do you or your colleagues communicate through Claude / LLMs? is it widely common now, and is it culturally acceptable / expected?
I don't mean using them in any capacity to do the work, I mean sending emails / jira comments / instant messages fully and obviously written by them.
by "obviously" I mean that they show all the markings of LLMs:
- bullet points
- bolding and / or paragraph titles
- emdashes
- phrasing that the person would never use naturally (and it's so very obvious when the message isn't in their native language)
- emojis (lots of emojis)
a large proportion of the tickets opened for devops stuff are now entirely written by Claude as well, and regularly are shining examples of confidently incorrect X/Y problems where the ticket brings its own "solution".
just like https://nohello.net/ there are equivalents for this like https://stopsloppypasta.ai and https://406.fail/ but I see more and more of it in my company and it often feels like I'm just talking to the person's claude through two layers of redirection...
our management is fully onboard the AI train, we're encouraged to vibe code and vibe review (but somehow still own the result) so they don't see this as problematic. they have praised people for doing it, even! I'm wondering if this is just how things are now.