Grant v. Higgins Impact on rifle components?
Given the upcoming supreme court case regarding individual rights to own an AR-15, I am beginning to wonder what, if any, impact the case may have on the Safe Act. If the Court decides that individuals do have the inherent right to possess such firearms, would this include the same right to the Ar-15s standard features, throwing out the safe acts restrictions on “Assault Rifle features” (detachable magazine, threaded barrel, pistol grip, muzzle breaks, etc). Or is it more likely that the case will be interpreted at the level NY law is now of “sure, you can own an AR, but the state can heavily restrict it”.
If the prior, is it possible we see standard sized 30 round magazines labeled as part of the guns inherent features too, possibly upending heavy magazine restrictions👀?