UPDATED: YOU CAN HEAR THE BOOS: (It's from X, only place I've found it):

https://x.com/premrugby/status/2108667464209006919

UPDATE #2: Harold's arrival. Note the SeCurITAY:
https://x.com/premrugby/status/2108643461222003095

From the Express:

https://preview.redd.it/pe5ct73gaiuh1.png?width=590&format=png&auto=webp&s=fa2eb46123a428cca457b9ce85b9b9556132d807

Prince Harry stepped out this evening to watch a rugby union match. The Duke of Sussex made a low-key appearance at Welford Road this evening, to watch Leicester Tigers clash with Gloucester. However, not all fans appeared happy to see the royal among other members of the public, as he was greeted with boos by some of the fans in the stands after he was shown on the big screen. Harry was papped taking his seat with a bear in his hand. His appearance comes shortly after he moved back to Britain with his family. And the paps JUST happened to be there. Gonna regret that, Harold.

TNT Sports made mention of awkward reception in their live blog. They wrote: "There were boos inside Welford Road as Prince Harry was shown on the big screen. No the boos weren’t for Ugo Monye as the TNT pundits joked."

Archive: https://archive.ph/HUElu

Now, for the Hello version:

https://preview.redd.it/pb6j547xaiuh1.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=b3d2d4a37299b02b275a6a0bbf6c57e85687cd9f

Prince Harry had a guys' night out on Friday evening. The Duke of Sussex attended the rugby match between Leicester Tigers and Gloucester Rugby at Mattioli Woods Welford Road Stadium in Leicester.

King Charles' younger son was dressed down, wearing blue jeans and a black puffer jacket, for the match, where he was photographed in the stands with a drink, seemingly a beer, in hand. 

While his older brother, Prince William, is an avid football fan, the Duke prefers rugby. A source has told HELLO!: "For Harry it's all about rugby over football." Oh Harold, PUH-LEEZ. William and Catherine are both rugby fans, and both Prince George and Princess Charlotte play as well. Harold, you're no Mike Tindall and you never will be!!!

Harry previously served as patron of the Rugby Football Union and Rugby Football League, roles his sister-in-law, the Princess of Wales*, has since taken over. The Duke relinquished the patronages, along with others, in 2021 after* he and Meghan confirmed to the late Queen Elizabeth that they would not return as working members of the royal family. 

While it's unclear who the Duke was supporting on Friday, there is one team the dad of two would like to have his children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, get behind.

"Harry says Archie and Lilli support Northampton and he’s looking forward to the day that he can take them to a match once his security situation is sorted. He says it's one hurdle at a time," a source told HELLO!. SE-CUR-I-TAY is his excuse for being a lousy parent and not taking his kids anywhere.

Harry's outing on Friday night came just a few days after his wife Meghan was spotted in London, marking her first public sighting in the British capital since returning to the UK in late August. The Duchess of Sussex was seen on Wednesday at Claridge's hotel with Nobel Peace Prize laureate Malala Yousafzai.

"None of this is low-key. And this is why I think this whole move is quite extraordinary," ***HELLO!'*s Royal Editor Emily Nash remarked on HELLO!'s A Right Royal podcast. "Lest we forget, back in June, when Harry came back to the UK, he said it wasn't safe for him to bring his wife and children to the capital. So they did come to the UK and they stayed outside of London. What has changed to make Meghan come back?" 

"She's there in central London and it's one thing to be discreetly spotted at the table. But then she was photographed coming out in some very elegant clothing with Malala. It may not be her responsibility at all that that has happened, but what's changed? They must be confident that they are either having or about to have some better security, perhaps? Intriguingly, it seems to deviate from what we were told just a couple of months back."

https://preview.redd.it/mz2oei0nciuh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=24cf26fa431c17f1c6964d9d60f533ca6c8a7a11

Hello archive: https://archive.ph/iALP1

Mirror version:

Prince Harry was seen in the stands watching a rugby game with a beer this evening - and received a mixed reception from the crowd. The Duke of Sussex appeared in a relaxed mood watching Leicester Tigers as they faced Gloucester at Welford Road, despite some boos ringing out from fans when he was spotted.

As Harry was shown on the big screen taking his seat with a beer in hand, there were some jeers from the crowd

https://preview.redd.it/pkp1wdt3ciuh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=df08a4b55dffd20094bda0a83993e27698ce83f0

I don't know who this guy is, but damn, his face says it all.

https://preview.redd.it/5ieokbs7ciuh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=857eeaafed600ca0ba3cce20dcc63ab73ffa7c74

https://preview.redd.it/4k8agvfeciuh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=75722a75e2f5b18a03abef24811c48976cd524b4

Mirror archive: https://archive.ph/EpIc9

…(because Meghan doesn’t mention Christmas in her A sewer promotions).

Headline in the Daily Mail unarchived (apologies, archiving isn’t working for me right now).

https://preview.redd.it/acl4t7u2liuh1.jpg?width=1509&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=361a165a38fed3f6845bab86d454bba132c4327e

The article’s big on filler and low on information - salient paragraphs extracted.

https://preview.redd.it/i079xhn4liuh1.jpg?width=1571&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a4a3d7baa0782609949a9f2aa1c3091fda7785b7

https://preview.redd.it/nk4t10c7liuh1.jpg?width=1557&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a8a9604560d91301465f9f3ad6d12ae5d63a1130

Is this a pre-emptive strike by Sussexes to avoid the possible shameful news that they haven’t been invited to the King’s Christmas lunch at Buckingham Palace, for the wider Windsor family such as the Earl of Snowdon (Princess Margaret’s son) and James Ogilvy (Princess Alexandra of Kent’s son) (going by 2025’s guest list) -never mind the more intimate gathering at Sandringham, where the Royal Family attend St Mary Magdalene Church on Christmas Day (does anyone remember scarfgate?).

