Login

r/TheRaceTo10Million

▲ 4 r/TheRaceTo10Million

Quantum Stocks Are Flying, But I Think The Real Sleeper Trade Is Hiding Under The Hardware

The MarketWatch headline about quantum stocks jumping because the Trump administration may be looking to buy into the sector caught my attention for a different reason than most people.

Everyone is treating it like a pure tech headline. Quantum tickers move, traders chase the obvious names, and the conversation immediately becomes about computing power, defense, cybersecurity, simulation, and the next big government-backed technology wave.

That part is exciting, but I think there is a second layer here that is way less talked about.

Quantum computers are not just software. They are physical machines. When you actually look at the hardware, it is full of cryogenic systems, cooling infrastructure, wiring, cabling, shielding, connectors, control electronics, and precision metal components. These things do not look like “cloud apps.” They look like advanced industrial machines.

That is where the metals angle starts to get interesting.

We already saw this pattern with AI. First everyone chased Nvidia, chips, cloud, and data centers. Then the market slowly realized that the AI buildout also needs power, grid upgrades, substations, transformers, cooling, copper, rare metals, and secure supply chains. The deeper you go into the stack, the more physical the story gets.

Quantum could follow a similar path.

If the U.S. government is really talking about around $2 billion in grants and possible stakes in quantum-computing companies, that means quantum is moving closer to strategic infrastructure. And once something becomes strategic, the supply chain behind it starts to matter a lot more.

The obvious mining names are the big ones like FCX and BHP. Freeport-McMoRan is one of the cleanest large copper plays, and BHP gives you global mining scale with copper exposure. Those are probably the safer, more liquid ways to play the broader metals theme.

But the wildcard side is where I think it gets more interesting.

NovaRed Mining, NRED / NREDF, is not a quantum company. It is not a producer either. It is an early-stage copper-gold explorer in British Columbia. But that is kind of the point. Future metal supply does not magically appear when governments suddenly need more critical materials. It starts years earlier with exploration.

Their Wilmac Copper-Gold Project is in the Quesnel porphyry belt in BC, roughly 10 km west of Hudbay’s producing Copper Mountain Mine. The project is about 16,078 hectares, which is around 160 square kilometers, about 39,732 acres, roughly 30,000 football fields, or about 2.7x the size of Manhattan.

That is a real land package for a junior explorer.

The North Lamont work is also worth watching. The soil program had 43 samples, with the highest reported copper soil value at 379 ppm Cu. The western cluster had 9 samples over 150 ppm Cu, averaging 209 ppm Cu. North Lamont is currently a moderate-priority drill target, but the interesting part is that it could move higher after IP/AMT results.

That does not guarantee anything, obviously. Soil samples and geophysics are early-stage signals, not a mine. But in junior exploration, those are exactly the kinds of steps that can build a larger thesis before the market fully understands the target.

I would also put Kodiak Copper and Hercules Metals in the same general “future supply optionality” bucket. Kodiak has the MPD copper-gold project in BC, and Hercules has the Idaho copper exploration angle with Hercules / Leviathan.

The way I see it, quantum is another reminder that high-tech growth is not material-light. AI, quantum, robotics, defense systems, data centers, grid upgrades, and electrification all eventually run into the same physical question:

Where do the metals come from?

Established miners like FCX and BHP are the obvious routes. Explorers like NovaRed, Kodiak, and Hercules are the higher-risk wildcard routes. If Washington keeps funding advanced hardware, I think the market eventually starts looking past the tech headline and into the materials pipeline.

NFA, just sharing my thoughts.

u/ScottMitchellStone26 — 14 hours ago
▲ 8 r/TheRaceTo10Million

UBS Says Copper Prices Could Stay Elevated - That’s A Big Deal For Juniors Like NREDF

One of the biggest commodity stories developing right now is how aggressively institutions are starting to revise copper expectations higher.

UBS just raised its 2026 copper forecast by 13% and increased long-term price projections as well, citing supply constraints and structural demand tied to electrification and energy infrastructure.

Importantly, this is happening while copper is already trading near record levels around $13,000 per tonne.

The bank pointed to continuing disruptions at major mines including Kamoa-Kakula and Grasberg while also highlighting future demand growth from renewables, grids, reshoring, and infrastructure investment.

That’s the critical setup.

