When I saw the headline here, I thought Uncle Charles Spencer was going to get married. Not that he'd already gotten married. He got married in Arizona, which isn't that far from California... and he didn't invite Harry and Claw. Uncle Charles really likes Harry, doesn't he? Just like BRF likes the Harkles. 🤭🤭

https://preview.redd.it/6z63l5yvg62h1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=27498e458438a900de9336574165a41a2c23dd87

MARKLE CREATES MORE UPSET FOR ROYALS VIA HARRY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfeyMCl6BnY

I've lost count, how many weddings have the Harkles not been invited to? I remember Hugh Grosvenor's, now Uncle Charles's. And next up is Peter's, where no, there's no invitation for Harry or Claw, specifically because Peter hasn't spoken to Harry in years.

https://preview.redd.it/gt0y9xfwf62h1.png?width=189&format=png&auto=webp&s=eae3f9889d94047ce57872997156392f8d4249b8

Sean meets Peter, he meets Zara, and he meets Mike Tindall. In fact, Sean says he knows Mike best because he's from the same area as Sean. And Sean knows Peter's future wife and he knew the previous Mrs. Philips.

Harry always thought weddings would be occasions he'd always be invited to. The kind of family connection, especially with Peter. Because Peter was very present as Harry and William's older cousin, particularly after Diana's death. Peter was very present during those times, and then over the years, Peter was always a great support.

And then, Harry met Claw.

https://preview.redd.it/qmzig5esh62h1.png?width=316&format=png&auto=webp&s=d4921bd69d81980c5adb3a2d8a82c1c3f8d3ea11

And Peter committed a great sin: he wasn't impressed by Claw in the slightest. He wasn't effusive with her or anything like that. In fact, Claw claimed that he hadn't been kind to her. Sean here says that he's "suggesting" it based on what he's "talked to people about." But the gossip is from a reliable source that Peter was one of those condemned to stay away from Harry after the wedding.

Nor should we assume that Peter was bothered by that. Because by then Peter had adopted William's stance: Harry got married, now it's Claw's problem.

Now, Sean says that the word at Palace is that King Charles III and Camilla haven't yet decided whether they'll attend the wedding, and the same goes for William and Kate. Beatrice and Eugenie have confirmed their attendance.

However, Sean says that although Harry and Peter haven't spoken in a long time, Peter still cares for Harry. So, if William and Kate don't go to the wedding, Peter would have considered inviting Harry. Keep in mind that in many families, you don't want any trouble on your wedding day, so you invite person X... but not person Y. Because to avoid headlines like "Harry wasn't invited," Peter, out of affection, would invite Harry... but not Claw.

To be clear: Sean mentions in passing towards the end that his sources in Montecito have told him that Harry has not received any invitation to that wedding... or to any wedding.

And Peter would invite Harry but not Claw because everyone knows that Claw, who doesn't want to make the trip, will make all sorts of demands, and if she were to be given in, she'd do all sorts of things to distract the bride.

https://preview.redd.it/yffcftfyl62h1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=949c047dae229a6a4fb0413c2a3886c81fa53ec9

So, let's not kid ourselves: Peter could invite Harry... but he shouldn't expect him to be at the wedding. Peter doesn't want the Harkles' circus

https://preview.redd.it/xxha58dlm62h1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=5bb51748dff3e5a565ffa3c033089aade38dbbd8

MARKLE HEAVILY LACED CHILLING MESSAGE TO THE KING & ROYALS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=da_rrA6Lc68

Did you really think Claw didn't demand to be called Duchess of Sussex in Geneva?

https://preview.redd.it/qekuui7ro62h1.png?width=320&format=png&auto=webp&s=66781e0a174f1bb653834d971180699dc2eba593

Of course she did. What's really upsetting Claw is that, aside from the many criticisms she's received for that trip, on top of everything else, people are calling her "Meghan Markle." She can't seem to accept the fact that people don't want to call her Duchess, much less Princess.

And today's barrage of photos and videos was two message to the BRF.

First:

"Look at us, we're still together, it's Harry and me, always together, they can't beat us. And look what they've missed, look how fabulous we are."

Second:

"Do you see all the pictures I have? I have more, and I'll use them, of course I'll use them."

https://preview.redd.it/3e0pn0bwr62h1.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=1bae11bfb5b2ec3ab699b9857da5c613cbf9596e

There's no olive branch. In fact, Sean doesn't say it, I do, but this is even Claw's reaction to the fact that it was reported that the Harkles' wedding photos, which were still at Highgrove, have already disappeared (Sean mentioned it in a video a few days ago).

Sean says Claw can write her version of the story, recount things in her supposed biography, but the fact is, no one would believe her. And the only thing that might make that book interesting is if she dedicated herself to responding to Tom Bower, Robert Hardman, or Hugo Vickers. But she can't do that. She can have her team send supposed versions of those events to the press, but she herself can't respond to what they and others have written because she's terrified that some survivor of the Sussexes will say, "I was there, I know what happened."

Claw couldn't stand another Jason Knauf with documents to back up his version of events

But Claw still thinks he's playing poker, so he tries to bluff. The problem is, he forgets that you need a poker face to do it.

https://preview.redd.it/tq40pl2vu62h1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=b837993e05d993f155e70cc7a3951eae90b419bb

And she made it clear in Switzerland that she doesn't have it at all.

SUSSEX STAFF READY TO QUIT AFTER THIS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54rfhtoXqoA

The more photos that come out of Geneva, the worse that trip looks.

https://preview.redd.it/5akxe18lv62h1.png?width=194&format=png&auto=webp&s=8f9863d50efe7909117dcac2cfee4d3a67cf7cf6

Claw stood there with no audience, no security, and no speech. So desperate was the situation that Claw tried to turn things around by frantically posting about her wedding eight years prior.

Claw stood there with no audience, no security, and no speech. So desperate was the situation that Claw tried to spin things by frantically posting about his wedding from eight years prior.

But it's his team that's truly suffering. Because it's his team—three full-time staff and two part-timers—who have to come up with ways to improve the Harkles' image. And they're failing. It was the team's mistake not to properly vet the event... But Claw found a way to make it worse with her obsession with selfies.

https://preview.redd.it/38mfkv7ww62h1.png?width=634&format=png&auto=webp&s=00a47159ffbaba5f79a609de213dcfe68b9368d1

Her spokesman has said it is impossible to vet everyone who asks her for a selfie, adding: 'To be absolutely clear, the Duchess does not know Mr Rydman, had no prior awareness of him attending the event, and was unfamiliar with the concerning reports relating to him.'

No, that's not true. At a private event like this, with a pre-approved guest list, you can choose who you take selfies with. In fact, nobody forces anyone to take selfies.

So, as Sean has already heard from some of those staff members, they're ready to throw in the towel.

Claw decided to make that trip, decided to do things on her own. And it was a disaster. She doesn't listen to advice, she's incapable of sitting down to discuss strategies, and Harry won't accept advice either... You can't work magic with the Harkles.

https://preview.redd.it/qeyludakr62h1.png?width=620&format=png&auto=webp&s=1e9f43a11e9a0bf4e6a9515a2bc208f669f57498

And that's why Claw fails. Because instead of worrying about what she's doing and enjoying what she's doing, she's thinking about something else.

MARKLE & THE SWISS DRAMA BEHIND THE SCENES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mah73RckLKQ

She was thinking, "I'll get worldwide headlines for this, I'll show that boring Kate that I'm superior to her."

https://preview.redd.it/nx0pp9i3cz1h1.png?width=300&format=png&auto=webp&s=23be86e7f15ebab86ef9323b9e59f8b01f83e316

Claw was so obsessed with it that, once again, she didn't even bother to find out what she actually had to do, or where she would do it. Because of this, she, believing she would be speaking to thousands of people, found herself facing, at best, 20.

Claw is way too obsessed with always being on magazine covers. She doesn't care about anything else. That's why she's being openly rejected by A-listers. Who wants to be around a woman who just wants to be always the center of attention?

Who wants to be around someone who only wants support but has never supported anyone in return? Sean remembers Misan Harriman, who gave him a lot of support, but now that he needs support because he claims he was misrepresented by the press, the Harkles are silent. On April 29, two Jewish men were stabbed in Golders Green, northwest London, an attack that Prime Minister Starmer condemned as antisemitic. However, it was systematically omitted that the same attacker, Essa Suleiman, had stabbed a Muslim man earlier that day on Dover Street, south London. Suleiman had a history of serious knife offenses dating back to 2008, when he stabbed two police officers and a police dog. Metropolitan Police Commissioner Mark Rowley said Suleiman had a history of serious mental health problems: he had been hospitalized in a high-security psychiatric institution and had been discharged just days before the attacks.

Harriman publicly asked a question in Instagram: "Why did the media focus exclusively on the Jewish victims while the Muslim victim received hardly any coverage?" The Telegraph and the Daily Mail have strongly criticized his words.

Sean didn't mention that to stir up controversy. He was just offering another example, a recent one, of the Harkles and their friends. And the problem is: I could understand the Harkles not supporting Tyler Perry, because he's being accused of some nasty things. But why don't they support Misan? At least by defending his right to free speech. "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Or say "he is our friend but I disagree with him for these reasons." Or simply claim that he has been misunderstood... just as Harry has always claimed that the press misunderstands him and Claw.

But no. The Harkles haven't. They never do. They don't support the King when he needs them to, they don't support Thomas Markle, they don't support Misan Harriman, they don't support anyone.

That's what Sean says. All it takes is for one "friend" to have problems, any friend and any problem, and the Harkles disappear. Both of them. Harry isn't loyal to his friends in that way either. Claw is even worse.

So there are quite a few who have enjoyed what happened in Switzerland

https://preview.redd.it/a4teuh4ddz1h1.png?width=725&format=png&auto=webp&s=cb98cf3621ca0ce201eb320a8ad4aca6a5992aa1

But, as always, with the Harkles things can always get worse.

Do you see it? Are you grasping the problem that Claw didn't realize she's created?

https://preview.redd.it/3ovuqzosgz1h1.png?width=572&format=png&auto=webp&s=14a0a3ea3ea2f9ba46f0991bdea1f75ec2ad4fe5

Here is Claw, on a traffic island, on a street where vehicles were circulating, with very few people, AND WITHOUT SECURITY.

https://preview.redd.it/gixn5c0dlz1h1.png?width=1146&format=png&auto=webp&s=3e134cfcae10052e588a7b8498c5cebbf4047e16

Claw was very exposed. Without security. But she was there, of her own free will. If she's in so much danger, if she can be attacked anywhere in the world, as H claims, what was she doing there under those conditions?

Sean's right: people were putting on coats, taking out phones, talking on the phone. It was open countryside. Oh, it's Switzerland... so what? Harry didn't say he was safe in one country or another. He claims that, practically because of who he is, he's exposed to danger everywhere. He, his wife, and his children.

But the funniest thing of all is that Claw was clearly furious. Furious because there was practically no press at the event. So much so that this image from TiarasNTears is perfect.

https://x.com/TiarasNTears/status/2056325846651043968/photo/1

But she had hoped that at least she would get the front pages of the UK newspapers... no, practically all of them ignored her, except for the Daily Mail, which put her on the front page saying "Meghan Markle was unusually 'tense and nervous' in Switzerland"

According to Sean, she found out, and that made her even angrier 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Now... isn't there a Swiss sinner around? We need reporters.

Because according to what Sean found out, Claw spoke for 10 minutes. That was her speech. And it was so incredibly boring, she was so monotonous with what she was saying, that the people there were wondering how much longer she was going to take.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

And to make matters worse, it turns out Claw didn't even have her speech ready when she arrived in Switzerland. She finished it almost seconds before starting. And even then, it was incredibly boring.

https://preview.redd.it/g52dkm6skz1h1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=bba7229d68a78e19da85192af2f1ced69a5d0b7a

And just when Claw couldn't ruin his trip any further, the icing on the cake arrived.

https://preview.redd.it/eerg8i1ykz1h1.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=4d7ccbb8fee7a5859d03e3fb5e3a8e6d755971f3

A trip can go wrong. Two maybe, but the Harkles, together or apart, have failed on every trip. Unbelievable.

WILLIAM’S BLUNT & BRUTAL FIRM REJECTION BECAUSE OF THIS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPQqPsXa6tI

Things aren't getting any better for Harry at Invictus.

Yes, Invictus has new members.

https://preview.redd.it/qtqoaao6mz1h1.png?width=836&format=png&auto=webp&s=760a21c2f9aebfdd1fd73017aab421de70b34da4

But the problem remains Harry. And the more failures he and Claw suffer, the more crucial it is that the King and William lend him a hand.

Because Harry isn't going to get a single new sponsor, and Invictus desperately needs them.

And Invictus sees that Harry and Claw aren't attracting anyone. And if there's no attraction to draw people in, there won't be any ticket sales, no sponsors... Harry is being a problem, that's why they need the BRF.

The absurd thing is that, according to an excellent source, and it seems this source is from the Invictus committee of Birmingham, Harry is still hoping that the King and William will even send a video message of support.

I can hear you saying, "Please, that's not true!!!" Guys, Harry announced he'd have 24/7 security late last year, and he sent word to the press. Harry lives in Harryland, where the truth about Harry has no relation to reality.

Sean has already said it's definitely not going to happen. The King and William want nothing to do with Invictus because they don't see it as a BRF project, nor do they want anything to do with someone facing legal troubles. Harry seems to have forgotten about Sentebale. But not BRF, not William.

And behind the scenes at Palace, the King, William, the Edinburghs, Anne—everyone is waiting to see what will happen: when the true state of Invicuts' accounts will be revealed. That's how things stand.

MARKLE “SHOW ME THE GOODS” ANOTHER BOMBSHELL LOOMS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1dr4Pn6In4

https://preview.redd.it/yr2hah08sz1h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=7866496cc21a11ad7d51e102e772c8f8bdf12469

Claw's fourth wedding.

Yes, it seems Claw insists on having a non-documentary version of her vow renewal with Harry.

And she pitched the idea to Netflix, who asked her, "What about the guest list?"

Sean says no one believes the Harkles want a third wedding because he remembers they were married three days before the televised wedding. So the vow renewal would be their third wedding.

Claw doesn't want to return to the UK; she wants nothing to do with royal life because she finds it boring. But Claw knows she needs the royal connection. So she wants Harry to find a way to hold their vow renewal ceremony with royals present. Because they need updated photos.

Ideally, Harry would have a photo of himself with the King. So people never forget that he is Charles's son.

https://preview.redd.it/0fajvvlquz1h1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=74859dc6339948158a5954d657d72c5b9f5a7732

Ideally, Claw would have...

https://preview.redd.it/1xefr6onvz1h1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=47c1d83565295f256ba81d97d71809514321d712

Yes, a tea party with Kate, George, and Charlotte, and everyone eating As Ever jam. That's what a member of the Montecito staff told Sean. Sean is exaggerating a bit 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣, but that's roughly the gist of it. Claw is in a huge conflict because deep down she knows she needs Kate.

This isn't about reconciliation. This is about monetizing the monarchy. They can't do that if they're not close to the monarchy.

Claw believes that if they have that photo, it would put an end to all the stories, all the rumors against her, and then it would open doors for her to get that article and cover in Vogue, and invitations to big interview programs...

I don't even think that's gossip. I think the Harkles have been openly demonstrating for far too long that they are genetically incapable of realizing how many bridges they've destroyed.

https://preview.redd.it/0il8vygrwz1h1.png?width=664&format=png&auto=webp&s=bc1750158ace3fc14d6636f2f2c7ae6df49e141f

I agree with that. I agree that there are dangers on social media. That's why I never had an account on Messenger, Facebook, X, or Twitter... even though I suffered brutal harassment to get them. I was discriminated against at work because I refused to have a Facebook account. They treated me like I was antisocial.

And the fact that AI has fallen too quickly into the wrong hands, is terrifying. It takes maturity and education to realize whether an image is real or not, something that many children, young people and adults lack.

But I find it very difficult to agree with a woman who posted this just the day before.

https://preview.redd.it/3iyk9yy1es1h1.png?width=450&format=png&auto=webp&s=760e524c52a49fbf4012ca55b0a5a3d460111ae8

The Claw, gentlemen!!!

Even Freddy doesn't have claws like Claw's 🤣🤣🤣

https://preview.redd.it/afi3utscfs1h1.png?width=781&format=png&auto=webp&s=9990cdcf9dc809915cfc399b4bc7a8904c4d6ae3

WILLIAM BLOWS HIS STACK - GOOD REASON TOO

And this woman's credibility is even less when we know she has an unhealthy fascination with using a group of people with serious ethical, moral, and mental health issues as her online enforcers. The Squad is perverse. And so is a certain group of journalists.

We've already seen that Chris Ship, despite witnessing firsthand how incompetent Harry is, continues to support them, even downplaying Kate's solo trip to Italy. She didn't attend a major event, but she performed her duties flawlessly. Harry, on the other hand, practically ran away at the first awkward question Ship himself asked him.

And then there's Christopher Andersen. Andersen has spent years telling the same story. This time, in his latest book: “Kate! The Courage, Grace, and Power of the Woman Who Will be Queen.”

https://preview.redd.it/opjyklvrgs1h1.png?width=659&format=png&auto=webp&s=0e3747d4ba2e1202b855defc0e16f3352f180b06

Which one? Prince William has such a fierce temper that he allegedly even “terrifies” his father, King Charles.

Andersen repeats the same thing time and again: “When he gets frustrated, he does resort to shouting” at the king, said a former Highgrove staffer who allegedly witnessed several shouting matches. “William has a huge, booming voice,” the staffer continued. “Much louder than his father’s, so it’s not something you soon forget.”

And always for the same reason: to show that Harry is a victim of William.

And once again, it's back to the idea that William inherited Charles's explosive temper, which was reflected in the pencil incident.

https://preview.redd.it/fvyhtmxxgs1h1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=6e53322be292cdab9f901b31a369154856532594

You'll have your own opinion. Mine is that Charles didn't lose his temper, but rather saw the obvious: the table was too small for a very large piece of paper that had to be signed with a fountain pen and ink. It would have been quite a sight if he'd signed and the ink had spilled. And we all saw that Major Hottie was immediately there to help.

Just look at the way William signed.

https://preview.redd.it/q0b0v33dhs1h1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=76b022edd963495f821d222a52842b73d4155331

William is fed up with being portrayed that way. Yes, William did have arguments with Charles, and fights with Tom Parker Bowles and his sister. But those happened when he was a teenager, around 20 years old. A lot has happened since then, and William has matured as a person.

https://preview.redd.it/yiinqmxnis1h1.png?width=1292&format=png&auto=webp&s=87ccbd94a3b23214e8535c343072b33e8af5f4e6

So William is not at all happy with this headline that's been circulating. And all thanks to... yes, Andersen.

Sean says that William does get angry quickly, but just as quickly as he gets angry, he gets over it. What really bothers him is when he asks someone to do something and it doesn't get done. He'd rather they say there was a problem than find out the work wasn't done. Now, raise your hand if you're not annoyed by something like that... no one? I mean, if you ask someone to do something, isn't it annoying when they don't do it?

https://preview.redd.it/q9fpver2ks1h1.png?width=583&format=png&auto=webp&s=56ce23b05d59f3b53403d8f0cf0da56463d8efe4

That day when the four of them went out to inspect floral tributes to Queen Elizabeth II, William was the one who kept things under control. Not Kate; Kate looked annoyed, and it was clear she was annoyed with Claw. And Claw looked upset, not because of the Queen's death, but because she was feeling Kate's coldness and didn't like it at all. But William was the only one of the four behaving as the Queen would have expected, ignoring his personal problems. William is capable of doing what needs to be done.

