Why is Xenagos seen as better than H&A?
Pretty simple question, I’m newish to the game and am struggling to understand why [[Xenagos]] is seen as a better commander than [[Halana and Alena, Partners]]. I would imagine that both allow for similar strategies, but H&A’s buff is permanent, while Xenagos only lasts until end of turn. I know Xenagos is more resilient to removal but it still seems that H&A is more suited for Gruul Stompy Strategies. Maybe I’m missing something.