r/SaintMeghanMarkle

‘Absolutely nothing’: Royal Family send telling message to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry after Sussexes' very public anniversary celebration. And why should the RF celebrate the marriage of the dimwit son and his gold digger? Hardly something to be pleased about.

‘Absolutely nothing’: Royal Family send telling message to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry after Sussexes' very public anniversary celebration. And why should the RF celebrate the marriage of the dimwit son and his gold digger? Hardly something to be pleased about.

https://archive.ph/dNZr9

Why do the harkles and their supports think EVERYTHING should be played out in public?

The prince of privacee and the douchess of don’t look at me, complain furiously in they don’t get attention.

u/Harry-Ripey — 14 hours ago

I highly respect and applaud both Harry and Meghan's commitment to charity and I'm calling on the press to cease these relentless and untrue assassinations on their character that are spuriously crafted on an almost daily basis. Who said this and when?

https://www.instagram.com/p/B1WdU9tDdsy/

And … To maintain a high level of much-needed protection, we provided them with a private jet flight. To support Prince Harry’s commitment to the environment, we ensured their flight was carbon neutral, by making the appropriate contribution to Carbon Footprint

‘ I wanted the young family to have a private holiday inside the safety and tranquility of our home.’

Young family? lol…both nudging middle age so far from young.

Yet just this week the poor old douche was reduced to flying with British Airways…is security no longer a problem or is finding a useful fool getting more difficult?

August 2019.

reddit.com
u/Harry-Ripey — 11 hours ago

Meghan’s Geneva speech used the same arguments published by medical expert Dr Dana Suskind

Posting for KilnTime.

Controversial portions of Meghan Markle's speech in Switzerland for the Lost Screens memorial were plagarized from an article written by Dr. Dana Suskind and published in The Chicago Tribune on April 30, 2026, days before Meghan's speech.

Specifically, Dr. Suskind, who was writing about the dangers of AI in social media and the inadequate response from social media platforms (and who quoted research showing that economically disadvantaged families were more concerned with physical threats than social media threats) wrote:

“We would never accept a food safety system that required parents to individually test every product for toxins before feeding it to their child. Instead, we regulate the food supply.

“We would never accept a policy that ensured car safety for wealthy children but not their low-income peers. Instead, we require car seats and seatbelts. We don’t outsource public health to individual families.

“And make no mistake: The potential developmental harms of AI slop are a public health concern. Rather than leaving it up to parents to navigate this risk (or not) on their own, we need universal, platform-level solutions."

Sound familiar? Meghan used the exact same arguments in her speech.

She could have credited Dr. Suskind and actually given her speech more strength by quoting or referring to a pediatric surgeon known for her research and writing on early brain development. But then she would not have gotten the credit.

(Credit for this information goes to Lyndadavis6829, who made a comment on Tom Sykes video " The $64 Distraction" on YouTube. I just followed the breadcrumbs. Dr. Suskind's article can be read here: https://www.chicagotribune.com/2026/04/30/opinion-artificial-intelligence-ai-youtube-kids/)

u/Mickleborough — 12 hours ago

The Guardian takes delightfully snarky aim at the anniversary candle

Mods: I searched for this link and didn't find it, but if it's a duplicate, please delete.

The Guardian has a delightfully snarky, tongue-in-cheek article about TW's ridiculous eighth anniversary candle. I love the snark, but I also really love some of the really specific call-outs:

Price: Yours for just $64, which is roughly £48.

Sorry, that is objectively too much for a candle. Oh come on, it’s for an anniversary. What better way to mark a special occasion than with a beautiful scented candle?

I suppose when you put it like that. What’s the big occasion? The eighth wedding anniversary of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

(NB: Interesting here that only Hazbeen has a hyperlink to his name. It goes to a page that houses a bunch of articles about him, which is common for the BRF and celebrities. when I edit the back half of that link to read 'Meghan-Markle,' I get a 404 error.)

That’s it? Come on, where’s your sense of romance? Isn’t there a tiny part of you that wants to drop half the cost of a weekly shop (emphasis here mine and added) on a candle that says “I recognise that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have now been married for eight years”?

Without going into politics, because that's not what this page is for, the world writ large is feeling economic pressures. Costs of everything have gone up astronomically, and inflation is absolutely outstripping income increases through COLAs, promotions, etc. People are tightening their belts across all areas of discretionary spending, and very few people are going to drop $64/£48 on a candle that they can't smell and that has a 50-50 chance of turning up without a wick.

