To reduce additional cost and eliminate scheduling difficulties people often film in different locations.
Next week, we will tell you all about zoom.
No matter how many times he tried to get her attention, it’s still “who dis”.
In other breaking news, water remains wet!
No one is backtracking, no one is making additional claims about the edit. They are simply stating that before the NYT article was released and the lawsuits were filed, Hoover watched the film.
Justin and Emily are obviously hurting both emotionally and financially as Justin continues to struggle to find work.
In my opinion it has been one of their long term plans to produce some kind of documentary, because everyone knows the sway Netflix-style documentaries can have on reaching a wide audience. Originally they probably thought they had multiple people who would take part: Jenny, Isabella, Brandon, other crew members, etc etc. But then their own lies, greed, bullying caught up with them and everyone who was on their side suddenly abandoned them. I can’t think of a single person - other than RL and the fitness instructor- who are still openly supporting Blake. Not one solitary person. Ergo the best means they have of getting the public back on their side - a documentary- is lost to them, because the only people who would be in it are Blake, Ryan, Robyn and the fitness instructor, and you can’t make a compelling documentary with only four people.
With this option lost to her I’m really interested as to how she tries to claw back her career from here.
Candace and her husband, George, ran into Justin and Emily Baldoni at the airport in Iceland on Friday, August 28th while waiting to board their return flight home to the U.S.
She discusses it on today's episode of her show, starting at the 12:38 mark. She also shared some photos she took of their run-in.
https://www.youtube.com/live/JrhGEm8MGRY?is=T8hq1nvLBNQ246sj
So glad these two got to meet! ❤️ Remember, Ryan and Blake tried to subpoena Candace during the IEWU legal dispute, and falsely accused her of working with Justin's team behind the scenes to help "smear" Blake's name.
I feel like he's trying to convince us that he and Blake are still rich. All this showing off is bizarre.
He and Blake are two peas in a pod.
Ryan Reynolds public persona and his real life personality came to a head in this lawsuit and we have seen the kind of person Ryan Reynolds truly is when nobody is watching.
Court documents in this case have pulled back the curtain on how vicious, vindictive, manipulative and calculating Ryan Reynolds truly is and how far he is willing to go to force what he wants; that is evident among people in Hollywood.
🎥 Full Podcast Episode of Hollywood Raw Podcast from former TMZ host Dax Holt and NYC paparazzi Adam Glyn.
*
*
*
Related Posts:
Revisiting Ryan Reynolds' Psycho, Unhinged, Nasty & Dehumanizing Text Messages by u/Serenity413
Reminder of every time Ryan Reynolds was sexually inappropriate and creepy. by u/AMiniature
Ryan Reynolds will never stop mocking Justin. Never. This is ridiculous, and if he's in Doomsday you can bet he mocked him in that somehow.
Some people make history by winning.
Justin Baldoni apparently decided to try something more innovative:
becoming part of the first case to result in attorneys’ fees and costs being awarded under California Civil Code § 47.1.
So Congratulations, Justin Baldoni this historical moment will follow you the rest of your life. It will be included in your obituary! It will be cited by lawyers and law students when your children are grandparents.
Life imitates art?? At this point, these upcoming IMDb projects are sounding less like coincidences and more like foreshadowing. 😂
Seriously, though, I’m genuinely happy to see Justin and Wayfarer continuing their journey, focusing on projects they love and believe in, seemingly unbothered by all the glitter and fool’s gold of Hollywood. I’m really looking forward to seeing where they are five or ten years from now, when time has put some distance between them and this whole saga and given everyone a little more perspective.
As for Blake, ten years from now she will be a talentless older woman with a bit of a reputation in a ruthless industry, possibly still blaming Wayfarer for her misfortunes. I hope she and her sick husband wake up to reality and seek the help they very much need now.
Serious question.
I’m not really counting Jane the Virgin, where he was primarily a cast member rather than the person running the production. I’m talking about projects where his authority extended beyond his own performance such as, director, producer, owner/founder, executive, or otherwise actually in a leadership position.
Once Baldoni had meaningful control or responsibility over a project, has he ever been involved in one that didn’t eventually generate a lawsuit involving him, Wayfarer, or the production?
I’m genuinely asking because Five Feet Apart, the Wayfarer/Man Enough employment situation, and It Ends With Us all involved litigation. What are the counterexamples?
This is fucking disgusting, and I’m annoyed that we can’t see her answer because she was asked about this in her depo.
This confirms what I’ve been saying from day one: Sony was helping her, and Ryan Reynolds steal the movie from Justin Baldoni. This is just bizarre and mind-blowing that Sony was discussing this with Blake and Ryan. What the hell?
Source: Dkt. 130-2 Deposition: Excerpt of Blake Lively- https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.635782/gov.uscourts.nysd.635782.264.1.pdf
BLIND ITEM
Which actor/director/producer/podcaster/self-described feminist masculinity expert agreed to an extremely specific list of workplace protections because of their actions on set?
The List included:
No more showing nude videos or images.
No more discussing pornography addiction.
No more talking about sexual conquests.
No more descriptions of anyone’s genitalia.
No more entering trailers while someone was undressed.
No more unwanted touching or sexual comments.
No more adding sexual content, oral-sex scenes, or on-camera climaxing outside the approved script.
No more improvised kissing.
And the actor/director/producer and their production company are now known sex pests. No studio will go near them and no agent will work with them.
[deleted]
**Can Pro-Lively Content Creators Sue the Daily Mail?**Apparently they can.
Which is exciting news for the pro-Lively content creators, because as far as I know none of them have said they want to.
But don’t worry. Someone has volunteered them for litigation.
“I hope you can both sue.”
Sue??
Did they say they were suing?
No.
Did they threaten the Daily Mail?
No.
Did they start a GoFundMe?
No.
Did they ask this person to assemble the Avengers of Defamation on their behalf?
Also no.
What actually happened is considerably less cinematic.
The Daily Mail published an article naming content creators their source was Melissa Nathan, PR for Epstein, The Alexander brothers, and Justin Baldoni*. Her name was subsequently removed.
The creators themselves weren’t contacted for comment before being put into the story.
So yes, they might reasonably have questions about why their names were included in a PR-sourced celebrity article without anyone bothering to call them. They might strongly feel that this was just a shady attempt to get their names out to the public by a known bad actor.
That’s rather different from:
WE RIDE AT DAWN. COUNSEL HAS BEEN RETAINED.
You’re welcome for the clarification!
*yes the moron representing rapists thinks that content creators discussing workplace issues are the reasons she being harassed. And not that she represented the Alexander Brothers!
Crosspost Disclaimer: This sort of crosspost is about the argument and subject matter, not the OP, the commenters, the subreddit, their ancestors, their pets, or their life choices.
Discuss the argument here. Please do not visit the original post to comment, vote, report, poke, prod, investigate, evangelize, or otherwise announce your presence.
We are discussing an idea, not launching a field trip.
