The ending of NTTD didnt ruin the franchise as some claim
I've seen a lot of people claim that Bond dying at the end of NTTD ruins the franchise and makes it impossible to go on as, yk, he died. To argue that, most people say that Bond's continuity says that it's aways the same guy, and that people wont buy when a new guy picks up the role and we get on track.
I saw a journalist on twitter today saying that NTTD was a franchise killer because killing Bond off meant that there was no way to recoup it, much like killing of all the Skywalkers in Star Wars. Here's a link to the thread: https://x.com/SCWKorsgaard/status/2107676414338081164
However, that is just dumb. I find it very hard to believe fans and the General Audience will care, be confused or wonder how come Bond is alive since he blew up in the last movie. It just doesnt make sense. For me, there hasnt been an strong timeline and continuity between actors and movies, purely because of a timeline and age issue:
How come Bond be the same guy if he is in his 30s from the 60s through the 2000s? It just doesnt make sense. Sure, there are references from other movies and Craig's movies work as a reboot timeline, but I dont think there will be a problem, purely because Bond is always recast and the fact that now he will be in his 30s, not his 50s.
What do you think?