Also--it's not new. It's the same old tired candle she's been shilling since the get-go. It's not even like she updated it for the anniversary.

Further on in the article:

Glad we’re agreed. I mean, who is this for? Markle’s jams I understand, (N.B.: This link goes to a two-year-old article with a critical headline and content, so the language used for the link is deceiving) because everyone likes jams. I can even understand her other candles, because who doesn’t like a candle?

Sure. But a candle you have made on the assumption that people will want to celebrate an arbitrary wedding anniversary? Come on, Markle, you’re not exactly making it easy to root for you. (Emphasis here mine and added.)

Archived link here, thanks to user MissScarlett25!

Archived link here!

reddit.com
u/ElleEmGee — 13 hours ago

Meghan monetises her designer wardrobe again via AI platform OneOff... as she uploads more than £92,000 worth of clothing and jewellery - Daily Mail

Tell us something we don't already know. These are all the clothes (I refuse to call them looks) that she wore in her nauseating As ever site update.

The Duchess of Sussex has attempted to monetise her wardrobe once again via the AI platform OneOff, but prices are so high that shoppers must request the cost of one dress from the designer. (That is the Oscar de la Renta dress she wore to the ESPYs).

In one shot, Meghan can be seen sporting a £67 Anine Bing Amani Tee with £1,250 Ragnar Pleated Wool Straight Leg Pants from celebrity-favourite, The Row. She paired the look with her £47,578 Logan Hollowell Fortuna Diamond Tennis Necklace and £5,135.50 Birks Diamond Cluster Jacket Earrings.

The mother-of-two repeatedly revealed her fondness for the Danish brand Anine Bing and also wore the brand's £208 Brie  Jeans in another clip, paired with a £461 Celine Cropped Shirt in Striped Cotton, purchased from the designer resale website Winnie Modo.

Her third outfit, seen as she smells flowers, was largely from Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen's brand The Row, including its £1,480 Naius Wool Sweater and £1,620 Nari Wool Mock-Neck Sweater.

She paired the knitwear with £270 Carrie Twill Straight-Leg Pants from Anine Bing and the Pippa Small 18kt Herkimer Metamorphic Cup Ring, which is handmade in Jaipur, India, and costs £950.

Perhaps her dressiest ensemble was one reminiscent of her second wedding day look by Stella McCartney - her Oscar de la Renta Fluid Halter-Neck Gown (price available on request) matched with a £2,250 Celine Colonne Jacket in Diagonal Wool.

The Duchess went for a more casual look with her next outfit - the £155 Polo Ralph Lauren Oxford Long Sleeve Button Up Shirt and £241 Tracey James Collection Upper Village Jeans.

She accessorised with The Clips from Crown Affair, priced at £43, and her £7,050 Cartier Love Bracelet and £22,000 Cartier Tank Française 21.2mm Small 18-Karat Gold Watch.

The final ensemble included a £221 Christian Dior Silk Love Sleeve Blouse, the £225 'Kate Jeans' from Anine Bing, £820 Chanel Ballet Flats and the Cord Woven Leather Belt from The Row, costing £810.

It just goes to prove, Sinners...money can't buy you class.

Archive: https://archive.ph/ZEEZX#selection-1005.0-1015.198

u/wenfot — 12 hours ago

Is Mindy secretly a sinner? 🧐

See the excerpt in the third image:

On a visit to Kaling’s Los Angeles office for a Bustle cover story, writer Ashley Spencer spotted an item with a royal connection: a bedazzled picture frame with the words “Never Complain, Never Explain” embroidered on mustard yellow fabric.

u/margotmary — 12 hours ago

subreddit appreciation; a question; waaagh (a mixed bag post)

Hi! I just thought I'd drop a post to say that this subreddit is some of the most fun I've ever had on reddit! I like how everyone just tells it like it is about meghan on here! There's no pussyfooting around on how odious she is and how she represents all things hateful and wretched, avaricious, selfish, self-gratifying and narcissistic. I like how people don't sugarcoat the truth about her on here

I even like the rare few times that there have been some small misunderstandings on this subreddit- because we actively listen to each other but different senses of humor mean that we sometimes don't quite get each other but it also implies that it's not a provincial opinion to dislike meg, a diverse slice of humanity inhabits this subreddit and collectively abhors this woman and that's part of what makes this subreddit authentic.

