r/CelebLegalDrama

The brilliance of Baldoni's defamation lawsuit. Worth every single penny of 47.1 fees.

Justin Baldoni filed his defamation suit for one purpose: as a vehicle to release his traunch of evidence, lawsuitinfo.com, and his own narrative.

Everyone believed Lively when she filed her CRD complaint and the NYT published its exposé. Everyone believed her when she filed her lawsuit. The public and many celebrities rushed to her defense while condemning Baldoni.

He had to act quickly. That's why his defamation pleading was rushed, poorly-constructed, and ultimately dismissed. That's also why his team never amended the claims or sought appeal. The suit had already served its purpose.

It immediately reversed public sentiment by handing the public 150+ pages of texts, emails, and a dance scene video, and completely changed the entire litigation landscape.

The goal was to do this as quickly as possible before people's support of Lively was irreversible. And that's exactly what happened. If he had waited for discovery to conclude (the next opportunity for the public to see his evidence and counter narrative), there was a risk people's opinions would have been solidified.

The suit accomplished everything it was drafted to accomplish, save for avoiding 47.1 fees. It changed public discourse, reversed public sentiment, rallied people around Baldoni, exposed the many falsehoods in Lively's lawsuit (forcing her to amend her complaint twice!), exposed Lively as a false accuser, and put her on her heels for the rest of the litigation until she settled without receiving a penny of her $300M in damages.

The defamation suit was worth every penny of whatever Liman will award Lively, which won't be $8M.

reddit.com
u/Marleen_Emrick — 5 hours ago

Fraud is Illegal!

Submitting falsified and erroneous invoices to. FEDERAL COURT shows insane hubris, and for Liman not to be offended and even entertaining awarding $1 is making his career and courtroom look like an entire sham! HOW is he just NOT OVER THIS WHOLE THING BY NOW? I understand that he’s not the kind of guy who’s going to go down the road of holding them legally accountable for gross misrepresentation, but the entire time that he was giving Lively and her attorneys all of the slack and concessions that he DID, there’s no appeal opportunity, and in light of the whole Taylor swift snub on Friday, he need not concern himself with the business circles that his brother and the Ari Emmanuel’s of the world once shared with Lively and Reynolds any longer, as the latter are now completely irrelevant. The industry has clearly spoken, Lively and Reynolds are no longer contenders. Ergo, Liman needs to deny ANY attorneys fees and show the public that he’s not a joke and have Blake brought to justice regarding this attempt to defraud and con. Gottlieb’s career has GOT to be destroyed, if not so, he definitely has zero credibility at this juncture, this is his last high-profile case, no doubt. My opinion is that in the wake of the #metoo movement, Ezra and Michael thought they had a ‘sure thing’, and were counting their paychecks in advance, and were not aware that Lively lied and completely fabricated all of the allegations, and by the time they realized such, they had made a monster and they couldn’t extricate themselves out of the situation. Similar to how Blake lied to TS about being sexually harrassed by Baldoni.

reddit.com
u/Lyn-not-line1974 — 12 hours ago

Unpopular opinion re Taylor and Travis’ wedding

I’m sure the ‘swifties’ will come after me for this one. Does anyone find it contradictory that two people who have gone to extraordinary lengths to keep their nuptials private (eg NDAs, no phone policy, big white tents, blacked out cars, threats made to fire people who don’t adhere to their privacy rules) chose to have their wedding in the most public place in New York, shut down streets, enlist hundreds of police officers, impact many small businesses. It doesn’t make any sense. They donated $26 million to charity but are set to make more than 100 times more than that when they release official photos and video of the event. Guaranteed they will be selling these these to the media outlets that pay the highest price. Negotiations between the media and her publicist would have already begun.
By now Travis and Taylor are probably on some exclusive private island letting their media team take care of things.

reddit.com
u/RubyRedShoes77 — 1 day ago

Reaction To Taylor Swift Not Inviting Blake Lively To Her Wedding

I guess people do care. Despite insisting that they don't care. And this is all a "nothing burger."

u/firstwepour-roses — 2 days ago
▲ 0 r/CelebLegalDrama+1 crossposts

WSS SUPPORT🐳🩹 (there is so much actual evidence abt how he is innocent but yall just belive the liar who has money)

so please people who support the orange hi-lighter please do try and argue with me

