u/KaKaShi---143

Now that the women are slowly getting into the workforce, I wanna ask how many of you are willing to have a house husband who willingly wants to do the thing?

Now this isn't any random guy who just hates to work, the guy is actually willing and does the job he says he will, regardless of any pressure by anyone. Cooking, cleaning the house, washing the clothes, laundry, taking care of kids (if they have), and everything else.

Hi. I can speak and understand English fairly well but I'm not a native speaker. I can mostly describe what I'm thinking in words but if I need to describe something in detail about a specific thing which can be anything, say for example, a mansion. I can only put into words like this is a huge mansion. But I don't know the words to describe it, like the lights in the garden, the scenery or something like that. This happens in a great deal of things. I don't know the words. How do I fix it? I actually read a lot too. Do I read a specific encyclopedia or dictionary? What else can I do? Do you use some software to find words that match your description?

Hiii....I'm currently reading the complete works of William Shakespeare. I've read the complete comedy and history plays. It took me around 6 months , I, really enjoyed it. But the thing is I didn't read shakespeare at all...I read the modern adaptations by litcharts.com but I still got the plot just not the language...

Then i realised it and then read 6 plays in original: Two Noble Kinsmen , Tragedy of Arden of Faversham, Double Falsehood , Sir Thomas More, Edward iii and then started the tragedy with Macbeth....but the thing is I feel really slow and the plays itself don't catch my attention, I spend most of the time reading the old english. I actually liked the modern adaptations more . I know about the word plays , puns , sarcasms that shakespeare is known for , but idk for me modern adaptations feel more fun. Am I doing anything wrong?? Is it ok if i continue just reading the modern adaptations if I don't really care about the language itself?

First pee after sleep smells . Why?

I've been wondering whether there's a generally accepted definition of an author's "complete works."

For example, if someone says they've read the complete works of Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, or Nietzsche, what is usually understood to be included?

Is it only the books the author published during their lifetime? Or does it also extend to posthumously published material, unfinished manuscripts, notebooks, letters, essays, journalism, lectures, fragments, and other archival writings?

Do publishers, literary scholars, or collectors generally agree on what constitutes an author's "complete works," or does it vary from author to author and edition to edition?

I'm dying for the answer , when can you honestly say you've read an author's complete works?

I've been wondering whether there's a generally accepted definition of an author's "complete works."

For example, if someone says they've read the complete works of Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, or Nietzsche, what is usually understood to be included?

Is it only the books the author published during their lifetime? Or does it also extend to posthumously published material, unfinished manuscripts, notebooks, letters, essays, journalism, lectures, fragments, and other archival writings?

Do publishers, literary scholars, or collectors generally agree on what constitutes an author's "complete works," or does it vary from author to author and edition to edition?

I'm dying for the answer , when can you honestly say you've read an author's complete works?

I've been wondering whether there's a generally accepted definition of an author's "complete works."

For example, if someone says they've read the complete works of Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, or Nietzsche, what is usually understood to be included?

Is it only the books the author published during their lifetime? Or does it also extend to posthumously published material, unfinished manuscripts, notebooks, letters, essays, journalism, lectures, fragments, and other archival writings?

Do publishers, literary scholars, or collectors generally agree on what constitutes an author's "complete works," or does it vary from author to author and edition to edition?

I'm dying for the answer, when can you honestly say you've read an author's complete works?