24/7 security. He won't take "no" for an answer when it comes to getting what he wants. The absurd thing is that Harry fails to realize the refusals he’s received are his own fault. I mean, you complain that your life is at risk, yet you travel to British Columbia for some measly event?

Oh, the thing is, his problem is only in England... not Scotland, where he was on vacation. Not Portugal, not Australia. Just England—specifically, Fleet Street in London.

https://preview.redd.it/fkairnm3vmih1.png?width=824&format=png&auto=webp&s=352e2888ee5e15e45435aee8df2675cf856f9413

Harry is such a fool! He could easily go to that place, eat a meat pie, and go shave off his beard. I can recommend a good barber.

https://preview.redd.it/pqojcyk21nih1.png?width=1062&format=png&auto=webp&s=a808e6dda9e7fd3af090f7ae6bd5479219ffdbb5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZukfGuYBGyQ&t=1s

Everyone already knows that the whole thing is a spectacle—the motorcade, the blue lights. And it’s not just Sean; a lot of people see it: Harry realizes that if he’s given more security than William, he can keep demanding the same things William has. Because Harry wants everything William has. And especially with Markle whispering in his ear, "Why can't we have this? Why can't we have that?"

That said, among the many tantrums Harry has thrown in recent days is his reaction to his legal team's advice that he should watch Paul Dacre's video.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/07/07/the-mail-court-victory-complete-vindication-of-free-press/?recomm_id=fade06de-f808-47c7-a6e4-603b7d7dd3b8

Harry refuses to see him because it seems he doesn't want to hear anything other than that there won't be an appeal. Yes, it seems Harry wants to appeal. Sherborne is telling him, "Harry, do you understand that this isn't in your best interest?" No, he doesn't understand.

There’s only a week left to find out what will happen with that case and how much Harry will have to pay 🥳🥳🥳🥳. Meanwhile, Sean is bringing up the point that Harry ought to be worried, because back then he had some questionable associations with certain individuals. Here’s a detail: Sean has mentioned in various videos that he is friends with Ken Wharfe, Diana’s former bodyguard. So, this isn't just gossip; it’s what a witness from that era saw: Harry used to invite journalists to his parties when he was young. Harry had a reputation for being the "life of the party." And Harry had ideas for Buckingham Palace: he wanted to have his own party room there. The Queen put her foot—clad at the time in a stiletto heel 🤭🤭—firmly down to ensure that didn't happen.

So, it must have been very easy for ANL to find people willing to talk about Harry. Let's be honest: Dacre was nice to Harry back then—it was a bad idea for him to poke that scorpion, because it packs a lot of venom in its stinger.

And that is exactly what Harry did when he spouted the nonsense about Judge Nicklin being involved in a "whitewash" to favor ANL. Saying that was not only rude but also a terrible idea. Because he infuriated Dacre, who ended up releasing that video and pulling strings—using his considerable influence—to dig up stories about Harry and Claw. Did you read what Sarah Vine recounted? About how Claw was openly rude at Soho House Istanbul back in 2015? Harry also caused a great deal of annoyance within the courts.

And, of course, he angered Elton and the other plaintiffs. So, Harry's idea of ​​pursuing an appeal or presenting a united front in a video to say "this isn't the end" isn't going to happen. That’s why his legal team is telling him, "Just watch Dacre's video, for 🤬🤬🤬 sake." Sherbone does not want to risk what remains of his reputation any further for Harry's sake.

So, can you guess how Harry feels?

Oh, yes—he feels he has been treated unfairly.

https://preview.redd.it/dyy0983o1nih1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=dd69f7be25096edd17746aadc26daa7c6fe73bee

Harry supposedly believes the whole thing has been an injustice. Sean says it could have been much worse. I think it’s going to get worse; I have a feeling the *Daily Mail* is going to drop another big story the day after the costs hearing. But for now, Harry is more concerned with pretending that David Foster still tolerates him. It’s obvious that the person Foster can’t stand is Claw.

REVENGE -CUNNING PLAN RAMPS UP EVEN FURTHER MARKLE VS MARTHA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOyMkm06Cdo

This isn't even gossip.

Claw holds a terrible grudge, so she isn't going to forgive what Martha Stewart did.

And Martha is terrified of that.

https://preview.redd.it/4zzzyi5a3nih1.png?width=819&format=png&auto=webp&s=2376d97ee07e6b20bdbaa267456f8459c56968ef

It seems Claw thinks she won the round with that statement claiming Martha "got confused," simply because Martha hasn't responded.

Markle doesn't seem to grasp two things: 1) Martha isn't even remotely on the same level as Claw; Martha is at least five million rungs higher up the ladder. 2) *People* magazine is happy about this controversy—it’s benefited them—so they aren't going to spill the beans.

Claw believes she has defeated *People*. That is not the case. Claw cannot take on *People*—and that is an absolute truth. For let us never forget: *People* knows the names of the individuals who spoke about the infamous letter to Thomas Markle. *People* knows that story very well. It is not in Claw’s best interest to antagonize them.

Furthermore, Claw has already angered Vogue, Bloomberg, Vanity Fair, and Harper's Bazaar; that is why they reported that she introduced herself as the Duchess of Sussex to just one person.

For now, Claw wants to pretend everything is fine, so she was happy at the David Foster event.

https://preview.redd.it/wdrzt10k4nih1.png?width=360&format=png&auto=webp&s=934aaeddfb4d7dc045313be0417eaddacf99c6a2

As some "sinners" rightly pointed out, that foundation isn't exactly running smoothly and faces a lot of criticism. But Claw and Harry don't pay attention to those details. Meanwhile, Sean makes it clear that Harry was the guest, not Claw; Claw was just an add-on.

Sean points out that if Claw thought the matter was settled, she was mistaken. After all, what Martha said about her wasn't a lie. Martha said, “If you’re an actress, it’s hard to then transition to a princess and then from a princess into a homemaking guru on a television show. It doesn’t sort of follow. So go from there.” https://people.com/martha-stewart-recreates-1995-people-cover-bedford-farm-interview-exclusive-12033698?_gl=1*10oddy1*_ga*ODI3OTgyMzIyLjE3ODQ1OTgzMzQ.*_ga_DK3GDWHWJH*czE3ODY0MDg2NDYkbzIkZzAkdDE3ODY0MDg2NjEkajQ1JGwwJGgwJGRyQ2k3bUxXZDJfamNhZmhteDdKNFp3Z2VreFllT1NMZ0Vn

https://preview.redd.it/04zeq5ws5nih1.png?width=480&format=png&auto=webp&s=bf6a77b57c3e141a346de55a3df3ecdd2314f57a

Sean is right: Claw pulled a 360—from actress to duchess, and then back to actress.

That said, all this controversy has once again focused attention on just how successful Claw really is—and whether she’s truly on Martha’s level.

And Sean says he knows from an excellent source that Claw views this as an opportunity to... 🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁YESSSSS!! ...play the victim again.

https://preview.redd.it/enbtpkgu6nih1.png?width=350&format=png&auto=webp&s=81a0ec1afaf334b651fc386b6418cc9d4f717550

Because Claw intends to use the whole affair to say, "The thing is, my company stirs up a lot of envy; there’s a lot of negativity directed at me." I mean, poor Claw 😭 having to endure attacks from such powerful people as Trump or Martha Stewart. She’s just a woman trying to succeed in a new world and launch a business, only to face so much negativity.

Incidentally, that is a tactic Claw has always used; after all, *With Love* didn't fail because of her—it failed due to early issues caused by those pesky fires. And she didn't fail within the Royal Family; it was the envious William and Kate who undermined her.

I mean, she’s so incredibly famous that she doesn’t have to promote anything because people are dying to get their hands on her products. But at the same time, she’s so fragile and weak, and under attack by evil, powerful people.

Yes, a migraine again!! 😵😵😵

WILLIAM SEES RED AFTER MARKLE’S LATEST STUNT ONCE AGAIN HIGHLIGHTING HIS DEEP MISTRUST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQ11eC1GhOo

I often didn't understand how Neil Sean operates in his videos about the Harkles, either. If you watch just one video—like the first one I posted today—it gives the impression that Sean views Harry as a poor, helpless little boy. Of course, that isn't the case, so you might dismiss the rest of the gossip, thinking that’s how Sean sees him. But that’s not it; these videos are part of an ongoing story, and you have to follow them to understand Sean's actual take—and he doesn't view Harry as a helpless little boy.

The same misunderstanding would arise if one were to watch only the second video. That is because Sean focused specifically on Claw, creating the impression that he views Harry and Claw as separate entities. But that is not how he sees them. While some instances feature Harry more prominently and others focus on Claw, the two of them are a team—a malevolent one.

They play along with each other. Harry wanted to go to Africa, and Claw pretended to agree, while simultaneously complaining that the gift bag she received at certain events wasn't full enough.

If you haven't read Sarah Vine's article, it's a summary of what the Harkles have been like; it's a bit cloying in places—I suppose because it has quite the dramatic opening.

https://www.dailymail.com/lifestyle/article-16026991/For-mistakes-dont-think-fair-hold-Meghan-solely-responsible-shambles-followed-SARAH-VINE-Harry-Meghans-decade-drama.html

https://archive.ph/AXfa0

When Soho House in Istanbul opened its doors in April 2015, an old friend of mine was thrilled to be invited to the celebrations.

It was a glamorous weekend-long affair, attended by celebrities such as Eddie Redmayne, Jamie Dornan, Sophie Ellis-Bextor, Claudia Winkleman, Paloma Faith and more. There were lavish lunches and boat trips, and many of the invitees stayed in the new hotel, a beautifully restored palazzo.

My friend recalls that at one point he was in the lobby, when a very pretty American woman strode up to the front desk.

She proceeded to berate the staff about some kind of problem in her room. My friend couldn’t quite catch the details, but the general gist seemed to be that she was unhappy with the quality of her goodie bag, which she felt was insufficiently lavish in its largesse.

My friend remembers thinking, ‘Wow, it takes quite some chutzpah to complain about a free gift at a free weekend in a five-star hotel full of A-listers.’ At the time, he had no idea who the angry American was – nor, he recalls, did anyone else in his group.

A year later, he saw a photograph of Prince Harry’s new girlfriend, Meghan Markle, and recognised her immediately: the woman from Soho House Istanbul.

I’ve never forgotten that anecdote, because it always seemed to me that, given the way things turned out, it was pretty telling. In fact, in many ways it reflects Meghan’s attitude to the Royal Family as a whole: she was treated with generosity and kindness, offered all the trappings and the status – but somehow none of it was ever quite enough.