The copper market does not necessarily need explosive current shortages immediately. Investors are increasingly focused on what supply looks like several years ahead as AI infrastructure, EVs, power systems, and industrial electrification continue expanding globally.

UBS even noted that inventories may eventually need to be drawn down further before physical tightness fully appears in the market.

That longer-term outlook is exactly why exploration-stage copper companies are becoming more relevant again.

NovaRed Mining (NRED / NREDF) controls the Wilmac Copper-Gold Project in BC’s Quesnel porphyry belt, covering 16,078 hectares approximately 10 km west of Copper Mountain Mine.

Recent North Lamont exploration included copper values up to 379 ppm, while nine western-cluster samples above 150 ppm averaged around 209 ppm copper. Upcoming IP/AMT geophysical work could potentially help refine higher-priority porphyry targets moving forward.

NovaRed also intersects several broader macro themes simultaneously:

Copper demand tied to AI infrastructure.

Canadian critical-mineral security.

AI-assisted exploration through MetalCore.

ESG and governance positioning through Jacob Amsterdam’s advisory role.

NREDF remains speculative with no mine, no resource estimate, and no revenue. But the macro backdrop around copper keeps strengthening. If large institutions continue raising long-term copper forecasts because supply growth cannot keep pace with future demand, junior copper explorers may receive increasing market attention well before actual deficits fully emerge.

reddit.com
u/here4loads — 14 hours ago
▲ 34 r/TheRaceTo10Million

CSE: NRED | OTCQB: NREDF Just Filed A U.S. Patent Around AI-Driven Mineral Exploration, And That Makes The Story Much Bigger Than A Typical Junior Miner

One thing that separates some junior mining companies from others is whether they are simply chasing drill targets or actually trying to build a broader long-term platform.

That is why the newest news from:

• CSE: NRED

• OTCQB: NREDF

caught my attention.

NovaRed just filed a non-provisional U.S. patent application tied to its AI-driven mineral exploration strategy. According to the company, the filing focuses on:

• multi-source geological data integration

• probabilistic scoring models

• AI-assisted target ranking

• blockchain-based document verification

• exploration-data traceability and transparency

Honestly, that is a much bigger vision than a standard junior explorer press release.

The interesting part is that the company is not trying to market AI as some random buzzword attached to mining. The broader mining industry is already moving heavily toward:

• machine-learning exploration

• AI-assisted geological interpretation

• integrated geophysical modeling

• probabilistic target analysis

• data-driven drilling decisions

KoBold Metals is probably the best-known example, but the entire sector increasingly seems headed this way.

NovaRed’s MetalCore platform appears designed around that same macro trend.

The company says MetalCore integrates:

• geology

• geochemistry

• geophysics

• nearby deposits

• historical reports

• structural trends

• property-level datasets

into a probabilistic scoring system intended to rank exploration targets faster and more efficiently.

And the early onboarding numbers were actually pretty notable for a junior mining company:

• 249 applicants shortly after onboarding launch

The patent filing also reportedly involves collaboration with PRAI Inc.’s AI team connected to ecosystems associated with:

• Nvidia

• Google

• Microsoft

• Stanford

• Techstars

• JPMorgan accelerator initiatives

At the same time, NovaRed’s core copper-gold exploration story continues advancing.

Wilmac now includes:

• around 16,078 hectares

• roughly 160 square kilometers

• around 39.7k acres

• roughly 30k football fields

And sits roughly:

• 10 km west of Hudbay Minerals Inc.’s Copper Mountain Mine inside BC’s Quesnel porphyry belt.

Recent technical updates also added:

• copper-in-soil support reportedly up to 1,125 ppm Cu

• North Lamont highs up to 379 ppm Cu

• historical 3DIP/AMT interpretation

• two interpreted intrusive centres

• upward pipe-like porphyry features

• deeper conductivity anomalies

The bullish part for me is that NREDF increasingly feels like a hybrid story sitting at the intersection of:

• copper supply deficits

• AI infrastructure growth

• AI-assisted exploration

• strategic critical minerals

• Canadian copper development

Still speculative obviously. No resource estimate and no producing mine.

But if AI becomes standard infrastructure for future mineral discovery, companies already building proprietary systems around geological data integration could end up with a meaningful long-term edge.

NFA

u/LesBattersby17 — 17 hours ago
▲ 4 r/TheRaceTo10Million

Quantum Stocks Move on Government Capital While Copper Names Stay Early in the Cycle

Hello to all.

