What’s the biggest debate you’re having with yourself heading into your draft or while you’re on the clock? Could be a player you can’t rank correctly, a rookie vs veteran decision, win-now vs rebuild, trading picks, tier breaks, QB strategy in SF, or anything else. Interested to hear what tough calls everyone is struggling with this offseason.
What are your thoughts on this ?
My starting lineup would be Dart, CMC, Kyren Williams, JSN, Egbuka, bowers, DK
What’s an example of a dynasty trade where you knew you overpaid but it ended up paying off? What was the deal, why were you willing to pay above market, and what was your thought process at the time? Curious to hear cases where trusting your evaluation/process mattered more than sticking strictly to value charts.
I’m curious how everyone here evaluates rookie prospects before drafts. Do you rely more on film, analytics, landing spot, draft capital, athletic testing, or just overall gut feel? Also, how successful has your strategy been over the years? Have you won any championships or multiple titles using your approach, or did you have to adjust after too many misses? I’d love to hear what’s actually worked long term for people.
I feel like Lemon is in a much better situation than Tyson and should probably be ranked higher, but almost every rookie draft ranking I see has Tyson going before him. Philly has the better OL, QB, overall offense, and coaching scheme, which feels like a huge advantage for Lemon’s long-term outlook. I get Tyson may have the better individual profile, but situation matters too, especially early in a player’s career. Curious how everyone here views the two players long term and why Tyson seems to consistently get the edge in dynasty rookie drafts.
Edit: would also like to add if Howie Roseman is trading up to get you, that has to mean they have a plan for him. Don’t you trust Roseman over the saints GM?