Anyways, the question- if you've posted/commented on this subreddit and feel like a sugar has replied to your comment, what do you do? Do you reply back, or ignore them? I think I'm going to ignore, can't even be bothered to downvote

Finally, I thought I would share something I saw, this is not mine and credit is to grits-gal-raised-in-the-south. I finally understand why folks on here keep saying waaagh!!

u/aloha-cowboy — 12 hours ago

Jack Royston Newsweek - Meghan Dips on TikTok

Princess Kate’s Star Visit Comes as Meghan Markle Dips on TikTok - Newsweek (archived)

https://preview.redd.it/rme8cddsug2h1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=80736443f6539574d3d264212510ad182ac1c147

I know it is annoying those in media still compare Catherine with Meghan. I would agree with those who say it is lazy clickbait journalism.

But I thought it interesting enough. As we recently saw that Neil Sean say the palace are concerned about the Wales's ability to connect with Gen Z. Gen Z (ages 13-24) approximately make up 60% of TikTok users. Also, the largest age groups on the platform are those aged 25-34 and 18-24.

Royston argues the Princess of Wales public appearances (Italy) received stronger and more positive attention online than Meghan Markle’s recent media efforts, particularly on TikTok. The piece sees this as a part of a broader trend in which the Princess of Wales generates steadier public goodwill and engagement, whereas Sussex-related campaigns and exclusives no longer dominate conversation in the way they once did. Even crucially the negative interest is dipping.

Earlier period (2023): Meghan and Harry content was heavily discussed on TikTok, but much of it was negative. Even so, the posts were getting huge engagement numbers (likes, discussion, shares).

Now: Engagement has fallen not only for supportive content, but also for critical content.

https://preview.redd.it/0ohihmlj6h2h1.png?width=767&format=png&auto=webp&s=5c929a509d4e0fdd948f2eb959a58b57f1c58133

Royston notes, it coincided with a significant dip in Australian traffic on Meghan's As Ever online shop.

reddit.com
u/Feisty_Energy_107 — 15 hours ago

Talk TV and Kinsey: Is Starmer using Harry to attack the monarchy?

ROYAL SCOOP: Starmer With Prince Harry’s Help Wants To BRING DOWN Monarchy?

Talk TV and Kinsey discuss the Geneva trip and that she stopped by Britain on the way back and forth to Geneva. They also discuss her posting her kids photo on social media and then railing against it.

Kinsey says harry has a relationship with the Starmer govt. She wonders if Starmer wants to bring the monarchy down using harry. They talk about Yvette Cooper briefing Prince harry. They bring in an ex-government minister Steve Baker. He says it is very extraordinary for govt ministers to interact with junior members of the Royal family. They will work with the King and maybe the Prince of Wales. He also says the monarch can make good speecehs-only if govt ministers clear it. The monarchy cannot interfere in day to day events and politics. But harry to interfere and also seemingly with the support of one party could get dangerous for the monarchy. Kinsey says they are willing to do anything to get security.

Personally, I think the Starmer govt is in trouble and so is using Harry to divert attention away from their troubles. Just like they went after Andrew-deserved-to get attention away from mandelson-who ironically was the guy who enabled Andrew. But it does make wonder the govt's encouragement to a rebel royal to blur the lines of what is acceptable for a royal to behave in public without consequences.

u/alreadydoneit01 — 16 hours ago

Does Harry have hobbies? Anything that isn't related to military or men's nipples? Something that he did on weekly or monthly basis not just occasionally like polo? Or a favorite club (football or not)? For someone growing up very rich (literally Queen's grandson) why didn't he have one?

I read spare. I didnt find anything that screamed passion there.

u/LocksmithFar9486 — 19 hours ago

The Duchess of Edinburgh in Geneva two days after harkles bus stop ‘speech’. Poor old Rachel, she really does set herself up to be laughed at in comparison to the real royals. Look Rachel, Sophie spoke to delegates INSIDE the building and was there in an official capacity - another win for you?

https://archive.ph/cdrEK

The Duchess of Edinburgh made an appearance at the World Health Assembly in Geneva on Tuesday, delivering an appeal for global action on avoidable sight loss.

Speaking in her capacity as Global Ambassador for the International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness, Sophie, 61, addressed health ministers, diplomats and international health leaders about the scale of the crisis.

More than one billion people worldwide are affected by preventable or treatable vision impairment, she told delegates.

The duchess emphasised this was "not through any lack of solutions, but through a lack of sustained, prioritised action."