The thing is, and Sean has said this before, William inherited much of Prince Philip's character. Not Charles's, but Philip's. And he's like his aunt Anne: no nonsense. Which doesn't exactly make him "popular" with some officials. But we've also seen that those who do their job are very well recognized by William. And it's never been said of him that he's been disrespectful to his staff. Demanding, yes, but disrespectful, never. Much less shouting at them. Never. Claw and Harry did do it repeatedly.

In fact, Sean is right: it was Claw who was sent to learn how to deal with the media. Sunshine Sachs recommended that Claw, before the trip to Australia, take some courses to learn how to be more empathetic and how to face the press.

And it's incredible that Andersen is still pursuing this storyline, when we've seen Harry lose control in court and in front of the press. William doesn't need anger management classes; it's the Harkles who do.

But being the Harkles, they wouldn't learn anything.

THE A LIST DUMPED MARKLE FOR THIS TRICK SHE PULLS ALL THE TIME

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWgK6mqE_0s

Sean's been saying this for a long time, and SecondhandCoke and many other people who are active in Los Angeles have also mentioned it and heard things.

The Harkles are cheap merchandise.

Claw ruined every opportunity with her attitude. We've been hearing for years that Claw and Harry annoyed everyone in Montecito by being unwelcome party crashers, trying to take advantage of any celebrity. So it's not just gossip that A-listers avoid them. We've seen that attitude, the "No, thank you, I won't take pictures with Meghan Markle" kind of thing. Maybe some people still like having a picture with Harry, but with Meghan? No way.

That's why Claw is trying to rehabilitate her image. And she doesn't understand why they have to bring up her problem with her father, Thomas, because don't families have problems? Look at the BRF and their problems with Andrew.

Claw believes the problem is that people don't see things from her point of view.

https://preview.redd.it/58k2nr6sos1h1.png?width=638&format=png&auto=webp&s=f14f6f779da7686cda6ffcf637c57fffc19f46e8

Claw doesn't seem to understand that the issue isn't about points of view, but that she's simply toxic.

That's why Gwyneth Paltrow regrets this video.

https://preview.redd.it/epauh9k2ps1h1.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=44d0cf7a40d1f340fdf02c26607e1b1a96ee6298

Claw has used every trick in the book to stay in the media spotlight. Every single one. And she's exhausted them all. And she's exhausted the patience of the A-Listers.

Because Claw has stalker-like behavior. Whenever she meets someone famous, she wants to take pictures with them as if they were best friends. And that bothers a lot of people because they don't want to be taking pictures all the time. And besides, according to Sean's source, it turns out those people are also worried that Claw is recording them. Because Claw pulls out his phone faster than Billy the Kid pulls out his gun. If Claw was recording BRF, why wouldn't he do it with them?

Add to that the fact that she's been one failure after another, and the truth is, there's no interest in getting to know her. There's still interest in Harry, but Sean is clear in saying that it's fading, because people think, "Oh, he met the Queen, he knows the King," and things like that... and then they run into a bore. It's not that Harry is unpleasant to them, but Harry isn't the kind of guy you can have an interesting conversation with.

So Claw has found herself having to introduce herself a few times because no one recognizes her. She's annoyed about it; she thinks she's very popular with the A-listers... actually, she thinks she's better than them. And no, they don't know her. The most she is is "Harry's wife."

https://preview.redd.it/bk3z9qtzrs1h1.png?width=276&format=png&auto=webp&s=db6b5270c7559997c5d21f9dfd7685b12390e5df

MARKLE JUST NOT STELLA ENOUGH FOR THIS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03obFWsheVI&t=32s

Sean is right: Claw's image and her closet say a lot about her.

https://preview.redd.it/178qlbksss1h1.png?width=569&format=png&auto=webp&s=be10fd385148eafa3a7d6788e9d9906640ec3a7a

Well, Claw dressed in pink as if she were Princess Amelia Mignonette Grimaldi Thermopolis Renaldo, princess and heir to the throne of Genovia, is generating a lot of buzz, but not in a good way. It's clear that Claw is incapable of originality and that, of course, she was determined to take a solo trip like Kate's and do things better than Kate.

https://preview.redd.it/gdwonznhts1h1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=a4c00be853a5be29b1cf5804cdeab4b785a2d295

But no, that didn't happen.

https://preview.redd.it/ni08awgjts1h1.png?width=572&format=png&auto=webp&s=0de256cc75a4c5f25500145730da96dd8cc3bb03

Not at all.

https://preview.redd.it/boe9m07qts1h1.png?width=609&format=png&auto=webp&s=78973b071d4d49fc108632a3a702c581d75f2de6

The dangers of social media: just as there are AI-generated images, real images also surface 🤣🤣

The trip to Switzerland portrays her as desperate, not happy. She wanted to appear "professional," but no, she doesn't look comfortable at all.

And all of this comes in the embarrassing video from earlier this week, in which Claw wore an Oscar de la Renta dress similar to her second wedding dress, which was by Stella McCartney.

https://preview.redd.it/muivmwu9vs1h1.png?width=887&format=png&auto=webp&s=10f212b60fcf4538f485cabd4cbd931ce5cfe798

And in all the discussion about whether it was the second dress or not, the only one who isn't interested in the whole thing is Stella McCartney. She doesn't want that kind of publicity at all. No.

Except when it turns out Claw is now selling t-shirts!!!... oh, wait, not really. According to a staff member, posting that size chart that some sinner posted here (I already said I buy my t-shirts at Walmart 😁😁😁 and other sinners do too) doesn't mean Claw is going to sell clothes.

I know, it seems confusing to you too, but it's Claw. Everything is confusing with her.

The underlying issue is that Claw isn't giving up and wants to be named an ambassador for a major clothing brand. Earlier this week, she was pursuing Stella McCartney and Oscar de la Renta. Now, it's Giorgio Armani. Meanwhile, with the T-shirts, she's trying... yes, trying for a Selena Gomez-style partnership with Walmart. In fact, Sean mentions following Sarah Jessica Parker's lead with Primark.

In other words, "look, yes, I have a closet with clothes from big designers, but I also like casual clothes."

What Sean is saying is that the way she's making that movement is confusing. And everything is confusing because Claw doesn't really know what she's doing and is unable to focus on one thing.

And if her face in the closet photo wasn't terrifying enough, here's a new Claw meme!!!!

https://preview.redd.it/kvc3aydots1h1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=2ed55c79a282d22d909ed567b9551e7f9bd984c0

Sweet nightmares!!!!

https://preview.redd.it/k9ex7hcjyo1h1.png?width=634&format=png&auto=webp&s=22969b4bfcad7f1d539ed8430b30d55c36a173ac

But more important than the girl, the one whose hair is never combed, the one who always wears pajamas, is that it is clearly visible that the jacket is Giorgio Armani.

I can't even comment on TW's smile. What's wrong with her face?

https://preview.redd.it/tijlr9rn0p1h1.png?width=595&format=png&auto=webp&s=e35b22618ad8fe76922d9644a0b58b7c03938a3d

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

https://preview.redd.it/w04t7khnzk1h1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=fcbdcfa7744e0aa8f227d50dbef9ac02d1e69814

What the BRF sings to Harry and Claw

🎼There was a time I used to say: Girl, I need you
But who is sorry now?
You really hurt, you used to take and deceive me
Now, who is sorry now?

You got a way of making me feel so sorry
I found out right away
Don't you come walking begging, I ain't loving you
Don't you get in my way

('Cause there's a time when you're right)
(And you know you must fight)
Who's laughing, baby? Don't you know?
(And there's the choice that we make)
(And this choice you will take)
Who's laughing, baby?

So just leave me alone, girl (leave me alone, leave me alone)
Leave me alone
Leave me alone, girl (leave me alone, leave me alone, leave me alone)
Leave me alone (leave me alone), stop it
Just stop dogging me around🎼

WILLIAM,CAMILLA & SNUB

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z7W4z0Cak4

If there's one thing William and Camilla agree on, it's that they can't stand how terribly absurd the Harkles are, always trying to hog the spotlight during important royal events.

William was obviously very annoyed that the Harkles kept trying to hog the spotlight, both during the King's trip to the USA and during Kate's trip to Italy. Camilla was also annoyed. In fact, she also agrees with William that it's not a good idea for Charles to talk to Harry,

But Camilla is annoyed because certain media magazines (cough cough People magazine cough cough) are spreading the idea that Harry couldn't see the King because she prevented it. In other words, we're back to the wicked stepmother trope. And that's not the case. Camilla doesn't think it's a good idea for Harry to talk to King Charles III, but she won't stop him from speaking to his son if he wants to. Harry is King Charles III's son; she won't interfere in that relationship, even if Harry deserves it, even after Harry was offensive to her in Spare and also lied. Because it wasn't true that William and Harry were against Charles's marriage to Camilla, and neither of them begged him not to marry. On the contrary, William, after a period of conflict with Camilla's sons, realized he had been very wrong and supported his father's marriage because it made Charles happy. Here, the source is very reliable: Tom Parker-Bowles.

https://preview.redd.it/xpxfp9kq2l1h1.png?width=386&format=png&auto=webp&s=35c2e067e314805f66532d5670f014260123a495

The King didn't see Harry during his trip to the USA because, quite simply, the King didn't go to the USA for that purpose. Harry wasn't even an issue; there were other matters to resolve. And Camilla is annoyed because it seems Harry doesn't understand that. It wasn't the right time for Harry to go to New York and see the King in a hotel lounge or a bar. Sean says those were Harry's plans to see his father "privately."

https://preview.redd.it/vflb3xqx5l1h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=c9733d37839ae4d966098a1bbb9f7fdcddd2d5a5

Camilla and William don't understand what Harry and Claw are trying to do. Do they want privacy, or not? Like this trip to Switzerland that Claw is taking. Who is she announcing it to? It's so obvious that Claw did it out of jealousy towards Kate, it's annoying.

https://preview.redd.it/987zgea75l1h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=f75f1b16ab44eb8ac87f3e15c0b57a4bf6c8b85d

William is annoyed that Harry and Claw won't stop. Their constant attacks on Camilla are annoying, and their attacks on Kate are extremely annoying. William is annoyed by the narrative that the wicked Camilla prevented the King from seeing Harry because he's fed up with Harry's victimhood. So it seems he sent Harry a little message: "if you're so keen on being received by the King, why not bring the children to the UK and demonstrate with actions how dedicated you are to the monarch and the BRF?" William knows that's not what Claw wants, and that Harry does what Claw wants. It just seems Claw doesn't always get what she wants.

MARKLE RAMPS UP LOATHING ON PRINCESS KATE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZ37i_RYYVc

Claw will travel to Europe this weekend for a major event on children's online safety - She will participate on Sunday in Switzerland in a commemoration for people who have died from digital harm.

Did anyone know about that event? No. Does anyone care? No.

But it's curious how Claw and Harry find events to attend when the royals have important public engagements. The Harkles have people supporting them who help them get these things arranged.

Meanwhile, As Ever remains a bottomless pit of losses. And Netflix has no interest in working with Claw. So, to pretend everything is okay, Claw wants to revive the story that she's a humanitarian and philanthropist.

And because she adores children, she has to use children again. Because she's a mother... and because she hates the fact that Kate gets along so well with children.

Claw doesn't even get along with his own children

https://preview.redd.it/f855su8mhl1h1.png?width=940&format=png&auto=webp&s=3eee88267aac7a943578e96da7b430e1b916394f

Well, Claw is trying to make money, and we already saw how well she did in Australia—so well, in fact, that it seems she didn't earn the commission she was expecting.

That's why Claw is so upset because Kate has experienced again the effect she has when she uses something.

And here, Sean doesn't know anything about fashion, but he spoke with someone who works at Asprey.

https://www.asprey.com/en-intl?srsltid=AfmBOopbDzgNqnUDjAr2tde7-r_uWz2vx-q0W6n28Lhm4BYgHZOMhLCL

https://preview.redd.it/fyw6ee3ajl1h1.png?width=768&format=png&auto=webp&s=28f7d23982a56582bbd5e38bd23f1f5cdea4ae17

During her trip to Italy, Kate was seen carrying the Asprey London 167 Mini Bag, which costs £3,900. She even put it down to talk to some children.

Because of that gesture, that single gesture, the traffic to that company's website has skyrocketed.

Asprey has a long history of ties to royalty, having been a royal supplier since the reign of Queen Victoria. They have held a royal warrant ever since.

So there she is, the future queen, using a product from a royal supplier who packed suitcases for Queen Victoria, the Queen Mother, Queen Elizabeth...

And what do women see? A good quality, unpretentious, practical handbag. And Kate manages to generate interest in that bag. Whereas Claw doesn't, because it's too obvious that she goes around saying, "Look, I wear such and such brand, I wear such and such brand shoes"...

https://preview.redd.it/4ma0anndll1h1.png?width=1327&format=png&auto=webp&s=16277fd4404535664359ee07934fa07ce8b20c24

And the problem is that she's thinking about that, not how she looks in what she's wearing. Kate is busy doing the job and doing it well. Claw isn't. That's why it's more appealing to buy something Kate wears, because we see her walking on the grass in heels and, of course, we want to know what brand of shoes they are. Claw is like, "Look at my Jimmy Choo shoes!"

If this were a competition... yes, Claw is competing, but she's competing on a court where the game was played and she lost it a long time ago.

NO RETURNED CALLS- HARRY’S MELTDOWN OVER UK SECURITY BID

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIUHUo9jK9s

Harry cannot understand, even when it is explained to him in the simplest terms, that he is no longer a senior royal, he does not work for the Firm, he is a celebrity with a title of nobility.

https://preview.redd.it/dw6bwfom9l1h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=1186f4a33eac8d8049aa645a19e70d375d97aa7b

And Harry is so incapable of understanding that he persists in pestering about his security. And it turns out that Shabana Mahmood, who was inclined to provide him with that 24/7 security, is now too busy seeking to become Prime Minister or leader of Labour herself. In other words, Starmer is watching as even people he considered on his side are trying to profit from his downfall.

As the Mayor says in a very famous Chilean musical play, The Pergola of Flowers:

https://preview.redd.it/2966q25lal1h1.png?width=194&format=png&auto=webp&s=d70497334d4940b30804d15857353666bfef47d7

🎼If someone suggests something to me,
I always say yes.

If someone proposes a business deal,
I always say yes.

In all my life and experience,
I never say no.

But when I'm alone,
I do what's best for me.🎼

Incredible, it's a musical play from 1960. It's 2026 and we know perfectly well that what the Mayor says is true because that's how politicians work.

According to Sean's source in the government, Mahmood, faced with Starmer's increasingly imminent downfall, isn't exactly answering Harry's calls. Yes, Harry continues to call the Minister to find out what will happen to his security. And the reason Mahmood is distancing herself from the matter is that she doesn't want to antagonize the King.

https://preview.redd.it/rhoa2bwgcl1h1.png?width=284&format=png&auto=webp&s=017c1e6c7b11bccea92a1798bc7a211343d9a819

According to that source, the King has no interest whatsoever in colluding with any part of the government to bring Harry back to the UK. And Mahmood has observed that much of Starmer's problem stems precisely from her unwillingness to truly work with the King. She does want to, and if she succeeds, there could be no productive weekly audiences if she persists in bringing up the "Harry issue."

Mahmood has realized that maintaining a "partnership" with Harry isn't a good idea because Harry's popularity has plummeted due to his actions. Nothing Harry does has any impact. And spending money on Harry is increasingly seen as a very bad idea, especially since Harry is publicly considered a minor and irrelevant member of the royal family. Mahmood is too busy now trying to build her own safety net.

And Harry is worried about the lack of response to his messages and calls from his team to find out what's happening with his case.

https://preview.redd.it/ed59ivh4el1h1.png?width=654&format=png&auto=webp&s=4e27fd97d5892b318ab42bf738f4a77c39465e8b

I'VE WRITTEN A LETTER TO DADDY -FERGIE SECRET TRULY REVEALED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7COiKIwFVo

https://preview.redd.it/qh93fikowd1h1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=e8ad7da00cd08713a663e77b2ae05a59d6a0e1f6

No matter how hard they try. I can't believe Fergie's relationship with Diddy. I feel the same way I did when I read in Spare what Harry did with Elizabeth Arden cream while thinking about his mom.

God!!!! Get rid of that image!!!!! 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱

It just doesn't make sense to me that Diddy and Fergie would... no, I can't stand the whole thing. Sean wasn't that surprised; he's said that during those years when he ran into Fergie on TV, he heard worse things. What a jerk for keeping that gossip to himself! 😠😠😠😠

Okay, Diddy's team has denied everything. Basically, his PR department is saying that "actually, this isn't a bad person to be attached to given the horrendous and negative PR that I've already had and the ongoing court cases and battles. So that moves it away from that" I quoted Sean exactly as he said it. I didn't understand.

https://preview.redd.it/rir85876yd1h1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=a5fc9793a2ab371b99f651f3c35749cae1c91dc5

I loved Edward Mulhare 😍

Sean continues: "Hence the same reason that according to this particular wellplaced source that I know, Sarah Ferguson equally has now seen dollar signs because you know good or bad, they can put the story together and say well this is what happened, is how we met how he's going to work with him on a project or a movie or an idea"

And this is where Sarah's debt comes in. She had a debt of five million in the 1990s. Perhaps it doesn't seem impressive now, but five million is still a respectable sum, and back then it was very respectable.

https://preview.redd.it/mocjlt37zd1h1.png?width=300&format=png&auto=webp&s=4a5b874447523b0f809f0fe47501c2afd5cf0744

So, the point is that Sarah can claim she met Diddy through projects she had that he could finance... but given that we now know Sarah was asking everyone she met for money, did she or did she not receive "financial contribution" from Diddy's empire? Was Diddy helping or assisting her?

And now we return to Andrew, because Sarah was selling access to Andrew, and that was the breaking point with the BRF. Diddy had an appreciation—though I'd call it a "fascination"—for the BRF. He thought that having an association with them would give him a classy appearance, similar to what Epstein was after. So, of course, Diddy wanted a photo with the Queen. He already had one with William and Harry, whom he bumped into at a benefit concert, July 2007, when Combs performed at Wembley Stadium for the Concert for Diana and they took photos together backstage.

https://preview.redd.it/0gsgiykr0e1h1.png?width=299&format=png&auto=webp&s=e4f6b0dc027ad902cef3b3652c1c3b7b0290a8a5

Sarah might have sold Diddy the photograph with the Queen he wanted, thus getting him to give her money.

It's not just a matter of curiosity to know how the Yorks financed themselves, because they didn't live on the allowance the Queen gave Andrew.

ARCHIE & THE MISSING ELEMENT REVEALED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzCb5drg260

I don't know which book Sean is referring to; I doubt it's Christopher Andersen's because Andersen is a sugar

But Sean says that a recent book points out that the whole strange birth of Harry also raised eyebrows within Palace.

https://preview.redd.it/8gfaxvno3e1h1.png?width=810&format=png&auto=webp&s=f634e7ac79861eda96f29c4b3a594d3d1b3dc09b

First thing: that photo. It was taken, I believe, four hours after Archie was supposedly born. Sean says he was there that day when Harry announced the birth. And that photo was published by the Harkles... without the Queen's permission. The first photo of babies born at the BRF, of that type, was taken by the monarch. But the Harkles continued down the path of disrespecting the Queen.

And the second act of disrespect was directed at the Queen, but also at William and Kate.

Because they, like Charles, were preparing flowers to send to Claw when she went into labor and when the baby was born. A kind gesture, which the Queen and Charles had also extended to Kate.

Well, the flowers arrived at the clinic... and then, the clinic staff told them that they appreciated them, but that Claw and Harry had already gone home with the baby.

https://preview.redd.it/ujepk16f7e1h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=7ef858aaa310116c3046b9b47d377fea19c5ae24

The Queen was deeply hurt. Because she didn't understand the grave discourtesy Harry displayed. William was the first person he informed of his children's births, but Harry didn't show that same respect to his grandmother.

