u/Illustrious_Big675

I’ve spent the last few years developing a structured model for cosmic origins that emerges from a very simple idea: systems across biology, physics, and cognition follow the same reaction–structure architecture.I’m not a professional physicist, but I’ve built a manuscript that uses a canonical scalar field, potential‑well dynamics, and hierarchical feedback loops to show how the same mathematical structure appears in: – early‑universe field behavior
– biological homeostasis
– cognitive stabilization
– and recursive self‑modeling.

I’m looking for someone with a strong mathematical or cosmology background who can give an objective read — not to endorse it, but to tell me whether the structure is internally consistent and where it breaks.

If you’re open to looking at a serious, non‑fantastical attempt at a unified architecture, I’d appreciate your eyes on it.

I’m working with a scalar‑field potential that starts flat and transitions into a quadratic minimum. The form is:

V(\phi)=V_0\left[1-\exp\left(-\frac{\phi}{\phi_t}\right)\right]^2+\frac12 m^2(\phi-\phi_{\min})^2.

I’m trying to make sure I’m handling the perturbation side correctly — mainly the Mukhanov–Sasaki equation and how the sound‑speed term behaves through the transition.

If someone with cosmology coursework or experience is willing to look at a couple pages, that would be helpful.

I’m working on a scalar‑field cosmology idea and I’m trying to sanity‑check a couple technical steps.

The potential I’m using is a plateau → quadratic form:
[ V(\phi)=V_0\left[1-\exp\left(-\frac{\phi}{\phi_t}\right)\right]^2+\frac12 m^2(\phi-\phi_{\min})^2. ]

I get stuck on the perturbation side (Mukhanov–Sasaki + the scale‑dependent sound speed), so I figured I’d ask

If anyone familiar with cosmology, perturbation theory, or CLASS/CAMB

Hi everyone,
I’m an independent researcher with no institutional affiliation, preparing to submit a physics manuscript to arXiv. My account was routed into the manual setup path, so I’m looking for someone who has previously submitted in any physics category and can help me complete the setup step.

For context, the manuscript has already been submitted to APS (Physical Review D), so the work is fully written, finalized, and in the formal review pipeline. I just need to complete the arXiv setup step.

Here is the title and abstract so you can verify the work:

Title:
A Canonical Scalar Field with a Smooth Plateau–Quadratic Potential

Abstract:
We analyze a canonical scalar field evolving in a smooth plateau–quadratic potential and derive its background, perturbative, and coarse‑grained dynamics across the slow‑roll, transition, and oscillatory regimes. The potential admits a well‑defined minimum with an analytically controlled effective mass, enabling a clean separation between early slow roll and late‑time coherent oscillations. Using the Mukhanov–Sasaki formalism, we obtain the full linear perturbation equation and identify the WKB regime in which the field behaves as an effective pressureless component with a scale‑dependent sound speed. The resulting expressions for the effective sound speed, WKB transition scale, and scale‑dependent gravitational coupling determine the suppression of small‑scale power. These analytical results provide the foundation for Boltzmann‑code implementation and observational comparison.

If you’re willing to help, it only takes a few seconds on your end. I’d really appreciate it.