And if you think that was the only thing that happened—do you remember the incident before the wedding? Meghan Markle cancelled her stay at the luxury Jumeirah Carlton Tower hotel in London after seeing a live caged parrot that was part of the décor. Upon noticing the bird, she told her companion, "I can't stay here because of the parrot," checked out immediately, and went to another hotel. ( https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/meghan-markle-fur-clothing-opposition-beliefs-feminism-dorchester-latest-news-a8306831.html )

https://preview.redd.it/ibexxvgmanih1.png?width=750&format=png&auto=webp&s=199734a48440151abd0b3b1db37d2a4c8d3fce6b

Sean has been saying for a long time that Thomas ought to feel bad about the way he raised Claw—who doesn't exactly have much to be happy about, considering she picked up Chelsy Davy's leftovers. It’s clear by now that the great love of Harry’s life is Chelsy, not Claw. 🤭🤭

According to Sean, Harry and Claw are equally bad; they egg each other on to do evil.

https://preview.redd.it/bik09n9obnih1.png?width=586&format=png&auto=webp&s=3dc87cc699b9ffc19c0e4c12415b251d24eafcb2

William obviously doesn't trust our Chucky, let alone his Tiffany. And dealing with two people like them is unpleasant. After all, the "Tiffany from Montecito" made a big show of keeping a "low profile" while in the UK. But that wasn't true; she had paparazzi lined up for that meeting with the King—a plan that didn't work out because the Palace was on guard. But can you imagine having to be constantly on guard against those two little monsters?

And Sean is certain that our Chucky is fully aware of the arrangement his Tiffany has with the paparazzi—and that he allows it. In this regard, Sean doesn't view our Chucky as a victim, but rather as a co-conspirator.

Well, David Foster raised $14 million with the whole spectacle he put on. And although some Canadians kindly pointed out in yesterday's post that bagpipes are a common feature at such events in Canada, Sean notes that in Foster's case, Claw sank her sharp, battered claws in to play dress-up as royalty.

Whether that was actually the case or not, it seems William doesn't care, because he—supposedly—believes it *was* a case of playing dress-up. And it appears he mentioned this at a recent meeting; after all, how long are the Harkles going to keep doing this?

William sees it as a mockery, as belittling the monarchy. And if that is how William sees it, I agree with him.

Some people view everything the Harkles do as the actions of royals, simply because the press presents this kind of nonsense from Mr. and Mrs. Chucky as "royalty."

So, what is William doing? He is applying pressure, because the time has come to remove the Harkles from the royal website. They aren't royals, they aren't going to be royals, and they shouldn't be on the website. Because the Chuckys live to humiliate the BRF; that is what Tiffany loves doing most, and Chucky supports her because that is how he reacts when he can't get what he wants.

https://preview.redd.it/c5l7ggwuenih1.png?width=750&format=png&auto=webp&s=406b6a825aade342ebcbc128d5e6ccf70b92538c

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 9 days ago

And it goes on and on and on. (Neil Sean's gossip)

Someone commented—prompted by something Neil Sean said—that Harrods didn't have a radio station and that Sean was lying. If I made a mistake in writing this, the fault is mine, not Sean's. What Sean actually said was that he met Diana's stepmother because she worked for Harrods, while he was working at the time for a radio station that Al Fayed had purchased. In May 1996, Al-Fayed bought the British station Viva Radio for £3 million. He renamed it Liberty Radio, focusing on broadcasting and commentary for Fulham FC matches, until it was sold in 2000. Sean mentioned running into the stepmother in the Harrods staff canteen or in the radio station's corridors. That is also how Sean met Dodi.

I had no idea about that, and I didn't bother looking into it yesterday, either. So no, Sean didn't lie; I just didn't explain it well. When Sean is clearly lying, believe me, I’ll say so; but more often than not, it’s not that he’s lying—it’s just that he moves so fast and says so much that sometimes he loses the thread of what he was saying.

As for liars, we have the Harkles.

BUSTED - HOW WAS THIS A SURPRISE MEGHAN? YOU ORGANISED IT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOdA9r7xNrY

One thing some people don't get is the scoop on this:

Why does Claw never promote her products? Sean has said, repeatedly, that it’s because she believes she is so incredibly famous that she doesn't need to promote anything. She sells something, and people buy it simply because she’s the one selling it.

In the video comments, many people say it seems as though Sean actually believes that. But no, even Neil Sean doesn't understand why Claw believes it. He has cited Kylie Minogue, Priscilla Presley, Madonna, and Kate Moss as examples of highly famous women who had to promote their own products, and he was personally involved in the work Priscilla was doing to sell bed linens, a venture that ultimately didn't succeed.

https://preview.redd.it/djg7aofhqfih1.png?width=399&format=png&auto=webp&s=a3d2595b7ab9525f7d2ed6182249fecb61bf8e44

Sean, who knows Kylie well, said that, of course, she is successful with her wine—but only after more than five years of hard work beforehand. He noted that she had to promote it heavily and price it right. And after all, it is Kylie Minogue; Madonna once said she was jealous of her because Guy Ritchie liked her.

He heard that piece of gossip from Montecito and has since confirmed it to be true: it seems that Claw not only lacks confidence in her own product but also firmly believes that her name—Rachel Meghan Markle—is big enough to sell it on its own. He simply cannot fathom why Claw persists in that belief, given that it lies at the very root of *As Ever*'s failure.

Sean stated—and it has since been borne out—that Netflix didn't want to work with Claw anymore precisely because she never promoted *As Ever* or *With Love*. Claw also ran into trouble with *MasterChef Australia* for failing to promote that show as well. And now, look at the future Emmy winner... Daytime Emmy 😈, that is: what has she actually done to promote her nomination?

Sean has said that by now, Harry ought to realize he is nothing more than Claw’s bag carrier.

What Claw is fully aware of, however, is that Harry is a laughingstock in the legal world. When Sean predicted—correctly, as it turned out—that we would get Nicklin’s ruling in the ANL case in early July, he noted that there was a great deal of anticipation and rumor-mongering in the courts. After all, what would Nicklin say about a lawsuit that had been shown to lack evidence?

https://preview.redd.it/v8xb49p4rfih1.jpg?width=1024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=40a424e43a71ea60089cc9573ea1eb427eebe9c9

And things aren't going to get better when the Sentebale matter is no longer under a publicity embargo. It’s not just Sean; Fitzwilliams, Rebecca English, and practically all the royal reporters are saying that the information leaked from the court regarding that case is not good for Harry at all. And in that instance, Claw is very much to blame.

However, there is one thing Sean wants to make clear: many people also speculate that Claw would like to take the Spencer surname and thereby secure Althorp. Setting aside the fact that this isn't going to happen, Sean says Claw has no interest in Althorp. Yes, seriously—she isn't interested. That’s because it is "too" countrified, too rural, and too isolated. That is why she detests Balmoral. Sean says Althorp simply isn't "glamorous enough" for her. She doesn't want to live in a place that she views as remote.

https://preview.redd.it/cvjog0irsfih1.png?width=1061&format=png&auto=webp&s=1938f62e4dad04451ef561a6cb6def183ff9596a

Claw is only happy when she’s at events—like the David Foster Foundation event.

But what about the bagpipes? It turns out that the people who invited the Harkles—and make no mistake, it was Harry who was invited, with Claw tagging along—wanted to make a nice gesture toward Harry. So, a bit of royal cosplay ensued.

https://preview.redd.it/sz4z9bfgtfih1.png?width=335&format=png&auto=webp&s=def4f669e1a432b1462437e1d27567057accc0d5

Does Harry love bagpipes? No, that’s not true. It’s Charles who adores Scotland. There’s no doubt about that.

https://preview.redd.it/l37opg1ltfih1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=02ab4fb847b95227bf2c3df339c61794e77001cd

William, we'll see you in a kilt!!! Sooner or later, we'll see you in a kilt. 😈 Or do you not want to use it because you won't look like Major Thompson? 😏😏

https://preview.redd.it/2w4u78n8vfih1.png?width=634&format=png&auto=webp&s=9ec774f84fc798f1efb5eb6f342791064d906094

For one thing, Claw simply can't bring herself to call Harry by his name. She phrased it that way because she loathes the idea of ​​people being more interested in him than in her.

Another thing: Claw had her phone in her hand the whole time.

https://preview.redd.it/ijqsfxknufih1.png?width=653&format=png&auto=webp&s=9abbc82cbe118289d232aab36c3868283c2717ab

She filmed the event constantly... yet she never recorded the moment the donation was made—if, in fact, they actually donated. Sean was told it was done privately so the amount wouldn't be revealed... Excuse me? Since when are they so shy? Harry once blurted out that he’d donated a million pounds. Why the secrecy now? Oh, right—it’s not just now; it’s always been this way. They never say how much they donate because either they don't donate at all, or the amount is a pittance.

Why did David Foster invite them? Ah, because he needed publicity to show that the foundation is active—in a world where so many are going bankrupt. Foster used the Harkles for that. Nothing more. So, he gave them what Claw wanted: a private jet, a camera, and a private show. Everything a girl dreams of. 🤭

PRINCE LOUIS SPEAKS & THIS HAPPENS PLUS ANDREW..DISGRACEFUL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Tc9oEhTQSw

Sean revealed yesterday that Harry had left photos of the Sussex children for William. And Sean made it clear that William has no interest in seeing them—not even in photos.

The curious thing is that Sean has never said Harry asked for private photos of the Wales children. Mind you, he would never get them, but the question remains: would Harry even want photos of his nieces and nephews?

The answer is NO.

There is a near-unanimous consensus among royal reporters that Harry flew into a total rage over this image from late 2019.

https://preview.redd.it/pdjlssljwfih1.png?width=495&format=png&auto=webp&s=cc9435000e2f1fdd1247f579166ec4af001662ff

The photo of the Queen and her heirs. And Harry was never included. Obviously, because is he an heir? It seems that, in his mind, he is.

George's birth was not a source of happiness for Harry. That day, Harry officially ceased to be the "spare." He was displaced by his nephew, and later by his other two nephews.

So Harry has never asked for a photo of his nephews, even though he wants to force William to accept one of the Sussex children.

George is 13 years old. Tic Tac Harry.

https://preview.redd.it/on5jk4k8xfih1.png?width=2560&format=png&auto=webp&s=b0bfe499970d72209ff371cf2b6816a729a9fd35

You can really see Kate’s hand in making sure William looks good—and George and Louis, too. It looks like Claw drags Harry off the sofa to go out.

But the one Claw and Harry hate the most is Louis.

https://preview.redd.it/utore654yfih1.png?width=911&format=png&auto=webp&s=0db0f9a226e07c4276ee13af412a06b86b90e298

Because Louis is very charming and personable—a happy child, and it shows. But in this brief moment, when Kate says to him, "Louis, you're perfecting your handstand at the moment," he spontaneously replies, "A bit... but Charlotte says I'm not very good."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hy6i6M9BQkI

That is what terrifies Harry. Harry would have loved for Louis to be a troublemaker—rebellious and rude... just like he was when he was eight. But no; Louis is likable, he has fun and isn't afraid to show it, and he has a personality. In other words, he’s not a "Harry." And for Harry—the one from Montecito—that was a blow to the part of him he no longer has, because Claw keeps it in her purse 🤭.

So now, what will happen with the Sussex children? Obviously, they will be compared, and they have already lost that battle. Charlotte is quite the little lady, and Louis is a boy who really appeals to people. George is already a teenager. So, what will happen with Archie and Lil' D? If Harry takes them to the 2027 Invictus Games, what happens if the two of them aren't like Louis? And if Harry doesn't bring them, won't he be criticized?

Harry is furious because his children won't receive even half the affection the Wales children get. But Sean asks: why should they? We don't know anything about them.