Katie Nicholl writes in her book, "The New Royals: Queen Elizabeth’s Legacy and the Future of the Crown," that "One source described Harry as being 'almost morbidly obsessed' with keeping Archie's birth as secret as possible." But what about his grandmother and father?

Sean says that Palace receives many messages and emails asking about Archie and Betty, not affectionate ones, but rather about the birth of these children. And Sean says that Palace knows as much about the matter as we do. But from what has been revealed, it's understandable why there was internal unease about Archie's unusual birth. Betty's birth is an even greater mystery.

https://preview.redd.it/pzjkndjo7e1h1.png?width=405&format=png&auto=webp&s=c653a574a82f64b7aed446b9394462f47bf8270a

WILLIAM & THE KING - WHO WILL CRACK FIRST …?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlcfhVcQsz4

King Charles III has visited Golders Green to meet the victims of last month's stabbings in the neighbourhood, in a show of support for the Jewish community, and spoke of his concerns about rising antisemitism.

https://preview.redd.it/ymsnm31g8e1h1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=1a650f97acc4d39bda838016c289dd358cd952d3

And it was a visit that wasn't exactly well-received by the government. Apparently, Starmer had been there before and was booed. Now, the King received a grand reception, which the Mayor of London wanted to attend. But he was told no.

Charles was not in the mood to be near Starmer or Khan, especially when he had to read a rather unpleasant speech to open the parliamentary session because it was an official government speech, not his own, and everyone saw that the King was not exactly in a good mood that day in parliament.

The King has other concerns. Like Buckingham Palace. What to do with that Palace? It's the official Palace, the official residence. And its restoration cost millions. So, Sean says there's pressure for the King to live there. And Charles doesn't want that; he wants to transform the Palace into a museum, so it can be self-financing through ticket sales. But that's not what the government wants, because they don't want such an enormous building practically empty.

And of course, with the tense relations with the government, the palace has become a white elephant that serves as a dart against the monarchy.

ANYTHING FOR MONEY - SUSSEX SWIFT MOVE ON THIS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ke5RFbABzuE

Claw never understood why the BRF operates like a firm, even though the Queen had once said, "The family is the star; you're just one cog in the machine." The Queen didn't see herself as the star, but as the head of that machine that has to work if everyone does their part.

The Harkles don't get it. They think that having a title is enough to be liked. But the trip to Australia exposed how unpopular they are. Meanwhile, Kate, who was there for official engagements, garnered favorable headlines worldwide.

But since money doesn't grow on trees... yes Harry, it doesn't grow on trees, accept it, the Harkles seek money even in a world that has been hostile to them: producing movies.

https://preview.redd.it/alcn7n0lhe1h1.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=062e75356f014e8d84cd9565c4ce6290bba2ee71

And Harry and Claw are developing a feature film about the Afghanistan War "No Way Out: The Searing True Story of Men Under Siege." The project was first reported by Deadline.

https://preview.redd.it/uijr9g1xje1h1.png?width=750&format=png&auto=webp&s=053e74863d6a0109c1d77e619aa4babf9cf2e732

Now, they would be "executive producers." In other words, nothing. Zero creative control, zero interference whatsoever, they just have to lend their names.

Sorry, no. Harry needs to put his name.

The reason they want Harry involved is that the producers of this film want him to appear in it in a small role. Not a cameo, but something a bit more substantial. And that way they'd have the first "prince" with a reigning king participating in a film.

Harry would definitely be willing because he could wear a uniform again.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Actually, that deal hasn't been finalized yet. But from what Sean heard, Harry could have a minor role, a couple of lines of dialogue, and he'd get paid. Not as much as he wants, he won't get 20 million dollars, but he'd get paid for it. Claw isn't part of the deal.

Harry doesn't have much of a chance to refuse, because he needs the money. And continuing to miss out on opportunities because Harry thinks everything he's offered is beneath him isn't a good idea.

When Sean edits his videos while traveling, some things can get confusing. But to be clear: no, William isn't going to Invictus, he's not even thinking about Harry, and he couldn't care less about Harry's mental health because Harry has plenty of therapists on hand to sort things out. William wants to remove Harry from the website, and there's no doubt about that.

The problem is a certain group of officials within Palace who are overly concerned with opinion polls, as Sean explained yesterday. These people, who seem to live on social media and believe that the world is as it appears on a social network, believe that the Harkles are popular among Gen Z, and that it would be a debacle for the BRF if something happens to Harry.

And those are the people William has had to deal with all these years. Which isn't easy because they don't have to agree to what he wants. It's a persistent problem.

TITLES GO - WILLIAM FUMES AFTER THIS BOMBSHELL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usPMw3LYqno

CATHERINE BITES BACK ..PRINCESS AT WAR

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kapz0Ox8VU

It's important to remember that it had already been very difficult for William to get his uncle Andrew removed from the royal web and from Royal Lodge. It involved years of arguments.

What often frustrates William is that Palace officials, who have an advisory role in these cases, only agree to take action when the situation is completely out of control or when something truly serious has happened. That's what happened with Andrew. And that's what's happening with Eugenie and Beatrice.

https://preview.redd.it/kj80j6l3u61h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=fe947213a9db1616482161329fa8fa993e3215bb

This relates to Eugenie's charity, which is under investigation.

For all intents and purposes: it's an excessive expenditure compared to what was allocated to aid.

William doesn't want this kind of scrutiny. William is being particularly meticulous about ensuring that his Royal Foundation and all associated projects are very transparent with their accounts, but he's noticing that the same isn't happening with his cousins... or his aunt. Where is the money Fergie earned? Because she has earned money. Who is funding Fergie now? Why aren't Eugenie and Beatrice going to talk to William to answer their questions? Who will finance Andrew? William doesn't want Charles to continue doing so, because we always come back to the same point: what did Andrew do with his money?

What bothers William isn't just what will come out about Andrew or Fergie, but also the possibility that Eugenie and Beatrice might be involved in some kind of scandal. He doesn't want any of that and he doesn't want BRF to be dragged into it.

https://preview.redd.it/stag9lefw61h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=b48cae0b7d47cee3092be6aee9afef4ac921e2f8

If Eugenie, above all, had possessed common sense, she would have done what she should have done: seek Kate's friendship, gain Kate's trust. But no, Eugenie didn't, nor did Beatrice. Eugenie trusted Claw more than Kate. Bad idea, because the only one who could have influenced William in her favor was Kate. And now that they wanted to establish that connection, it's too late, because Kate doesn't trust them, especially not Eugenie.

SUSSEX CARNAGE MARKUS, MARKLE HARRY & OZ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXn0845Vpqg

Money is also a hot topic in Montecito.

Harry and Claw are having money problems. And Harry needs to find a way to get back to the UK and become a senior royal again. Of course, one way is for him to sincerely regret what he said and did... but let's get back to reality. What Harry wants, and what he's wanted for months, is for everything he's done to be forgotten. The past is the past... you know.

So he's desperate for that video of his flight to freedom to be deleted. You know that Sean, in "Dr. Evil" mode, inserted that video into one of his own 🤣🤣🤣.

https://preview.redd.it/21f2i6scx61h1.png?width=215&format=png&auto=webp&s=0dabf820a6e3f1dccfb9cc726f6c8dc2bba74ff0

Sean says Harry doesn't realize the gravity of that video because Claw doesn't say anything; he's the one doing all the talking. He says they escaped, that he's flying to freedom, etc. Harry agreed to expose himself and say what was his own downfall. Because how could KC3 call Harry back if Harry was practically admitting they had to escape from Alcatraz?

https://preview.redd.it/eddb6w62y61h1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=201a5f2c1a7db9bcd168803ac61896d4f1750a3a

And of course, Claw convinced him with "you have to protect me, you're my knight"... blah blah blah.

Harry isn't very bright.

But even he's realized that Australia didn't go well at all.

Sean, while reiterating what he already said about the selfies and all that, points out that the biggest problem in Australia was the lack of something: the lack of people who massively wanted to see the Harkles.

https://preview.redd.it/mywgkcnnz61h1.png?width=799&format=png&auto=webp&s=91d3693e83957474fec88338a7f868edbbe07094

There was a group of people to one side, but it was clear that, despite the "supposed" leak of the itinerary, the Harkles were not at any risk because no one came to see them.

Quite different from what happened with Kate, who was welcomed by many people... much to Chris Shipp's dismay, who seems to have taken it very badly. 🤭🤭🤭

https://preview.redd.it/qmc43bqb171h1.png?width=168&format=png&auto=webp&s=0ab32ba2923542c984e624b4fe89ff0118128d0e

And the big problem is that it was very obvious. Because there were many police barricades in the places the Harkles went, and there were government-paid police officers... and what there weren't were people.

Sean says that Harry himself was to blame for that. Because he insisted on making it clear that it was a private visit. Well, the Australians took that literally and gave him a great deal of privacy. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Harry is furious about this, because the lack of staff is now affecting Invictus and his security complaint. Sean says that of course these situations were going to happen because there are only three people working to organize these outings.

And of course, speaking of third parties.

In the midst of all that, the one who stood out on the trip to Australia was Markus Anderson.

https://preview.redd.it/kjtj6eki271h1.png?width=262&format=png&auto=webp&s=e63604455faa9f1f8b0ac1acbb90262659ca685b

Markus, whom Sean describes as practically the only one left in Claw's life. And it's true, he's the only constant in her life. Well, Harry got along well with Markus... but now Harry blames Markus for what went wrong in Australia.

Because, from Harry's perspective, the biggest disaster was the weekend retreat.

https://preview.redd.it/qu2gekcd371h1.png?width=634&format=png&auto=webp&s=69b4eafac1749c88929b2b211db24e0c43762ed1

And Harry blames Markus because he was the one who made the connections. Harry knew it was a bad idea, but he figured all the tickets would sell out, and everything would be fine. No, it didn't go well at all.

Harry wanted to focus on charity events. But Claw was going to do what she wanted: a celebrity trip. And she arranged it herself with Markus. And now, because of this, Harry sees that he could lose Invictus and, of course, his safety. So Harry now blames Markus... even though, in reality, it's Claw's fault.

And Harry can pretend to be a speaker, or write letters against antisemitism, but Australia caused Harry great harm, and he, as always, looks for someone to blame. And according to Sean, the three of them are blaming each other big time.

MARKLE'S SECRET ROYAL RECORDINGS ..LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qI93IV-aDwM

Well, Claw did take photos and recordings.

https://preview.redd.it/b2u038un971h1.png?width=660&format=png&auto=webp&s=b75f91ac07eb4c27fe45fa8c505856a5351d6650

She spent all her time taking out her phone with a camera and recording.

And she was very angry about living in Kensington; she wanted to live in Windsor, to be near the Queen. And the Queen didn't want to be alone with Claw because she knew she was always recording

So Claw has pictures, and she wants to use them. Sean already mentioned that she wants to use those private photos from the palaces where she stayed. But Claw doesn't understand that she can't use those pictures. She took the photos in houses that weren't hers without the owners' permission.

And even if Claw had managed to obtain a recording of the Queen, Claw cannot use any recording. Claw could only use it if the Queen had expressly given her permission, that is, written permission.

Now, I think Sean underestimates Claw. If she had something like that, she'd release the recording anyway. Claw would never think there would be consequences for her because she's married to Harry, and Harry was the Queen's favorite grandson. But Sean has always said that if she had something like that, or a truly compromising photo, she would have used it by now.

And besides, even if she had pictures, who's to say they aren't photoshopped? Or AI-generated?

In any case, everything Claw does or says takes her further away from the BRF... much to William's relief.

https://preview.redd.it/n011fc27g71h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=5e6fee0956ec473a887e22f877d88e1d32fe2f2b

It's not even gossip, it's a fact that Claw must be seething with anger seeing the affection shown to Kate by people in Italy, a very sincere affection.

And part of that affection is that Kate didn't earn the nickname Children's Princess by forcing the press to say it, but she earned that nickname by genuinely being someone who appeals to children.

https://preview.redd.it/m26uvdy9lz0h1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=ced91f4b691990b1d4bc6c87093bba7206884a5c

Claw, on the other hand, believes that because she sends photos of herself so that she can be called "Disney Princess," that's going to happen. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

WILLIAM - LINE OF SUCCESSION / TITLES & THIS YOU DON'T KNOW

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNqKkmQRCMA

For now, Starmer is more concerned with his own position than with going after Andrew. So Sean says that Starmer has downplayed the Epstein affair somewhat, not because of Andrew, but because he doesn't want the Mandelson case to damage him politically.

So Starmer hasn't made much progress in the paperwork to actually strip Andrew of his titles. Andrew is still the Duke of York on paper. And there's no movement to remove Andrew from the line of succession either.

But Andrew did leave the royal website. The question is, why didn't the Harkles?

One thing I want to make clear: the thumbnail for that video is misleading. No, William isn't afraid to remove the Harkjles from the website.

https://preview.redd.it/qbmm2msauz0h1.png?width=348&format=png&auto=webp&s=c684eaa903ec873071de298c603f22cb01f3d045

Following the Theo Rycroft affair, which still seems unresolved, sources at Palace have told Sean that there are two situations they are dealing with that prevent the Harkles from being removed from the website, as William so desperately wants.

1. Harry's mental health issues. Harry is fragile, and removing him from the website would cause him to have a hysterical and uncontrolled reaction. And of course, Claw would completely play the victim. That would be terrible publicity for BRF.

https://preview.redd.it/z8hl4jasvz0h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=50d434b82484fc7aebb480c176dda2e2add14adc

2. The second reason given to Sean isn't just something he accepts as valid, but rather something that isn't entirely unfounded. Some Palace staff are concerned that William and Kate aren't connecting with Gen Z. The Harkles are.

https://preview.redd.it/0kn7dedorz0h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=ebd0f776c3c876b066a4fcf5c0cf4b1657a69a55

According to that source, some officials are worried about removing the Harkles from the royal website because they don't want to lose the interest of Gen Z, who aren't as interested in William and Kate, who are now over 40.

Yes, Sean also thinks it's strange because Claw and Harry are also over 40. But of course, guys, they're both over 40 but have the mentality of 15.

https://preview.redd.it/o13w7uy1tz0h1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=e6c504cce1c4735d53d7bdec01f3b50fd9f0a9ef

According to that source, there's a group within Palace that doesn't want to lose the Gen Z audience that connects with the Harkles. And Sean says that's not entirely wrong because, indeed, Gen Z isn't attracted to the "older" BRF, as the surveys show. And although William and Kate do a great job, they don't achieve that connection with Gen Z.

And Sean says that removing the Harkles from the website, according to that source, means losing that potential appeal they generate among Gen Z, even those currently working within Palace.

Sean isn't saying he agrees with that idea, but rather that it's what he's been told is why the Harkles are still on the website. Now, if Gen Z connects with a 41-year-old man who wants his allowance from his dad, and with a 45-year-old woman who abandoned her amputee father, then that generation has serious mental problems.

WILLIAM & HARRY “IF HE CARES SO MUCH WHY THE SILENCE? “

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTgeErIIdhY

William isn't really interested in Harry's mental health or what happens to him, because he's tired of worrying about it. Harry's old now; it's his problem to sort out his mental issues.

Except when Harry wanted to change his surname from Mountbatten-Windsor to Spencer.

William respected his grandfather Philip while he was alive. And we know that when faced with particular legal situations, he uses his surname Mountbatten-Windsor; William doesn't go around announcing himself as the "Duke of Cambridge" or the "Prince of Wales."

And William would be even less inclined to be near Harry when Claw wants to completely possess Diana and use her for her own benefit.

https://preview.redd.it/7lo98lakvz0h1.png?width=634&format=png&auto=webp&s=2b2d1a1cee95d0978f134e53d95fc3d2dcc05629

On that point, his uncle Charles Spencer agreed. No, Claw is not and will not be Lady Diana Spencer 2.0.

And on the other point that William and his uncle agree is that too much time has passed and it's time Martin Bashir paid for what he did, and that the BBC stopped protecting him.

Uncle Charles bears the burden of having initially believed Bashir's claims and the "evidence" he presented, making the mistake of introducing him to Diana. Bashir then managed to convince Diana that her paranoid fears were true, even against Uncle Charles's own suspicions. Charles Spencer tried to stop it all, but Diana was already convinced that her fantasies about being spied on and everyone conspiring against her were real. And what has never ceased to bother both Uncle Charles and William is the fact that BBC executives learned of Bashir's forged documents in late 1995 without stopping the interview or its broadcast.

Now, it's not that Uncle Charles or William don't understand that Diana wouldn't have minded the interview. They both know, because it's common knowledge, that Diana had wanted to do it for a long time, just as she did with Andrew Morton. Diana was obsessed with the idea of ​​punishing her husband, Prince Charles, because he didn't love her the way she wanted him to. What was wrong is that it was well known in the 1990s that Diana had this obsession. And what Bashir and the BBC did was use that against Prince Charles, without caring about the effects it would have on Diana.

https://preview.redd.it/84q3tpmoyz0h1.png?width=1333&format=png&auto=webp&s=9fa5786f87be97c3fe3e1c88320f4065f2b9020c

That's why William hasn't gone after Andrew Morton with the same ferocity. It's not that William likes Morton, not at all, but Diana spoke with him and it was her decision. But the Diana who spoke with Bashir was convinced that her husband was spying on her, even using microphones in lamps, and that he had gotten the nanny pregnant, and that the nanny had suffered a miscarriage, among other things.

Uncle Charles has never been satisfied, because even though the Dyson Report (2021) concluded that journalist Martin Bashir used deceptive methods to obtain his explosive 1995 interview with Princess Diana, violating BBC rules, many of the executives involved went unpunished, Bashir didn't really lose much, and there was no real retribution. And William agrees.

Now, William agrees with his uncle, but Sean says it's not so easy for William to get directly involved because the matter could be seen as William using his position to pressure a media outlet. It's a bit complicated. But and in this, he believed Harry would want to get involved.

That's not the case.

Sean says he's not sure if Uncle Charles has spoken to Harry about it. But this isn't a new issue; Uncle Charles has been harping on about it for years, so Harry knows... however, Harry has never been the one to take action. To get that Dyson committee formed, it was Uncle Charles and William who took the initiative.

Harry is now in the USA. And he has never, in all these years, never lifted a finger about it. Harry talks about Diana all the time, he has used her many times in his legal cases, but he has never actually done anything for her.

And that has always perplexed Uncle Charles, people within Palace, and even William himself.

YOU ALL MISSED THIS DESPERATE MOVE BY MARKLE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELOHffqhrhE

Claw now wants to markled iPhones 🤣🤣🤣

Yes, the wonderful images of her writhing in an armchair while drinking hot tea were recorded with an iPhone.

https://preview.redd.it/egkfin9n401h1.png?width=980&format=png&auto=webp&s=50042bacd8d0e0e342287d10ea6184eed5e3d0f5

And Harry was the one who recorded those videos.

https://preview.redd.it/0eeqpak5501h1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=96c0229725ef124554628c52f90406c988149700

Sean says it looks like that white dress is indeed the one she wore at her wedding. The second dress. No, it actually looks like the custom white Oscar de la Renta gown that she wore alongside husband Prince Harry at the 2024 ESPYs.

https://preview.redd.it/cwfnzb8h501h1.png?width=887&format=png&auto=webp&s=14b39717fa06f115d01de61389bc38894243c35c

Now, Sean is wrong about the dress because it's not the same one. But he said something that caught my attention. The first dress, which was by Stella McCartney, couldn't actually be in Claw's possession. Charles paid for it, and that dress will be in the Palace vaults just like the main wedding dress. Claw doesn't have those dresses with her because they aren't "her" dresses. Since Sean believes that dress is the second wedding dress, he points out that it's odd Claw has it because it should really belong to Charles. Well, I think that, indeed, the King has both of those dresses.

