u/daisybeach23

Lady C Tea YouTube 10/9/26 - The "Did Meghan Markle steal the sheets and towels from Claridge's?" Edition - a few nuggets paraphrased by me

Greetings from Castle Goring, before we plunge in, let me begin with some observations.  With Meghan and Harry desperately trying to grab all the attention for themselves, there has been something at Battersea Park with Elton John and The King and the Executive Chairman of Apple, Tim Cook.  Isn’t it interesting how Sir Elton and The King are so chummy despite the Daily Mail lawsuit?  Also the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester were in Botswana.  They were brilliant.  They are older than I am and it shows how the late Queen’s first cousin can still do Royal duties very well while Meghan chases her Norma Desmond moments and Harry talks endlessly about how much he suffers.   Also, I gather that Claridges would like to put out a message via the bongo bongo drums that someone left with all the linens from a certain hotel room.  The towels and sheets are missing!

Lady C was asked about the alleged apology that the Daily Express reported.  The viewer was assuming the story was true.  Meghan already denied this via People Magazine so I will skip Lady C reading out this article.  Lady C thinks that Meghan planted this story to keep her and Harry on the front pages.  Lady C says the Royal Family totally understand what Harry and Meghan are doing. The Royal Family understand Harry and Meghan crave attention.  Lady C thinks Meghan planted this story for attention and to see what the public reaction would be.  The Royal Family understands that any apology would be self-serving and not genuine.  From what I can tell, Harry and Meghan have not received one positive comment.  And when they unleash their Squad on an innocent priest, and fail to denounce the Squad, it just shows you what you are dealing with. 

Lady C, they are so low.  Out for a photoshoot and uses Malala Yousafzai.  She is a Pakastani Nobel prize winner and Meghan wanted to show the world that she and Malala can have tea together.  It looked like Meghan was wearing half the linens missing from Clarridges.  Her trousers were trailing on the pavement.  She also has an affinity to push up her sleeves to her elbows and she doesn’t realize it misshapes the look of the garment.  Meghan had a tote bag that showed ladies wearing the Burka.  Does Meghan not understand there is a real problem for women in some Muslim countries where they do not want to wear the Burka, and here is Meghan promoting this?  This is not good messaging from Meghan.  Meghan is such a flagrant opportunist, she is actually dangerous, but people can see how flagrant she is.  Why is Meghan advertising a religion?  Both women got a lot of publicity and tomorrow they will be on to something else.

Lady C, is anyone else feeling nauseous from Harry’s latest comments?  Harry said, “Everything I do, everything I put my energy into, I hope my mother would be proud, trying to protect and continue her legacy.  What I didn’t realize is the work I am drawn to, is similar to the work she was drawn to.”  Excuse me?  I don’t recall Diana prostituting herself commercially. On the contrary.  Diana was adamant that people did not make money off her existence.  Anytime someone would do that, she would dump them.  The first thing that needs to be said is that Harry is fronting with a neuroscientist called Dr. Mary Francis O’Connor.  They did a grief management course via Masterclass.  Harry is capitalizing, exploiting, benefiting, selling himself and his grief experience to other people who are grief stricken.  You can be a member for ַ£10 per month.  I don’t know about you, but I think this is seedy and greedy.  Harry is capitalizing upon the death of his mother.  He is selling grief courses to the public.  I am dumbfounded that Harry would find it appropriate to exploit for commercial gain, the grief he endured.  There are organizations out there that don’t charge anything to help people cope with grief.  In my opinion this is low.  This is a man who is by his and his wife’s account, a multi…multi…multi-millionaire.  We don’t know if they are being truthful about this, but I am dumbfounded.  If Harry is an example of somebody who has built resilience through his grief, then I am a bar of soap.  Not only has Harry traduced his mother’s legacy, but Harry, Meghan and Charles Spencer have done more to destroy Diana’s legacy by not allowing sleeping dogs lie.  Recall the therapist told Harry to coat himself in his mother’s favorite scent because he had forgotten the sound of her voice and laugh.  And we know Meghan wore Diana’s perfume on their first date.  This is all grandstanding of the highest order.  Harry could not have forgotten what Diana sounds like.  All Harry needed to do was go to any recording of Diana to refresh his memory.  This is an offensive lie by Harry.  He goes on to lie even more by saying he was so depressed after Megxit and that he moved to Canada to get some space.  That is a lie.  As the Queen said, they took the dogs and weren’t coming back, and she was right.  Harry and Meghan had already made their plans to move to California to make money.  Harry then says he never cried after Diana died.  Harry said he didn’t cry for 15 years until he went to therapy.  The therapist did not connect Harry with his grief; the therapist connected him with his self-pity.  This is very insightful that Harry didn’t cry for 15 years – it tells me that he is emotionless and possibly did not really love his mother.  Harry is exploiting his mother to get a free pass for his and Meghan’s bad behavior.  Diana must be spinning in her grave.  And poor William.  The older son.  The brighter son.  He has enough dignity to leave his mother to rest in peace and not behave as a vulture.

Lady C, I believe Meghan has many forms of narcissism.  Malignant, Machiavellian, Somatic, Grandiose and Communal.  Communal narcissism is when a person uses philanthropy and charity to create a persona of goodness when it is nothing more than a mask whose goal is to garner praise and accolades.  Under the façade, the truth is the opposite.  According to Thomas Markle, Meghan was very helpful as a child.  She was polite and helpful.  And today, she has attached herself to that Pakistani woman.  She does anything she thinks will get her respect and glory.  Harry was trained to do this work and when he is not with Meghan, he does an okay job.  He is sort of a buffoon now, trying to be cheeky chappy, but it comes across as the idiocy of a middle-aged fool.  Meghan does philanthropy badly.  In Canada, Meghan learned that playing up to left wing causes would garner her praise from the Mulroney’s and Trudeau’s.  I wrote in my book how Meghan went to Rwanda and India and only cared about the pictures.  If Meghan possesses the traits of these types of narcissism, I am sure it is because she possesses them.

The rest of the video was about Prince Andrew.

Toodles Sinners!

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 6 days ago

Lady C Tea YouTube 9/2/26 The "Harry and Meghan have turned themselves into pariahs" Edition - a few nuggets paraphrased by me

Greetings from Castle Goring,   my bongo bongo drums from someone who is superbly well connected have told me that Harry and Meghan are looking to rent, not buy.  And they are spreading false stories about wanting to buy.  And I am hearing a lot from the USA that Harry was having Visa issues, and there will have to be accommodations made between the British State and the American State if Harry wants to return to the USA.  At the moment, it is not looking good for H.

Lady C, I thought they would be coming back contrite and looking for redemption.  In fact, they are demanding apologies and telling lies.  Ridiculous.  H in all his raging, thinks his father will reconcile with him?  And here we have it, Harry and Meghan need an excuse for why they will not be reconciling with the Royal Family and the British Establishment.  H&M have made accusations.  They are saying , “We have been wronged.  And until we get what we want, we won’t have anything to do with you.”  It is a stupidly obvious game.  Harry and Meghan are here under sufferance.  If they were to actually be received by the Royal Family, Harry and Meghan wouldn’t be talking about apologies.  Remember last year he said, he just wanted to reconcile with his family and wasn’t seeking any apologies?  Now, they need an excuse as to why the family won’t speak to them.  This is typical of Narcissists, Psychopaths, and people who abuse drugs.  Once you see it, you will always see it.

Lady C, Harry needs to stop taking drugs.  He is paranoia about normal things is worsening.  I could not agree more.  Drug abuse and alcoholism is a progressive disease.  Harry indulges his paranoia left, right and center.  It is so obvious now. 

Lady C, why are the billionaires helping M&H?  Ian Wace is helping to finance Harry and Meghan.  Why?  They are not 20 year olds.  They have had multi-million dollar contracts and own a home.   I want to be clear that the billionaires are “supportive,” not “financing” Meghan and Harry.  Meghan and Harry are destructive and provocative.  This is people who are politically ambitious and are prepared to bend and stretch the prestige of the monarchy for their own purposes.  This is very damaging for the monarchy.  Most people that I know and from what I am hearing, will not be receiving Harry and Meghan in the Cotswolds.  People like Wace may use Harry and Meghan, but they are not top tier.  The top tier wants nothing to do with Harry and Meghan.  The fact that Harry and Meghan are the King’s son and daughter-in-law would have made them more sought after, but they turned themselves into absolute pariahs.  It is interesting to see how even the King’s son and daughter-in-law have managed to work themselves out of top drawer and into third or fourth drawer.

A viewer asks Lady C about Harry and Meghan’s politics and she says this:

Harry and Meghan’s political leanings are best compared to the German Worker’s National Socialist Party.  They are extremely right wing in terms of their behavior, demeanor and arrogance, that doesn’t exist in today’s modern world.  You would have to go back to 1787 to the peak arrogance of the French Aristocracy to find a comparison for Meghan and Harry on entitlement, all the while claiming to be great supporters of liberalism.  Let’s recall that Harry has Travelyst, which encourages people to travel cheaply so that it will be environmentally friendly.  Harry and Meghan actually don’t care about that.  Look at how they travel.  Everything must be private.  Their excuse?  Privacy.  The reality?  Old fashioned arrogance.  And Harry expects the government to pay his security.  If Shabana Mahmood is dumb enough to give Harry what he wants, will he be grateful?  I don’t think so.

Lady C, what is the real reason they came back?  Can you filter out all the noise?  The information I am receiving every day from the USA is because there were issues with Harry’s Visa is the motivating force why they had to come back so suddenly.  And yes, there is a lot of noise.  Harry and Meghan like creating noise.  Let us wait and see if Harry returns to the USA.  If he returns, it means there is a new accommodation that allows him to enter without the fear of arrest.  It is my understanding that Harry does not think it is safe for him to try and return to the USA.  I wonder if Trump did KC3 a favor.  I wonder if KC3 wanted to force Harry and his children back to the UK and force Meghan to make a decision.  This changes the power dynamic with Harry and Meghan because she can no longer force him to live in the USA.

Toodles Sinners!

PS:  I am a day behind.  Today’s video is about how H&M are colluding with the MSM to screw the BRF and get security, but I probably won’t have a summary until tomorrow!