Why does Harry believe his children deserve the same affection that the Wales children have earned from the public?

Harry will always be haunted by the fact that the Queen—who was feeling unwell—stepped out onto the balcony because the people wanted to see her. And Louis made that final appearance, which had cost her so much effort, joyful and fun.

https://preview.redd.it/fa6frrsp0gih1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=cdb568b9a69262bee077e20a4661e0f41a9bdae9

Harry thinks it all comes down to popularity. Sean reminds him of what Harry himself said: that it’s all about how many events they attend, who makes the covers, who gets written about, and so on. So, why does he expect people to like the Invisikids? Are we supposed to like the backs of their heads—since that’s all anyone ever sees? Or like them because of what Harry and Claw say about them? Who could possibly like kids who eat Brussels sprouts? That’s a huge lie.

And the word on Andrew is that his funeral is being planned. Arrangements have already been made for a royal funeral—though not a state funeral—funded by the King out of his private funds, not by taxpayers. Sean says that couldn't have been pleasant news for Andrew to see. Now Sean says it's August—fine—but isn't there any other news besides that?

SUSSEXES & ITV - ALL KICKING OFF NOW AFTER THIS - ANYONE LEFT THEY DON’T FALL FOUL OFF LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XV0zvb4sjs

ITV is facing a major internal crisis. The atmosphere at the channel is poor.

And it’s not just ITV; this is an underlying issue for TV channels in many parts of the world.

But ITV believes it holds a winning card: Harry.

Or so they thought.

At the beginning of the year, ITV was clearly focused on being pro-Harkle. They even traveled to Ukraine with him to conduct an exclusive interview. And then, in July, ITV had another exclusive interview with Harry.

And Sean understands why that is. Because the Harkles generate headlines. Whether it’s due to their nonsense or whatever else, Tom Bradby saw that the Harkles stir up controversy, and controversy drives clicks. And now, because of that, he’s been shut out of William and Kate’s inner circle. He claimed it didn’t bother him, but he’s just another liar.

ITV has a podcast—or something similar—that covers royal topics. It’s hosted by a woman named Charlene White. I don’t know who she is, but Sean has had no time for her ever since she refused to appear on camera wearing a poppy. So yes, he revels in the fact that she also failed with *Loose Women*, an ITV show that is mired in one controversy after another.

Now, Tom Bradby isn't too happy with Harry, because there was supposed to be a new exclusive interview with Chris Ship.

It turns out that on July 7, as Harry was leaving Chatham House, several of us noticed Chris Ship in the photos that came out that day. He appears here on the left; his face is visible. No, it wasn't a coincidence

https://preview.redd.it/txsugg5u4gih1.png?width=2000&format=png&auto=webp&s=a9d179a9d937b629d8a143e46d68d7df3088bad3

Harry was supposed to speak to the press—after all, that was why he was there: to talk and promote *Invictus*. But we know what happened that day: Harry lost his case against ANL by a landslide—a World Cup-style thrashing. So, at the eleventh hour, Harry decided not to speak to the press. He spoke only to Alison Hammond.

But for Tom Bradby, the matter went a bit further. Because it turns out *This Morning* had an exclusive with Harry... and their audience didn't increase one bit.

But that is causing internal conflict, because does Harry only speak with people who will never ask him uncomfortable questions and who accept only pre-agreed questions? Or will he only talk about trivial matters?

Because if that’s the case, Harry only wants to speak to Alison Hammond—effectively shutting out the rest of ITV, which hasn't gone down well at all.

And Harry doesn't care about that; he doesn't care that his attitude could harm the Invictus Games.

MARKLE & MARTHA - NOW IT'S TURNING UGLY ..TOLD YOU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAKIb2ZsLfo

Martha and Claw. This isn't going to stop because it suits Claw. It works in Claw's favor because all of this is generating headlines for her.

Sean says Martha is credible because people watched her show and could actually do the things she did—much like Mary Berry in the UK. Claw, on the other hand, doesn't know how to cook; she tried to be an actress and failed, tried to be a royal and failed...

So, Sean stands by what he said yesterday: Claw will lose if she goes up against Martha. And now Sean says this showdown will be just as big a deal as that stupid Netflix curtsy.

Claw denies having spoken about the meeting with the King at the event where she ran into Martha.

Well, here comes People magazine.

https://preview.redd.it/qcxekqq48gih1.png?width=2363&format=png&auto=webp&s=5b3e2a9dc7ece6e37d3f0c0f5bfb5a2f0f348d66

It turns out that People released an issue with Martha on the cover. And it was in that interview that Martha said that "I had dinner with Meghan Markle the other night. We were both guests at a dinner party in California. And she had just gotten back from the palace. I didn't talk to her really more than to say a couple words, but I know she was talking about it."

https://people.com/martha-stewart-recreates-1995-people-cover-bedford-farm-interview-exclusive-12033698

What happened here? Oh, People released that interview... but they didn't warn the Harkles about what Martha had said.

Sean found out—from the People side of things—that it was a deliberate decision. Not a mistake, but a decision. They decided not to tell the Harkles that Martha had said things about Claw that day, and that not everything had been published. People knew exactly what they had.

Harry and Claw are furious with People over this, since they’ve given the magazine so much access. But no— People knows what sells. Martha sells.

Claw believed she had a real connection with People magazine. She was mistaken: People wants to sell magazines; they aren't Claw's friends, nor are they her personal advertising agency.

Claw had thought the same thing about Us Weekly. But the fact is what Sean says: the Harkles are tabloid fodder—nothing more. No magazine can afford to be kind to fading celebrities these days.

And for People magazine, the fact that the Harkles stepped in to refute Martha was pure gold. People went to see what Martha had said and bought the magazine—all because of the Harkles. Meanwhile, Martha—who actually became a millionaire through her show and lifestyle products—has emerged from this even stronger.

And what about Claw and Harry? Once again—yes, once again—they come across as people who insult and mistreat the elderly. They did it to Philip by going on air with Oprah while he was hospitalized. They insulted the Queen with that infamous curtsy. They have offended Thomas Markle in many ways. They have offended Camilla. They have offended KC3... And now, attacking Martha Stewart.

https://preview.redd.it/gsleba6hagih1.png?width=220&format=png&auto=webp&s=124ebe68fcee5ff98f8e841557dae0ad64baa1d7

https://preview.redd.it/p7fbfc0ragih1.png?width=399&format=png&auto=webp&s=61f08f02c80e2c97df30cf2d832aae95a095cf72

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 10 days ago

Some people are so insincere that they are no longer aware that they think the exact opposite of what they say. (Marcel Aymé; Neil Sean's gossip)

https://preview.redd.it/9llna3meg8ih1.png?width=1270&format=png&auto=webp&s=fb80637887052158a6f7484723ab48d6bebc3fa2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIXT9EbhhRk

Well, July was the month the Harkles returned to the UK. Photos in the most prestigious media outlets, adoring crowds cheering them on, the balcony—it was all so thrilling!

https://preview.redd.it/95q0ksxye9ih1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=f0b4260a4ad5962e6b35f7a1860f6b310c45e9b7

Yes, it was all so thrilling... in the Harkles' minds. Because none of that actually happened. In fact, Claw still can't believe how little interest there was in her meeting with the King. Harry, however, knew—thanks to reporter Sean and his source—that it wasn't going to be a star-studded trip or a publicity game-changer.

Harry was obsessed with holding onto Invictus and getting the King to agree to open the games. Yet, as far as Sean knows, there isn't even the slightest indication of that happening. Nothing. And at Invictus, they know the royals don't want to attend because of the Harkles.

https://preview.redd.it/zk9ge5t5f9ih1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=c174b073a5e68c973b796ee7cfc9d78817cdf108

And Claw kept a low profile—not by choice, but because that was the King's order. It was a 47-minute visit, though word has leaked that Claw and the children actually spent only 17 minutes with the King; the rest of the time, Harry was alone with Charles and Camilla. Sean doesn't say that—he just cites the 47 minutes—but if Charles really only spent 17 minutes with those children and Claw, then the meeting was a total disaster.

Sean points out something that is obvious to all of us: Charles wasn't moved—because who are those children? He doesn't know them, and they don't know him. And it will be a long time before they see each other again, because let's be clear: chats via Zoom or FaceTime? No.

After the 47-minute meeting, the Harkles headed to Althorp.

Sean notes that his connection to the Spencers goes back a long way. It wasn't just a case of seeing Diana in passing—he actually interviewed her—but he also met Diana's stepmother, Raine Spencer, because he worked for a radio station based at Harrods, which was owned by Al Fayed. So, he met Dodi as well. Sean says that because he would run into them in an informal setting—such as the employee canteen or the radio station itself, which was owned by Al Fayed—it was possible to talk about things that aren't discussed in interviews. That is also how Sean met Charles Spencer.

Sean brings this up because, as you will see, the Harkles are once again insisting on being able to use the Spencer surname. And so, Claw needed to appear charming. That is why Claw was especially nice to Charles Spencer’s new wife, Catrine Jarman

https://preview.redd.it/gv9ziumff9ih1.png?width=547&format=png&auto=webp&s=23aceeb78f02a86d9587915d3619a7aef900fed9

Narcissists always do that.

Sean doesn't really know what Charles Spencer's wife is thinking. He only knows that she spoke with Claw, that they seemed to get along, and that packages have arrived at Althorp. You know the sort of thing: candles, bookmarks, spreads.

So, will the Harkles go to Balmoral? Sean notes in passing that they are hoping to receive a "belated" invitation. I don't see that happening, given that the King has decided to cut his time there short; pressing matters—such as internal political issues—make it difficult for him to be off-duty for so long.

It does seem that Andrew received an invitation. He won't be staying in the main house; instead, he'll stay in the cottage where Fergie used to stay when she visited the area to be with her daughters. Andrew isn't going to see the King—in fact, Sean notes that his source told him Andrew will only appear there once neither KC3 nor, obviously, William is present—though he will meet with Edward and Anne.

But so far, Sean hasn't heard that Harry has been invited.

https://preview.redd.it/uylgxuwsf9ih1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=91528812bcdafee5f1c3a973ab3abd0cae583f86

And that must be affecting Harry, because Harry craves validation—especially from William. But for William, Harry doesn't exist. Neither he nor Harry's children. So, what is Harry left to do? Sow discord. Once again, Harry is trying to turn the tables to pit William, Camilla, and KC3 against one another. But Harry has no idea how things really work; he doesn't understand his family.

Sean reaffirms that William and Camilla get along very well and that both were in complete agreement that if Harry shows up, Camilla must be present. Sean reiterates that the King fully agrees with this. At one point, Camilla might have thought it wasn't a good idea, but she now has no doubt that what Harry wants in this regard is of no importance whatsoever.

The other key person in this is Kate. It is incredible that, after more than ten years, Harry failed to realize what she is really like. After all, 2024 was a grueling ordeal for her and her entire family. She is much more mature now, her outlook on life changed, as happens to many people who face the Big C. But if Harry thought he could use her to get William to back down, he was completely mistaken. Kate does not forgive Harry for everything he has said against William. She isn't going to lift a finger for Harry. Because Harry (and everything surrounding him) is simply a huge source of frustration and stress.