But wearing the Oscar de la Renta dress that resembles Stella McCartney's is for a reason.

Promote the story that she and Harry are going to renew their wedding vows.

We need to let the fly know so it can show up at that event too 🦟🦟🦟🦟!!!!!

https://preview.redd.it/tb9j44on701h1.png?width=590&format=png&auto=webp&s=0984ea49d1bd5769b5cef86a9069b543d0c54e20

Claw wants to sell a so-called "documentary" about her wedding, reminiscing about how much she prepared, everything she felt, and how excited she was... and of course, Harry. It seems they sent the message to Netflix. But Netflix wasn't interested. Claw apparently sold the story that they want to renew their vows and have famous people as guests. But Netflix doesn't want to buy that idea. Because, the whole "famous people" thing again? How many times will Claw try to use Daniel the hairdresser in her videos?

https://preview.redd.it/8en1iz5na01h1.png?width=320&format=png&auto=webp&s=b40a7999c480f1b60cb66dea285caca4918cadcb

OZ DUMPS SUSSEXES - IS THIS THE REAL REASON WHY?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCU85P81M8U

The Invictus Games are not having a good time

It seems that Boing is not going to renew its relationship with Invictus in 2027. Earlier this week, the Daily Mail also reported that the vice chairman of the board for Invictus Games Birmingham 2027, Melloney Poole, stepped down from his role. She reportedly cited a desire to focus on her other commitments, including chairing the Florence Nightingale Foundation. And of course, the Australian debacle. The federal government has cut funding for Invictus Australia in the budget.

And that has led to the inevitable question of what Harry is really doing. Because he was in Australia talking about Invictus. So why did the Australian Labor government cut funding?

It seems the problem is that it's not clear what Invictus actually does. And in the midst of the economic crisis we're experiencing, the fact that Invictus can't sustain itself because the general public doesn't understand what it does is complicated for a government. Because people don't see that money is being given to help the military.

https://preview.redd.it/p0t6ywixa01h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=21a0741688883710a76e771d71993631e8633e7d

This is what people see

https://preview.redd.it/922wgr7gb01h1.png?width=183&format=png&auto=webp&s=38f0817085cb81f0c45742760ac24529f936ee99

And the trip to Australia only made things worse. Because Harry gave a couple of speeches and that was it. Claw didn't even wear Invctus gear. Why give money to an organization whose headliner does things like that?

And here in Birmingham they're seeing that Harry definitely isn't attracting donors. Not big ones, not small ones. And in Birmingham, they're seeing that Harry definitely isn't attracting donors. Not big, not small. Harry hasn't even appeared in the UK to do any activities. He gives a couple of speeches on his porch, but that's it.

That's why, because Harry is truly at risk of losing Invictus, his team is now working flat out to revitalize Invictus Australia... without government funding. In other words, Harry needs to find private donors.

And if Harry hasn't been able to do it in years, what do you think will happen now?

It's always hard for us to understand that our actions have consequences. Especially in these hedonistic times when we think no one will find out. We shouldn't be so harsh, though, because mistakes happen; you can't always predict what will happen in the future. Unless, of course, you read tarot cards or your horoscope in the newspaper 🤭🤭🤭

WILLIAM''S TOUGH CALL PAYS OFF - REJECTION

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZiQZh96leQ

Eugenie and Beatrice probably believed that nothing that has now come to light would ever be known. So it can't be a good time for them to realize they were wrong.

Especially since William seems to be using the same word as Andrew Lownie to refer to them: implicated. Not "affected" or "related," but "implicated" in some of what their parents did.

And as Sean has been saying since last year, the revelations we're about to see will be worse than what we already know. Sean isn't just saying this; he's been finding things out because he knows people in the US who have told him about what's been revealed about the Epstein files.

And Lownie seems to have learned about it from the same sources because on May 21st we'll have an extended version of his book, Entitled.

https://preview.redd.it/fciw51grjs0h1.png?width=526&format=png&auto=webp&s=05ac29062eca016e4b0609812121fcc31b39dde8

William gave his cousins ​​a chance to talk, and he was very clear about that. But his cousins ​​are avoiding everything; they've even left the UK to avoid any confrontation.

So now, William isn't as open with them as he once was.

And that's obvious; William isn't exactly subtle about that. So it's no surprise that Taylor Swift, who ran into Beatrice and Eugenie at the same place during a visit to London, didn't contact them.

https://preview.redd.it/byj4xu4fls0h1.png?width=412&format=png&auto=webp&s=9be90f0418e6c9e2973cdf4f52c33cc50fda9774

Taylor has proven smart enough to cut ties with people who could damage her image, and she certainly wouldn't want to be associated with the York family drama when she was lucky enough to get a selfie with William, George, and Charlotte. Taylor certainly isn't going to choose the losing side in this.

https://preview.redd.it/0bkbnb72ms0h1.png?width=194&format=png&auto=webp&s=f97ffc0607babcb62d096c944c3c47568c6df61d

MARKLE SPARK FURY "OUTRAGEOUS" DEMANDS UK RETURN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpBAsBFXNNY

Image is everything.

Taylor knows this, and she's handled it very well.

Claw, on the other hand, believes it all boils down to smiling at any camera that crosses her path.

https://preview.redd.it/94n1sxa1ns0h1.png?width=768&format=png&auto=webp&s=caf3524f387a2ee9c6dfeaec1f42485c0d75b9bc

This image is so creepy!!!! Claw is more concerned about the camera than what's happening to her son.

We know that Claw is always looking for the camera, always. She's always looking for a camera. It's a pathological obsession she has with it.

https://preview.redd.it/7pexzkfuns0h1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=b0a0443cf8e30d1d86d9bfc0559bd11d4a010fba

As long as there's a microphone or camera, there's no problem. The problem is when she's pushed out of the way, because she always has to be the center of attention in the photos.

https://preview.redd.it/p9hmquyfos0h1.png?width=306&format=png&auto=webp&s=c1a197b2700d8f9e7a4b8425a39c7eb6eb9e7641

But when it comes to making demands, Claw always makes Harry do it. Like with her list of requirements for traveling to the UK.

Now, it's not just Sean saying it, but he, everyone here, and those who comment in the Express and the Daily Mail and everywhere else know that Claw doesn't want to return to the UK. Not under the current conditions, where she'll always be second-class to Kate. If Harry were to suddenly become heir to the throne, Claw would fly on her broomstick to London first.

https://preview.redd.it/ca92vhc5ps0h1.png?width=660&format=png&auto=webp&s=7760b28200c82ae62dd3ae9d4db0a84c3952d6c4

Even the Invictus committee in Birmingham knows that.

Well, Sean says that from that source, from those quarters, they told him that they know Claw doesn't want to return, so yes, she gave a list of demands, including the one that the Express published a couple of days ago: "The last thing he wants is Meghan walking into a situation where she feels judged, and he says all he's asking is that she's treated with basic respect and not cast as the bad guy before anything's even happened."

Sean says Harry will have to return in July. But Sean doesn't think Claw will return in July.

Sean mentions William and Kate. No, they won't be on Invictus. This relates to what Sean has been saying all these months: the Invictus committee wants the Wales family at the event. The Birmingham committee wants "real royals" there.

And that's part of Harry's problem: he needs to bring someone from his family to the games because he needs the attention that real royals bring to those events. Claw knows this, so Sean says that Claw has no problem sharing the stage with the King (of course she wouldn't have a problem with that either), but she doesn't want to do it with the Waleses.

That's why Claw made that demand to the Invictus committee.

Deep down, what Claw wants is for the Invictus committee to stop insisting that anyone from the BRF be at the Games, other than the King. Claw only benefits from the King's presence because he's useful for what the Harkles need. An updated photo of the King with Harry would be world news, and Claw would certainly use it to his own personal advantage. But she doesn't want Anne, or the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh... she doesn't even want the Duke of Kent anywhere near her. She doesn't want any royals, least of all William and Kate.

All this show it's related to the fact that Claw doesn't want to be sidelined. Because she doesn't want a repeat of what happened at the Queen's funeral, when they sent her to the North Pole without a coat.

https://preview.redd.it/12tplkm2rs0h1.png?width=646&format=png&auto=webp&s=3b5c39605440aedd3959c5ff0727c275f4833413

So, when Sean mentions William and Kate, what he's saying is that Claw doesn't want to face them under any circumstances because she's going to lose completely. Claw is terrified of ever seeing the Waleses again, and of having to face Kate's gaze once more. That "come one millimeter closer and I'll crush you right here" look she gave her the day they went flower looking.

https://preview.redd.it/aq7wotddrs0h1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=8f78d043b0195e2bdeaa658963924da2630bf705

That's why Claw will avoid being in the UK at all costs. So what if W&K aren't at Invictus? That doesn't matter to Claw, because they'll be in the UK, and she doesn't want to run into them anywhere.

And of course, that means the Sussex children won't be traveling.

Claw will find a way out of it.

So that story about the Express that was already discussed in this sub was partially true. Harry, on behalf of Claw, made that demand. Now there's context for why he did it.

MARKLE TUNES IN WATCHES THE SHOW

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhuSlExtupA

Claw watches Neil Sean's videos. And Sean discovered this a long time ago, not only from former staff but also because on more than one occasion Sean has received messages from "representatives" of the Harkles telling him not to say certain things, as happened with the Australia issue and whether the Australians were going to pay for security.

In fact, many people in the comments mocked Claw when he named his brand "As Ever," because they said he had taken it from Sean who always says "As ever."

Now, Claw watches the show but doesn't get the advice. Because Sean knows a thing or two about advertising, and he's been telling Claw for a while that she's doing it wrong.

Sean always says he finds it strange that Claw has around 3 million followers and that this isn't reflected in sales. If you see this, you might think Sean believes it really is 3 million followers. No, he knows it's not. But it doesn't change the fact that people follow Claw. And what Sean is pointing out is that Claw isn't taking advantage of that.

Well, it seems Claw now intends to do... interactions. Not that she'll open the comments; she wouldn't tolerate reading them. But what she'll do soon is talk to the camera so we can "get to know her better."

In other words, there will be more videos like the one she released when she announced As Ever and her partnership with Netflix.

https://preview.redd.it/q4da3v5jzs0h1.png?width=168&format=png&auto=webp&s=0e3f4dc36730ff14a70620490dfa537b9e1c50b2

She calls that "interaction".

Now, Sean says that of course, Claw will do everything her way. So starting with a supposed "new image" by opening a closet full of jams or the bookmark thing isn't the right approach.

https://preview.redd.it/tn14eyovys0h1.png?width=1012&format=png&auto=webp&s=900eaef80718abf3ba9dda39f4d85499e0f49d2e

I mean, who keeps apples in a closet?

So Claw has now taken an idea that Sean gave her, but of course, she can never do things right. 🤭🤭

And because he didn't realize that, Claw now has a big problem.

SUSSEX SECURITY- BRITISH HQ REQUEST MORE DETAILS - NOT GOOD NEWS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIC3XI6Yb2A

Claw is always trying to deflect negative headlines, without understanding why she's getting them.

So she throws out rumors that she'll probably renew her vows with Harry, or that she follows astrology... irrelevant things, which, yes, make good headlines for the tabloids. That's what Claw is after: tabloid headlines.

But it turns out that when she does that, she doesn't realize how wrong she can be.

Because guess who's asking about Claw's trip to Chicago and trip to Paris?

https://preview.redd.it/8fd6rg7gdl0h1.png?width=203&format=png&auto=webp&s=748d87713d1d23c7a3a69e7478ed6783976bb1cc

https://preview.redd.it/0zsk2um3el0h1.png?width=2560&format=png&auto=webp&s=ef928f0725616c8a5a2cc648a846c97a406f2ac7

The last person the Harkles would want to ask about it

https://preview.redd.it/l5dmr9sbel0h1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=3c6f2eb96e66ddcfab3f8c9529a5ce1777e1d09b

Shabana Mahmood, Minister of the Interior since September 2025

And the person to whom Harry wrote, in his own handwriting, a letter demanding that his security case be reviewed, a letter that she displays in her office, so everyone knows that she has it.

But the tremendous conflict Labour has entered into, along with the fact that neither the police nor Ministry officials want to provide security for the Harkles (and this isn't gossip; several royal reporters have confirmed it), has forced the Minister to do something she didn't want to do: justify why Harry deserves 24/7 taxpayer-funded security. The Minister is now faced with the problem of having to explain what Paul Saunders, the digital communications manager for the Invictus Games, said: that the organization did not pay for Prince Harry's trip to Ukraine. Instead, it was funded and organized by the Foreign Office and the Ministry of Defence (WTF) under Labour's Foreign Secretary, Yvette Cooper, and John Healey, UK Secretary of State for Defence, and paid for by UK taxpayers.

So the Minister has found herself obliged to investigate the matter, because Claw has deemed it inappropriate to make it public. So, what's the difference between this and traveling to the UK?

Giving Harry 24/7 security under the current circumstances would be detrimental to the monarchy because people will perceive it as the King's doing, which isn't the case. But it would be disastrous for Labour.

Sean, in another video about the UK's political situation after the elections, points out that Starmer is really worried because a new batch of documents about Epstein is coming. In other words, more revelations about what Mandelson did. And yes, of course, more about Andrew. But what hurts Starmer the most is Mandelson.

TENSION IN MARRIAGE - REAL REASON IS THIS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aNrm_3MgBQ

Claw loves seeing herself on magazine covers. She loves it when she's dating someone from the Montecito staff; she loves commenting when she sees herself on magazine covers.

https://preview.redd.it/f7exn1okil0h1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=ab78ee6b2996434b01824c946c6252f961002226

She doesn't mind being on magazine covers for something negative; what she doesn't realize is that she's never on them for things she's actually done well.

But she loves that because deep down she's seeking validation from others. It's part of her insecurity.

So she doesn't feel so good when what she sees as a headline is "another Meghan flop." Like what happened with Australia, which has been "another Meghan flop." Claw doesn't understand it; what she sees is that social media and traditional media outlets are actually sabotaging her, preventing her from succeeding.

She believes that we are all influenced by negative reviews from YouTubers like Sean or from the Daily Express. She believes that if the press reported accurately what she says about her products, people would buy more As Ever products.

https://preview.redd.it/avj4jhocml0h1.png?width=1039&format=png&auto=webp&s=e37b02ef098d818ea9d05ea6b0c6460c47a3b576

Claw has been pressuring Harry to appear with her in Instagram videos. Her advisors told her, "You should be on TikTok," but she chose Instagram because she knows more about social media than anyone. She wanted them to be exactly like William and Kate's Kensington Royal account. Harry doesn't want to; he doesn't like social media. Claw loves it because she's constantly showing herself off.

To lure Harry into that world, she initially asks him, "Honey, look at this. Do you like it? Can I put this on my Instagram, honey?"

But since Harry doesn't want to appear in those videos, Claw complains that he's preventing her from celebrating "the joy of being a mother" by showing her children more.

https://preview.redd.it/snzomoqjol0h1.png?width=208&format=png&auto=webp&s=ed0f59e6aab04ed7437c6c97b83e3ae3f670a2e7

Claw is complaining to Harry that his refusal to support her business and his prevention of children appearing in videos is hindering her great company, As Ever.

https://preview.redd.it/jhgnq9ozol0h1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=8f3e999f5656d2362c286ae1871e6bab0f6b4cca

Claw wants to exploit her children because she believes that's what William and Kate do when they publish photos of their children.

And since Harry doesn't want that, he doesn't want to expose his children, she does it anyway, and she no longer asks him about what she posts on Instagram: she simply uploads it and Harry finds out the same way he finds out about everything: through Neil Sean's channel 🤭🤭 Actually, yes, in part, but Harry finds out when everything is already published, not because she asks for his advice.

Sean says the tension in the marriage isn't because of another woman or anything like that. It's that Harry can't control his wife, nor can he control her addiction to social media.

MARKLE PRINCE GEORGE & THIS YOU DON’T KNOW

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Npgo-LXYwsI

Much of Harry's problem with Claw stems from the fact that she puts herself first, ignoring much of what he's going through.

And Claw's constant comparisons to William and Kate make it impossible for Harry to ignore the good relationship William has with his children, especially George.

https://preview.redd.it/zk2iqz4qql0h1.png?width=862&format=png&auto=webp&s=6767891b991bb1e4ca6cd43fc8fbcaec3c6bdb18

Harry wants to show that he has this kind of relationship with Archie and Lil' D; he wants to take Archie to rugby matches and have them seen together, but Claw doesn't want that. She's refused those images. She wants people to see her as the great mother.

The problem is that Harry doesn't grasp that what he's really trying to do isn't to show a good relationship, but to imitate one.

Just like he wanted to do with Sir David Attenborough. Because Harry wanted his greeting to be shown on that BBC special. But it turns out the initial idea was for Archie to either greet Sir David or ask him a question.

Exactly, just like George and his siblings did in 2020. The difference is that they actually know who Sir David is and they love his shows (like my siblings and I loved Jacques Cousteau and kids in the 2000s loved Cesar Millan or Steve Irwin).

https://preview.redd.it/4uv9ugb7sl0h1.png?width=447&format=png&auto=webp&s=3dc3d134db3994f78fd8f6b6f0462e3a7773d161

Archie is supposed to be interested in nature... we don't know if that's true, we'll never know because we have no idea about that boy. Not even Harry does. But the fact is that Harry's idea, which perhaps would have been accepted by the BBC for that program because it would have been Archie's introduction to the world, didn't happen because Claw didn't want it. And because Harry was confronted with his own hypocrisy. He doesn't want to show his children, but he would have put Archie on display in that program just to get some attention.

https://preview.redd.it/eyrwlyiitl0h1.png?width=512&format=png&auto=webp&s=152ddeccff15b9ebdcf0e79c3e3298f26bf316ec

WE ARE DONE -WILLIAM REJECTS HARRY’S OFFER

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcy9Gfkl1WE

Under these circumstances, even if William wanted to talk to his children about Harry (which he doesn't want to do), how could he? Even we get headaches from the things Harry says and does. Those children would be even less able to understand that they have an uncle who has insulted their parents but wants them to have a relationship with cousins ​​they've never met because their uncle doesn't want them to see them...

https://preview.redd.it/udqizz7cul0h1.png?width=220&format=png&auto=webp&s=d0179c07978cee950a88162c39247d215f16b817

You know what? Screw it! I'm going to tell the story Sean's telling and then I'll get back to the Harkles gossip.

Because the Beatles gave their last concert on the roof of 3 Savile Row in 1969. Well, it wasn't a licensed concert, so the police showed up.

https://preview.redd.it/pk9dtmyxul0h1.png?width=768&format=png&auto=webp&s=571af9cdd34f654000712d5aced2d513ed454531

One of those police officers was someone that many people would recognize: Ken Wharfe, that same Ken Wharfe, who was Diana's bodyguard.

https://preview.redd.it/1nr50ju8vl0h1.png?width=764&format=png&auto=webp&s=44ef01d03965c9c6904981c1cd850d006a0f7f4d

He told Sean, when Sean interviewed him, that the police officers who went to that building didn't want to do it, but they had orders to end the concert because there were neighbors in the area complaining about the "noise" and that because of it they couldn't have lunch.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I live across from the National Stadium of Chile and I've fallen asleep to the sound of Run to the Hills by Iron Maiden 🤘🤘🤘🤘

Sean tells this anecdote because that's how some relationships are: tenuous. But Harry's relationship with William's children is even more tenuous than that story with the Beatles.

William has absolutely no tolerance for Harry. He's neither interested nor concerned. Harry feels isolated? That's his problem. The Sussex children are isolated? That's his problem. In his blunt and unvarnished way, William confronts Harry, telling him that this is what he's brought upon himself.

