u/Intelligent_One_1203

WG Suggestions for Ranked Matchmaking and better quality of life

The majority of longer-term players all agree that the matchmaking system is horrible. I can tell with 85% accuracy that I will lose, win, or have a decent fight based on ships being fielded and which commanders at what level being played. I know which ships are going to be problems and which will be easier to deal with the same accuracy.

Here are some suggestions to make Ranked Better for the players.

  • Minimum Commander Level 11/1 or 12/2
  • Match # of Premium ships on each side. +/- 1

Losing stars on losing Team make it so it is more forgiving when you have more players.

  • 4v4 or less, 1 keeps stars
  • 5v5 or 6v6. Top 2 keep stars
  • 7v7+ Top 3 keep stars.

Other suggestions for implementation variety

  • Stock Commanders only every couple of Seasons (1/3)
  • Stock Ships every couple of Seasons (1/4)
reddit.com

Secondary ships

I love secondary ships. I know the Germans and the Massa/Rhode island, Flandre, and the alantico.

My question is by nation what other ships are good for secondary builds?

USA?

IJN?

Italy?

RUS?

UK?

France?

I just want to keep an eye out for them if they show back up in the store etc.

reddit.com
u/Intelligent_One_1203 — 4 days ago

Ranked 100

7v7 Tier V specific boat list (limit 2 DD per Team)

  • Tech Tree: Mahan, Pensacola, New Mexico, Aoba, Fubuki, Fusō, Icarus, Queen Elizabeth, Nürnberg, Gaede, Bayern, La Galissonnière, and Normandie.
  • Premium: Arizona, Warspite, Warspite B, De Grasse, Graf Spee, Mutsu, Dunkerque, and T-61.

What are people thinking of playing? What's the meta of this List?

I have Mutsu and Arizona figure I'll try them out maybe fall back on Gaede see how things play out.

reddit.com
u/Intelligent_One_1203 — 11 days ago