And look, a woman who does not need to drape herself over men to get headlines.

https://preview.redd.it/xg8gj94xvf2h1.png?width=2048&format=png&auto=webp&s=be90886e75abc1462bc79961632eb9bf30cf47cc

reddit.com
u/Harry-Ripey — 19 hours ago

Maureen Callahan and Rob Schutter: Markle travelled to Geneva alone without Harry, because she wanted the spotlight all to herself.

Meghan Markle Traveled Without Harry Behind Because she Reportedly Wanted the Spotlight for Herself

Markle apparently did not want harry to fly to Geneva. The WHO paid for her flight and hotel there. Meghan put her foot down as she wanted it to be her moment -LOL.

Apparently Markle sees these events as her turn to step onto the world stage. She wants the optics to be about her. Apparently, she believes she is more powerful and can make more money without Harry-LOL. She believes Harry is the problem, the loss leader and not her!!

u/alreadydoneit01 — 1 day ago

Harry apparently “doesn’t want to be special”!

Ok I am not sure I am following the thought process of this writer. But apparently the latest rounds of smushed faced Harry, indicates he doesn’t want to be special.

I think the writer has it backwards. I think Harry wants to be very special but he just is unable to understand boundaries and behavioral expectations.

What do you think of this article?

u/SeaWorn — 1 day ago

Tom Sykes on the Anniversary Video and The Anniversary Candle of Desperation

Basically, all Tom's flabbers are gasted. He is amused, bemused and mad. He talks about the Olive Garden kitchen, the anniversary video, the photos and the candles. I think it is amusing as can be! Check it out!

youtube.com
u/Finnegan-05 — 1 day ago

MeGain’s Villain Origin Story

I hate to admit this, but our Saint and I have something in common. Something about our pasts. And it kills me a little. Similar situations led us down very different paths. But I know, at least in part, how she got where she is. You see, MeGain and I both spent our formative years in a weird sphere I like to call “rich people adjacent”.

We were both raised in families that were, by normal standards, very well off. Not only were all of our needs met, but around 80% of our wants were met as well. It was a life that the majority of people would be thrilled to achieve.

But the area where I lived, much like MeGain’s early world, was decidedly not average. It was a wealthy enclave of oil, tech and real estate money. My parents moved us there when I was 12 because it was the best school district in our area. My dad wasn’t a millionaire. But he had a good job with enough pay and savings to make it happen.

When we moved, we downsized. Our new house was much smaller. My parents cars were unimpressive. Family vacations came to an abrupt end. But it was worth it to my parents, because I was getting a much better education. Much as Thomas Markle would spend his hard earned money to give MeGain an excellent education.

There was one unexpected side effect for me. I spent my formative years feeling poor when I was very much not poor at all. Not even close. My dad had a good salary. My mom didn’t have to work. I wore nice clothes and did fun activities and had everything I needed. Going to college one day was a given. And never once did the matter of how it might be paid for cross my mind. That should tell you a good deal about my reality.

But when you are an adolescent, you are hyper-aware of your peers, not the real world. And for someone like MeGain, for whom optics are everything, this must have been ten times worse.

And this is where I feel like I know a little of MeGain’s villain origin story.

Because my family was not super rich, I was not like many of my classmates. They lived in huge homes. Their parents sent them to the mall with hundreds of dollars to spend. I spent spring break in my room reading books. They went skiing or laid on a beach.

There were social divisions at school, too. No surprise there.

At the top were the kids of billionaires and storied families. At the bottom? Kids with enough money to join in but not enough to keep up. Kids who had plenty of money, but it was “new money”, which isn’t as good. Kids who were Jewish or Asian or came from out of state. I had a friend whose only crime was, quite literally, having been born in Michigan.

MeGain attended a nice private school. And I know she enjoyed driving through the wealthy, mansion saturated neighborhoods of the Los Angeles area, probably wondering how they lived inside. I can’t totally blame her for rubbing shoulders with people who had it all and then dreaming that someday she could do the same. Because when I was 12, 13, 14 years old, I was doing that too.

I wonder sometimes where MeGain stood in her school’s social hierarchy. I just tried to keep my head down, but that’s certainly never been her way. My guess is that she took a “fake it till you make it” approach when she needed to fit in.

In adolescent social circles, no matter what your financial status, supreme self-confidence and swagger go a long way. Bonus if it involves being a mean girl. And our Saint is nothing if not self-assured in the worst way possible.

At some point though, our paths diverged. As I moved into high school, I began to see that money did not actually resolve all of life’s problems.