Harry doesn't see it that way. He sees his children as isolated from everything William's children have. And he doesn't consider it fair because, as Sean has said several times, Harry has sent them gifts. Harry sees himself as a caring and concerned uncle who is being unfairly mistreated. Of course, Harry doesn't consider fabricating the story that the King has had chats with the Sussex children to be a problem.

https://preview.redd.it/oiwhxsxdxl0h1.png?width=700&format=png&auto=webp&s=3f9656ebbb4b14b7dc686877b1cccfaed4ff21e1

Harry is upset because he sent presents to Charlotte and Louis, but William didn't send anything to Archie. The cards and gifts arrived at Palace... but it seems they were returned to the sender. Harry thinks he is trying to be a good uncle, but William is too stubborn to understand.

People are asking why the BRF isn't reacting to what Harry is doing. Well, William is reacting: he's refusing to see Harry. And according to what Sean has heard, this is hitting Harry really hard, because he's seeing that they've reached the point where no matter what Harry does, William isn't interested in having any contact with Harry or for his children to have any contact with Harry's children.

According to what Sean has heard, especially after the incident with the civil servant who wants to fix things between William and Harry, William doesn't want this relationship fixed. He's done. He's through. After what Harry and Claw said about Kate, whom he absolutely adores, 100%, and having a loving and close-knit family, which is what he always wanted in life, William is really happy with his life. There's no room for Harry.

In fact, Sean is right: Harry is the one now begging to come back. He's holding up a "remember me" sign. And Sean says: yes, Charles and William remember him, hence the reason the door remains firmly closed.

Okay, gossip is out!

https://preview.redd.it/0tg5ebplzl0h1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=5d6949c4f5614e8668d55c0393819519b02b654e

POST SCRIPTUM!!!

Since Harry didn't get what he wanted, he still tried to get his way.

https://preview.redd.it/gsjj9oy04m0h1.png?width=557&format=png&auto=webp&s=5881b9039754218507b107de2ba9ae8ec73e3113

https://time.com/article/2026/05/07/david-attenborough-100-birthday-prince-harry/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=editorial&utm_content=070526

The phrases I use in the titles are meant to give you an idea of ​​the central theme of Neil Sean's daily videos. I know several are attributed to him rather than actually said by him, but I try to find the one that accurately reflects the main story. And this one does.

PALACE & WILLIAM KICK BACK OVER FAKE SUSSEX CLAIM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkQW0xh2xWQ

The main story revolves around this article by Charlotte Griffiths about Theo Rycroft's supposed opinions.

I'm going to quote the article, but you already know it was posted by another sinner and has been widely commented on. This is so we don't get lost in Neil Sean's explanation.

Will King's new Mr Nice Guy be the man to heal the rift between Wills and Harry?

One of the King's newest and most trusted aides has vowed to repair the rift between Princes William and Harry to spare the monarch from further 'great pain'.

Former diplomat Theo Rycroft, who became deputy private secretary to the King in February, is understood to have made it his 'number one mission' and career ambition to reunite the pair, who have not spoken since Queen Elizabeth's funeral in 2022.

Sources say Mr Rycroft, married to Flora Astor, half-sister of Samantha Cameron, believes the situation has become 'f****** ridiculous' and is keen to resolve it 'urgently' for the King's sake.

One source said: 'He thinks it's time to knock their heads together. The mood is, "He's not wrong".

'Theo's a very reasonable guy and incredibly nice, and he completely gets that this is a source of great pain to the King and wants to help him resolve it. 

'He sees his job as helping the King resolve it.'

Sean starts by saying... well, actually, he starts by talking about pills and vitamins, because of his problem with pollen 😅😅. But then he says two things:

1. that the Andrew issue hasn't been dropped. In fact, Sean says that the headline circulating about movement within the government to remove Andrew from the line of succession is indeed true, and it could happen, but not for another year. Sean says that's more of a distraction than anything else (I agree) and that for the BRF, that's not an issue because that's not precisely the big problem they have with Andrew.

https://preview.redd.it/n6gccb7dce0h1.png?width=700&format=png&auto=webp&s=b69cc941515574ae80510f6ea6499467f8cef1fc

2. that people like Rycroft don't exactly live in reality. Sean doesn't underestimate Rycroft; in fact, he confirms that he is very well connected but that he didn't come from the "school of life."

Sean contacted Palace about that article. Because frankly, that article is completely absurd, especially since Rycroft seems to see the Harkles issue as a huge priority, when it isn't.

After contacting Palace, Sean says they are not at all happy with that article because mainly they don't know where those quotes come from and whether they are real or not. Up to this point on Sunday (may 10), Palace had not verified the matter with whom she wrote the story, Charlotte Griffiths.

According to what Sean has heard, and from very reliable sources—so yes, consider this a fact—Charles might eventually, perhaps, put an end to all this. He knows it would be very conflictive if it ever happened. But this is all a matter of "wish," not "will happen." Because Charles and William are perfectly clear that Harry cannot be trusted.

Charles is offended by what Harry said in many places, both in Spare and in interviews.

https://preview.redd.it/6uly764gce0h1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=1ba15cf77bc2f83cc5e3e82ffad7846871c460b1

And William has simply buried Harry. William hasn't hidden that at all. You can't even mention Harry in his presence because William doesn't care what Harry does, says, thinks, or wants. Charles is perfectly aware of this, so he knows that any contact, which is currently nonexistent, would only be between him and Harry.

So Palace wants to know exactly what happened because Rycroft, so far, has said he has no idea where that came from and that he hasn't spoken to Griffiths, so he doesn't know where the quotes originated.

This story shouldn't be underestimated; in fact, the Mail featured it prominently on its front page for part of the day, but then they swept it under the rug because Palace is demanding to know the full story.

https://preview.redd.it/uitc32w8de0h1.png?width=201&format=png&auto=webp&s=314accd80d00d076ce2bea491718d7cc0c372b37

PRINCESSES PILE PRESSURE ON WILLIAM VIA THIS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlxzGgho9Bk

The British Royal Family (BRF) isn't concerned about whether Andrew is in the line of succession or not. And I know, many here are, but Andrew was second in line, now he's eighth.

The problem with Andrew isn't that. It's how the Yorks handle things.

https://preview.redd.it/8y2m8ureee0h1.png?width=320&format=png&auto=webp&s=a3ddb23aca5dde882c8599d36ef819051e0296fd

Charles welcomed Eugenie's pregnancy. He loves his nieces. William doesn't dislike them, but he's angry with them because he's given them too many opportunities to reveal everything they know. So William isn't happy that things keep coming out about Fergie and that Eugenie and Beatrice seem to know nothing.

William does not want to get involved in any way with any of the Yorks.

And there's tension because of that, because Eugenie and Beatrice want to show that they have nothing to be ashamed of, but William can no longer believe them because every news story that comes out about his parents is worse than the last.

And they can't claim ignorance because they weren't children when their parents had ties to Weinstein and Epstein. They may not know everything, but they're certainly not ignorant.

https://preview.redd.it/j95ywr50ge0h1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=502de70b230b0eadbe94e1a834190ffe1f6ec4e8

William is keeping his distance, but that could also hurt him because he's being seen as hard and heartless. A complicated situation.

MARKLE CATHERINE & SECRET FILMING

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHJxb30ngYw

Claw is supported by four powerful women. Oprah Winfrey, Mellody Hobson, Shonda Rhimes and Nicole Avant, who is married to the co-CEO of Netflix Ted Sarandos.

https://preview.redd.it/aoqgq2ozge0h1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=d8204fe7626e34fb4ebbc549819cb630b013a8cf

Sean says Hollywood is a viper's nest. He says that at one point in his life, when he was invited to a lot of parties, he almost fell into that trap, but a friend warned him, and it was good advice because there are no friends in that world. If you fall, they abandon you. It's a cutthroat game where if someone eats or drinks something at a celebrity's house, that celebrity will make them pay one way or another.

The absurdity of this story is that isn't Claw supposed to be a powerful woman? Isn't she the one who invests in other women? Why does she need someone to protect her?

The article by Dominique Hines was in response to the Harkles being clearly seen as the worst in Hollywood. And of course, we have in mind that Australia was a disaster, and the list of disasters is long.

So it's really funny to read things like this in that article.

The goal was for Meghan to rub shoulders with key power-players, including Bezos himself.

After the event, however, the couple famously requested the removal of photos posted online by Kim Kardashian and Jenner. Publicly, sources cited sensitivity around Remembrance Day in the UK, but I’m told it wasn’t just that: the truth is, the Sussexes still want to be seen as above the celebrity frenzy.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

The same calculation applied to the wedding of Bezos and Lauren Sánchez, which took place in Venice last June. The couple were invited but chose not to attend, not because of any feud, but because they knew it would be a media storm and they would be called opportunists.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

But it is also a far from veiled threat.

Together, they offer something far more valuable than that gaudy Monday night invitation to the Met. They provide insulation, access and, when needed, intervention, too.

And all of them, it turns out, are quietly aligned around the same prize, a project insiders say could be the biggest global entertainment coup of them all, not to mention a royal PR catastrophe: Meghan’s autobiography.

And then there is the project that sits behind much of this alignment: Meghan’s autobiography. For years, it has hovered as rumour, occasionally acknowledged, never confirmed in full detail. She has, according to those familiar with the process, been taking notes for years, not casually, but methodically.

A publishing insider tells me: ‘Voice notes on her phone at 1am. Written journals. Structured reflections. She has been documenting everything since before Megxit.’

The value of that material is obvious. A memoir from Meghan would not just be a book. It would be a multi-platform event, with global publishing rights, an interview special, and a streaming component.

It is expected to be bigger than Harry’s Spare, which sold more than 1.4million copies on its first day of release in January 2023. Publishing experts tell me Meghan’s book could easily surpass those numbers

Documenting everything... Excuse me, but I can write (in fact, I used to) things in my diary. But that's not documentation. Documentation means that if I say Juanito Perez hit my car, I have photos, videos, etc., in addition to my account.

Let's get back to the Neil Sean gossip, related to this

Claw recorded photos and conversations from when she was Harry's girlfriend. And there's an incident related to that that happened at Wimbledon.

https://preview.redd.it/03k6hkdtke0h1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=7e2574ca5b609f4954c6f57eb0746048f90a9b60

It turns out that once they left the court, Claw pulled out a tape recorder to talk about her Wimbledon experience. And Kate told her, "No, we don't do this, we're not celebrities." Pippa even warned her.

So Sean says that the BRF were very aware of what Claw was doing, so Sean says there are no pictures of William and Kate on Claw's phone, unless she took them without permission.

It's understandable, isn't it? Claw doesn't seem to grasp the problem she might have.

Okay, the article points out that all of Claw's "friends" are focused on that autobiography, which they supposedly see as being much more spectacular than Harry's.

https://preview.redd.it/zndip1rume0h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=46af72f739739ee030b29861c909aeb4766ed059

But Sean is right: Claw is going to ruin everything. She already ruined it with the Oprah interview because Oprah was the one who benefited, not Claw. She made money, but since she was more excited about being interviewed by Oprah, she made a bad deal.

https://preview.redd.it/rag0z642ne0h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=a73ece5bbd81fc700be820282001935cef33578a

And Sean says the idea that Claw had material for a documentary makes no sense because no one from the BRF would approach him without first verifying that Claw didn't have a cell phone. Sean has been saying this for at least two years: no one from the BRF wanted to be near Claw or Harry because they already knew they were recording things.

So all Claw has are photos of places other people haven't been.

But of course, there's the risk that Claw might have recorded things without consent. Now, regarding that, Sean says that Palace officials didn't give him the opportunity to record anything with the Queen.

And then there's the completely obvious fact: who's going to believe Claw's lies? Claw has been sending drafts to publishers for years without any success. And to make matters worse, Penguin actually rejected Claw and his memoirs because they were, as Sean said, "boring," and of course, fantastical. But the main point is that the draft was simply "boring."

Claw has told too many lies very publicly. And so has Harry. That's why Tom Bower's book sells more; Revenge and Betrayal are bestsellers and continue to sell. Because, as Sean says, someone did their homework. And it wasn't the Harkles.

Or of course, it's probably an ascetic version of Claw's life... and who wants to read that?

https://preview.redd.it/mexvoptine0h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=e8b78f8e66c9b4afb327bba4f3acbe454da73236

https://preview.redd.it/ins6f50d8b0h1.png?width=621&format=png&auto=webp&s=0430cec470aa078493752c4c5231771b720e329a

Prince Harry has allegedly left members of the Royal Family “outraged” after sending in a list of “demands” on behalf of his wife, Meghan Markle, ahead of his major trip back to the UK this summer, it has been claimed. The Duke of Sussex is expected to return to his home country in July to attend a one-year countdown event for the Invictus Games Birmingham 2027 and the WellChild awards. It has not been confirmed whether his wife will join him.

Now, ahead of the Sussexes’ trip to the UK, reports claimed the couple have already “started to ruffle feathers” within the Palace, largely due to the Duke’s “string of demands”.

A source told Heatworld: “Harry is coming in with all these demands on behalf of Meghan, and it’s rubbing a lot of people up the wrong way.

“Harry says he has no choice, based on how badly things have gone in the past. The last thing he wants is Meghan walking into a situation where she feels judged, and he says all he’s asking is that she’s treated with basic respect and not cast as the bad guy before anything’s even happened.**”

I can't, I can't with these two

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

The source added that the Duke is caught in a “tricky” predicament, as he wants to keep his father on his side while also protecting his wife. But they said Harry’s move has not gone down well with the royals.

They alleged: “A large number of senior royals are outraged that Harry’s had the audacity to make all these demands ahead of his trip.

“The fact that, once again, it all centres around Meghan – and presumably ensuring she’s treated with kid gloves.”

https://archive.ph/8xi1Z

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/2202237/prince-harry-meghan-markle-demands

Yes, TW really needs to be treated with a glove... Thanos' glove.

https://preview.redd.it/6whvehf29b0h1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=7f1ec85fe074d37ef33eebf4ab25db22523b94fd

FERGIE & DIDDY - THIS IS FAR DARKER THAN YOU KNEW

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7JL9z_-fWE

That Andrew's situation could get worse was something we knew was possible.

But this... Nobody expected Fergie to have a relationship with Puff Daddy. And amid my complete disbelief, Sean goes and adds an even bigger bet: that relationship started when Daddy was with JLo

https://preview.redd.it/3lotcwbg270h1.png?width=1600&format=png&auto=webp&s=e3504103fae4b0b9fe7fca616c923f365a703530

Sean says he interviewed Daddy Yankee back in the 2000s, and that he showed up wearing chains around his neck, jewelry... yeah, a black Liberace 😂😂

I love that South Park episode, Vote or Die!!!!

Okay, I'm not sure where this came from. Because honestly, the headlines have been a shock to me, because seriously, Fergie, seriously?

Their friendship supposedly began when he gave her advice and helped her break into the film industry. They then maintained an on-again, off-again relationship for many years. "We'll call it platonic friendship at this point," Sean says. 😏😏

But the funny thing is, this story is taking a darker turn because now Diddy's people are flatly denying it.

Sean says it might sound weird that Diddy is denying this, because... come on!! The guy's in jail for worse. But it turns out Sean says it's not that strange, because it doesn't suit his image. And in a way, I understand, but seriously, it's a crazy situation.

I remind those who don't know that he is in prison on these charges.

https://preview.redd.it/orze7018470h1.png?width=686&format=png&auto=webp&s=50ee2dc8fc92675467ce59e5a8736015c5cfd17a

So imagine how Fergie's supporters feel. Sean mentioned a few months ago that her team—because she maintains a public relations team—was looking for ways to rehabilitate her.

But how do you rehabilitate the image of a woman who is not only linked to Epstein but also to Diddy?

https://preview.redd.it/kqlexhgw470h1.png?width=220&format=png&auto=webp&s=ce62111e032ea97f6ca3ba50c1ec4075107eba43

However, Fergie's team hasn't come forward to refute this story because none of them know the real story. Fergie herself knows, but they can't get in touch with her.

And here Sean avoids going into detail because he ran into Fergie many times when she was in the US, and he heard many rumors that Fergie moved in "some might say darker circles in that particular era." He says that legally he can't say more FOR NOW, but that he knows some facts.

https://preview.redd.it/z4cqp98x670h1.png?width=612&format=png&auto=webp&s=1ef58743c626f193462c6b7b758ff06f150eb03a

The whole point is that Fergie always went where she thought the money was. She didn't care where that money came from. And now, even now, this, with Diddy, this gossip, could help Fergie land a lucrative interview. Because, as Sean says, that's how Fergie reacts. Sean says that "Many of my sources say it's a very similar situation to the way that she reacts with people."

And Sean says that because let's not forget that Fergie wanted to marry Epstein, because she was always trying to cozy up to the wealthy. That's why Sean says, "That's the sort of thing. That's the relationship that I was told this and many others were."

And that's why, even though Diddy's team denies it, the point is that this "is certainly not the darker story that is truly out there."

Sean says that whoever found this already knows about the other Fergie thing and will publish it sooner rather than later.

https://preview.redd.it/76xdbb1d970h1.png?width=225&format=png&auto=webp&s=91432d058969ad08b0143e7e90458fedc200ab4e

WILLIAM STICKS BOOT IN WITH HARRY OVER THIS CELEBRATION NOT REQUIRED !!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxataL6Dlrc

https://preview.redd.it/0q8ce5ay970h1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=a02d418f9d7e08b84a44de8e5f18bb47be6df06a

Yes, Harry is consumed by jealousy towards his brother.

Rather, he simply can't bear what's happening.

Because the BRF did nothing, not a single mention, of Archie's birthday. None. But William was cheered at the special event to mark David Attenborough's 100th birthday taking place at the Royal Albert Hall in London.

https://preview.redd.it/z4gnbf7aa70h1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=2db96058b9f31562655aaabd5ea04b7892cf5acc

Sean says that one of the talks he had with Sir David was about his time as programme controller for BBC2, and that he wanted kids to watch cartoons like Top Cat.

https://preview.redd.it/ct8l0v82b70h1.png?width=250&format=png&auto=webp&s=b678646dbeb9d0b366d94b0b6824bb8f0fa055d0

I don't think Americans understand this, but we south of the Rio Grande loved that cartoon because it had a dubbing we adored. You have no idea how much we loved Benny the Ball because the voice we heard was that of the great Jorge Arvizu.

Harry wanted to take control of that birthday by posting a message. Nobody asked him to, although it wasn't a bad message. It's just that Harry and his team intended for it to appear at that tribute at the Royal Albert Hall.

Sean says he's not joking.

And Harry thought that was going to happen, that his message would be played at that event, because it was organized by the BBC. But Sean says he knows who was behind it, and that those people would never use that message, especially since William was going to be there and was very involved in the whole thing—who would be there, who would speak, etc. Especially since there was also a personal message from the King.

Harry is annoyed by this. But Harry doesn't seem to understand that at this point, nobody cares if he's angry. But if William gets angry, there will be consequences.

Harry thinks he's influential. Harry finds it hard to accept that he's irrelevant. Even though a couple of judges have told him so to his face.

https://preview.redd.it/rs9kf16wd70h1.png?width=220&format=png&auto=webp&s=5dd518b20767e2f6aeeff6ecc93cf19a99760526

KING FINALLY SHOWS MARKLE THE DOOR & SHE IS FUMING

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wB2Z5NkqZA

At Clarence House, in one of the rooms where the King and Queen receive the public, there's a table with family photos. Photographers captured one of them from Claw's wedding, when Charles walked her down the aisle.

https://preview.redd.it/ndxoy38ge70h1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=1040b602ced3739899d1d995cb9218be5a3821cb

https://preview.redd.it/osf298vse70h1.png?width=590&format=png&auto=webp&s=11de9296f81d5de0d5e914dfdf832b312a750b93

Sean revealed months ago that keeping the photo there was a gesture from the King to remind Harry that he was still part of the family and not to forget that all he has left is his family.