So, given that situation, is anyone surprised that Harry—once again, yes, once again—left some framed photos of the Sussex children for the Waleses, and they haven't picked them up?

"Once again"? Yes, because Harry did the same thing in September 2025. And Sean mentioned something back in February about the photos still sitting in some official's drawer.

Back in 2025, Harry had left photos of the children for William—and found out (since he watches the channels of Neil Sean, Mark Dolan, Dan Wootton, and all the others) that William didn't care; now, in July 2026, Harry tried to give those photos to William in person.

Do I need to say how William responded to that?

https://preview.redd.it/qn72lpvfg9ih1.png?width=220&format=png&auto=webp&s=5c7709ae70bf085edb48f25ed73f75fa7cad8194

So, since Harry couldn't leave the photos with him in person, he made a point of finding out whether or not William had picked them up. And the answer was:

https://preview.redd.it/48bnlg1hg9ih1.png?width=220&format=png&auto=webp&s=5706245963b55703359af9b6a318f5911874d5b4

That is why we see Harry spewing his venom through the press—just as he has been doing for years. William won’t budge an inch when it comes to the Harkles. Charles still believes the damage might be repairable, but William believes the harm Harry has caused the monarchy is irreparable—and unforgivable. William suspects that it will fall to him and George to clean up the mess Harry has made; it seems William found out about the "pill" incident at the same time we did, so he already realizes that revelations about Harry will be a talking point for years to come.

Harry cannot believe William's indifference toward the Sussex children. But for William, a couple of photos and a mediocre apology are not enough.

https://preview.redd.it/e4z0qua7g9ih1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=621cc0a85157bde7c18f125ae59e9277d02ed791

And the problem for Harry and Claw is that if William doesn't validate they, nothing is going to work in Hollywood. Everyone already knows that the Harkles don't really have a team advising them—since they can no longer afford one—but are instead working with "independents," meaning people who help them for a fee, they work outside Montecito, so they hardly ever see Claw—which is a relief.. The Harkles are on a downward spiral because their standing in that world looks bad.

And Claw is largely to blame for that, because she is seen as being very lazy about launching her brand. That workgroup consists of young people who don't have much experience. That way, it's easier for them to give in to Claw. And naturally, they make mistakes.

The absurd thing is that Sean reiterates that Claw’s only real talent is stirring up controversy—and silly controversies at that, like the plastic tiara she wore for her recent birthday. Yes, she knows people would mock it—saying it’s the only kind of tiara she could wear—but that is precisely what she’s after: staying part of the conversation. It’s classic narcissism: "It doesn't matter if they speak ill of me, as long as they don't ignore me." Claw seeks to generate reactions.

https://preview.redd.it/eyutm050h9ih1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=ac4649bb2b5c429e592b35f82cf6e17011376bcc

The problem is that she always gets it wrong. Because that mediocre video of her dancing with the balloons was not even remotely spontaneous... nor was it the first take. It was the third. Actually, the initial idea was for Harry to walk in with a birthday cake... but the Harkles had already done that in another video, which took about seven or nine takes to shoot.

https://preview.redd.it/owouv6ahh9ih1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=977a909a083d8cf61af3d8764d351e61681c75f6

The funny thing is that other people manage to benefit from Claw. Take Poh Ling Yeow, for instance; she has achieved considerable popularity despite Claw. She’s even been told it’s in her best interest to keep a low profile, as that could help her land an appearance on *MasterChef USA*. And Sean says it would be to Claw’s advantage to have her on his side. But Claw never gets that.

https://preview.redd.it/ewpamy5oh9ih1.png?width=520&format=png&auto=webp&s=5ddd0adb6e04cd878342c826473afee61bb0c14d

Why was Claw's birthday video so short this year? Because of Harry—he's unstable. And lately, he's been going through one of those emotionally unstable phases. Harry started July feeling furious, disappointed, and all the rest of it. But he was ending the month thinking "everything is going to work out"—which is something Sherbone *didn't* tell him. Sherbone has been calling Harry lately, after having been MIA, so Harry wakes up thinking, "Today's going to be a good day," but no—it isn't, not when Sherbone calls.

https://preview.redd.it/kljopau5i9ih1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=a0d221d59f6698f072b4f8aa073f5d52e8d4d53e

Well, the Harkles' current team—who are less experienced—have backed down from going up against Martha Stewart. A bad idea.

It seems they haven't realized that Claw threw Harry under the bus regarding Martha—because that’s what Claw always does; she always sends Harry in to defend her. Claw never defends herself—how very feminist! 🤭🤭But Sean is well aware that it was Claw who claimed Martha was "confused" about Claw discussing her meeting with KC3—knowing full well she was undermining Martha. "Oh, never mind; that lady—who’s over 80—must be confused." That was the subtext of the comment. And Martha didn't like it one bit. Yet Claw can't forgive Martha for actually benefiting from the situation, since Martha's website saw an increase in traffic, not Claw's. And it seems Martha knows it.

But Claw can't help being Claw. So, she’ll do what every narcissist does: make a video featuring one of Martha's cookbooks to "bury the hatchet." Ideally, she’d have a video with Martha, just like the one she did with Gwyneth Paltrow. But that isn't going to happen. Now, Sean says that the story isn't over yet.

https://preview.redd.it/1gj19opwi9ih1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=8ff14436d4a7d8ad4d6ed55e6d10c26a1928e117

WILLIAM & THE MARTHA EFFECT FINALLY PAYS OFF

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPzV028iiBE

William is absolutely certain that Martha didn't lie. Claw was talking about that polo match—the only time the Wales children crossed paths with Archie—because Claw is just Claw. Sean says that at the match, Claw was obsessively focused on what the then-Cambridges had in the trunk of their car. According to Sean, William didn't miss this, and it only made him feel even more repulsed by Claw.

https://preview.redd.it/0x9wflyaj9ih1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=6c374ec314ffc0fc29f5cdac6fb472357d6b3038

Regarding the Harkles, William inherited Philip’s instincts: there is no repairing the situation now, because everything William suspected about Claw has come to pass—just as it did with Philip and Fergie.

As time goes on, it has become clear that the meeting with KC3 wasn't the success Harry and Claw had hoped for. This wasn't just on a personal level; it was also because Harry insisted that KC3 attend the Invictus Games. The problem for Harry is that he keeps insisting... yet fails to give KC3 any real, plausible reasons to do so. William, on the other hand, has provided ample grounds for staying away from Invictus.

To begin with, there are the Harkles themselves. Secondly: the Harkles are compulsive liars. Both of them lie, and they never stop lying. William doesn't want to be around people like that.

But the big problem for William is: why should he and KC3 get involved with Invictus now, after having been excluded for years? Why is Harry suddenly so interested? Perhaps it’s because there is a major disaster he wants KC3 to fix?

William had already made a gesture toward Invictus back in 2020 by donating the proceeds from his settlement with The Sun. Not only did Harry never thank him, but he actually used that fact against William in his own lawsuits against the press—claiming "William received a million pounds in compensation from a secret settlement"—without ever mentioning that William had donated that money to Invictus. So, why is there such desperation now?

And the problem for Harry is that while KC3 may love him as a son, he isn't blind. KC3 sees things the same way William does, and William is right about many of the things he has said regarding Harry and the Harkles.

It looked like Claw was about to open her mouth. In that regard, William certainly believes Martha. And it seems KC3 believes Martha. Why would they believe Harry?

https://preview.redd.it/2fog2u9pj9ih1.png?width=399&format=png&auto=webp&s=e32d3c72bba55c1bfa9001052b2874c6647e449d

But the interesting thing about this piece of gossip—which comes from an excellent source—is how that conversation played out recently. Because it seems the tone was something like this: William saying to the King, "You see? I told you so. You wanted to invite them—you even wanted me to see Harry. I didn't want to meet them—here were my reasons—and look at what's happening now."

Sean had already mentioned in previous videos that Harry had insisted on seeing William, that he didn't understand why William didn't show up at Highgrove, and that he had asked Charles if he had told William he would be there with the Sussex children. So, the gossip on this point remains consistent: Harry cannot accept the idea that William has absolutely no interest in meeting his Sussex-side nephews and niece. Zero interest.

https://preview.redd.it/zvkbd9zsj9ih1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=dd8092a02605aca5eefed9b9f3c1536a8af2bf84

And in all this, KC3 feels a stronger connection with Martha than with Harry and Claw. After all, Martha has no reason to lie about this; furthermore, Claw deserves to be seen as a woman incapable of honoring an agreement, since not only did she think she could compete with Stewart, but she also used one of her recipes without permission.

Now, if you thought Sean would say "William is furious"... well, no; unfortunately for Harry, that’s not the case. William is actually smiling at all this controversy, because it’s a huge "I told you so" moment directed at KC3. William is intent on shutting the door completely on the Harkles—ruthlessly, without pulling any punches. And this only works to William's advantage by painting Harry and Claw as people incapable of following orders.

https://preview.redd.it/uf43tnmsk9ih1.png?width=1380&format=png&auto=webp&s=06f06f84a167376cac0ca8eebfa3ecdffaf1a0eb

But William appears to be aiming for a bigger objective; it seems that during that conversation—which apparently didn't take place behind closed doors but rather in the presence of advisors—he pointed out to King Charles III that controversies like this one are yet another reason why the British public dislikes the Harkles. According to that source, it seems William was rubbing salt in KC3's wounds by pointing out that this adds to Claw's infamous curtsy in the Netflix documentary. That was so offensive!

Sean says that source—an excellent one—told him that the infamous curtsy was what ultimately sealed the Harkles' coffin as far as William was concerned.

https://preview.redd.it/pfqub1lwk9ih1.png?width=760&format=png&auto=webp&s=6a8ba4d4a8e1c9ade85147b70b608e4b8518d236

That was the final straw and, according to that source, the reason why there will never be a reconciliation between Harry and William. As for the King, Sean says that the last shred of patience he had left is practically exhausted.

ALL SMILES IN PUBLIC YET BEHIND THE SCENES THIS HAPPENED - LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBnbhYmrUGg

The Harkles always play the game of diverting attention. And these days, the Harkles are focused on attending charity dinners where they pay for admission.

The problem is that the Harkles ruin everything.

For starters, they went to Canada on a private jet. In other words, polluting the environment.

And they went to an event for a successful foundation—David Foster's—where he appeared with his wife, Katharine McPhee. In which Adam Levine, lead singer of Maroon 5, participated.

Sean recalls how, during the California wildfires, Claw tried to contact Levine to get Billie Eilish merchandise. Sean says, "See how everything connects?" Because Levine doesn't even really know who Claw is.

Because, once again, the one who matters is Harry. Foster wanted Harry, not Claw.

Sean says he met McPhee when she had just started dating Foster and was starring in the musical *Waitress*. That seems to have been around the same time Claw was dating Harry—a relationship that was already public knowledge. McPhee pointed out that she and Claw had been friends back in school and invited her to see *Waitress*, even posting a photo; that really upset Claw. So, things were frosty between them at the time. The relationship only picked up steam again when McPhee married Foster, and Claw saw potential there to capitalize on.

