
u/Secretive_Crusher

Sensitive Soci3ty defend's MJ in the EDP445 Video
go to 8:04
Has anyone noticed this?
Why does it seem like almost every 10 years, there's a new allegation?
1993: Chandlers
2003: Arvizos
2013: Wade Robson/Safechuck
2023: Cascio Family
Not trying to sound conspiratorial, but something just don't sit right with me about this.
QUIT PLAYING WITH HIM RAHHHHH!!!!!!!!
billboard.comThis video also debunks the 60 Min/Cascio claim that MJ was using drugs
youtu.beDaphne Barak using MJ music in a recent insta post
seriously can't make this shit up
the next slide is my reaction btw
Dan Reed's twitter is weird af
im not sure he did this himself or what, but this is what it look like
Guilters and Pedo-romanticism
One thing I've noticed from people like these (not all of them btw) is that when they describe his "victims", they use words like "attractive", "beautiful", "sexy" etc. This is weird because if you're describing a supposed "child molester" and things he's doing, then why are you describing the victims in a sexual characteristics? They've also used the statement of "they was in love with each other" and "lovers" which again, is very strange wording of alleged SA. They always like to say "if it wuz ur child, wud you lik to sleep in the bed with him??" but my counter to that is "if it was anyone else, would use the term "loving" and "making love" to describe an SA? All of this boils down to me as some sort of fetish where it's almost like they envision MJ SA'ing kids, and I know that sounds disgusting but that what it sounds like to me, and not only sounds like it, but looks like it tbh. I took a lot of psychology classes to realize that people like that are people in the branch of pedophilia or some kind of philia where fantasizing about adults molesting children, but its "cool" for them if they thinking about it to use it against him.
How do yall feel about the "agnostic" approach to MJ?
Lately, I've been seeing video essays and documentaries about his personal character. They all (well, most of them) say the same thing about the allegations, "We can't say he did it, We can't say he didn't do it". Like the recent Volksgeist video, although I think its a good video he said that "if you believe he was a predator, if you believe he had age regression and if you believe he was a normal person, you are all right in some fashion" and that kinda rubbed me weirdly.
What do yall think?
This whole message proves that the Arvizo family was lying
"Letter to Mr John Branca"
I hope someone actually does send this to the estate
Guilters and Pedo-romanticism
LONG POST:
One thing I've noticed from people like these (not all of them btw) is that when they describe his "victims", they use words like "attractive", "beautiful", "sexy" etc. This is weird because if you're describing a supposed "child molester" and things he's doing, then why are you describing the victims in a sexual characteristics? They've also used the statement of "they was in love with each other" and "lovers" which again, is very strange wording of alleged SA. They always like to say "if it wuz ur child, wud you lik to sleep in the bed with him??" but my counter to that is "if it was anyone else, would use the term "loving" and "making love" to describe an SA? All of this boils down to me as some sort of fetish where it's almost like they envision MJ SA'ing kids, and I know that sounds disgusting but that what it sounds like to me, and not only sounds like it, but looks like it tbh. I took a lot of psychology classes to realize that people like that are people in the branch of pedophilia or some kind of philia where fantasizing about adults molesting children, but its "cool" for them if they thinking about it to use it against him.
MJ innocent.
How disrespectful can you get bruh 🤦🏾♂️
Being a guilter is one thing, but literally adding his death photo is absolutely disrespectful and then have the nerve to have Prince in ur pfp.
This reply I found under a guilter's comment in MJ facts video
The major red flag missed is how the media keep giving these scam cases credibility. Soon as someone accuses MJ, it's accepted as a fact with no investigation of "does this make sense." It's he has 10 accusers. lol Let's breakdown what the media should have considered breaking down each case 1 by 1.
- Wade said it happened on Day 1 of meeting MJ which contradicts the idea of "grooming." lol
- No mention of that 1993 case where Evan Chandler, who was an aspiring Movie Director/Dentist drugged Jordy with Sodium Amytal to get him to say MJ molested him as he always said Nothing happened until that happened.
