S&S definitely doesn't have a bulgary's sharm, and it's thicker, and as typically for S&S has sharp edges and requires post-processing...but.... i like it, how it feels and how it fits. And what it more important, it accessible and affordable.
Merkur tourbillon and WD elementum have similar styles of dial decoration: so called "titanium ice flawer". But! How easy one can read time on Merkur white sub-dial even at small size, and how terribly bad readability of time at WD. Both beautiful, but merkur is Watch and the WD just bijouterie. And doesn't matter, that quartz WD with vh31 is more accurate than mechanical Merkur with Hangzhou 28800 tourbillon. Hands on the WD surface just vanishing over the motley dial.
What do you think, which one is better?