u/IncidentCold9713

I went to the 2026 Taiwan 3D Printing & Additive Manufacturing Show today, mainly to check out Shining 3D’s latest consumer-grade 3D scanner, the EinScan Trak.
It’s a blue-laser scanner with 19+19 crossed laser lines + 7 laser lines + 1 deep-hole laser line, so it basically has all the features you would normally need for inspection work. However, I haven’t been able to find any data on its volumetric accuracy yet.
I’ve used this type of Tracker-based scanning system before, so the thing I was most curious about was how well the tracking actually performs.
The first thing I noticed is how small the Tracker is. It’s really convenient to carry around and use. But that also made me wonder: does making the Tracker smaller mean the tracking range is smaller too? That was the main thing I wanted to test today.
At the show, I started by scanning the motorcycle in front of me using a 0.5–1.0 mm point distance. At 0.5 mm, the scanning was noticeably slower. The laptop they provided probably didn’t have a lot of RAM, and I got a warning after scanning for a while. After switching to 0.8 mm, I was able to scan the front section of the motorcycle without any problem.
As for the tracking, I noticed a pretty interesting feature. During scanning, the software displays a white 3D tracking box.
You can see the scanner’s current position inside the tracking space, as well as the distance between the scanner and the object and roughly how large the tracking range is. I actually found this really useful because it gives you a very clear idea of where you are while scanning and which direction you should move the scanner. It makes the whole process much easier to control.
I also checked the price just now, and it looks like it’s only $6,999 USD. That’s definitely a very competitive price for this type of system.
For now, I only had a chance to play around with it and do a quick test at the show, so there’s only so much I could test under those conditions. For more detailed testing of the accuracy, tracking distance, and overall stability, I’ll leave that to the more experienced users and look forward to seeing their reviews in the future.

I took the crab I scanned last time and brought it to life with 3D printing! 🦀
From scanning it to actually printing it out, the whole process was pretty satisfying 🤣

The latest CrealityScan 4.2.2 update introduced AI-powered 3DGS (3D Gaussian Splatting) processing.
Honestly, I originally thought 3DGS would be an exclusive feature and technology for the Pika series. Thankfully, Creality didn’t limit it to specific models, so Raptor Pro users can also experience this feature.
For this test, I decided to scan a jackfruit. After scanning it and processing the data with 3DGS, I was really impressed by how realistic the result turned out! The dense, bumpy texture on the surface of the jackfruit was captured incredibly well. Looking at it for too long honestly made me feel like my trypophobia was about to kick in. 😂
I’ve also included a link to the model below. If you’re interested, feel free to check out my scan and experience the unique look and charm of 3DGS for yourself!

Click here to view the 3DGS model

Ever had this happen?

You leave the oil tank cap on the table thinking, “I’ll need it again in a minute.”

Then you turn around and… wait, where did it go? 😂

You search everywhere, find absolutely nothing, and maybe a few days later it randomly shows up in the weirdest corner. Or maybe it just disappeared into another dimension. 🤣

So instead of wasting more time looking for it… why not just make a new one?

For this one, I used the CR-Scan Raptor Pro to scan the threads on the tank and capture the actual dimensions. Then I brought the measurements into Fusion 360 and designed a replacement cap from scratch.

I printed it in PETG-CF, which works really well for small functional parts like this that get handled regularly.

I also added a carbon-fiber texture to the surface of the cap. It gives you a little extra grip so it’s less likely to slip out of your hand, and it also makes the finished part look a lot cleaner than a typical 3D-printed part.

So sometimes, when you lose something, you don’t necessarily have to keep looking for it. 🤣

Just model it, print it, and make yourself a new one.

#3DScan #CRScanRaptorPro #Fusion360 #3DPrinting #PETGCF #DIY #ReverseEngineering

S2S Challenge

Ever had this happen?

You leave the oil tank cap on the table thinking, “I’ll need it again in a minute.”

Then you turn around and… wait, where did it go? 😂

You search everywhere, find absolutely nothing, and maybe a few days later it randomly shows up in the weirdest corner. Or maybe it just disappeared into another dimension. 🤣

So instead of wasting more time looking for it… why not just make a new one?

For this one, I used the CR-Scan Raptor Pro to scan the threads on the tank and capture the actual dimensions. Then I brought the measurements into Fusion 360 and designed a replacement cap from scratch.

I printed it in PETG-CF, which works really well for small functional parts like this that get handled regularly.

I also added a carbon-fiber texture to the surface of the cap. It gives you a little extra grip so it’s less likely to slip out of your hand, and it also makes the finished part look a lot cleaner than a typical 3D-printed part.

So sometimes, when you lose something, you don’t necessarily have to keep looking for it. 🤣

Just model it, print it, and make yourself a new one.

This time, I decided to scan a preserved crab specimen just to see how much detail it could capture. I was pleasantly surprised by the final result—it turned out even better than I expected! 🤣

From the texture of the shell to the fine details of the claws and legs, the scanner captured everything remarkably well. The overall result looks incredibly realistic.

This time, I decided to scan a preserved crab specimen just to see how much detail it could capture. I was pleasantly surprised by the final result—it turned out even better than I expected! 🤣

From the texture of the shell to the fine details of the claws and legs, the scanner captured everything remarkably well. The overall result looks incredibly realistic.