But McPhee asked Claw why he didn't go see her in *Waitress*. And Claw—I mean, isn't it obvious?—played the same old card: he claimed he didn't want to be the center of attention and that the press would have made a big fuss about it. Sean says McPhee didn't buy that story.

https://preview.redd.it/2y8po814l9ih1.png?width=335&format=png&auto=webp&s=86fb0ab35c500d93e13fed8d59347b5ff9a44111

Foster needed publicity for his foundation—it was a tough time for foundations. So, he invited Harry, and Claw showed up with him. Foster didn't mind, because he liked Harry and got along well with him. That wasn't the case with Claw.

https://preview.redd.it/gzr0z48nl9ih1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=3c3d54489d7069a6116f98907911bec3effba032

u/Human-Economics6894 — 11 days ago

Royal Family RECAP: Harry and Meghan 'considering' bombshell admission in royal feud (Daily Express)

Royal Family RECAP: Harry and Meghan 'considering' bombshell admission in royal feud

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/2236858/royal-family-live-harry-meghan

https://archive.ph/7ziWa

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are considering issuing a public apology to King Charles for causing "enormous pain" over the last five years, sources suggest. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex could craft a statement that "gives the King the respect he wants without forcing Harry and Meghan to walk back every interview, documentary or page of Spare", a source said. It comes amid the growing possibility of a reconciliation between the Sussexes and the Palace, with Harry and Meghan reuniting their children with Charles at Highgrove House last month. The source told royal journalist Rob Shuter: "Everyone agrees trust has to be rebuilt. An apology doesn't have to be a surrender. It's an acknowledgement that this family feud went too far. Charles wants peace - but he also wants respect. This could be the first real step towards both."

The estrangement between Harry and Meghan and the rest of the Firm has been linked to the couple's allegations of racism and mistreatment, and bombshell revelations made about members of the family in the duke's memoir, Spare. This isn't about Harry and Meghan admitting they were wrong about everything," the source told Mr Shuter's Naughty But Nice Substack. "It's about acknowledging that the past five years have caused enormous pain. The debate now is over what an apology should say, and, just as importantly, what it shouldn't."

Note the detail: an apology to KC3... not to Camilla, not to William, not to Kate. And no retraction or admission that they had lied. Just an apology—an empty one—yet making it clear that they remain the victims.

But the funny thing is that this supposed apology—if made in those terms—would essentially acknowledge that the Harkles *did* know what they were doing and didn't care about the pain they caused.

But this is just gossip. I don't think they're desperate enough to do that—or are they?

u/Human-Economics6894 — 12 days ago

Two women, one path (Neil Sean's gossip)

https://preview.redd.it/9xc2wesdc1ih1.png?width=345&format=png&auto=webp&s=023ad840de060b20373abdb6726c9fa42337910c

You've probably never seen it. But this Mexican telenovela, with 229 episodes—that's almost a whole year, a record!!!!—was a huge hit. The series tells the story of Juan Daniel, known as Johnny, a U.S.-born Mexican truck driver and family man who falls in love with a woman he meets on his travels, and the complications that arise from his new love.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hd8cBCd7Ar4&list=RDHd8cBCd7Ar4&start_radio=1

It’s on YouTube for anyone who wants a laugh. It has everything. Literally everything.

And why am I telling you this? Ah, because of this.

👇👇👇👇👇👇

https://preview.redd.it/q59lutj4d1ih1.png?width=1335&format=png&auto=webp&s=be24acca13fd27162494ec0b3a47258bff72f6dc

HARRY & THE SECRET TWO WOMEN CLASHING OVER HIM BEHIND THE SCENES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmWbHNQoaAQ

One of the things I’ve realized over the time I’ve been watching these videos is that Sean talks to a great many people. On the street, on the train, at events—he talks to so many people. And that is what many journalists forget: a source can be the King’s private secretary just as easily as a doorman at Buckingham Palace. And the doorman is more likely to see more things.

July arrived with some really juicy gossip. For starters, Harry had suddenly decided to accept a room there, and then, oops! there weren't any left.

Sean was one of the first to explain that the issue was that Harry should have given 28 days' notice—rather than just a couple of days before arriving—and that Harry had plans in place which the Palace thwarted by shutting the door on him.

https://preview.redd.it/m64wkyzoe1ih1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=1b222142161236285e32aeba388299dba1a167a7

Harry’s back-and-forth behavior has become a habit; he always does the same thing. It just seems that patience has run out. And this is neither the first nor the last time Harry has found the Palace fed up with his circus. Because that is all the Harkles do: a circus—a media circus.

https://preview.redd.it/r5n1xys7f1ih1.png?width=646&format=png&auto=webp&s=3b3146d54ae6c892da2fdc516514191eee33fd5f

In the midst of that circus was Alison Hammond. She is from Birmingham, she works for ITV, and ITV is pro-Harkle.

Why Alison Hammond? Well, for starters, Harry spoke about her on Colbert’s late-night show; but for ITV, the key factor is that she’s from Birmingham, and they want to link her to the Invictus Games in hopes of securing the broadcasting rights for the 2027 games.

The other reason is that Alison Hammond got into trouble when she said they would miss British presenter Phillip Schofield. Schofield left ITV in May 2023 after admitting to an "unwise but not illegal" affair with a younger male colleague on This Morning.

Alison received a lot of complaints for saying that, so she knows when to keep her mouth shut and be... In Chile, we call someone "yellow," which is a derogatory way of referring to someone who shows lukewarmness, moderation, or a reluctance to become radical. In other words, "neither fish nor fowl."

https://preview.redd.it/ra2jy1kgr1ih1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=58b184e81f69192ba4b9679e3c6468de4f76a086

ITV's Cat Deeley also wants to be involved.

https://preview.redd.it/32ul67l8i1ih1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=387afe683db517bb7df5faedcbb7c3516d616fc0

Sean shares part of her career history, holding an advantage over Alison: Deely was the host of *So You Think You Can Dance* in the US.

The point here isn't just that Cat is also from Birmingham, but rather who she is friends with.

https://preview.redd.it/lm8e351rj1ih1.png?width=850&format=png&auto=webp&s=0c7cb576645e5855b2590b845fda8157c5605e7d

And here we have Markus Anderson!!! The third party in Claw and Harry's marriage. Sean has already mentioned how Claw has spent more time around Markus than Harry, because she can actually talk to Markus, and he knows all her secrets.

Also, Cat Deeley meets Harry, and they get along well.

So why didn't Cat Deeley interview Harry?

Ah, because ITV is playing both sides: they support the Harkles, but they don't want to make it too obvious because they don't want to lose the royal connection they have with Kate's Christmas concert, which pays off handsomely for ITV.

But behind the scenes, it seems there were issues with that, so ITV has decided that if the Games go ahead—and if they secure the rights to the Invictus Games (let’s be honest, only ITV is interested in broadcasting them, so they have no competition)—then both Cat and Alison will share the coverage. That is, of course, assuming *This Morning* is still on the air and they are still with ITV. And assuming...

Yes, there are a lot of "ifs."

Right, they would split the coverage: one would be with Harry and the other with Claw—assuming Claw shows up in 2027, and, of course, provided there is a royal connection.

And of course, the question is: which of the two will draw more viewers? As Sean says, they’ll both claim to be great friends and all that, but the fact is, ITV doesn’t need friends—it needs people watching the show. So, which of the two has more potential to do that?

The funny thing about the gossip is that ITV doesn't even consider the idea that Claw has the power to draw an audience 🤭🤭🤭

MARKLE BIRTHDAY DISASTER -HARRY, DOGS , NO KIDS & THEN THIS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6hDx138tH0

As we already know, our Saint had a birthday. And, as always, she loves herself so much that she celebrated it herself.

https://preview.redd.it/ignzdxazl1ih1.png?width=320&format=png&auto=webp&s=94a5f97fb4a9e90e7aad6f3e2ba39df906cb3c8c

Whitesnake - Is This Love

🎼Is this love that I'm feeling?
Is this the love that I've been searching for?
Is this love, or am I dreaming?
This must be love, 'cause it's really got a hold on me
A hold on me🎼

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6hDx138tH0

Claw is desperate because she needs the media to keep talking about the meeting she had with KC3. Because that’s how it is: she had a meeting. Harry and the children were just window dressing. And all because the press didn't give her the coverage she expected—didn't make it global news. It can't be global news if there are no photos, right 😈😈?

Claw doesn't understand that she is yesterday's news. And people see her as a big liar.

And Martha Stewart served that purpose because 1) she is much more famous than Claw, and 2) she also benefited from people knowing that she had published her 101st book.

Claw had hoped that meeting would open the door to interviews—like in *Vogue*, especially given her birthday—or a photoshoot; you know the drill. But no—and we’re back to the main issue—the real focus was the meeting with KC3, and Claw ran into a problem: where is the evidence? Where are the photos? Nobody is interested in seeing her dressed like Columbo.

https://preview.redd.it/7tfjovojn1ih1.png?width=444&format=png&auto=webp&s=954735b3f538ea3e1742eebd27e7772bae4ae9fa

Anyway, Claw treated us to another dance... barefoot. Seriously—sneakers on the beach, but barefoot in the kitchen again?

https://preview.redd.it/2dh1004wn1ih1.png?width=432&format=png&auto=webp&s=de26479ba5757e5ab7d38f7c2117018553d90e92

https://preview.redd.it/a6tzx637r1ih1.jpg?width=736&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bcad46a4c7c0279f1f7570044e50648ce5cd1992

Anyway, Sean says the strange thing is what you don't see or hear. What happened with the kids? When it's their mom's birthday, kids usually run to greet her. We’ve always done that.

Only Claw and Harry were there. Just them—no one else.

And everyone noticed that practically no "celebrity" wished Claw a happy birthday. Later, something popped up from some "friend." But Sean wonders: why didn't *MasterChef Australia* do anything? Wasn't she a great guest? 😏😏😏

Well, according to the gossip that reached Sean, Claw—through her team—requested that no one wish her a happy birthday... because she didn't want to deal with the negative reaction.

Which is funny, because Harry was upset that KC3 didn't even mention Claw's birthday, yet he did dedicate a post to Eugenie's new daughter.

Which is funny, because Harry was upset that KC3 didn't even mention Claw's birthday, yet he did dedicate a post to Eugenie's new daughter.

There were a few well-wishes here and there—like the one from the Paramount boss's wife.

But it seems that was all there was: messages. No gifts.

Anyway, regarding the dinner where Martha and Claw ran into each other... it seems it was a charity event, not a gathering of friends. That event was about meeting important people, which is why Martha happened to cross paths with Claw.

This leads Sean to think that the crisis—at least for As Ever—is serious if Claw has had to start attending events like that again to make contacts, rather than having those contacts come knocking at the Duchess's door.

HARRY VS MARTHA -“TRYING TO RUIN US” FIGHTING TALK LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkDzu0_zbSY

Well, Sean knows Martha too—though that’s all it is: he knows her; they’ve spoken because they’ve crossed paths on a few programs.

And Sean says that Martha had no reason to lie about this. None at all.

