Are Jainism, Buddhism, and Sikhism Different Religions, or Are They Part of Hinduism?
Please read this all
I've often come across debates about whether Jains, Buddhists, and Sikhs should be considered Hindus.
Although these religions originated in the Indian subcontinent and their founders were born into societies that were largely influenced by Hindu traditions, they also have their own scriptures, philosophies, beliefs, practices, and religious identities.
Another point that makes this discussion interesting is that many followers of these religions consider themselves members of independent religions. For example, many Sikhs identify Sikhism as a distinct and separate faith.
There are also significant theological differences between these traditions. Sikhism is generally described as a monotheistic religion that emphasizes belief in one God, while many forms of Hinduism include the worship of multiple deities. Buddhism, on the other hand, is often viewed as a non-theistic religion because its teachings do not center on the worship of a creator God.
If followers of these religions see themselves as belonging to independent faiths, should Jainism, Buddhism, and Sikhism still be considered branches of Hinduism, or should they be viewed as entirely separate religions?
I'm interested in hearing historical, religious, and cultural perspectives on this topic. Please keep the discussion respectful and factual.