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 1 month ago

Lady C Tea YouTube 8/29/26 - The "Media is publishing rubbish for clicks - The Royal Family do not want Harry back" Edition - a few nuggets paraphrased by me

Greetings from Castle Goring,   

Lady C, I hear the Cotswolds is a lovely place, but it does get cold and damp.   I do suspect that Meghan will be back in Montecito sprinkling dead rose petals by November after she gets frozen and her stiletto booties are stuck in the mud.  You are not so far removed from what everybody is saying.  This is an unofficial separation from a way of life in all but appearances.  The reality is, Harry and Meghan’s marriage has forked.  One may say it is a de facto, unacknowledged separation.  They are not ready to divorce, but they are going to be leading totally separate lives except for the few, odd occasions in the UK.  Her plan is to go back and forth from Montecito and UK.  Let’s see how long they can hold onto Montecito.  Maybe they can pull a hat trick and in 5 years time, they will still have that house, but I am not willing to place a bet on that.  What is going on behind the scenes, may stymie their intentions.  Alison Boshoff is basically saying that Harry and Meghan have a 15-year plan, where Harry intends to stay for the duration of the children’s education.  Meghan intends to come and go.  They have an arrangement.  I have a source in the Democratic party who said this about the comparisons of Andrew vs Harry:

"Andrew settled his case with VG for a monetary sum.  After this, the Queen removed Andrew’s titles or styles.  Andrew was never faced with having to leave the UK and live in the USA.  Harry’s situation is different and far more serious.  Harry obtained residency illegally and did business there illegally.  Harry may possibly be extradited before the end of year 2026 because he lied on his government documents. Harry is not above the law and there is a mandatory 5-year prison sentence.  This is not conjecture or hype.  This is not a matter of if.  He did it.  He lied on his Visa paperwork, the same way he lied in Nicklin’s court.  The timing of when this information will be exposed is potentially incendiary for the monarchy which is why Charles and William are being kept in the intelligence loop so all can be handled and the Royal Family is not damaged moving forward.  You are astute enough to know that all this tumult would not be happening in the daily news if there was not a truthful element to stir the pot.  Trump won’t stop the DOJ from having him extradited if it benefits Trump, but Trump will change his mind for the right incentive."

We have no way of knowing what is in Trump’s political best interest, but this was sent to me to make the point there are real concerns and the news is feeding us stories to make us falsely optimistic.  My personal instinct is that Harry will not be arrested.  I think Trump will extend courtesy to another Head of State but who knows…Megsy Baby may have to make a court appearance. 

Lady C, Meghan looks like a Demon.  You can see it in her eyes even when she was a child.  I was told by many people who knew her as a child, they said she was nasty and toxic.  She behaved like a monster at a child’s birthday party when she took over the party and played like she was The Princess of the party and not the birthday girl.  Thomas Markle thought she was a good child, but Meghan’s siblings always said Meghan would turn nasty every time she would visit with her mother.  There is evidence that Meghan was always a bad seed, as was Harry.  Harry did not exhibit viciousness before he met Meghan.  I do think Meghan has Charles Manson eyes.

Lady C, I don’t believe for a second that Meghan will divorce Harry without walking away with a fortune.  They will remain married until the children grow up.  During that time, Harry will keep trying to return as an active Royal, and she will continue to enjoy the status.  Your prediction is not implausible.  Going off my knowledge of Meghan’s personality type and my lifelong experience of dealing with people with Meghan’s personality traits, I have always made the point that she will not leave unless she finds something better.  That doesn’t mean the scales won’t fall off Harry’s eyes and he may decide he wants out.  I do not want to make any predictions here.  But remember, Harry is a junior member of the Royal Family, and he is not seriously rich.  There is no way Harry can earn his way to being super rich.  Meghan has tried to earn the money and says she plans to continue to earn the money in California while Harry is in the UK.  How is Meghan going to find someone new?  She is not a Jackie Kennedy.  She is not revered, she is reviled.  Maybe she can find some nerd or some billionaire’s stupid son.  Yes, I do think Harry will try to retrieve his prior situation.  He said so in Ukraine.  He said he was a working member of the Royal Family, the problem is the rest of the family don’t want him.  Let’s see how all this pans out.

Lady C, what do you think of the article by Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon published in the Telegraph saying Harry should be allowed back in the Royal Family specifically catering to the needs of Army Community?  It is rubbish..but he is a columnist and the pages need to be filled.  There is so much rubbish being written about and so many ridiculous positions being adopted.  In my view he has made irresponsible comments such as combat changing people, causing PTSD,  and this is the reason for some of Harry’s outbursts and erratic behavior.  What is the excuse for 3-year old Harry riding his tricycle into the shins of visiting Army officers?  How could that have been PTSD?  And how could Harry have PTSD when he was protected at all times?  He was known as bunker Harry. The actual veteran who drew enemy fire while flying a helicopter was Prince Andrew.  Why doesn’t anyone wonder if he had PTSD?  Then The Colonel makes other stupid point basically saying the Royal Family is shrinking in numbers.  He must be mad not to understand that no member of the Royal Family wants Harry back.  This is terrible misdirection by someone who is supposed to know what is going on.

Lady C repeats past information.  Harry and Meghan needed to leave America quickly because of Harry’s Visa problems.  She says all these stories about the King wanting Harry back as a working Royal is rubbish.  A lot of what the working press tells us is claptrap.  William is the next King.  Catherine is the next Queen.  Yes, the King has cancer, but Lady C knows what kind of cancer he has, and she knows he is receiving cutting edge treatments and could live a long time.  However, the treatment could stop working at any time.  This means William and Catherine have to be ready.  Charles understands this and would not cut off William at his feet. 

Lady C tells us that 30 years ago, People Magazine wrote that the book that best represents Diana was written by Lady C.  In her book, she said that Charles did not resent Diana for being more popular than him.  Charles resented Diana’s competitiveness.  Any reports that Charles resents William for being popular are not true. They may not always agree but they have a respectful relationship.

Lady C agrees with a viewer comment that Harry may have been stood down from African Parks because his mere presence was drawing too much attention to what is going on over there (meaning they are supposed to be about conservation but are really about minerals and oil).  She says let’s wait and see if we hear more and is very interested to see what will happen with Sentabale.

Toodles Sinners!

PS: Sinners many of you ask me what the Democratic Party has to do with all of this. Lady C has been saying for over a month now that she has a vetted, impeccable source who is a Democratic operative. She says she trusts this source.

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Lady C Tea YouTube 8/28/26 - The "Meghan brings nothing to the table - She is now replaceable by an attractive scullery maid" Edition - a few nuggets paraphrased by me

Greetings from Castle Goring,   my..my…we have so much to talk about so let’s proceed under the lens of fun.  I know that lens is someone else’s work….I am so authentic. 

Lady C, William has all the makings of a King.  From snippets I have seen with him during social occasions.  He is affable, relatable, and knows how to have fun.  Yet he knows how to wear the cloak of seriousness when the occasion calls for it.  He will be an excellent monarch.  William has dignity.  Catherine has dignity.  Certain qualities are innately spiritual.   Dignity is one of them.  Glamour is another.  And so is affability.  Harry has affability, but he does not have dignity.  Harry is a joker and a clown.  I think William is on track to be a skilled operator at the highest level.  I think he will be a fine Monarch as long as he is not too woke.

Lady C, I have noticed a flurry of anti-Lady C videos on the Internet ever since Huggie and Druggie announced they were moving back to the UK.  LOL….you aren’t the only person who has brought this to my attention.  I don’t look at any of that.  Unless something is defamatory, I just let it go.

Lady C, their playbook is so generic, they show us exactly who they are.  Meghan Markle tells Oprah, “It’s not their right to take it away.    I am not going to offer up my child to people who called him the N-Word.”  And when H was asked about his father and Catherine having cancer he said, “I have my own family to think of.”  When people show you who they are, believe them.  Then coming back to the UK is a big Eff You to the UK public and the British Royal Family.  I think this is mostly correct.  They may have the right to be in this country, but they have overstretched their welcome in the USA.  Try telling Eff You to Donald Trump.  They may have the right to live in the UK, but their game was played in the USA, and it didn’t work.  Harry flouted every rule and regulation.  Harry thinks he can do whatever he pleases.  The reality is, Harry is a failure and we don’t need to take the time to count all the failures.

A viewer tells Lady C she doesn’t think Harry will ever divorce Meghan.  Lady C proceeds to talk in a roundabout way that she believes her democrat source who talked about Harry’s lady friend.  She thinks it is possible the move to the UK is the precursor to the scales dropping off Harry’s eyes and his withdrawal from the narcissist Meghan.  She uses her own family as an example to basically show that Harry could reach a point where he no longer values anything Meghan brings to the relationship, because none of Meghan’s plots and schemes have worked out.  Not only is Meghan replaceable, but she is replaceable by a good-looking scullery maid.

Lady C, I think two insane people have found each other.  They belong in an institution where they can get proper treatment.  The problem goes way beyond normal counseling.  You are not the only person who thinks this.  There is little doubt, going off their conduct they are disturbed, out of touch with reality, and are both nasty.   I have said for years that Meghan and Harry are a folie a deux.

Lady C, will we see a Netflix show, “The Royal Return?”  It will feature all the drama, the kids, the return to school.  And who will the nemesis be?  The Walkes family will slot in nicely.  The Sussex show has ran for nearly 10 years and this is just another season.  I hesitate to read this because we don’t want to give them any ideas.  I gather this has not been commissioned but maybe Ted Sarandos can get this going to scrape the egg of his face that he acquired after defending Meghan.  I don’t think we should encourage this.  Netflix knows Meghan and Harry are not popular.  If Netflix were to commission this, it would do so knowing it would poison its pond with Charles, William and Catherine.   Alienating William and Catherine is a long-term problem as they are young.  And I guarantee that if William and Catherine participated in a documentary, it would get more views.

Lady C says Lili is too young for boarding school.  Archie is day boarding.  She will not speculate on the schools because the children deserve privacy.  She thinks the reason why they create so much nonsense on “privacy” is for attention.  Lady C says there is a difference between having boundaries and keeping everything “secret”

Toodles Sinners!

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

More gossip just for funzies - X is talking about this a lot tonight - the book by discarded friend is Very Good!

u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Blind Gossip - Enty Lawyer - Did Meghan need to personally pick up her egg retrieval paperwork? And does Jessica Mulroney know everything? Oh dear?

u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Lady C Tea YouTube 8/26/26 - The "Democrats and Republicans unite in their dislike of Meghan Markle" Edition

Greetings from Castle Goring,   

Lady C, do you think the surrogacy issue will ever come out?  It is out, as an issue.  All the questions that need to be asked, have been asked.  All the observations that need to be made, have been made.  I suppose what you are asking is will we ever have a resolution or clarification?  An announcement?  The matter put to rest, forever?  I am not a fortune teller.  But, I will very surprised if the matter were ever dealt with to the total satisfaction of everybody.  In contentious situations such as this, the best way to deal with things would be to divert.  For example, Lord Archie Mountbatten-Windsor and Lady Lillibet Mountbatten-Windsor.  Harry could have made this go away by surrendering The Titles because the children are never going to be working Royals – I think this would have satisfied most people.  As a result of Meghan’s conduct, the issue has bubbled and bubbled over. 

Lady C, why is King Charles not more forceful on pushing back on the story of a rapprochement?  It is undignified.  It is unseemly.  It is a bad diplomatic and political move.  I have said this every time Harry and Meghan put out into the press their nonsense, including all this talk of reconciliation, and living in Windsor Castle, and Archie and Lili are going to become working Royals…..People are so caught up in the drama, but they don’t understand there are certain things a monarch can and cannot do and behaving with dignity is one of them.  The Monarch isn’t going to sling mud and react to rubbish – he would lose respect internationally.  Look at how people criticize Trump whenever he reacts to things he does not like.  It is no different than if the King responds on a daily basis to all these brickbats……disengagement as much as possible, is the only way to deal with people with drug problems and personality disorders.  Family members of people in a 12-step program are taught “loving detachment.”  You let them spin their wheels and play their games, and you stay disengaged as mush as you can.   Charles cannot announce that he does not wish for a rapprochement with his son and daughter in law.  They would be the height of indignity.