Post-Taylor wedding, I am more pro-Blake than ever (and I'm a former Baldoni supporter)

Just caught up on some of the coverage of Swift's wedding, as well as some of the unrelenting hatred and mockery of Lively for not being there (barring some shocking revelation that she was and it just hadn't been reported). I supported Baldoni for a while last year, then switched sides this year after seeing a bunch of the depositions/texts/learning about Melissa Nathan's and Jed Wallace's other clients. And I felt like I had a bit of a wake-up call in feeling like "JFC this hatred towards Blake is INSANE. It's so over the top. The Reddit hate pages are psychotic. What is happening?"

Most of all, Swift ditching Lively during the worst time in Blake's life feels incredibly petty and shallow to me. And it's bizarre if Baldoni supporters give Taylor a pass if they're going to be so harsh on Blake. If you believe the text messages from the lawsuit exposed Taylor as a mean girl and a liar, but you're celebrating her not inviting Blake to the wedding...why are you giving Taylor a pass for deserting her friend?

reddit.com
u/Critical-Drawing395 — 2 days ago

PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT SHELBY LISTEN UP! (i am a wss supporter🐳🩹)

okay so first off, you guys are insanely wrong about him being an abuser because 1. he has said that he might have not done good things he had never abused someone 2. shelby has already lied many times abt abuse and bad partners 3. how would you even belive that wilvur would just come out and do this out of nowhere because he had never done anything like this and never will so please fact check before you say things like this because it is wrong

Where did everyone go??

At its peak this sub had almost 100k visitors a week

Then it went downhill

A few weeks ago 40k weekly visitors

Now the sub is at 9k

And continues to drop

Where did everyone go??

u/firstwepour-roses — 3 days ago

Negativity and Bad Nature of Mario Lopez

Mario Lopez has enjoyed a long and successful career in the entertainment industry, but like many public figures, he has also been the subject of criticism and controversy. Over the years, several aspects of his personal life, public statements, and professional career have drawn negative attention.

In 1993, Lopez was accused of sexual assault by a woman. However, the case did not result in criminal charges because there was insufficient evidence to proceed, and Lopez has consistently denied the allegation. In 2019, he faced widespread criticism after stating that he believed it was "dangerous" for very young children to decide their gender identity. His remarks were condemned by many LGBTQ+ advocates, medical professionals, and fellow celebrities. Following the backlash, Lopez publicly apologized, describing his comments as "ignorant and insensitive" and saying that listening to others had given him a better understanding of the issue.

Mario Lopez's social media tributes have become repetitive, particularly when he posts memorial messages for celebrities he never personally knew such as Paul Walker, James Caan, Chuck Norris, Kobe Bryant, Matthew Perry, Carl Weathers, Suzanne Somers, Olivia Newton-John, Richard Simmons, Shannen Doherty, Val Kilmer, Gene Hackman, Tina Turner, Tony Bennett, Betty White, Sidney Poitier, Burt Reynolds, Robin Williams. The frequent nature of these posts can come across as formulaic rather than heartfelt, leading some followers to question whether they are intended more to boost engagement or maintain his public profile than to express genuine remembrance. He also always use some facts about the deceased to pay tributes to them to gain attention like for example he pointed out that he named his son Sonny after Sonny Corleone when posting online tribute to James Caan. This shows that he is one of those stars who pay tributes to gain sympathies, public attention and more gain of popularity which is selfishness and vanity.

Lopez has become overexposed due to his many years hosting entertainment news and reality television programs, making him closely associated with celebrity gossip television. Although he has found considerable success as a television host, his acting career has received a more mixed reception, with several of his films and television movies earning mixed or negative reviews from critics.

Additionally, Lopez's public comments on political and social issues have occasionally generated backlash from those who disagreed with his views. His personal life has also attracted significant tabloid attention over the years. One of the most widely publicized incidents involved his marriage to Ali Landry, which was annulled shortly after their wedding following reports of his infidelity, an event that received extensive media coverage.

