u/Less_Bridge_4647

[QC] DateJust 41 126333 - Andiot

[QC] DateJust 41 126333 - Andiot

  1. Dealer name: Andiot
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): DateJust 41 126333 904L SS VSF Best Edition YG Dial on Jubilee Bracelet VS3235
  4. Price paid: $448
  5. Index alignment: Looks good to me overall. I don’t see any obvious crooked markers, but I’d appreciate a second opinion especially since i feel like my QC pic wasn't super square so lines dont match great
  6. Dial printing: Looks clean and centered to my eyes. Rolex / Oyster Perpetual / DATEJUST printing looks good.
  7. Date wheel alignment/printing: Looks centered through the cyclops and the font looks fine to me.
  8. Hand alignment: Looks good from the pictures and videos.
  9. Bezel: Looks good
  10. Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight and clean to me. I don’t see any major gaps.
  11. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, 271° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error. These numbers look good to me best on my newb knowledge.
  12. Anything else you notice: I would appreciate some other eyes as first rep purchase & QC. links to all my photos and videos here: https://imgur.com/a/2lBqYTX

My current verdict: GL

Thanks in advance for the help!

u/Less_Bridge_4647 — 6 days ago

[QC] Daytona 126500 VSF - Andiot

  1. Dealer name: Andiot
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126500 VSF 1:1 Best Edition 904L Steel White Dial on SS Bracelet DD4131
  4. Price paid: $658
  5. Index alignment: I don’t see any obvious crooked markers, but I’d appreciate a second opinion especially since i feel like my QC pic wasn't super square and not sure if thats causing some miss alignment with the tool
  6. Dial printing: Looks clean and centered to my eyes. All printing looks good and clean but know this is area where quality can vary from factory.
  7. Date wheel alignment/printing: Looks centered & the font looks fine to me.
  8. Hand alignment: Looks good from the pictures and videos.
  9. Bezel: Looks good but I know these bezels quality can vary and big sign of Gen vs. Rep - spacing looks good
  10. Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight and clean to me. I don’t see any major gaps.
  11. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, 271° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error. These numbers look good to me best on my newb knowledge but I did notice they jump a bit quickly in the video i put in the imgur gallery
  12. Anything else you notice: I would appreciate some other eyes as first rep purchase & QC. links to all my photos and videos here: https://imgur.com/a/9AuDpz4

My current verdict: GL

Thanks in advance for the help!

u/Less_Bridge_4647 — 6 days ago