Or do they really want to spend Christmas at Olive Garden Montecito? The article speculates that they could spend time with Doria or other friends.

So much for Harry wanting his children to meet their cousins.

I would never make fun of the fact that Harry and Claw make bad decisions, because I have the same problem myself. But their case is truly worthy of study in psychiatry schools; after all, you might make one bad decision, or two or three... but making bad decisions every single week for over six years? That’s a lot of weeks, isn't it? 😁

MARKLE WILL SAY SORRY BUT FIRST THIS LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiQRLqgoblw

https://preview.redd.it/iu0glk5mziuh1.png?width=1217&format=png&auto=webp&s=1a4dc6ce20d58ad11fb88a7b6bad8f2512d0b885

Sean has spent many years in the scene where Claw moves. Many years. So he knows that Claw would eat one of her chocolates before actually apologizing.

Sean knows the Harkles aren't going to apologize, and he has consistently said so for a long time. The Harkles will do what they always do: if you feel offended, it's your fault.

That didn't happen.

And if it did, it wasn't that bad.

And if it was, that's not a big deal.

And if it is, that's not my fault.

And if it was, I didn't mean it.

And if I did, you deserved it.

https://preview.redd.it/y2pisvle1juh1.png?width=420&format=png&auto=webp&s=14b554509c232c745f866e5373aa2e23ec4de9a2

Claw—and Harry, too—fall into that category. They are always the victims; they are always the ones who have been wronged. They always have to be the ones receiving support because everyone is attacking them.

That makes what Ari Emanuel said—that he’s happy Claw is no longer his problem—even funnier. Because let’s be clear about one thing: Emanuel is a narcissist, and he works with narcissists all day long (because that’s what an agency like WME is: a club for narcissists).

If someone like him can't stand Claw anymore, whose fault is it?

...

...

...

Well, obviously... Ari Emanuel's!

Claw is deeply hurt by what Emanuel said.

Sean says it must be really difficult working for the Harkles. Claw is rude to the staff in ways that are truly draining, and Harry is exhausting because he believes—just like Claw—that the world MUST revolve around them.

You might scoff at this, but it is a fact that King Charles III hasn't given up hope that Harry will mature. Yet, after those 47 minutes at Highgrove, the only impression left on him was that he won't be alive for the hundred years it will take Harry to grow up. Because, looking at what happened with that masterclass, Harry definitely hasn't learned a thing.

The most annoying thing about all this is the fact that Harry thinks he is the only one who lost a loved one as a child.

I was five years old when my first grandmother died; I remember everything about that day—everything. My Aunt Leontina, who is nearly 100 years old, lost a daughter in an accident 60 years ago, and she has carried that grief with her every single day since. People here—yesterday and on other occasions—have spoken about the pain of losing a parent during childhood. Sean himself often thinks of his parents. Do any of us want to hear advice from a guy who spent 20 years with his brain cells fried from everything he smoked, consumed, and drank?

And when we consider Harry’s atrocious behavior on the very day—and at almost the exact time—the Queen passed away—the way he shouted at his father and saw fit to make demands—does Harry really have the audacity to believe he can teach anyone how to cope with something?

That attitude of Harry’s really bothers Sean. Because everything is always about Harry. He was the one who suffered through Diana’s death—not his aunts Sarah and Jane, not his brother William. Only him.

The thing is, if you compare the current video with the previous ones, Harry is giving exactly the same speech. And Sean doesn't get that: didn't he see that this was precisely the moment to turn the narrative around?

https://preview.redd.it/0z702vt95juh1.png?width=1110&format=png&auto=webp&s=17f3e1a20f016c5020cc869ff4c73c1328cb12ad

Harry and Claw also believe they have been wronged. And they have no intention of changing that narrative.

Sean has made two things clear in many videos: 1) the Harkles want the BRF to apologize to them, and 2) Sean is skeptical of much of what appears in the newspapers—having worked for several himself, he can smell when a published story doesn't quite add up.

The other day, Sean was making fun of the *Express*—which is in crisis—for resorting to publishing a story about how Claw might want to apologize. Since no one is willing to name names regarding that, it’s just "gossip."

That said, the Harkles constantly need to shift the focus with nonsense like those articles. Because Sean—who knows full well who took the pub photos—said the very day they came out that the deal only covered their arrival at the pub... not them leaving together. That image was supposed to dispel the notion that their marriage is in crisis, but the fact is that Harry looked uncomfortable and like he was being forced to do it.

https://preview.redd.it/jley8k707juh1.png?width=554&format=png&auto=webp&s=d3ebc26c1883c556161e02b64210000bd91b91ca

Well, now *People* magazine has published an article about it. And Sean says this one is actually credible, because *People* has a direct line to the Harkles, so it’s obvious that the source was the Harkles themselves.

https://preview.redd.it/kvee5qzm7juh1.png?width=388&format=png&auto=webp&s=145bf02d409616efc626fa1e4aa3530c33c823ec

https://people.com/prince-harry-meghan-markle-not-planning-apology-prince-william-kate-middleton-source-exclusive-12163162

Basically, that article says it’s nonsense for the Harkles to be planning an apology.