Mario Lopez is by far one of those self-righteous, selfish, vain and attention gaining star who not only does all of this to gain attention and likes from the people, but also he thinks himself above all like superiority and points out facts out the deceased person just gain close to those people and their family, their lives and legacy all for personal gains and fortunes.

reddit.com
u/Complex_Sea6192 — 2 days ago
▲ 56 r/CelebLegalDrama+2 crossposts

Ghost v. Wilson update - Ghost request for international judicial assistance to subpoena UK and Australian witnesses

Now that full discovery is proceeding in Amanda Ghost's defamation lawsuit against Rebel Wilson, Melissa Nathan, and TAG (after Wilson/Nathan/TAG withdrew their latest anti-SLAPP motion), Ghost has filed a motion to issue letters rogatory -- i.e., requests to foreign governments for service of process -- that will allow her to serve UK and Australian witnesses whose testimony and documents are needed to support her case.

The motion is necessary because these witnesses are beyond the reach of domestic U.S. subpoena power, so they need to be served via the Hague Convention, which created a mechanism for international cooperation for that purpose.

The specific witnesses whom Ghost hopes to serve are:

  • Greer Simpkin, a local Australian producer on The Deb
  • David Jowsey, another local producer
  • Matt Reeder, a co-producer
  • Tiare Tomaszewski, another producer
  • Noni Roy, an assistant director
  • Sue Bownds, Rebel Wilson's mother and a director of Camp Sugar, her company
  • Lynne O'Brien, head of makeup on The Deb
  • Pia Ashcroft, a senior film employee
  • Charles Collier and Angharad Wood, Wilson's former UK-based agents

Most of these names will be familiar to people who followed the Charlotte MacInnes v. Rebel Wilson defamation trial in Australia a couple months ago, as most of them testified in that trial. (MacInnes is the actress whom Wilson claimed had complained about inappropriate behavior by Ghost; she sued Wilson over that claim, with a ruling still pending.) You can find most of their affidavits here: https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/services/access-to-files-and-transcripts/online-files/macinnes-v-wilson

Notably, these witnesses' testimony/documents will mainly be relevant to Ghost's original defamation complaint, which revolves around Wilson's claims in an Instagram video and a publicly-circulated demand letter from Bryan Freedman that Ghost and her fellow producers behaved inappropriately toward MacInnes and embezzled funds from the film.

Presumably discovery is also proceeding on Ghost's September 2025 cross-complaint, which focuses on "smear websites" that accused her of sex trafficking. This discovery will involve testimony/documents from Nathan, Freedman, Jed Wallace, and various current or former TAG employees, but they are all U.S.-based so letters rogatory won't be necessary for them. We won't find out how discovery is going on that front unless and until motions related to that discovery are filed on the docket.

The motion for international judicial assistance is set to be heard on July 28. Trial in Ghost v. Wilson is currently scheduled for October.

u/Fuzzy-Psychology-656 — 3 days ago
▲ 145 r/CelebLegalDrama+1 crossposts

Strong ad about what sexual abuse victims have to deal with. #weridetogether

Such an accurate ad. Which shows all the problems of the system and what victims have to deal with.

u/Heavy-Ad5346 — 4 days ago
▲ 2 r/CelebLegalDrama+1 crossposts

Blake Lively asks for $8 Million in legal fees from Baldoni for frivolous lawsuit filed against her

Harvey Weinstein rushed to hospital. NY businesses complaining about MSG shut down during busy World Cup Weekend. A couple climbed the Empire State Building and got arrested for it.

youtube.com
u/Many-Scene-4268 — 4 days ago

DIICOT Adds New Charges Against Andrew and Tristan Tate

Andrew and Tristan Tate were questioned for two hours on Friday. After, Romania’s Directorate for Investigating Organized Crime and Terrorism (DIICOT) announced it is merging the two criminal cases against them and adding more charges.

In addition to the existing charges of human trafficking and rape, investigators have now added money laundering, witness tampering, removal of seized assets, and complicity in the trafficking of a minor.

romaniajournal.ro
u/Expatriarch — 2 days ago
▲ 11 r/CelebLegalDrama+1 crossposts

Karma comes back at you fast! Just make sure you have that 8 million ready justin and co-conspirators

u/frillociraptor — 5 days ago