Lady C, now that Harry and Meghan are in the UK, they will manage to do the half in half out right in front of the noses of the British people.  They will cut ribbons and open charities even though they are not working Royals.  What do you think?  Not necessarily.  I do think they will be mavericks and rebels and chaffing at the bit to deliver loads whenever possible.  Putting that aside, they are here under sufferance.  They will already understand they are in an invidious position.,  If there was ever a possibility of deflating their balloon, this is it.  Will they do something?  Yes, occasionally.  But I understand that Meghan plans to be a fleeting visitor.  I know Harry will be out and about with Well Child, Scotty’s and Invictus….and the Palace would prefer that Harry represent himself in a more respectable way…. and it may look like he is a working Royal, but William is having none of it and neither is Charles.   So, let us see what they do.  They made in clear in Australia they have torn up the Sandringham agreement, but they have just left America with their tails between their legs with serious financial problems and HUGE, HUGE problems behind the scenes.  It think you will see “some hiatuses.”  They will not be allowed to setup a rival court.  If they try it, they will be crushed.  Let’s leave it at that.

Lady C, I can’t get over the fact that the one thing that unites Democrats and Republicans in the dislike of Meghan Marke.  She is so repulsive.  She is so repellant.  She is so pushy.  She is so toxic.  She is so undesirable.  She vaunted herself up on the social scale then came back down.  I was stunned to discover that the Democrats are avid to not give the impression that Meghan Markle is desirable in their political party.  When Meghan married into the Royal Family, it was the position that garnered her the attention, and that of Hillary Clinton and Jill Biden.  Once they realized she was trouble and uncontrollable and a loose cannon, they put distance from her.  Meghan is so dumb, she didn’t seem to understand how her backstabbing of the Royal Family looked to everyone.  Treachery is viewed as a failing, and no politician would want anything to do with her.  None of us set out to dislike Meghan Markle.  We were all thrilled at first.  Then she showed us her character.

Lady C, do you think that Archewell’s donation of $250,000 to Joe Biden’s daughter’s charity was to buy Harry time with the government?  I was told by my sources that there is a connection, but it was not a bribe.  It was a donation.  The people in the Democratic party have told me they view it as a bribe.  Do you remember how arrogant Harry and Meghan were around this time?  A Prince and his spouse are not supposed to be engaging in politics or be affiliated with a political party.  Harry, in my opinion, has done things that he could actually be charged with being an agent of a foreign state.  This was completely ignored by the USA and UK.  This donation does imply corruption.  If it wasn’t a bribe, it was an attempt to gain political influence.   Harry and Meghan have made every mistake, in terms of poisoning their pond.  They thought they could flaunt themselves and do whatever they please….and look at them now.  Are the IRS and ICE looking into them?

Lady C thinks that Penguin Random House would have double checked with Harry before publishing Spare on whether he was sure he wanted to make the disclosures about his drug use, but she does not know either way.  Harry is married to the greatest legal mind of all time, Rachel Zane, so Lady C is sure Harry was well advised on this. 

Lady C says never has she seen two jerks, wreak so much havoc, be as nasty as they could just to make money, get their comeuppance the way these two now are. 

Toodles Sinners!

PS: RIP Dolly Parton you goddess of talent and decency. RIP Tim Curry you were amazing in all your movies, as “Nigel St. Nigel “ on Psych, and as "Dale The Whale" on Monk.

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Lady C Tea YouTube 8/24/26 - The "Meghan Markle humiliated herself....again" Edition - a few nuggets paraphrased by me

Greetings from Castle Goring,   

Lady C, anyone else think that the only reason Meghan Markle agreed to come back is because Harry has a serious relationship with another woman and she saw her grift on him disappearing?  The drama will continue.  Mehgan is already pretending for the sake of her “reputation” in the USA that she has been offered a big role in a Guy Ritchie production.  We read her like a book.  Let me put it this way…..if Meghan Markle were offered the starring role in that production, the fee she receives would not even cover 6 months of her clothes.  6 months of stardom would not solve her financial problems.  This is all poppycock.  And now we hear that Guy Ritchie (whose parents I knew rather well) withdrew the offer.  Meghan is the one who was broadcasting all of this, in an attempt to make herself look popular, and now she has to face the humiliating prospect, that owning to the backlash from people who said they would never watch season 3 of The Gentlemen, the offer has now been withdrawn.  LOL….one tear…left eye……….now, you have raised an interesting question…..Would Meghan Markle have allowed those children to be moved to the UK and attend school, with all this implies in terms of jurisdiction and marital home status, if she was not under some duress?  This could also be financial duress.  Remember that maintaining that Montecito address also is not going to be a financial savings for them.  So, we can rule out that the primary motivation being financial.  So, has Harry actually met someone else?   For legal reasons, I am not saying he has.   Is there truth to what I was told by the Democrats that Harry is developing interest in philosophy and the relative merits of Kant vs Wittgenstein?  Even if Harry were forced to repatriate as a result of his Visa issues he has to deal with, think for a second…..Meghan wouldn’t have to move to the UK with the children…..this move tells me that from Meghan’s view, this is a clever move for her.  She is so manipulative, but Meghan always outmaneuvers herself.  Meghan thinks she is the fox, but she always manages to turn herself into prey.  I think this idea that Meghan wants to get Harry away from Montecito has merit.  For legal reasons, I will say that if Harry has developed interest elsewhere or Meghan is worried about this, and she thinks her grip on Harry will be nullified, of course she will go along with the move.  The word behind the scenes is this move is more for show than go.  I am hearing Meghan will not commit to anything for any length of time.  It would seem she is laying the groundwork to be in and out, so she can pursue her financial interests, mostly in America……I wonder…. What would  I do if I were in love with somebody and I had been forced to move to another country?  There are telephones, airplanes and visits.  Oh dear…oh dear….let’s see how this works out.

Lady C, I do not think King Charles can ever have a good relationship with two sons.  I am sure you are right.  The Kings relationship with Harry has been irretrievably warped.  It has been indubitably damaged by the behavior of Meghan and Harry.  I can tell there is no way that Charles will ever be able to trust Harry again.  My understanding is that Charles does not want to trust Harry ever again.  They used to have a very friendly and compatible relationship.  Before Meghan, Harry was more compatible with Charles than Charles was with William.  Harry is more emotional than William.  Charles is more sentimental than William.  Charles’ sentimentality and Harry’s emotionalism made for a far freer flow for father and son than William’s edgy, reserved, almost intellectually standoffish personality.  It did not flow as easy for Charles and William.  But, with the passage of time, and everything that has happened, William and Charles have achieved a working relationship, a rapprochement, and a respect for each other that did not come naturally.  If you think that Charles blames William for what has happened, you are wrong.  Charles lays the blame where it belongs.  Let’s remember the contents of the book Spare.  Let’s remember Harry envisaging killing his father.  Let’s remember Harry accusing his stepmother of being a dreadful human being.  Let’s remember the way Harry treated his grandparents.  All of this is factored into equations.  And then you have the much more aloof, more intransigent (at times) William.  But then both Charles and Harry can also be intransigent.  But William and Charles have a mature respect for each other.  And there is real distrust where Harry is concerned.  Charles will never have a good relationship with both his sons.  Unless Harry turns over a new leaf, Charles will have a mistrustful, suspicious, distant, watched and estranged relationship with his father.

Lady C, the best way to deal with these two narcissistic people is go to parallel or no contact.  And if they must interact, use the gray rock method.  It is important for them to never be alone with them, communicate only in writing, and refuse to justify, argue, defend and explain because this will only give the sick individuals the ammunition to twist their words which we’ve seen them do.  It seems like Prince William is already using this method to protect his family.  He’s a very smart man of good judgment.  William is sane, sound and sensible.  He is intelligent.  He does have good judgement.  He has adopted the technique that I used with my mother.  Where Harry and Meghan are concerned, you cannot be optimistic to think that the animal won’t attack you just because the animal has not attacked for a period of time.  William and Catherine are making sure they cannot be attacked again by freezing them out and that is a wise way to deal with them.  Charles has a different relationship with Harry.  Paternal love is different than a fraternal relationship.  Charles is also the monarch, and he has to deal with things according to his own conscience and scruples and this does not always accord with William’s.  But don’t think that Charles is a pushover and is welcoming Harry back as if nothing ever happened.  That is not going to happen.  When you are dealing with the public eye, there are dimensions to your choices.  It is different when you are private and people aren’t watching you.  Going no contact when you are Royal allows you to keep some distance.  All contact is usually done private secretary to private secretary.  The Royal doesn’t pick up the phone and call the other Royal.  No contact is not always possible.  For example, family members can get sick.  Life is not simple and straightforward. 

Lady C, does Harry and his cabal have to pay David Sherbourne?  There is talk that Harry and the claimants are on a no-win, no fee arrangement.  I am not sure if this is accurate, because if the claimants were on this type of arrangement, you have to enter this into the record, and I have not heard of anyone seeing this.

Lady C, why do they share everything?  The house in Montecito.  A house in Portugal.  Visiting the King.  Why didn’t they just visit him, and no one would know?  Very good point.  If it is true that Harry is being forced to decamp, it would benefit them to announce this in the hope that he does not get arrested.  I was told on August 11^(th) that Harry may have his Visa rescinded.  I think there were leaks on this to get Harry and Meghan to voluntarily leave.  Harry and Meghan know how to be covert.  They went to Portugal, Jamaica, and Mexico without people knowing.  All this nonsense about being hounded by the Press is rubbish.  What they do is hound themselves.  They create the impression they are hounded but they are not.  Meghan loves to let everyone know what she is doing.

Lady C, will you invite Harry and Meghan to Castle Goring for tea?  I will let you in on a little secret.  I can’t receive them for tea until they have first been received by The King and Queen, The Prince and Princess of Wales, The Princess Royal, and The Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh.  And then after that?????  Maybe if some production company paid me £5-£10 million pounds, then I would bite the bullet and invite them for tea. Harry and Meghan would also want £5-£10 million pounds, so it would be the most expensive tea in history, but I have an expensive castle to run so I would be stupid to turn it down.  Otherwise, I would never want to receive them.  I know too much about them, especially her.  It would feel like sucking Hitler’s bones and chewing on Mao Zedong’s corpse.  Perhaps someday, if Harry divorced Meghan, and reverted to some form of his old self, and was in a 12-step program, then perhaps I would receive him for tea, but never Meghan Markle.  I think she is totally, totally, totally dreadful.  I would only endure the discomfort for money for Castle Goring.

 

Toodles Sinners!

