I'm sick of how pet owners dislike me, while proceeding to make a very good case for why not to own pets. Like, all I ever see are pet owners being inconvenienced by their pets & also pets always being at their worst. Then, they wonder why I don't like them & it's like, "Seriously?"
My egg donor has 3 big & aggressive dogs (1 of them being a hunting dog), she also barely feeds them. Today, her Cane Corso attempted to get some food that fell at my feet & when I harshly reprimanded him she tried to dismiss it, "He isn't gonna bite you," like how TF can you be that confident? It's disturbing how she's not the only pet owner to act like that.
I fucking hate people who insist on having pets for security, first off I've seen plenty of security dogs fail at their job & #2 many times the security dogs attack you. The other issue is that you become numb to their barking, since they bark at pretty much everything, you become numb to it & then when there's a real threat you're already in danger before you even realize what's going on (if you're not dead). Not to mention, you're still stuck with an animal you gotta take care of. It'd be more efficient to get a gun or just a, "beware of dog," sign.
I just got rejected by another person that I was interested in a potential relationship with, b/c I'm pet free. What's funny is she claimed, "99% of your profile is you shitting on pet owners," which that actually isn't true, matter of fact I only joined this sub last year, but there's also plenty of other posts I made, too. But, also the fact she exhibited a persecution complex by claiming that I, "shit on pet owners," when IRL mosts of my posts here are me complaining about how my birthgivers are irresponsible & selfish pet owners isn't, "shitting on them," it's rightful criticism. Honestly, I feel like I dodged a bullet & feel vindicated, like the fact she didn't disclose she owned pets, imagine I was allergic.
So, for context: I'm originally from Florida, but due to disability had to move in with my egg donor in Ohio, she neglected to tell me she had 3 dogs (despite having been in Ohio for 2yrs by that point & having had the dogs for about 2yrs, too).
My egg donor's 3 dogs are untrained & rambunctious beyond belief, lately, she's wanted *me* to train them to behave (she only began caring, once she got affected, BTW), however b/c they're dumb animals & also due to her spoiling them beyond belief, it basically is impossible (sometimes it briefly works, before they revert back to their base instincts).
And, it recently dawned on me: why TF is it my job to train *your* dogs? IMO, they should've been trained long ago (for further context, she keeps them inside all day to avoid having to train them & also so they can claim they never harmed anyone, which is kinda easy when you have no friends & don't take them outside).
So, I thought about how Christianity is reliant on biblical interpretation & how much of Christianity is built around various people's interpretation (including the books written by various preachers about their interpretations) & it dawned on me: isn't the Bible the alleged word of the Abrahamic god? Why can't we take it at face value, if it's never wrong & has all the answers? That fact alone, combined with how humans get shit wrong all the time, IMO, is the glaring silver bullet in the heart of Christianity.
Someone tried to claim to me that early Christianity wasn't bad prior to the rise of the Roman empire, how do I debunk this?