And according to an excellent source of Sean’s, the thing is—no, no, no—there will never be an apology from the Harkles until someone from the BRF publicly comes to Claw’s defense, admitting how hard things were for her during her time in the UK and confirming that everything she said in the Oprah interview was true.

Harry, on the other hand, has no plans to apologize either. He wants to show the world that he has changed—that both he and Claw have changed—through sheer hard work, doing good, and moving forward.

...

...

...

https://preview.redd.it/rmusojgv8juh1.png?width=630&format=png&auto=webp&s=ab5239a04931ca2b8937965369154ceeea5bbc59

That said, Sean isn't claiming the *Express* article was made up; it came from somewhere. The fact that *People* magazine dismissed it doesn't change the fact that the *Express* didn't just invent the story.

Sean says he leans toward *People*'s version of events, because it’s a fact that the Harkles will never apologize until *they*—the victims—receive an apology. Sean must be bored with this, seeing as he’s been... um, repeating the same thing for nearly three years now. Long live the evolution of the Harkles!

https://preview.redd.it/2lc6kk1p9juh1.png?width=700&format=png&auto=webp&s=8cb7865092b042eabe7783b68f99e26069212ee9

HARRY'S MELTDOWN INSISTING ON THIS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93g1NP81KGI

Sean has been consistent in this regard as well.

Harry is not mentally well. That doesn't mean he doesn't try to manipulate people and the like, but he isn't mentally well. He crumbles under the slightest pressure. And that happens because he has a low tolerance for frustration, which is a problem.

And Harry's obsession with talking yet again about how much he has suffered is unhealthy.

Right now, Harry is very frustrated because nothing has gone the way he wanted. Everything has gone wrong.

Things started off on the wrong foot the moment Harry returned to the UK. After all, the press was obviously tipped off—Harry had security—and now that they are living rent-free in a heavily guarded mansion, they have once again resorted to using paparazzi to take "spontaneous" photos; naturally, the paparazzi now want credit because they want to sell the pictures.

But none of that is benefiting Harry. Not even the fact that his uncle Spencer is exploiting his mother, Diana. The funny thing is that Spencer is reaping more benefits from it than Harry himself.

Even when Spencer has lied, and even fired shots at Anne. Now, it’s not unusual for Princess Anne to make a biting remark, but for Spencer to hold a grudge over it is... it’s just so damn stupid!

In one passage of his book, Spencer described the days leading up to Charles and Diana's wedding in 1981, including a formal meal held at Buckingham Palace in the days prior.  Spencer recalled how, to his "alarm", he was sat next to the Princess Royal and asked her how her daughter Zara Tindall's christening went. He alleged that Anne gave a "withering" response that made him feel "small", writing: "I expected her to run away with the happy topic of her baby Zara's baptism. "But instead, she stopped, looked at me witheringly, and asked, 'Tell me, how's a christening supposed to go?'"

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Take Mike Tindall, for example. In 2011, by which time he was already Anne's son-in-law, he captained the England rugby team in a match against Scotland—a nation whose rugby union has had Anne as its patron since 1986. Mike greeted the Rugby Union officials before receiving the trophy from his mother-in-law. Tindall believes that Princess Anne was clearly unimpressed with his behavior and urged him to speed up his victory lap. He added: "She was like, 'Move on, Michael.' I was like, 'Debrief over lunch tomorrow?' and she said, 'Move on, Michael.'"

https://preview.redd.it/ga7nhwj1fjuh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=3e1d8b2f67de107816df74b2ca77fc69a8cb16a0

Sean says Spencer is in desperation mode, looking for a reaction. From Anne?

https://preview.redd.it/bha3qi2egjuh1.png?width=512&format=png&auto=webp&s=249decadb724c30810497a3091ab0bbec8cc6684

Sean says it’s a terrible idea to go up against her. And I believe him, because she’s the type who shoots straight for the brain—she doesn’t leave anyone wounded.

Harry is reportedly preparing to become a professional speaker.

https://preview.redd.it/k9tjgl21hjuh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=a3012ffbd59f5deba38e42008a62f9c2256eb214

The thing is, Harry is trying to raise the cash to pay what he owes the *Daily Mail*. Sean says it’s not a matter of him staying quiet; rather, the exact amount they have to pay will be revealed on October 22. From what Sean says, it looks like the figure will exceed 25 million, so they are currently looking into the payment structure and the timing of the settlement. Sean says he has this information from a very reliable source.

That said, as always, Harry has of course made headlines... for the wrong reason.

https://preview.redd.it/tu57d0bmhjuh1.png?width=1500&format=png&auto=webp&s=6d1cb80c55f00b5e76b3a94c90451c7b74b198cf

Exactly—his head. Not what’s inside—we know it’s empty in there—but the fact that it looks like he has hair. That wasn't visible when Claw was opening that basket of products and Harry was standing there barefoot, wearing an old T-shirt and shorts.

https://preview.redd.it/283suj08ijuh1.png?width=1022&format=png&auto=webp&s=46a4603f21ab441fb13cdc93c166a85c40d0bb5f

Sean has been told that Harry is very sensitive about that situation—specifically, how his hair looks in photos. That is why it is quite curious that Harry appears with more hair in the MasterClass promotional photo.

https://preview.redd.it/0lmw91yjijuh1.png?width=480&format=png&auto=webp&s=396b1a05236c4d1700e558791966232da50bc0f2

Sean says people have paid more attention to that than to what Harry said. It's because that's more fun 😁😁😁

MARKLE MYSTERY IN LONDON REVEALED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urnSETh7mRk

Claw never gives up. Claw strives to be constantly in the news—even for the wrong reasons.

