Meghan’s Geneva speech used the same arguments published by medical expert Dr Dana Suskind
Posting for KilnTime.
Controversial portions of Meghan Markle's speech in Switzerland for the Lost Screens memorial were plagarized from an article written by Dr. Dana Suskind and published in The Chicago Tribune on April 30, 2026, days before Meghan's speech.
Specifically, Dr. Suskind, who was writing about the dangers of AI in social media and the inadequate response from social media platforms (and who quoted research showing that economically disadvantaged families were more concerned with physical threats than social media threats) wrote:
“We would never accept a food safety system that required parents to individually test every product for toxins before feeding it to their child. Instead, we regulate the food supply.
“We would never accept a policy that ensured car safety for wealthy children but not their low-income peers. Instead, we require car seats and seatbelts. We don’t outsource public health to individual families.
“And make no mistake: The potential developmental harms of AI slop are a public health concern. Rather than leaving it up to parents to navigate this risk (or not) on their own, we need universal, platform-level solutions."
Sound familiar? Meghan used the exact same arguments in her speech.
She could have credited Dr. Suskind and actually given her speech more strength by quoting or referring to a pediatric surgeon known for her research and writing on early brain development. But then she would not have gotten the credit.
(Credit for this information goes to Lyndadavis6829, who made a comment on Tom Sykes video " The $64 Distraction" on YouTube. I just followed the breadcrumbs. Dr. Suskind's article can be read here: https://www.chicagotribune.com/2026/04/30/opinion-artificial-intelligence-ai-youtube-kids/)
