Popular MJ Twitter Account andjustice4some AKA AJ has passed away
RIP. I knew a lot of the facts from this account when first diving into them.
RIP. I knew a lot of the facts from this account when first diving into them.
A lot of guilters try to bring up things like one of the officers saying the 1993 description matched, or the prosecution claiming to have a nude photograph of Jonathan Spence. But the police were notorious for lying to try to drum up evidence. Michael’s lawyers even sent them a letter about it.
“In response to mounting legal pressure, lawyers for Michael Jackson accused police officers of telling outrageous lies and of using any device to generate potential evidence against the entertainer.
I am advised that your officers have told frightened youngsters outrageous lies, such as, ‘We have nude photos of you’ in order to push them into making accusations against Mr. Jackson,” lawyer Bertram Fields wrote in an Oct. 28 letter to Police Chief Willie L. Williams. “There are, of course, no such photos of these youngsters, and they have no truthful accusations to make. But your officers appear ready to employ any device to generate potential evidence against Mr. Jackson.”
This was reported in the Los Angeles Times on November 17, 1993.
This wasn’t the first (or only) time the police lied in the case. For example, they falsely told Jason Francia (Michael’s maid’s son) that Corey Feldman and Macaulay Culkin had been abused and that only he could be the hero who would help put Michael in the spotlight and save them.
The police also went to Jolie Levine’s door, Michael’s assistant, and claimed they had nude photographs of her child, which turned out to be a complete lie. They then leaked it to the newspapers and said she had called Michael a pedophile, which she never did.
Tom Sneddon approached Joy Robson and did the exact same thing. He asked if her faith in Jackson would change if she knew he had a photograph of her son naked. Joy Robson responded that her opinion would not change because she knew there were no such photographs.
Another revealing detail: the police tipped off Diane Dimond about the Arvizo case before Neverland was raided. She teased “a great story” to Court TV executives to get financing to film the raid and was later named “Chief Executive Investigator.” Court TV never disclosed that Dimond was writing a book throughout the 2004-2005 case using state sources.
I also uncovered something that isn’t widely discussed: Tom Sneddon’s raid on the Beverly Hills office of Bradley Miller, a private investigator working with Michael Jackson’s defense. This happened hours before Jackson’s arrest and violated attorney-client privilege because Miller was gathering information for the defense. California law at the time allowed searches of offices but required strict procedures, such as appointing a neutral special master to review materials for privileged content, which the prosecutors bypassed. Sneddon knew about Miller’s ties to the defense and had even surveilled the building beforehand. This was essentially a sneak attack timed with the other searches and arrests to overwhelm the defense.
In conclusion, for people who think this case was clean-cut and that the police were saints who didn’t lie about anything, they are totally wrong. The police tried many times to thwart the defense and take shortcuts to find evidence against Michael Jackson using immoral tactics, such as claiming to children and their parents that they had nude photographs of them, tipping off a reporter about a raid, and more.
Sources and other information:
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1993-11-17-me-57719-story.html
https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/tom-sneddon-was-a-sneaky-man-swipe.2806849/
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2005/jun/13/michaeljackson.michaeljacksontrial5
Not necessarily sure why I’m sharing this but still, it’s so odd seeing him with Wade knowing Wade would on 11 years or so later betray him for some money.
mj didnt have connections to NAMBLA, whoever approved this shit definitely does though 😭
So chilling. Baldwin would pass away in 1987, but he was more right than he’d ever know.
A reminder that you can’t separate the discussion on MJ’s treatment by the media/the public from race.
I’m a bit worried on how they’re going to do the second movie, when this movie came out Netflix released a documentary about the trial AND the cascios made a documentary as well, and I will always remember how they destroyed my excitement and happiness, it felt like we were back in the 80s with all the michaelmania and love he was getting.
