u/JadenStar10

Hello Brothers and Sisters,

I have seen many try to dispute the legitimacy of Paul and thus place the Gospel over his writings and make his letters akin to secondary sources or apocrypha on the basis he was not an original apostle or his claim of contact with Jesus is dubious. I was taken in by this line of thinking until I did my own research and saw Paul was accepted by the other Apostles and his teachings were approved. Whenever I see arguments against Paul be brought up, I have never seen this fact be addressed, but I am wondering the following: What would be the argument against Paul despite him being fully accepted as an Apostle by the other disciples of Jesus (bar Judas obviously).

Sincerely,
An Inquiring Faithful of Christ.