u/More_Midnight3634

**Can Pro-Lively Content Creators Sue the Daily Mail?**Apparently they can.

Which is exciting news for the pro-Lively content creators, because as far as I know none of them have said they want to.

But don’t worry. Someone has volunteered them for litigation.

“I hope you can both sue.”

Sue??

Did they say they were suing?

No.

Did they threaten the Daily Mail?

No.

Did they start a GoFundMe?

No.

Did they ask this person to assemble the Avengers of Defamation on their behalf?

Also no.

What actually happened is considerably less cinematic.

The Daily Mail published an article naming content creators their source was Melissa Nathan, PR for Epstein, The Alexander brothers, and Justin Baldoni*. Her name was subsequently removed.

The creators themselves weren’t contacted for comment before being put into the story.

So yes, they might reasonably have questions about why their names were included in a PR-sourced celebrity article without anyone bothering to call them. They might strongly feel that this was just a shady attempt to get their names out to the public by a known bad actor.

That’s rather different from:
WE RIDE AT DAWN. COUNSEL HAS BEEN RETAINED.

You’re welcome for the clarification!

*yes the moron representing rapists thinks that content creators discussing workplace issues are the reasons she being harassed. And not that she represented the Alexander Brothers!

Crosspost Disclaimer: This sort of crosspost is about the argument and subject matter, not the OP, the commenters, the subreddit, their ancestors, their pets, or their life choices.
Discuss the argument here. Please do not visit the original post to comment, vote, report, poke, prod, investigate, evangelize, or otherwise announce your presence.
We are discussing an idea, not launching a field trip.

https://msmagazine.com/2026/07/22/blake-lively-sexual-harassment-justin-baldoni/

Terrible news from D23: Ryan Reynolds has apparently appeared in another Marvel promotional bit, which can only mean one thing.

# Kevin Feige is being held hostage.

*(Allegedly)*

There is simply no other explanation for Disney repeatedly putting the star of *Deadpool & Wolverine* in Marvel promotions. Certainly not the $1.3 billion box office. Certainly not that Marvel seems to enjoy working with him. Certainly not that Kevin Feige is literally the guy running Marvel Studios.

No. Ryan must have **powerful insiders pulling at Feige’s ear.**

At this point, I desperately want to know who these mysterious insiders are.
Bob Iger?
Alan Bergman?
The Marvel executives?
Disney’s marketing department?
Kevin Feige himself wearing a fake mustache?
Three children in a trench coat?

Because we are now several conspiracy layers deep into explaining why Marvel keeps voluntarily promoting one of the biggest stars, of one of its biggest movies.

And apparently Disney “didn’t learn their lesson” from Ryan’s behavior during and after *Deadpool & Wolverine.*
Which lesson?
The part where the movie made an obscene amount of money?
The part where Disney kept working with him?
The part where Feige keeps participating in these “hokey bits”?

At some point, when the studio, its executives, its marketing department and Kevin Feige himself all continue behaving as though Ryan Reynolds is welcome at Marvel, perhaps the sinister explanation is simply:
**They like him. And their stock holders really like him.**

But I respect the commitment to the alternative theory that Kevin Feige secretly hates this and is powerless against Ryan Reynolds’ vast network of super villains. It actually plays right into a Deadpool 4th wall break.

Next week: **“Ryan Reynolds Seen Inside Marvel Offices. Has Feige Lost Control of the Building?”**

***Crosspost Disclaimer:***

*This crosspost is about the* ***argument and subject matter****, not the OP, the commenters, the subreddit, their ancestors, their pets, or their life choices. (Well may their life choices to make said argument.)*

*Discuss the argument* ***here****. Please do not visit the original post to comment, vote, report, poke, prod, investigate, evangelize, or otherwise announce your presence.*

*We are discussing an idea, not launching a field trip.*

*When they go low, we go satirical!*

*Allegedly ;)*

Doing my usual reddit scroll and I stumble upon yet another Doomsday promo at yet another fan event - this time D23 2026. Disney clearly didn't learn their lesson or care about Reynold's behaviour during or post DP&W because they wouldn't keep doing these hokey 'bits' with Ryan every few weeks otherwise.

I doubt Ryan has dirt on Feige, but I reckon he's friendly enough with powerful insiders who can keep pulling at Feige's ear. I was on the fence about watching Doomsday, now I'm not, just like the Odyssey I won't be supporting people with moral compasses weaker than a sick kitten.