In September 2025, Harry gave the King photos of the Sussex children. He believed the King would display those photos prominently, just as he does with photos of George, Charlotte, and Louis.

And that at some point those photos would be seen on the internet, making it clear that the King loves those children very much and blah blah blah

But that hasn't happened. So Claw has complained to Harry about, "See? My children don't matter to your father, my children aren't loved by your family, they don't care about them."

Why would the King love children he doesn't know, just because Harry and Claw don't want him to meet them?

But Claw had a bigger attack. Because a photograph of Claw and Harry that was once on display at King Charles’ Highgrove home has been moved from its original position. The photograph, which showed the Harkles on their 2018 wedding day, is no longer on display on a small wooden table at the home.

This was revealed by royal photographer Chris Jackson, who hosted an event at the estate and took a picture of the table where the wedding photograph once was. Chris’ photograph of the table, which he shared on Instagram, showed that the two photographs on display:

https://preview.redd.it/hjvikze1i70h1.png?width=590&format=png&auto=webp&s=643defa7f54029547bfce56834a3c0d351d3190b

These were the photos that were on that table, and they were there until 2024.

https://preview.redd.it/od9vju0ti70h1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=d7786c5ce788a1140055c34129d48c3aba680c95

In other words, not only are there no photos of the Sussex children, but Claw herself is being erased. Harry remains, but that's only because Harry is Charles's son.

Claw seems to have found out about this a couple of days ago. So she's preparing her counterattack. She's furious and won't let it go.

And that terrifies the King

https://preview.redd.it/4ys4by8vj70h1.png?width=464&format=png&auto=webp&s=1d3ed9005ecb269caa063d7c6a868ea1f180e657

INVICTUS. CRISIS BIRMINGHAM ..GETS WORSE FOR HARRY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5br23FJjqk

Sean says Harry has to show up in July. Whether he likes it or not. And you know, Harry's not going to like it because he'll have to explain what happened with Boing.

The people at Invictus don't care at all if Claw shows up. And they don't care if the kids show up either. Sean says those kids won't be traveling to the UK in July. But Harry has to show up because the Games are at risk of failing, and if that happens, it'll be his fault.

https://preview.redd.it/xv1nppcqk70h1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=dc1f04f19a1e5ed4cd3843f28d6e78254f37d33a

Because Sean says that's how bad things are for Harry with Invictus. There's a lot of internal conflict; I don't need to tell you because the disaster that's unfolding is public knowledge.

And within the organization, there are more people wondering why on earth they should continue with Harry. Harry is getting rid of those who challenge him, but that only makes things worse.

Harry believes everything would be alright if Pa attended the games in July, or at least sent a message. Harry hasn't realized that Pa doesn't want to because she agrees that the mess Invictus has become is Harry's fault.

Because everything in Invictus now revolves around the Harry and Claw drama. So the big names who might have wanted to be involved no longer do so because they'll be associated with Harry and Claw's drama. And that affects the sponsors because who's in Invictus now? The two kings of drama.

And although the Labour government put up 26 million, that's nothing compared to everything that needs to be managed, including dinners with potential sponsors.

That was Harry's job. And he failed.

So if Harry persists in the attitude he has taken, Invictus probably won't survive to make it to 2027. Because who would be in charge if Harry can't raise the money that's needed?

July will be Harry's worst month of the year. George's 13th birthday leaves Harry with less than five years for his worst nightmare to come true. Harry has already said that when George turns 18, he'll be irrelevant. And on top of that, Harry has to deal with his failure in Invictus.

https://preview.redd.it/1lxtmbtkp70h1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=dc9bf4cd58a2152caea02a7ea2c0db892fd9fa04

Meghan Markle is set to be offered a multi-million dollar deal to star in a big-budget new movie.

Studio chiefs want the Duchess of Sussex to reunite with her former castmates for a blockbuster big-screen version of her hit TV series Suits, a top Hollywood source has revealed

As well as co-starring in the film, executives are prepared to offer her a co-executive producer role that would enable her to earn a share of worldwide box office profits, according to the source, who said: “They believe it’s a no-brainer.

“The original Suits show still attracts a massive audience on streaming giants* Netflix *and Peacock as well as endless reruns on terrestrial TV stations across America – in large part because of the popularity of her character Rachel Zane.”

The cult following Meghan’s character attracted in the original show has continued to grow, however, since she and Harry arrived in America in March 2020 – and hit new heights via the two streaming networks.

Suits topped the Netflix charts for months on end between 2023 and 2025 and, in the summer of 2023 set a record – that still stands – of being watched around the world for 3.7 billion minutes in a single week.

Now show creator Aaron Korsh is, according to our source, in “advanced talks” with senior executives at Universal Pictures, the Hollywood studio that is a sister company to American TV network NBC, which aired his original series.

Korsh – who remains a close friend of Meghan – has declined to publicly comment other than to tease: “We might do a Suits movie. That could be fun.”

Meghan’s former co-stars, including Patrick J Adams, Gabriel Macht, Rick Hoffman, Sarah Rafferty and Gina Torres, are all said to have been “sounded out” about a big screen reunion and the source added: “All seem to be on board barring minor scheduling conflicts.

“Now it’s pretty much over to Meghan. There’s no doubt this would be a huge payday for her as well as maintaining a high-profile and restoring public goodwill that, aside from her core fans, has been falling away in recent years.”

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/2203395/meghan-markle-offered-starring-role

https://archive.ph/a1Adi

When has the character of Claw been a cult character?

YouTube is ablaze with videos about the end of The Boys, video after video analyzing the fifth season. Has anyone ever seen that for Suits?

Was this all Claw could come up with to try and overshadow Kate's trip to Italy? Bravo 🙄🙄🙄

https://preview.redd.it/x2c2kl5exzzg1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=8130473fd7a13012344eebede3fb5d11799f58d8

MARKLE & THE MISSING KIDS TAKES ANOTHER WEIRD TWIST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tf8pQI4beuY

We had a week where Harry said two completely opposite things. One day he said royal duties killed his mother, and the next he said he was born for the job.

https://preview.redd.it/hffo8mbrxzzg1.png?width=686&format=png&auto=webp&s=4a01a5c6e2ac895e2529042b0801885c13b24934

Sean has already mentioned that Harry has entered a state of brutal denial. We were already familiar with that side of him. I've always said that Angela Levin is absolutely right to be furious with Harry because he chose her to confide in, all as part of a process to clean up his image. Levin believed Harry had matured because she saw him finally working on something. So, realizing that Harry had blatantly lied to her and practically treated her like an old woman profiting off him was a tremendous blow, since Levin risked her career to support Harry, believing in his sincere attempt to get his life on track.

https://preview.redd.it/2usny9c5yzzg1.png?width=345&format=png&auto=webp&s=0018a503240a56b7b97f4fe0265986e483443039

But what's happening now is pathological. Harry said he left the BRF because he felt trapped and that he felt sorry for his father and brother who were trapped... and now he's angry because they won't let him back in. It's like Dusty Tyrone Porter, the guy who robbed an Arizona Domino's pizza shop just to get delivered back to prison. But with Porter's history, he's being honest and admitting he committed the robbery to get back to prison. Harry isn't even that; he doesn't want to acknowledge that what he said in the past was pure 💩💩💩💩

https://preview.redd.it/1tyrvt3u000h1.png?width=480&format=png&auto=webp&s=371b3303b6f13fd1e3e0203b46190a1b04fc3519

It's not like Harry couldn't have done something else. Edward did; he didn't want to work at the Firm and tried to find another job. And he has cousins ​​who do other things. But Harry had to speak up.

https://preview.redd.it/2iwzxfab100h1.png?width=259&format=png&auto=webp&s=d5760ae279d602a9ef7487d6415518c6da37770b

And all because nothing has gone his way. He decided to believe the former cable soap actress when she said they were going to be megamillionaires effortlessly.

And on top of that, they keep lying!!! Because this:

https://preview.redd.it/7fotqmuf100h1.png?width=1267&format=png&auto=webp&s=ebc389ea95a8c72624d6dd0ea9fe0399033d9056

is false.

The problem with NBC wasn't about SNL, but about the show As Ever. They were negotiating with Claw to appear on an NBC show... but she never mentioned she was negotiating with CBS. So, before they had finalized anything, NBC saw Claw with Drew Barrymore.

So NBC hasn't objected to SNL making fun of Claw because Claw earned that rejection from NBC. Sean says it even seems like she's blacklisted, and even if she wanted to, she can't appear as a guest on any show anymore.

But that doesn't worry Claw. What worries her is the restrictions she has NOW in her life.

Sean says that on the trip to Australia, Claw also opened her mouth. And she did so with someone who has turned out to be a source of gossip, because Claw told this person that she was increasingly fed up with the restrictions she feels she has in her life. She spoke in the present tense.

And here Sean refers to a source in Montecito. Because one of those restrictions is Harry's reluctance to show more of his children. Claw wants to show them completely because she believes that if they do, it will soften her and his image.

Claw is furious because the photo of Harry with supposedly the newborn Archie didn't receive even the slightest coverage that the photos of Louis and Charlotte did.

Harry doesn't want to show off his children because that's not the path he wants to follow. He wants to follow the path of the humanitarian philanthropist, etc. Claw doesn't. She wants to follow Beyoncé's path with Blue Ivy, North and Kim, Apple and Gwyneth Paltrow.

I don't think Claw really wants Lil'D, the "real European princess", to look like that.

https://preview.redd.it/cgbilqjw300h1.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=b1941c3b421bf9133bb4e560f937f139636ac9d8

North is another girl whose scandalous autobiography we're going to end up seeing.

The more trapped Claw feels, the more it's causing conflict with Harry. So much so that they were supposed to go together on that trip to Chicago, but she went alone and made sure she was seen by herself.

https://preview.redd.it/1crnbi2i400h1.png?width=1210&format=png&auto=webp&s=9c3ed229e6b59c8deb53a35945262ccebfec1b5f

Sean is saying that if Harry doesn't give in, she's going to start pushing the narrative of "he doesn't support me, I'm alone." Sean says she was going to start using him in Chicago but didn't push for it, but that behind the scenes, that story is brewing.

THIS PICTURE CREATED AN EXPLOSION FROM HARRY WHY?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11vCs-t_U0A

https://preview.redd.it/rvphn5fb500h1.png?width=194&format=png&auto=webp&s=9692f414066f2d3d927d558c288ab141360a4b69

This photo, according to sources, caused a crisis within Montecito.

You've already analyzed it, including the fact that something's off about Claw's finger. In fact, she bites her nails, and she bites them until they're raw. I recognize that because I have the same problem... when I'm stressed.

The problem here was that Claw was confronted with the fact that nobody really cared about the photo of Archie. Nobody in the press indicated they were expecting it, unlike the public anticipation of photos of Charlotte and Louis. And Claw couldn't publish photos of the back of Archie's neck because we already know what it looks like! So she had to publish a photo of his face. And she published this one.

Sean says this is another contradiction, because here they're exposing his privacy. That's a private, personal photo.

But...

Oh my god!!

I had to watch this video three times to understand why Harry is angry.

Because no, he's not angry because that photo was a private photo.

He's angry about his hair.

https://preview.redd.it/uocla3vd700h1.png?width=408&format=png&auto=webp&s=497156b3f7aac5d00d16d31c348208e8bafcb6e0

Claw posted the photo without asking Harry because she was too furious about the reaction to the photos of William's children. And it turns out that Claw apparently photoshopped Archie's picture.

Harry is really upset because his baldness causes him distress. That's why he gets angry when his baldness is noticeable. Sean already mentioned that when he appeared on Colbert's show the second time, Harry tried to position himself in a way that wouldn't highlight his baldness.

Harry is bothered by jokes about his baldness, because Harry is actually a very insecure person. And of course, Photoshop doesn't help him feel better.

https://preview.redd.it/xc6zcj16800h1.png?width=686&format=png&auto=webp&s=c66e889650220e104cf7bbd36d2e80c690f91ed1

Sean said that his former London hairdresser told the press that he had already suggested to Harry that he face reality, get rid of what little hair he had left and look more like his brother William. I think if that's what the hairdresser told him, it was like putting hot chili pepper on an open wound 😂😂😂

Sean says Harry should accept reality.

https://preview.redd.it/ln46if8j800h1.png?width=200&format=png&auto=webp&s=1c7d3592ce17173900da03e1b95723ca11ca2646

But deep down, the problem isn't that; it's that Claw is exploiting Harry's insecurity to convince him to post current photos of himself with the children... photos of the children's faces.

https://preview.redd.it/vswv878fc00h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=fcc344021e68e53384431eb964ede57543b745de

WILLIAM FURY OVER ANDREW- WHAT IS REAL?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fHrONKc538

https://preview.redd.it/woz051zic00h1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=03ee0c9a3246c9b7c934238889aacc20ef8f4eab

William knew it was a bad idea to send Andrew to Sandringham. He knew that sooner or later Andrew would be attacked and his safety would become a concern.

And that Andrew would try to exploit an incident to return to Windsor. Because, besides, he never wanted to go to Sandringham. Because, of course, the original alternative was to send him to Balmoral, because it's much more private, less exposed than where Andrew is now.

Andrew doesn't want to go to Balmoral, so he accepted Sandringham temporarily, while he figured out how to get back to Windsor.

William must feel like Po versus Adversary, the punching dummy

https://preview.redd.it/50lp958sd00h1.png?width=480&format=png&auto=webp&s=5bdeee7487e0584a30ac938bed756bbdab170aa2

Now, Andrew isn't going back to Windsor, and Sean says his sources have been adamant about it, because William doesn't want to attract either crazy people or the press to the area where he lives with his children. And Andrew has a bad habit of going for walks or horseback riding, provoking the press.

Eugenie's pregnancy puts things at a point where they really have to decide what to do. Because Andrew is going to put pressure on them, using the pregnancy (no doubt about it), Fergie will do the same (I can't believe she had a "friends with benefits" relationship with Diddy), and that puts the family in a situation where they have to make decisions again.

And every decision made about Andrew ends up being a decision about Harry as well.

So this developing story is one to watch.

https://preview.redd.it/kwmwb1y7dtzg1.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=812e75f257c5b65af9063d2bade15c932483caf0

WILLIAM. STEAMING - ROYAL SECURITY BLUNDER ESCALATES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOBTsWF727g

In this, and if you watch the videos you'll know it's true, Sean avoids talking about the royal children. Not even the Harkles children.

But ITV (vehicle inspection station) doesn't seem to share those same considerations. Especially not on a day like today.

https://preview.redd.it/8kkb2aymtszg1.png?width=1273&format=png&auto=webp&s=f4e3c8729486990dd601238f90d72a05187f25d2

On the very day it was revealed that a man was charged after allegedly threatening Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor near his new home in the Sandringham estate, ITV focused on George's new school (which is not yet decided) and his security.

And they spent a good amount of time talking about George's safety. Something that greatly upset William when he found out.

Sean points out that the best course of action would be for ITV to apologize and remove the video from that program.

But... okay, this is my impression. It seems that William's displeasure with that open and lengthy discussion about George's safety at his next school stemmed from the fact that the talk was led by Chris Ship. Yes, that Chris Ship, the same one who interviewed Harry in Ukraine. And that the program was hosted by Tom Bradby. It seems William isn't viewing that conversation on ITV as casual or innocent.

Sean doesn't explicitly say that William thinks that. But it's no coincidence that Sean mentions this situation after saying that William and Palace already know what was discussed. It even seems that William and Kate have already chosen a school, and that school is apparently reviewing the video to take measures for George's safety. So I think William sees it as very troubling. Sean prefers to downplay it, calling it a "stupid mistake," and that's why he suggests the channel apologize. But even he knows they won't. They won't apologize to William. They would have apologized, and they have apologized, to Claw. But not to William.

WILLIAM..FINALLY PUTS A STOP TO THIS WITH THE SUSSEXES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0feM5buM_E

What's most annoying for William is that Sean argues Harry deserves 24/7 security.

And as many of us have noticed—which is why I often post a series of videos together because they're all on the same topic—Sean starts today's video talking about Harry's security, something that makes less and less sense. Sean says he doesn't need it because all the journalists know that when he travels to the UK in september 2025, he stays at the Royal Lancaster Hotel, which is right on the edge of Hyde Park. 😈😈

When Sean wants to be mean, he's mean, because for quite some time he didn't mention where Harry stayed, but now he goes and blurts it out. And he does it because he makes it clear that everyone knows, and no one from the press is going to harass Harry.

https://preview.redd.it/59zg0zuryszg1.png?width=225&format=png&auto=webp&s=4479465f7d316ef1453e185b19e6267975701170

Sean points out that the King did offer Harry a room in one of the Palaces—St. James's or Buckingham Palace. Harry declined because he wanted a room at Windsor, to be near William and Kate. The answer was "No." And Harry apparently responded rudely to that rejection, because he decided to stay at private members' clubs. Not in hotels, but in private members' clubs.

That type of club that's a friend of a friend of a friend club.

William is fed up with Harry's game. I mean, "if I don't get what I want, I'll throw a tantrum."

https://preview.redd.it/7ci4k6mn4tzg1.png?width=320&format=png&auto=webp&s=1bcb3be887db645ab2c5ae61bb9c7b879dbb9846

But since Harry is Harry, surely if the king offered him a room in July, he might accept. Although, of course, now Harry has a problem: William is in charge of the final stage of renovations to Buckingham Palace.

Let me explain. Until recently, say September 2025, King Charles III had offered Harry the option of staying in a specific room at one of the palaces. That offer is no longer on the table because, given that Harry is a rude, foolish, 41-year-old child who throws tantrums, Charles got fed up. And he's put William in charge of this matter.

So now, Harry would need to formally request permission to occupy a room, following the proper channels. Because the King no longer wants to discuss this matter directly with Harry; it's now something William handles, since he's the one staying in certain places. And William doesn't want to talk to Harry, so Harry has to complete the paperwork like everyone else.

And Sean says, "Harry won't do it." About that, no doubt, he won't.

And this isn't about leaving him with the "responsibility" because William doesn't want to talk to Harry or hear his complaints. This is more about making it clear to Harry that he no longer has a direct line of communication.

Harry has completely ignored the fact that he needs to contact Clive Alderton if he needs or wants to inform the King of anything. He ignores this because he is the King's son. But now, when Harry starts throwing a tantrum, he's referred to William's office. Harry's complaints are getting bogged down in bureaucracy.

https://preview.redd.it/3obpc2qm5tzg1.png?width=210&format=png&auto=webp&s=b78c2638c1cd9842d82272d225483b0875d6a796

And every complaint that comes in, goes straight to the trash. Like Sean already told us about what happened when Harry wanted to visit the Queen's tomb. Harry's request, oops!! Into the trash.

So Sean says that in July, if the Harkles do show up, where will they stay? Not in Birmingham. But at a certain private club.

https://preview.redd.it/wco3xkrk6tzg1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=c466d909f786ee7ec74970af2174c51ecd97747b

MARKLE GOES INTERACTIVE - MADCAP PLAN EXPOSED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmvnwTdiap4

https://preview.redd.it/bcq00oqu6tzg1.png?width=582&format=png&auto=webp&s=c6b60a66e01fa7bbae64d746a16d834b5fbc14a5

Claw doesn't like her figurine at Madame Tussauds in London

Sean says he was at the premiere and that it was actually quite well done. He says this to make it clear that this isn't the reason for Claw's complaint.

Claw doesn't like the figure because she didn't think it was appropriate for her to have a wax figure; she saw herself as something much more serious.

https://preview.redd.it/52cljzkc7tzg1.png?width=259&format=png&auto=webp&s=abae539e0c3cd734f06dcfa0f4cf54dfa63ed1c7

What bothers Claw is that the royal website, where she truly deserves to be featured, is so outdated because it doesn't reflect her achievements.