PS.  Check out my new flair.  I had to do it.  IFYKYK

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Lady C Tea 8/21/26 - The "Feds are chasing Harry while Meghan is a total failure" Edition - a few nuggets paraphrased by me....you may want to grab a strong beverage for this read.

Greetings from Castle Goring,   

Lady C, please share what your bongo bongo drums about Harry and Meghan returning to the UK.  It has been rather interesting.  The last thing that I got was day before yesterday.  Here is what it says: Thank you for the details provided, I have updated and validated the claim.

Dear Lady C, I have inside information tonight for you to be the first the break the news about H&M announcement to return to the UK.  The REAL reasons for such an abrupt move the UK,  they won’t talk about it to the press.  I want you to hear it so you can share on your channel ahead of the other commentators.  The breaking news about H&M imminent return is not what it seems.  They are exiting the US for far more serious reason and not what their camp is spinning to the press.  New York and Washington DC confirmed the actual and much more serious reason is because the Feds were closing in on H for falsifying his immigration papers for entry into the USA.  Preparations were being made to nullify his Visa status and kick him out along with the real possibility of criminal charges and prison time for falsifying documents and other documents.  So to save face, they are spinning it a different way to make them look good.  The other reason is they are going broke, financially.  M needs to hang onto H to keep her connection to Royalty and M wants to get H far away from the other woman who is an American.

LOL…I think this is all very incendiary.  

This Redditors note:  Lady C went on to read another note sent to her on August 12th from a person asking Lady C to contact the State Department regarding Harry’s Visa documents and to keep the Royal Family out of it.  Then this person told her she can’t be sued because of Sullivan V New York Times which is a landmark Supreme Court case in the USA protecting freedom of speech.  Sadly, this case cannot be used in the UK and Harry is moving back so I just didn’t think this was even worth the time to paraphrase this one.  Then Lady C says it would be too dangerous to read anything more on the note.

Lady C thinks it makes sense that Harry would deport himself back to the UK rather than actually be deported.

There are all kinds of things happening behind the scenes with all sorts of politicians.  I find it interesting that the Democratic party in the USA wants nothing to do with Meghan.  There is a bipartisan effort to have nothing to do with Meghan. 

Their announcement of keeping three residences going is Harry pretending that there is no threat to his status in the USA, but they are hoping this will prevent the State Department from moving against Harry.  Wouldn’t it be terrible if the State Department found that Harry forged document?  I was told this is a mandatory prison sentence for forging Visa documents.  Of course, Meghan has leaked that the reason for the return is for rapprochement, and she has also leaked that perhaps the King’s health is not as good as we thought it was.  Meghan always finds a way to pull a rabbit out of a hat, hence the reason why they have bolted. 

The King says he only just learned about this, but my information is that Harry and Meghan had been looking at schools many months ago.  There is no way to be delicate about this.  Harry and Meghan are facing huge failure.  Look at the sequence of events over the last few weeks.  Nile Gardner and The Heritage Foundation have done interviews on this.  We know President Trump does not want to do anything to embarrass the King and William.  All of this has been rushed because Harry and Meghan finally understand that we were going to find out that Harry had forged his Visa documents.  And while all of this is going on, Harry loses his court case with ANL…AND I had been reliably informed by the Democratic Party of the United States of America that Harry has been having philosophical conversations discussing the relative merits of the philosophies of Immanuel Kant and Wittgenstein.  Of course, moving to the UK turns down the heat and discussions, and this is in Meghan’s favor.  What is not in Meghan’s favor is that Meghan will have to give up her dream of being a huge star and on the A-list, presenting Oscars and being the greatest star since Norma Desmond.  Oh I forgot, that is fiction, but then, so is Meghan, isn’t it?   

And the children, by being put into school in the UK, this now creates an argument that Britain is now the matrimonial home.  Meghan is no fool and she knows there are significant financial problems, but she knows the time to repatriate assets back into the UK is now.  She knows that any money she and Harry made in the USA, they will avoid capital gains taxes if they return to the UK because Harry has stayed out of the UK for 6 tax years.  That is a significant savings for them. 

Meghan is basically saying she is keeping her options open by saying they are keeping the Montecito home, what they represent is a home in Portugal (we won’t even go there because it is a farce), and a home in the UK.

For legal reasons, I make no assertions that Harry has committed a crime, but I do not think the fact that he moves, that does not erase if in fact he has committed a crime and the consequences.

Meghan is far cannier than Harry.  When she was being interviewed by Emily Chung, while they were eating a hamburger, and Meghan didn’t bother to put a napkin in her lap, and she ate the hamburger like a swine would eat a hamburger, showing us how she is totally lacking in all civility, anyway she was asked about Trump and refused to answer.  Harry didn’t do that.  Harry mocked Trump on Colbert show – not so clever, Harry.

I think will all that has been going on, we can safely conclude, this will play out for a while because if the State Department is after Harry, whether he is living in the UK, does not mean Harry cannot be charged.  Harry is responsible for his own conduct and for boasting about his drug taking in his book, Spare.

Do you think they will actually keep the Montecito house?  It is expensive to run, it is on a big mortgage, has huge taxes, and they have serious financial problems.  Meghan doesn’t like England.  Will she move back to the USA?  I could see that happening.  Sometimes they get along very well, and other times, not so much.    I think Meghan’s ideal scenario is that Harry is in the UK, Meghan is in the USA, while Harry continues to pay for her dreams, while she continues to fail at having them realized. 

Let’s be clear about a few things.  This is an absolute failure for Meghan and Harry.  Andy Burnham was asked about their security.  He said this is a private matter.  I should also point out there are three children of our longest reigning monarch who have never had round the clock, armed security like Harry thinks he should have for himself, his wife and his children.  RAVEC is for people who are public servants. 

Lady C, do you think William and Harry will reconcile now that he and The Witch are moving back to England?  Not a chance.  William and Catherine know what they are dealing with.  And notwithstanding all this hullaballoo, The King and Queen also know what they are dealing with.   This is all very nuanced because you have to realize that the UK will be the new matrimonial home.  It won’t matter how often Meghan flies in and out to California.  And the Royal Family would prefer that the ultimate purposes are realized with minimal injury. 

Lady C praises herself for not revealing her gossip on 8/12/26 about Harry’s Visa documents. 

Toodles Sinners!

PS:  Sinners, I can only imagine how this will read because I am LOL and SMH at the same time.   Lady C is dead serious about all of this, and I am over here like, hmmmmm, but she is very endearing and this IS just gossip.  Not sure I believe that Harry was going to be chased down by the Feds, but maybe it was possible his Visa documents would be made public and Harry is trying to avoid that because if he did do something illegal, his tiles may be in jeopardy.  And I can say is that Harry is a massive embarrassment to The Royal Family no matter what.

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Lady C Tea YouTube 8/20/26 - The "Are Meghan and Harry being chased out?" Edition - a few nuggets paraphrased by me.

Greetings from Castle Goring,   

Lady C, this is a wakeup call and warning to King Charles.  If he brings back Harry, Meghan and the children into the Royal Fold, the accusation of racism will always be used against the monarchy in order to get their own way.  Meghan will always accuse the family of racism if they don’t defend her in the media.  They will use people to attack the Wales children in order to elevate Archie and Lili.  The soap opera will continue, but this time with greater harm to the monarchy.  I agree with this.  I think this most recent debacle of are they coming or not?  Are they staying in Buckingham Palace or not?  Will they get security or not? So much drama, as usual.  Springing surprises as usual.  I have been receiving communications from Democrat operators the USA which I will reveal tomorrow.  Meghan has blotted her copy with everyone in America.  She is disliked by Trump and Harry has been creating problems with the State Department.  Harry and Meghan are running.  They are running because Harry didn’t want to be pushed.  There is no shelter for him.  The Democrats do not like Meghan Markle.  They are regarded poisonous and toxic.  It is really interesting, but today I want to focus on the danger that Meghan and the children represent to harmonious race relations.

Meghan is not a victim of a racist press because the press was not being racist.  Just like Jason Arday, she is not a victim of the press, but Meghan likes trouble.

However, I do not think we should fear they will become working Royals.  I just don’t see it.  Harry, Meghan and their merry little band of whatsappers……I’m sorry, the evidence does not stack up in that favor.  I am sure The King would be happy to neutralize Harry and Meghan, and somehow get through to Harry that Harry has made cardinal errors…..but that is not the same thing as wanting them back.  Nobody wants them back.

I know Charles and William think Black people love them, and many do, but there is a minority who do not.  Anytime, they don’t get what they want, children included, they will accuse the Royal Family of racism.

Lady C thinks Charles Spencer’s book will potentially setup bandwagons for Harry and Meghan to jump on.  Since we haven’t read the book yet, we do not know, but we do know Harry and Meghan love feeling aggrieved about anything at all.

Lady C says that the promise William made in 1994 to restore Diana’s HRH after he ascended to the throne was the promise of a young boy who expected his mother to be alive when he ascended to the throne.  Lady C does not think William will do this because he is now more aligned with his grandmother QEII regarding the use of the titles.  She said something I did not know which is there were discussions to make her a Princess in her own right (HRH Princess Diana) just like they did with Prince Philip but it did not happen. 

Lady C compares Meghan Markle and Jason Arday.  Apparently, there are some news reports that Meghan is vindicated because Jason was covered harshly by the press and the implication is it was because they were both black. Lady C says they are both liars who were caught out in the wort possible way.  Both unable to admit they were wrong.  One of them told damaging lies about other people, and one told lies to prop himself up.  Lady C says Meghan Markle is crazy to think she is vindicated.  Is Meghan working herself to align herself with Jason Arday via Misan Harriman?  Maybe they are all getting ready to say that but for the racism in the UK, Meghan and Harry would not have had to leave.  But, we all know Meghan doesn’t want to come back to the UK unless she is given Windsor Castle, which we know will happen when pigs fly.

 Toodles Sinners!

PS:  It sounds like Lady C says there are political forces chasing Harry away, but she wasn’t being very clear. Also, she didn't really mention the UK move specifically, so I am not sure when she filmed this video. I will post again tomorrow and should have more clarifications about Lady C's thoughts.

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Lady C Tea YouTube 8/18/26 - The "Meghan tried to pull an Ann Boleyn, but William had her figured out from the start" Edition - a few nuggets paraphrased by me

Greetings from Castle Goring,   

Lady C, I believe Meghan was hoping to create the scandal of the century and pull an Ann Boleyn, stealing William and leading to the divorce from Catherine Middleon (not Aragon).  She could then divorce Harry, leading to Meghan becoming Princess of Wales and ultimately Queen. I agree with you Lady C that William has the brain cells that Harry doesn’t.  William saw right through Meghan from the word “go.”  What you have said is not too far off the mark from what several people feared this was Meghan’s real game plan.  And William’s behavior suggests that he was aware of this plan.  He never allowed himself to be in the same room as Meghan alone.  Is Meghan that transparent?  I would never presume to tell you what William was thinking at that time, but I can tell you what people who actually know this situation have told me.  They are not far off the mark.  Meghan’s bizarre thinking process is so extraordinary that this may have well been one of her aces in the hole that she wanted to play.  There are so many pictures of her making goo goo eyes at William.  Her behavior was so strange, so bizarre, some people actually think Meghan viewed herself as Her Majesty Queen Meghan of the United Kingdom married to her consort William V.  What is interesting is this scenario was actually contemplated and steps taken to guard against.

