r/JamesBond

The ending of NTTD didnt ruin the franchise as some claim

I've seen a lot of people claim that Bond dying at the end of NTTD ruins the franchise and makes it impossible to go on as, yk, he died. To argue that, most people say that Bond's continuity says that it's aways the same guy, and that people wont buy when a new guy picks up the role and we get on track.

I saw a journalist on twitter today saying that NTTD was a franchise killer because killing Bond off meant that there was no way to recoup it, much like killing of all the Skywalkers in Star Wars. Here's a link to the thread: https://x.com/SCWKorsgaard/status/2107676414338081164

However, that is just dumb. I find it very hard to believe fans and the General Audience will care, be confused or wonder how come Bond is alive since he blew up in the last movie. It just doesnt make sense. For me, there hasnt been an strong timeline and continuity between actors and movies, purely because of a timeline and age issue:

How come Bond be the same guy if he is in his 30s from the 60s through the 2000s? It just doesnt make sense. Sure, there are references from other movies and Craig's movies work as a reboot timeline, but I dont think there will be a problem, purely because Bond is always recast and the fact that now he will be in his 30s, not his 50s.

What do you think?

reddit.com
u/Beneficial-Hotel-232 — 8 days ago
▲ 481 r/JamesBond

Hot Take: Skyfall’s got my favourite scenery of modern Bond films

The time in London (especially the underground)? The toppled statues on Silvas Island? The old house paired with the wax jackets out in the middle of the countryside? Just class

Maybe even best scenery of all bond films…

u/EfficientExit4422 — 8 days ago

Make the comments look like Kara Milovy's Seach History

So a while ago, I saw people do this trend, and I want to see what you all put on here. Also wanted to put something fun, since it's my birthday, I am 26 Today.

u/Amazing-Activity-882 — 7 days ago
▲ 336 r/JamesBond

Omega Seamaster James Bond Edition

The Omega Seamaster James Bond Edition. The blue dial and mesh bracelet look absolutely amazing together. Definitely one of my favorite Seamaster designs.

u/ShaikhMohiuddin_1385 — 8 days ago
▲ 117 r/JamesBond

No Time to Die is practically a tribute film to On Her Majesty's Secret Service. If Bond 26 were to do the same, which classic would you choose to pay a similar homage to?

u/WesleyToledooo — 8 days ago
▲ 869 r/JamesBond

Sean Connery with his 17 million Lire win (roughly €243,000 in 2026) at Casino de la Vallee, Saint-Vincent, Italy, January 8, 1963

u/NomadSound — 9 days ago

What does Bond mean to you?

A simple question with a complex answer, or a complex question with a simple answer?

On October 5th, 1962, the world was introduced to Sean Connery’s James Bond. It was the dawn of a new age, the birth of a franchise that would quickly go on to earn its place amongst the greatest in the history of film. It’s an undying, monolithic force to be reckoned with, and–
No, that’s not quite right, not quite right at all. Cambridge Dictionary defines Monolithic as “too large, too regular, or without interesting differences, and unwilling or unable to be changed”. The majority of this description can not be further from the truth. In fact, let me repeat it just once more, for extra emphasis.

“too large, too regular, or without interesting differences, and unwilling or unable to be changed”

Bond is, even in this long period of change and uncertainty, a worldwide phenomenon. Does that mean it is “too large”? Can a franchise or a character be too large? While I entirely think that calling it large is the only part of that definition that accurately describes the presence of the franchise, I think the only part of it that is toolarge is the prices on the official merchandise store. It is what it is (massive) because of what it is (successful), and I think describing its size as excessive would mean ignoring the work that went into getting it to such a point.

To call the Bond franchise “too regular or without interesting differences” would be to define regular as innovative, or to have little understanding of the characteristics of the franchise at all. Hell, the films do not even behave in a regular manner in regards to themselves, as if there was no blueprint or history at all. Look at the ending of Octopussy, where we see Moore’s Bond donning a clown disguise, or Moonraker, where we see him firing laser blasters inside of Drax’s space station. Then, compare those moments to the crescendo of From Russia with Love, where Connery’s Bond faces off against Red Grant in the tense train car showdown. Compare them to Brosnan’s Bond dangling from the top of the Janus Satellite as he battles his previous brother in arms in Goldeneye. Go as far as taking the ending of No Time to Die! What you’ll find is a thin strand of commonalities existing between each of them. Try to identify the norm, the regular. Having trouble doing so? Well, you should be, because the truth is, you can’t.