And Sean is right: Claw might want to tell the difficult story of how she built As Ever from scratch—which is why you have to buy her wickless candles—but then she’s dining at a five-star hotel wearing £28,000 worth of clothes.

Sean says Claw dresses that way to get attention. Claw doesn't care whether it's good or bad, as long as people are talking about her.

https://preview.redd.it/4z4e9mz4kjuh1.png?width=829&format=png&auto=webp&s=ac2143d5710ce512f98ac0a0de22b71696340bc0

Was that thing from Ralph Lauren????

Sean says that Claw is not managing to sell its products.

That’s not the case with the Claridge. Sean says the afternoon tea is excellent—expensive, but excellent. Plus, they give you a gift bag, which Sean took with him since he hadn't paid for the tea himself 🤣🤣.

The honey at that hotel comes from various places across the UK, and the current manager is marketing-savvy.

Now for the inside scoop: the day after Claw visited the hotel, a full package of "As Ever" jams and products arrived. Sean is very clear about it: jams, candles, and bookmarks—that’s what arrived at the Claridge in Mayfair. He is very specific about this. "Someone" had sent it. Could it have been a gesture of thanks for the treatment received the day before? Sean doesn't rule that out, but the fact is that Claw wants to negotiate with Claridge's to get them to carry "As Ever" products.

For those who missed the scoop: look for yesterday's post. Sean said Claw wanted to get his jam onto the breakfast tables at those places.

https://preview.redd.it/ps27gl5wljuh1.png?width=615&format=png&auto=webp&s=ed7c4c9bad0798b30a35377adf0fb7b8dfc457ec

Mind you, Sean clearly says that isn't going to happen. His point is that Claw genuinely believes she is so incredibly special that the Claridge is dying to have "As Ever" jam in its catalog.

KING'S LETTER MEANT NOTHING- CALL ME DUCHESS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K50EO-SotW4

People ask, "Why isn't KC3 saying anything?"

KC3 has just stated clearly: the Harkles are private citizens.

Why don't people get the message?

Then again, Claw doesn't get the message either. For starters: she looked awful in front of the Claridge.

https://preview.redd.it/upx4v6canjuh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=7bdcbe9b54d409a6fa617a942b43352057c34d52

Sean thinks that outfit would have looked good on Kate. I think that outfit wouldn't suit anything that's alive. Not even zombies.

Neither Harry nor Claw has a clear role in their lives. But it’s all their own fault.

Well, the thing is, Kelly McKee Zajfen came to the UK to help Claw get in touch with certain people. That was her role.

https://preview.redd.it/i7fr9yg7pjuh1.png?width=1217&format=png&auto=webp&s=b751b595423ccad2f1bb623aaeddf4ed0ff572b7

But as Sean already mentioned, the Harkles are looking for someone to support them. This brings to mind the Sussex Survivors' Club in the UK.

And the club keeps gathering more and more members.

https://preview.redd.it/llnduj2wpjuh1.png?width=771&format=png&auto=webp&s=b2bb77b70a6baf23ce79f4c466058cb9c69a3497

The thing is, no matter how much the Harkles pay to have a British assistant, their bad reputation is too widely known.

Especially because that person would have to present marketing ideas to position the "Duchess."

Yes, Claw is using the title. Sean says the Claridge's staff was instructed to call her Duchess. Several people curtsied to her.

So, the person who works for her must know how to deal with someone of that caliber.

https://preview.redd.it/gl9wd6ltqjuh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=bc2978ab396f661b3ecc5092b3778d9206a41f0b

Sean makes it clear that this piece of gossip is well and truly confirmed, as it is a widely discussed topic—specifically within marketing and image agency circles. Sean has already said that the issue goes back to before the Harkles returned to the UK. In other words, nobody wants to work for Claw.

https://preview.redd.it/qsp2f0g4rjuh1.png?width=634&format=png&auto=webp&s=c34d74b5c5cc2dd8faa2c0f4fde0b2b9589f56b4

Be careful

A little more snark than in the Daily Mail...

So, like all of you, I was furious for a minute. Or less than 60 seconds, to be precise, when I saw DuchAss with Malala.

I’m not a fan of Malala, and I never will be. I have my reasons, and I’m not going to discuss them here. But I will never downplay what she went through as a young girl who simply wanted access to a basic education. What doesn’t sit well with me is the woman she has become, particularly her selective advocacy when it comes to women’s rights. But enough about a 28-year-old woman who apparently had no issues being photographed with the world’s No. 1 con artist/ Bully . Let’s talk about the con artist herself. 😂

I think Rachel has landed in the UK recently (not when they said she arrived), and now she wants to be SEEN. She wants people to know she’s there. And how does she decide to make her presence known? By meeting a 28-year-old woman who has RAVEC security.
I’m sure Markle tried reaching out to every celebrity and activist she could think of to arrange a photo op. She even leaked fake stories about meeting with celebs. And it looks like Yusufzai was the only one available to orchestrate this little pap walk and the obligatory forced hugs. 😂
Honestly, though, guys, let’s not make a bigger deal out of this pap walk than we need to. A woman’s gotta merch and feed her family! Don’t read too much into it.

