
silpoly waterproofness: specs vs. reality
I was recently surprised by the lack of waterproofness of some silpoly that I was working with. It's 1.1-oz. silpoly from Ripstop by the Roll. It's advertised as having a hydrostatic head of "~2000mm," but in my experience, it failed at far less than 2000mm.
Of course, there is variation in fabric. Some batches of a material that's advertised as having an HH of around 2000 mm will instead have a lower HH. But in my experience, the HH was dramatically lower.
I decided to run a second test, and you can see pictures and videos at https://imgur.com/a/x9RNDIz. The test is simple: take an unused, unfolded scrap of silpoly, fasten it to the top of a glass jar, pour water on it, and see whether any water leaks through to the bottom of the jar. This isn't a formal test of hydrostatic head, but it seems informative.
Within 30 seconds of pouring water on the silpoly, I got substantial leakage. The depth of water on top of the silpoly was never greater than 2 inches ≈ 51 mm. And 51 mm is about 2.5% of the advertised average hydrostatic head. This seems to me like a catastrophic failure.
But I am a novice. Am I just misunderstanding hydrostatic head or testing waterproofness in an illegitimate way? Alternatively, if my fabric really isn't up to spec, is it very anomalous, or have you had problems like this, too?
Copying others who've written on closely related matters: u/Big-Strain1830, u/orangecatpacks, u/Beer_Is_So_Awesome, u/KCBaker85, u/Accurate-Peace-954, u/FuguSandwich, u/dandurston.