But Harry is absolutely furious that Martha claimed Claw was talking about the meeting with KC3 at a dinner.

https://preview.redd.it/xu6fvkzes1ih1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=571d956357cf228dec31bef1a26343c9a3208233

I stand by my position: Claw shouldn't have spoken to anyone about the matter. Not a word to anyone. But Claw couldn't keep quiet; Martha Stewart decided to use it to her own advantage, and Harry is furious with Martha—not with his indiscreet wife.

However, yesterday, when Sean brought this up, several people remarked that Claw hadn't actually spoken about the meeting and that Martha might have exaggerated the situation.

Sean—and I agree with him here—sees it the same way I do: Claw couldn't mention the matter. The meeting was private; there was to be no mention of it anywhere. Claw couldn't keep quiet, though, and since she couldn't speak about it directly, she’s using the tactic of having others talk about it while keeping her own hands clean.

But since the agreement was "no talking," Harry had to mobilize the British media to publish stories claiming Martha was mistaken and that Claw hadn't said anything. It was a very strange denial—not because the Harkles aren't experts at issuing them, but because it happened so quickly.

According to the rebuttal, someone asked Claw, "How was your trip?" and she replied "Good"—or gave a two-word answer—and Martha took the matter out of context. On top of that, there is an implicit disparagement regarding Martha's age.

Honestly, I think Martha's brain is functioning absolutely perfectly. I can't say the same for Harry's or Claw's. 🤭🤭🤭

Sean—and I’ll say it again, having encountered Martha myself—questioned her use of the situation yesterday, noting it was done merely for publicity, but he didn't claim she was lying. And Martha wasn't confused; she is very sharp, extraordinarily lucid.

Now, the problem is that it looks like Harry wasn't at that event. Sean says he's looking into the matter, but for now, Harry wasn't there, only Claw was. So Harry is believing—yes, again; what an idiot!—Claw's version of events.

As for Harry, neither of them has spoken publicly about the matter with anyone.

Martha, on the other hand, is sticking to her story.

At the beginning of the video, Sean mentions that many people criticized him yesterday, thinking he was siding with the Harkles because he didn't fully believe what Martha said. He now states that the Harkles haven't paid him to do that and that he is very flattered that "Claw" tunes in to this channel every day and she says, "Oh, I love that Neil Sean."

https://preview.redd.it/egjbdho7v1ih1.png?width=649&format=png&auto=webp&s=ddb41687eecd3f5812bcdfd549f6e6e7d4fb64af

Yeah, that is totally ridiculous... especially since Claw doesn't even say that about Harry. 🤣🤣🤣

Sean has proof that Claw actually does that—check out his channel—but the fact remains that there are still parts of that rumor that need to be investigated. That's why.

Harry is going to back Claw... again.

But Sean is interested in knowing who attended that event; surely there are friends of Martha Stewart there (curiously, Sean doesn't say friends of Claw 🤭🤭), and someone might have heard what Claw said, too. Yet, no one has come forward to back Claw.

https://preview.redd.it/h6qsek62w1ih1.png?width=201&format=png&auto=webp&s=c3dacc33564c7898c063be4f1a6f26b50f6ef584

Sean says there’s always a gray area with Claw. Nothing is ever clean-cut or transparent. But Harry is furious with Martha and determined to let it be known in the UK that Claw didn’t break the deal.

Too late, Harry—we all knew she’d do that.

The funny thing is that instead of calling Clarence House directly and leaving a message, Harry called People magazine to refute Martha's claim.

https://preview.redd.it/1ahmcdg0x1ih1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=b2cf854960501f5d391412a43c74c0a39f1e9a47

https://preview.redd.it/cnqjcdzdx1ih1.png?width=399&format=png&auto=webp&s=d5a813b37f28e0128e3fee0d32b6f40d53e80cac

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 12 days ago

Since People doesn't seem to fully accept that version of events, Meghan is using RadarOnline to vent her dissatisfaction regarding the July 10th meeting.

https://radaronline.com/p/prince-harry-christmas-reunion-royal-family-rift/

https://archive.ph/wGw5K

https://preview.redd.it/i3mr6g5a6yhh1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=05080c5b36c2265e8a66c080e6f4c1889b16bd41

EXCLUSIVE: Prince Harry Eyes Christmas Return to Royal Family Amid Rift

Prince Harry's reunion with his father, King Charles, has opened the door for more visits, including a Christmas holiday homecoming – setting the stage for an ugly showdown with estranged brother Prince William, RadarOnline.com can reveal.

Sources said the protective Prince of Wales still holds a grudge against his younger brother and diva sister-in-law Duchess Meghan [Markle] for ditching their royal duties in 2020, moving to America and trashing Britain's royals.

According to the source, Harry knows his brother will react badly to the idea – but Harry "simply doesn't care" what William thinks.

"If he wants to be nasty about it and turn it into some sort of ugly confrontation, Harry can't stop him, but he's not going to let William dictate the terms of when his children spend time with their grandfather," the insider added.

Sources said the siblings' ongoing squabble recently went nuclear when Harry, 41, and Meghan, 45, had an emotional reunion with cancer-stricken Charles, 77, and his 79-year-old wife, Queen Camilla, at Highgrove House, where the king got to see his California-based grandkids in person for the first time in four years.

Stubborn William, 44, steered clear of the meeting and his brother – even though they were a mere 12 miles apart during dual public engagements on July 7 – amid talk that the future king felt Harry was leveraging his kids to orchestrate a meeting with the monarch.

"William is furious at everything that Harry did to throw the family under the bus," royal expert Hilary A. Fordwich told RadarOnline.com. "It's emotional blackmail what Harry is doing with his children's grandfather – and without a doubt, William feels the same way."

"Harry is determined not to let this visit be a one-off, and obviously the king's diary has to be arranged well in advance, so he's already started speaking to his father about when they should meet next," the insider told RadarOnline.com

"As far as he's concerned, if Charles wants him there, that's all the encouragement he needs to keep moving forward. If it sends William into a meltdown, so be it. He's not going to be bullied."

https://radaronline.com/p/queen-camilla-meddling-prince-harry-royal-reunion/

https://archive.ph/1e5Mg

EXCLUSIVE: Queen Camilla Accused of Meddling in Prince Harry Reunion

https://preview.redd.it/qgrf9m2a6yhh1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=f3dd1e644bdac563d1943677c2a65034def04912

Prince William is fuming as calculating Queen Camilla lorded over the recent reunion of his cancer-stricken father, King Charles, with Prince Harry and wife Meghan Markle – and the future monarch fears his meddling stepmom is playing both sides to undermine his authority, RadarOnline.com can reveal.

Although security concerns nearly caused Markle and the couple's kids – Prince Archie, 7, and Princess Lilibet, 5 – to stay in America, the As Ever lifestyle mogul ultimately made the trip with the tots in tow for the hush-hush family meeting, marking the first time the king has seen his American-based grandchildren since 2022, sources said.

"Camilla's argument is that she was there to watch over things and keep an eye on Meghan because she doesn't trust her," an insider said.

"She insists she only agreed to go because Charles needed her there to support him and protect him, but William isn't buying that. As far as he's concerned, it was a classic case of her trying to divide and conquer, and he's furious she inserted herself into such a sensitive meeting without his backing."

The insider added: "He has never trusted her, and the only thing they've agreed on in recent years is how poisonous Meghan and Harry are – so the fact that she's gone behind his back and made this show of welcoming them has set all his alarms ringing.

"He's convinced this was her way of trying to undermine his authority and send the message that she's still got more power than he does – and he's livid."

https://radaronline.com/p/palace-secret-divorce-plan-prince-harry-meghan-markle-split/

https://archive.ph/wVuVt

Inside the Palace's Secret 'Divorce Plan' if Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Call It Quits

https://preview.redd.it/uwwvbdp66yhh1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=76a4127ea4047b86ffc7f7404279483379e34f3b

Buckingham Palace is quietly preparing for the possibility that Prince Harry could one day return to royal life without Meghan Markle, as officials closely monitor his growing interest in spending more time in the U.K., RadarOnline.com can reveal.

Harry, 41, and Markle, 45, seem to be leading increasingly separate lives, with the former actress having no intentions of ever living in England. Now that the prince is trying to mend fences with his family, a secret plan is reportedly in place should the couple divorce.

A royal insider claimed the palace may be "quietly drawing up contingency plans in the event of a split.”

Despite Harry's growing interest in rebuilding a life in Britain, Markle has reportedly made it clear she has no intention of relocating to England with her husband, leaving the couple facing increasingly different futures.

“But Meghan won’t want to come back from the US – and that schism is potentially dangerous,” they claimed.

As a result, the palace may have to take "extreme measures" to keep Markle satisfied in the event of a divorce while she remains in the U.S.

"The agreement would also grant Meghan the continued use of her Duchess of Sussex title. The Palace sees it as a face-saving measure, because tearing it away from her could spark a media war," the source dished.

"This isn’t about trying to come between Harry and Meghan; in fact, contrary to what a lot of people might think, King Charles is actually rooting for them," the insider spilled about the monarch, who himself went through a very public separation and divorce from Harry's mother, the late Princess Diana.

"He wants Harry to know that, if he ever reaches a point where he’s overwhelmed or confused, there’s no judgment waiting for him; he'll be there to listen and offer whatever wisdom he can," the insider revealed.

"He knows he can’t advise Harry on the Hollywood side of life or the business decisions he and Meghan are making, but relationships are another matter."

Neil Sean, who knows Tom Parker-Bowles personally, was the first to report that the Parker-Bowles family was very angry about the portrayal of Camilla as someone who was "interfering." That is not true, nor is the claim that William disagreed with the situation. In fact, Sean has stated categorically that not only do William and Camilla get along very well, but they also fully agree that Harry should never see Charles alone, not because they think Harry might achieve anything, but because Charles’s health is not robust enough to withstand Harry’s shouting.

It was Harry who was angry because he didn't want Camilla at the meeting. This is something Harry has insisted on for a long time: he does not want Camilla present when he sees the King. Regarding this, several royal reporters have noted that Harry always believes he can be manipulative—manipulating the Queen, manipulating Charles. For a time, Camilla kept her distance. In 2024, when Charles publicly announced he was undergoing cancer treatment and Harry appeared in the UK, Camilla left them alone. However, at the meeting in September 2025, Harry found Camilla in the room with Charles. That came as an unpleasant surprise. And now, at the meeting in July 2026, it was the same story: Camilla was by Charles's side.

Sean recounted—and clearly stated his source—that William and Camilla had a firm agreement on this: whatever Harry wants is of no consequence; Camilla will stand by the King's side. Camilla finds attending those meetings highly unpleasant because Harry is unpleasant, but he has had to swallow his bile, as Camilla has not the slightest intention of acceding to his demands.

And no, the door to any new reunion has not been opened. The rift is no longer just with William or Camilla; Anne and her children do not want Harry around either, nor do Beatrice and Eugenie. Harry has personally insulted every member of his family.

This was reflected in precisely what happened in July. Harry had announced that he would be traveling with his wife and children. There was not a single invitation from the British Royal Family for them to attend anything. The person who invited them was his uncle, Charles Spencer, but even that was not for a long stay—just a couple of days.

Harry and Meghan are furious because the British Royal Family showed absolutely no interest in meeting their children, and they are blaming William for it.