Remember when Rachel was in the US? She was barely seen with A-listers or activists. Except the old Gloria Steinem. It’s not as if Malala has been living under a rock for the past six years and has never been in the US. So why this meeting, and why now?

And let’s be honest: when it comes to Rachel, these meetings with famous people never produce anything particularly useful or lasting. Remember her meeting with those Iranian women alongside Mandana Dayani? What came of that? NOTHING. Absolutely nothing that we’ve seen come to fruition.

Then there was her spectacularly underwhelming 40x40 initiative, where a bunch of celebrities and other notable people were roped into sharing the same recycled paragraph. And what happened after the initial publicity? Rachel didn’t exactly follow up with some grand, lasting legacy, did she? 😂

And remember the guests on her flop show WLM? Some of them barely promoted their own episodes more than once on their social media platforms. Imagine showing up for a show, getting paid to be there, pretending to be Markle’s friend and then seemingly moving on with your life as if the whole thing never happened. 💀

For Rachel, an exclusive headline in the tabloids and a few carefully curated photographs are the real prize. Anything beyond that is just a bonus.
A photo with a famous person gives her publicity. Publicity gives her headlines. Headlines give her content to parade around on her merch website.
It's a beautiful little cycle, really. 😂

And speaking of merch, have you noticed how she dines with famous people in famous restaurants but rarely seems interested in being photographed with ordinary plebes (even Kelly 3 Names) in some local pub? Funny, that. She needs to be seen out and about, wearing expensive clothes, dining at exclusive establishments, and hugging important people. Otherwise, how is she going to keep the Duchess of Merch enterprise going?

The more she goes out, the more photographs she gets. The more photographs she gets, the more opportunities she has to turn her outings into publicity and her outfits into merchandise. And the tabloids helpfully tell everyone exactly what she’s wearing and how much it costs. Except for the COLOUR OF UNDERWEAR SHE’S WEARING 🙄

At this point, the fashion breakdowns are practically doing the work for her. The tabloids are running out of things to say, so apparently, the price of her coat has become exclusive news. 😂

I can’t help wondering whether this sudden urge to strut around sweeping the streets of the UK has anything to do with Paris Fashion Week. Was she trying to remind everyone that she exists after not being invited?
Not that she was invited last year either, if memory serves. 💀

But hey, a woman can dream!

The bigger picture is that none of her projects or deals seems to have delivered the lasting results we were promised. The much-hyped initiatives fizzle out, the celebrity meetings generate headlines, and the publicity machine keeps churning.
So now we have another high-profile meeting, another round of photographs, another set of headlines, and another opportunity to tell us what an expensive outfit she wore.
And the prove-it game? That’s just the cherry on top.

Whether she wants to prove she’s in the UK, prove she still has famous friends, or prove she’s still relevant, the result is the same: more publicity, more photographs, and more opportunities to merch.
Rachel is 50 years old. A woman’s gotta hustle for her supper, after all. 😂

So, please, let’s not lose our minds over these planned pap walk. Let’s not mistake a photograph with a famous person for meaningful advocacy, or a celebrity meeting for an accomplishment.

Sometimes a photo op is just a photo op.
And sometimes, it’s a business model. 💅

PS: Also I remember her having lunch with Jason Knauf once and she called the paps 😂

The Claw segment starts 7 minutes in. Ari should hold a master class on saying EVERYTHING without saying anything at all. The pit is getting deeper by the day. Never have seen karma in action quite. this way, and I”m no spring chicken!

Greetings from Castle Goring, before we plunge in, let me begin with some observations.  With Meghan and Harry desperately trying to grab all the attention for themselves, there has been something at Battersea Park with Elton John and The King and the Executive Chairman of Apple, Tim Cook.  Isn’t it interesting how Sir Elton and The King are so chummy despite the Daily Mail lawsuit?  Also the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester were in Botswana.  They were brilliant.  They are older than I am and it shows how the late Queen’s first cousin can still do Royal duties very well while Meghan chases her Norma Desmond moments and Harry talks endlessly about how much he suffers.   Also, I gather that Claridges would like to put out a message via the bongo bongo drums that someone left with all the linens from a certain hotel room.  The towels and sheets are missing!

Lady C was asked about the alleged apology that the Daily Express reported.  The viewer was assuming the story was true.  Meghan already denied this via People Magazine so I will skip Lady C reading out this article.  Lady C thinks that Meghan planted this story to keep her and Harry on the front pages.  Lady C says the Royal Family totally understand what Harry and Meghan are doing. The Royal Family understand Harry and Meghan crave attention.  Lady C thinks Meghan planted this story for attention and to see what the public reaction would be.  The Royal Family understands that any apology would be self-serving and not genuine.  From what I can tell, Harry and Meghan have not received one positive comment.  And when they unleash their Squad on an innocent priest, and fail to denounce the Squad, it just shows you what you are dealing with. 

Lady C, they are so low.  Out for a photoshoot and uses Malala Yousafzai.  She is a Pakastani Nobel prize winner and Meghan wanted to show the world that she and Malala can have tea together.  It looked like Meghan was wearing half the linens missing from Clarridges.  Her trousers were trailing on the pavement.  She also has an affinity to push up her sleeves to her elbows and she doesn’t realize it misshapes the look of the garment.  Meghan had a tote bag that showed ladies wearing the Burka.  Does Meghan not understand there is a real problem for women in some Muslim countries where they do not want to wear the Burka, and here is Meghan promoting this?  This is not good messaging from Meghan.  Meghan is such a flagrant opportunist, she is actually dangerous, but people can see how flagrant she is.  Why is Meghan advertising a religion?  Both women got a lot of publicity and tomorrow they will be on to something else.

