Why is it so hard to have a general consensus on Mexico's history?
I am Mexican and as of late, I can't help but notice inconsistencies and wildly different information and opinions everywhere I look, some go back before Mexico even existed.
- Whether the spaniards brought "civilization" to the "uncivilized" indigenous peoples
- Whether the Porfiriato was good or not, a does-the-end-justify-the means question I guess
- More recent stuff, such as if the Salinas de Gortari election was manipulated. This one is more explainable if we account corruption, but still.
Not having a solid historical "objective" consensus is so demoralizing and makes manipulating people much easier.
I understand that one political party being in charge for nearly half a century has something to do with it, but what else?