CIT Cares More About Placement Numbers Than Student Careers
At CIT, one of my skilled friend recently got placed in a company offering 4 LPA with a 3-year bond.
Now he's stuck with two choices:
reject the offer and get out of placements completely
(or)
accept it and hope the college may allow him to attend other drives later (Not guaranteed).
What feels unfair is that students who underperform in placements are still allowed to attend more drives and get additional opportunities. Meanwhile, students who manage to get placed, even in low-package companies with long bonds, can end up losing their chances at better opportunities.
Shouldn't placement policies encourage students to grow and compete for better roles instead of creating uncertainty and penalizing those who get placed early?
CIT CDC trapping students with fake promises. You guys should take an immediate action on this.......