Lady C, I am not a fan, but I do not think we should underestimate Meghan and Harry.  Nobody should underestimate them.  This problem has grown exponentially, and I admit I initially underestimated Meghan and Harry.  My understanding is the Royal Family underestimated Meghan and Harry and Meghan particularly.  They had no idea Meghan was capable of such gross misbehavior.  I am not referring to a moonbump, no way…no not that…definitely not that……Nobody imagined in 2019 that Meghan would try to commercialize and monetize her Royal Status.  The family could not believe that Meghan would leave with Harry the way she did.  The Queen was the first person to say they aren’t coming back.  She was a dog lover and she said, “They’re not coming back.  They’ve taken the dogs.”  Nobody could believe how Meghan set everything up.  And then for her to snipe back at tell QEII, “You don’t own the word Royal.”  And then the Oprah interview.  They couldn’t believe the brazen lies that came out of her mouth.  And her race baiting.  And now, they no longer underestimate her.  Once you discover someone is ruthless enough to do anything, say anything, and tell any lie to get them to achieve their objective, you are dealing with a totally different level.  But, what has played out is that Meghan and Harry have backed themselves into a corner, and they have no more cards to play.  The Royal Family now has their measure and they are not fearsome.  They know what they are dealing with.

Toodles Sinners!

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Lady C Tea YouTube 8/16/26 and 8/17/26 - The "Meghan Markle can't be the new Wallis Simpson because Meghan never had a King give up a throne for her" Edition - a few nuggets paraphrased by me

Greetings from Castle Goring,   

Lady C, do you think she set out to be rude and disrespectful on purpose?  I think she set out to be the next Wallis Simpson.  What do you think?  She wanted to be the next Princess of Wales and Queen of England I think.  Her ambitions were beyond the realms of reason.  She made a study of the Royal Family.  She made a study of the dynamics of The Royal Family.  To answer your questions specifically.  I do not think at first, Meghan set out to be antagonistic in terms of The Royal Family. I think she did set out to be antagonistic in terms of Harry’s social circle because she saw she could not fit in…she saw that she was a misfit.  Meghan knew if she could play on Harry’s ambiguities, she could gain control over him.  Meghan has sussed out that Harry was a submissive and that she could dominate him.   According to Thomas Markle Sr, Meghan would look across a room at tell her father, “That is going to me my next boyfriend.”  And he did become her next boyfriend.  Meghan has predatory instincts.  Meghan knows who is prey and who is catchable.  In the beginning, with the Royal Family, Meghan was playing a role of cool girl…and maintaining the fiction of a strong, powerful, know it all.  She was leader of the cult of Meghan, and she taught Harry to worship.  People have been in touch with me, people who knew Meghan when she was 12 and 13 years old…they says she was always a piece of work.  Meghan was never going to be the next Wallis Simpson because Harry never had a throne to relinquish.  She may be a low grade version of Wallis Simpson but Wallis Simpson has the distinction of a King giving up a throne for her.  Meghan never had anybody give up a throne for her.  Meghan is known for milking a throne for all it was worth and for moving to America and trying to be half in half out, but QEII spoiled that plan.

Lady C, do you think Meghan is trying to create some crisis within the Royal Family so she can exploit it to her advantage and if so, what advantage and what crisis?  Meghan is a provocateur.  She has been provoking from the word go.  She went into the relationship with Harry with her eyes and legs wide open (this is per Meghan and Harry own admissions).  Meghan decided that she was going to have the fruits of all her labor delivered to her by The Royal Family.  I do not think she was trying to create a crisis.  I think she was trying to provoke a rupture within the Royal Family and she succeeded.  In fact, she was actively trying to prevent a crisis within The Royal Family in terms of her commercial activities, abuse of staff, her bad behavior and her misconduct on official duties.  Meghan did not want to face the consequences from the Royal Family so she decided to get out.  But she would have left anyway because she wanted to make money.  It was QEII refusal to allow her to exploit the Sussex Royal website which Meghan had setup with everything being trademarked in anticipation of them moving to America.  Being told “no” provoked a crisis and Meghan responded nastily and negatively.  Then she decided to play the victim card.  I think today, Meghan is trying to provoke a reaction from the Royal Family, and to date I haven’t seen one adverse reaction.  The Royal Family has been very measured in how they dealt with Harry and Meghan.  They allowed Meghan and Harry to hang themselves with their own rope and watched as they strangled themselves of every ounce of goodwill they had been presenting to the public.  The Royal Family has been very adept at side stepping negative consequences.  The only thing they have not been able to sidestep is the public desire for a rapid solution.  Anyone with a family member who has personality disorders and drug use know the problems are always going to be ongoing. 

Lady C, did Meghan’s marriage to Trevor get her the part on Suits?  Also could you expand on how her ego and feelings of entitlement caused friction with the Canadian Chef.  I have heard it both ways (that she got it on her own and that Trevor helped her).  But either way, she did get the part because they saw in her the impertinent, uppity, entitled Rachel Zane pushing her way forward, using her wiles at every turn.  They saw that Meghan was ideal to play Rachel Zane.  And according to all reports, Meghan got that part expanded to the extent she was able to and then we all saw Meghan and Rachel Zane morph into the same creature.  I know she had huge resentment for Trevor because he wasn’t helping her to get enough auditions.  Don’t forget it took Trevor years to marry Meghan…she kept him around, using him to get ahead for a long time, pretending she loved him. Then one day, she ended it.  As soon as Meghan was in Toronto, she used Cory Vitiello to get in with The Mulroney’s and Trudeau’s.  They were Cory’s connection.    People who knew Meghan at this time, said Meghan was flagrant.  She would demand the best table at every restaurant, expecting people to know she was on Suits, even though most people didn’t know about that show.  After a while, Cory became embarrassed by Meghan’s conduct and wanted to move on from her.  Around this same time, Meghan met Harry while she was with Cory. 

Lady C has one tear left eye for Meghan’s latest flop, Cookie Queens.  Lady C thinks people were turned off by Meghan’s opportunism in attaching herself to this project.

Lady C, what do you think of Harry’s purported monthly visits back to the UK?  Do you feel the monarchy is slowly integrating Harry back into the Royal fold to prevent the shock of public resistance to the idea, sort of like how Queen Camilla was integrated in,  or is this all Harry just putting out feelers of his own hopes?  Charles’ campaign to bring Camilla into the Royal family was because Charles loved her and his relationship with her was non-negotiable, because he was not willing to exclude her from his life.  This is not the same thing as Charles reincorporating Harry back into his life when nobody else wants Harry in their lives.  None of them trust Harry – Charles, Camilla, William and Catherine – they do not trust Harry.  The idea that Charles is drip feeding Harry back into Royal life is ludicrous.  If Charles wanted to bring Harry back into Royal life, it wouldn’t have been a 47 minute meeting with Meghan excluded for most of it.  It would have been something warm and cozy.  They are not trying to bring Harry and Meghan back in.  Nobody wants them back in, even Harry and Meghan don’t want back in.  What Harry and Meghan want is the appearance of Royal Life, so they can commercialize the link in the USA and elsewhere.  Meghan doesn’t want back in.  They made her acutely uncomfortable.  All those people with integrity.  Do you have any idea how threating integrity is to a fraud and a phony? 

Lady C, do you think Meghan will resent Lili if she turns out to be better looking than Meghan is?  You can depend on it.  If Lili turns out to be good looking, Meghan will exploit it and Meghan will also punish Lili for it.  I have heard Lili is a nice looking child. Meghan will be envious of her own daughter.  Meghan is an attention seeking junkie.  Lili may be deceived for a long time of the machinations of Meghan, and may not understand what is happening.  I am not a fortune teller and I make no predictions, but Meghan always must be the center of attention.  You can see her fury when she is not the center of attention.  There are so many videos and photos of her mask slipping when the attention is not on her.  Meghan juts her jaw, full of tension and shows us her Charles Manson eyes.  Meghan Markle was never naturally good looking, but after all the work she did to her nose, teeth, and hair, I thought she was attractive.  I never thought she was a great beauty.  I think she has become less attractive, but that may just be my recognition.  People now find her less attractive because they know who she is and they see her for who she is.  And because people don’t like Meghan, people can no longer see her as attractive.

Toodles Sinners!

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Lady C Tea YouTube 8/14/26 - The "Meghan Markle thinks she earned the right to be a monster" Edition - a few nuggets paraphrased by me

Greetings from Castle Goring,   LOL as per usual there is much ado about nothing.  Little did we know, when Harry married Meghan, she would be curating in and starring in the Royal version of the Truman Show.  And now, people want answers to what is going on….. because even though they know it is chaotic, engineered,  and stupid, they still know these things should not be happening and they want to know why.

Lady C, I wonder if Meghan was not prepared to cope with fame?  All the steps she took to get the fame paid off but the power destroyed her.    Usually, any major adjustments in life requires time to adjust properly.  When Meghan got married, she ceased to be a single person and became a wife.  Then she had sudden fame.  And then she had motherhood.  Meghan had a few gears to her fame.  She became a minor cast member on Suits, but portrayed herself as the star of Suits.  She bigged up that role for all it was worth.  Then she bigged up herself.  There are stories of her booking herself into hotels under an alias even though nobody had ever heard of her.  There are stories of Meghan abusing hotel staff when she was on freebies, because she thinks her freebies are not good enough.  I know people in Canada who knew that Meghan was very disliked when on Suits.  But it all worked because she got Harry.  And Meghan did what many people with personality disorders do.  She jettisoned all life lessons when she became Royal.  She jettisoned positivity for the raw exercise of power.  But the red flags were always there.  Meghan thinking her goodie bags weren’t good enough.  Meghan’s abuse of people.  Meghan’s failing is that she is an egotistical monster and it is destroying her.  Meghan does not have good character.  But Meghan doesn’t understand any of this.  She can’t understand that people see her for the monstrosity that she is.  Meghan views her behavior as entitlements.  She thinks she worked hard for the right to mistreat people. 