Quantum stocks moved sharply after news of roughly $2B in U.S. government-linked investment activity, with companies like IBM seeing over $1B+ allocations and several names posting large single-day gains.

That move reflects how quickly capital is flowing into compute infrastructure tied to national security and AI development.

Copper is sitting in a different phase of the cycle.

The sector is still tied to long development timelines, exploration risk, and project-level uncertainty. Early-stage names like NovaRed Mining (CSE: NRED / OTCQB: NREDF) have already seen strong moves from earlier lows, but they still trade based on exploration outcomes rather than production or cash flow.

The comparison that keeps coming up is how both sectors are being framed under the same policy direction.

Quantum computing and advanced compute infrastructure are being treated as strategic technology assets.

Copper and other critical minerals are being treated as physical inputs for the same systems:

* AI data centers

* electrical grids

* defense manufacturing

* electrification buildouts

The capital flows are not synchronized across those layers. Compute infrastructure is getting direct funding and faster repricing. Mining and exploration depend on drilling cycles, permitting, and longer development paths.

NovaRed’s position sits inside that gap between narrative and execution. The company is linked to copper exploration in British Columbia while also pushing an AI-focused mining platform through its MetalCore initiative.

The sector question is whether capital rotation into “strategic inputs” stays concentrated in compute, or gradually expands into upstream resources that feed it.

u/_rhizomorphic_ — 14 hours ago
▲ 29 r/TheRaceTo10Million+3 crossposts

$CXAI - Why This $0.18 Enterprise AI Stock Deserves Your Attention

EDIT: @HelloBeautifulz just linked their Android dev page & Apple App store page. Looks like there's some big names who've contracted their system. Warner Bros, EA, Adobe and more! https://play.google.com/store/apps/developer?id=CXApp&hl=en_US
https://apps.apple.com/us/developer/cxapp-us-inc/id692960350

CXAI: Gartner-recognised enterprise AI platform trading at cash value. The dilution that killed the stock may already be over.

Been digging into CXApp (NASDAQ: CXAI) for a while and I think this is genuinely one of the more interesting setups in the micro-cap space right now. Here's the quick version.

What they do

CXApp builds AI-powered workplace management software for Fortune 500 companies (think intelligent desk booking, campus navigation, meeting room automation, and agentic AI that autonomously handles multi-step workplace workflows). Used by major enterprises across tech, finance, healthcare, and manufacturing in 100+ countries.

Why it's at $0.17

Not because the business is failing. Because of a specific financing arrangement called a pre-paid purchase facility with a company called Avondale Capital. Avondale paid CXApp cash upfront in 2025 (at stock prices between $0.40 and $1.06), and CXApp has been delivering shares (scaled to dollar value at time of delivery) as repayment ever since. Those deliveries flooded the market with new supply and crushed the stock. CXApp probably didn't intend such heavy dilution, the prepaid agreements were signed when the price of the stock was much higher.

Here's the thing, the last Avondale share delivery was filed with the SEC on April 17. Today is May 21. That's 34 consecutive days with no new filing. Prior deliveries happened every 1-2 weeks without exception across 15 delivery dates in 4 months. The 5-week silence suggests those prior contractual obligations may already be fulfilled.

The business quality is real

  • Gartner Magic Quadrant Visionary - named in April 2026. Gartner independently validates this, it's not a paid recognition. Puts CXApp on global enterprise procurement shortlists automatically.
  • Google Cloud featured them as a case study at Google Cloud Next 2026. Google's Director of Product endorsed their architecture.
  • Fortune 500 customers renewing at 130%+ ARR expansion - customers paying significantly more on renewal isn't an accident.
  • 87% gross margins - higher than Salesforce (74%) and ServiceNow (78%).
  • 41 institutional holders including Vanguard and Renaissance Technologies. Vanguard increased its position by 93.4% last quarter.
  • CEO holds 6.65 million ordinary shares with zero anti-dilution protection. His personal wealth moves in lockstep with yours.

The valuation math

At $0.18 per share with ~70M shares, market cap is ~$12M. They have $12.3M in verified cash (confirmed in SEC 10-Q filed May 13, 2026). The market is literally pricing the entire operating business at zero.

A double to $0.34 only requires the market to assign 2-3x price-to-sales: the minimum floor any SaaS business should trade at. At 2027 projected revenue of $11M and a conservative 6x multiple the stock would be approximately $0.94 per share. At 8x it's $1.26. Analyst consensus projects 57% annual revenue growth.