Now for the second movie, how are they going to talk about the allegations? I heard they’re not allowed to portray the 1993 one, that’s the one Michael ‘paid off’ (he didn’t want to but no one is gonna listen to that) so it’ll look suspicious if they skip that one and only show the trial.
What if they release more docs after it comes out, or what if social media randomly switches up on him, they love doing that, they show a celebrity so much love them randomly switch up and hate on them, I really don’t think I can stomach that, maybe I’m being dramatic but idk, the cascios and Netflix ended up getting no attention but I’m scared this one will cause an outrage and people will say they’re ‘whitewashing’ the story
I honestly don’t get why some MJ fans keep comparing Omer to Michael when he’s made it pretty clear that he doesn’t like it.
People keep commenting things like, “You’re just like MJ” or “You look like MJ.” He’s clearly uncomfortable with those comparisons and just wants to be himself, and that’s completely fair. Especially for someone who has been living such a public life, it makes sense that he’d want to distance himself from that pressure and be known for who he is.
I also don’t get why some fans want him to post more MJ related content. I know guilters think he despises MJ or stays quiet because they believe he was abused, and they constantly troll him over it. But why do some fans also expect him to make his online presence all about Michael?
I personally think he doesn’t owe MJ fans anything. If anything, staying close to MJ’s kids and nephews means far more than posting about Michael online.
This is why I can't truly be apart of that fandom because they keep using stupid-ass counter arguments against guilters, and they're lowkey similar. They keep using the Epstien File logic, They keep saying "it was fine for him to sleep with children because he's acting like Peter Pan"(yes this is a real comment), They say that "Michael Jackson was an PERFECT human being", and they say that that mugshot of him was A.I./Photoshopped. I really ain't trying to sound like a guilter when I say that, but I really can't be apart of something like that if it just gonna be blatant lies and trying to cover for one side just like how guilters do it.
I know this isn’t an uncommon opinion or thought but the fact that these allegations have ruined his reputation hurts me so badly.
I don’t live in America or the UK and people outside of those two countries don’t really care much about the allegations but like I wanted to mention Michael Jackson around my cousin, (whos so chronically online and is the type of person who cancels celebs over anything) and I got worried she’d say something negative.
I love mj so much and I do believe he’s innocent but I hate how I’ve been noticing that under every comment section there’s always one person mentioning the allegations, or how in some articles they say mj was a musical genius but did horrible things in life.
YES he’s been proven innocent in court and the 1993 allegations (which he stupidly paid) were brought up and he was acquitted of them but like the 2019 doc still bothers me, it’s the reason why many people switched up after he died and the reason why there’s another s-b on this app that hates him and believes he’s guilty.
I wish I can go back in time and make sure this never happened.
I was also watching a tik tok video about a guy talking about famous make abusers and one comment said ‘make a vid about mj’ 💔💔💔 why did this have to happen.
He would’ve been the perfect pop star with the perfect legacy, he was so nice and donated so much money and talked about climate change and racism, unlike many celebs
As an autistic person these days existing is hard because everyone does an over analysis of what your doing and why, I feel Michael's pain when it comes to that
Such as people assuming he's gay because he's playing with a male friend of his,
Or him simply playing with kids and interacting with them to any meaningful degree
Or anything with the trial.
Anything and everything combed through for the littlest detail.
Sometimes people just do things with no motive behind them, But why do you think people think he always has a motive behind them?
Sorry to yell at u like that but Like what makes these people think Michael was grooming the world? Like I don’t get it? Nobody ever talked about how nice he was, or how charitable he was, it was always “Molestation!” “Plastic surgery!” “Wacko Jacko!” Like where the fuck was the grooming? I don’t get it.
Also this completely destroys that scene at the end of leaving neverland where Wade burns all of his Michael Jackson stuff 💀, motherfucker sold all the shit that had value 😂
I've seen tons of stories about what it was like to be a fan during the 93' case and the 05' trail.
But I see very few stories about what it was it like being a fan when LN came out.