Lady C, I suppose Meghan should milk it for all its worth.  She won’t have much to write home about when William becomes King.   Evidently, she thinks she can brazen it out.  Harry knows differently.  Let’s wait and see what happens.  William may be several years away from the throne. Meghan is milking it for all its worth – but nothing she is doing is working.  Harry and Meghan are seriously worried about their finances.  They are worried about their ability to earn money to fund their way of life.  They are worried about their ever-decreasing popularity.  Meghan is worried about the Juliet part of Romeo and Juliet is no longer convincing and Harry isn’t playing ball the way she would like.  Is Harry playing ball elsewhere??????  LOL……

Lady C, is it true that Harry plans to tour Eton to make sure it is safe for Prince George?  Harry is totally full of it.  Do you remember when he said he went to visit the Queen to make sure she was surrounded by the right people?  As if he had any say about who would be surrounding the Queen.  Do you remember that?  Harry is making an ass of himself, and he is doing it again.  First of all,  Eton understands that Harry was somewhat of a disgrace to them.  He caused a lot of trouble for them, including legally. Secondly, they understand if they have Prince George there, they will never admit Archie.  Thirdly, everyone at Eton, everyone surrounding Eton and everyone who had anything to do with anything knows that Harry has absolutely no say whatsoever with William and his children.  So, if Harry is planting stories that he wants to be a guardian of his nephew’s interest…..he doesn’t even know his nephew any longer.  There is no interaction between the two families and it is my understanding this will continue as long as the status quo remains which is that Harry is married to Meghan and Harry does drugs. Everybody knows what they are dealing with.  Catherine is Patron of a charity about mental health and drug addiction.  The idea that Harry who is drug addled and a total mess would have anything to do with Eton is crazy.  I doubt Eton would even give Harry a platform to even discuss George because that would upset William and Catherine. I suspect this is another fantasy story coming out of Montecito. 

Toodles Sinners!

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Lady C Tea YouTube 8/11/26 - The "David Foster doesn't like Meghan Markle" Edition - a few nuggets paraphrased by me

Greetings from Castle Goring,

This Redditor’s note:  Aurora was sitting with Lady C on her sofa and I think they are comforting each other over the loss of Mickie.  Someone sent Lady C roses with no card and she thanked that person.

Lady C, Mark Dolan has stated that Harry’s new love interest’s name is Cindy and that she is a singer and they have a strong connection together.  I hope she will make him happy and not as angry and bitter as he is now.  As you know, I like Mark Dolan and have appeared on his show many times when he was with GB news.  Beyond what I have already said, I am not going to get involved other than to say, “good luck.”

Lady C, Katherine McPhee is very talented in her own right, and it would seem that Meghan didn’t give her the time of day until she married David Foster.  I think they went to the same school together but were not in the same class.  She was not invited to Meghan’s wedding.   I have heard something about this.  David Foster doesn’t like Meghan.  He sees her for what she is.  He tolerates her.  David Foster who is very bright, once felt affection for Harry, but now that has petered out.  At this point, it is considered mutually advantageous relationship.   David Foster wanted to bring attention to his foundation.

Lady C, Harry and Meghan have nothing to do with the David Foster Foundation, yet Harry and Meghan were there front and center.  Make it make sense.  Evidently the foundation has a low score.  There is a lot of money in the foundation just sitting there and the foundation doesn’t share information, but the foundation has done good things even with its limitations.  I was asked why the foundation exists at all when here is free health care in Canada, and I do not know the answer.  What I do know is that nobody had heard of the Foundation and now people do, so I think David Foster used them to get press coverage for his event.  I did hear at some point, David Foster was annoyed with Meghan exploiting him at the event.

Lady C talks about the school Immaculate Heart that Meghan attended and said that the school had many attendees on mixed race and non-white race.  She thinks Meghan got some of her racist beliefs from her mother Doria.  If you listened to how Doria spoke on the Netflix show, Doria seems to believe that anything could be perceived as racist.  But Meghan was less privileged than many of her classmates and this could be what put yet another chip on her shoulder and contribute to her massive inferiority complex. Lady C said that Meghan needed to sort all this out in therapy and instead we are seeing her disorders being sorted out on the World Stage.

Lady C, if an international newspaper were to print (with receipts), facts of the surrogate births and facts of THAT wife’s past, along with the Royal Family’s continued cover ups for Harry, would this foreign paper be able to be sued since it wasn’t published in the UK?  You are making assumptions that need to be pegged into reality.  First of all, what you think are facts must be proven with evidence.  Anything that can be proven to be true is a defense to defamation.  There is a huge difference, legally from fact, speculation and rumor.  In the USA, there is a higher standard for celebrities and politicians.  You have to prove malice.   If you can’t prove malice, a celebrity cannot win a defamation lawsuit in the USA.  In the UK, you have to prove whatever you said is true.  There is sufficient freedom of press today for people to determine what is going on.  It is not always perfect, but it is sufficient.

Toodles Sinners!

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Lady C Tea YouTube 8/8/26-8/10/26 - The "Lady C is totally ready for Meghan to sue her" Edition - Sit back for these multiple days of nuggets paraphrased by me

Greetings from Castle Goring,

This Redditor’s note:  Lady C’s beloved dog Mickie has passed away suddenly and peacefully on 8/8/26.  Lady C has tears in her eyes from the loss.  Anyone with fur babies knows the loss of a pet is like the loss of a family member, and I feel so bad for Lady C….RIP sweet Mickie.  Lady C is one tough lady because I would not have been able to carry on and make a video under the strain of grief. 

Lady C, what do you think about the reports in New Idea that you have gotten under Meghan’s skin and she wants Harry to sue you?  I am not sure how I could have possibly gotten under Meghan’s skin when she never reads what anybody says about her.  We have her own account of this.  Surely, she could not be lying about that?????  New Idea is like The Enquirer.  Every once is a while, they have a solid story but most of the time it is “column filling.”  I am supremely unbothered by a report like this.  If you sue someone, you have to have a reason for suing.  Harry and Meghan now have a track record of issuing frivolous lawsuits they are now decreasingly able to get away with.  What is she going to sue me for?  For observing on the 14^(th) of January 2019 the baby bump managed to be captured by Getty news photographers dove from her abdomen to her knees?  There is nothing she can sue me for.  And if she tries, then we will end up in a court of law and she and Harry will have to testify.  I am supremely unworried.  According to the story in New Idea, Harry thinks it would be a mistake to take me on.  I really don’t care. 

Lady C says The Sussex Squad is clever to try to make the point that as the leader of the military, King Charles should attend the Invictus Games.  But Lady C says the squaddies are neutralized because they are nonstop complaining about something.  Lady C does not think The King will feel pressure to attend The Invictus Games.  Too many people now associate the Invictus Games with the toxic duo, Harry and Meghan.

Lady C, the fact that Meghan Markle gets invited to dinner parties were true A-Listers like Martha Stewart attends tell me some people still tolerate her.  Martha is a supporter of The King so told us that Meghan let slip details about The King, then Meghan uses her propaganda arm, People Magazine that Martha, at 85, is confused.  Meghan is so brazen.  I would never have a go at Martha.  They also had a go at Elon Musk via their website.  They are playing with fire.  Well, paramaniacal children not only play with matches, they like to play with fire, and sometimes they don’t do a Ryan Reynolds and burn down the school.  They burn themselves.  I thought this was petty, yet so typical, of Meghan to make this move.  And don’t forget Meghan also made the comment that they were seated nowhere near each other.  Actually, this shows me that Meghan is not only a street fighter, she is a gutter snipe.  Martha Stewart at 85 fires on more cylinders than Meghan will ever be able to.  Elon Musk is a genius but also a controversial figure.  Lots of people like to have a go at Elon Musk.

Lady C, I really hope Meghan sues you.  She would be forced to tell the truth and waste millions of dollars.  Let me tell you this.  I have a wonderful legal team prepared for all contingences.  I do not blink.  If Meghan and Harry think Paul Dacre was tough, they have never seen this Tigress in action.  What Paul Dacre did not maul, I will annihilate.  I don’t want to get sued, but I am not afraid.    I have an army of people who will help me make them pay in every way.

Lady C, I think Meghan’s clapback on your story (threatening to sue) about Harry’s lady friend only tells me that it is true.  Everything she does ends up confirming everything she wishes to deny.  You have to give Meghan credit for being a nobody who married into the British Royal Family.  That was an accomplishment that has been superseded tenfold by total stupidity, total lack of awareness, total self destructiveness,  and being so over ambitious, and so in love with yourself that you went from being one half of one of the most popular couples on Earth to one half of one of the least popular couples on Earth in just a few years.  And, everything she does to counteract a single story makes her look even more ridiculous.  But if her primary objective is to get attention on a daily basis, even if it is bad attention, then she is succeeding.  I don’t think someone as ego driven as Meghan sets out to be one of the most reviled women on Earth, Meghan calls it trolled.  But the fact of the matter is Meghan has put herself in this position with her own behavior.   I know that people say Meghan has an apartment in Hollywood and Harry has rooms somewhere in Montecito but the information I have received comes from extremely credible people in the United States of America.  I know Meghan and Harry thought they were in the perfect position to have The King welcome them into the Royal fold before this story blew up in their faces.

Lady C, I bet Meghan watches your channel.  She is one of the most angry people in the World.  She thought people were going to bow down to Princess Meghan and instead 75% of the people think she is an evil psychopath.  When Meghan spoke, her beauty faded.  Meghan is not unattractive in certain poses.  But now, no matter how good the photograph is, people see ugliness, they see nastiness, they see venom.  I have been assured by people who have known Meghan since childhood, that Meghan was always an angry and nasty child.  One of the social workers who interacted with Meghan thought that Meghan suffered as a result of her mother being on a long, extended stay elsewhere.  Meghan did attend private schools and had access to privilege. but certain people I spoke to thought Meghan suffered embarrassment over her racial identity and her mother’s very long absence.  The reason why social services were involved was to assist Meghan and the family in reincorporating Meghan’s mother back into the family after her long absence.  This is all verifiable.  So yes, when Meghan married Harry, she thought she could crook her finger, and everyone would do what she wanted.  She thought she had “arrived.”  Can you imagine her horror when she realized marrying Harry did not convey the power that she thought it would?  That it would not be an automatic assurance of success?  And then all of this explodes in her face.  Meghan doesn’t blame herself for misplaying her hand.   She blames the people she should not have blamed, then plays the race card and calls people who are not racist….racist.   And do you see how Meghan’s treats people who are not important to her?  Like gum on the bottom of someone’s shoe.  And she didn’t get away with it.  It’s all rather sad if you think about it.  This is what happens when a disordered personality enters an ordered environment.  They seek to create havoc and it all boomerangs back onto the person. 

Lady C proceeds to issue a statement that she has not attacked Neil Sean.  She just stands by her reporting and sources about Harry’s alleged lady friend.  Lady C says she will not address this subject further.   So sinners, Lady C has withdrawn from the Mexican standoff and since she is in mourning for her pupper, I think this is a good idea.

Lady C, correct me if I am wrong but the Royal Family celebrate the military all year long.   And they support many organizations all year long.  Invictus is a private organization that caters to very few actual Veterans participating.  I do not think The King is obligated to do anything more than he already is.  It is my feeling that is would a huge mistake for The King to get involved in this and it would reverberate back to him in a big way.  But the Press have to get involved in this, so they will bore us for the next year to speculate on this.  We live in an interesting World where lack of logic and last of reason seem to be more and more tolerated.