Deep down, Harry and Meghan do not understand why their trump card—the children—didn't work. They failed to move the King or William. Harry, in particular, cannot fathom why his children are treated with such indifference.

Meghan, on the other hand, is furious because she is being ignored.

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 13 days ago

Unless I see in His hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe. (St Thomas, Neil Sean's gossip)

I don't know if Harry has a girlfriend or not. But if that makes Lady C and Neil Sean fight, I'll buy popcorn to watch the show 😈😈🤣🤣🤣

https://preview.redd.it/9oe80fb28uhh1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=8dceca7b23099228afe87b61a340f33c405e2ee6

MARKLE IN OZ JUST HONESTLY WHY WOULD YOU DO THIS TO YOUR HOSTS?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFQ9o3k7c4k

In the midst of that fight—the Harkles.

Because let's face it: do we believe in Claw's great love for Harry? No. When has Harry ever been faithful? Never. So, is it plausible that Harry might look for someone else? Totally. Him having another woman to be his shoulder to cry on? Hmm... aren't there any photos? Strange.

Furthermore, Harry has an Oedipus complex that not even Sophocles would have wanted to recount.

https://preview.redd.it/6hsnacodhuhh1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=bbd1faf63ccbd48dc2a2d6d605f2fbb145242ebc

And that kind of gossip can be entertaining when Claw pulls stunts like this.

https://preview.redd.it/t6y7w9cg7uhh1.png?width=678&format=png&auto=webp&s=f3ca835832fa9eccbf62ad54e0a228a4cb1c436d

That was great publicity; Channel 10 has no complaints on that front.

But that doesn't change the problem. Because Claw gets these opportunities—she pulls them off—and then she blows them.

And in Australia, Sean has already said yes—that she ruined him.

Because at a certain stage in life, one has to be grateful for certain opportunities—especially when they are becoming increasingly scarce. And in Claw’s case, she doesn't seem to see that those opportunities have dwindled. There will be no second interview with Bloomberg, nor any with Vanity or on any podcast. And this goes on and on.

Right, let's get to the twist.

Well, Sean has already told the story of how Claw’s involvement with Channel 10 actually came about. He made it very clear that he knows people not only at that channel but also at *MasterChef*—so, if you recall, we got the scoop on that pretty quickly.

Channel 10 wanted Harry. And Claw had to bring Harry on board—even if just by phone.

Channel 10, seeing that Claw had behaved well—meaning he’d held up his end of the bargain—had a very, very preliminary chat about following him around Australia to try out some food. It would be a free-form concept: visiting cafés, things like that. Nothing earth-shattering.

According to what Sean learned from a network executive, it wasn't a question of money, either—because they never reached that stage. They never got to the point of discussing money because Claw never responded. They were offering her a show that was simple to produce—something typical for an influencer (didn't she do that with *The Tig*?)—but she didn't reply.

That was April; we are now in August. And a lot of things happened between April and July.

https://preview.redd.it/d5w267sqbuhh1.png?width=225&format=png&auto=webp&s=384d524a25648ca8faa7ae628da8f89e99cec487

SOOOORRY!!!! I couldn't resist 😁

For starters, Claw never promoted her participation in MasterChef; she never thanked them for the invitation, nor has she done anything regarding it. She has completely erased Australia from her memory.

Sean thinks Claw might be mulling it over. He’s like my brother in that regard: I avoid asking him things because, if I do, I’d better take a seat, just in case he actually answers me five years down the line.

So, it seems that opportunity no longer exists.

MARKLE, MARTHA WILLIAM & TOM BRABY LATEST NEWS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJ8DR7HhYnk

Nothing is what it seems in the world of celebrities.

There are feuds, romances—there’s a bit of everything.

Well, Martha Stewart is back in the headlines.

https://preview.redd.it/1q7g9cbeduhh1.png?width=399&format=png&auto=webp&s=27eb10d7dd6bbe87f6414b3c67d25defd87ece4d

And no, not because she is promoting her latest book, "The Martha Way: Essential Principles for Mastering Home and Living," the book was about creating a “definitive master class in elevating the everyday,” per a statement shared with PEOPLE.

Did anyone know Martha had a new book out? I didn't.

And it seems a lot of other people didn't either, because Martha had to stir up some controversy. And when it comes to controversy, there's Claw.

Take Gwyneth Paltrow, for example.

https://preview.redd.it/xky4mfvzduhh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=69b1b742a5e7cccc3c5f5402a814d2409a2448f5

It wasn't earlier this year; it was last year. Sean says it seems like it happened this year, but they actually appeared together in May 2025. Paltrow explained that she and Meghan haven't spent much time together in person "yet," adding, "So far, our friendship is based on text messages. I've been traveling quite a bit."

Nonsense! They weren't friends or anything of the sort. Gwyneth was just self-promoting. And after that photo, we never heard another word about that "friendship."

Martha, on the other hand, made some unkind remarks when Claw was impersonating her in *With Love*.

Anyway, in the last couple of weeks, Martha ran into Claw at a dinner, and Claw was talking about that meeting with the King.

Martha is a snake who knows how to navigate those waters. That’s how she got attention—by using Claw, who was using the King.

https://preview.redd.it/yjn1mt0mhuhh1.png?width=1380&format=png&auto=webp&s=29a3f6a2a6b7d5dba86f15dc028d29b3e0678b37

Sean says this also helps Claw because, if that meeting actually took place and so on, it verifies everything without her having to be the one to tell the story. But in reality, that’s exactly what Claw was after—having someone else recount the details so she didn't have to. Sean claims this shows Claw will never stay silent. We already knew that.

Now, Claw is in a private setting, so it is Martha who is spreading the gossip; yet this is exactly what Claw always does—she never says anything directly. She is shrewd in that regard, because she cannot be accused of anything.

But it is a headache for the Royal Family—or rather, for William. He had warned Charles about this in no uncertain terms, and so had Camilla. Claw and Harry are simply not people who can be trusted. And Claw is obviously eager to tell her story and have "her" version aired—especially among the A-listers; that is what she wants, to use that gathering for that purpose. Sean had predicted this before the meeting even took place, and both William and Camilla knew it.

The problem here lies with the King; he knew this, he knew it was going to happen, but his concern for Harry outweighed everything else. And now, Claw believes she controls the narrative and that she is beyond reproach.

In the short term, Claw will capitalize on this. However, the whole situation is making William loathe her—and Harry—even more, and ensures he wants no "Harkles" anywhere near him. Claw fails to grasp that these cheap stunts are infuriating precisely because that is what they are: cheap stunts that expose just how unpleasant and untrustworthy she and Harry really are. Charles might still want to see Harry, but he is the only one who does; the rest of the family wants nothing to do with them. And that is beyond repair.

HARRY MELTDOWN OVER THIS MAIL DRAMA ESCALATES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsmaKCUsQv0

Alright, the countdown has begun. Ten days. On August 17, we will find out what happens regarding the amount the plaintiffs will have to pay the Daily Mail.

https://preview.redd.it/o35c3o60kuhh1.png?width=484&format=png&auto=webp&s=c5c032890cc3d4b18edf6444a4510a29caacdc01

The problem for Harry is that the plaintiffs are pointing the finger at him as the one who dragged them into this disaster. It seems the plaintiffs realized there were flaws in the lawsuit—that they didn't have much of a case—but Harry pushed them to keep going. That is why several of them believed Harry had an ace up his sleeve.

https://preview.redd.it/kh2gl8eqkuhh1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=01b34f9225685ee1c23fe78697f4012c17070ee1

Harry felt emboldened by having supposedly won the cases against the Mirror and The Sun. But regarding that—how can you win a case that never went to trial because you decided to accept a settlement, Harry, on the very day the trial hearing was set to begin?

https://preview.redd.it/ztog0or9luhh1.png?width=220&format=png&auto=webp&s=aadd9c1fcbc39ddf64d6fa6aad33c9d8f39c60f5

Sherbone is missing now, and the relationship with Harry is strained. Naturally: Sherbone must blame Harry for not being a good witness, and Harry blames him for everything.

The point is, Harry has shown he is incapable of facing reality. It’s not that he doesn’t see it; he rejects it. After all, his friends were indiscreet—even with Neil Sean.

I mean, Harry’s employees are being indiscreet right now.

Claw certainly was indiscreet! One of the things William loves most about Kate is precisely that she understands the value of privacy and discretion. She was flooded with offers to tell her story about William back in 2007, when he broke up with her. He deserved for her to tear him apart in the press, but Kate—maintaining her dignity—didn't take the bait. Claw, on the other hand, hadn't even been with Harry for ten minutes before she had already called the paparazzi and Vanity Fair.

https://preview.redd.it/lpsmaui1muhh1.png?width=308&format=png&auto=webp&s=8fb1125f838d38429c3d3e7cd8eaff078a316d11

Sean has already said that there were more stories about Harry in the works at the Mail. They have sworn statements from people wanting to share tales—like the Charlotte Griffiths scoop—and Lady C confirmed that gossip too, so Sean and she aren't at odds on that front 😁😁 Now Sean says the Mail hasn't even had to look very hard; more people have already come forward with stories about Harry.

Among them are former staff members from both the Palace and Montecito. And the Palace staff have been very happy since their non-disclosure agreements expired, so for the past couple of years, they’ve been telling all.

And all of this is happening for a reason that is—yes, it really is—Harry's fault.

Because those people stayed silent not because of NDAs, but because they feared the consequences of speaking out. The Harkles are vindictive—just ask Mark Dolan, who has been on the receiving end of the "Squad" lately. But several of those people have realized that the Harkles no longer have the money or the strength to take them on in court. Neil Sean couldn't have cared less when he received a veiled threat from the Harkles' team for saying that Australians would be footing part of the bill for the Harkles' security there... and that is exactly what happened. And Sean didn't care because—what were the Harkles going to do, sue him? Tom Bower and Lady C have been waiting for years for Harry and Claw to sue them.

Since Harry is losing lawsuits, what could he actually do against people who speak out against him? He hasn't been able to do anything about Charlotte Griffiths' story. And that was a serious matter.

Sean has also said before that many of those sources don't leak information for money. He’s mentioned that, in his case, deals are often struck over a cup of coffee 🤣🤣🤭 because he doesn't pay his sources. It seems *The Mail* won't have to pay either, as Sean points out that these individuals are driven by a desire for "revenge" against Harry and Claw. They were treated poorly by the couple, and Sean has said that being mistreated is the primary motivation for people to leak information.

https://preview.redd.it/v6yeyv42puhh1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=d061eeddd32ba50bf04060b3e0337d2a75f4b48d

That said, Harry isn't going to go broke over this. Sean says the Harkles will maintain the same standard of living. Personally, I think that is exactly what will drive them to bankruptcy 🤭🤭 But the Daily Mail blow has definitely hurt Harry more than he expected.

https://preview.redd.it/h394wycspuhh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=29cd4f2c973bd037603e2d47592d801567639d69

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 13 days ago

The Problem with *As Ever* (Contribution from a Sinner)

External-Syllabub289, who doesn't yet have permission to publish, wrote this in a recent post about Neil Sean's gossip.

