u/Kaesar_Vincer

Before explaining the situation, I want to add a bit of context on how employment process usually is in my country (Kazakhstan): there is a common practice when an employee on probation is only given a civil contract and they only sign an employment contract in case of successful probation (which usually lasts for 3 month, the longest period allowed by law). There are multiple reasons why companies do this:

• Getting an officially contracted employee terminated is kind of a headache, while poor performance is recognised as a basis for termination it can be hard to actually enforce this since it would require frequent attestation or examination and most companies don't bother with those. So hiring someone with a civil contract actually makes it easier to fire someone during probation;
• An employee is eligible for paid leave and medical insurance, but only if they signed an employment contract. Unused paid leave days must also be compensated in case of employment termination regardless of cause (even if it was employee-initiated). Civil contracts allow companies to cut costs since they are not obligated to pay or compensate anything in case of termination.

This practice was made illegal in September 2025, forcing an employer to provide an employment contract if there are signs of employment relationship (fixed work schedule, for example).

Getting back to my predicament: I got a job in November 2025 and was on probation (civil contract) which was supposed to end in early March 2026, but was fired in February for 'not meeting the expectations'. I've only recently started job searching again and when getting feedback from recruiters one thing they always ask is why I left the previous company. My current answer is that it was only a temporary role with an opportunity to get a permanent position, but the department couldn't get the approval from the company's higher-ups to open said position. A similar thing was happening in other departments so it didn't seem that far-fetched to me atleast. If they ask to elaborate on the gap I say that I had a teaching practice in my university (I'm studying for master's degree and I was obligated to pass the pedagogical practice by curriculum).

However, as of recently I started doubting that this explanation sounds convincing and now I have a question: how do I explain leaving the previous company (and the resulting gap) without making it seem like I am a bad employee? The only options I thought of are:

• Sticking with the current explanation, but as I said, I'm not entirely sure it's convincing enough;
• Saying I needed to take care of my father after a medical emergency. This isn't exactly false: my dad had surgery last year and me and my mom were taking care of him while he was recovering. He has fully recovered by now, but also had several checkups and doctor visits last month and will possibly need to be hospitalized again.