Not objectively at least. The Bond films have grown so large that it is hard to restrict them to one form and even if you find yourself able to do so, someone will surely make an argument that threatens to unravel your own conclusion. It leads me to my last point, the last descriptor listed in the definition of monolithic.
“Unwilling or unable to be changed”

It is here that I realize I was wrong. The franchise is not a monolith, it’s a chameleon. 

It frequently changes on the outside, and not just in minor ways. Many franchises exist on a single color spectrum, shifting with each entry to different shades and intensities. Bond’s nature escapes this restriction, instead proving its ability to shift to a variety of colors across the spectrum when needed.

Connery’s return after Lazenby’s sudden exit. 

The grounding of For Your Eyes Only to reel the films back in after Moonraker’s foray into the sci-fi genre.

If you would’ve shown me Die Another Day and then Casino Royale and told me that they came one after the other, I’d probably stop taking you seriously.

There have been dozens of shifts made to the films in the franchise, some brought about in an attempt to fix what the producers saw as previous mistakes, and others brought about by the changing times and the shifting culture. My examples above only highlight a small handful of these instances.

Bond exists as a chameleon because no matter what color, what shade, or what hue the franchise carries on its outer shell, the DNA remains the same. Every Bond film has something that a fan will look at and feel a connection to, a feeling of familiarity, a nostalgia for something that is equal parts old and new. What is that thing? Well, it’s up to each of us as individuals to answer that question. 

So, I ask once more…

What does Bond mean to you?

u/balehay34 — 7 days ago

I know most of the films changed the novel's plots but The Spy Who Loved Me only used the title, none of the plot in the book was used by the film

Heck, there were a couple times when I had to double check the title that I was in fact reading a James Bond novel, that's how different this one was.

Apparently this was one of Ian Fleming's least favorite of the books he wrote, hence why he only allowed the producers to borrow the name, none of the plot.

u/JimHFD103 — 7 days ago

In A View to a Kill, an orange and green / blue color scheme runs throughout the film, evoking the San Francisco Bay and Golden Gate Bridge.

Cool subliminal foreshadowing of the film's climax, in a Bond movie that isn't often praised for its visuals.

u/Sneaky_Bond — 8 days ago
▲ 114 r/JamesBond+1 crossposts

happy belated james bond day ! here's a poster for skyfall i made in august :)

happy belated james bond day ! here's a poster for skyfall i made in august :) you can view more of my work on instagram at jord.psd

u/jord_psd — 9 days ago

OPERATION BONDSLAM!

OPERATION BONDSLAM!

This is awks! A few new house guests have hit the Mint Juleps hard and found a golden love that dare not shpeak its name. I've hidden the golf balls for now, but someone is going to have to report this to HR.

u/CatchingBullets007 — 8 days ago
▲ 42 r/JamesBond+1 crossposts

Ian Fleming, creator of James Bond, on the cover of LIFE sixty years ago + twelve brief excerpts from the story about his early life (October 7, 1966)

A biography of Fleming was being published that fall, so Life started running an abridgement. Even the abridgement is too long to post here, so here are the twelve most interesting excerpts:

  1. After Fleming’s father was killed in World War I, his will left Fleming’s mother unusually sweeping financial control over her children—enough  to disinherit any of them.

Valentine Fleming, a fond father, was particularly attached to his second son and usually found time to write him a postcard from France. The last one arrived at the end of the Easter holidays in 1917. On May 20, Major Fleming was killed in action. He received a posthumous D.S.O. and left a gross estate of £265,596, then worth about $1.3 million. He also gave his widow sweeping powers to alter the terms of the will with respect to the children—in effect, she could disinherit any of them if she liked.

  1. At Eton, Fleming was overshadowed by his older brother Peter, so he stopped trying to compete and deliberately made eccentricity and individuality his way of standing out.

At Eton, Ian was inevitably outclassed and outdistanced by Peter. Ian solved the impasse in the only way he could: he no longer competed. And since he could not win success as a respectable and hard-working member of his house, he found other ways of achieving distinction. One was to concentrate on being an individual—a bit of a dandy, a bit of an eccentric. Rupert Hart-Davis, the publisher, remembers him as “something of a swell, walking down late for a breakfast of buttered eggs.” He was admired for his wit and for his caustic turn of phrase, but he liked to spend at least part of the day alone. He was popular, but most people were a little wary of him. It probably suited him that way.

  1. Fleming started writing during the “golden time” at Kitzbühel in Austria

Undoubtedly Ian would have come to terms with a lot of the difficulties in his own time; but as it was, the most important thing Ernan Forbes Dennis and Phyllis Bottome did for him was to supply aim and direction. For the first time in his life he really began to read—social history, anthropology and the history of science and technology. Encouraged by Phyllis Bottome, he wrote an imaginative short story—Death, on Two Occasions. Years later, when he was ill and famous, he wrote a letter in which he referred to those early days at Kitzbühel as “that golden time when the sun always shone.” He loved the Tyrol, the skiing, the climbing, the freedom. And the girls.