Yes, she and Harry just can't seem to let that issue go.

But since BRF doesn't seem to understand Claw's greatness, she thought Netflix would.

She believed that when she launched the Netflix show, Netflix would do something like an interactive tour. In other words, they would recreate the show's kitchen, like they did with Central Perk from Friends.

https://preview.redd.it/ubx1gya1atzg1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=8f1a05498e7b8d1803e9a97f27ea0484a171fd1e

And she wanted that recreation to be done at Madame Tussauds in London. Her team pitched that idea to Netflix and the Museum, because they thought it was better than her being in the royal section... uhm, it seems no one told Claw that she and Harry haven't been in that section for years, but are instead in the micro-celebrity section, on the verge of being relegated to the basement.

Sure, maybe that would have been successful if the show hadn't been a huge flop very quickly, and Netflix hadn't dropped the Harkles because of it. And Sean says it's a good thing that happened because the recreation of Claw's kitchen wouldn't have been accurate either, since she didn't use her own kitchen on her show.

https://preview.redd.it/it8evodtctzg1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=bf88a24ec63b785a3a2b602d2dca3966630d8ad1

Don't blame Sean for some of the things I post here. Sometimes I don't understand him properly either. In fact, on more than one occasion I've had to watch a video six times to understand what the story is about. And sometimes I thought I understood, but I didn't. Even though I listen to them in English and turn on English subtitles, it's no use. YouTube's subtitles are awful 😭😭

https://preview.redd.it/wliu3pscfmzg1.png?width=700&format=png&auto=webp&s=84c52c83cc8031a14d277c9c593a949bffa25083

KEEP THIS SECRET BUT THIS WILL FINISH SUSSEXES IN US

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lb1_f9dxUy8

MARKLE’S NEW US NIGHTMARE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqubh54LwAA

When Harry wants to, he can make people feel comfortable when they talk to him. Even former employees who, as Sean mentioned, fled Montecito have said so. But not because of how Harry treated them, but because they found it unbearable to keep dealing with Claw.

That doesn't mean Harry is nice all the time. Not at all. We already know that if he throws a tantrum, he yells at everyone, including his father or grandmother. It's just that when Harry wants to (exactly, when he wants to), he can be a pleasant person.

Claw, on the other hand, annoys more and more people because it's becoming increasingly clear that she struggles to be nice to others, and she tries too hard to be nice when there's a camera around.

Harry is now very busy reviewing his father's entire tour. One curious effect of the King's visit was the considerable increase in foot traffic to shops like Highgrove and Buckingham Palace, as well as online orders and ticket bookings from American tourists. Good for the King! So there must be something to it: the monarch generates revenue for the UK (by the way, did you see that William paid almost £7 million in income tax? What a blow that must have been for the anti-monarchists who claimed he didn't pay taxes).

https://preview.redd.it/4wkxlifefmzg1.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=f26b072fe12d252d2fe521c0cdd09445afbd3d14

Harry... what's happened to Harry and his taxes? He's a private citizen, he's not exempt from paying taxes... I think.

Okay. Sean had already mentioned in another video that William, before the trip and after the attack, had sent a personal message to Trump thanking him for the invitation to the King, asking him to treat him well, and beginning to organize a trip for him and Kate to the USA. The date is still under discussion, but both Trump and the King are very keen for this visit to take place.

But as everyone has noticed, and yes, in this case clearly with the Harkles in mind, everything is being handled with considerable secrecy. Sean recounted the message, making it clear that it came from a source authorized by William to drop this bombshell on his brother.

So Kate's solo trip to Italy is a way to get her back on the road after a couple of years without a trip of that caliber.

William and Kate are organizing trips to the USA and Australia. And those will be proper royal tours. What will the Harkles do then to try and overshadow the trip? More chickens?

Well, whatever Claw does isn't going to work, because at "over 45 years old" (Sean said that, blame him) she's in decline no matter how much makeup she throws on (I said that 🤭🤭). And a big part of the problem is that it's not just in the UK, or in this sub, or in the USA, but it's almost a consensus among many people in many countries that Claw is a cold, ruthless, and insensitive woman, with a constant staff turnover.

https://preview.redd.it/eeex790gfmzg1.png?width=354&format=png&auto=webp&s=dbc57661f766fa9b8b5125518f49f4988a9099df

And that has nothing to do with her being a businesswoman, because what business?

And Sean says that Claw's problem is that she could adopt a Miranda Priestley-style persona. He had already recommended this to Claw in another video, when he told her that Mariah Carey embraced her diva persona, which sets her apart from other singers. Or what Paris Hilton did. Or like Jane Mansfield, who had an IQ of over 163 but played dumb blondes.

But Claw can no longer even pretend to be a good daughter now that Thomas is returning to the USA.

And that has the team worried, because they've spent almost six months trying to keep the topic out of the conversation. But no, a father with an amputated leg while his daughter plays the role of the ideal hostess and says "what a lovely family" isn't something easily forgotten.

So, in addition to all the bad things William and Kate are doing to poor Meghan, she now has to figure out what will happen with her father. Harry, as Sean recounted, has been trying to convince Claw to talk to her father since last year, especially after William ordered that Harry be told that if they so desperately want reconciliation, they should leave with Thomas Markle. Claw doesn't want to hear a word about it. Sean said that one of the biggest problems with Meredith Maines and Doria was precisely getting Harry and them to agree to Thomas meeting the children.

2026 hasn't been a good year for Claw, has it? Those seven years of bad luck seem to have no expiration date.

WILLIAM VS MARKLE “ YOU WILL PAY “

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkLyLekiMqU

THIS EVEN REACHED WILLIAM’S EARS - NEW DIVA DEMAND THREATENS ROYALS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCpom1JjgYo

After the big tantrum that was the Megixt, the Harkles depend on whatever money they can get.

https://preview.redd.it/2lf3egjhfmzg1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=8214ace0607f6e416e5d8e4fd3034ec940abcb53

And now they're strapped for cash because they don't have as much as they'd like.

Claw was confident that by marrying Harry, she'd always have millions to spend. And she's married to a guy who's never even seen a bank.

https://preview.redd.it/h2fawbmifmzg1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=7d0bac597816547db0be6a94d0cbc326f79aa002

And what makes Claw sick at night is knowing that the money Harry had, which was inherited from Diana, is already disappearing, versus the money William has, which will increase over time.

Claw put it into Harry's head that this wasn't fair, that he should have the same amount of money as William, because they were equal.

Especially after the Queen died, Claw seemed to constantly insist on knowing how much the Queen had bequeathed them. It appears the rumor that the Queen didn't even leave them a goodbye was true.

And as Sean recounted almost two years ago, Claw realized very late that the person who would truly have control over that fortune was going to be the only person she could never manipulate or ensnare: William. And that he was going to be the biggest obstacle to achieving the lifestyle she desired. Especially since Sean, in his account, makes it clear that Andrew and Harry's lack of understanding of money isn't because they're royals, but because they're clueless.

And this year it seems that making money from Invictus won't be an option either. Because they haven't been able to secure any sponsors.

And that has William on high alert. Ever since the Andrew and Fergie affair, William doesn't want to be around anyone with shady dealings. And Harry has shady dealings. William knows full well that Harry isn't exactly rolling in dough, but he has made money. Where is it? Where's the inheritance money? What did Harry do with it? No, it's not because William wants to meddle in it, but because he knows Harry will come knocking on his door sooner or later to pester him with, "You owe me my father's inheritance."

And of course, William knows that Harry will come knocking on his door after the debt collectors come knocking on Montecito's door, which, according to Sean, is burdened with several mortgages.

William seems to realize that it's inevitable he'll one day have to support Harry, perhaps with an allowance. But William wants to understand exactly why that will happen, why Harry will be his responsibility.

William's fear is that this won't happen in a few years, but rather while Charles is still alive, leaving him in the dilemma of having to give Harry money again, thus binding William to that obligation.

And that fear isn't just a potential one. William has learned that his sister-in-law has a monstrous ego. So much so that the reason we haven't really seen many pictures from Australia is that Claw is unhappy with what was filmed. Just as she's upset about how she came across in the photos from Sarandos' party.

She pressured Getty to delete those photos because her belly was visible in the area of ​​her dress. Honey, that's not the photographer's fault.

https://preview.redd.it/yforbuujfmzg1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=a655e1f368c119fead3e360b78f518744693ec9a

And here's where I don't understand, but Sean says that Getty's reason for agreeing to her was precisely that: she's married to Harry, and Harry is the king's son. But I think the crux of the matter is precisely that: Getty agreed to take some photos because Claw and Harry keep reminding everyone who they are, and that bothers William—that it's not understood that they aren't truly royals anymore.

But Getty's stance isn't going to last long.

https://preview.redd.it/ur8uekwkfmzg1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=6283562f06dd1737a95f7ff15777d96d82d27a5d

Not much gossip today. Tomorrow's another day! And we know the Harkles will do something silly

We're already seeing it, aren't we? Harry and his income aren't just a topic of gossip; they're becoming an increasingly common theme. The other day, Neil Sean was saying that the Harkles are starting to cut costs. Well, it seems Sean and Dan Wakeford are talking to each other and using the same sources, because this former People editor and current US Weekly editor was describing the same situation Sean described several videos ago: not only are the Harkles not swimming in money, but they've actually cut staff, leaving only five employees (three permanent and two part-time, as Sean says) and now working almost entirely with interns who, as Sean said, aren't exactly fond of the Harkles.

https://preview.redd.it/a56fimlmofzg1.png?width=700&format=png&auto=webp&s=6ab193f2bbba20716b9890dce1bb89a222e72856

This is leading Harry to accept what he otherwise would not have accepted.

HARRY'S SECRET CASH INJECTION ...JUST HIM

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2b3AOc6eBRhBcxYbaxRBag

MARKLE & THE VERY REAL 7 YEAR ITCH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9BjJe16nsQ

MARKLE HARRY BLOW IT - INVICTUS, DEMANDS &MORE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aag_6ywtNVk

LOOK AT THIS PICTURE- HARRY IS DONE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbQv9sFqqy4

ANNA MARKLE MET OFFER REVEALED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LoYOqke0Fs

MARKLE " ALL IT WOULD TAKE IS A POST" CRISIS POINT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqCYeB4Tyv8

MARKLE VS TRUMP - THIS JUST GETS WORSE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMYPbplZ0kE

Sean said his sources at Netflix have maintained contact with Harry for months. Only Harry. In fact, Sean said Harry still has an office at Netflix. It was supposedly maintained because Sarandos still wants to see what Harry will do with the Diana documentary, but he's not getting his hopes up, because, as Sean said, Harry hasn't managed to get anyone truly important involved, there won't be any new gossip, and Harry, absurdly, insists his wife have a significant role in it. Sean said that was also the big problem with the BBC and their last documentary about the Queen: Harry's insistence that Claw also be involved.

Netflix does have one successful show, The Crown.

https://preview.redd.it/kax1lm0oofzg1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=7079a030e5d756857d77d95fbde676f4c5ac2798

Sean says that the first part, lacking clarity on where Peter Morgan was taking the show, was good, mainly due to the charisma of the actors portraying Elizabeth and Philip. But then the show became controversial. Which Netflix loves—controversy.

So it's not surprising that Netflix hasn't completely abandoned the idea of ​​a miniseries about Andrew. It's not a done deal, but it's not abandoned either.

But Netflix intends to expand the "universe" of The Crown. That is, to tell the story from the end of Queen Victoria's reign, then what happened after her death, and up to 1947, to the preparations for Elizabeth's wedding to Philip.

And Sarandos wants Harry as "executive producer." Harry, not Claw. Just Harry, not Claw.

Sean says, "Well, what does he know about this?" Sean replies, "Well, he knows as much as he knows about Polo, or as much as he knows about Hearth and Invictus." In other words, Sean isn't saying Harry knows anything.

https://preview.redd.it/4g5ya20pofzg1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=c7c70c9fd054f81145bf786c190943e669311b8a

This is just one point in favor of selling it. I mean, having a series about the British monarchy with a British prince as a producer. Nobody's going to ask Harry anything about the history of that country because Harry doesn't even know where London is on a map.

But in this, Sean is saying that Netflix is ​​being adamant that they don't want Claw. And Sean says the reason is because Claw isn't a member of the Royal Family and only lived with them for a short time. Sean actually says, "She was only a member of the Royal Family for a nanosecond." 😈😈😂😂😂 And that doesn't mean anything. In short, people are wondering, what does she really know about the BRF?

Harry is not in a position to refuse now, or to force Claw's involvement, because they need that money, and it would be a welcome boost. But of course, Harry would only be there because he's still part of the BRF, being Charles's son.

Yes, Harry will profit from his title of "son of the King." So that's not going to help at all with the great family reconciliation Harry intends to achieve in July. Especially since Trump excluded Sarandos from the White House dinner precisely because the Queen and Philip were very upset by how they were portrayed in The Crown. Harry associating with those people Philip was going to sue doesn't sound very... well, it sounds like Harry being Harry.

Sean says that in any case, that wouldn't be Harry's problem. It would be Claw's. Claw couldn't bear to be left out, and it's Claw who really controls all the Harkles' money. Because what's hers is hers, but what's Harry's belongs to both of them.

In any case, this is a developing story. The show might happen, it might not. But Netflix seems to have made it clear that Claw is out of any deal. And for many good reasons.

And Harry is no longer so determined to force Claw's inclusion in his projects. And for many good reasons, too.

First of all, Claw doesn't seem to realize what she's saying. Because what she said about them ending the worst seven years of her life doesn't need much explanation: she's suffered a lot since meeting Harry. She's been the most trolled person in the world for the last ten years... that is, since she met Harry.

It's not just Sean: several reporters have said they heard that Harry was not only hurt but angry and apparently asked Claw if she had forgotten their wedding or their children.

Sean says his source within Montecito told him she feels sorry for Harry because she sees that Harry is upset by what Claw said, that she doesn't understand why he's upset, and that Harry realizes that no matter what he does for that woman, it will never be enough.

https://preview.redd.it/r0yvzc4rofzg1.png?width=750&format=png&auto=webp&s=4904a4dd85f0eef5e66d5c9fc2126c057044c219

The strangest thing is that this person has observed that Harry is very insecure in many ways, and Claw makes him feel even more insecure. Harry is now depressed and angry.

I don't regret that Harry feels so bad. It's not just that he was warned this would happen, but he also lacks the common sense to care about other people's feelings. Claw doesn't care about Harry's feelings. Harry doesn't care about what his father, his brother, his sister-in-law, his friends feel...

Especially since Harry is seeing that he's on the verge of losing Invictus, and much of it is due to Claw.

Here, Sean said in a past video that something happened behind the scenes between Harry, Invictus, and something related to Ukraine, involving a letter. Sean said he can't talk about it because he's been forbidden to, but things with Invictus have gotten increasingly strange. We already know this; Invictus is pretty shady.

One of the major long-standing conflicts, and one that's currently escalating, is that Claw refuses to promote Invictus products because she no longer receives any of the sales revenue. And it seems Invictus has told Harry that if Claw appears in July, he's forbidden from selling anything she uses online in that game.

https://preview.redd.it/xoz1kvfsofzg1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=1a2163ef0ed3b1157659d5c4ddfb08c08682cbcb

Of course, we're back to the point: if. If she does appear, it will be because the Harkles have secured 24/7 security... but that hasn't gone down well within Invictus either, because they see them as being used as leverage, not for the benefit of the games.

All this does not exactly help good relations with the BRF

Except when Claw has these strange public relations habits, like attending a child's first communion in Chicago. Has Claw suddenly become Catholic again? According to reports, the child is the son of "one of Meghan's close friends from her Northwestern University years," and she is also his godmother. This "close friend" is named Natalie, and she's a reporter at NBC.

Sean is always suspicious of this, because here we go, Claw introducing a new "friend" who's supposedly a longtime friend, but whom she's never mentioned until now. Another "friend" who wasn't at the second wedding. Sean prefers to avoid the question of whether Harry's wedding was really the second one 🤭🤭

And another "friend" whom Harry doesn't know and whom Claw doesn't want him to meet. The invitation to that ceremony was for both of them. And here there are two situations: 1) Claw doesn't like Harry going to places where she knows he might find out things she doesn't want him to know. 2) Harry didn't make any effort to go either. Because Harry knows people see him as a "curiosity," so he used the excuse that if he went, the whole thing would turn into a circus.

And always, always, this kind of "private" stuff appears in some tabloid in the United States.

https://preview.redd.it/a265w9duofzg1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=8495a00873895a37f6e704a0ee565ec5947e8ebb

But the curious thing isn't that, but rather that the photo has been disappearing from social media. And the reason isn't that Claw doesn't think she looks good. It's because Claw traveled to Chicago privately without requiring security.

https://preview.redd.it/vwvmleavofzg1.png?width=194&format=png&auto=webp&s=2865c77e5ed3013bbfde6b90c67707a460cbbb6b

In other words, nobody knew she was traveling, she had minimal security, and nothing happened. Just when Harry is completely focused on securing her 24/7 security. Harry has less than two months left before July, before the supposed grand return that will be a complete failure if the government denies him.

The most obvious thing about this photo is that if no one had said anything, nobody would have noticed Claw was there. Nobody cared, because who were the important ones? The children at their First Communion.

This situation also presents an additional problem that Sean doesn't mention. While marrying a Catholic is no longer grounds for exclusion from the line of succession, being in that line and being Catholic is.

In other words, Harry is... let's suppose he's Anglican. He's the one in the line of succession, so he married Claw, who is supposedly Catholic, because to be a godmother one must be baptized in the Catholic faith, have received First Communion and Confirmation, and lead a life consistent with the faith. If she was recently in her First Communion, what is she, Anglican or Catholic? And what religion are their children being raised under? Because if Claw is Catholic, are Archie and Lil' D Catholic? If they are, they are automatically excluded from the line of succession.

https://preview.redd.it/8h8h43awofzg1.png?width=736&format=png&auto=webp&s=6b648dd464a45384e195abd98472a2f4d6c746af

Claw may be of the Maradonian religion, but his children are either Anglican or out of the line of succession., but his children are either Anglican or out of the line of succession.

Claw doesn't realize what she says or does 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

Claw can't control herself. She couldn't even wait to thank everyone who came to her son's birthday party over the weekend... wasn't his birthday May 6th? Claw was really upset about not being invited to the Met Gala! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Oh no, of course I was invited, but I had so many things to do, like my son's birthday and my godson's First Communion. Two much more important events than the Met Gala, which I've wanted to attend for years.

Harry is upset about all of this because Claw is too drawn to the celebrity world. He doesn't like it. He really tried hard to do a good job in Ukraine, and even in Australia. Harry sees that Australia was a failure, but he doesn't see that as his fault, because what he did was fine.

And in this, Sean knows how to handle himself on those tours. It's not that he does it perfectly, but Harry at least tries to do a good job. Claw doesn't. Claw barely arrives before she wants to leave. It's too obvious that Claw is faking empathy or sympathy. And Harry is many things, but he couldn't ignore that the biggest criticism of the Australian tour is being directed at Claw because of all the mistakes she made. And Harry sees that the Australians are upset, which makes him uncomfortable because he has good memories of Australia; he toured there before meeting Claw and it went well for him.

Claw was unable to even pretend that she liked this painting.

https://preview.redd.it/an5mlh9xofzg1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=e1bd2c699300a5a6302d6d5c1aebbf24d5d27ebf

Claw hasn't shown any of the gifts she received from Australia... after telling a magazine she was grateful to Australians. So, of course, she's receiving harsh criticism from the Australian media.

Sean says the Harkles are leading very separate lives. Because Harry is focused on returning to being a senior royal, while Claw isn't. And now, Harry's concern is how to retain Invictus, while Claw's is how to get to the 2027 Met Gala.