It's what he deserves

Debtpool was already forced to change his Instagram profile in which he falsely claimed he “owns” Aviation Gin and Mint Mobile. Seems like his editing skills didn’t make it over to his Gotham Artists profile.

True to form Ryan Reynolds is a phony fraudster. He doesn’t own Aviation Gin. A highly regarded international company with over 200 brands does: https://www.diageo.com/en/our-brands

He also doesn’t own Mint Mobile. T-Mobile does. Debtpool once had a stake in the company (not even close to ownership) and remains only in a “creative marketing” role.

The lengths of his shill knows no bounds. Stop lying Debtpool. Stop pretending to own things you provably don’t. Particularly when there are mounds of evidence that what you don’t own, you try your darnedest to steal.

Link to the patently false speaker profile: https://gothamartists.com/ryan-reynolds/

There is a claim that keeps getting repeated online that Justin Baldoni never apologized to Blake Lively.

That is simply not accurate.

In January 2025, a nearly seven minute voice memo from Justin Baldoni to Blake Lively became public. In the recording, Baldoni apologizes to Lively after their disagreement over her rewrite of the rooftop scene in It Ends With Us.

This is not someone interpreting a text message. It is not a lawyer characterizing what happened. It is not Blake Lively describing the conversation.
It is Justin Baldoni, in his own voice, apologizing directly to Blake Lively.
Among other things, Baldoni tells her that he is sorry, acknowledges that he responded poorly, says he failed, and admits that his reaction made her feel badly.

You can listen to the recording here:

Justin Baldoni’s 2 A.M. Voice Message to Blake Lively: “I’m Really Sorry”
https://www.tmz.com/2025/01/27/justin-baldoni-voice-message-apology-blake-lively/

To be precise, this does not mean Baldoni was apologizing for every allegation Blake Lively later made against him. The voice memo concerned their dispute over the rooftop scene and his response to her concerns.

But that is very different from saying Justin Baldoni never apologized to Blake Lively.
He did.
There is an audio recording of it.

So the next time you see someone asking, “Did Justin Baldoni ever apologize to Blake Lively?” or claiming “Justin Baldoni never apologized,” the answer is readily available in Justin Baldoni’s own voice.

Yes. Justin Baldoni apologized to Blake Lively. The audio is public.

MegaJoke is a *public* legal content creator.

MegaJoke posts their AI content to a poorly made website.

Ryan Reynolds seems to really like MegaJoke, and I think we might see a future collaboration.

Please be respectful in the comment section.

The focus should be on MegaJokes legal arguments.

They recently claimed on their AI website that the NYT dismissal was based on evidence/discovery.

Let's unpack.

And please use the handle that MegaJoke uses on their *public* platforms when discussing MegaJoke.

*MegaJoke1+1=4*

Or to save time

*MegaJoke*

Caught one talking to themselves, their excuses were pretty wild.

1. She truly is a greedy and cheap person. Imagine being so cheap that she can only donate $5K to each charity, and those aren’t even her own money. Something doesn’t sit right with me about her taking all the credit and getting the tax write-off.
2. I have no evidence, but considering she is such an untrustworthy snake, she probably kept the rest of the profit.
3. Not her lying about her former foundation donating millions to charity when she was spending more money on trips than on charity.

JENNY SLATE: ACTING & VOICE-ACTING CREDITS
For anyone unfamiliar with just how long Jenny Slate has been working, here is a rundown of her film, television, animation, and voice-acting career. And in this career she has only raised an issue about working with one person JUSTIN Baldoni

