Estoy empezando a tradear y estoy buscando comunidades digitales de trading en Colombia. Más que nada es para ver si compartir con otros traders y ver si hay eventos, conversaciones, webinars, temas educativos para aprender trading y compartir experiencias etc...
Se vale cualquier canal Whatsapp, Telegram, Discord, Facebook, Twitter, Reddit etc...
¡Gracias!
Got a few question, so bear with me... I've been thinking about this for a while and I'm curious if anyone here has actually tested this at scale.
In my experience, AI-generated content has actually worked pretty well. Not because I'm just generating something and posting whatever comes out, but because you can give it a specific direction, tone of voice, visual style, etc., and get some genuinely interesting content out of it.
Obviously, there's a ton of AI slop out there. But there's also plenty of human-made slop lol.
So I'm curious about what happens when the quality is actually comparable. Say you have two good posts: one created by a designer from scratch and another created mostly with AI but with strong human direction. Both look good, communicate something useful and fit the brand.
Does one actually perform better?
I'm talking specifically about reach, impressions, likes, shares, comments, etc. Does the algorithm care how the content was created, or does it mostly care about how people respond to it?
There's also the perception side of it. It seems like as soon as something gets labeled "AI-generated," some people automatically see it as less valuable or less creative, even if they liked it before knowing it was AI. Why is original human-made content inherently seen as more valuable if AI can produce great content as well?
And then there's something else I'm really curious about: what happens when AI-generated content isn't labeled as AI?
Let's say you post an AI-generated image on Instagram, Facebook or X without explicitly saying it was made with AI. Can these platforms detect that anyway? And if they can, does that affect distribution or performance? Is there any algorithmic difference between voluntarily labeling something as AI, the platform detecting it as AI, and posting something where neither happens?
Would love to hear from anyone who's actually experimented with this. Especially people managing accounts where you've been able to compare AI-assisted content vs fully human-created content over a decent period of time.
Got a few question, so bear with me... I've been thinking about this for a while and I'm curious if anyone here has actually tested this at scale.
In my experience, AI-generated content has actually worked pretty well. Not because I'm just generating something and posting whatever comes out, but because you can give it a specific direction, tone of voice, visual style, etc., and get some genuinely interesting content out of it.
Obviously, there's a ton of AI slop out there. But there's also plenty of human-made slop lol.
So I'm curious about what happens when the quality is actually comparable. Say you have two good posts: one created by a designer from scratch and another created mostly with AI but with strong human direction. Both look good, communicate something useful and fit the brand.
Does one actually perform better?
I'm talking specifically about reach, impressions, likes, shares, comments, etc. Does the algorithm care how the content was created, or does it mostly care about how people respond to it?
There's also the perception side of it. It seems like as soon as something gets labeled "AI-generated," some people automatically see it as less valuable or less creative, even if they liked it before knowing it was AI. Why is original human-made content inherently seen as more valuable if AI can produce great content as well?
And then there's something else I'm really curious about: what happens when AI-generated content isn't labeled as AI?
Let's say you post an AI-generated image on Instagram, Facebook or X without explicitly saying it was made with AI. Can these platforms detect that anyway? And if they can, does that affect distribution or performance? Is there any algorithmic difference between voluntarily labeling something as AI, the platform detecting it as AI, and posting something where neither happens?
Would love to hear from anyone who's actually experimented with this. Especially people managing accounts where you've been able to compare AI-assisted content vs fully human-created content over a decent period of time.