I was young, and wasn't that deep in the online space at the time due to my age. o So while I was a fan, I had no the idea of what the severity of the situation.
How did yall take it when the doc was first released?
Was it hostile to talk about MJ online?
Was their judgement from non MJ-fan peers for still being a fan?
Was there as much resources for his innocence then, as we have now?
Did any have you your doubts? If so, what caused you to conclude to his innocence?
Sometimes I do think about that.
Yep another rant only because I need to get all of this out
Be honest haters and accusers and lairs you know who Michael was on the deep inside but instead of telling the truth you just want to go around and lie for attention and money
IM SICK OF IT!!!!!!
If anything you should be thanking Michael and be grateful you even got to spend a damn second with him you know how many fans would have love to spend time with Michael let alone be around him?!
But no lairs gotta make tens and thousands of documentaries fake stories on social media make Michael into somthing that he ain’t and this goes farther than the allegations they say he was horrible to animals said he wanted to be white go as far to say he hated black people they also said he hated Jews and Arabs even one little girl asking him if it was true he didn’t like Arabs
Like damn according to the accusers he hated every race but white
TELL ME HOW THE HELL THAT MAKES SENSE WHEN HE WOULD SING AGAINST RACISM
And how can he hate black people and only want white children when he’s black himself
You haters know who he is and what he’s proud of
He loves children
He loves animals
He’s proud of his race
He loves all races and people
But noo you wanna turn all that into lies saying none of this is true
Well let me tell you something and as crazy as I’m gonna sound
Me and many feel like we know him more than the actual people around him
And supporters in Michael’s life give yourselves a pat on the back for telling the truth and not making up bs about Michael
Oh yeah very nice timing for releasing a trash documentary when you know the biopic is doing EVER SO WELL
So I’m going to ask you nicely
Please….
LEAVE MICHAEL ALONE!!!!!!!
The reason why I said this is because what if that photo was never revealed to the public, I believe we'd be seeing less guilter videos, less Cascio topics, and less negative attention this year. I lowkey feel like the Epstein files have turned people away from MJ and because of that, we have seen an increase in hate. BUT at the same time and think most of the hate is just larp because the movie's out and its the biggest biopic ever.
Just my theory.
The 1993 article reads:
NEW YORK – Police arrested the husband of singer LaToya Jackson Tuesday night and charged him with beating her with a dining room chair during a dispute in their posh East Side apartment…
(Article excerpt.)
Interestingly enough, three years later, in 1996, LaToya Jackson filed for divorce and again accused Jack Gordon of abusing her. A Las Vegas article reads:
LaToya Jackson is using a new federal law to accuse her estranged husband Jack Gordon of repeatedly beating her into performing topless…
(Article excerpt.)
This is proof for all the guilters who say LaToya lied about Jack Gordon abusing her. If they want to admit he abused her but claim he only pressured her into saying what she already knew about Michael, that’s still incredibly hypocritical.
They choose to believe James Safechuck and Wade Robson, and willingly accept them as “victims,” and constantly say we should believe all victims. Yet they didn’t extend that same belief to LaToya when she came forward as a victim herself. They believed her when she said things that fit their narrative of abuse, but the moment she revealed she had been abused and manipulated, their moral high ground of “believing every victim” suddenly disappeared because it no longer fit their narrative.
There’s also an interview from the ‘90s where an interviewer catches LaToya being fed what to say through an earpiece, after which she storms out. Combined with the documented abuse, police reports, her later divorce filings, and the Jackson family’s public concern for her mental and physical health years before she recanted, it paints a much more complete picture than dismissing her as a liar.
Articles and interview:
https://lasvegassun.com/news/1996/jun/25/latoya-jackson-claims-she-was-violated-by-husband/
Thomas Mesereau is a very interesting person and I deeply hope he writes an autobiography one day, he's lead a very interesting life.
This is the video I watched https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EK5oMhA6Eco