The revenue decline (it's not what it looks like)

Revenue fell 36% in 2025 but gross margins simultaneously expanded from 82% to 87%. That only happens if you deliberately shed lower-margin revenue. The company exited low-quality professional services contracts to build a pure subscription base. Subscription revenue is now 98% of total. The revenue base is smaller but significantly higher quality.

Q1 2026 bookings exceeded recognised revenue, a leading indicator that Q2 will inflect upward. Three new enterprise wins with $5M total contract value are converting now. CXAI 2.0 platform launches June 2026.

The self-reinforcing recovery

Here's the elegant part: because Avondale shares are delivered at prevailing market prices, the dilution threat dissolves automatically as the stock rises. Drawing $1M at $0.17 costs 6M new shares. At $1.00 it costs only 1M. At $3.00 just 350K. The same recovery that generates returns simultaneously destroys the primary risk.

The risks - because you should know them

The $38.95M remaining Avondale facility could be drawn again, that's the primary risk. A reverse split is likely needed for Nasdaq compliance, which typically causes an initial price drop. The revenue recovery is signalled but not yet proven in reported numbers. And Microsoft and ServiceNow are larger, better-resourced competitors.

This isn't a recommendation, do your own research and talk to a financial advisor before investing. But if you're looking for a genuinely interesting asymmetric setup with a real business behind it, CXAI deserves a close look right now.

Not financial advice. DYOR.

reddit.com
u/CrayonsForBilly — 21 hours ago
▲ 2 r/TheRaceTo10Million

Webull stock to $10 ?

I bought Webull at $9.2, but does not seem like it moving up. Am I screwed? Or, does it have potential to reach above 10 in coming years? Whats your price target?

reddit.com
u/innovative_guy — 17 hours ago
▲ 98 r/TheRaceTo10Million

Which stock will Reddit pretend it “always knew” about in 2 years?

This happens every cycle.

A stock runs 300-1000%.
Then suddenly everyone claims they saw it coming.
But when it was actually early, half the comments were calling it trash.

PLTR had that.
RKLB had that.
ASTS had that.
NVDA had that for years.
AMD had it multiple times.

So what is the next one?

What stock today has:

  • A big enough market
  • Real catalysts
  • A hated or ignored phase
  • Enough risk to keep people away
  • Enough upside to matter

I keep seeing people mention OKLO, PATH, AUR, SOUN, LUNR, OPEN, NOK, LWLG, LAES, NRED.

Which one do you think Reddit is sleeping on?

u/AaronWebster34 — 1 day ago
▲ 12 r/TheRaceTo10Million

$HMR: Uber of Ships. 373% growth, zero debt - Cash nearly majority of mcap! CEO buying hard, Hormuz tailwind. Most undervalued on NASDAQ. No red flags - prove me wrong.

I’ve been doing deep research on $HMR (Heidmar Maritime Holdings) and the more I dig, the more I can’t find a red flag that hasn’t already been addressed. So I’m posting this publicly. If you find one I haven’t covered - drop it below. I want to be challenged.

-

🏆 THE VALUATION ANOMALY
Let’s start with the basics. The market cap is below annual revenue. You’re paying less than $1 for every $1 of revenue this company generates. That alone is one of the rarest setups you’ll find on a public exchange.

Competitors trade at 15-20x PE multiples. $HMR trades at 4x forward PE. The market is pricing it like a dying business. It just posted 373% year-over-year revenue growth. That math doesn’t add up - and that gap is the opportunity.
Analyst price targets sit 3-6x above current price with a Strong Buy consensus. 

The cash pile is approaching a majority of total market cap - back out the cash and you’re paying almost nothing for the operating business. Zero debt. No leverage risk. Strip out the debt adjustments competitors carry and HMR’s enterprise value gets even cheaper.

-

🔥 THE GROWTH ENGINE

• 373% YoY Revenue Growth - from a real, auditable ~$55M TTM base. Not a projection. Already happened.
• 76% YoY Revenue Growth forecast for 2026 - compounding on top of a massive base, not decelerating
• 55%+ Gross Margins - a high-margin services business hiding inside a shipping ticker the market is pricing like a commodity boat operator
• $13.2M operating cash flow - the net loss headline is noise. It’s driven by one-off IPO costs and non-cash stock comp. The underlying business is profitable.
• Self-funding operations - no dependency on capital markets to survive
• Zero dilutive equity raises since listing - every share you buy today represents the same fraction of the company as day one

-

💎 THE BUSINESS MODEL - THE UBER OF SHIPPING
Here’s what most people miss. HMR owns zero ships. Think Uber without owning a single car.

