u/ConstantPurpose2419

Image 1 — Blake Lively shops for luxury purses amid news of unpaid debt on unfinished mansion.
Image 2 — Blake Lively shops for luxury purses amid news of unpaid debt on unfinished mansion.
Image 3 — Blake Lively shops for luxury purses amid news of unpaid debt on unfinished mansion.
Image 4 — Blake Lively shops for luxury purses amid news of unpaid debt on unfinished mansion.

Blake Lively shops for luxury purses amid news of unpaid debt on unfinished mansion.

Thank you, Mercury News, for pointing out the irony of Blake shopping for purses while simultaneously having debt of over $2 million. How one person can be so utterly tone deaf is beyond me.

“Blake Lively appears to hope she can rehabilitate her
tattered reputation, following her bruising legal battle against Justin Baldoni, by parading around at the Met Gala on May 4 and by getting her photo taken on Tuesday evening while shopping for designer purses at a new-collection launch party at the Fendi flagship store in New York City”

“On the day Lively attended the Fendi party and mingled with other celebrities, the Daily Mail broke the news that the couple’s long-planned, sprawling upstate New York “dream home” remains unfinished and that they owe a combined $2.1 million for unpaid work to contractors. The Daily Mail, TMZ and other outlets cited records from Westchester County, which say that five contractors and subcontractors filed mechanics liens totaling that amount against the couple’s 110-acre property in April.”

u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 7 hours ago

More outlets picking up the $2.1 Million unpaid dept, while Lively tries to block negative headlines with a Fendi pap event.

Unfortunately for her it doesn’t seem to be working. But this is a tactic we’ve seen before right? A damning headline/ news story comes out, torching her reputation, and the next second she’s out there channelling Big Bird at some fashion event and telling people she’s shy 🥹.

Also worth noting is the second slide, because it was right after TMZ contacted Blake’s representatives asking about her lying under oath that she decided to settle, which essentially buried the story. If the DM are contacting her reps asking for comment on huge unpaid depts, and more news outlets are picking up the story, then more outlets will be contacting the Reynolds representatives and asking for comment, thus putting them in a vulnerable position (which they hate) and forcing them to make rash decisions (like agreeing to a settlement in which they received absolutely nothing). What we need next is a proper exposé story about the abuse and intimidation of content creators.

Why do I get the impression that things are going to start snowballing fast for the Reynolds pretty soon?

u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 1 day ago

Megyn Kelly sums up the Blake Lively ‘smear campaign’: Lively believes “There is no way people could just hate me organically.”

Looks like Megyn Kelly really let rip last night and Im here for it. Blake Lively is a woman with an ego so huge that she needs to believe that there was a smear campaign against her, because the alternative is that people just organically dislike her- and that, according to Blake, is impossible.

u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 8 days ago

Ryan Reynolds and Blake’s family STILL not coming out and saying anything in support of her- despite the case now being settled.

Can we just talk about how utterly weird this is? The case is settled, they/ he could easily now make a small statement in support of her, but no. Nothing. Absolutely nothing and all. And more than that Ryan hasn’t even been SEEN. He let her go to the MET gala on her own, her lawyers are making statements on her behalf, but from Ryan? Not a peep.

Justin’s friends are out there publicly supporting him - but who is speaking from Blake’s corner? Michael Gottlieb. That’s it. Not friends, no family, no colleagues. The only person speaking for her is a person she is paying to do so, and her family won’t publicly support her at all. You know, her huge, super-close, “mafia” like family? None of them are willing to speak up for her.

To me this is a HUGE red flag. Thoughts?

reddit.com
u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 11 days ago

What happens if Lively’s 47.1 motion fails and then she refuses to pay her attorneys fees?

