Murdle Book - Liar/Truth statements feel like "trial and error"
I cant shake this feeling like these 1 liar, 2 truths statements are simply a "trial and error" type. Dont get me wrong, there are some examples where you can immediately tell that they contradict each other but more often I see myself simply running a "trial and error" on which one is false and which ones aren't. I will place a F,T,T - T,F,T and T,T,F scenarios and just run them visually through the grid. Sometimes that is a bit hard so i will use a pencil and visualize the scenario but this just feels wrong and not how logic puzzles should be done. I am comparing this to Puzzle Barons Logic Puzzles app. I have solved a bunch of puzzles there and not one of them had this "true/false"shit. Also, all of them were solvable with just deduction based on the grid. I am curious what are your thoughts on this matter. Am i simply doing these wrong or what? Does it feel a bit like cheating to you as well?