Not compliments. Not upvotes. Not friends saying cool idea.
I mean the first signal that made you think someone genuinely had the problem badly enough to use or pay for it.
Feels like that moment usually teaches more than months of building.
[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]
People usually do not wake up wanting new software.
They complain about lost follow ups, messy handoffs, slow replies, forgotten context, and leads going cold.
That is what I am building Leadline around. It finds Reddit posts where people are already describing those problems before they start searching for a tool.
Most demos look good now.
The real problem is finding businesses already asking for that exact workflow.
That is what I am building Leadline around. It finds Reddit posts where people are already asking for tools, fixes, automations, or alternatives, so you can start from demand instead of guessing.
After talking to a lot of teams with long sales cycles, I keep seeing the same pattern.
The CRM gets built around dashboards and management reporting first.
Then six months later the sales team quietly moves back to spreadsheets, WhatsApp, sticky notes, and inbox archaeology because updating the CRM feels like extra work instead of useful work.
The setups that actually survive seem way simpler:
Clear stages
One owner
Next action visible
Conversation context centralized
No skipping steps
No giant field graveyards nobody updates
Honestly the hardest part is not choosing the CRM. It is designing a workflow people will consistently use when things get messy.
Been building around intent and conversation workflows myself with Leadline:
https://leadline.dev
Curious what CRM mistakes people here see most often in the real world.
The mistake is falling in love with the idea before finding people already complaining about the problem.
Reddit is actually useful for this because people describe problems way more honestly than they do on landing page surveys.
I’ve been using Leadline more for this lately to check if an idea has real demand before building around it.
Drop your idea and I’ll tell you what kind of Reddit demand I’d look for first.
The mistake is thinking a small product means a small marketing problem.
You can build something useful in a weekend and still have no idea where the first real buyers are hiding.
I’ve been using Leadline more for this lately to find Reddit posts where people are already asking for a tool or workaround.
What are you building right now, and where do you think your first users are?
I keep seeing people ship solid no code SaaS products that never reach users because nobody figured out where the buyers already hang out.
The stack usually is not the real problem anymore. Attention is.
Been testing Leadline for this lately to find Reddit posts where people are actively asking for the exact thing a product solves before trying to market it everywhere.
What’s been harder for you lately, building or getting users?
The mistake is building agents around tasks instead of pain people already have.
An agent sounds cool until nobody is actively looking for that workflow.
I’ve been using Leadline more for this lately to check Reddit demand before building too far. If people are already complaining about the problem, the agent has a better shot.
What kind of agent are you building right now?
Vibe coding makes it easy to keep moving. You can add auth, rebuild the UI, fix weird edge cases, connect payments, clean the database, and still avoid the harder question of whether anyone is already looking for the thing you are building.
That is what I have been checking earlier with Leadline. Before putting another week into a feature, I look for Reddit threads where people are already describing the problem, asking for tools, comparing bad options, or hacking together workarounds.
For vibe coded projects, I think that signal matters more than another polished demo. If the demand is real, you can usually find it in messy posts before you finish the clean version.
No code makes it very easy to get from idea to product, which is useful, but it also makes it easier to skip the uncomfortable part. You can spend days building dashboards, workflows, auth, payments, and onboarding before knowing if the problem is real enough for someone to actively look for a solution.
That is what I have been using Leadline for before going too far into an idea. Instead of only asking other builders for feedback, I look for Reddit threads where people are already complaining about the problem, asking for alternatives, or describing the exact workflow the SaaS is supposed to fix.
For no code founders, I think this matters because speed can hide weak demand. A polished MVP still needs a buyer who was already trying to solve the problem before they saw your landing page.
A lot of AI CRM products start by promising cleaner notes, automated follow ups, better summaries, smarter scoring, or less manual admin. Those are useful, but they only matter if the sales team already feels that specific workflow breaking.
