u/Impossible-Tailor679

Image 1 — Urban areas providing almost no los cover is still really annoying.
Image 2 — Urban areas providing almost no los cover is still really annoying.
Image 3 — Urban areas providing almost no los cover is still really annoying.
Image 4 — Urban areas providing almost no los cover is still really annoying.
Image 5 — Urban areas providing almost no los cover is still really annoying.
Image 6 — Urban areas providing almost no los cover is still really annoying.
Image 7 — Urban areas providing almost no los cover is still really annoying.
Image 8 — Urban areas providing almost no los cover is still really annoying.
Image 9 — Urban areas providing almost no los cover is still really annoying.
Image 10 — Urban areas providing almost no los cover is still really annoying.
Image 11 — Urban areas providing almost no los cover is still really annoying.
▲ 90 r/warno

Urban areas providing almost no los cover is still really annoying.

Sometime ago I made a post complaining about how bad "infantry areas" were and why it's the reason infantry are so tanky against vehicles. I had moved on from that post until I bought the 101th/157th divisions, and played a few team games. I then decided to see how bad it could actually get if you leveled an entire town, these images are the results.

why do these areas provide no los cover? Destroyed buildings in steel division 2 did, and I'm pretty sure buildings in wgrd did (I could be remembering wrong), why was this removed for warno? All this does is make infantry (a core unit next to tanks) even worse to play.

For those who may comment about how out of 3 images only one can actually hit its target if these were enemies. Hunt move would do this without the player having to find spots (which are very few)

Id also recommend people to go and see for yourself how easy it is to fire through entire towns.