Lady C, is anyone else feeling nauseous from Harry’s latest comments?  Harry said, “Everything I do, everything I put my energy into, I hope my mother would be proud, trying to protect and continue her legacy.  What I didn’t realize is the work I am drawn to, is similar to the work she was drawn to.”  Excuse me?  I don’t recall Diana prostituting herself commercially. On the contrary.  Diana was adamant that people did not make money off her existence.  Anytime someone would do that, she would dump them.  The first thing that needs to be said is that Harry is fronting with a neuroscientist called Dr. Mary Francis O’Connor.  They did a grief management course via Masterclass.  Harry is capitalizing, exploiting, benefiting, selling himself and his grief experience to other people who are grief stricken.  You can be a member for ַ£10 per month.  I don’t know about you, but I think this is seedy and greedy.  Harry is capitalizing upon the death of his mother.  He is selling grief courses to the public.  I am dumbfounded that Harry would find it appropriate to exploit for commercial gain, the grief he endured.  There are organizations out there that don’t charge anything to help people cope with grief.  In my opinion this is low.  This is a man who is by his and his wife’s account, a multi…multi…multi-millionaire.  We don’t know if they are being truthful about this, but I am dumbfounded.  If Harry is an example of somebody who has built resilience through his grief, then I am a bar of soap.  Not only has Harry traduced his mother’s legacy, but Harry, Meghan and Charles Spencer have done more to destroy Diana’s legacy by not allowing sleeping dogs lie.  Recall the therapist told Harry to coat himself in his mother’s favorite scent because he had forgotten the sound of her voice and laugh.  And we know Meghan wore Diana’s perfume on their first date.  This is all grandstanding of the highest order.  Harry could not have forgotten what Diana sounds like.  All Harry needed to do was go to any recording of Diana to refresh his memory.  This is an offensive lie by Harry.  He goes on to lie even more by saying he was so depressed after Megxit and that he moved to Canada to get some space.  That is a lie.  As the Queen said, they took the dogs and weren’t coming back, and she was right.  Harry and Meghan had already made their plans to move to California to make money.  Harry then says he never cried after Diana died.  Harry said he didn’t cry for 15 years until he went to therapy.  The therapist did not connect Harry with his grief; the therapist connected him with his self-pity.  This is very insightful that Harry didn’t cry for 15 years – it tells me that he is emotionless and possibly did not really love his mother.  Harry is exploiting his mother to get a free pass for his and Meghan’s bad behavior.  Diana must be spinning in her grave.  And poor William.  The older son.  The brighter son.  He has enough dignity to leave his mother to rest in peace and not behave as a vulture.

Lady C, I believe Meghan has many forms of narcissism.  Malignant, Machiavellian, Somatic, Grandiose and Communal.  Communal narcissism is when a person uses philanthropy and charity to create a persona of goodness when it is nothing more than a mask whose goal is to garner praise and accolades.  Under the façade, the truth is the opposite.  According to Thomas Markle, Meghan was very helpful as a child.  She was polite and helpful.  And today, she has attached herself to that Pakistani woman.  She does anything she thinks will get her respect and glory.  Harry was trained to do this work and when he is not with Meghan, he does an okay job.  He is sort of a buffoon now, trying to be cheeky chappy, but it comes across as the idiocy of a middle-aged fool.  Meghan does philanthropy badly.  In Canada, Meghan learned that playing up to left wing causes would garner her praise from the Mulroney’s and Trudeau’s.  I wrote in my book how Meghan went to Rwanda and India and only cared about the pictures.  If Meghan possesses the traits of these types of narcissism, I am sure it is because she possesses them.

The rest of the video was about Prince Andrew.

Toodles Sinners!

HARRY BUSTED THE HIGHGROVE AGREEMENT VIA THIS MEGA LEAK

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaUO59zF1eE

Many people pointed out that Neil Sean had contradicted himself, as he had claimed Claw never wanted to return to the UK—yet now she is there.

The problem isn't Sean; it's Claw. Based on information from Montecito staff, Sean holds a firm belief that Claw has no desire to live in the UK. In fact, he predicted she wouldn't hesitate to stage a public appearance tied to the children's schooling or security. His insistence on this point stems from a very logical reason: Claw’s refusal to let Archie attend King Charles III’s coronation alongside Harry, citing the absurd excuse that it coincided with the boy's birthday.

https://preview.redd.it/5thgqzc0wxsh1.png?width=1264&format=png&auto=webp&s=b14ee06ed61db0a4656e36b2b9636d45bc5b8376

And Claw and Harry will have to deal with the fact that Archie will see—because he *will* see—photos of his cousins ​​there; [he’ll wonder] why he wasn’t there. That is inevitably going to happen very soon if Archie keeps attending a British school. And Sean asks: what explanation will they give? That Claw was making a lemon cake?

Sean says the Sussex children are a ticking time bomb.

