Terry George never had any telephone calls with Michael Jackson.
A few months ago I wrote my first post about Terry George, but I felt it was very poorly written, so I decided to rewrite it without all the fluff and simply to refute it.
- Terry himself doesn’t know when the calls started:
Every time Terry tries to explain when the calls started, he ends up contradicting himself
The original story (1993):
Louis, Martin & Michael (2003):
Sky News Interview (2009):
https://reddit.com/link/1vqkd0w/video/wsx6wshhkujh1/player
As you can see, we went from the calls starting several days later after Terry’s interview with Michael (an interview that took place on February 19, 1979) to the calls starting just the day after that interview and not only that, but Terry tells us that Michael had even left Leeds, and then the story changes again to say that the calls actually began BEFORE Michael appeared on the show Swap Shop (Terry also tells us that he actually visited Michael for almost an entire week).
But wasn’t Michael supposed to have already left Leeds the very next day after the interview, just as Terry himself told us? How is it possible that Terry visited him when he was no longer there?
And speaking of the show Swap Shop, Michael did appear on that show (or rather, The Jacksons appeared on that show) what Terry doesn't tell you is that the episode actually aired on February 10, 1979, nine days before Terry even met Michael.
So, as you can see, Terry himself doesn't know when those calls started
After the alleged inappropriate call, we're told that Terry and Michael lost contact (around mid-May 1979, which would mean almost 3 months of contact: late February, March, April, and mid-May), and in the Sky News clip, you can see Terry saying that their calls actually took place almost all year long (an obvious lie), this brings us to my next two points.
- Multiple visits in 1979:
We touched on this topic briefly in the previous point, so this one will be shorter.
Untitled Interview (2005):
Sky News Interview (2009):
https://reddit.com/link/1vqkd0w/video/z7vwlgn80vjh1/player
Now we see how we go from Terry visiting Michael two days after the interview to almost an entire week during which Michael introduced Terry to all of his family. (Don't forget that Terry had also told us that Michael left Leeds the day after the interview.)
- Two meetings in 1983:
Terry and the media want you to believe that Terry and Michael met again only once in 1983, but in fact it happened twice
The original story (1993):
Michael Jackson's Secret World (2005):
Back in 1983, I'm sure there were two meetings, judging by the clothes they're wearing.
Oh, and we even have a news article from that time
Please note that there is no mention of Terry having been friends with Michael (or even of the alleged phone call recordings).
Plus a mention of a second interview that we only heard about in this article.
However, later on, Terry himself tells us a different story, this time about what happened in 1983
Sky News Interview (2009):
https://reddit.com/link/1vqkd0w/video/faphlxzaavjh1/player
Whether it's true or false (probably false), Terry has told us here that Michael actually even gave him a song instead of rejecting him when he was trying to rekindle their friendship, as he had mentioned in his tabloid story, although this is the first and last time he has mentioned this demo.
- Hours of phone conversations
Whenever Terry is asked about his 1979 interview, he always ends up telling you that he has hours of recorded phone conversations, yet we’ve never heard a single snippet of them and later on (probably anticipating that he’d be asked if he had that tape, Terry got rid of it in a very… stupid way).
In my previous post, I received a comment saying that Terry might have been referring to phone calls in general, but the way Terry phrased his response “the tape” and the 'fact' that the media has it, is what makes it really, really obvious to me that he's talking about the inappropriate recording.
When you really think about what this means, that's when you realize this was the stupidest thing he could have said I mean... the media has the tape (even worse, the sensationalist tabloids have the tape) in which Michael speaks inappropriately to Terry, and they've never published it in over 30 years. Yeah, that makes sense.
- The phone bill doesn't make sense
Aside from the fact that the amount on the bill changed from £340 to £300 to £350, there’s also the fact that it was Michael who called Terry, not the other way around.
(In case you don’t understand, Back in 1979 with international calls, the person making the call is the one who is charged; therefore, Michael is the one who should have received the bill, not Terry.)
https://reddit.com/link/1vqkd0w/video/3f61ozt9mvjh1/player
Whenever Terry talks about being the one who called Michael, he always refers to those occasions as if he were already reversing charges or calling from a phone box (this was after the alleged inappropriate call and after he received the £300 bill which is extremely convenient, because once the inappropriate call occurs, the number of calls starts to decrease over the next few days, and within a few days, their phone service is cut off. It couldn't have happened during the previous months, when they were supposedly talking 2 to 3 times a week from 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. on some occasions.)
Well, that brings us to the end. I apologize if at any point this post seems poorly written; I tried to make it as clear and easy to understand as possible (even though I used a translator). As you can see, Terry’s story is riddled with inconsistencies and contradictions, I have more points to make about him as the opportunist that he is, but for now we’ll leave it at that, since this post is meant to refute the claim that he had phone calls with Michael.
