[CA] What stops businesses and brokers from using outside financial support?
I provide fractional CFO and transaction-related financial support to small and mid-sized businesses, and I’ve noticed the same issues come up repeatedly in conversations with both business owners and brokers.
For business owners, it is often limited visibility into cash flow, weak reporting, uncertainty around profitability, or simply not having anyone internally who can turn the numbers into useful decisions.
For brokers, it is often messy financials, unsupported add-backs, sellers who do not fully understand their numbers, and deals losing momentum because the financial information is not ready.
What I find interesting is that even when these problems are acknowledged, there is often no follow-through and things continue as they are.
What normally stops a business from bringing in outside financial support?
Is it cost, uncertainty around the value, concern about giving an outsider access to sensitive information, or simply being too busy dealing with day-to-day operations?
For brokers, is the concern introducing another person into the client relationship, slowing down the process, or not knowing how the service should be structured?
Part of the reason I’m asking is that I think there is room for a flexible model where businesses get senior financial support without hiring a full-time CFO, and brokers can have someone handle the financial work in the background while they maintain control of the relationship.
My background is in buy-side due diligence and fractional CFO work, so I’m curious whether this is something businesses and brokers genuinely want, or whether I’m overlooking a bigger obstacle.