So I’ve just gone back and listened to a few content creators reactions to the letter from Blake’s attorneys re’ 47.1, and a lot of them are suggesting that the reason Gottlieb and chums may be going to hard for this might be because Blake and Ryan are refusing to pay their fees, and that the only way they think they’ll get paid is by getting the costs covered by the other side. So my question is what happens if a client loses their motion for attorneys costs and then refuses to pay their attorneys? What happens in a situation like that? Any lawyers able to clarify?

reddit.com
u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 12 days ago

A small collection of articles post MET/settlement. Most of these have already been posted separately, but here they all are together. Please feel free to add any additions in comments. Despite a huge push by paid shills, both on here (anyone else notice the huge uptake of pro Lively commentators over the last few days, all saying essentially the same thing?), and via targeted articles in the press, the majority of MSM articles are still predominantly negative. Lively, as usual only able to think in the short term, and doggedly believing that she can force people’s opinions to change just by telling people how great she thinks she is, genuinely believed that attending the MET gala would solve all her problems and make everyone like her again.

Blake Lively is a woman living with cataclysmic levels of delusion and paranoia. She puts out articles via the press after reading posts on this sub. (Case in point: the MET gala invite + divorce rumors) - think for a second how utterly insane that is. She wanted the MET appearance to be seen as her taking back control, but instead the general public have viewed it as tone-deaf (on brand), exploitative, and a cheap grab for public favour.

u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 16 days ago
▲ 1.5k r/ItEndsWithLawsuits+1 crossposts

I know this isn’t the official MET Gala insta, but we do know she wasn’t invited, because the MET released the official guest list weeks ago. So how does one gain access if they are not invited? By paying. She paid to attend.

u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 16 days ago

I’m feeling a little low today so I’m sharing a photo of my lovely Millie - my soul cat - who I lost nearly two years ago. I miss her every day. She had a rough start and I was the only person in the whole world that she trusted, and it broke me when I lost her.

u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 17 days ago

Anyone? Blake is on full on reputation damage control at the only event which will allow her to attend, and where is her supportive spouse? Nowhere, again? Why is no one talking about this?

reddit.com
u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 17 days ago

MSM running this story was a disaster for Blake. If other news outlets had picked up the theme, as they often do, it would have been cataclysmic for her. It is no coincidence that she wanted to do literally anything possible to bury it. She’ll have known this was coming and I fully believe she’s been preparing for the fallout for weeks. Maybe she was hoping no MSM platforms would take up the story, but they did and her lies have been exposed to the world.

I don’t know how but we need to make sure that this story keeps getting traction, because what she wants is for it to get buried under the MET gala headlines.

Also can we talk about the fact that Ryan did not attend the MET? Divorce bells?

u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 17 days ago

So we know from previous episodes that Blake is allergic to acknowledging when she has messed up, and has formerly simply refused to release statements/ posts apologising for her actions. The plantation wedding (Ryan apologised) Princess Kate (non apology) etc. and this statement about the settlement is the same thing again. Wayfarer have released this statement and she said absolutely nothing. Settlement goes two ways, so what is her contribution to settlement of the mess she initiated?

reddit.com
u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 17 days ago

Some people are saying that Lively’s team have to respond and agree to the stipulation, but other people are saying that they don’t, and that the judge can rule at any time without Lively’s agreement. Anyone have any ideas?

reddit.com
u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 20 days ago

NAG mentioned that the judge granting/ not granting this might sort out the issues Lively has with the new stipulation, but what are the chances of it being granted? Any lawyers or anyone with experience know?

u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 21 days ago

“Their representatives have declined to comment” so news outlets have been asking Lively’s representatives about divorce rumors, then surprise surprise Blake posts a photo of her orange “such a babe” husband.

u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 22 days ago

Just thinking about the pre-trial hearing today and the Judge being particularly interested in the lost profits and social media manipulation. Does anyone know who Lively’s expert witnesses are In these areas? And how does everyone think they will fare re’ the Daubert standard?

reddit.com
u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 24 days ago

The community notes are still there guys. The Reynolds must be absolutely livid. I can imagine Ryan, crimson with rage, demanding to speak to the CEO of Instagram and have him personally remove them.

u/ConstantPurpose2419 — 25 days ago