LIVE-ACTION FILMS
• Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked (2011) — Zoe
• This Means War (2012) — Emily
• Bitch (2013) — Molly Horner
• Obvious Child (2014) — Donna Stern
• The Longest Week (2014) — Jocelyn
• Digging for Fire (2015) — Yoga Couple
• Joshy (2016) — Jodi
• My Blind Brother (2016) — Rose
• Brain on Fire (2016) — Margo
• Gifted (2017) — Bonnie Stevenson
• Aardvark (2017) — Emily Milburton
• Landline (2017) — Dana Jacobs
• The Polka King (2017) — Marla Lewan
• Hotel Artemis (2018) — Morgan
• Venom (2018) — Dr. Dora Skirth
• The Sunlit Night (2019) — Frances
• On the Rocks (2020) — Vanessa
• I Want You Back (2022) — Emma
• Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022) — Debbie the Dog Mom
• It Ends with Us (2024) — Allysa
• At the Sea (2026) — Debbie
• Carousel (2026) — Rebecca
ANIMATED & VOICE FILMS
• Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (2010) — Marcel
• Marcel the Shell with Shoes On, Two (2011) — Marcel
• The Lorax (2012) — Mrs. Wiggins
• Marcel the Shell with Shoes On, Three (2014) — Marcel
• Zootopia (2016) — Assistant Mayor Dawn Bellwether
• The Secret Life of Pets (2016) — Gidget
• Zoolander: Super Model (2016) — Nani
• The Lego Batman Movie (2017) — Harley Quinn
• Batman Is Just Not That Into You (2017) — Harley Quinn
• Despicable Me 3 (2017) — Valerie Da Vinci
• The Secret Life of Pets 2 (2019) — Gidget
• Super Gidget (2019) — Gidget
• Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (2021/2022) — Marcel
• The Bob’s Burgers Movie (2022) — Tammy Larsen
• The Electric State (2025) — Penny Pal
• Zootopia 2 (2025) — Dawn Bellwether
• Forgotten Island — Batibat
• The Ark and the Aardvark — Mitzi
LIVE-ACTION TELEVISION
• Starved (2005) — Member of Belt Tighteners
• The Whitest Kids U’ Know (2008) — Trevor’s Date
• Important Things with Demetri Martin (2009) — Bride
• Late Night with Jimmy Fallon (2009) — Jenny the Page
• Brothers (2009) — Annette
• Saturday Night Live (2009–2010) — Cast member/various characters
• Bored to Death (2009–2010) — Stella
• The Electric Company (2011) — Runner
• Raising Hope (2012) — Joan
• Girls (2012–2016) — Tally Schifrin
• Hello Ladies (2013) — Amelia Gordon
• Kroll Show (2013–2015) — Various characters
• Parks and Recreation (2013–2015) — Mona-Lisa Saperstein
• House of Lies (2013–2016) — Sarah Guggenheim
• Drunk History (2013–2016) — Herself/narrator
• Brooklyn Nine-Nine (2014) — Bianca
• Married (2014–2015) — Jess
• David: Story of David (2016) — Elizabeth
• Lady Dynamite (2016–2017) — Karen Grisham
• The Unauthorized Bash Brothers Experience (2019) — Stacy
• Jenny Slate: Stage Fright (2019) — Herself
• Jenny Slate: Seasoned Professional (2024) — Herself
• Dying for Sex (2025) — Nikki
TELEVISION VOICE ACTING
• Ugly Americans (2011) — Jaclyn
• Bob’s Burgers (2012–present) — Tammy Larsen
• Star vs. the Forces of Evil (2015–2019) — Pony Head
• Animals. (2016) — Snake
• Adventure Time (2016–2018) — Huntress Wizard
• Comrade Detective (2017) — Jane
• Big Mouth (2017–2025) — Missy Foreman-Greenwald and additional characters
• Clarence (2018) — Pipi, Cookie Mama Cashier, Beatrice
• Muppet Babies (2018–2022) — Miss Nanny
• The Simpsons (2019) — Piper Paisley
• Elena of Avalor (2020) — Cahu
• Q-Force (2021) — Voice role
• The Great North (2021–2025) — Judy Tobin
• Adventure Time: Fionna and Cake (2023) — Huntress Wizard
AUDIO / PODCAST ACTING
• Earth Break (2019) — Lynn Gellert
MUSIC VIDEOS / COMEDY PERFORMANCES
• The Lonely Island: “Threw It on the Ground” (2009) — Girlfriend
• The Lonely Island: “Oakland Nights” (2019) — Stacy
SOME OF HER MOST RECOGNIZABLE CHARACTERS
• Mona-Lisa Saperstein — Parks and Recreation
• Tammy Larsen — Bob’s Burgers
• Marcel — Marcel the Shell with Shoes On
• Dawn Bellwether — Zootopia
• Gidget — The Secret Life of Pets
• Harley Quinn — The Lego Batman Movie
• Valerie Da Vinci — Despicable Me 3
• Pony Head — Star vs. the Forces of Evil
• Huntress Wizard — Adventure Time
• Missy — Big Mouth
• Miss Nanny — Muppet Babies
• Judy Tobin — The Great North
• Donna Stern — Obvious Child
• Bonnie Stevenson — Gifted
• Dr. Dora Skirth — Venom
• Debbie the Dog Mom — Everything Everywhere All at Once
• Allysa — It Ends with Us
• Nikki — Dying for Sex
Jenny Slate was not some inexperienced supporting actress getting her first opportunity in Hollywood. She arrived on that production with an extensive filmography and roughly two decades of professional experience.