  1. Kitzbühel was a turning point in Fleming’s attitude toward women (which is a big part of the Bond books)

The English girls Fleming had known up to then seem to have been either prudish or mercenary, boring or a source of trouble, and his frequently expressed objections to Englishwomen—that they never wash and have no idea of how to make love properly—already seem to have been born. It was all so different in Kitzbühel: no mothers to worry about, no moral codes to outrage. He looked at the girls and they fell into his lap. One of the women who knew him then says, “He was quite ruthless about girls, or perhaps a more apt word is absent-minded. Women were all a bit of a joke for Ian, a treat to enjoy but not to make any sort of fuss about afterwards.”

  1. As a young Reuters reporter in 1933, Fleming was sent to Moscow to cover the Soviet trial of six British engineers accused of espionage and “wrecking”

He stayed on with his mother in London, and through her finally got a job. Sir Roderick Jones, head of the Reuters news agency, agreed to see him, liked the look of him and offered him a trial as a reporter. Fleming was lucky; after a year of routine work he was sent to Moscow to cover the trial of six British engineers who had been arrested by the Soviet secret police in March 1933 on charges of espionage and wrecking. An inexperienced reporter, Fleming was up against formidably expert competition. But in the final days before the trial opened, with the rumors exhausted and hard facts still untapped, he demonstrated the advantage of an ingenious imagination. He began a fill-in story with the knowledgeable line, “When the big hands of Moscow’s 300 electric clocks reach the hour of six. . . .”

“How do you know there are 300?” asked another reporter.

“How do you know there aren’t?” said Fleming.

  1. Before World War II, Fleming was already recording ideas about boredom, sex and the need for ever-stronger stimulation that became part of the James Bond formula

In the years just before World War II, he began to talk of “that awful boredom,” and he echoed this in Casino Royale: “The lengthy approaches to a seduction bored [James Bond] almost as much as the subsequent mess of disentanglement.” Fleming wrote in one of his notebooks, “What happens is that, as with drugs, [a man] needs a stronger shot each time, and women are just women. The consumption of one woman is the consumption of all. You can’t double the dose.”

  1. Fleming entered British Naval Intelligence in 1939 almost by chance

In May 1939 Fleming was invited to luncheon in London’s Carlton Grill by Rear Admiral John Godfrey, a man he had never met. Godfrey had been appointed Director of Naval Intelligence at the Admiralty, and he needed a personal assistant. A previous director, whose assistant had once been a stockbroker, told Godfrey he ought to look for a stockbroker too. Somehow Fleming was recommended.

At luncheon, Godfrey was impressed, for at 31 Ian Fleming was a striking young man. In addition to charm, vitality and a sense of adventure, he had acquired a certain confidence and an air of authority. But Godfrey wanted a chance to see him at work, and during July 1939, Fleming began visiting the Admiralty three or four afternoons a week. “Within a month,” says Godfrey, “he had a better all-round picture of the N.I.D. [Naval Intelligence Division] and its place in the Admiralty than most of the people who had been there for years.”

In July 1939 Ian was made a lieutenant in the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve, and by the time war was declared on Sept. 3 he had created a place for himself, even though he had a total lack of awe for admirals, generals and air marshals.

  1. Fleming became notorious for schemes that sounded half like future Bond plots

In the winter of 1939-40 London was full of secret organizations. The geniuses and crackpots were getting their chance at last: even First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill had pet plans which left fiction far behind. The fantasist in Fleming fed on the contacts between Naval Intelligence and the cloak-and-dagger world of Special Operations Executive, an organization set up to carry out irregular operations such as parachuting men and weapons to resistance movements.

“A lot of Ian’s ideas,” says Admiral Denning, “were just plain crazy. . . . But a lot of them had just that glimmer of possibility in them. . . . Just before the Dieppe raid [in August 1942] he had the idea of sinking a great block of concrete with men inside it in the English Channel to keep watch on the harbor through periscopes. We never did it, of course, but it might have worked.”

He also evolved a scheme to taunt the enemy fleet into giving battle by beaming a torrent of insults to the German navy’s wavelength from a British cruiser. It had to be dropped because no cruiser with a sufficiently powerful transmitter was available.