Since it's very interesting, I'm posting it here for other sinners to see. Because you'll see what a mess "As Ever" is.

I did a deep dive on her trademark issues and now i understand the problem. Besides asking for 19 items to be protected under her trademark and only sending a check for 17 (which her lawyers allowed to Balloon into a 10 month delay with ARO while they waited until the last minute to send in the correct fee), she jumped the gun by having the products made bc she thought it was a done deal. And also, she desperately  needed the products to go with the Netflix show. Only, they cocked it up and even though kiwi proved it could be done, they used that stupid excuse (can't trademark a location) with ARO before pivoting to AE. 

Well the problem came bc she wanted to STEAL As Ever rather than offering that guy in NY to buy it. Had she bought it, it would be a mere technicality to add food and any other thing she wanted to add to the already existing As Ever clothing trademark. But bc she STOLE the name for all those other categories, she had to skip his area, which was clothing, but then she went and gobbled up 18 other categories of use, to prevent him from EVER being able to expand and "take advantage of her fame". 

That greed and nastiness caused her to tie those 19 applications together. She can sever them, but she's running out of time for everything she needs to do. She can get 3 more 6 month extensions, then that's it. 

Right now she's in limbo, bc to trademark those 19 areas (housewares, food, toys, textiles, dog treats), you have to prove the use of those things. In other words, she needs websites, documented labeled items to sell, and PROOF OF ONGOING SALES. Well, she can only do that for the food/ Jam and honey category. She is literally unable to trademark anything else until she starts making and selling these things. You get an initial "approval" that reserves the name for you, but if you can't show proof of use (websites, sales), you will not ever get the final approval. 

But, she jumped the gun bc she had to - she had already bought the inventory for ARO and when that failed, she pivoted to AE with all this stuff that already had a contract in place for manufacturing - and she could not get out of those contracts.  So, the jars were about to be manufactured, and she had nothing, no ARO trademark. So, she bet the farm on AE and, fatal mistake, had the labels made before the trademark was approved. (Now, if she pivots again, she would have to pay someone ungodly amounts of money to scrape off the existing labels and put new ones on. Plus, everything is on its way to expiring.) 

So then smeg, greedy as always, filed for 19 related trademarks to avoid paying that guy any money and to crush him from ever expanding sales into another area. But it hurt her much worse than it hurt him bc she simply cannot manufacture 18 other categories of stuff now that Netflix dropped her. So, now she can split off just the food and she would get that trademark, but if she does that, it opens her up to either having to make those other items and get a proven sales record within another 18-24 months, or she can drop the applications and come back later and reapply. But there are hundreds of people waiting to jump on trademarking those categories with the As Ever name if she lets them go, even for a second. (They would do the same thing to her that she did to the As Ever clothing guy.) So, she is just running out the clock out of desperation in the hopes that someone buys her AE site or even buys into her company as an investor and bails her out with helping her manufacture those other 18 categories. 

There was way more in depth info on how and why she can't easily split off the food trademark without causing a bunch of issues, and if i ever jump thru the posting privileges hoops and finally get approved to post here, I look forward to sharing it. But if anyone is interested, message me and I'll send you all the chatgpt info I complied on the trademark situation she's dealing with and how it's about to explode in her face. 

I hope External-Syllabub289 gets permission to publish soon, because it seems has a good track record in that regard.

And that "Duchess Spread with Salmonella" has a serious problem with its products. And its brand. And with herself.

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 14 days ago

It’s still not the Harkles' year. (Neil Sean's gossip)

AS EVER DRIES UP EVEN FURTHER..IS MARKLE NOW PASSED CARING?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYrtuhUbL7Q

My family and I work for a family business. The early years were difficult—the subsequent ones were too, but the first ones were very hard. It took a lot of effort and a lot of hard work.

Sean wonders if Claw takes his business seriously. I ask myself the same question.

Because, of course, mistakes happen in business. But Claw—and Sean is right—her ventures have more holes than Swiss cheese. The most absurd thing of all: paying—I think it was $200—to renew Archewell and sending the check by mail. A check and the mail. In this day and age of online payments, especially for those kinds of procedures. Seriously, does anyone still use checks? Here in Chile, they’re only used for very specific transactions, and paying licensing fees isn't one of them.

And she often gets mixed up between *American Riviera Orchard* and *As Ever*, because what name will that company have next year? Claw thinks that posting a photo of a jam jar—or gathering weeds and passing them off as flowers for a planter—means the job is done.

And Sean doesn't criticize Claw for simply being Claw; rather, it stems from the fact that he has worked with famous people who are constantly launching something, and he has witnessed many failures. He is absolutely right about Kate Moss—who would believe she leads a healthy lifestyle? That is why her products failed.

American Riviera Orchard is not generating revenue.

But the worst part is that the brand has squandered every opportunity it has been given to sell its products.

https://preview.redd.it/rzv22ynh6nhh1.png?width=1740&format=png&auto=webp&s=72a0ad472724776b386078094a9dc0d7286f06f3

Let’s not forget that the brand had access to the premises of the elegant Godmothers bookstore. Last week, a visitor to the shop noted that the product range had shrunk significantly over the past two months and that Meghan’s famous jams were no longer available. Bookstore staff confirmed that the reduced selection was not due to the items having sold out.

In other words, even though Claw has been asked to restock—and has been offered space and staff—she hasn't done so. Sean says this is further proof of Claw's lack of direct interest, drawing power, or whatever you want to call it.

And Sean is clear: she can't pretend she's been busy, because how long was she on vacation, a whole month, more than a month?

https://preview.redd.it/7h8ltzwa9nhh1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=de222e3c2bfba8acf6429a63f1814c298330489b

NO COINCIDENCE..”SHE CROSSED THE LINE” MARKLE EUGENIE & HARRY EXPLODE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCf0f0eP1CY

There is a lot of debate about Claw's age. Sean has joked about it too 😈😈😈😈, but now, in all seriousness, yes, she is 45.

I would consider that an invasion of their privacy... but given that the Harkles now spend 24/7 filming themselves on an iPhone, they have turned their own privacy into a game.

And if it were at least a situation worth it—but no, here’s another embarrassing moment.

https://preview.redd.it/7wodgj7ianhh1.png?width=634&format=png&auto=webp&s=c0aea365159443de2f2e066c69ac3864ed196926

Even Sean doesn't get the message—except for Harry's "Oh God" part, because Sean says, "It must be that he already knows what he's going to have to pay the Daily Mail" 🤣🤣🤣

That said, Harry and Claw haven't changed at all, because they still have wealthy friends whom they exploit for their own benefit.

But what about those who are abandoned? Some harbor resentment.

Eugenie and Jack are now a family of five.

https://preview.redd.it/or2bxlx5cnhh1.png?width=678&format=png&auto=webp&s=c4bf7c3ad26702194e010a04350d739727330574

And behind the scenes, there is a lot of chaos involving Eugenie, Sarah, and Andrew.

Sean says bridges are being burned on that front. And proof of this is that Eugenie decided to announce the baby girl's birth on Claw's birthday. It was no coincidence.

But it wasn't directed at Claw. It seems Eugenie no longer has any interest in that friendship. So, it appears that even though the Harkles made a show of being in Portugal, they didn't spend time with Eugenie.

The attack was aimed at Harry. That’s because Eugenie and Beatrice feel Harry should have supported them when their father and mother fell from grace. They had stood by him, even when doing so caused them significant trouble with the family—especially with William. Yet, not only did Harry fail to lend them a hand, but he also joined in on the mudslinging against Andrew.

Eugenie, above all, is very upset about a great many other things. But on this point, Eugenie and Beatrice agree: Harry betrayed them.

So, this was a way of getting back at him—doing something they knew would hurt Harry and Claw: bumping them off the cover.

It might seem a bit silly... but it must have stung Harry that the King acknowledged the birth of Eugenie’s daughter without a single mention of Claw. Harry views the Yorks—all of them—as outcasts who ought to be treated the same way the BRF treats the Sussexes. Well, the King and William don’t see it that way. So, if Eugenie intended to send a message with this—beyond the simple fact that she now has three children—then good for her.

HARRY NEEDS TO DO THIS FAST - NOT GOING GREAT WTH ANDY ..LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSepWwTQYlc

Andy Burnham may be a Labour man, he may not be particularly pro-monarchy (though he would certainly accept the title of Sir without hesitation), and he may be many other things. But one thing he is not is: someone who has time for Harry. Andy has time for his vacation (just like Pedro Sánchez in Spain—if only Kast would take a vacation for the rest of the millennium), but not for Harry.

The Daily Mail isn't going to stop, because its reputation as a tabloid is at stake 🤭🤭🤭 But seriously, yes, the Daily Mail is going to make Harry and the plaintiffs pay the £34 million. They are determined to do it, and they have a huge help in Harry's big mouth.

Now, the funny thing about it—for me, as a lawyer—is that Sherborne’s team couldn't believe how well-prepared the journalists who testified were.

And I say it’s funny to me because... did that really happen? Why was the legal team more concerned about that than about realizing their own witnesses were terrible? The only one who was truly prepared was David Furnish; he was the only one who answered with the coherence expected of a witness. As for the rest... well, you know—we discussed it here back in January–March 2026.

https://preview.redd.it/8drtlupxgnhh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=ed0d79e0f985a317cb924723aebd9d50c140dc98

It must have been truly horrifying for Harry. Sean says it must have been a major signal to Harry regarding who he was up against: people who kept receipts from twenty years ago. In other words, not just people with good memories, but people who had solid evidence in their hands.

And there were many more people willing to testify in favor of ANL. Sean wonders if they did it for money or because they genuinely dislike Harry. I think it’s the latter, because I actually believe the witnesses lost money over all this. I mean, they had to remain silent for several weeks, and a number of the witnesses who still work at the Mail were off duty for a while.

Sean says he doesn't believe for a second that Charles is going to pay this to Harry, because Charles isn't known for opening his wallet—and he already has his hands full with Andrew.

Right, the 2027 Invictus Games.

I’ll skip the politics of what’s happening in Birmingham because—if you know anything about the situation in Chile—I’d rather not talk about shady money being squandered thanks to our lovely lawmakers. That’s the anarchist side of me coming out—my father's side 😁😁.

But Sean says that by then, we’ll have a clearer public picture of what’s happening with the Sentebale case—which, as leaks here and there suggest, is looking very bad for Harry. It’s going to be another huge scandal. And we come back to the main point: Harry has to find donors willing to put up 25 million. Well, if the rumor mill is right—and we’ll likely know something about the progress of that case as early as September—it will be a total disaster for Harry, because donors won’t even want to be near him.

And also, William's official portrait.

https://preview.redd.it/x58xdbwcjnhh1.png?width=235&format=png&auto=webp&s=9ae4bd3fa9f873c9e4a8fa1b6ce5fa0854a7b80d

Sean says that with good lighting, anyone looks good, and anyone can see what they want to see 🤭😏😏 What Harry sees is that William looks too much like Diana. And that makes him sick.

https://preview.redd.it/y1v1e7p6knhh1.png?width=387&format=png&auto=webp&s=c71439b78209f489cac5fb58f89338d9d7675e94

reddit.com
u/Human-Economics6894 — 14 days ago