More fan sightings, all posted within the last week… Justin is out here living his best life while the haters stay busy spinning wild conspiracy theories and posting juvenile snark aimed at his wife, his beloved dad, and Baldoni supporters. The contrast couldn't be clearer.

Love your smile JB! ☺️

I honestly want to sue for this because Expatriarch is actively encouraging harassment against me and inventing batshit conspiracies to defame me. I'm genuinely considering contacting an attorney, so lmk if you have any suggestions or advice.

Expatriarch the Minister of Misogyny and Male Pattern Delusion has now created entire threads about me, accusing me of "SEO manipulation" and claiming I was "deployed" by Justin Baldoni's team to influence algorithms. He also suggested that I was secretly coordinating with Sam Baldoni regarding Blake and Justin.

As some of you know, I've recently been amplifying a completely unrelated case involving James Scott. I moderate Lauren's community, and when she sent me her video about James, she mentioned that Sam Baldoni had posted about it on Instagram. Since this case is completely unrelated to Justin or Wayfarer, I figured there was no harm in reaching out to Sam on LinkedIn to let him know that I was amplifying his post and Lauren's video. Sam thanked me for sharing and then a few days later, he pointed me to another video about James' case.

As evidenced by the screenshot, this was the first and ONLY time I had ever reached out to Sam. Btw, sorry to Sam for having to publish this screenshot. I never wanted to turn a private, completely normal exchange into content, and I was not trying to use him for clout, access, or proximity to Justin. But I cannot allow a false accusation against me to become a false accusation about him or Justin. I only shared this screenshot to make it clear I'm not working with Justin, being paid by anyone, or participating in some private coordinated effort. I genuinely thought the full conversation would put that accusation to rest, but Expatriarch and his Anti-Intelligence Unit could turn a grocery receipt into evidence of a covert operation. Big Milk has declined to comment on its role in the conspiracy.

Anyway, after Expat's first post was published to Reddit, the comment section immediately devolved into conspiracy theories about me. And this is where I fucked up. You guys know, I ALWAYS advise you all to stay away from pro-Blake subs that only exist to target and harass us. I usually don't like giving them any engagement or attention, but this time I couldn't resist. My immediate instinct was to dispel the rumors because I can literally prove that the only contact I've ever had with anyone related to Justin was extremely recent and about an entirely different case.

So I did the dumb thing and posted my conversation with Sam to prove that it was our first-ever exchange. Expat saw the screenshot, carried it to a different platform, stripped away the context, and presented it as evidence that I had somehow been secretly coordinating with Sam all along. Any plausible deniability that this was an innocent misunderstanding evaporated the second he was presented with evidence and still chose to publish the lie.

The most basic understanding of linear time completely destroys Expat's theory anyway, because my posts about Blake and Justin predated my first-ever contact with Sam. Therefore, a later conversation about James Scott cannot possibly prove that he directed content I had already created.

Holy shit, I didn't even realize I had a time machine as powerful as Jed's! Maybe we should team up to prevent Expat's parents from procreating!

Even setting aside the minor problem that his theory requires me to communicate backwards through time, his attempt to explain why I contacted Sam is somehow even more nonsensical and bizarre. Expat argues that I decided "at random" to contact Sam about James, but never contacted him while posting about Blake and Justin. Bro, why the fuck would I have contacted Sam about Blake and Justin? If I had really spent over a year "secretly working on Justin's behalf", the fact that I never once contacted Sam for information, approval, or coordination about anything involving Blake is actually glaring fucking evidence that no coordination existed in the first place.

Whenever I post about Blake and Justin, I'm commenting on a public lawsuit using information that is available to everyone. I had no reason to contact Sam about it because I'm not his fucking employee and I don't need to be fed insider information to post content on behalf of Justin.

