Did Melissa Nathan (who orchestrates smear and harassment campaigns against women on behalf of problematic men and Rebel Wilson) plant a story in the DM in an attempt to silence commentary on her actions as exposed in court documents?
Nothing to see here, just Alison Boshoff of the Daily Mail (you know, that Boshoff who was exposed as a Melissa Nathan proxy in communications produced in discovery in the Lively/Baldoni action) back to her old tricks.
Clearly upset about the commentary produced by commentators who examined (and quoted directly from) the public record in the Lively/Baldoni action, Nathan turned to her ally, Boshoff for a hit piece. The narrative that Nathan planted and wants amplified? That commentary by pro-Lively commentators on the Lively/Baldoni action leads to harassment of her. Of her. The same Melissa Nathan who boasted that she can “bury anyone” and who has orchestrated harassment and smear campaigns against Amber Heard, Blake Lively, Stephanie Jones, Amanda Ghost, Alexa Nikolas, the victims of the Alexander Brothers (two of whom, the DA confirmed, were so intimidated that they did not give evidence at trial and another of whom was found dead shortly before trial).
That Melissa Nathan wants you to know that calling out her behavior leads to spikes in online harassment of her. Well, she wants you to know. But she doesn’t want you to know that she wants you to know. The original version of the Boshoff authored hit piece included a direct quote from Nathan claiming harassment. Hours later, an updated version was published which removed the reference to Nathan and re-attributed the “harassment” quote to “those involved in the case”. Thankfully, the Wayback machine preserved this about turn.
Current version: https://www.dailymail.com/tvshowbiz/article-16051417/amp/ALISON-BOSHOFF-Ryan-Reynolds-stokes-Justin-Baldoni-feud.html
I have questions. Is Boshoff getting sloppy? Did Nathan get camera shy all of a sudden? Is this hit piece an attempt to silence legitimate criticism of Melissa Nathan’s practice of abusing women on behalf of her abusive clients?
Is the timing of this hit piece (which was posted shortly after the court in the Alexa Nikolas case denied Freedman’s attempt to get Nikolas’ claims (alleging that Freedman, Nathan and Wallace orchestrated a smear campaign against her) thrown out of court and ruled that Nikolas has established a probability of prevailing at trial) merely coincidental? https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/alexa-nikolas-defamation-case-bryan-freedman-1236673163/