At my high school, eating disorders and deaths due to underage drinking were rampant. Academic pressures led many of my classmates to develop what I now recognize as serious mental health disorders. If you were gay, you did not come out. There was exactly one African American kid. His life was difficult in ways that I will never experience or even fully understand.

In the community, dysfunction was everywhere. Nasty divorces. Drug addiction. Negligent parenting that would have meant state intervention for poorer families. There were a lot of domestic violence situations and untreated mental health issues. Sometimes those things left people dead.

It must have been the same in MeGain’s world. Humans are humans, no matter the size of their bank account. She must have seen things, heard stories, experienced pressures first hand.

By the time I finished high school, I was ready to blow that popsicle stand. And I stepped into the real world, where I met people who had experienced real struggles and overcome far more serious hardships. Mansions were nice, but they were just wrapping on a box. And the contents of that box could vary wildly.

And as I went into college and then into the working world, I encountered people who had wildly different life experiences from my own. I realized I had never been poor. I was, by any measure, very spoiled and extremely privileged. MeGain never got the memo.

Or perhaps it is more accurate to say that she got the memo, but she didn’t know how to read it. Because MeGain is a narcissist and a user. She can’t do things like empathy or self reflection. She can’t even understand cause and effect.

So when she finally got what she dreamed of, she decided that wasn’t enough either. There’s always someone who has it better, and she needs it to be hers.

So now here she is, posting endless Instagram shots of her seeming idyllic world. Complaining about how mistreated she is, how miserable her life has been while surrounded by people with real problems.

But at the same time reminding everyone that she has a mansion. With a prince for a husband and two faceless children. With a rotting bridge, a dated facade and hanging pots that are straight out of a 90s catalog. It’s all MeGain’s adolescent dream come to life.

So that’s my theory of how a malignant narcissist turns into a global supervillain, obsessed with wealth, optics and getting ahead. Thank you for coming to my TedTalk.

u/Glittering_Texas — 1 day ago

Like a Streetwalker on a Hypocritical Censorship Crusade

Lauren the Insider interviews a doctor within this video, one whom packs a background directly involved with children and our online community, but Ms. Farrow begins with the recent photo-bombing by Prince Harry's wife, pointing out that she was attempting to push down the negative press surrounding her trip to Geneva.

She mentions that it was also a further attempt to become relevant once again, but that it basically came off like a used piece of plastic wrap clinging for dear life to fine china, when it was intended to remind all that she was once near the royals.

To drive her point home, Ms. Farrow shows photographs of the Prince and Princess of Wales' wedding, highlighting the stark difference in poise and conduct compared with that of Prince Harry and his wife.

Ms. Farrow quickly moves on to the failed Geneva venture, mentioning that after having put on a black suit, Prince Harry's wife did as usual and pretended to be one whom she was not, in order to push a censorship crusade, but that she could not successfully do so, being a low-grade actress tripping over her own hypocrisy in the process, as she allegedly recited a plagiarized speech written by someone else, proving once again that she was the wrong person for the role.

Basically pulling an Epstein, she hides behind philanthropy and charity, falsely believing that such will protect her from being fairly critiqued, as she attempts to rebrand herself countless times, Ms. Farrow posits; this time via behaving like a streetwalker wearing too much make-up in the middle of the day at a bus stop, attempting to garner attention from the few passersby, in my opinion.

Ms. Farrow does not believe for one second that Prince Harry and his wife care at all about children being online, because their own children are used by them online for attention and almost daily. I agree that such would be a fair and logical assessment.

Her perspective is that their censorship crusade precisely echoes what the Labour Party have been doing and continue to do, via the online safety bill, and that such is their only true motive.

Forty-three (43) too many deaths last year within the U.K., in comparison to the 87,000 annually born into households of sexual harm, leads Ms. Farrow to believe that Prince Harry and his wife are nothing but frauds, when it comes to prioritizing the protection of children.

Ms. Farrow points out that neither of them are willing to get into the weeds, so to speak, stepping up to help charities which deal with the taboos of society, such as the Prince and Princess of Wales do with addiction and homelessness.

Her experience heading up a charity in the past, combined with her professional background has led Ms. Farrow to become personally aware that most celebrities involve themselves with charities, for no other reason than to increase positive press, and that many of those celebrities have even gone so far as to grossly refer to the unfortunate children as, "Children on the scratch."

It is at this point, when Ms. Farrow introduces Dr. Alison McClymont, a previous guest upon her channel.

