This has always been my preferred duo, and Hutch is finally with me on Ossoff, but with the Dems needing to win the governorship I highly suggest donating to Bottoms so that John can run for president and lead this country for 8 years.
We need young talent and Ossoff is our man to fix the f-up of this administration.
Its just another example of far lefties, or far lefty apologists, co-opting a Democrat term and bastardizing it.
Give them some name suggestions below
Hutch tells Jolah (paraphrasing) 'I've learned that when you spar w dgg and you see bad comments on reddit, you bring them up on stream, then those bad comments get worse, it's just a bad cycle that self-reinforces. But you are likely only dealing with comments from 1% of dgg.'
Jolah: "They make you look crazy to other regular people."
So Jolah understands what DSA does to Democrats, but he doesn't think it's a big deal, but when Jolah faces this exact situation, in his words, he immediately loses it.
So Jolah, DSA makes us look crazy, immediately disavow them as loudly as you did us. You told everyone how bad we are, how we shouldn't be listened to, how no one should engage with us.
You say the DSA is a problem and that you are not an op, time to prove it. Please keep that same energy up with them now. :)
I'm answering all their stuff, then when he knew who I'd vote for he asked 3 more questions.
Does it make you less or more likely to vote for your candidate if:
You knew he wanted illegal immigrants to come and immediately get social security cards and government benefits?
You knew he was in favor of letting trans-women into girls bathrooms?
You knew he wanted to raise taxes and make the life of working class citizens harder.
My candidate DOES NOT support these things!
Of course I said I strongly agree each would increase my likelihood of voting for them, because I saw how fucked up these questions were, but if pollsters are calling people to see who their voting for and smearing their candidate with the last questions how is this not affecting the electorate by a point or two? Or more?
It's like a personal political conversation designed to denigrate your candidate via a survey.
This is so fucked up.
Cutle is a really fun game where they give you an odd shape and you try to cut it in half. I just cant get over how my distribution is so fake looking. Just thought I'd share somewhere
Their website is pfiffel.com/cutle its a really fun and quick daily game
So let me get this straight. El-sayed is a doctor, who has never practiced, his wife is a psychiatrist that doesn't accept medicare, but he is running on a platform of Medicare for all and he made 700k last year and he owns rental properties in India, the UAE and the US?
Hmm
You don't need to say the dsa will cause us to lose a few house seats. While true, the scope isn't scary enough to worry these short term thinking leftist apologists like Soypill and Pisco. However, if Ossoff wins the Democratic nomination for president the leftists will slaughter him, never vote for him and they will succeed in lowering the amount of people voting for him and ruin the good name of the Democrat party in the process. We could lose the presidential election in 2 years. Make them reckon with that, a concrete example.
:)
+
Hamasabi
Dog Abuser
Diddy piker
slopanabi
hasnofriends-or-hobbies
brothel-andy
hasshole
mao-ze-dork
piker-underage
shockanabi
Giving workers another day off is great optics and Democrat candidates should be campaigning with this message. The more people who vote the better Democrats will do, so Republicans will be against it. Spin it, Republicans are against getting another day off, easy win.
It's all coming together!
The common objection to Destiny interviewing experts he agrees with is that there's "nothing to talk about." He likes to argue, that's the whole thing. But this framing misses what these conversations actually accomplish for an audience, and what they could do for him.
When two knowledgeable people who agree on something talk through it properly, they surface the underlying reasoning, the evidence, the nuance, all the stuff that usually gets skipped when you already "know" you're right. Destiny might understand the conclusion, but an expert can explain the path to it in ways his audience has never heard. The disagreement doesn't have to come from him, it can come from the audience sitting at home with the wrong priors.
An expert in the same lane will have different framings, different analogies, different ways of stress-testing the position. Even if they land in the same place, the route can be entirely new. That's genuinely useful, not for changing his mind, but for sharpening how he defends it. New steel-man versions of opposing arguments. Better rhetorical tools. A vocabulary he didn't have before. The conversation might not move him ideologically, but it can make him harder to move when someone actually does push back.
When Destiny says something, his audience is already calibrated to how confident he usually sounds. When an expert with credentials and domain-specific experience independently arrives at the same conclusion on stream, that signals something. It's not just that the position sounds more credible, it actually is, because it's survived contact with someone whose livelihood depends on getting that subject right. Consensus between two independent informed people is a meaningful data point, even if both people were already sure.
Part of Destiny's brand is intellectual honesty. Bringing on someone who actually specializes in a topic and genuinely deferring to them where appropriate demonstrates the thing he asks of everyone else. It doesn't require manufactured conflict to be interesting. Watching a smart generalist engage seriously with a domain expert is compelling on its own.
The argument against these conversations assumes the only value is friction. But an audience doesn't just watch to see Destiny win arguments, they watch to learn, to feel more confident in what they already believe, and occasionally to update. Interviews with experts he agrees with serve all three. The format doesn't have to be a debate to be worth watching.