But Claw ruined it with Anna Wintour.

https://preview.redd.it/9yx0us1yofzg1.png?width=767&format=png&auto=webp&s=89c991a2076f32b5914418048a874bbb990c9123

Not just because of what Claw did to the Queen. Not just because Claw ruins everything she wears. But Anne knows Claw is incapable of telling the truth in an interview.

Anne knows Claw is dying for a Vogue cover, so Anne Wintour seems to have responded, "Look, let's do an interview first, but you have to answer something: Why did you turn your back on the most famous family in the world? The real story."

Sean says that Anne Wintour would only be willing to let Vogue interview Claw if Claw answers those kinds of questions—a revealing interview, not one prearranged with Claw where Claw provides the questions and answers ready-made.

Anne Wintour sees that Claw is incapable of giving that interview, the one that would be the only thing to sell that issue of Vogue—something similar to what happens in The Devil Wears Prada 2, the revelations. But Anne knows that Claw won't do it, that Claw wants to save it for a book. So, since Claw won't accept that condition, there's no reason for Vogue to deal with Claw's demands. Claw isn't as famous as she thinks.

https://preview.redd.it/sodjfsuyofzg1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=e4c4b8b294721bf3f165203d87bba53c0bca4729

WILLIAM KNEW THIS ABOUT MARKLE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KcqYfJ8m38

MARKLE'S CREEPY DIANA OBESSION ESCALATES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDK7RlIhGNk&vl=es

WILLIAM -HARRY & HIS NEW ROYAL CONNECTION

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3fCLg7CFVM

Much of what Sean is saying—and it's not gossip, we're actually seeing it—is something William also sees. And that's why he keeps his distance from Harry and the Harkles.

So no, there's no chance William will extend an olive branch. The Harkles make the same mistake over and over again. And the mistake William can't forgive in Harry is that Harry does everything his wife tells him and wants. Even the Queen saw it, and saw it as a mistake, that Harry was too in love with Claw. And Claw's mistake is constantly provoking the BRF.

And the Harkles always fall into the same trap, even though Claw spends the whole day reinventing herself.

Like the fact that Claw wanted to use the surname Spencer, and when Charles Spencer, and here Sean always makes it clear that it was not in a friendly way at all, refused, became Sussex, to become Markle again.

Now, Sean says that the idea of ​​changing the surname to Spencer wasn't Harry's, and he knows this from an excellent source... which is easy to deduce because he learned the whole story from Charles Spencer himself. It was Claw who insisted, and Harry... yes, that's right, he ended up doing what she wanted.

William was very upset about the request that Claw could use the Spencer surname, something William seems to have found out about quite early on, when Harry started messaging his uncle. Sean doesn't say that William intervened, and Sean doesn't say it because it wasn't necessary. Sean already explained that Charles Spencer doesn't want that surname remotely associated with the Harkles' toxicity, especially since his daughters are conducting business using the Spencer name.

But none of that helps William feel anything other than hurt that Harry and Claw tried to appropriate Diana's name. Not only was it disrespectful to the King, his father, but the Harkles wanted to be the only ones to use Diana for their own benefit.

Because it's true, Claw's obsession with Diana is very chilling. And Sean has already mentioned in other videos that William is upset because Harry won't leave his mother's memory alone.

William is bored with Harry using the Diana Card all the time.

https://preview.redd.it/kgr785l0pfzg1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=8d5e1d0355baaa1fd65bedefbb47c1ba37021d15

It seems... guys, these are just rumors, so unless Sean or I explicitly state "this is a fact," everything else is just rumor.

Well, I'll put this one like this: I hope it's just a rumor, because as Sean says, it's very embarrassing.

During their 1988 tour of Australia for the Bicentennial celebrations, Prince Charles and Princess Diana attended a surf carnival at Terrigal Beach in New South Wales in January 1988.

And Diana took this photo, which Sean says was widely reproduced by all the media.

https://preview.redd.it/52xnz4o1pfzg1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=cf99cdca2cd82f3500bf6c8e6e1efb90191d060f

You've got where I'm going with this. That's why I sincerely hope it's just a rumor, because it would be truly embarrassing.

Claw apparently wanted to recreate this image... on Bondi Beach.

Sean says the proposal was indeed made, but it didn't materialize. And thank goodness, because not only would it have confirmed Claw's obsession with Diana (as if we needed more proof), but it would have been a "Sentebale Polo Tournament 2.0"—Claw trying to steal the trophy from someone who truly deserved to be on the podium.

But Claw desperately wanted to recreate this situation. I believe that; Claw is that obsessive about what she wants. What I don't understand is why she didn't see that it was a terrible idea.

However, the King's trip to the USA did benefit Harry somewhat. The monarchy is popular in the USA, and Harry can continue to leverage his status as the King's son to gain some money and attention.

But of course, Harry had to watch all of this from afar.

So Harry is desperately trying to contact one person: his sister-in-law, Kate.

He knows that the only person who could convince William and the King to let Harry get his half-in, half-out is her. Harry can't talk to his father or brother because they don't want to talk to him. And neither does Kate.

Sean says that the rumor Christopher Andersen told about Kate being furious with Harry over that BBC interview where he said he wanted to get closer to his father because he didn't have much time left seems to be true. It seems Kate was very angry to hear that. I can completely understand that.

But Harry believes he can contact her... through Pippa. He thinks he can still talk to Pippa because they got along well around the time of William's wedding. Harry doesn't seem to grasp that 15 years have passed since then. He doesn't realize that Pippa is married, has her own children, and that she would never, ever bother her sister about this.

Now, it's not so much that Harry wants to apologize to his family or anything like that, but rather that he wants his children to have a relationship with his brother's children.

Do you think Harry is that naive? I do.

I don't know if anyone mentioned this article.

https://archive.ph/QIPSF

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/2201969/meghan-markle-king-charles-state-visit

https://preview.redd.it/zcyjzkb0sczg1.png?width=590&format=png&auto=webp&s=4ceabd9d3fa67c9b6a4a1d14d5e16d23c3af98d9

Meghan Markle has reportedly been left “fuming” after King Charles’s latest state visit to the US. The King and Queen spent four days across the pond last week, rubbing shoulders with US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania, who rolled out the red carpet for their royal visitors.

[...]reports claim Charles’s recent meeting with Mr Trump has left Harry “on tenterhooks” about his future with the royals.

Sources added that while Harry is focused on potentially resolving his row with his royal relatives, Meghan thinks he needs to step in.

A source told Closer magazine: “Harry is doing his best to stay pragmatic and anytime questions about why Charles is meeting with Trump come up, he’s quick to point out that it’s simply part of his father’s role. But he does admit that the whole situation has been keeping him up at night.”

“Of course, it’s tough for Harry to sit on the sidelines while his dad breaks bread with someone who seems to want to have him and his wife thrown out of the country.”

The source added about Meghan’s approach: “In her view, this is exactly the kind of situation where Harry should be standing his ground, not making excuses for his father. Meghan is fuming and saying it sends the wrong message if they let this go unchallenged.

“She’s taking it very personally and doesn’t understand how Harry can simply sit back and try to explain this away.

The source is https://closeronline.co.uk/celebrity/news/prince-harry-response-king-charles-refuses-to-see-him-trump-visit/

https://preview.redd.it/kc9s7n9wsczg1.png?width=1540&format=png&auto=webp&s=2b9c03e24d5ae82e50dd28f4387c1d89c832e2dd

However, from a personal viewpoint, our source says Harry and Meghan are struggling to accept that Charles appears to be making no moves to defend them.

The insider says, ‘Harry understands, albeit reluctantly, that it’s the King’s duty to maintain a relationship with anyone who holds office [as US President]. But the fact Trump has seemingly made it his mission to discredit and tear them down right before he welcomes his father and stepmother to America is something he can’t get past.

‘For Meghan it beggars belief that Charles is allowing this bile and slander from Trump go unanswered or defended They’re just praying it doesn’t spiral out of hand if Trump gets a chance to run them down to Charles one-on-one. It triggers and worries them in equal measure, especially after Charles has refused to Harry during his time in America.’

If you haven't choked from laughing so much at this, please read this.

Meanwhile, we recently reported that, ahead of his trip to the UK in July for the Invictus Games, which will be held in Birmingham, Harry had been hoping that he and Meghan could again float the idea of pursuing a ‘half in, half out’ role as part-time working royals.

The idea had been previously rejected back in 2020, but following the success of their Australian trip earlier this month, a source told us, ‘Harry feels he’s very close to getting Charles to agree to allow him and Meghan to be working royals on a part time basis.’

However, we’re now told that his father’s alleged refusal to see him and the monarch’s show of friendship with Trump has left Harry on tenterhooks about what this could all spell for his future.

The insider says, ‘Things are so delicate right now; it’s definitely not out of the realms of possibility that Trump could torpedo everything that Harry has been working towards with his father. The fear is could prompt his father to side with William and others – right when they’re making progress and finally rebuilding bridges with key members of the Firm.

‘Harry is doing his best to stay pragmatic and anytime questions about why Charles is meeting with Trump come up, he’s quick to point out that it’s simply part of his father’s role. But he does admit that the whole situation has been keeping him up at night.

Following Harry’s surprise visit to Ukraine last week, where he spoke out about the need for ‘American leadership, Trump hit back, going as far as to claim he was ‘speaking for the UK more than Prince Harry’. In the next breath, he called Charles a ‘friend of mine’ and said they were going to have a ‘great time’ when he came to visit.

‘Fact is, Charles does seem to have quite a fondness for Trump, whether that’s something Harry wants to acknowledge or not, the source says now.

‘Of course, it’s tough for Harry to sit on the sidelines while his dad breaks bread with someone who seems to want to have him and his wife thrown out of the country. And the fact that he’s not getting the same level of attention from Charles that Trump is only makes it worse. Harry is biting his tongue because he knows reacting will only stir up more trouble but it’s been very difficult, especially because Meghan does not want to give Charles a pass on this.'

I'd tell them this is nonsense invented by the people who write these news stories if it weren't for the fact that only the Harkles are capable of believing that the visit to Australia was a success. Nobody believes that, only them 🤣🤣

But now we understand why TW didn't have a diplomatic career. Because TW and Harry never really grasped why the King went to the USA. That the King had to worry about them and defend them against Trump? Good grief!

https://preview.redd.it/98oc6s97pzyg1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=f543ce62092d32e7226cd7fcf22657ef26973532

Claw, there are people in this world who are harassed and trolled more than you. Eiza Gonzalez, for example. And yes, she deserves it. Or Angela Aguilar. And yes, she deserves it. Just like you, Claw.

https://preview.redd.it/l094iisunzyg1.png?width=1299&format=png&auto=webp&s=8c351287803a4bb04a0ffe105aff524ffe60c96a

SNUBS, SUCCESS & MONEY LOST ..A BUSY WEEK

https://youtu.be/pd2HVjMpBlw

Melania is a woman who has been trolled for years. I won't even mention Camilla: she's in a whole different league when it comes to being trolled. But they don't cry like the ones I mentioned above.

Because they've taken control of their narrative. Especially Melanie.

But Claw, instead of learning to do it well, does it terribly. Because what you always get with the Harkles is one contradiction on top of another.

When you first get into this series, you often think the reporters are the ones making things up. But then you discover that the problem is the Harkles. They do one thing, then another, then the opposite, all in the same week.

And nobody could possibly claim that Claw actually believes in astrology!

https://preview.redd.it/34vle90oqzyg1.png?width=700&format=png&auto=webp&s=67e1640c5e95381d948bf68d198db4a9c290758f

Sean mentioned something I also heard from a Chilean journalist. What are these people doing? They're simply rotating the predictions. What was supposedly happening to Cancer today, will happen to Taurus tomorrow.

The absurd thing is that Claw complained the last seven years have been the worst of her life... the years you've been married to Harry? Yes, I believe it, being married to him must be awful!!! That's why the scented candles, right?

But Claw's statement made no sense, because didn't she say a few months ago that she and Harry were on a honeymoon or second honeymoon? Isn't the Perfect Housewife happy?

So, didn't she create a program because she wanted to show how happy she was and wanted to share that happiness with people?

https://preview.redd.it/ht6sumrvrzyg1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=b0c0ca504947a0c0d0de63e388933bf9fb931d82

This is a story where nothing makes sense, like a woman preparing a bag of peanuts for a lifelong friend who's allergic to them. Or you have a friend of Claw's, to whom Claw sent chocolate, despite publicly stating that she doesn't like chocolate.

Claw never remembers anything about other people. You can tell her your deepest secrets, and she won't remember them because if it's not about her, she doesn't care about anything.

And that way of seeing people carries over to how she sees her own business. She was convinced that a couple of days in Australia would be enough for As Ever to become a major company in that country. She's incredibly stubborn about the fact that she needs to work on a brand. Some people take years for their product to actually sell. Years of mistakes. Claw knows nothing about that, and that's why her big speech at the women's retreat was met with a lukewarm reception, because she was talking about how to have a successful business to women who had been running successful businesses for years and who knew she was just spouting empty rhetoric.

https://preview.redd.it/lzzcd1r510zg1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=9ed5177e45a6845d712f7a9c1021ae593ed22486

Claw didn't investigate who her hostess was, nor did she properly check the hotel, nor did she verify anything. Knowing why she would be the "main attraction" was enough for her to agree to go and do nothing. And yes, the idea was precisely to have money without doing anything, but then she complained about the negative criticism she received from the same attendees of the event.

And one thing that caught Sean's attention, who knows about advertising, is the fact that if Claw was promoting herself as a businesswoman with a successful company, where was the As Ever branding? Where was the backdrop, the banner, anything? Nothing. Not even Claw managed to bring appropriate gifts. And much of that, Sean points out, was due to something that happened with the team: Claw assigned some tasks to people who, before the trip, had either been fired or had fled Montecito.

Claw thinks she can be a businesswoman, but she's never run a business. She's had minor roles in a soap opera, as Sean says. And here's something: many people say that William was practically on vacation from 2011 to 2015 when he became a senior royal. No. Charles had him studying everything Cornwall represented, and everything he had done in Wales. Every cooperative, everything connected to Highgrove, etc. William had to study business administration and attend all the council meetings in Cornwall and Wales representing his father. That's why, when William faced the challenges of Earthshot or social housing, he didn't approach it from a position of "I know best" but as someone who had learned the ropes. And continues to learn.

Now, to add insult to injury—and this is a fact, not gossip—because Sean had someone with him at the event, there was no group photo. Because there weren't enough people to fill the table where the photo would have been taken.

https://preview.redd.it/tkb9t8v220zg1.png?width=498&format=png&auto=webp&s=e4916720c4bad0c73bd5a0b4267b0bffa6931897

Remember that there was an extra charge for that. There were... 50, 70 attendees? Someone counted them. And the vast majority didn't pay extra for that photo.

So, as seen in a video circulating online, Claw took individual photos with some of the attendees... but they later discovered that Claw had done something that broke the agreement.

Claw arrived in Australia and almost immediately, wherever there was someone with a camera, she offered selfies and even recorded birthday greetings, like a walking Cameo.

And all of it for free.

Make no mistake, it wasn't out of generosity. Claw always complained that the Queen wouldn't let her sign autographs. And that's all Claw dreamed of: being mobbed for autographs.

https://preview.redd.it/yjgfm45l30zg1.png?width=245&format=png&auto=webp&s=c7d89d3bad3e705a212c5afcf77fb5934320eb0c

So people who had a camera are sure to have Claw suddenly appearing everywhere.

So the women who participated in that retreat weren't happy. But Sean's friend took it in stride because she's neither a follower nor a fan of Claw, nor did she have any illusions about her. According to Sean, she told him, "Look, I wasn't too worried. I knew what I was getting into. She's very rich, very successful." But she did say that other attendees were angry because the promotion was that this was going to be the only opportunity to approach Claw and take a picture with her.

The one who has no problem with there being many, many, many, many, many... many, many, many, many, many.... many, many, many, many, many... many, many, many, many, many women (and surely men too) who want to have their picture taken and take a selfie, is the Major Hottie

https://preview.redd.it/46pjfq1x40zg1.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=e661f2f7b946347a07fc0b3352a1d41c9109b9ec

The Elizabeth II version of John Brown.

https://preview.redd.it/wnst0ke650zg1.png?width=330&format=png&auto=webp&s=1e24ad61b6fc9236409cc498b6eb00c527b105ac

According to Sean, Queen Elizabeth was realizing that at certain events she needed to attract attention. And a middle-aged lady in colorful dresses wasn't enough. So she brought what she considered "glamorous but somewhat vulgar." In other words, a handsome guy who would make the girls swoon. Just like Brown did more than a century ago.

Sean recounts an anecdote about when the Queen was at Balmoral around 2022, when the world met Major Hottie, and some advisors told her, "Your Majesty, many people are asking about Major Johnny," and she replied, "Oh, I know, isn't he lovely? He gives the ladies something to look at."

https://preview.redd.it/zl8hkn0i80zg1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=4b005e43b4fc2a6a0cf554213d864ee3d9750ccd

So, generous as she was, she brought Major Hottie into our lives, God bless him and the Queen!!!!

Harry hates him, he hates him deeply. In fact, there's no doubt about it, it's a fact: Harry hates Thompson because Thompson holds the position Harry discarded. And Thompson has been so loyal that he remains by the King's side even though his duties as an equerry had ended.

So, as his fans already know, he was in the USA with the King.

https://preview.redd.it/24h0qhs560zg1.png?width=1026&format=png&auto=webp&s=2d8ed8a2e0c2f84a40639e7e015b019a4a2bd13a

He wasn't just there because, of course, he's completely trusted by the King, totally ready to do whatever the King needs, and knows how to interpret him very well. So we saw Thompson organizing, protecting the King... but he was also there because, as Sean says, Queen Camilla also thinks he's handsome and that he would be a delight for the American ladies. Yes ma'am, he is 😍😍😍

So imagine that poor devil at the palace, having to take calls from the USA. On top of Harry's millionth complaint, now he had to answer questions from many people, especially women, about Major Thompson. 🤣🤣🤣 It's the same every time the king goes on tour 🤣🤣

Well, many women, especially at the garden party, wanted selfies with him, but he was working, so he made his excuses. Because they say that's just how he is—very kind, and very shy too. But he still made the news.

That's soft power.

https://preview.redd.it/aie6rqlt80zg1.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=83844a20e76bbd0c0ed31f68b6f8cedd2b34bdef

But nothing is a coincidence in the royal world. Because Sarah and the Queen knew each other. Sarah Jessica Parker was in London as part of the judging panel for the 2025 Booker Prize. She had her own publishing imprint called SJP Lit, and this is why she was selected to be one of the judges of the esteemed literary prize.

https://preview.redd.it/gycgqjn890zg1.png?width=2560&format=png&auto=webp&s=69f9b62593a0328aaea291e84ca16cd665c3b8e1

And Camilla, generously and shrewdly, was with Sarah at the New York Library, a connection to the Sex and the City movie. These are the kinds of gestures that Claw fails to grasp, gestures that make the monarchy what the British monarchy is.

Claw wants to be Carrie Bradshaw. She wears Manolos, and she thinks dressing in Valentino makes her elegant. But it doesn't. It doesn't work that way.

https://preview.redd.it/ogsq4ra1b0zg1.png?width=299&format=png&auto=webp&s=f83b3644967a0931bc51873c3e3560a649a5e17f

And a big part of the problem is that Claw never understood that she has to buy that particular outfit and then have it altered. But fewer and fewer designers want to work with her. She wears designer clothes and receives well-deserved negative reviews because she ruins what she wears.

So it's not proving easy for Claw to break into the fashion world. I wonder why.

https://preview.redd.it/iuddt4aob0zg1.png?width=686&format=png&auto=webp&s=c27c14ea6130f8ec8ad9dad32fc810ed74729299