This Japanese-made CVK30 carburetor originally used a front/rear pull throttle design. At first, I thought either the front pull or rear pull setup would work, but after installing it, I found that the front pull cable would interfere with the cylinder, while the rear pull required a huge routing loop. Neither option looked right.

Since 3D scanning is so convenient nowadays, I decided to scan the original part and redesign an up-pull throttle bracket. Not only does it give a cleaner cable route, but it also fits the installation space perfectly. Problem solved. 😎

This time I used the Raptor Pro to scan a Honda CBR400RR fuel tank. The entire scanning process went more smoothly than I expected, and I didn’t run into any major difficulties. The most time-consuming part was simply applying the markers.

To capture the entire tank, I scanned it in two separate passes—one for the top side and one for the bottom—creating two scan projects before merging them together. At first, I was a little concerned that an object with so many repeated features across its surface might end up with alignment issues or visible seams after merging.

However, once the final mesh was processed, I could barely see any signs of the merge at all. The result looks very clean and natural, so it turns out my concerns were completely unnecessary. 😅

This time I used the Raptor Pro to scan a Honda CBR400RR fuel tank. The entire scanning process went more smoothly than I expected, and I didn’t run into any major difficulties. The most time-consuming part was simply applying the markers.

To capture the entire tank, I scanned it in two separate passes—one for the top side and one for the bottom—creating two scan projects before merging them together. At first, I was a little concerned that an object with so many repeated features across its surface might end up with alignment issues or visible seams after merging.

However, once the final mesh was processed, I could barely see any signs of the merge at all. The result looks very clean and natural, so it turns out my concerns were completely unnecessary. 😅

This time, I’m scanning a traditional deity statue that embodies rich local cultural heritage. Most of these pieces are meticulously hand-carved by master craftsmen, reflecting decades of skill, dedication, and experience. It’s this craftsmanship that gives each piece its own unique soul and character.

Through 3D scanning, these works—which embody history, faith, and the spirit of traditional craftsmanship—can be faithfully preserved in digital form, allowing more people to appreciate the beauty of this timeless art.

Captured with the Creality Raptor Pro.

Looks like my scanner has a second job now: recreating old parts for the family. 🤣

Just sharing my experience scanning an engine bay with the Raptor Pro. The 22-line laser mode definitely takes some patience, and it still has trouble reaching those really deep, pitch-black spots 😅. That said, it managed to capture most of the engine bay and all the major mechanical components, so I’m pretty happy with how it turned out.

Just wanted to share my experience scanning a motorcycle spoke wheel with the Creality Raptor Pro. To capture the best possible detail, I took my time scanning it at 0.3mm. I honestly thought alignment was going to be a nightmare with all those spokes, but it actually paired up perfectly just by selecting a few identical feature points in the middle. The final result turned out pretty damn good!

Tried scanning a BMW X5 interior with the Creality Raptor Pro today. I thought it’d be super slow, but the process was actually pretty smooth. Missing that deep hole feature definitely makes a difference, but overall, the final result still looks pretty good.

Just finished scanning a 1/100 MS-06S Zaku with the Creality CR-Scan Raptor Pro.

I used the highest resolution setting to capture as much detail as possible, including the panel lines, armor layers, and all the tiny features on the kit.

Honestly, I expected to lose some of the finer details, but the results were surprisingly impressive. The scanner picked up a lot more detail than I thought it would, and the overall quality definitely exceeded my expectations. Pretty happy with the outcome!

I used an Xhorse scanner to capture the scan data, then imported it into QUICKSURFACE for the reverse engineering workflow.

During the modeling process, I tried to preserve the original surface transitions and surface flow as much as possible, so the overall surface quality would look cleaner and the transitions between surfaces would feel more natural and seamless.

After finishing the model, I also carried out analysis and deviation inspection to verify that the differences between the CAD model and the original part stayed within a reasonable tolerance range.

For me, reverse engineering is not just about recreating the shape — it’s also about preserving the original surface flow and fine details as accurately as possible.

This time I used the Xhorse 7+7+1 scanner to take on scanning a Ford car interior.

Automotive interiors are actually a pretty difficult subject to scan, since you can’t use any scanning spray, and there are also lots of black and highly reflective plastic parts. For consumer-grade scanners, that’s a pretty big challenge.

I scanned at a 0.5 mm resolution, and during the process I kept adjusting the laser brightness and exposure settings. When needed, I also switched to single-line deep hole mode to slowly fill in the missing areas of the scan.

Considering this scanner’s current hardware setup, I think the final result turned out really solid.

This time I used the Xhorse 7×7 laser scanner to scan the front bumper of a Volkswagen T5. To capture more complete details, I set the scan resolution to 0.55 mm. The scanning process was a bit slower because of the higher resolution, but I still managed to fully capture the entire front bumper in the end. I’m pretty satisfied with how the details turned out.

Today, I used the Xhorse scanner to take on the challenge of scanning a motorcycle frame. To capture better detail, I applied scanning spray to the frame to reduce reflections and improve tracking stability. A motorcycle frame is honestly much more difficult to scan than it looks — the geometry is complex, with many blocked areas. This time, I split the frame into three separate scans and merged them afterward, mainly because I didn’t have enough marker spheres. I think this was probably close to the limit of what this scanner could handle 😅 But in the end, the result actually turned out really well, and most of the details and overall shape were captured successfully!