Plus, Lauren is the one who told me about James Scott and mentioned that Sam posted about it. I thought he might appreciate knowing that his advocacy had reached our community. That wasn't aT rAnDoM; it was the first time I had an actual, normal reason to contact him because there was absolutely no fucking reason for me to insert myself into Sam's private life or bother him about his son's litigation. I'm not some fucking parasocial loser looking for clout, I just wanted to connect about a shared interest. Again, the fact that I have PROOF that I had never contacted Sam up until a few weeks ago should have buried Expat's conspiracy theory six feet underground. Instead, he dug up the corpse and had the audacity to spend several posts trying to convince everyone it still had a pulse.

Btw it's fucking ironic that Expat, of all people, is accusing me of being paid by Justin when he doesn't even have the balls to prove that HE hasn't been in contact with anyone related to the case while being followed by Ryan Reynolds, Stephanie Jones, Nick Viall, and Selma Hayek. He even appeared on the podcast hosted by Ryan's Bitch Boy, Nick Viall, ffs. By his own standard of "evidence", that should be enough for me to announce that he's part of a coordinated operation too.

I guess Expat's evidentiary standard only seems to apply when he's trying to smear me. A single, fully disclosed conversation about a completely unrelated case (WHICH IS WORTH FOLLOWING BTW) apparently proves that I was "deployed" by Justin's team. But sure, his OWN connections are presumably meaningless and above scrutiny.

And that brings me to the next smoking gun Expat thinks he uncovered: old comments where I used relevant search terms to combat Nick Shapiro's efforts; something Expat and his conspiracy caucus have breathlessly rebranded as sEo mAniPuLaTiOn.

YUP, I fucking did that and I'll stand ten toes down on it, idgaf. I obviously wasn't even hiding it, and it seemed to trigger the Blakeys, which is objectively hilarious.

I've disclosed MULTIPLE times that I work in marketing and PR. Understanding search behavior, discoverability, keyword titles, and how content surfaces online is quite literally part of my professional skill set. Using that knowledge to help people find content I personally believe is worth seeing isn't some nefarious act of covert manipulation. I wasn't even astroturfing or hiding what I was doing. I discussed it publicly and transparently.

BUT GOD FORBID A GIRL HAVE HOBBIES AND PUT HER SKILLS TO GOOD TROLLING USE, RIGHT? Expat found me, a marketing girlie discussing and deploying basic content strategy, and decided he had uncovered fucking Watergate. Someone alert the Pulitzer committee! The would-be hero of his own political thriller has discovered... KEYWORDS, OMG!!!

My professional background and skill set are not proof that I'm part of some secret scheme to take down Blake Lively. It doesn't mean that Justin, Sam, Wayfarer, or the fucking Illuminati directed me to do ANYTHING. These were comments and posts published openly under my own account, in a public community I openly participate in, expressing opinions I have never hidden.

To be clear, I do not have any additional messages from Justin, Sam, or anyone on his team and I'm not being paid by ANYONE. There are no payment records, contracts, instructions from Justin, messages between me and Wayfarer, communication between me and Justin, or evidence that I had ever spoken to Sam before the James Scott exchange because NONE OF THESE THINGS EXIST.

Since Expat and his legion of turds can't comprehend why anyone would do something helpful without being paid: I happen to enjoy being helpful and I genuinely think James' case is interesting. I also have a massive fucking crush on Lauren but that's besides the point. For the sake of EXTRA transparency, I also created dedicated subreddits for James because Team Justin was obviously no longer the appropriate place to keep posting about a completely separate case. James deserves his own space and community.

Also, and this feels rather important, if Expat had done a second of research, he'd know that Wayfarer isn't even producing the movie about James. A completely different production company called Third Coast Film is developing it. So Expat's theory is apparently that Justin's team "deployed" me to volunteer my time building communities around a case that neither Justin nor Wayfarer have any monetary involvement in. Truly airtight logic.

The glaringly obvious problem here is that Expat and his Time Machine Truthers are demanding that I prove something that never fucking happened. I do not understand how I'm supposed to manufacture proof of a nonexistent relationship or nonexistent payments. I have shown exactly when I first contacted Sam and what was said. What proof could possibly satisfy their demands other than private, identifying information about myself? They invented the accusation and are basically demanding that I surrender my privacy as the price to pay for disproving THEIR delusions. Genuinely, what more could they possibly fucking want from me?