Lady C, can Harry be banished from returning to the UK if he doesn’t pay his debts?  Sadly no.  We are not living in the good old days where people can be banished from entering their home country.  If Harry doesn’t pay his debts, there are clear legal paths to collect from him…bankrupting him.  I would support the Associated Newspapers whole heartedly if they went after Harry to pay his debts.  The King cannot remove Harry’s British Citizenship, but he can remove his title of Prince and his style of His Royal Highness.

 

Toodles Sinners!

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Lady C Tea YouTube 8/6/26 - Lady C asks, "Do I look like a Sucker?" and says, "Meghan Markle Will Say Anything to Stay in the News" Edition - a few nuggets paraphrased by me

Greetings from Castle Goring, today we have controversial ground to cover and I will not shy away from it.  I know there are those of you on the Internet who love a squabble.

Lady C, you were Markled over that girlfriend story.  SMH.  I do not know what SMH means, sorry.  You think I was Markled?  First of all, I never said she was his girlfriend.  I said Harry was in love with her and she was in love with him.  That is not quite the same thing as boyfriend and girlfriend.  You are entitled to your opinion to say I have been Markled.  Let me put it this way – I do not agree with you and let’s leave it at that.

Lady C, do you think the Harkles planted this information to discreet you?  It is just one person who gave you information.    I am 76 years old and have had a 50 year career.  Of course I considered the possibility this information may not be accurate.  I have had very few cases where I reported information that is inaccurate.  Do I look like a sucker?   I think you are making an assumption that just one person gave me this information.  I will not confirm or deny your assumption.  If you were a writer, you would understand better how these things work.  I have not reported every detail I was told.  I have withheld many details to protect my sources.   I am not accountable to you.  I am accountable to myself and my reputation.

Lady C, Neil Sean has stated 100% that the Montecito PR team has planted this story to deflect from all of Harry’s bad press the last few weeks.  Thank you for letting me know.  I would like to make the point that anybody has the right to comment, no matter how mistaken they are, including the journalist you mentioned.  I didn’t listen to what he said, and I do not intend to.  I prefer to keep myself autonomous and I don’t listen to what other commentators say.  Neil Sean is entitled to his opinions.  What he is not entitled to do is make himself an expert over what I was told.  He cannot be an expert on what I was told when he doesn’t know who told me what, nor does anybody else.  Anybody beating the drum from a vantage point of ignorance doesn’t know what they are talking about.  All I can tell you is I regard my sources as reliable.  Anybody is at liberty to accept it or reject it.  Neil Sean does not know who my source is, so he is not in a position to discredit it.  Many journalists and royal correspondents set themselves up as far more knowledgeable than they really are.  I am not trying to start a feud with anybody.  I wish I had a pound for every “royal correspondent” or “hack” who claims to know better than me, who claims to have the “inside track,” and shooting off their mouth about how ignorant I am and how knowledable they are, I would be significantly richer than I am.

Lady C, did Meghan plant the story that she planted the story?  Now that is an interesting question.  Are you asking me if Neil Sean has been duped?  I know I have not been duped.

Lady C, what do you make of Meghan cosplaying Diana jumping into a pool carrying balloons and wearing dark sunglasses?  Who jumps into a pool carrying balloons?  Why is she obsessed with balloons?  I saw the photograph.  I want you all to know that Diana was a very good diver, let’s remember that Meghan jumped.  I suspect that balloons are a contrivance.  Meghan suffers from arrested development.  Maybe when she was 9 years old, the balloons were the ultimate for her and at 45 she still thinks this.  But to jump off a diving board that is evocative of your mother-in-law, with dark glasses and balloons, it is obvious what her aim is.  Attention.  She wants everyone talking about her and she succeeded.  She was probably terrified to dive in headfirst, because then all the hair of the Turkish virgins would have separated from her scalp and would have floated away.  I have never heard of jumping in a pool wearing sunglasses because they would fall off or hurt your face.  Meghan is tacky.  It’s all so tacky.  Meghan thinks she is beautiful and glamorous, but she is not.

Lady C, do you think Meghan enjoys the speculation of Harry finding a new love?  Do you think Meghan enjoys the speculation that Lili is born of a surrogate?  I do not think Meghan enjoys the speculation that Harry has found a new love.  I know she did not plant the story.  Nobody associated with her planted the story.  I am sure Meghan is mortified that the story has gotten out.  I am sure Meghan hates the story that Harry is possibly no longer worshiping her.  I think Meghan DOES enjoy the speculation about Archie and Lili.  This is a sick scenario when a person enjoys this type of speculation because it is topical, it is keeping her in the news.  Meghan will say and do anything to keep herself in the news.  She will say and do anything to discredit people who do not deserve to be discredited, and of course I am referring to the Royal Family, her father and her sister.

Lady C, does Harry have a diplomatic Visa to remain in the USA?  Who would approve his diplomatic visa?  Harry, as son of the sovereign, would be entitled to diplomatic status.  This is very common within diplomatic circles of many countries that family members receive diplomatic status.

Lady C, Robert Hardman and Rebecca English were on Palace Confidential discussing whether Harry would ever inherit a property from Charles.  They hesitated on Sandringham.  What do you think?  Highgrove is on a 75-year lease personally to the King, but it is run on a commercial basis from the Duchy of Cornwall and the chances of Charles willing this to Harry are remote (to be polite) because it is William’s duchy.  Balmoral and Sandringham are the private residences of the Monarch and will go to William.   I could see him purchasing a separate property for Harry.  I am baffled by all these rubbish speculations, and then the speculations are treated as facts.  The idea that the Monarch would give any of his private properties to Harry is ridiculous. 

Lady C, surely the forging of the Gavin Burrows document is a criminal offense?  Yes, it absolutely is and Anjlee Sangani authenticated this document.  I do not know to what extent Justice Nicklin intends to pursue this.  I know Justice Nicklin understands this involves the King’s son, members of the bar, and leading celebrities.  It is quite a hot potato and only time will tell if anything will happen on this.  This is extraordinary (not ordinary) case.  I could understand why Justice Nicklin would not do anything.  The UK is hardly a beacon of stability, and this case could bring down institutions. 

Toodles Sinners!

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Mexican Standoff Update - Lady C has fighting words for those who doubt her source about Harry’s Lady Friend.

u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Lady C Tea YouTube 8/5/26 - The "Will Megsy Baby Be Wearing Her 4th Rate Jewelry When Justice Nicklin Gives His Next Ruling?" Edition - a few nuggets paraphrased by me

Greetings from Castle Goring,

Lady C, Harry’s star witness, refused to testify to the wrong things they were attributing to him.  Do you think this jeopardizes the claimant's insurance?  I think this is a very good question.  One of my good friends is one of the top guys at Lloyd’s.  I find it almost inconceivable that any insurance would have covered that lot of claimants if they had known the entire case was predicated on a witness statement that the witness himself was saying was fraudulent.  This is a story that will run and run and run.  It is not going to die any time soon.  Let’s remember – Sherborne, according to Harry in the book Spare, orchestrated this whole thing with Elton John in the summer of 2019.  How do you issue proceedings after your main witness says his statement is a fraud?  I am not sure that not only the insurance is in jeopardy.  I think Harry will be shielded because he is the King’s son.  I am not so sure the other claimants and Sherborne will be shielded if there is evidence the entire case was built on a known fraud.  I think ANL and the other newspaper companies will have some merit in going for the jugular with all the lawyers involved.  And did the claimants know this evidence was fraud?  This opens all kinds of questions.   I will say this one thing, someone at the senior insurer’s may not want to rock the boat with the monarchy….and perhaps in three year’s time, someone will whisper to someone on the honors committee, that perhaps someone is worthy of a peerage.

Lady C tells a viewer that the Judge Nicklin ruling on fees will be issued the week of August 17^(th) which is her birthday!  Of course, Lady knows is not the only person born in August.  Maybe Megsy Baby will get a really delicious birthday present from Justice Nicklin.  Her wrists are going to be spared all of the arduousness of needing to wear any of the 4^(th) rate bracelets from Cartier and Van Cleef, etc…because practically nothing Meghan wears is first rate.  Isn’t there a reason why some people call her CarParkle?   We don’t have that long to wait.  Can you imagine the overuse of the 16 bathrooms in Montecito right now?  I hear that Meghan and Harry are doing something along likes of $hitting bricks and are terrified and I don’t know why…the writing on the wall is they are going to get sufficient just desserts.

Lady C comments how lovely the Wales family is and how wonderful they were last weekend at the Commonwealth Games.  Lady C thinks Carlotte is Catherine and Princess Anne combined.  She thinks George is in line with how he should be.  And Louis is slightly mischievous.  Lady comments that Megsy baby no longer gets the coverage that the Wales family get.  The Wales family is an outstanding example of Royalty at its best for our modern times.  We are so fortunate to have such a beautiful, well adjusted, well presented, and not dull family representing the Monarchy.

Lady C, even if Harry was found to have committed a crime, the Royal Family would do nothing about.  Let’s be honest…LOL  I did not say Harry committed a crime.  I said Harry was part of a criminal enterprise.  Harry says he believed he had a winnable and viable case.  If Sherbourne says to Harry that he felt the case was still strong without the Burrows evidence, then Harry still had not done anything wrong.  If David Sherbourne pressed on with the case, knowing the evidence was false or missing, he is the problem.  I still stand by my statements in 2020 that Harry and Meghan need to be charged with a crime before the family would get involved and strip titles.  Being suckered into a criminal enterprise is not a crime.

Lady C, do you think the King sent Meghan a birthday card?  No. Megsy Baby and Harry are having a hard time spinning the 47-minute visit that Harry was primarily part of.  They need that connection to spin to Netflix to get more money.  But, if Harry decides to go the route of, “Mummy was murdered because she was going to marry a Muslim,” with Netflix then Harry will be faced even further consequences for his treachery.  I am not sure Netflix would even pay them enough money that it would be worth it.  Something has to give.  They cannot maintain their lifestyle unless they are high earners and they can’t be high earners anymore, and more treachery will continue to yield even less returns.

Lady C, I think I know why the King evicted Harry from Frogmore Cottage.  It keeps Harry out of Windsor for William, and it allows him to give Harry a grand country estate later on like Bagshot Park or Gatcome Park later on.  That way, when Harry returns, he can return to his own estate.  I found this comment interesting.  As far as I am aware, this action was taken by Clive Alderton.  Harry was deprived of Frogmore Cottage because William and people surrounding The Crown felt that Harry and Meghan should not have easy access to William and his children.  Harry and Meghan could have simply walked over to their house.  Now that Harry has nowhere, it does open the question and I do think the question is valid.  Normally, children of the monarch ARE gifted a house.  There is a long tradition of children and grandchildren given houses, and I think this is as it ought to be.  I think any criticism of this practice is mean and nasty.  I think if the King felt it was appropriate to buy Harry a country house, I see nothing wrong with this.  There is ample precedent for this.  The King didn’t need to evict Harry from Frogmore Cottage to find an excuse to buy Harry a house.  This topic has never come up before…let’s see how long it takes for Rebecca English to bring this up and say the idea is hers.

Toodles Sinners!