It’s an asset-light platform that earns fees on gross voyage revenue - not on profits. It gets paid whether tanker rates are $50k/day or $500k/day. Fee math on record: 1.75% of a $20M VLCC voyage over 45-50 days = ~$350,000+ commission per voyage. CEO confirmed this publicly.
Comparing $HMR to IMPP, STNG or FRO using Price-to-Book or NAV metrics is like valuing Uber by how many cars it owns. Wrong comp set entirely. The correct comparison is fee-based platform businesses - and on those metrics, this is deeply mispriced.

It scales ships at near-zero marginal cost. No capex. No newbuild risk. No steel on the balance sheet. Asset-heavy competitors are hard-capped by NAV - in a downturn their stock collapses with ship values. HMR has no NAV floor dragging it down and no ceiling capping it. It re-rates purely on earnings growth, exactly like a software company would.
The moat is powered by eFleetWatch - a proprietary tech platform built over 20 years with real-time voyage data, tracking and performance analytics. Not something a competitor can spin up in 12 months.

-

🚨 THE INSIDER SIGNAL
CEO Pankaj Khanna owns 45% of the company personally and has been buying shares above market price for three consecutive months. Zero sales.
His own words: “The only thing I’m worried about is if I keep buying, there will be no float left.”
Combined with strategic ownership, 90%+ of shares are locked up by insiders - one of the tightest floats on all of NASDAQ.

-

💣 THE FLOAT SQUEEZE SETUP
Float is under 6 million shares. With 90%+ locked by insiders who aren’t lending, the stock is nearly un-borrowable - short sellers structurally cannot build a meaningful position. Remove the primary downward pressure mechanism and what’s left? Any meaningful institutional or retail demand moves this thing fast.
Awareness in public markets is near zero. It’s a household name in maritime. Invisible everywhere else. You’re buying before the arbitrage closes.

-

🌊 THE MACRO TAILWIND - WHY RIGHT NOW
This is where it gets spicy. $HMR is positively asymmetric to volatility. CEO’s words: “When rates rise, we earn more. When disruption hits… we earn even more.”

• Strait of Hormuz escalation directly expands HMR’s fee base - unlike vessel owners who face insurance blowback and operational exposure
• A VLCC was already fixed at nearly $500,000/day - the rate environment is here, not forecast
• CEO on record: “Beginning, not the end” of the tanker cycle - with 18-24 months of upside legs stated explicitly
• 9–12 month restocking window creates a 10-20% jump in tanker demand - a specific, quantified catalyst still in play
• 40 vessels under commercial management + 10 under technical management + 30 newbuildings incoming - fleet scale expanding into the strongest freight market in decades, with zero balance sheet cost to Heidmar

-

🏛 40 YEARS OF INSTITUTIONAL CREDIBILITY
This is not a SPAC. Not a shell. Not a reverse merger play.
Heidmar has a 40-year operating history with clients including Shell, BP, Chevron, Vitol, Saudi Aramco, Trafigura, and Glencore. The largest energy traders on earth trust them with cargo. That’s validation no marketing campaign can buy and no competitor can fast-track through KYC.
Six global hubs: Athens, London, Dubai, Singapore, Hong Kong, Chennai.

-

The checklist:

• ✅ Market cap below revenue
• ✅ 4x forward PE vs 15-20x peers
• ✅ 373% YoY growth already booked
• ✅ 55%+ gross margins
• ✅ Zero debt, $19M Cash nearly majority of mcap!!
• ✅ $13.2M operating cash flow
• ✅ CEO buying above market price for 3 months straight
• ✅ Float under 6M shares, near un-borrowable
• ✅ 40-year track record, Shell/BP/Aramco clients
• ✅ Asset-light model - the Uber of tanker shipping
• ✅ Geopolitical volatility increases revenue
• ✅ No dilution since listing

So - what’s the red flag I’m missing? Drop it below. I want to stress test this.

Not financial advice. Do your own due diligence. Check Their YouTube

reddit.com
u/-Authorised- — 1 day ago