That is the part I have been checking with Leadline before assuming a tool has demand. Instead of starting from CRM features, I look for Reddit threads where salespeople, founders, or operators are already complaining about messy pipelines, missed follow ups, bad handoffs, duplicate data, or tools nobody actually updates.
For AI CRM builders, I think those messy complaint threads are more useful than broad feedback like sounds interesting. They show what people are already trying to fix, what language they use, and whether the problem is annoying enough to search for a better way.
The pattern I keep noticing is teams spending months improving workflows, prompts, automations, dashboards, and integrations without knowing whether the underlying problem is painful enough for people to actively search for a solution.
That sounds obvious, but I think a lot of AI builders accidentally validate interest from other builders instead of validating demand from actual operators, agencies, founders, sales teams, support teams, or whoever the end user really is.
I have been using Leadline for this because Reddit is one of the few places where people openly describe operational problems in detail. Instead of relying on generic market research, I look for threads where people are already complaining about the exact workflow the tool is supposed to improve.
The interesting part is that demand usually looks messy at first. It shows up as frustration, workaround discussions, comparison posts, or someone asking if a better tool exists yet. Those conversations are often more useful than polished feedback forms or fake waitlist hype.
the annoying tradeoff with AI agents is that almost anything can look useful in a demo.
Then you try to find the exact person who has that workflow, feels the pain enough, and is willing to try a new tool.
That part is way harder.
I am building Leadline around this problem. Finding demand before pretending the product has a market.
What has been the best signal that your agent is solving something people actually care about?
AI agents are weird because the demo can look impressive way before the actual buyer problem is clear.
You can build something that clicks through a workflow, drafts emails, updates a CRM, pulls data from a few tools, writes reports, answers support tickets, or does some repetitive admin task.
In a short video, it looks useful.
Then you try to sell it and the hard question shows up.
Who is annoyed by this enough to pay for it every month?
That is where a lot of AI agent projects seem to get stuck. The building part is not always the bottleneck anymore. The bottleneck is proving the workflow is painful enough before you build the agent around it.
I have been using my own software more for that side of things. Not for broad AI agent keywords, but for finding the actual complaints people are already posting.
Messy onboarding, manual reporting, repetitive client updates, missed follow ups, spreadsheet cleanup, support teams answering the same questions all day.
Those are usually better starting points than saying you built an AI agent for some category.
The agent only matters if the task was already annoying.
Feels like the strongest AI agent ideas now start with a boring workflow people already hate, not with what the model can technically do.
A startup idea can sound good and still have zero clear buyer pull.
Drop the idea and who you think would use it.
I will give you one Reddit angle I would check first to see if people are already asking for that problem.
Using Leadline.
Building without code removes a lot of friction, but it does not remove the customer problem.
You can ship faster and still have no idea where people are already asking for what you built.
I am testing this with Leadline right now for Reddit demand.
Drop your no code SaaS and I will tell you one buyer search angle I would check first.
Getting users for an AI tool is weird because the product can be useful and still be shown to the wrong people.
A lot of the market is already asking for tools in public. They just do not describe it in clean buyer language.
I have been using Leadline to find Reddit posts where people are already asking for what a tool does.
No hard pitch here. just curious how other AI tool founders are finding users right now.
You can build something technically solid and still get zero traction.
A lot of AI tools start from what is possible, not from what people are already trying to solve. So you end up with something interesting, but not something people are actively looking for.
What has been more useful for me is starting from the opposite side. Find where people are already asking how to do something, what tool to use, or complaining about a current workflow.
Then build or position around that.
I have been testing this with Leadline where it surfaces those kinds of posts so you are not guessing where demand is.
If you are building an AI tool, drop it and I will tell you where I would look for early users.
The mistake with vibe coding is thinking the app being buildable means the idea is worth building.
You can get pretty far now with AI, but distribution still hits the same wall.
I have been testing Leadline for this because Reddit shows the messy version of demand before people turn it into clean startup language.
How are you checking if people actually want the thing before you keep building?