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Lady C Tea YouTube 8/4/26 - The "Marrying Prince Harry is the Greatest Acting Gig Meghan Markle Ever Got" Edition - a few nuggets paraphrased by me

Greetings from Castle Goring,  I tell you the older I get the more I am amazed at how easy people are to believe anything.  No wonder Meghan has been so successful.  She married a man she could easily dupe, but she also has a whole World believing her lies.

Lady C, it appears that Harry wants King Charles to officiate at Invictus Birmingham.  Good luck to Charles if he accommodates Harry and Meghan’s Birmingham show.  What could possibly go wrong?  Being booed?  An empty stadium?  The public wants Harry removed from Invictus.  Yes.  And not only the public wants Harry removed.  Some people at Invictus want Harry removed from Invictus.  But it has yet to happen.  Of course this whole thing is another plant from Harry and Meghan.  Wishful thinking.  They manifest into the media.  The whole thing is preposterous.  First of all, Royal diaries are not agreed a year in advance.  Harry knows this.  Even Meghan has to know this.  What could possibly go wrong?  Could you imagine the King showing up, so that Harry and Meghan can crow to the rest of the world how they have control over The King. 

Lady C, I find it astounding that people seem to expect King Charles and Prince William to get along 100% of the time.  I mean, relationships like that do not exist unless you are living on the land of DeluLu.  You have hit the nail on the head.  There are a lot of people, particularly the media, who want people to believe that if Charles and William disagree on anything, this means they are at daggers drawn and there will be blood in the streets!

Lady C, Harry’s first wife has now been saying she wasn’t treated very well on her recent visit to the UK.  She never shuts up.  No, she doesn’t.  In fairness to her, she was treated with contempt.  She was made to understand what her place is and if she forgets it, there will be more painful lessons to be learned.  The whole exercise was one of humiliation.  Not only was she kept waiting, and somehow the World was made to know she was kept waiting.  I don’t think that leak came from Meghan. This wasn’t a Palace leak; this was a leak of a loyal Royal supporter.  Meghan would love to have spun a different tale of how that visit went, and I suspect this is why the information was leaked.  A preemptive strike?

Lady C, having worked with several special needs children, I really wonder if Meghan has FASD.  Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder.  We don’t know about Doria’s past.  Meghan has several characteristics that I have seen before.  Something is not right.  I was gob smacked when I read this.  I hadn’t considered this and I should have.  I have experience with someone who has FASD and it was a slap in the face when I read this comment because it is possible that Meghan could be a victim of this.  She exhibits all the signs that are characteristic of it.  According to the Markles, Doria drank alcohol, smoked weed and smoked crack when she was pregnant with Meghan.  This is not unknown.  The family has told me this.  The rage.  The flagrance.  The disregard for what happened 2 minutes ago.  The victimhood.  Yes, these are all characteristics of other personality disorders but also FASD.  There are serious forms of FASD and slighter forms.  I would consider this a definite possibility.

Lady C, whether or not The King has the upper hand in this interminable game, it took him 4 years to gain it, this shows him to be a pretty poor negotiator.  I think he is frightened of Meghan’s tiny bit of African heritage.  Let’s remember, the game plan was not set by KCIII, it was set by QEII, and the Queen was terrified that anybody would play the color card.  Both QEII and KCIII were terrified of the color card and the reaction of The Commonwealth, and Meghan knew it and used it to her advantage.  Remember, Meghan used the color card with Jason Knauf to get him to announce her relationship with Harry in the first place.  William is less terrified of the color card, interestingly enough.  He is aware of the danger of it, you will recall that William threw Susan Hussey under the bus when Ngozi Fulani made accusations.  William is ruthless and decisive, and in that moment, he was able to save his Earthshot Prize.  Under the circumstances, William’s decisiveness should be admired.  Charles still worries about what people in the Commonwealth think.  And the fact of the matter is, most people in The Commonwealth do not think The Royal Family is racist.  I think Charles’ fears are misplaced.

Lady C, Meghan’s marriage is the biggest acting gig she ever got.  She performs constantly. And let it be said that most people with her personality disorders are constantly acting because they have no actual personalities.  They are not sincere and it takes a long time for people around them to figure out they are phony.  My understanding is that Meghan has been acting out what she knew would hook Harry from the word “go.”  Some of it is not acting. Meghan was able to assess what was needed to “land” Harry.   They analyze what works.  Meghan analyzed that what worked with Harry was to be like Diana.  Harry kept telling people he could not understand why others couldn’t see that Meghan was like Diana.  But other people could see the farce, and Harry could not see it.  Thomas Markle Sr. told me that before the wedding, Meghan was brutal to him over the phone to him and he could always tell when Harry came into the room, because Meghan would switch from cold to loving in a moment.  Meghan plays a role for Harry.  She pretends to be nicer, kinder, and sweeter with Harry than she is with everybody else.  I have been told this by people who have seen it.  Also, this was a new identity for Meghan.  She no longer had to be a cheap and vulgar hustler.  Remember, a lot of people become actors and actresses for the attention, because the attention is not something they can get in their regular lives being themselves.  The psyche doesn’t care if the applause is from one thing or the other.  Meghan’s marriage is the greatest gig of her life.  Unfortunately, she is also the director, producer, script writer, and the actress.  So, what is she doing?  Messing up left, right and center.  Why?  Most actors need direction and to be provided with a script.  Why?  Because most actors aren’t capable of being anything except someone else.  Most actors have a huge void that needs to be filled and is filled by acting.  Most people don’t have that void that needs to be filled.  Living as Meghan Markle is truly frightening.  If Meghan has FASD, along with the personality void, should we feel pity for her?  How can we feel pity for someone so destructive?  Maybe we can feel pity, but at the same time not give her a free pass. 

 

Toodles Sinners!

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago

Lady C Tea YouTube 8/2/26 - The "Meghan's new brand of spread doesn't work like her old brand of spread" Edition - a few nuggets paraphrased by me

Greetings from Castle Goring,  SMH and LOL….you can’t make any of this up.  I know I always say that but it is truly incredible that the World is being treated to such a spectacle and such outrageous behavior, but at least it is interesting so we can take that as a positive.  Let’s plunge into questions.

Lady C, I do not believe the meeting at Highgrove took place was an attempt at reconciliation.  In my opinion, Haz was summoned to Highgrove after his attack on the UK Judiciary of which his father is head.  And that was the last straw for The King.  Hopefully he was told that was the last straw.  This is an interesting perspective and not totally out of line.   Because after all the drama of “will they won’t they stay at Buckingham Palace,”  the King and Sir Clive Alderton would have wanted to get a measure of Harry or make a few points, even if only for a few seconds.  Charles always knows what is happening and what is not happening with Harry and Meghan in California (such as a blonde sashaying around Harry).  They know about Meghan failures with Netflix and As ever.   I personally think this meeting should never have happened because this would have really put them in their place.  Although a 47-minute meeting where they were made to wait, and Meghan made to wait outside.  And they were warned ahead of time there was to be no leaking otherwise there would be consequences.  Who leaked that the meeting was 47 minutes and Meghan was made to wait outside?  Did Meghan do that?  Or did the Palace leak this so the World would know what is going on?  And let’s not forget there have been a lot of leaks recently.  Harry and his newfound interest in Kant vs Schopenhauer and Meghan discussing the merits of Chapter 11 vs Total Bankruptcy?  So much is going on, including the opportunity for Charles to see his grandchildren.  These are the same grandchildren that Meghan Markle thinks Thomas Markle has no right to see.  I wonder why Meghan doesn’t want Thomas Markle to see those children?  I agree overall, this meeting was not one of reconciliation, it was a meeting of drawn lines.  And even if Harry wants to spin tales of reconciliation, it suits the Royal Family just fine because it means Harry and Meghan are getting desperate and may be in a position to behave themselves.  They have already launched all their grenades; they have nothing left.

Lady C, why doesn’t Charles strip Harry of his titles?  What would it take to finally do this?  Charles is doing certain things.  This visit to Highgrove was a massive humiliation for Meghan and Harry and it was done in such a way that the Royal Family can deny they did anything humiliating.  The meeting at Highgrove was to show Harry and Meghan the reward for treachery.  Things are not going well financially.  They have no new money coming in.  They need the prestige and royal stardust in order to make money.  It would have worked had they not taken the route they took.  Instead, they chose victimhood when they are millionaires and two of the most privileged people on Earth.  Charles needs to be very careful.  Harry and Meghan are affiliated with anti-monarchists on both sides of the Atlantic and Charles doesn’t want to spark any conversations in which Parliament debates whether there should be a monarchy at all.  I think Harry’s attack on the judiciary is enough to remove Harry from the Royal Website and strip his titles, but the King is being careful and no doubt he knows Harry will continue to hang himself with his own rope.  Harry’s actions are harming the King and Charles knows that if Parliament gets involved, Harry bad behavior could actually be a dagger used to stab Charles.  Parliament is full of anti-monarchists.

Lady C, if Harry has a new lady companion, why did Meghan visit the King?  All the more reason to visit.  Aside from the fact that “As ever” is showing that is really is “Was never and never will be,” and will cost them a lot of money.  Meghan can spread the spread around all she wants but the reality is this spread isn’t working like the previous brand of spread that Meghan used.  Meghan’s previous brand of spread managed to entice Trevor Engleson, Cory Vitello, Rory Mcllroy, and Harry.  The new spread isn’t working.  Meghan needs the royal connection.  This was a major reason to organize the visit.  They always intended to do a refresher of the Royal connection.  It has been years since Meghan visited.  I think after Harry’s attack on Judge Nicklin, The King should have cancelled the visit, but the King didn’t want to be accused of harming their commercial opportunities to make money.  Charles has blocked Harry from demanding money from him.  The timing wasn’t ideal for Charles.

Lady C, Harry is the King’s son.  He won’t pay.  What are they going to do?  Arrest him?  Harry is not impervious to arrest.  Only The King is above the law.  Harry can be done just like any other debtor in the country.  ANL is not going to give Harry any breaks.  They are very bitter that Harry used his Royal Status to rope in Doreen Lawrence and to abuse them.  The information I have is that Harry and Meghan are very worried and tearing their hair out.  Well, Meghan is tearing out the hair of Turkish virgins all the way to the knots.  I have been told that Charles and William think Harry should be accountable for his own mess. Harry is on his own.  If Harry goes bust, then Harry goes bust.  I do not understand why so many people think The King will bail out Harry.  Harry was warned by QEII, Charles and William that it was in his best interest and that monarchy’s best interest that The Crown needs a free press.  Harry ignored them to slay dragons and make money.  It worked for a while but now Harry has so traduced his own Royal status that it is like he doesn’t even have it anymore.  Now, people realize Harry and Meghan are dangerous and will not give them any wiggle room.

 

Toodles Sinners!

PS… Lady C mentioned twice about Harry discovering Kant and Schopenhauer ….Is Harry’s blonde lady love into philosophy?????  Or is Lady C trying to tell us that Harry is torn between two realities?  I fear this may be over the head of this Redditor.

reddit.com
u/daisybeach23 — 2 months ago