And because the unpaid Baldoni operative theory apparently wasn't deranged enough on its own, Expat and his supporters have escalated to deciding that I must literally be BocceGoHawks.

I cannot believe I have to utter these words, but I am obviously not BocceGoHawks. Apologies to her because she is an entirely separate person and frankly, far too lovely and dignified to be mistaken for my profanity-addled ass. Please stop dragging that poor woman into the consequences of my inability to complete a single paragraph without saying "fuck".

And yes, conflating two separate women of color into one interchangeable person IS racist. Expat's conspiracy caucus can apparently imagine an elaborate covert international operation, but cannot comprehend that two different women of color might both talk to Lauren and post about the same content. They do not get to plead ignorance, either. I have always been extremely vocal about being a woman of color and they're clearly very comfortable with digging into my post history.

There is something profoundly racialized about a white male public figure repeatedly mining a private woman of color for content. Expat has the larger platform, the established audience, and the ability to convert speculation about me into clicks, engagement, and possibly money. I get none of that power or protection. I get the dogpile, the doxxing risk, and the burden of disproving whatever fiction he publishes next. He gets content, I get consequences.

Unlike Expat, I am not a public figure. I do not have a dedicated audience waiting to counter whatever he decides to publish about me. I do not have a publicist, a media apparatus, or a built-in megaphone. There is no buffer between his content and my actual fucking life. He can publish a theory, collect the engagement, and move on. I am the one left dealing with weirdos trying to identify me so they can be the one to "prove" his conspiracy.

This racist collapse is also where Expat's white feminism becomes impossible to ignore. His supposed concern for misogyny mysteriously vanishes the moment a woman of color is being targeted for refusing to agree with him or perform the role he has assigned to her. When he publishes speculation, his audience treats it as fact. When I produce absolute, indisputable evidence, he dismembers it for parts and repackages the scraps as cherry-picked fodder for the same accusation: that I'm a plant, an operative, or secretly another woman entirely. My agency has to be erased because his conspiracy requires that a woman of color could not possibly have reached her own conclusions without being paid.

It's absolutely fucking insidious that Expat took information I had openly and repeatedly disclosed and decided it was appropriate to weaponize that transparency against me while his minions basically demand that I doxx myself. He completely twisted everything I had been honest about and churned it into a conspiracy fan fiction. If Expat wants to keep claiming I was "deployed", paid, or secretly coordinating with anyone, he can produce the fucking evidence. Otherwise, he can keep my name out of the steaming septic tank of intellectual sewage he desperately tries to monetize.

My Reddit lawyers, Santa Claus, the Pulitzer committee, and the International Tribunal for Crimes Against Basic Logic will be in touch.

Our subreddit has been buzzing with energy lately! Here’s a quick look at what’s been happening:

• 🔥Views: 8.7 million total, up 3.8 million from the previous month.
• 📈Members: We’ve grown to 63.9k, with 4.3k new joins
• 📝Posts: 590 published, up 167 from last month
• 💬Comments: 39.6k published

With so many new members joining, we wanted to share a few reminders.

• Many new members are just discovering this litigation. Questions that seem repetitive to longtime members may be completely new to someone who found us yesterday.
• If you can, point people toward our pinned resources, timelines, megathreads, and prior discussions. A quick link is often all someone needs to get up to speed.
• Please show new members the same understanding you hopefully received when you first joined. 
• Please note, every large subreddit occasionally attracts users whose goal is to provoke arguments or derail conversations. Please judge people by their overall behavior, not simply because they’re new or ask basic questions.

Help Us Moderate

• AutoModerator catches a lot behind the scenes, but it doesn’t catch everything.
• If you see content that violates our rules, please report it or send us a Modmail rather than engaging in long arguments. Community reports remain one of the most valuable moderation tools we have.

Reddit Has Sitewide Rules Too

• In addition to our subreddit rules, all users are subject to Reddit’s sitewide Content Policy.
• We’ve recently seen Reddit remove some posts and comments before our moderation team even has a chance to review them.
• If Reddit removes your content or issues a warning:
  • It was not necessarily removed by this mod team.
  • We generally cannot reverse Reddit’s decisions.
  • Appeals must be directed to Reddit.
• While we can’t say exactly how Reddit evaluates content, choosing thoughtful language and avoiding comments that could reasonably be interpreted as encouraging violence or celebrating harm is always the safest approach.

Thanks everyone!