In 1941 Fleming became aware of a certain Nazi, Otto Skorzeny, who two years later was to carry out the daring aerial rescue of Mussolini and later was to become the inspiration for Sir Hugo Drax in Moonraker. Studying the loss of the island of Crete to airborne German troops, Fleming sensed that Skorzeny and his group had been given a special role. Although they landed in the first wave, they had taken no part in the main fighting. It seemed to Fleming that their job was to grab British secret material: maps, divisional orders, codes and equipment. They were the first Intelligence Commandos, and Fleming was convinced this was an idea which N.I.D. could copy.

The result was what became known as No. 30 Assault Unit—or, as Fleming liked to say, “my Red Indians.”

  1. Fleming trained in sabotage, safe-blowing, lock-picking—but could not bring himself to pull the trigger during an assassination test

The school at Oshawa [Canada] provided Fleming with a lot of tricks which he was to pass on to James Bond. Yet, despite Fleming’s success, none of his instructors seemed to think that he would have made a satisfactory agent in the field.

“Look what happened at the end of the course,” Stephenson says. “We used to book this instructor a room in a cheap downtown hotel in Toronto. Then we’d give the trainee the name of this hotel and the room number and say that the man staying there was a dangerous enemy agent who had to be destroyed. We’d try to pressure him into thinking that it was a genuine killing. Now, one of the tricks this instructor had picked up was the ability to dodge a bullet—a sort of circus trick. If you fired at him from five yards he knew how to divert you sufficiently for the shot to go wide. Well, after the success Ian had been having on the course we were all interested to know what would happen, and I briefed him myself. I made sure his gun was loaded. I told him that the games were over now and this was serious. ‘Open that door, draw fast and shoot straight,’ I told him. Several of us were at the hotel watching when Ian arrived. He got as far as the landing, and then there he waited a long time. Then he went away. He apologized about it. ‘You know,’ he said, ‘I just couldn’t open that door. I couldn’t kill a man that way.’”

In real life Fleming liked to imagine that he had killed someone in the line of duty. To one friend he confided that the killing had been done with a sandbag. To another he hinted that he had performed the terrible deed by firing a small automatic. . . . Still another friend is convinced Ian slugged an agent of the wartime Vichy government in France and tipped him into the Marseilles harbor.

  1. He indirectly helped come up with the OSS (predecessor of the CIA)

In June 1941 Fleming came nearest to living the life of high adventure he had always dreamed of. With Admiral Godfrey he made a top-secret trip to the U.S. to attempt to establish closer relations with American intelligence—a delicate matter, since the U.S. was not yet at war.

In Washington J. Edgar Hoover was uninterested in the Godfrey-Fleming mission; he already had his channels with the Canadian millionaire Sir William Stephenson, who represented British intelligence in the U.S. But in New York Stephenson received the admiral and the commander; Fleming immediately became a hero-worshiper of “Little Bill,” who opened up a whole new world to him. Stephenson was a master of the technology of subversion.

Back in Washington, Fleming disappeared for a couple of days, and when he finally returned to London he took with him a present from General “Wild Bill” Donovan, whom President Roosevelt had decided to appoint “Coordinator of Information.” It was a .38 Police Positive Colt revolver with the inscription, “For Special Services.” After the war Fleming would occasionally tell his friends that it was given to him by the father of the American Secret Service, without divulging what the “special services” were. But in a letter written a few years before he died, Fleming did say that he had spent some time in Donovan’s Washington home “writing the original charter” of the Office of Strategic Services.

  1. The baccarat showdown in Casino Royale was inspired by a stopover in Lisbon.

During the stopover in Lisbon, Fleming played out the scene which was to grow in his imagination for 11 years until it formed the plot of his first book, Casino Royale.

Fleming himself has described how he got the idea of James Bond’s baccarat battle with Le Chiffre from a game he himself played in deadly earnest against a group of Nazis. However the reality seems to have been different. At the Lisbon gaming tables, Fleming did whisper to Admiral Godfrey, “Just suppose that those fellows over there are German agents!” But only a handful of Portuguese were present, the croupiers were bored, and Fleming played a long, unsuccessful game until he was cleaned out.

  1. He microfilmed Japanese codeooks – another thing that got into Casino Royale in altered form

Stephenson even showed Fleming a little action and, while in Casino Royale, Fleming described the two missions which had earned his hero his double-O classification—a license to kill—one of them was the shooting of a Japanese cipher expert in New York. The death of the Japanese was a highly exaggerated account of an adventure in which Fleming took part with Stephenson. There was not a killing, but there was a Japanese cipher expert, in a Rockefeller Center office one floor below Stephenson’s. At 3 a.m. Fleming, Stephenson and two assistants “borrowed” the Japanese code books from the office safe and in no time at all got the code books microfilmed upstairs and returned to their exact place. To Stephenson it was a straightforward operation, to Fleming a great and gleeful adventure.

u/Crazy-Old-Stories — 8 days ago