Claw is angry because they’ve been—yes, almost a month—in the UK; it’s been over a month since the meeting at Highgrove, and KC3 is still ignoring them. In her anger, Claw does a lot of foolish things, the biggest being talking about that encounter at the event just to show off, without realizing that Martha Stewart would spill the beans. The agreement was "not to talk" about the matter, and Claw broke it. So, from the Palace's perspective, it’s absurd for her to be angry. But that’s typical of narcissists, isn't it?

https://preview.redd.it/tosl86oqxxsh1.png?width=921&format=png&auto=webp&s=69e754e177dc647b96251c5f24e94235aed91e22

Sean wonders if Claw has some sort of condition, because logically they could have kept a low profile, but Claw can't stand keeping a low profile.

Let’s get back to the subject Claw is most obsessed with: the photos.

Sean confirmed that photos were indeed taken—though not many—and made it clear that they featured Harry and the children; Claw was just in the way.

Claw doesn't understand why they haven't been published with a caption like "Grand Reconciliation."

Charles Spencer is another one who is going off the rails. Sean is scathing about Tina Brown: you weren't Diana's friend, because friendship cannot exist between journalism and fame—one is merely a useful tool for as long as one is needed. Yet there was Tina Brown—Diana's "friend"—with Spencer. And Spencer isn't staying silent.

Where do the two stories collide?

With the Diana documentary.

According to Sean’s source, when the Harkles were at Highgrove, King Charles III asked them about their intentions—since rumors had been circulating for a year that Harry wanted to make a documentary about his mother—and they apparently said no, that they had no skeletons in the closet, that they didn't plan to do anything, that they weren't going to do it, and so on.

Yet, not even a day later—remember, the Harkles spent just 47 minutes at Highgrove before heading to Althorp—Charles Spencer and his fourth wife were told about the Diana documentary that Harry *does* want to make.

And Charles Spencer said that Harry spoke about that documentary.

So, did the Harkles lie to KC3?

https://preview.redd.it/t6hhgv4pzxsh1.png?width=672&format=png&auto=webp&s=2b0b7f2ae7dc2a3873d4fee7c11fe5d3efdfb67a

Sean says it in a mocking tone, but the fact is, things couldn't have gone any other way. During the—I believe—two-hour journey between Highgrove and Althorp, it seems the Harkles changed their minds from "No, we’ll never make that documentary" to "Sure, we’d really love to do it."

Things are getting juicier 😈😈 because, as Sean has said, Harry hasn't managed to get anyone talking about Diana, but his uncle might be promoting the paperback edition of *Swan Song* next year—between June and August—with more revelations. In other words, Harry has... no, he doesn't have a year anymore; he has less than nine months to get that documentary ready and sold before August 31, 2027. Meanwhile, his uncle plans to keep slinging more mud at KC3. And Harry actually told that uncle about the documentary—only for the uncle to inadvertently expose the fact that Harry lied to his father. Yet again.

Sean—who has a very reliable source here 😉😉😉—says that this whole affair didn't go down well at Highgrove. It’s not that KC3 is worried about yet another documentary on Diana; there are hundreds of them. He is angry because Harry and Claw arrived at Highgrove claiming they were looking for a fresh start, a new chapter, or whatever you want to call it.

https://preview.redd.it/aey5i50k1ysh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=5db9bb633015fa1508f18443fee157cb608fd64d

And that is how the Highgrove agreement fell apart.

It was an agreement Camilla never believed the Harkles would actually honor. Staying silent, respecting the Royal Family, behaving themselves? That is why Camilla never left KC3 alone—something that really annoyed the Harkles, because Sean says that, for some reason, they wanted ten minutes alone with KC3. If the Harkles thought that in ten minutes KC3 would change the heir and make Harry the new Prince of Wales, they were sorely mistaken 🤭🤭🤭.

SUSSEX SECURITY DRAMA - POLICE NOW ADVISE THIS TO “PRIVATE CITS”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO6PsTiuUC4

Sean said that the issue that caused the Harkles to move to the UK wasn't Harry's visa. And it turned out he was right, because Harry was in NY without any issues.

Sean also said the problem wasn't money. And it seems that while they aren't Jeff Bezos, they don't shop at Walmart... yet 😈

Sean has been hinting—since he claims he cannot legally say more—that the matter involves a lawsuit filed against the Harkles by former employees. Some here have commented that this doesn't sound all that bad. However, reports that James Corden had been rude at a restaurant ended up undermining his standing in the U.S., and he, too, eventually returned to the UK. Ellen DeGeneres saw her show get cancelled. These are not good times to be rude to staff. Piecing together the gossip Sean has been doling out in dribs and drabs, he has hinted that the situation appears very ugly and that the Harkles intended to resolve it behind the scenes—which would explain that six-month stay.

But Sean has also made it clear that the fact is, we don't actually know why the Harkles returned to the UK. He has heard gossip, but the true reasons are known only to the Harkles and Markus Anderson.

Sean was already mocking the fact—more than a year ago—that Harry said he wanted his son to receive an English education, given that Harry himself was such a poor student and had complained that his own school days were miserable.

And the question is, what are the Harkles doing in the UK? Is Claw going to do some Christmas special in the Cotswolds? Because that would explain her horrible £130 Advent calendar.