- No mention of how James Safechuck killed the entire LN with his claims of molested from 12 to 14 on 1990 to 1992 on the 2nd floor of Michael's Train House. There is one big problem, the train house was not built until August 1994 as permits proved. lol
- Back when MJ went on his Dangerous Tour, Wade Robson's mother, was angry at MJ for not calling Wade when he was 7. MJ was on his Dangerous Tour overseas and Wade's mother, Joy, stated she was so angry at MJ for disappointing Wade as he sat at the phone all day waiting for MJ's call. She got so mad she said she was would cut off MJ for 6 months for "breaking Wade's heart." lol Who is really doing the grooming.
- Wade Robson dated Michael Jackson's niece Brandi Jackson for 7 years and Brandi posted how the relationship ended when Wade cheated on her with Britany Spears. lol
- When MJ had his Criminal Trial in 2005, Wade was very supportive and testified UNDER OATH when he didn't even have to and said MJ never molested him. Yet we now except lying under oath in a criminal case where people have pleaded the 5th?
- LN tried to sell MJ cutoff the boy when he moved to the next not realizing when Michael married Lisa Marie, James Safechuck and his mother were in Budapest when Lisa Marie and MJ had just gotten married and MJ was filming the trailer for History album. James who was 16 almost 17, is on footage carrying MJ's unbrella to shield him from the sun as Michael and Lisa Marie walked. MJ gave him odd jobs like that because he always believed if he hired you, you had to work. That gets rid of the notion of MJ paying off his family. lol He was an umbrella boy. lol
- Wade Robson wrote in MJ's Opus for his funeral stating "Michael is one of the main reasons I believe in the Goodness of human kind."
- Wade danced in a Janet Jackson tribute to MJ on MTV.
- Wade Robson stated in an interview BEFORE he changed his story that Michael never trusted anyone.
- Wade Robson was not selected to perform in Michael Jackson's One in Vegas in 2011 and that's when he remembered he was molested.
- The Arvizo case went to trial in 2005 with the child testifying and they still lost! Do you know why? The mother's lies caught up with them. They claimed abduction at Neverland when receipts were produced of them out at restaurant and she was getting a body wax. Let's not forget the timeline of their accusation from the ACTUAL trial. They claimed AFTER the doc aired, MJ abducted them and it was at THIS TIME MJ molested Gavin for the FIRST TIME. So he knew them from 2000 to 2003, the doc aired with all the controversy and they claimed at this time, MJ kidnapped them and molested the child and they tried to escape Neverland in MJ's hot air balloon (this story disappeared off the internet). The escape in MJ's hot air balloon story disappeared off the internet as well as she reached out to the Santa Barbara Police in 2000 to discuss "settling with Michael" before she ever met him.
- Now we have the ENTIRE Cascio family of children, both boys and girls, claiming MJ molested all of them. Yet, the entire family were on Oprah in 2011, I have the entire show, and they talk glowingly of MJ as their 2nd family. How he stayed in their home and even took out the garbage and he would NEVER do anything like that. Now they changed their story??? So no one ask about the changing stories????
This is the best reply ever, although I disagree with the sodium story.
Turns out SOME people actually think's the 'Nevermind' album cover is CP, lmao
Here's what they say:
"People are dismissing this guy because his case is alive again?! He only got dismissed the first time because of the statute of limitations. The defendants re-releasing the album with that cover opened the door back up for him. Don’t fault this guy for wanting a piece of something he was sort of the face of that made a lot of people tens of millions of dollars and him literally nothing. And certainly don’t blame him for the band and labels arrogance and stupidity in committing the same potential crime again.
I’m the last one to support frivolous lawsuits. This guy has some valid points."
"Kurt's journal entries really do cast this entire matter in a different light. After looking at the journal entries and seeing the full story, I believe the cover should be changed and the victim compensated far more than what he is asking."
"Plenty of money to go around, the label will probably pay and can afford it. Good luck to him."
WHAT ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT 😭😭😭😭