Was Wemby's shot "bad"?
I got into a minor back and forth with my friend, who said:
"That (shot) was crazy, that was a really dumb shot by Wemby though". His argument was that there was a long shot clock, it was a high-risk shot that had only a low chance of going in (he estimated 25%), and that he was left open because OKC was OK with him shooting that shot.
I replied that it wasn't a "great" shot, but it certainly wasn't "really dumb". Wemby threw the ball ahead and then trailed the play; transition trailers are very effective scorers. That was intentional. He received the ball in rhythm, was wide open, and shot a very mechanically normal shot that he looked very confident in. His calculus was likely that it was a wide open look with 30+ game seconds left, and he might as well take the open look because they might not get a better one. His % on those shots, wide open in rhythm probably isn't "bad", and certainly not much worse than a contested shot from the actual arc, which is what he would have gotten had he proceeded forward.
So I'm curious as to your thoughts as coaches. Good shot? Bad shot?