
Reuters Compared Today’s Rare Earth Situation To 2010. That Should Probably Get More Attention.
One line from the Reuters piece stood out immediately.
Reuters directly compared the current China-Japan rare earth situation to 2010, when China restricted exports during a territorial dispute and shocked global supply chains.
Now it is happening again.
According to Reuters, Japanese companies are already pulling material from stockpiles and scrambling for alternative suppliers because replacing Chinese heavy rare earth supply could take years.
That matters because these materials feed into:
ㅤ• magnets
ㅤ• EV motors
ㅤ• defense systems
ㅤ• semiconductors
ㅤ• robotics
ㅤ• advanced electronics
Feels like every few years the market relearns the same lesson:
critical mineral supply chains are fragile.
Then once prices calm down, everyone forgets again.
Meanwhile governments clearly are not forgetting.
The US, EU, Japan and Canada have all been pushing domestic and allied mineral supply discussions harder over the last couple years.
That is partly why Phil Ehr’s comments around mineral security and strategic copper keep getting more relevant.
Been connecting that theme back to:
CSE: NRED
OTCQB: NREDF
NovaRed is still speculative and early-stage, but the timing around the story is interesting.
Company now has:
ㅤ• Wilmac copper-gold project in BC
ㅤ• MetalCore AI-assisted exploration platform
ㅤ• non-provisional US patent application No. 19/680,101 tied to exploration workflows
Wilmac itself is large:
ㅤ• around 16k hectares
ㅤ• about 160 sq km
ㅤ• roughly 30k football fields
And recent North Lamont work showed:
ㅤ• 43 soil samples
ㅤ• highs up to 379 ppm copper
ㅤ• western cluster averaging around 209 ppm copper
Still no resource and still a long way from proving anything.
But every time China squeezes mineral supply chains, the conversation around domestic and allied sourcing gets louder.
Feels like the market is slowly moving from:
“metals are commodities”
toward:
“metals are infrastructure.”
NFA