Dr. McClymont possesses close to one decade experience directly relevant to detrimental online behaviors and children.

https://www.dralisonmcclymont.com/

They share an interesting, back and forth dialogue with one another, for approximately ten minutes, commencing shortly after the 7:00 minute timestamp.

It would be fair to form the opinion that the nice doctor believes Ms. Markle was not qualified to speak upon the matter over in Geneva, for starters..., just as she also knew Prince Harry was not qualified to speak at a previous engagement.

Not long after the 16:30 time stamp, Ms. Farrow begins discussing what many refer to as "Project Thaw," and she highlights a few things having recently taken place on Youtube Channels and Mainstream Media, relevant to all from her perspective.

While I realize that Ms. Farrow has received numerous requests to lengthen her videos, I believe that this one could have/should have been condensed; however, I still recommend it.

youtube.com
u/DeepSouthSinner — 1 day ago

Megs is really not going to like this week's People cover

After all Megs did to try to make herself relevant, this has to be making her meltdown.

u/Foggyswamp74 — 1 day ago

She Wants You to Move On - Don’t Do Her Any Favours (Resist the Urge!!!)

Isn’t it strange, and WEIRD, to see someone making such a fuss over an eight-year wedding anniversary? It’s not exactly a milestone. Unless, of course, every day in that household feels like a battle for survival and they’re genuinely impressed they’ve managed to endure eight years of… whatever that life is.

Or maybe the sudden fanfare has something to do with the fact that the world couldn’t stop talking about P&PoW’s 15th milestone anniversary, and someone wanted a little piece of that spotlight too? (Are we even surprised haha)

But let’s be honest: the reason for this dramatic anniversary celebration is simple. She desperately wants you to forget her long list of painfully embarrassing non-achievements this year (don’t even get me started on the previous years 😂). She’d much rather you focus on her curated love story, sudden wealth, and over the top public displays of affection than all the cringe-worthy, toe-curling disasters that have been piling up behind her.

So what exactly is she hoping you’ll forget and/or ignore? Allow me to present the Top 10 Failures of Mrs Mischief in 2026 (and we’re only halfway through).

  1. That bizarre, crinkled, tone-deaf “humanitarian” trip to Jordan (which she somehow managed to Markle an entire region with).
  2. The business-and-pleasure disaster trip to Australia, where she (and him) delivered yet another round of “me, me, me” speeches, complete with Harry as a last-minute replacement because Deepak Chopra was busy issuing statements about Epstein. And despite all the hype, they couldn’t even sell out their events. Total flop.
  3. The humiliating fact that barely anyone bothered to show up to see them in Australia or Switzerland.
  4. And of course, the never-ending carousel of Mr Mischief’s lawsuits, the ones he’s filing and the ones being fired straight back at him.
  5. The toe-curling, secondhand-embarrassment messages of him drinking under a table and cuddling on a couch with Daily Mail journalists.
  6. Sentebale suing him for defamation.
  7. Invictus finances finally being exposed and questioned, and people starting to realise where those million-dollar donations actually go.
  8. The Australian government pulling support from InGrifters.

Her lecturing the world about online safety for children while simultaneously merching her kids whenever it suits the brand. own kids whenever it suits the brand.
10. having dinner with a Finnish politician who has publicly referred to Middle Eastern people as “monkeys” and “desert monkeys,” called Somalis “weeds,” called Nigerians the N word, and said “we Nazis don’t really like Hebrew names.”

Quite a choice of dinner companion for someone who claims to have a degree in International Relations.

It is genuinely shocking that a woman in her late 40s, who loudly advertises her global awareness, happily wears labels boycotted by the very regions she claims to champion and then grins through selfies with controversial figures—despite being constitutionally irrelevant and fully capable of simply saying no.

Remember she isn’t SILENCED anymore!

But hey, she’d much rather you remember the grand St George’s Chapel spectacle… while also insisting on Oprah that they secretly got married three days earlier. Totally logical. Totally consistent. Not at all contradictory.

What’s truly alarming is the sheer amount of “private life” we’ve been shown, all conveniently trotted out whenever a negative headline needs burying.

Honestly! It is sad (though he really walked into this with eyes wide open) that Harry was far more private and protected when he was a working royal. Now every move he makes (including juggling some balls) inside his own home ends up broadcast to the world.

But sure, let’s have another lecture from her about “the dangers of social media”… delivered to an audience of ten.

The irony really does write itself.

reddit.com
u/Independent_Swan902 — 1 day ago