Do I need a chocolate advent calendar? Ferrero Rocher

https://preview.redd.it/u4k8b2h25ysh1.png?width=348&format=png&auto=webp&s=8e9c55da560199e7841c4c664e39ab737cc09e19

https://preview.redd.it/ed2ikb0r5ysh1.png?width=320&format=png&auto=webp&s=c07780c1cdc0c7ee7af2286f2e65ceda44caf1b8

Ferrero Rocher, una expresion de buen gusto 🤭🤭🤭 If there are any Spaniards here, they'll understand. Anuncio Ferrero Rocher con Isabel Preysler (Una expresión de buen gusto)

£130 is excessively expensive for what Claw is offering. Especially since so many people deeply disliked the chocolate Claw had made; everyone said the packaging was nice, but the taste wasn't.

But the point is, Sean was right—it was only a matter of 3,2,1... before the Harkles cooked up some security issue involving the kids. Sean has made several videos mocking the fact that no paparazzi know what those children look like, since all we ever see is the backs of their heads.

What surprises Sean is that the press sided with the Harkles—it was good drama. Especially *Hello* magazine.

Sean made it clear yesterday that no one in the area or at the school found out about the matter—which is curious, given that a strange van was supposedly in the area for two hours.

That’s what Harry’s security team said... the same team that "tested" the school route in July. Smart folks—they’ve clearly never left the house in September.

https://preview.redd.it/jldgw02m7ysh1.png?width=465&format=png&auto=webp&s=8c8167fcc1982b44d24ffce56acb24db53406037

Sean says Harry should ask himself just how smart his security team is. Well, they surely have a couple more brain cells than Harry does. They actually have a job 🤣🤣🤣

The paparazzi story has been falling apart. Sean contacted not only the school but also the Gloucester police—with whom he has a very good relationship and who cover that specific area—to find out what happened. And no, there is no investigation; they just took a look into it. And it seems—please let this be true 😁😁—it seems the police told Harry to be more careful, do they want security? Then don't post things on social media. Especially considering there are many people in the area who are far more famous and haven't had issues with their children.

In other words, it seems the police have no intention of playing along. After all, aren't they private citizens? The police told Sean there was nothing concrete, and nothing came of it.

SUSSEX SECRETLY PLAN UK EXIT - WILL SHE COME BACK? LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGzN023CzPI

Sean won't say anything against Seamus because they are friends.

https://preview.redd.it/8ryu4esi9ysh1.png?width=683&format=png&auto=webp&s=cc5d391bc5cb4adc9a2814d59514c0f82ab8de2b

But the fact is that Harry was finally taking center stage. He—and he alone—was the focus. And it seems that was what Harry had been missing, to the point where he even spoke to journalists—and in high spirits, too—which took them by surprise.

In all this, Claw is the one in control. Harry doesn't mind that when he can dodge responsibility, but he does when it comes to these events.

Harry is gaining a measure of control because he is finally doing things he enjoys. In doing so, he wants to show KC3 that he is a viable asset to the monarchy. Harry doesn't understand why they don't call him; he hasn't understood it for years.

Claw doesn't want to be called upon. She wants the title, but not the job.

It seems Harry has made it clear to many people that he believes things could turn in his favor if he appears at certain events. Harry believes he is only two events away from KC3 changing his mind. That would explain the NATO situation.

No, Sean isn't saying this is new gossip; it’s the fact that Harry hinted at this during the Invictus event a couple of weeks ago.

The problem is that reality clashes with that fantasy. To begin with, there is the *Daily Mail* matter. It isn't over yet; in fact, the case looks set to conclude on October 22... provided no one appeals. And it appears that the other plaintiffs not only have no intention of appealing but are actually negotiating payment terms with the *Daily Mail*—seemingly each on their own, without informing the others.

Sean also says there are problems at As Ever.

Harry believes the UK is the place to reinvent himself, to get back on the right track... something Claw has no desire to do. She doesn't want to help him with anything. She doesn't want to get involved because the whole UK trip is only temporary. The idea was for the whole matter to be resolved by October—meaning the King would forgive them, they would become the most beloved figures, and everything would work out.

That said, the Harkles will be heading back to Montecito in a couple of weeks.

https://preview.redd.it/tv6xeqnddysh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=8257c78b9bbdedede7b73da6959e585e9a4afd4e

HARRY’S DRAMATIC U TURN OVER THIS HYPED MOVE - REASON IS REVEALED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-YrYItCTno

While Uncle Spencer keeps spouting things that aren't really shocking anyone—since he’s just rehashing a thirty-year-old story known to be untrue—Harry is hell-bent on returning to the royal fold and forcing William to accept him, even if it means doing so by sheer force.

https://preview.redd.it/7poovq0slysh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=6f4e19027077428fec69a3996e1b8524ab07c266

And he wants to make the documentary. But Harry can't find anything worth saying. He can't find anyone willing to talk about Diana, and they don't want to be part of the circus.

Harry has been jumping from one idea to another. Now he plans to do something positive regarding Diana's life... meaning he intends to overlook the secret car rides, the affairs, and so on. Who knows what he’ll want next week.

Harry might think this will convince William to get involved. He doesn't know William.

Amidst all this, Harry has commitments for Invictus that coincide with Camilla’s 80th birthday. Sean suggests the Invictus dates could have been moved, but Harry has absolutely no intention of making a gesture toward Camilla.

So, if Harry still wanted a royal family member to attend Invictus... well, that is a disastrous idea. And the truth is, Harry isn't really concerned about what happens in July, either. He is more interested in presenting Diana in a positive light—at Camilla's expense.

https://preview.redd.it/0n5rxnj6oysh1.png?width=931&format=png&auto=webp&s=693deac01b937e377489ec8722dfb6e993fb8cb0